Monday, June 18, 2018

DEJA VU !!!!

AFTER FUMBLING AROUND IN THE DARK FOR THE PAST 18 MONTHS, MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR AND DO-NOTHING SHERIFF THOMAS MILLER HAVE FINALLY THROWN IN THE TOWEL AND CONCEDED THAT THE COUNTRY BUMPKINS AT THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE LACK THE ABILITY TO SOLVE THE MURDER OF LAFAYETTE TOWNSHIP TRUSTEE BRYON MACRON.

IT WOULD SEEM THAT ON ONE RECENT DAY, THOMPSON AWOKE, GOT OUT OF BED, AND FINALLY SMELLED THE COFFEE.

THIS RECENT DEVELOPMENT PRESENTS THE BLOGGER WITH A VERY REAL SENSE OF DEJA VU!

REGULAR READERS OF THIS BLOG WILL RECALL THAT, ABOUT A YEAR AGO, THE BLOGGER REPORTED HAVING HAD A NOT-SO-AMIABLE PHONE CONVERSATION WITH SHERIFF'S MAJOR (F@@KUP) LYING PINOCCHIO CENTNER(D) FOLLOWING CENTNER(D)' TELEPHONE CALL TO VICTORIA MACRON'S ATTORNEY, LEVYING A NUMBER OF UNSUPPORTED AND PROVABLY FALSE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE BLOGGER.

DURING, THE BLOGGER'S PHONE CONVERSATION WITH CENTNER(D), THE BLOGGER CONFRONTED THIS LYING F@KWAD AND INFORMED CENTNER(D) THAT HE WAS INCAPABLE OF SOLVING THE MURDER OF BRYON MACRON.

OF COURSE, THE BLOGGER DIDN'T NEED A CRYSTAL BALL TO PREDICT CENTNER(D)'S FAILURE TO SOLVE THIS MURDER. HUGGING TREES AS A MEDINA COUNTY PARK RANGER JUST DIDN'T PREPARE CENTNER(D) TO UNDERTAKE AND "LEAD" A HOMICIDE INVESTIGATION.

THE BLOGGER SIMPLY DRAWS THE READERS' ATTENTION TO CENTNER(D)'S "PRESS CONFERENCE" DISCLOSING THE RESULT OF THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT'S NON-INVESTIGATION OF THE MURDER OF BRYON MACRON.  READERS WILL CERTAINLY RECALL CENTNER(D)'S WILDLY PREPOSTEROUS CONCLUSION, "NO ONE OTHER THAN BRYON MACRON WAS INVOLVED IN HIS DEATH," AFTER MAKING SOME DISPARAGING REMARKS ABOUT BRYON'S CHARACTER THAT DO NOT BEAR REPEATING.

AS IT TURNS OUT, AND VERY PREDICTABLY, THE BLOGGER WAS CORRECT AS DEMONSTRATED BY A RECENT TURN OF EVENTS AS REPORTED IN THE MEDINA GASSETTE, WHERE NO NEWS IS GOOD NEWS, AT http://www.medina-gazette.com/Medina-County/2018/06/13/BCI-to-take-over-investigation-into-former-Lafayette-trustees-death.html

WHAT SAY WE TAKE A GANDER AT THAT NIFTY BIT OF REPORTING.

BCI to take over investigation into former Lafayette trustee Bryan Macron's death

“The investigation conducted by sheriff’s detectives answered many questions surrounding this tragedy,” a joint statement from Miller and Prosecutor S. Forrest Thompson said. “Unfortunately, many questions remain in this ongoing investigation. The primary goal for expanding BCI’s involvement is to ensure that every available investigative resource is brought to bear in order to find answers for the Macron family and the community.”
IT IS CERTAINLY WORTH EXAMINING THOMPSON'S SELF-SERVING STATEMENT A LITTLE MORE CLOSELY.

IT IS DIFFICULT, IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE, TO BELIEVE THAT THOMPSON IS CONCERNED IN THE LEAST BIT ABOUT FINDING "ANSWERS FOR THE MACRON FAMILY." NEITHER THOMPSON NOR LYING PINOCCHIO CENTNER(D) EVER GAVE THE MACRON FAMILY ANY INFORMATION OR "ANSWERS" IN ANY RESPECT TO THE MURDER OF THEIR LOVED ONE.  

READERS NEED ONLY LOOK TO THE FACT THAT THESE MORONS REFUSED TO SHARE THE RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY AUTOPSY REPORT WITH THE MACRON FAMILY - EVER! THAT SIMPLE FACT, AMONG MANY OTHERS, FAILS TO SUGGEST THAT THOMPSON OR SHERIFF MILLER HAD THE LEAST BIT OF CONCERN ABOUT PROVIDING "ANSWERS" OF ANY SORT TO THE MACRON FAMILY, ALTHOUGH IT DOES SUGGEST A COVER-UP.

EVEN MORE INTERESTING IS THOMPSON'S UNSUPPORTED AND WILDLY PREPOSTEROUS CLAIM, The investigation conducted by sheriff’s detectives answered many questions surrounding this tragedy.”

JUST WHAT QUESTIONS DID THE SHERIFF'S "SUMMER'S EVE" DEFECTIVES ANSWER BY THEIR NON-INVESTIGATION OF THE MURDER OF BRYON MACRON?

A BRIEF REVIEW OF THEIR "ANSWERS" IS CLEARLY IN ORDER!

HOW ABOUT THE CLAIM, MADE BY THOMPSON HIMSELF, NO DOUBT BASED ON THE INCOMPETENT CONCLUSION OF MAJOR (F@@KUP)LYING PINOCCHIO CENTNER(D) THAT BRYON MACON "STAGED" THE OBVIOUS CRIME SCENE AT THE LAFAYETTE TOWNSHIP ADMIN BUILDING? WHAT IS THE "ANSWER" TO THAT QUESTION? 

OR HOW ABOUT THE CLAIM MADE BY ONE OF THESE "SUMMER'S EVE" DEFECTIVES THAT BRYON MACRON JUST UP AND LEFT HIS FAMILY TO START A NEW LIFE IN CALIFORNIA, BASED UPON NO EVIDENCE AT ALL. THAT WAS PUBLISHED IN MEDIA REPORTING. WHAT'S THE ANSWER TO THAT "CONCLUSION" GIVEN THE LATER RECOVERY OF BRYON MACRON'S REMAINS IN CHIPPEWA LAKE?

WHAT THESE SHERIFF'S "SUMMER'S EVE" DEFECTIVES HAVE YET TO ANSWER IS WHY THEY FAILED TO CONDUCT A GROUND SEARCH FOR BRYON WHEN HE WAS REPORTED MISSING, OR WHY THEY BARRED THE LAFAYETTE FIRE DEPARTMENT FROM SEARCHING THE LAKE ON THE DATE OF BRYON'S "DISAPPEARANCE." WHERE IS THAT ANSWER?

THEY HAVE YET TO ANSWER, ACCORDING TO THEIR "THEORY," HOW BRYON MACRON SELF-INFLICTED 6 NON-FATAL STAB WOUNDS UPON HIS PERSON, DROVE TO CHIPPEWA LAKE, GOT OUT OF HIS CAR LEAVING NO BLOOD TRAIL OR FOOTPRINTS, TRAVERSED A THIN LAYER OF ICE ON THE LAKE WITHOUT BREAKING THROUGH, AND THEN CAST HIMSELF AFTER HIS DEATH INTO THE ICY WATERS OF CHIPPEWA LAKE.  THAT "ANSWER" HAS YET TO BE FORTHCOMING!

THEY HAVE YET TO "ANSWER" WHY THEY REFUSED QUALIFIED ASSISTANCE FROM OTHER AGENCIES, LIKE BCI, OR WHY THEY BARRED A VETERANS' SEARCH ORGANIZATION WITH TRAINED CANINES TO CONDUCT A SEARCH FOR BRYON. OR WHY THEY REFUSED AN OFFER OF ASSISTANCE WHO WAS PREPARED TO SEARCH THE LAKE FOR BRYON'S REMAINS WITH SIDE-SCAN SONAR.

THOSE ARE QUESTIONS THAT REMAIN UNANSWERED AND LIKELY NEVER WILL.

COMPLETE INCOMPETENCE OR COVER-UP? YOU, THE READERS, CAN DECIDE.

THE MACRON FAMILY ONLY HOPES THAT BCI WILL ASSIGN A COMPETENT CRIMINAL INVESTIGATOR TO BRING THIS CASE TO A PROPER RESOLUTION WITH THE ARRESTS AND CONVICTIONS OF THE TWO OFFENDERS WHO MURDERED BRYON MACRON. 








Friday, June 15, 2018

MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S MAJOR (F@@KUP) LYING PINOCCHIO CENTER(D) HAS NO ANSWER TO VICTORIA MACRON'S DEMAND, "WHERE ARE THE SEARCH WARRANTS?"

UNDERSTANDABLY AGGRIEVED BY THE COVERUP OF THE MURDER OF HER HUSBAND, LAFAYETTE TOWNSHIP TRUSTEE BRYON MACRON, VICTORIA MACRON, BRYON'S SPOUSE, HAS RAISED MORE THAN A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT THE FAILED SO-CALLED "INVESTIGATION BY THE "SUMMER'S EVE" DEFECTIVES AT THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE.

THE SHERIFF'S "COMMAND STAFF," FORMERLY LED BY MAJOR (F@@KUP) LYING PINOCCHIO CENTER(D), WHO  APPARENTLY "DELEGATED" THE NON-INVESTIGATION INTO THE MURDER OF BRYON MACRON TO DICKLESS TRACY, HAS SIMPLY REFUSED TO RESPOND TO MRS. MACRON'S INQUIRIES AND FAILED TO "UPDATE" HER ON WHAT THEY HAVE FAILED TO DO!

HERE IS A PERFECT CASE, PRECISELY ON POINT!

APPROXIMATELY THREE MONTHS AGO, MRS. MACRON'S ATTORNEY SENT A LETTER TO MAJOR (F@@KUP) CENTNER(D) REQUESTING CERTAIN RELEVANT INFORMATION FROM THIS INCOMPETENT BOOB!

AMONG OTHER THINGS, MRS. MACRON'S ATTORNEY REQUESTED MAJOR (F@@KUP) CENTNER(D) TO PROVIDED COPIES OF SEARCH WARRANTS FOR THE BLOODY CRIME SCENES AT THE LAFAYETTE TOWNSHIP ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, BRYON'S AUTOMOBILE (SEIZED BY THE "SUMMER'S EVE" DEFECTIVES, BRYON'S CELL PHONE, AND BRYON'S LAPTOP COMPUTER.

MAJOR (F@@KUP) CENTNERD(S)' RESPONSE WAS NO RESPONSE AT ALL. NO SURPRISE AT ALL THERE. OF COURSE, THE SAME HOLDS TRUE OF MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR FORREST THOMPSON WHO HAS SIMILARLY REFUSED TO RESPOND TO LETTERS FROM MRS. MACRON'S ATTORNEY.

THAT'S RIGHT, MAJOR (F@@KUP) CENTNER(D) RIGHT ALONG WITH THOMPSON SIMPLY FAILED TO RESPOND TO THE REQUEST, ADOPTING THE TYPICAL MEDINA COUNTY TACTIC OF SIMPLY IGNORING THE PROBLEM UNDER THE BELIEF THAT THE PROBLEM WILL JUST GO AWAY.  CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY "PUBLIC SERVANTS" HAVE BEEN DOING THIS FOR YEARS.

"WHY, " MIGHT YOU THE READERS ASK, "HAS CENTNER(D) REFUSED TO RESPOND AND PROVIDE COPIES OF ANY SUCH SEARCH WARRANT?"

THE TROUBLING ANSWER IS OBVIOUS, THESE MORONS FROM THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE NEVER APPLIED FOR OR RECEIVED ANY SUCH SEARCH WARRANTS!

THIS IS A BIG PROBLEM AND SPEAKS TO THE TOTAL INCOMPETENCE OF MAJOR (F@@KUP) CENTER(D) [WHOSE ONLY PURPORTED "LAW ENFORCEMENT" EXPERIENCE CONSISTS OF A STINT AS A RADIO ROOM SUPERVISOR AND A PARK RANGER IN THE MEDINA COUNTY PARK DISTRICT] AND HIS ""SUMMER'S EVE" DEFECTIVES.

THESE MORONS FAILED UTTERLY TO PERFORM AT THE MOST BASIC LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE EXPECTED OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS.

THESE BOOBS DO NOT COMPORT THEIR CONDUCT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW, LIKELY BECAUSE THEY DO NOT KNOW AND COMPREHEND THE LAW. THEN AGAIN, WITH CORRUPT JUDGES LIKE 'WEASELPECKER" COLLIER, A WORTHLESS F@CK ON HIS BEST DAY, SEATED ON THE BENCH, WHY BOTHER?

FOR THE SAKE OF CONVENIENCE, PERHAPS WE SHOULD REVIEW THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, WHICH MAJOR (F@@KUP) LYING CENTNER(D) HAS NEVER READ.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
BRYON MACRON, AS THE MORONS AT THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE CONCEDED AT THE OUTSET [DESPITE A BLOODY CRIME SCENE AT THE LAFAYETTE ADMIN BUILDING] WAS PRESUMED TO BE A MISSING PERSON, ALIVE BUT MISSING.

BRYON MACRON, A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES, WAS ACCORDED THE FULL PROTECTIONS OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT. THE MORONS AT THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, LED BY MAJOR (F@@KUP) CENTNER(D), VIOLATED THOSE CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEES WHEN THEY CONDUCTED UNLAWFUL, WARRANTLESS SEARCHES OF BRYON MACRON'S PERSONAL PROPERTY.

AS AN ASIDE, THE BODIES WILL BE STACKING UP LIKE CORDWOOD OVER AT HICKLY TOWNSHIP WHEN THE DOPE DEALERS AND BAD GUYS DISCOVER THAT LYING PINOCCHIO CENTER(D) IS NOW THE CHIEF (F@@KUP) AT THE HICKLY POLICE DEPARTMENT.

THIS UNTRAINED DOUCHEBAG CERTAINLY THUMBS HIS NOSE AT THE LAW AND, MOREOVER, HAS NOT THE SLIGHTEST NOTION AS TO HOW TO CONDUCT A COMPETENT CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION.

WHAT A COMPLETE WASTE OF PUBLIC MONIES!

Wednesday, June 13, 2018

IT JUST KEEPS ON GETTING BETTER!!!

 THE GOOD NEWS ABOUT “WEASELPECKER” COLLIER’S CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES KEEPS ON COMIN AND IT’S GETTING BETTER EVERYDAY!

AS THE INFORMATION KEEPS ROLLING IN, AND THE RATS ARE BEGINNING TO ABANDON THE SINKING SHIP, IT HAS BECOME CLEAR THAT “WEASELPECKER” COLLIER HAS EVEN GREATER CULPABILITY IN THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME THAN EVEN THE BLOGGER COULD HAVE IMAGINED.

BASED UPON DEVELOPING INFORMATION, IT IS LOOKING MORE AND MORE LIKELY THAT PRISON IS AN INEVITABILITY FOR THIS CORRUPT MORON.

HERE IS THE LATEST DEVELOPMENT IN THE SAGA OF MEDINA COUNTY PUBLIC CORRUPTION, AT LEAST AS IT PERTAINS TO THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME.

MR. GREGG DEPEW, A VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME, RECENTLY HAD A HEART-TO-HEART CHAT WITH ONE OF THE LOCAL JAGOFF ATTORNEYS INVOLVED IN THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME, IN WHICH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND THE STATE OF.OHIO HAD BEEN DEFRAUDED BY THESE MOPES OF SEVERAL HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS IN UNPAID TAXES.

IT’S NOT NICE TO FOOL WITH MOTHER NATURE . . . OR THE TAX MAN, FOR THAT MATTER!

ACCORDING TO MR. DEPEW, THIS LOCAL JAGOFF ATTORNEY CONFESSED THAT ”WEASELPECKR”  COLLIER IS THE WORTHLESS F@CK WHO PERSONALLY DRAFTED AND IMPOSED A LIFE-LONG PERMANENT INJUNCTION ON DEPEW.

IN OTHER WORDS, “WEASELPECKER” COLLIER PULLED THIS PERMANENT INJUNCTION OUT OF HIS ASS TO. COVER HIS OWN ASS FOR HIS PERSONAL INVOLVEMENT IN THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME. COLLIER BARRED MR. DEPEW FROM REPORTING THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES AND REGULATORY AGENCIES. IN AN ILL FATED ATTEMPT TO CONCEAL AND COVER UP HIS OWN CRIMINAL CONDUCT.

IN LAW, “WEASELPECKER” COLLIER MANUFACTURED AND IMPOSED THE UNLAWFUL INJUNCTION UPON MR. DEPEW, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS “SHAM PROCESS,”  A FELONY COGNIZABLE UNDER OHIO LAW.

THIS IS JUST ONE MORE FELONY ADDED TO THE GROWING LIST OF COLLIER’S FELONY CRIMES.

UNDERSTANDABLY THIS PARTICULAR JAGOFF ATTORNEY HAS EXPRESSED HIS RELUCTANCE TO TESTIFY, AND UNDERSTANDABLY SO!

ROBERT MUELLER HAS A SOLUTION FOR THAT.!

AS THIS CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION GATHERS MOMENTUM, A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR NEED ONLY IMPANEL A SPECIAL GRAND JURY AND SUBPOENA ALL OF THE JAGOFF ATTORNEYS INVOLVED TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH.

WHILE EACH OF THESE JAGOFFS IS LIKELY TO ASSERT THE FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION, AND THERE IS PLENTY OF INCRIMINATION TO GO AROUND, THEY CANNOT REFUSE TO GIVE TESTIMONY AGAINST COLLIER.

IF ANY ONE OR MORE REFUSES. TO GIVE TESTIMONY AGAINST COLLIER, THEY CAN BE HELD IN CUSTODY FOR THE FULL TERM OF THE GRAND JURY OR UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THEY AGREE TO COOPERATE AND TESTIFY TRUTHFULLY..

 CONVERSELY, IF ONE OR MORE OF THESE JAGOFF ATTORNEYS GIVES FALSE TESTIMONY, THEY CAN BE CRIMINALLY CHARGED..

RELUCTANCE TO TESTIFY ON THE PART OF THESE JAGOFF ATTORNEYS DOES NOT SEEM TO BE AN INSURMOUNTABLE PROBLEM.

IT’S COMING TIME FOR COLLIER TO FACE THE MUSIC. WITH ANY LUCK AT ALL, HE’LL SOON BE BEHIND BARS PLAYING THE SKIN FLUTE IN SHORT ORDER!


Tuesday, June 12, 2018

POS MEDINA COUNTY "JUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER, A COMPLETELY WORTHLESS F@CK ON HIS BEST DAY, VIOLATES THE BASIC TENETS OF AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE AS HE COMMITS CRIMES AGAINST CITIZENS OF MEDINA COUNTY!

AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE, IN THE REAL COURTS OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION (DISCOUNTING THE KANGAROO COURTS OF MEDINA COUNTY WHERE THERE IS NO RULE OF LAW) IS GUIDED BY CERTAIN DOCTRINES AND RULES OF PRACTICE INTENDED TO PROMOTED THE ORDERLY ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.

HERE IS WHERE WE ENCOUNTER THE FIRST HICCUP WHERE DELIBERATE INJUSTICE PREVAILS IN THE KANGAROO COURTS OF MEDINA COUNTY, ALL IN THE SELF-INTEREST OF THE MOVERS AND SHAKERS OF THE MEDINA COUNTY REPUBLICRAT PARTY WHO HAVE BENEFITED FINANCIALLY FROM THEIR HOLD ON POWER. THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE IS A PERFECT CASE DIRECTLY ON POINT WHERE CERTAIN LOCAL POLITICIANS HAVE REAPED SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL REWARDS CONTRA THE BEST INTERESTS OF RESIDENTS.

HERE IN MEDINA COUNTY GOVERNMENT, MONEY TALKS AND BULLSHIT WALKS. NO DOUBT! AMERICAN POET AND SONGWRITER BOB DYLAN IS QUOTED, "MONEY DOESN'T TALK, IT SWEARS!

TURNING TO THE MANIFEST INJUSTICE FOUND DAILY IN THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM, IT IS CERTAINLY APPROPRIATE TO COMPARE THE MISCONDUCT OF THAT WORTHLESS F@CK "JUDGE WEASELPECKER COLLIER" WITH THE DEMANDS OF THE LAW (OUTSIDE MEDINA COUNTY).

AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE (OUTSIDE MEDINA COUNTY) IS COMPELLED TO ABIDE THE DOCTRINE OF STARE DECISIS, WHICH, IN LAYMAN'S TERMS, REQUIRES A JUDGE TO FOLLOW AND RULE IN ACCORD WITH PRIOR LEGAL DECISIONS, PARTICULARLY DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.

IT WOULD APPEAR THAT WORTHLESS F@CK COLLIER BELIEVES THAT "STARE DECISIS" IS THE NAME OF THE NEW ROLLER COASTER AT CEDAR POINT!

THE BLOGGER NOW POINTS TO THE CASE OF THE INNOCENT MAN RAILROADED BY F@@KWAD COLLIER AND PROFILED AT THIS BLOG.

AS AN INITIAL MATTER, MEDINA COUNTY ASS PROSECUTOR (AND FORREST THOMPSON'S CHIEF (F@CKUP) OF THE CRIMINAL DIVISION SCOTT SLEAZEBURY, FAILED TO CITE TO ANY LEGAL AUTHORITY AT TRIAL.

THE BEST THAT SLEAZEBURY COULD DO AT TRIAL IS TO CLAIM, "THERE ARE CASES OUT THERE SOMEWHERE." THAT NEBULOUS CITATION TO "LEGAL AUTHORITY: WAS GOOD ENOUGH FOR THAT WORTHLESS F@CK COLLIER!

THIS, OF COURSE, IS NOTHING MORE THAN A PATTERN OF CONDUCT IN "WEASELPECKER'S" KANGAROO COURTROOM #1.

PERHAPS A DIGRESSION TO A DECISION FROM THE OHIO NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS IN State v. JohnsonNinth Dist. Medina No. 09CA0054, 2011-Ohio-3623.


The prosecutor’s [Scott Sleazebury] “cross-examination” of these women was improper, and the trial court [Judge Collier] should not have allowed him to get away with it[Emphasis added.] Id.,at ¶ 49.
[W]e note a suggestion from the Eighth District that, “[i]f we are to stop short of punishing the State for a prosecutor’s misbehavior by refusing to overturn otherwise valid convictions, perhaps such cases should routinely be referred to disciplinary counsel so that individual prosecutors can be impressed with the need for ethical behavior.” State v. Cody, 8th Dist. No. 77427, 2002-Ohio-7055, at ¶38.Id., at ¶ 70. 

THE COURT OF APPEALS NOT ONLY RECOGNIZED SLEAZEBURY'S USUAL AND CUSTOMARY MISCONDUCT BUT POLITELY EXCORIATED "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER FOR BEING THE WORTHLESS F@CK THAT HE IS IS, EVEN ON HIS BEST DAY.

LET'S LOOK AT THE CONTROLLING LEGAL AUTHORITIES  THE DEFENDANT PRESENTED IN HIS BRIEFS BUT TO WHICH F@@KWAD COLLIER TURNED A BLIND EYE AT TRIAL, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF RAILROADING AN INNOCENT CITIZEN, ONE MORE INSTITUTIONAL CRIME BY COLLIER.

FOLLOWING ARE SOME, BUT NOT ALL, THE CONTROLLING CASES F@@KWAD COLLIER IGNORED, VIOLATING THE DOCTRINE OF STARE DECISIS:


Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 635 (1886)
            - “Constitutional provisions for the security of person and property should be liberally construed. *** It is the duty of the courts to be watchful for        the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy      encroachments thereon.

Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 403-406 (1965)
            - The right of cross-examination, guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, is a   fundamental right essential to a fair trial.

Mapp v. Ohio,367 U.S. 643 (1961)
            - Evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment is not admissible     at trial.

Payton v. New York,445 U.S. 573, 586 (1980)
            - “When police conduct a warrantless search, the state bears the burden of establishing the validity of the search.

Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S.14 (1967)
            - Sixth Amendment right of a defendant to compulsory process extends to    the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.

Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 61-62 (2004)
            -  “The Confrontation Clause commands, not that the evidence be reliable,   but that reliability be assessed in a particular manner: by testing in the         crucible of cross-examination.

Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315-318 (1974)
            -Denial of the “right of effective cross-examination” is “constitutional error of the first magnitude” requiring automatic reversal.

Sparf v. United States, 156 U.S. 51 (1895)
- It is the duty of the court (not the prosecutor) to expound the law, and the jury to apply the facts to the law, otherwise the stability of justice and personal rights are jeopardized.

Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133 (2005)
            - “It is…elementary law, federal and state, that the judge bears         ultimate responsibility for instructing a lay jury in the law.”

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)
            - State’s obligation to disclose information and evidence favorable to            the defendant.

United States v. Agurs,427 U.S. 97, 104 (1976)
            - “… the Court has consistently held that a conviction obtained by the          knowing use of perjured testimony is fundamentally unfair, [Footnote         8] and must be set aside if there is any reasonable likelihood that the           false testimony could have affected the judgment of the jury.” 

United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, Fn 7 (1976), citing Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U.S. 103
-  Due process of law “cannot be deemed to be satisfied by mere notice and hearing if a state has contrived a conviction through the pretense of a trial which in truth is but used as a means of depriving a defendant of liberty through a deliberate deception of court and jury by the presentation of testimony known to be perjured. Such a contrivance by a state to procure the conviction and imprisonment of   a defendant is an inconsistent with the rudimentary demands of justice as is the obtaining of a like result by intimidation.”

United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, Fn 8 (1985)
- “…the Brady rule has its roots in a series of cases dealing with convictions based on the prosecution's knowing use of perjured testimony. In Mooney v. Holohan, (1935), the Court established the rule that the knowing use by a state prosecutor of perjured testimony         to obtain a conviction and the deliberate suppression of evidence that would have impeached and refuted the testimony constitutes a denial            of due process.”

Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293, 307 (1966)]
            - Government invasion of the defense camp compels conviction to be           set aside as constitutionally defective.

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 241 (1983)
- Probable cause, to be determined on the totality of the circumstances, requires corroboration of a tip by independent police work/investigation.

Whitely v. Warden, 401 U.S. 560 (1971)
            - Criminal complaint not setting out a statement of essential facts does           not pass constitutional muster.

Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721, 724 (1969)
            - There is no exception to the rule that evidence seized in violation of            the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible at trial.


Gray v. Mississippi,481 U.S. 648, 668 (1987)
            - “We have recognized that "some constitutional rights [are] so basic                      to a fair trial that their infraction can never be treated as harmless            error." Chapman v. California, 386 U.S., at 23. The right to an       impartial adjudicator, be it judge or jury, is such a right.

Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 172-173 (1997)
- “As to a criminal defendant, Rule 403's term "unfair prejudice" speaks to the capacity of some concededly relevant evidence to lure the factfinder into declaring guilt on an improper basis rather than on proof specific to the offense charged.Such improper grounds certainly include generalizing from a past bad act that a defendant is by propensity the probable perpetrator of the current crime. Thus, Rule 403 requires that the relative probative value of prior-conviction evidence be balanced against its prejudicial risk of misuse. A judge should balance these factors not only for the item in question but also for any actually available substitutes. If an alternative were found to have substantially the same or greater probative value but a lower danger of unfair prejudice, sound judicial discretion would discount the value of the item first offered and exclude it if its discounted probative value were substantially outweighed by unfairly prejudicial risk.Pp. 180-185.”

Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, at 14 (2006)
            - “Through the in limine procedure, the (courts) should redact or     exclude the portions of any statement that have become testimonial,      as they do, for example, with unduly prejudicial portions of otherwise          admissible evidence.

Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40 (1980)
            - Individual cannot be compelledto testify against a spouse.

Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, at syllabus ¶ 2
            - “Criminal defendants have the right under the Compulsory Process           Clause to the government’s assistance in compelling the attendance of   favorable witnesses at trial, and the right to put before a jury evidence         that might influence the determination of guilt.

Holloway v. Florida, 449 U.S. 905, 907 (1980)
            - “Thus the Court more than once has expressed the understanding that a lesser-included-offense (instruction) minimizes the risk of undermining the reasonable-doubt standard.

Sansone v. United States, 330 U.S. 343, 349 (1965)
            - “In a case where some elements of the crime charged themselves   constitute a lesser crime, if the evidence justified it, would no doubt be     entitled to an instruction which would permit a finding of guilt of the             lesser offense.

State v. Morris, 2007-Ohio-3591, at ¶ 37
            - In the prosecution for alleged violations of 2911.11 ORC, “due      process requires that the particularized nature of the accused’s        conduct includes the behavior that demonstrates he committed an     underlying offense.

State v. Hous,2004-Ohio-666, at ¶ 11
            -  “…jury instructions given at the end of a trial cannot relate back to           give an accused adequate notice of the charges against which an         accused must defend….

State v. Hubbard, 2004-Ohio-5204, at ¶ 6
            - “Under Evid.R. 602, a witness may testify only to those matters of which he has personal knowledge…gained through firsthand          observation or experience and actually perceived the subject matter of          his testimony.

State v. Taylor,(1993) 66 Ohio St. 3d 295, 300-301
            - “For a purported excited utterance to be admissible there must have          been: …(4) the declarant must have personally observed the event.

Cox v. Oliver Machinery Co., (1987) 41 Ohio App. 3d 28, at 35-36
            - “The key to the statement’s trustworthiness is the spontaneity of the            statement, either contemporaneous with the event or immediately            thereafter.” 

State v. Mitchell, 2007-Ohio-1696, at ¶ 19
            - “The Ohio Supreme Court has recently affirmed that recordings of            911 calls that werewhen the    declarantis not available to testify at trial.”

State v. Henness (1997), 79 Ohio St. 3d 53, ¶ 1 of the syllabus
- “…the testifying spouse remains incompetent *** until she makes a deliberate choice to testify, with knowledge of her right to refuse. The trial court must take an active role in determining competency, and must make an affirmative determination on the record thathe spouse has electedto testify.

State v. Hunt(1994), 97 Ohio App. 3d 372, 
- holding that a cross-examiner may not make testimonial assertions under the pretext of asking a question.


WHILE THE BLOGGER CONTENDS THAT 

THESE FACTS ALONE ARE SUFFICIENT TO

ESTABLISH A PRIMA FACIE CASE THAT

"WEASELPECKER" COLLIER IS A CROOK, 

IN THE SPIRIT ON MAGNANIMITY, THE 

BLOGGER IS PREPARED TO ACCEPT THE

 ALTERNATIVE THEORY THAT THIS 

F@CKING MORON JUST CANT READ!!! 

YET THE MOVERS AND SHAKERS OF

MEDINA'S REPUBLICRAT PARTY JUST LOVE

THIS CORRUPT DOUCHEBAG! IS THERE

ANY WONDER? 





Friday, June 8, 2018

"WEASELPECKER" COLLLIER, A WORTHLESS F@CK ON HIS BEST DAY, IS RESERVING A ROOM AT THE YMCA FOR PERMANENT RESIDENCE!

CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY "JUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER, A WORTHLESS F@CK ON HIS BEST DAY, HAD BETTER BE LOOKING TO RESERVE A ROOM AT THE YMCA, LOCATED AT EAST 22ND & PROSPECT AVE. IN CLEVELAND, ON A PERMANENT BASIS.

HERE'S THE SCOOP!

THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION HAS LAUNCHED A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME IN WHICH COLLIER PLAYED A PIVOTAL ROLE.

TO REFRESH THE READERS, "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER IMPOSED AN UNLAWFUL AND UNSIGNED  PURPORTED MEDIATION "AGREEMENT" (WHERE THERE WAS NO AGREEMENT) AND AN UNLAWFUL LIFE-LONG PERMANENT INJUNCTION UPON GREGG DEPEW, A VICTIM, BARRING MR, DEPEW FROM REPORTING CRIMES PERTAINING TO THIS MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES AND REGULATORY AGENCIES.

NOW, THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION HAS TAKEN A DIM VIEW THAT THEY HAVE BEEN DEFRAUDED OF TAXES EXCEDING $350,000. THEY TAKE AN EVEN DIMMER VIEW THAT "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER, UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW,
HAS FACILITATED THE TAX FRAUD.

TO SWEETEN THE POT, DONNA GARRITY"WEASELPECKER" COLLIER'S "OFFICIAL" COURT REPORTER WITH BENEFITS, IS ALLEGED TO HAVE DESTROYED RECORDS, APPARENTLY IN CONCERT WITH COLLIER, IN ORDER TO CONCEAL COLLIER'S UNLAWFUL ORGANIZED CRIME ACTIVITIES AS THEY RELATE TO THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME.

NEEDLESS TO SAY, GARRITY IS NOW SAID TO BE UNDER THE MICROSCOPE AS WELL.  OF COURSE,  GARRITY AND COLLIER HAVE BEEN MATERIALLY ALTERING "OFFICIAL: TRANSCRIPTS OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE COLLIER FOR AT LEAST THE PAST15 YEARS.  IT'S ABOUT TIME FOR GARRITY TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE!

THE BLOGGER IS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, AS A USUAL AND CUSTOMARY PRACTICE, WILL LIKELY SEIZE THE ASSETS OF THESE FRAUDSTERS.

THE BLOGGER CAN ONLY CONCLUDE THAT THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION MAY VERY WELL SEIZE COLLIER'S ASSETS, WHICH WOULD CERTAINLY INCLUDE HIS HOME!

IF THAT TURNS OUT TO BE THE CASE, COLLIER WILL TAKING UP  PERMANENT RESIDENCE AT THE CLEVELAND YMCA.

THAT IS NOT ALL, HOWEVER.  READERS MAY RECALL THAT, ACCORDING TO GREGG DEPEW, MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR FORREST THOMPSON IS LIKELY TO HAVE A HAND IN ALL THIS.

THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION MAY VERY WELL SEEK TO SEIZE THOMPSON'S ASSETS AS WELL. 

PERHAPS THOMPSON CAN RENT A ROOM NEXT TO COLLIER AT THE YMCA.

 IN FACT, THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION MAY VERY WELL SEIZE THOMPSON'S "CABIN," A PERSONAL ASSET HE IS ALLEGED TO HAVE PREVIOUSLY ATTEMPTED TO CONCEAL FROM THE U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT.

THE BLOGGER NEEDS TO INVESTIGATE AND FIRM UP INFORMATION HE HAS RECEIVED ABOUT THOMPSON'S ADVENTURES BEFORE THE U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT, THE RESULTS OF WHICH WILL LIKELY BE THE SUBJECT OF FUTURE DISCUSSION AT THIS BLOG!

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

LYING PINOCCHIO CENTNER(D), CHIEF (F@@KUP) OF THE HICKLY POLICE DEPARTMENT, SITS FOR HIS OFFICIAL PORTRAIT!

WITH NO SMALL AMOUNT OF AMAZEMENT, THE BLOGGER HAS LEARNED THAT HICKLY TOWNSHIP TRUSTEES HAVE DEMONSTRATED MONUMENTAL LAPSE OF JUDGMENT WHEN THEY HIRED SHERIFF'S MAJOR (F@@KUP) LYING PINOCCHIO CENTER  AS THE CHIEF (F@@KUP) OF THE  HICKLY POLICE DEPARTMENT.

THIS BUFFOON CLAIMS A "COLLEGE DEGREE" FROM ONE OF THOSE ONLINE "COLLEGES," WHICH ARE REALLY NO MORE THAN DIPLOMA MILLS.

THE LEVEL OF THIS MORON'S "EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT" IS EASILY EVALUATED BY DOING NO MORE THAN READING SOME OF THE DAILY POSTS THAT PINOCCHIO "AUTHORED"  AND POSTED TO THE FACEBOOK PAGE OF MEDINA COUNTY DO--NOTHING SHERIFF MILLER.

LYING PINOCCHIO CENTER(D) CAN'T EVEN CONSTRUCT AN INTELLIGIBLE SENTENCE. 

NEVER MIND CENTNER(D)'S SO-CALLED "LAW ENFORCEMENT" CREDENTIALS - TREE-HUGGING PARK RANGER IN THE MEDINA COUNTY PARK DISTRICT AND RADIO ROOM SUPERVISOR AT THE NORTH ROYALTON POLICE DEPARTMENT.

ALL READERS NEED DO IS JUST EVALUATE LYING PINOCCHIO CENTNER(D)'S "LEADERSHIP" (ACTUALLY LACK THEREOF) IN THE FAILED SO-CALLED "INVESTIGATION" OF THE HOMICIDE OF LAFAYETTE TRUSTEE BRYON MACRON.

CENTNER(D), WHO HAS NOT THE FIRST CLUE AS TO THE MANNER IN WHICH TO CONDUCT A COMPETENT CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, LACKS THE GOOD SENSE THAT GOD GAVE A ROCK!

CENTNER(D), WHEN CONFRONTED WITH A BLOODY CRIME SCENE AT THE LAFAYETTE TOWNSHIP ADMIN BUILDING, HAD NOT THE FOGGIEST INCLINATION THAT A CRIME HAD OCCURRED THERE! WHAT A DOUCHEBAG!

CENTNER(D) CAME TO THE UNSUPPORTED CONCLUSION, BASED UPON HIS COMPLETE LACK OF EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE, THAT "NO ONE OTHER THAN BRYON MACRON WAS INVOLVED IN HIS DEATH,"

THE DEPTH OF CENTNER(D)'S UTTER STUPIDITY IS OVERWHELMING!

NOW THAT LYING PINOCCHIO CENTER(D) HAS BEEN HIRED AS THE CHIEF (F@@KUP) OF THE HICKLY, OHIO POLICE DEPARTMENT, HIS FIRST OFFICIAL ACT WAS TO SIT FOR  HIS FORMAL PORTRAIT, TO BE DISPLAYED IN THE LOBBY OF THE HICKLY POLICE DEPARTMENT.  SEE BELOW!



GOOD LUCK TO THE RESIDENTS  OF HICKLY, OHIO. YOU WILL NEED IT WITH THIS BUFFOON AT THE HELM!

Monday, June 4, 2018

THE LATEST POP QUIZ !

AS  REGULAR READERS  OF THIS BLOG WELL KNOW, ON OCCASION THE BLOGGER TAKES THE TIME AND OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS A REASONABLE QUESTION FROM A READER. TODAY IS ONE OF THOSE OCCASIONS.  BELOW IS A WORTHY QUESTION FROM A READER OF THIS BLOG.

QUESTION OF THE DAY:

GIVEN THE MANNER IN WHICH THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF HAS COVERED UP AND WHITEWASHED THE MURDER OF LAFAYETTE TOWNSHIP TRUSTEE BRYON MACRON, IS IT REASONABLE TO BELIEVE THAT SHERIFF’S MAJOR (F@@KUP) LYING “PINOCCHIO” CENTNER(D) AND HIS COVEY OF UNSKILLED DEFECTIVES ARE:

1) TOTALLY INCOMPETENT?

-OR-

2) COMPLETELY LAZY?

-OR-

3) JUST PLAIN STUPID?

-OR-

4) CORRUPT?

-AND-

5) COMPLETELY WORTHLESS?

-OR-

6) ALL OF THE ABOVE?

CLUE TO THE READER, PUBLISHED IN THE AKRON BEACON JOURNAL:


WORST DETECTIVE WORKFormer Lafayette Township trustee Bryon Macron’s autopsy report said he was stabbed and slashed six times and suffered wounds to his neck, both forearms and a shoulder. No water was found in his lungs, so he died before going into Chippewa Lake. The Medina County coroner and the sheriff’s office concluded that “no other person other than Bryon Macron was involved in his death.” Which means he committed suicide. Stabbed himself and slashed himself six times, in the neck, forearms and shoulder. In his office. And then strolled out to the car, drove himself to the lake and jumped in. And stopped breathing immediately before he hit the water. Call me a cynic, but … . 
PICK A NUMBER, ANY NUMBER. THERE'S NO WAY YOU, THE READER, CAN BLOW THIS QUIZ!