THERE YOU HAVE IT. LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER DOES NOT WANT THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTY TO KNOW THAT HE HAS BEEN BEDDING DOWN HIS COURT REPORTER, WHICH EXPLAINS FULLY DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY'S MOTIVATION FOR PERMITTING "PUBLIUS" TO REVIEW, EDIT, AND ALTER TRANSCRIPTS BEFORE SHE FILES THEM IN THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS. TOO LATE NOW, "PUBLIUS," OR IS IT "PUBICus?" THIS CAT HAS LONG BEEN OUT OF THE BAG, CONTRARY TO YOUR BEST EFFORTS TO CONCEAL YOUR SORDID SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH YOUR "MAIN SQUEEZE," YOUR COURT REPORTER DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY.
Wednesday, December 17, 2014
THIS IS WHAT LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER REALLY DOES NOT WANT THE PUBLIC TO KNOW, PHILANDERING HYPOCRITE THAT HE IS!
Tuesday, December 16, 2014
LAPDOG "PIBLIUS" COLLIER, WHO HAS BOASTED THAT HE WAS A "C" STUDENT IN SCHOOL, IS OBVIOUSLY A VERY SLOW READER. IT TOOK HIM 13 MONTHS TO READ, EDIT, AND ALTER THE TRANSCRIPTS IN THIS CASE IN AN ATTEMPT TO DEPRIVE THIS INNOCENT CITIZEN OF A FAIR HEARING ON APPEAL FOLLOWING THE KANGAROO TRIAL BEFORE "PUBLIUS."
Monday, December 15, 2014
LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER TO SELEAZEBURY DURING PROHIBITED EX PARTE DISCUSSION: "i'll HELP YOU" (VIOLATE THE RULES)!
Case, Between Judge Collier and the Assistant Prosecutor, The Judge Was Overheard to Shout at the Prosecutor, “I’ll Help You!”
LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER HAS BEEN "HELPING" SLEAZEBURY AND CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN TO FRAME AND CONVICT INNOCENT CITIZENS FOR YEARS. NOTHING NEW HERE, EXCEPT THAT "PUBLIUS" GOT CAUGHT BY RUNNING HIS MOUTH ON THIS OCCASION. HOEMAN AND "PUBLIUS" BELIEVE THEY ARE UNTOUCHABLE.
Friday, December 12, 2014
In summary, we consider it to be fundamental that:
1. It is grounds for a mistrial when a lawyer in a jury case rests his case, having failed to adduce any admissible evidence of information harmful to his adversary that he has, in the presence of the jury, asserted to be true in a question to and that was denied by an adverse witness where the information is not otherwise in evidence.
2. It is professional misconduct where the information is put before the jury in such form that it appears that the lawyer is putting his own personal credibility into the balance for the jury to consider.
3. Accordingly, where a trial lawyer, under the pretext of putting a question to an adverse witness upon cross-examination, actually asserts to a jury the truth of unproved information substantially harmful to his adversary, the denial by the witness requires the lawyer to produce proper proof thereof. His failure to do so entitles his adversary to a mistrial.
4. The constitutional right to a fair trial in criminal cases makes the above rules applicable to lawyers engaged in a public prosecution. See Berger v. United States (1935), 295 U.S. 78.
In the case at bar, the prosecution "rubbed it in" in final argument, arguing the credibility of the accused and challenging the jury to consider "of what time she did work that day." The record contains other examples of prosecutorial misconduct, probably the result of inexperience, but condoned by the trial judge who was not inexperienced.
Finally, we have considered the entire record of this case in the light of the precedent of United States v. Dinitz (1976), 424 U.S. 600, and conclude that this accused has been sufficiently harassed by unlawful government procedure as to invoke the prohibition against unwarranted successive criminal prosecutions within the meaning of the Double Jeopardy Clauses of the federal and state Constitutions. [Emphasis added.] Id., 93-94.
VISITING JUDGE RICHARD (the) "DICK" MARKUS, CHIEF AMONG MORONS, PROVED HIMSELF TO BE JUST AS DISHONEST AT TRIAL AS LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER, AS THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS HAS CONCLUDED. AFTER ALL, "DICK" MARKUS. WHO WAS REAL CHUMMY WITH CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN DURING THE TRIAL, TURNED OUT TO BE JUST "ONE OF THE BOYS!"
Thursday, December 11, 2014
Wednesday, December 10, 2014
LAPDOG COLLIER, WHO IS IN DINO HOEMAN'S HIP POCKET, COMPLETELY IGNORED THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, AS IF IT DID NOT EXIST, AS WELL AS THE CONTROLLING LAW DECIDED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. THAT IS THE WAY HE MAINTAINS AN UNOPPOSED, LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, COMPLIMENTS OF DINO HOEMAN AND THE MEDINA REPUBLICRATS.
Tuesday, December 9, 2014
The blogger has decided to publish the entire MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT in segments. Any references to exhibits can be cross-referenced at the List of Exhibits, accessed by "CLICKING" the link at the upper right-hand corner of the web page directly beneath "PAGES."
Shown below is the first installment of the MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT :
THUS FAR, THE MOTION ADDRESSES THE BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN.