HERE'S A RECOMMENDATION FOR NEW MEDINA LOGO !!!

FOLLOWING WAS TAKEN FROM AN EMAIL MESSAGE SENT TO THIS BLOG ON JANUARY 11, 2015:

Main Street Medina seeks design for bicentennial logo

Filed on January 10, 2015 by Gazette staff

Main Street Medina is looking for a logo to celebrate Medina’s bicentennial in 2018. The committee of community leaders will be accepting design proposals until Jan. 30.

The committee is looking for a logo that will look equally good in black and white as well as color. The logo will be used on all print and marketing materials.

The committee indicated it would prefer a logo that does not focus on the Gazebo in Public Square and should include the words “Medina Ohio Bicentennial” as well as the dates “1818-2018” to signify the bicentennial.

No payment is offered, but the winner will be credited for the design. The logo will become the property of the city of Medina and the Bicentennial Committee.

The contest is open to all designers — professionals and hobbyists.

For more information, contact Dawn Conwill, assistant to Medina Mayor Dennis Handwell, at dconwill@medinaoh.org, or call (330) 722-9020.

The deadline for proposals is 5 p.m., Jan. 30.

WELL, IT'S ABOUT TIME THAT MEDINA HAS DECIDED TO "UPDATE" ITS 200 YEAR-OLD LOGO.

CALENDAR YEAR 1818, A MERE 40 YEARS FOLLOWING THE FOUNDING OF THE NATION, WELL PRECEDED THE CIVIL WAR, AND WAS THE TIME THAT THE OHIO VALLEY WAS CONSIDERED THE WESTERN FRONTIER.  NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES STILL FLOURISHED AND WERE REBELLING AGAINST THE DOMESTIC TERRORISM IMPOSED UPON THEM BY THE WASHINGTON POLITICIANS TYPICAL OF THE DAY.   COME TO THINK OF IT, THE QUALITY AND INTEGRITY OF POLITICIANS OVER THE INTERVENING YEARS HAVEN'T CHANGED ALL THAT MUCH, AND CERTAINLY NOT FOR THE BETTER.

GIVEN THE FACT THAT THE DOMESTIC TERRORISTS OVER AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE, MOSQUE AND RAILROAD STATION HAVE DEPRIVED THE LOCAL CITIZENRY OF ALL CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS AND, IN FACT, THE VERY RULE OF LAW, IT IS TIME TO LOOK TO THE FUTURE WHEN CONSIDERING THE NEXT MEDINA LOGO.

NOW, IT IS ABUNDANTLY CLEAR  THAT LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER, WITH THE FULL SUPPORT OF HIS MAIN SQUEEZE DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY, AND INCITED BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN, HAS IMPOSED SHARIA LAW UPON THE CITIZENS OF MEDINA COUNTY.

THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN U.S. LAW AND SHARIA LAW IS RELATIVELY STRAIGHTFORWARD.  UNITED STATES LAW (THAT DOES NOT APPLY IN MEDINA COUNTY) REQUIRES POLICE TO HAVE PROBABLE CAUSE TO BRING CHARGES OF CRIMINAL VIOLATION. ALSO, UNITED STATES LAW REQUIRES THAT STATE TO PROVE A CRIME BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT IN AN OPEN PUBLIC TRIAL GOVERNED BY RULES OF EVIDENCE AND RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (NONE OF WHICH APPLY IN MEDINA COUNTY).

SHARIA LAW HOWEVER PROVIDES THAT A CHARGE CAN BE BROUGHT WITHOUT ANY COMPELLING EVIDENCE OR PROOF, AND THE DEFENDANT IS PRESUMED TO BE GUILTY.  THAT IS THE STATE OF AFFAIRS IN MEDINA COUNTY, ALTHOUGH TO BE FAIR, LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER GIVES DEFENDANTS THE PRETENSE OF A TRIAL, IN WHICH CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN FREQUENTLY TAMPERS WITH AND WITHHOLDS, EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENDANT.

WITH THOSE THOUGHTS IN MIND, THE BLOGGER SUBMITS HIS PROPOSAL FOR THE NEW MEDINA LOGO:

WHAT BETTER SYMBOL TO SHOW THE WORLD WHERE MEDINA STANDS IN REGARDS TO THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY THAN THE ISIS FLAG?

A REEALLY STUPID ATTEMPT BY LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER, WHO IS CLEARLY NO ROCKET SCIENTIST!

Shown below is the TWENTY-FOURTH installment of the MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT, which LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER and the Republicrats at the Medina County Courthouse, Mosque & Railroad Station do not want you, the citizens, to see.  You can cross-reference any exhibits to the List of Exhibits by "CLICKING" on the link shown directly below "PAGES" at the upper right-hand corner of the web page:

State v. David L. Reed, Medina Case No. 10CR0407

Mr. David Reed was indicted by the Medina County grand jury on August 18, 2010, charging him with two counts of trafficking in drugs(cocaine F-5) and one count of trafficking in drugs(crack cocaine F-4).  On May 13m 2011, Mr. Reed appeared before Judge Collier and entered a plea of “guilty” to two counts of trafficking in drugs (F-5).  On June 24, 2011, Mr. Reed appeared before Judge Collier for sentencing.  According to Mr. Reed, Judge Collier sentenced him to 12 months on Count I and 5 months on Count II, for an aggregate term of 17 months imprisonment.

On July 5, 2011, while still in the Medina County Jail and awaiting transfer to the Ohio Department of Corrections, Mr. Reed, Pro Se, filed Appeal of Sentence Due to Prosecutorial Misconduct and Other Errors at Sentencing.  In his motion, Mr. Reed raised the issue of his illegal sentence with Judge Collier, who sentenced him to 5 months on one of the two counts of conviction.  In his motion, Mr. Reed expressly stated:

I (David Reed) was sentenced to a term of 17 months for (2) F’5 Trafficking in Cocaine. I (David Reed) was sentenced to a 12 month & a five month prison term. 1 of my questions to the court is how can I be sentenced to 5 months when the law states that for F 5’s the minimum is 6 months? 

On September 19, 2011, while still in confinement, Mr. Reed, Pro Se, filed Motion to Amend Sentencing to Make it Conform to Original Sentence or to Vacate Journal Entry and Remand Matter for Resentencing With the Defendant Present.  In this motion, Mr. Reed again asserted that Judge Collier had sentenced him to 12 months on Count I and to 5 months on Count II, to be served consecutively.  Mr. Reed argues thusly:

Under the O.R.C. 2929.11 the sentences for F5 begin at 6 months and proceed by increments of 1 month to a maximum of 12 months. The sentence that was pronounce in open Court was later modified in the Sentencing Judment entry to bring it in line with the law.

.   .   .   .

In effect, Mr. Reed was resentenced without his being present or represented by counsel.  A Trial Court may not use a nunc pro tunc journal entry to correct an illegal sentence that it had imposed upon a defendant in the defndant’s presence.  The journal entry must be vacated and the defendant  must be brought back to Court for resentencing. “Columbus v. Rowland 440 n.e.2D1365,” “State v,. Cavllo No. 59282 8^th Dist.,” State v. Walton 583 N.E. 2D 1106.”  Since the sentenced pronounced in open court was illegal it was required by law the (sic) Mr. Reed be present for any future sentencing and the Trial Court abused it (sic) authority in resentencing Mr. Reed withou his being present.  Moreover at the June 22, 2011 sentencing hearing the Trial Court failed in open court to impose a driver’s license suspension but later included it in the sentencing entry.

The State did not oppose Mr. Reed’s motion.  Judge Collier , in a September 20, 2011 Judgment Entry (the day after Mr. Reed filed his motion), Judge Collier quickly dispatched Mr. Reed’s motion with the following questionable language:

The defendant states that the sentencing judgment entry does not reflect the sentence that was stated in open court and on the record.  A review of the court transcript reveals that this is not true.

Mr. Reed has furnished an affidavit averring that Judge Collier, indeed, sentenced him to consecutive 12-month and 5-month sentences in open court.  Mr.Reed requested the transcript of his sentencing hearing from his appellate counsel in June 2014.  To the present date, his appellate counsel has not been forthcoming with his transcript.

On the strength of Mr. Reed’s affidavit, Judge Collier either materially altered the transcript, or the sentencing journal entry, or both.

Copies of Mr. Reed’s motions, Judge Collier’s September 20, 2011  Judgment Entry, and Mr. Reed’s affidavit are attached as Exhibit Twenty-Three.

 

ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, CONCEALING THE TRUTH

Shown below is the TWENTY-THIRD installment of the MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT, which LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER and the Republicrats at the Medina County Courthouse, Mosque & Railroad Station do not want you, the citizens, to see.  You can cross-reference any exhibits to the List of Exhibits by "CLICKING" on the link shown directly below "PAGES" at the upper right-hand corner of the web page:

.  State v. Frank P. Wood, Medina Case No. 05CR0365

Mr. Frank Wood was tried by jury before Judge Collier on April 24, 2006.  At the conclusion of the trial, Mr. Wood was found guilty of the offenses of rape and gross sexual imposition.  Per the May 15, 2006 docket entry in Mr. Wood’s case, Judge Collier sentenced Mr. Wood to a life term upon conviction of the offense of rape, and three years confinement on the offense of gross sexual imposition, to be served consecutive to the life term.

Mr. Wood sent an unsolicited letter to Inspector Hartman, reporting that his trial transcript had been tampered with and materially altered.  Mr. Wood complained: 1) that the court reporter Donna Garrity had not produced a transcript of the jury selection process; 2) that exculpatory testimony had been deleted from the transcript at Pages 386-387; 3) that a colloquy between Judge Collier and the assistant prosecutor had been deleted from the transcript at Page 479 of the transcript; and 4) the transcript ended suspiciously and abruptly while Judge Collier was in the process of polling the jury during dialogue between the judge and a juror.

Mr. Wood has furnished an affidavit with exhibits, attached hereto as Exhibit Twenty-Two.

ACCORDING TO THE HOEMAN/LAPDOG COLLIER PHILOSOPHY, THIS DEFENDANT DOES NOT DESERVE ANY CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS.  AFTER ALL, THEY CONSIDER HIM TO BE A SEX OFFENDER.  BUT IS HE REALLY?  THE MANNER IN WHICH HOEMAN TRUMPS UP CASES WHERE NO REAL EVIDENCE EXISTS CALLS INTO QUESTION ANY "CONVICTION" COMING OUT OF LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER'S KANGAROO COURTROOM.  JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT MR. WOOD DID NOT RECEIVE A FAIR HEARING ON APPEAL, "PUBLIUS" COLLIER AND DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY, LAPDOG'S MAIN SQUEEZE, GOT TOGETHER NEXT TO THE ROMANTIC GLOW OF GARRITY'S BARBEQUE GAS GRILL AND, HUDDLING CLOSE WHILE LAPDOG BLEW IN GARRITY'S EAR, DELIBERATELY  ALTERED MR. WOOD'S TRANSCRIPTS JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT SOMEONE THEY DEEMED TO BE "GUILTY" WOULD NEVER SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY.  AFTER ALL, SINCE THEY ARE THE SELF-APPOINTED MINISTERS OF "JUSTUS," WHY BOTHER WITH THE NICETIES OF A FAIR TRIAL OR CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS?

IN FACT, IN AN EMAIL MESSAGE "PUBLIUS" COLLIER SENT TO THIS BLOG, HE REMARKED, "THE CONSTITUTION IS JUST SCRAPS OF PAPER.  IT IS NOT RULES, JUST GUIDELINES."  

WHAT A COMPLETE AND TOTALLY MISINFORMED MORON !

LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER IS NO MORE THAN A DOMESTIC TERRORIST WHO IMPOSES SHARIA LAW, WHICH HE APPARENTLY LEARNED WHILE "STUDYING" LAW AT THE MEDINA CAMPUS OF THE SADDAM HUSSEIN UNIVERSITY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES AND "LAW," LOCATED IN THE LOWER LEVEL OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE, MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION.

ALLAHU AHKBAR !!!

 

THIS CASE POINTS DIRECTLY AT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN FOR TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE !!!

Shown below is the TWENTY-THIRD installment of the MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT, which LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER and the Republicrats at the Medina County Courthouse, Mosque & Railroad Station do not want you, the citizens, to see.  You can cross-reference any exhibits to the List of Exhibits by "CLICKING" on the link shown directly below "PAGES" at the upper right-hand corner of the web page:

A.  State v. Jeffery Mack, Medina Case No. 03CR0612

Mr. Jeffery Mack was indicted on December 23, 2003.  Mr. Mack’s indictment cannot be publicly viewed at the website of the Clerk of Medina County Court of Common Pleas so that the details of the indictment cannot be cited here with specificity.  Mr. Mack filed motions to suppress various items of evidence on March 5, 2004.[1]  Judge Collier denied Mr. Mack’s motions to suppress evidence on April 30, 2004.

Interestingly, on August 27, 2004, Judge Collier issued Order 1328/237 providing that “the testimony of Ptl. Steve Hoover may be taken by deposition & used as evidence at trial in this matter.”

The docket in Mr. Mack’s case further reveals a September 1, 2004 entry “WARRANT FOR REMOVAL,” #1329/012, which provides, “Sheriff to transport deft. From Cuyahoga County jail to Medina County Sheriff’s Office for a deposition on 9-08-04 at 9:00 am.”

Mr. Mack attended the deposition of Patrolman Steven Hoover conducted at the Medina County Jail on September 8, 2004.

Having failed to prevail on his motions to suppress, on December 13, 2004 Mr. Mack, according to the docket, appeared before Judge Collier and entered guilty pleas to two counts of aggravated robbery, two counts of repeat violent offender specification, and two counts of misuse of credit cards.[2]

On February 25, 2005, Judge Collier sentenced Mr. Mack to an aggregate term of 23 years imprisonment.

Mr. Mack timely appealed his conviction and sentence, State v. Mack, 9^th Dist. No. 05CA0024-M, 2005-Ohio-6325.

Turning now to the express language of the November 30, 2005 Decision of the Ninth District Court of Appeals, State v. Mack, 9^th Dist. No. 05CA0034-M, 2005-Ohio-6325:

            In the case at hand, Defendant maintains that his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to:

            “(1) raise the issue of the altered suppression hearing and videotape deposition transcripts . . . .”  [Emphasis added.]

Regarding Defendant’s allegations of altered evidence, we find no support for his contentions, and thus cannot say that Defendants’ trial counsel prejudiced Defendant for failing to raise an unsubstantiated claim.  Id., at ¶13.

Mr. Mack has furnished an affidavit, with specific citations to the record, averring that the transcript of the deposition testimony of Patrolman Steven Hoover and the transcript of his suppression hearing have been materially altered.

A copy of Mr. Mack’s affidavit is attached hereto as Exhibit Twenty-One.

It is patently clear that, as early as 2003, Judge Collier and his court reported, Donna Garrity, have been deliberately editing and materially altering transcripts of proceedings held before him.

The criminal offense of tampering with transcripts, official records of court proceedings, is so insidious because, in the absence of zealous advocates, the voices of untold numbers of victims of the transcript tampering go unheard and unacknowledged by the Court of Appeals, adding one more injustice done to untold numbers of victims.  Moreover, the average citizen can have absolutely no confidence in the outcome of proceedings where the record has been corrupted and the results are in doubt and under a cloud of suspicion.

---

[1]  The actual date memorializing the suppression hearing does not appear on the docket. It appears from the docket that Judge Collier held a suppression hearing on April 20, 2004 from an ancillary order posted to the docket on April 27, 2004, “Order 1301/504 THE VIDEOTAPE MARKED AND INTRODUCED AT THE SUPPRESSION HEARING HELD 4-20-04 IS HEREBY RELEASED FOR PURPOSES OF COPYING.”

[2] Docket Entry 13/December/2004  CHANGE OF PLEA ENTRY FILED  1346/691-692 Def. informed the Court that his correct name is “Jeffery Mack Lundy.”  The Court granted State’s Motion to strike “Purposely” from “Count II” of indictment. The Deft. Plead “Guilty” to (2) violations of Aggravated Robbery 2911.01(A)(3) (F-1); (2 cts) Repeat Violent Offender Specification 2941.149; and (2 cts) Misuse of Credit Card 2913.21)B)(2) (M-1).  State informed the Court it would recommend a maximum sentence of (23) years.  Def. referred to APD for PSI. Bond set is cont’d. Sentencing is set for 2-14-05 @ 8:30 am. 


A VERY RECENT CASE, STRIKINGLY SIMILAR TO THE CASE OF JEFFERY MACK, IS CURRENTLY PENDING BEFORE LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER AND AGAIN POINTS SQUARELY AT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN FOR TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, A CRIME UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OHIO! 

 

A LOOK BACK OVER THE PAST ELEVEN YEARS AT SOME OF THE CASES IN WHICH LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER HAD UNLAWFULLY ALTERED TRANSCRIPTS

Shown below is the TWENTY-SECOND installment of the MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT, which LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER and the Republicrats at the Medina County Courthouse, Mosque & Railroad Station do not want you, the citizens, to see.  You can cross-reference any exhibits to the List of Exhibits by "CLICKING" on the link shown directly below "PAGES" at the upper right-hand corner of the web page:

Judge Collier and His Court Reporter Have Been Materially

Altering Transcripts For No Less Than The Past Eleven Years.

Inspector Hartman, defense counsel’s investigator and the Defendant’s father, after reading and reviewing the corrupted transcript of Defendant’s first trial, became suspicious that this was not the first case in which Judge Collier and his court reported had engaged in such serious and flagrant misconduct.  Accordingly, Inspector Hartman began reviewing prior decisions of the Ninth District Court of Appeals, finding the appellants had raised issues of corrupted transcripts of proceedings before Judge Collier as early as 2003.

Further, Inspector Hartman began publishing a blog on the Internet, located at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com, which exposed public corruption endemic in the Medina County courts as well as in other Medina County public institutions.  As a feature of his blog, Inspector Hartman requested and received comments from the general public, leading to further evidence of transcript tampering by Judge Collier and Donna Garrity, his court reporter.

In addition to developing the evidence of transcript tampering set out below, Inspector Hartman interviewed a number of other individuals who reported to him that transcripts of proceedings before Judge Collier have been tampered and materially altered, but have refused to furnish affidavits our of fear of reprisal and retribution from Judge Collier and Medina County Prosecutor Dean Holman.