Tuesday, January 27, 2015

AN OUTRAGEOUS FRAME-UP AND ATTEMPTED LAND GRAB BY HOEMAN AND COLLIER TO GET AT THE VICTIM'S FARM FOR APPARENT REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT

Shown below is the TWENTY-SIXTH installment of the MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT, which LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER and the Republicrats at the Medina County Courthouse, Mosque & Railroad Station do not want you, the citizens, to see.  You can cross-reference any exhibits to the List of Exhibits by "CLICKING" on the link shown directly below "PAGES" at the upper right-hand corner of the web page:



                 State v. Lynn Vandeusen, Medina Case No. 12CR0388

This is an outrageous example of the corruption endemic in the Medina County “Justice” System.  Medina County Prosecutor Dean Holman framed Ms. Lynn Vandeusen, prosecuting and convicting her, and depriving her of her liberty for 6 months, on the basis of a corrupted transcript that Donna Garrity’s Medina Court Reporters, Inc. produced.  The Prosecutor accused Ms. Vandeusen of tampering with the transcript, even though she never possessed the transcript and had no means by which to alter it.

Ms. Vandeusen is divorced from former husband Duane Bostrom.  Following the divorce, Bostrom repeatedly filed a flurry of motions with the Medina County Domestic Relations Court, which Ms. VanDeusen has had to defend at no small personal expense.[1]

Prior to a scheduled hearing in Domestic Relations Court, Medina attorney David McArtor, who was then representing Ms. VanDeusen, requested Ms. Vandeusen to proceed to Donna Garrity’s Medina Court Reporters, Inc. and order a trancript of a prior hearing.  In accordance with McArtor’s request, Ms. Vandeusen proceeded to Medina Court Reporter’s Inc. with a handwritten note from McArtor addressed to the court reporter with the notation, “I will pick up.”  Ms. Vandeusen paid the cost of the transcript with a personal check and tendered the note to the court reporter.

That was the last Ms. Vandeusen knew of the transcript until she received a telephoone call from McArtor, who stated to Ms. Vandeusen, “If I’m going down, you’re going down with me.”  When she asked him to explain, McArtor reported to Ms. Vandeusen that the recently ordered copy of the transcript differed from the original.  Ms. Vandeusen was at a loss since she never possessed the altered and corrupted transcript furnished by Donna Garrity’s Medina Court Reporters. Inc.[2]

On June 27, 2012, the Medina County grand jury indicted Lynn Vandeusen with one count of uttering (F-5) and one count of tampering with records (F-3).  She proceeded to trial before Judge Collier.  The jury returned a verdict of “guilty: as to both counts of the indictment.  On April 22, 2013, Judge Collier sentenced Ms. Vandeusen to 180 days in the Medina County Jail, followed by a five-year term of community control.  Moreover, Judge Collier, as a condition of her community control sanctions, unlawfully prohibited Ms. Vandeusen from seeking gainful employment outside of and away from her family farm, a seasonal business growing and selling fresh produce.
On April 16, 2014, Ms. Vandeusen, Pro Se, filed motion to modify the conditions of her probation to permit her to seek gainful employment outside of and away from the family farm.  On May 9, 2014, Judge Collier conducted a hearing on Ms. Vandeusen’s motion to modify the conditions of bond.  Without permitting Ms. Vandeusen to address the court, or otherwise consider the merits, Judge Collier summarily denied her motion.
Inspector Hartman interviewed Ms. Vandeusen at Hinckley, Ohio on August 29, 2014.  Ms. Vandeusen declared her intention to not appeal Judge Collier’s unconstitutional order prohibiting her from seeking gainful employment, and was afraid to furnish an affidavit, all driven by the fear of retribution and retaliation from Medina County Prosecutor Dean Holman and Judge Collier.  She expressed a willingness to testify before the grand jury and at trial, however.
A copy of Inspector Hartman’s Memorandum of Interview of Ms. Lynn Vandeusen is attached hereto as Exhibit Twenty-Five.


[1] On one occasion according to Ms. Vandeusen, Duane Bostrom administered a physical beating to her during which she had been so badly injured she had been taken to the hospital for treatment.  Medina County Sheriff’s deputies responded and whisked Bostrom away to somewhere other than the Medina County Jail.  Bostrom was never charged for his assault on Ms. Vandeusen, or with domestic violence.
[2] Ms. Vandeusen is in possession of a copy of the handwritten note from attorney McArtor.  Even though McArtor authenticated the note, Judge Collier refused to send the note to the jury during deliberations and he did not permit them to hear what the note stated.

THIS IS AN OUTRAGEOUS EXAMPLE OF THE LEVEL OF UNCHECKED PUBLIC CORRUPTION, IMPLICATING CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN IN A DELIBERATE FRAME-UP AND UNLAWFUL ABUSE OF THE CRIMINAL "JUSTUS" SYSTEM FOR THE PERSONAL GAIN OF THESE CORRUPT POLITICIANS WHICH MERITS A LONG STRETCH IN THE FEDERAL PENITENTIARY.  NO PRETENSE OF AN INVESTIGATION BY THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE (AS DEFICIENT AS IT SURELY WOULD HAVE BEEN).  HOEMAN LIKELY PERSONALLY TAMPERED WITH AND ALTERED THE TRANSCRIPT AS HE HAS DONE IN ANOTHER CASE KNOWN TO THE BLOGGER.  THEN HE LAUNCHED THE PROSECUTION OF THIS INNOCENT CITIZEN WITH HIS OWN MANUFACTURED "EVIDENCE" IN HAND. MAYBE HOEMAN IS "SLEEPING" WITH DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY AS WELL AS LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER??? 

THE LEVEL OF CORRUPTION IN MEDINA COUNTY, DEMONSTRATED BY THE UNLAWFUL FRAME-UP OF AN INNOCENT AND BLAMELESS CITIZEN BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN WITH THE INTENT TO DRIVE HER OFF OF HER FARM FOR SOMEONE'S PERSONAL GAIN, FAR EXCEEDS THE LEVEL OF CORRUPTION IN CUYAHOGA COUNTY !!!
 

Monday, January 26, 2015

LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, ATTEMPTS TO CONCEAL THE FACT THAT HE IS NO MORE THAN AN IGNORANT BOOB !

Shown below is the TWENTY-FIFTH installment of the MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT, which LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER and the Republicrats at the Medina County Courthouse, Mosque & Railroad Station do not want you, the citizens, to see.  You can cross-reference any exhibits to the List of Exhibits by "CLICKING" on the link shown directly below "PAGES" at the upper right-hand corner of the web page:



.  State v. Joel Hysell, Medina Case No. 12CR0700

On December 12, 2012, the Medina County grand jury indicted Mr. Joel Hysell on one count of possessions of heroin (F-5).  On May 6, 2013, Mr. Hysell appeared before Judge Collier and entered a no contest plea to the indictment whereupon Judge Collier foud him guilty of the charged offense.  On June 24, 2013, Judge Collier sentenced Mr. Hysell to two years of community control, with random drug testing for the first 90 days.

On July 9, 2013, Mr. Hysell petitioned Judge Collier, so as not to run afoul of the conditions of his probation, for permission to reside with his fiance Ashley Marrs, with whom he shared a child.[1]

On August 9, 2013, Judge Collier conducted a hearing on Mr. Hysell’ petition.  Ashley Marrs, Mr Hysell’s fiance attended the hearing and was seated in the gallery of the courtroom to support him.  Although Ms. Marrs was not called as a witness, and never offered any testimony, Judge Collier recognized Ms. Marrs from her prior case.

During the hearing, even though Ms. Marrs was merely a spectator seated in the gallery, Judge Collier openly derided, denigrated, and publicly humiliated her in the presence of others in the courtrrom, behavior clearly not appropriate for a judge.

Ms. Marrs, later in the day, reported Judge Collier’s conduct to her mother, Mrs. Eva Marrs, who became incensed at Judge Collier’s offensive and inappropriate remarks and conduct in the courtroom.

On August 12, 2013, Mrs. Marrs order a transcript of Joel Hysell’s August 9, 2013 hearing, held before Judge Collier, from his court reporter Donna Garrity.

On or about March 15, 2014, fully seven months after Mrs. Marrs has ordered the transcript of the 20-minute hearing, court reporter Donna Garrity delivered the transcript to Mrs. Marrs.

Ashley Marrs reviewed the transcript and found that the transcript has been materially altered and that all of Judge Collier’s offensive remarks had been deleted from the transcript.
Ms. Marrs has furnished an affidavit, detailing the material alterations to the corrupted transcript, which is attached hereto as Exhibit Twenty-Four.


[1] Ashley Marrs had previously appeared before Judge Collier, pled guilty to attempted felonious assault, whereupon Judge Collier sentenced her to two years imprisonment.  Medina Case No. 08CR0548.

TRANSCRIPT ALTERATIONS OF THIS SORT HAVE GONE ON FOR YEARS!!!  RATHER THAN ACTING RESPONSIBLY ON THE BENCH, LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER HAS FOR YEARS RELIED ON HIS MISTRESS AND MAIN SQUEEZE DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY TO DELETE HIS INTEMPERATE, RUDE, CRUDE, AND INSULTING REMARKS FROM THE TRANSCRIPTS SO AS TO PERPETUATE AND CONCEAL HIS UNETHICAL, AND OFTEN UNLAWFUL, CONDUCT FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS.  THAT IS NO LONGER POSSIBLE, GIVEN THE DISCLOSURES MADE IN THE MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT, AND AT THIS BLOG.

THERE'S NO LONGER ANY WAY OUT OF THIS, LAPDOG.  PREPARE YOURSELF TO FACE THE MUSIC AND PAY THE PIPER, AT LONG LAST!  YOUR DAYS AS AN ILLEGITIMATE "judge" ARE RAPIDLY COMING TO A CLOSE AND WE, THE CITIZENS OF MEDINA COUNTY, WILL BE ALL THE BETTER FOR IT!!!
  


Saturday, January 24, 2015

HERE'S A RECOMMENDATION FOR NEW MEDINA LOGO !!!

FOLLOWING WAS TAKEN FROM AN EMAIL MESSAGE SENT TO THIS BLOG ON JANUARY 11, 2015:

Main Street Medina seeks design for bicentennial logo

Gazette staff
Filed on January 10, 2015 by

Main Street Medina is looking for a logo to celebrate Medina’s bicentennial in 2018. The committee of community leaders will be accepting design proposals until Jan. 30.

The committee is looking for a logo that will look equally good in black and white as well as color. The logo will be used on all print and marketing materials.

The committee indicated it would prefer a logo that does not focus on the Gazebo in Public Square and should include the words “Medina Ohio Bicentennial” as well as the dates “1818-2018” to signify the bicentennial.

No payment is offered, but the winner will be credited for the design. The logo will become the property of the city of Medina and the Bicentennial Committee.

The contest is open to all designers — professionals and hobbyists.

For more information, contact Dawn Conwill, assistant to Medina Mayor Dennis Handwell, at dconwill@medinaoh.org, or call (330) 722-9020.

The deadline for proposals is 5 p.m., Jan. 30.

WELL, IT'S ABOUT TIME THAT MEDINA HAS DECIDED TO "UPDATE" ITS 200 YEAR-OLD LOGO.

CALENDAR YEAR 1818, A MERE 40 YEARS FOLLOWING THE FOUNDING OF THE NATION, WELL PRECEDED THE CIVIL WAR, AND WAS THE TIME THAT THE OHIO VALLEY WAS CONSIDERED THE WESTERN FRONTIER.  NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES STILL FLOURISHED AND WERE REBELLING AGAINST THE DOMESTIC TERRORISM IMPOSED UPON THEM BY THE WASHINGTON POLITICIANS TYPICAL OF THE DAY.   COME TO THINK OF IT, THE QUALITY AND INTEGRITY OF POLITICIANS OVER THE INTERVENING YEARS HAVEN'T CHANGED ALL THAT MUCH, AND CERTAINLY NOT FOR THE BETTER.

GIVEN THE FACT THAT THE DOMESTIC TERRORISTS OVER AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE, MOSQUE AND RAILROAD STATION HAVE DEPRIVED THE LOCAL CITIZENRY OF ALL CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS AND, IN FACT, THE VERY RULE OF LAW, IT IS TIME TO LOOK TO THE FUTURE WHEN CONSIDERING THE NEXT MEDINA LOGO.

NOW, IT IS ABUNDANTLY CLEAR  THAT LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER, WITH THE FULL SUPPORT OF HIS MAIN SQUEEZE DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY, AND INCITED BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN, HAS IMPOSED SHARIA LAW UPON THE CITIZENS OF MEDINA COUNTY.

THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN U.S. LAW AND SHARIA LAW IS RELATIVELY STRAIGHTFORWARD.  UNITED STATES LAW (THAT DOES NOT APPLY IN MEDINA COUNTY) REQUIRES POLICE TO HAVE PROBABLE CAUSE TO BRING CHARGES OF CRIMINAL VIOLATION. ALSO, UNITED STATES LAW REQUIRES THAT STATE TO PROVE A CRIME BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT IN AN OPEN PUBLIC TRIAL GOVERNED BY RULES OF EVIDENCE AND RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (NONE OF WHICH APPLY IN MEDINA COUNTY).

SHARIA LAW HOWEVER PROVIDES THAT A CHARGE CAN BE BROUGHT WITHOUT ANY COMPELLING EVIDENCE OR PROOF, AND THE DEFENDANT IS PRESUMED TO BE GUILTY.  THAT IS THE STATE OF AFFAIRS IN MEDINA COUNTY, ALTHOUGH TO BE FAIR, LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER GIVES DEFENDANTS THE PRETENSE OF A TRIAL, IN WHICH CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN FREQUENTLY TAMPERS WITH AND WITHHOLDS, EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENDANT.

WITH THOSE THOUGHTS IN MIND, THE BLOGGER SUBMITS HIS PROPOSAL FOR THE NEW MEDINA LOGO:


WHAT BETTER SYMBOL TO SHOW THE WORLD WHERE MEDINA STANDS IN REGARDS TO THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY THAN THE ISIS FLAG?

Friday, January 23, 2015

A REEALLY STUPID ATTEMPT BY LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER, WHO IS CLEARLY NO ROCKET SCIENTIST!

Shown below is the TWENTY-FOURTH installment of the MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT, which LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER and the Republicrats at the Medina County Courthouse, Mosque & Railroad Station do not want you, the citizens, to see.  You can cross-reference any exhibits to the List of Exhibits by "CLICKING" on the link shown directly below "PAGES" at the upper right-hand corner of the web page:



State v. David L. Reed, Medina Case No. 10CR0407

Mr. David Reed was indicted by the Medina County grand jury on August 18, 2010, charging him with two counts of trafficking in drugs(cocaine F-5) and one count of trafficking in drugs(crack cocaine F-4).  On May 13m 2011, Mr. Reed appeared before Judge Collier and entered a plea of “guilty” to two counts of trafficking in drugs (F-5).  On June 24, 2011, Mr. Reed appeared before Judge Collier for sentencing.  According to Mr. Reed, Judge Collier sentenced him to 12 months on Count I and 5 months on Count II, for an aggregate term of 17 months imprisonment.
On July 5, 2011, while still in the Medina County Jail and awaiting transfer to the Ohio Department of Corrections, Mr. Reed, Pro Se, filed Appeal of Sentence Due to Prosecutorial Misconduct and Other Errors at Sentencing.  In his motion, Mr. Reed raised the issue of his illegal sentence with Judge Collier, who sentenced him to 5 months on one of the two counts of conviction.  In his motion, Mr. Reed expressly stated:
I (David Reed) was sentenced to a term of 17 months for (2) F’5 Trafficking in Cocaine. I (David Reed) was sentenced to a 12 month & a five month prison term. 1 of my questions to the court is how can I be sentenced to 5 months when the law states that for F 5’s the minimum is 6 months? 

On September 19, 2011, while still in confinement, Mr. Reed, Pro Se, filed Motion to Amend Sentencing to Make it Conform to Original Sentence or to Vacate Journal Entry and Remand Matter for Resentencing With the Defendant Present.  In this motion, Mr. Reed again asserted that Judge Collier had sentenced him to 12 months on Count I and to 5 months on Count II, to be served consecutively.  Mr. Reed argues thusly:
Under the O.R.C. 2929.11 the sentences for F5 begin at 6 months and proceed by increments of 1 month to a maximum of 12 months. The sentence that was pronounce in open Court was later modified in the Sentencing Judment entry to bring it in line with the law.
.   .   .   .
In effect, Mr. Reed was resentenced without his being present or represented by counsel.  A Trial Court may not use a nunc pro tunc journal entry to correct an illegal sentence that it had imposed upon a defendant in the defndant’s presence.  The journal entry must be vacated and the defendant  must be brought back to Court for resentencing. “Columbus v. Rowland 440 n.e.2D1365,” “State v,. Cavllo No. 59282 8th Dist.,” State v. Walton 583 N.E. 2D 1106.”  Since the sentenced pronounced in open court was illegal it was required by law the (sic) Mr. Reed be present for any future sentencing and the Trial Court abused it (sic) authority in resentencing Mr. Reed withou his being present.  Moreover at the June 22, 2011 sentencing hearing the Trial Court failed in open court to impose a driver’s license suspension but later included it in the sentencing entry.

The State did not oppose Mr. Reed’s motion.  Judge Collier , in a September 20, 2011 Judgment Entry (the day after Mr. Reed filed his motion), Judge Collier quickly dispatched Mr. Reed’s motion with the following questionable language:
The defendant states that the sentencing judgment entry does not reflect the sentence that was stated in open court and on the record.  A review of the court transcript reveals that this is not true.

Mr. Reed has furnished an affidavit averring that Judge Collier, indeed, sentenced him to consecutive 12-month and 5-month sentences in open court.  Mr.Reed requested the transcript of his sentencing hearing from his appellate counsel in June 2014.  To the present date, his appellate counsel has not been forthcoming with his transcript.
On the strength of Mr. Reed’s affidavit, Judge Collier either materially altered the transcript, or the sentencing journal entry, or both.
Copies of Mr. Reed’s motions, Judge Collier’s September 20, 2011  Judgment Entry, and Mr. Reed’s affidavit are attached as Exhibit Twenty-Three.
 

Thursday, January 22, 2015

ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, CONCEALING THE TRUTH

Shown below is the TWENTY-THIRD installment of the MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT, which LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER and the Republicrats at the Medina County Courthouse, Mosque & Railroad Station do not want you, the citizens, to see.  You can cross-reference any exhibits to the List of Exhibits by "CLICKING" on the link shown directly below "PAGES" at the upper right-hand corner of the web page:



.  State v. Frank P. Wood, Medina Case No. 05CR0365

Mr. Frank Wood was tried by jury before Judge Collier on April 24, 2006.  At the conclusion of the trial, Mr. Wood was found guilty of the offenses of rape and gross sexual imposition.  Per the May 15, 2006 docket entry in Mr. Wood’s case, Judge Collier sentenced Mr. Wood to a life term upon conviction of the offense of rape, and three years confinement on the offense of gross sexual imposition, to be served consecutive to the life term.

Mr. Wood sent an unsolicited letter to Inspector Hartman, reporting that his trial transcript had been tampered with and materially altered.  Mr. Wood complained: 1) that the court reporter Donna Garrity had not produced a transcript of the jury selection process; 2) that exculpatory testimony had been deleted from the transcript at Pages 386-387; 3) that a colloquy between Judge Collier and the assistant prosecutor had been deleted from the transcript at Page 479 of the transcript; and 4) the transcript ended suspiciously and abruptly while Judge Collier was in the process of polling the jury during dialogue between the judge and a juror.
Mr. Wood has furnished an affidavit with exhibits, attached hereto as Exhibit Twenty-Two.

ACCORDING TO THE HOEMAN/LAPDOG COLLIER PHILOSOPHY, THIS DEFENDANT DOES NOT DESERVE ANY CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS.  AFTER ALL, THEY CONSIDER HIM TO BE A SEX OFFENDER.  BUT IS HE REALLY?  THE MANNER IN WHICH HOEMAN TRUMPS UP CASES WHERE NO REAL EVIDENCE EXISTS CALLS INTO QUESTION ANY "CONVICTION" COMING OUT OF LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER'S KANGAROO COURTROOM.  JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT MR. WOOD DID NOT RECEIVE A FAIR HEARING ON APPEAL, "PUBLIUS" COLLIER AND DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY, LAPDOG'S MAIN SQUEEZE, GOT TOGETHER NEXT TO THE ROMANTIC GLOW OF GARRITY'S BARBEQUE GAS GRILL AND, HUDDLING CLOSE WHILE LAPDOG BLEW IN GARRITY'S EAR, DELIBERATELY  ALTERED MR. WOOD'S TRANSCRIPTS JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT SOMEONE THEY DEEMED TO BE "GUILTY" WOULD NEVER SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY.  AFTER ALL, SINCE THEY ARE THE SELF-APPOINTED MINISTERS OF "JUSTUS," WHY BOTHER WITH THE NICETIES OF A FAIR TRIAL OR CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS?

IN FACT, IN AN EMAIL MESSAGE "PUBLIUS" COLLIER SENT TO THIS BLOG, HE REMARKED, "THE CONSTITUTION IS JUST SCRAPS OF PAPER.  IT IS NOT RULES, JUST GUIDELINES."  

WHAT A COMPLETE AND TOTALLY MISINFORMED MORON !


LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER IS NO MORE THAN A DOMESTIC TERRORIST WHO IMPOSES SHARIA LAW, WHICH HE APPARENTLY LEARNED WHILE "STUDYING" LAW AT THE MEDINA CAMPUS OF THE SADDAM HUSSEIN UNIVERSITY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES AND "LAW," LOCATED IN THE LOWER LEVEL OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE, MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION.

ALLAHU AHKBAR !!!