Friday, April 24, 2015

LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER GET'S RAVE REVIEWS FOR HIS ROLE AS PIPI LAUGHINGSTOCK !

The final curtain has fallen in The Medina Players' recent theatrical production of PIPI LAUGHINGSTOCK, a parody of the children's literary series PIPI LANGSTOCKINGS.

Illegitimate Medina "judge" LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER played the lead role of PIPI LAUGHINGSTOCK.  The role of PIPI'S paramour, TOKYO ROSE, was played by LAPDOG COLLIER'S real-life PARAMOUR, MISTRESS, and MAIN SQUEEZE, DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY.   Now, there's a match made in Heaven!

Critics report that LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER carried off the role of PIPI as if he were truly a LAUGHINGSTOCK, which of course he is in Medina County.

A prior reference to The Medina Players' theatrical production of PIPI LAUGHINGSTOCK can be easily found in this blog at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2015/03/lapdog-publius-collier-to-play-title.html

According to critics, the theatrical production was greeted by the audience with uproarious laughter from the first scene to the last.

In the opening scene, spotlights focused on the darkened stage at center stage where LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER, in his role as PIPI, was seated at his desk in chambers, wearing his black robes with his pants down around his ankles, and fondling his balls (much  as he does on a daily basis in his Kangaroo Courtroom #1). *

From beneath PIPI'S desk, DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY, in her role as TOKYO ROSE, swooned, "Oh PIPI, it's just so hard."

PIPI then replied, "I know. It's been this way for as long as I can remember."

Then, from TOKYO ROSE, "But PIPI, it's just so incredibly hard."

Finally, PIPI moaned, "Soon we're having carpet laid over these hardwood floors."

As the audience roared with laughter, the spotlights at center stage faded to black.

Suddenly, the spotlight illuminated DINO HOEMAN, stage left, dressed in jungle khakis, a pith helmet, and holding an over-sized fishing net.  HOEMAN then delivered his only lines in the production, "I can't find that WEASELPECKER anywhere!!!" **

More uproarious laughter as the light faded to black.

*     See prior post at this blog captioned LAPDOG COLLIER SEEN FONDLING HIS BALLS AT GOLF OUTING !!! easily found at  http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2013/09/lapdog-collier-seen-fondling-his-balls.html

**    See prior post at this blog captioned  WEASELPECKER CAUGHT ON CAMERA ! easily found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2015/03/weaselpecker-caught-on-camera.html

Given the resounding success of The Medina Players' production of PIPI LAUGHINGSTOCK, The Medina Players are planning another production wherein LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER will reprise the role of FELLATIO HORNBLOWER, the younger brother of Captain Horatio Hornblower.  LAPDOG COLLIER, in his new role as FELLATIO, will handle the discharge of seamen from the Royal Navy.

THE ARTS HAVE FINALLY ARRIVED IN MEDINA COUNTY!

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

ONE ROTTEN APPLE SPOILS THE BARREL. A BARREL OF ROTTEN APPLES SPOILS THE COMMUNITY !

THE RECENT DISCLOSURE THAT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN HAS BEEN IMPLICATED IN A MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME POSES NO SMALL CONUNDRUM FOR NEWLY SEATED MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE JOYCE KIMBLER.

IN THE PRIOR POST AT THIS BLOG, THE BLOGGER POSTED AN EXCERPT FROM A RECENT COURT FILING IN A CASE PRESENTLY BEFORE JUDGE JOYCE KIMBLER.
THE COURT FILING EXPOSES CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN AS INTIMATELY INVOLVED IN TRANSCRIPT TAMPERING IN MEDINA COUNTY, FROM THE VERY MOUTH OF DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY, OWNER AND OPERATOR OF MEDINA COURT REPORTERS, INC. AND THE MISTRESS, MAIN SQUEEZE, AND COURT REPORTER OF ILLEGITIMATE "JUDGE" LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER.

GIVEN THAT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMN HAS BEEN IMPLICATED IN CORRUPT AND UNLAWFUL CONDUCT IN A CASE BEFORE JUDGE JOYCE, WHAT IS SHE TO DO?

YOU SEE, DINO HOEMAN HAD CONDUCTED A FUND RAISER FOR JUDGE JOYCE WHILE SHE WAS CAMPAIGNING FOR HER CURRENT OFFICE !




THAT IS PRECISELY HOW PUBLIC CORRUPTION IS PERPETUATED IN MEDINA COUNTY.

HOEMAN HAS PURCHASED INFLUENCE WITH JUDGE JOYCE BY SUPPORTING HER CANDIDACY WITH A FUND RAISER.  WHERE'S THE "ETHICS" IN THAT?

IT WILL BE INTERESTING TO SEE JUST HOW JUDGE JOYCE HANDLES THIS.

IF SHE IS HONEST, SHE WILL RECUSE HERSELF FROM HEARING THIS CASE.

TIME WILL TELL WHICH WAY THE WIND  IS BLOWING WITH JUDGE JOYCE!

Monday, April 20, 2015

LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER'S MISTRESS, MAIN SQUEEZE, AND COURT REPORTER DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY IMPLICATES CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN IN TRANSCRIPT TAMPERING

SUDDENLY, THERE IS ANOTHER LEAK IN THE DYKE!  EVEN MORE EVIDENCE OF PUBLIC CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM HAS BUBBLED TO THE SERVICE.

IT SHOULD COME AS NO SURPRISE TO READERS OF THIS BLOG THAT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN IS IMPLICATED IN A MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME PERTAINING TO THE ESTATE OF A DECEASED MEDINA COUNTY CITIZEN.

IT HAS BEEN REPORTED THAT MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN MONIES AND PROPERTY HAVE SEEMINGLY VANISHED WITHOUT A TRACE, MUCH LIKE PASSAGES FROM NUMEROUS TRANSCRIPTS EDITED AND ALTERED BY LAPDOG COLLIER AND PRODUCED BY LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER'S MISTRESS, MAIN SQUEEZE, AND COURT REPORTER DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY.

IT SEEMS AS THOUGH ONE OF THE VICTIMS OF THIS MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME ORDERED A TRANSCRIPT OF A "HEARING" HELD BY LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER IN WHICH A NUMBER OF JAGOFFS FROM THE MEDINA COUNTY BAR & PICKPOCKET ASSOCIATION OFFERED TESTIMONY, MAKING THEM, BY DEFAULT, PARTIES TO THE CASE CONTRARY TO THE CANONS OF ETHICS.  (THE PRIMARY ETHIC FOR THE JAGOFFS FROM THE MEDINA COUNTY BAR & PICKPOCKET ASSN. IS SIMPLY, "DON'T GET CAUGHT !")

A PRIOR REFERENCE TO THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME WAS PREVIOUSLY POSTED AT THIS BLOG IN A POST CAPTIONED LAPDOG COLLIER ROBS ANOTHER GRAVE !!!  EASILY FOUND AT http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2014/10/lapdog-collier-robs-another-grave.html

LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER'S MISTRESS, MAIN SQUEEZE, AND COURT REPORTER DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY EXPRESSLY ADMITTED TO THE VICTIM OF THIS MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME THAT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN AND ONE OF THE ELITE JAGOFFS FROM THE MEDINA COUNTY BAR & PICKPOCKET ASSN. "REVIEWED" THE ORDERED TRANSCRIPT AND CULLED OUT A SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF PAGES FROM THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT.  WHILE THE ORIGINAL TRANSCRIPT HAD BEEN 92 PAGES IN LENGTH, HOEMAN "AUTHORIZED" GARRITY TO TURN OVER A MERE 16 PAGES.  THAT LEAVES 76 PAGES MISSING FROM THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT.

AS THE BLOGGER HAS REPEATEDLY POINTED OUT, TAMPERING WITH AN "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT IS A FELONY VIOLATION OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OHIO.

PICTURED BELOW IS AN EXCERPT FROM AN OFFICIAL COURT FILING, FILED IN A  CASE RELATED TO THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME, BEFORE NEWLY SEATED JUDGE JOYCE KIMBLER.

 
THE MANNER IN WHICH JUDGE JOYCE DEALS WITH THIS ISSUE WILL BE THE LITMUS TEST TO EVALUATE JUST HOW HONEST, OR DISHONEST, SHE MAY BE IN CARRYING OUT HER FUNCTION AS A JUDICIAL OFFICER.

CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN CANNOT JUSTIFY, ON ANY GROUNDS, HIS CONCERN ABOUT A CIVIL CASE INVOLVING THIS MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME BUT FOR HIS INVOLVEMENT IN THE SCHEME!

Friday, April 17, 2015

MEDINA ASS PROSECUTORS SHOUT THROUGH THE WALLS OF THE JURY ROOM TO PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS, ANOTHER OFFICIAL POLICY OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN

REASON #7 TO NOT HOLD THIS TRIAL, OR ANY OTHER TRIAL, IN MEDINA COUNTY.



The Logistics of the Medina County Courthouse Provides Prosecutors the Opportunity to Prejudice the Jury, Which Can Overhear Prosecutors’ Remarks Made in the Narrow Hallway Adjacent and Contiguous to the Office of the Judge’s Secretary, Where Medina County Assistant Prosecutors Regularly and Routinely Congregate During Court Proceedings.                      



Following Mr. Hartman’s first trial, one of the jurors made certain remarks to a third party with no connection to this case.  The juror’s remarks, as related to the defense by the third party, strongly suggested that the jury was prejudiced by certain remarks made by Medina County assistant prosecutors from the office of the judge’s secretary and the adjacent narrow hallway, made with the deliberate attempt to prejudice the jury.  This was, of course, just one more unethical tactic employed by the Medina County assistant prosecutors intended to deprive Mr. Hartman of a fair trial, done in bad faith.

Medina County assistant prosecutors regularly and routinely congregate in the office of the secretary to the trial judge during court proceedings.  The office is accessible via a narrow hallway, which also affords access to the contiguous jury room.  Comments made in the secretary’s office, and in the narrow hallway, can be overheard in the jury room.  Medina County assistant prosecutors have employed the logistics of the proximity to the secretary’s office to their tactical advantage to make remarks intended to prejudice the jury against Mr. Hartman and other defendants.

Further proceedings in this case, including the trial, if any, at Cuyahoga County will preclude the possibility of Medina’s assistant prosecutors from offering gratuitous remarks, within the hearing of the jury, intended to prejudice the jury against Mr. Hartman.

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

CAN LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER DISCHARGE A FIREARM WITHOUT SHOOTING HIMSELF IN THE FOOT ?

REASON #6 TO NOT HOLD THIS TRIAL, OR ANY OTHER TRIAL, IN MEDINA COUNTY.
           

Judge Collier Will Not Be On Hand at the Cuyahoga County Courthouse to Carry Through on His Threats to Inspector Hartman Nor the Medina County Prosecutor to Initiate a Contrived Prosecution




Medina Judge Collier, who is now desperate because of the proof of his unlawful conduct from which there is no escape and which Mr. Hartman has placed before the Court, has threatened Inspector Hartman.  As well, evidence developed by Inspector Hartman documents the unlawful conduct of the Medina County Prosecutor’s Office, which has tampered with evidence and continues to deliberately withhold discoverable evidence.

Collier has threatened to shoot Inspector Hartman, to plant drugs in his car, and to cause his arrest and conviction on a charge of OVI based on manufactured evidence, specifically a “canned” urine sample, among other threats.  See Mr. Hartman’s Motion to Dismiss, With Prejudice, on the Grounds of Prosecutorial and Judicial Bad Faith and Misconduct, at pp. 53-54, Exhibit Thirty-Seven.

The conduct of further proceedings in this case, including the trial, if any, at Cuyahoga County greatly diminishes the potential for Judge Collier to carry out one or more of the threats he has directed at Inspector Hartman. *

[FOOTNOTE: At the suppression hearing, Collier remarked that he holds a concealed-carry permit. (Suppression Hearing, Tr. at 32-33).  Inspector Hartman infers, therefore, that Collier carries a concealed firearm upon his person.]



Moreover, the conduct of further proceedings, including the trial, if any, at Cuyahoga County will diminish the likelihood that the Medina County Prosecutor’s Office and Medina County Sheriff’s deputies can engage in retaliation by planting evidence and/or causing the unlawful arrests and contrived prosecutions against Inspector Hartman and the undersigned, not an uncommon practice in Medina County.  See Mr. Hartman’s Motion to Dismiss, With Prejudice, on the Grounds of Prosecutorial and Judicial Bad Faith and Misconduct, at pp. 39-41, Exhibit Twenty-Five, re: State v. Lynn Vandeusen, Medina Case No. 12CR0388; Reply to State’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, pp. 55-58, Exhibit Seventeen, re: State v. Carol Gross, Medina Case No. 13CR0474.

Monday, April 13, 2015

MEDINA ASS PROSECUTOR ATTACKS DEFENDANT'S FAMILY, ANOTHER OFFICIAL POLICY OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN

REASON #5 TO NOT HOLD THIS TRIAL, OR ANY OTHER TRIAL, IN MEDINA COUNTY.


            The Medina County Assistant Prosecutors Will Not Be On Hand at The Cuyahoga County Courthouse to Badger, Insult, Harass, and Intimidate Mr. Hartman’s Family in the Case  at Bar.                                                    



During the sentencing hearing following Mr. Hartman’s first trial, Assistant County Prosecutor made disparaging remarks about Mr. Hartman’s parents.  (Sentencing Hearing, Trial I, Tr. at 20; additionally Salisbury’s remarks that have been deliberately deleted from the transcript, including remarks that Inspector Hartman, a highly decorated and honorably retired Federal law enforcement officer, had a “checkered past” in his career, as well as Salisbury’s denigrating remarks pertaining to Inspector Hartman’s investigation of the abduction and murder of Elgin, OH Postmaster Betty Jane Mottinger, resulting in the conviction and life sentence of John George Spirko).

Following the sentencing hearing, Christin Domonkos, Mr. Hartman’s sister, stated to Salisbury that she did not appreciate the manner in which he had disrespected her parents during the hearing.  Salisbury replied using foul and vile language, further insulting Mrs. Domonkos and Mr. Hartman’s mother.
Mr. Hartman chooses to not repeat Salisbury’s language so as to not offend the sensibilities of the Court. However, an accurate recitation of the facts of this encounter can be found at Mr. Hartman’s Reply to State’s Opposition to Dismiss, Exhibit Nineteen, January 30, 2010 letter to the Medina County Commissioners, copied to the Medina County Bar Association.
 

Friday, April 10, 2015

MEDINA ASS PROSECUTOR TAUNTS AND GOADS A CHAINED AND SHACKLED DEFENDANT, ANOTHER OFFICIAL POLICY OF CORRUPT MEDINA PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN, ONE OF MEDINA COUNTY'S LEADING JAGOFFS !

REASON #4 TO NOT HOLD THIS TRIAL, OR ANY OTHER TRIAL, IN MEDINA COUNTY.



C.        The Medina County Assistant Prosecutors Will Not Be On Hand at The Cuyahoga County Courthouse to Badger and Intimidate Witnesses in the Case at Bar.        



In Mr. Hartman’s prior trials, held at the Medina County Courthouse, Medina County Assistant Prosecutors engaged in the practice of badgering and intimidating witnesses.  Evidence is to be found in the trial transcript.

The following is taken from Scott Salisbury’s direct examination of Melissa Hartman’s wife who was compelled to testify after asserting her spousal competency privilege:

WITNESS:            Sir, I’m feeling a little badgered right now.

COURT:               I understand.  Do you understand the question?  He just wants to know whether you read it [statement] or not.  If you didn’t read it, it’s okay; if you did, it’s fine.

WITNESS:            Just like out there, when we had this whole thing.  He’s trying to make me feel like I’m lying about everything.

COURT:               He’s just asking if you read your statement or not.

WITNESS:            I feel very intimidated by this gentleman.

COURT:               Here’s what we’re going to do.  We are just going to have one question at a time.  Okay?

                              Mr. Salisbury, your next question, please.

BY SALISBURY

Q.                          I don’t know whether the Jury heard that.  What did you just say to the Judge?

A.                          That was between me and the Judge.

COURT:               That’s fine.  Mr. Salisbury, your next question.

Q.                          Did you just say you feel like you’re lying about everything?  Is that what - - I couldn’t hear you.

A.                          You make it seem like I lie about everything, just like you told me outside, when you badgered me out there before we came in the courtroom. 

Q.                          What did I say to you?

A.                          “Are you going to lie or are you going to tell the truth?”

Q.                          That’s badgering?

A.                          The way you said it.  You know how you were, you intimidated me and scared me out there.               [Emphasis added.]

(Melissa Hartman, Trial I, Tr. at 74-75).

Similarly, Assistant County Prosecutor Scott Salisbury repeatedly taunted and goaded Mr. Hartman (who was handcuffed and shackled) without permission and outside the presence of his attorney.  Moreover, Salisbury shouted at the undersigned to “Shut up” when she instructed Salisbury to cease taunting Mr. Hartman in her presence, which he did in violation of the Canons of Ethics. See Reply to State’s Opposition to Dismiss, Exhibit Two at p. 5, § F, November 8, 2009 letter from the undersigned to Scott Salisbury.  See also 1/04/2010 Defendant’s Post-Hearing Rebuttal Memorandum, With Exhibits, at pp. 15-16.

Similarly, Sheriff’s deputies taunted defense witness Steven Hartman as he waited to offer testimony at Mr. Hartman’s first trial.

As a precautionary measure at Mr. Hartman’s second trial, the undersigned required Inspector Hartman, her investigator, to remain outside the courtroom to prevent further witness intimidation by the Medina County Prosecutor’s Office and Medina County Sheriff’s deputies, thus depriving the undersigned of his assistance in the courtroom at trial.