HOW DOES LOCAL "PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR" FACTOR INTO THE HOMICIDE OF BRYON MACRON ????

IN THE COURSE OF A PROTRACTED INVESTIGATION, SUCH AS THE MURDER OF LAFAYETTE TRUSTEE, BRYON MACRON, ALL SORTS OF INTERESTING FACTS SEEM TO BUBBLE TO THE SURFACE. THIS IS JUST ONE CURIOUS FACT THAT HAS NOT YET BEEN ADEQUATELY EXPLAINED.

THE BLOGGER HAS EXTENSIVELY REVIEWED A PLETHORA OF RECORDS AND, IN SO DOING, DISCOVERED THAT, TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO HIS MURDER, BRYON MACRON SPENT AN INORDINATE OF TIME OVER SEVERAL DAYS AT THE HOME OF A LOCAL "PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR" IN MEDINA.

INSOFAR AS THE BLOGGER IS AWARE, THIS "PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR" HAS NOT COME FORWARD WITH ANY INFORMATION TO EXPLAIN HIS MYSTERIOUS CONTACTS WITH BRYON MACRON.

THIS IS BOTH PUZZLING AND CONCERNING?

DID BRYON MACRON REQUEST THE "PROFESSIONAL" SERVICES OF THIS "PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR?"  IF SO, WHY WOULD BRYON MACRON NEED THE SERVICES OF THE "PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR" FOR PERSONAL REASONS?

IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DID BRYON MACRON REQUEST THE "PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR," WHO INCIDENTALLY HAS TIES TO THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM, LOOK INTO SOME IRREGULARITIES AND POTENTIAL CRIMINAL CONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN MEDINA COUNTY?

MOREOVER, DID THE "PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR" BETRAY THE TRUST OF BRYON MACRON AND SPILL THE BEANS TO ONE OR MORE WRONGDOERS WHO THEN DECIDED TO KILL BRYON MACRON?

THAT CERTAINLY SEEMS TO BE A REASONABLE THEORY.

THE BLOGGER BELIEVES IT IS TIME TO CALL THE “PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR” BEFORE A GRAND JURY TO EXPLAIN HIS CONTACTS WITH BRYON MACRON, SO SOON BEFORE MR.MACRON'S MURDER.

OF COURSE, THE "PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR" CAN EASILY CONTACT THE BLOGGER AT THIS BLOG AND WE CAN HAVE A CONFIDENTIAL CONVERSATION ABOUT THIS MATTER, THAT IS IF HE HAS ANY INTEGRITY AT ALL.

THE BLOGGER, HOWEVER, IS NOT HOLDING HIS BREATH. PERHAPS THE "PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR" IS INVOLVED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN THE HOMICIDE OF BRYON MACRON.

TIME WILL TELL!!!!

WAS BRYON MACRON MURDERED BECAUSE HE KNEW GUNS WERE BEING STOLEN FROM THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF’S PROPERTY ROOM AND SOLD TO CIVILIANS ????

AS THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE HOMICIDE OF LATE LAFAYETTE TOWNSHIP TRUSTEE MOVES FORWARD, THE BLOGGER HAS DEVELOPED A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF INFORMATION.

UNLIKE THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEFECTIVES, THE BLOGGER HAS TAKEN THE TIME AND TROUBLE TO INTERVIEW MR. MACRON'S FAMILY, FRIENDS, AND ASSOCIATES.  THOSE INTERVIEWS HAVE DEVELOPED SOME INTERESTING INFORMATION.

AS PREVIOUSLY REPORTED AT THIS BLOG, MR. MACRON OWNED A SEMI-AUTOMATIC PISTOL, WHICH HE CONCEALED IN HIS CAR, AWAY FROM HIS WIFE AND CHILDREN WHO DID NOT EVE KNOW HE HAD THE HANDGUN. OUT OF SIGHT, OUT OF MIND; NO WORRIES ABOUT CURIOUS CHILDREN HANDLING THE GUN.  PLEASE SEE A PRIOR POST AT THIA BLOG, CAPTIONED, WHO STOLE BRYON MACRON'S HANDGUN? EASILY FOUND AT https://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2018/01/who-stole-bryon-macrons-handgun.html


INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED BY THE BLOGGER REVEALED THAT BRYON MACRON INFORMED A NUMBER OF HIS ASSOCIATES THAT HE COULD GET A GOOD DEAL ON SURPLUS GUNS FROM THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE !!!!

THE BLOGGER FOUND THIS INFORMATION TO BE BOTH CURIOUS A INTERESTING. IN THE BLOGGER'S EXPERIENCE, LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES NEVER SELL GUNS TO THE PUBLIC. THE GENERAL PRACTICE BY CREDIBLE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IS TO REMOVE AS MANY FIREARMS FROM CIRCULATION ON THE STREETS.
FIRSTLY, SERVICE WEAPONS ARE DURABLE AND NOT LIKELY TO BE SURPLUSSED EXCEPT AND UNLESS THERE IS A DEPARTMENT-WIDE CHANGE TO A DIFFERENT BRAND AND/OR MODEL OF FIREARM. GENERALLY, THE FIREARMS VENDOR TAKES THE FIREARMS IN TRADE THAT ARE REPLACED BY A NEW ISSUE.

A FERTILE SOURCE OF FIREARMS,HOWEVER, ARISES FROM THE SEIZURE OF FIREARMS  DURING ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS, LIKE DRUG RAIDS. ANY SUCH FIREARMS ARE HELD IN PROPERTY AND, IN THE EVENT OF FIREARMS-RELATED CONVICTION, AND AFTER AN APPEAL HAS RUN ITS COURSE, THE FIREARMS SHOULD BE DESTROYED.

IN THE BLOGGER'S LAW ENFORCEMENT EXPERIENCE, IN A FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, SEIZED FIREARMS, ONCE THE EVIDENTIARY PURPOSE IS SERVED, ARE CONVEYED TO A LOCAL STEEL MILL AND MELTED IN A BLAST FURNACE. DESTRUCTION IS WITNESSED AND CERTIFIED BY A MILL EMPLOYEE AND TWO OR MORE AGENTS WHO WITNESS THE DESTRUCTION.

KNOWING FULL WELL THAT THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE HAS SERIOUS INTEGRITY ISSUES, THE BLOGGER SENT A PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST TO THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S  OFFICE FOR CLARIFICATION AND VERIFICATION.

THE BLOGGER'S PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST IS SHOWN BELOW:

UNSURPRISINGLY, BACA SENT A REPLY TO THE BLOGGER, CLAIMING, "THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE DOES NOT SELL FIREARMS!!!

NOW, IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW THAT MR. MACRON FREQUENTLY RODE OUT AT NIGHT WITH A PARTICULAR SHERIFF'S DEPUTY, NOW RETIRED.

LET'S REASON THIS THROUGH. IF THE OFFICIAL POSITION OF THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE IS THEY DO NOT SELL FIREARMS, AND BRYON MACRON WAS OFFERING ASSOCIATES HE SALE OF "SURPLUS"GUNS FROM THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, THE ONLY CONCLUSION TO BE DRAWN IS THAT SOMEONE FROM THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE WAS OFFERING THE SALE OF FIREARMS STOLEN FROM THE PROPERTY ROOM, LIKELY CERTIFIED AS DESTROYED BUT NOT. EASY AS PIE.

THE QUESTION THEN ARISES AS TO WHETHER THE FIREARM BRYON MACRON HAD BEEN CARRYING WAS ONE OF THOSE STOLEN GUNS AND HE WAS MURDERED FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECOVERING THE GUN AND PREVENTING HIM FROM DISCLOSING THE THEFTS OF GUNS BY SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES.

IF THAT HOLDS TRUE, THEN IT SEEMS OBVIOUS THAT SHERIFF'S PERSONNEL WERE INVOLVED IN THE MURDER OF BRYON MACRON. THAT WOULD CERTAINLY EXPLAIN THE HAPHAZARD "INVESTIGATION" BY SHERIFF'S DEFECTIVES, WHO FAILED TO PERFORM THE MOST BASIC TASKS WHEN BRYON "DISAPPEARED," NOT A GROUND SEARCH, NOT AN AERIAL SEARCH WITH THE DRONE (WHICH THEY HAVE RECENTLY USED TO LOCATE A COUPLE OF KIDS DOING "DONUTS").

PERHAPS THIS EXPLAINS THE COVER-UP OF THE MURDER OF BRYON MACRON!

HOW ABOUT AN INDEPENDENT AUDIT OF THE FINDINGS OF THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS ????

ONCE AGAIN, THE AROMA OF ROTTING FISH IS WAFTING FROM DOWNTOWN MEDINA. DO YOU, DEAR READERS, TRUST THE “FINDING” OF THE MEDINA COUNTY BOARD OF (QUESTIONABLE) ELECTIONS CERTIFYING THAT THERE ARE INSUFFICIENT NUMBERS OF “VALID” SIGNATURES TO PLACE THE ISSUE OF THE ALBATROSS COURTHOUSE BEFORE THE VOTERS IN AN OPEN ELECTION?

THE BLOGGER HAS ZERO TRUST THAT THE BOARD OF (QUESTIONABLE) ELECTIONS ISSUED AN ACCURATE AND HONEST DECISION. YOU HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE BOARD OF (QUESTIONABLE) ELECTIONS IS RUN BY THE SAME REPUBLICRATS WHO ARE DETERMINED TO SHOVE THE ALBATROSS COURTHOUSE DOWN VOTERS’ THROATS.

THIS IS THE SAME CORRUPT BOARD OF (QUESTIONABLE) ELECTIONS THAT FAILED TO FORWARD TO THE OFFICE OF THE OHIO SECRETARY OF STATE THE PETITION OF GREGG DEPEW TO BE PLACED ON THE BALLOT IN HIS ATTEMPT TO RUN FOR COUNTY OFFICE.

WHO CAN BE TRUSTED IN MEDINA COUNTY GOVERNMENT?

NOT A SINGLE SOUL, IN THE BLOGGER’S OPINION!

IT IS TIME FOR AN INDEPENDENT AUDIT BY AN IMPARTIAL PARTY TO VERIFY AND CERTIFY THE QUESTIONABLE “FINDINGS” OF THE MEDINA COUNTY BOARD OF (QUESTIONABLE) ELECTIONS.

THAT WAY VOTERS CAN DECIDE WHETHER CROOKED PROSECUTORS AND CERTAIN CORRUPT JUDGES MERIT THE LUXURY OF A NEW AND UNNECESSARY ALBATROSS COURTHOUSE.

DIMWITTED LOCAL TAX-AND-SPEND POLITICIANS COME UP WITH ANOTHER HARE-BRAINED SCHEME TO FINANCE THE NEWLY PROPOSED AND COMPLETELY UNNECESSARY ALBATROSS COURTHOUSE!!!’

THESE LOCAL POLITICIANS ARE JUST ITCHING TO SPEND YOUR MONEY.  LOTS AND LOTS OF MONEY. THE MORE THEY SPEND, THE BIGGER THE KICKBACKS. LOCAL PROBATE JUDGE KEVIN DUMM IS A PARTICULARLY COMPELLING CASE ON POINT.

REGULAR READERS OF THIS BLOG MAY RECALL THE BLOGGER EXPOSED DUMM FOR PUSHING A NEW CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FROM TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, A FIRM IN WHICH DUMM’S WIFE IS SAID TO HAVE A PERSONAL AND FINANCIAL INTEREST. DUMM PUSHED FOR TYLER’S CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, WHICH OUTPRICED COMPETITORS’ BIDS BY A COUNTRY MILE-MORE THAN ONE MILLION DOLLARS PER YEAR. OF COURSE THE EXORBITANT COSTS ARE PAID BY TAXPAYERS.

CAN YOU SAY “CONFLICT OF INTEREST?”  JUDGE DUMM SEEMS TO HAVE RUN A “NO-ETHICS” CAMPAIGN SO AS TO DRAIN HIS PERSONAL PIGGY BABK, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE PUBLIC COFFERS OF MEDINA COUNTY.

OF COURSE, THE QUESTION ARISES AS TO JUST HOW GOOD IS TYLER’S SOFTWARE. THE ANSWER SEEMS TO BE “NOT VERY.”

SETTING ASIDE THE COMPLAINTS OF OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES, READERS NEED ONLY LOOK MUCH CLOSER TO HOME.

THE BLOGGER HAS BEEN INFORMED THAT MEDINA COUNTY “EXECUTIVE” SCOTT MILLER PURCHASED TYLER SOFTWARE FOR THE MEDINA COINTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THE SAD TRUTH IS THAT TYLER’S SOFTWARE JUST DOESN'T DELIVER THE GOODS. THE BLOGGER HAS BEEN INFORMED THAT BUILDING DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES HAVE BEEN LOCKED OUT IF THE SYSTEM AND ARE UNABLE TO CONDUCT COMPUTER-ASSISTED BUSINESS OF THE DEPARTMENT.

IT IS PRETTY CLEAR THAT DUMM AND MILLER HAVE LAID AN EGG, GOLDEN THOUGH IT MAY BE, WITH THE PURCHASE OF TYLER SOFTWARE.

NOW COMES THE LATEST PUBLIC FIASCO.

THE BLOGGER HAS LEARNED THAT THESE LOCAL TAX-AND-SPEND POLITICIANS HAVE FORMULATED A PLAN TO FINANCE THE PROPOSED ALBATROSS COURT HOUSE, A FRIVOLITY AT BEST, WITH TAX REVENUES DERIVED FROM THE UNWANTED PIPELINE THAT RUNS THROUGH THE COUNTY!!!

THESE POLITICIANS SPEND IT BEFORE THEY GET IT.

THE BLOGGER ADVANCES AN IDEA NEVER CONSIDERED BY THESE TAX-AND-SPEND POLITICIANS. HOW ABOUT WE SUBMIT A DECISION ON THE ALBATROSS COURTHOUSE TO THE VOTERS, INVEST ANY FUTURE TAX REVENUES DERIVED FROM THE PIPELINE (PLACING MEDINA COUNTY ON A NEWFOUND SOLID FINANCIAL FOOTING) AND PAY COUNTY EMPLOYEES A LIVING WAGE.

NO NEED TO INCLUDE THE MORONS AT THE SHERIFF’S OFFICE IN TGAT SCHEME. THOSE MORONS ARE ALREADY PAID HANDSOMELY TO THE LEVEL OF THEIR INCOMPETENCE AND HAVE GOTTEN ALL THESE NEW CARS SO THEY CAN RIDE IN STYLE TO DUNKIN’ DONUTS.

SHERIFF'S DEPUTY UNWITTINGLY CONCEDES IN SWORN TRIAL TESTIMONY THAT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY "JUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER HAS MATERIALLY ALTERED THE TRANSCRIPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS !!!!

KARMA HAS A FUNNY WAY OF TURNING THE WORM!

MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES ROUTINELY LIE AS IF IT'S THEIR SWORN DUTY TO FRAME AS MANY INNOCENT CITIZENS AS POSSIBLE SO AS TO NOT DISAPPOINT THEIR CORRUPT SUPERVISORS AND SUPERIORS.  THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR YEARS.  OF COURSE, WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM A "SYSTEM" THAT EMBRACES CORRUPT PROSECUTORS AND JUDGES LIKE "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER?

SHERIFF'S DEPUTY DOUGLAS CLINAGE, IN SWORN TESTIMONY IN THE THIRD AND FINAL TRIAL OF THE INNOCENT MAN RAILROADED BY THIS COLLECTIVE OF DIRTBALLS, UNWITTINGLY PROVED THAT "WEASELPECKER" AND DONNA GARRITY, "WEASELPECKER'S" OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER WITH BENEFITS, DELIBERATELY AND MATERIALLY ALTERED AN "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS, IN VIOLATION OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OHO.

TAKE A LOOK AT AN EXCERPT FROM THE BLOGGER'S COMPLAINT TO THE OHIO SUPREME COURT PERTAINING TO "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER.

Collier denied Matthew Hartman’s 7/30/2009 Motion to Suppress on the absurd rationale that the return of a grand jury indictment cures violations of the Fourth Amendment by sheriff’s deputies. Collier denied Matthew Hartman’s Motion to Suppress despite the facts that sheriff’s deputies lacked probable cause to make the arrest and that Deputy Clinage admitted in testimony that he had not sworn to the criminal complaint in this case that lacked a statement of essential facts required by Crim. Rule 3 and the Fourth Amendment.  

At Volume II of the materially altered suppression hearing transcript, p. 243, the corrupted transcript presents the following passage of altered testimony purportedly offered by Deputy Douglas Clinage:

A. I don’t remember. In all honesty, I don’t. It was - - it was a complicated night.

Q. What was complicated?

A. Originally, he was not arrested for the burglary. 

           [Emphasis added to material alteration]

Thereafter in the corrupted transcript, Collier added the non-existent purported testimony of Deputy Clinage to the transcript:

Q,       What was he arrested for?

A.`       Originally, he was arrested for domestic violence, three charges of menacing, and two other charges, I believe.

From there, after contacting my supervisor and talking it over with the group that was all there, it was decided that the misdemeanors should be alleviated and we should go forward - - go with the burglary charge, because he walked in the house with a weapon.

Deputy Clinage never spoke these words in his suppression testimony, which Collier later attributed to him in the corrupted transcript.  See Tr., Suppression Hearing, Vol. II, at 243-244.

In fact, the actual testimony of Clinage given at the suppression hearing was as follows:

A.  I don’t remember. In all honesty, I don’t. It was - - it was a complicated night.

Q.Why was it complicated?

A. The charge kept changing. [Emphasis added.]

Collier materially altered the actual testimony of Deputy Clinage that clearly demonstrated the sheriff’s deputies lacked probable cause and that, as a matter of law, everything the deputies seized from Matthew Hartman at the time of his unlawful arrest was inadmissible as evidence where Clinage was unable to articulate the grounds for the arrest at the moment of arrest.

More than one year prior to the date Garrity filed the deliberately, materially altered transcript of Hartman I in the Court of Appeals, Matthew Hartman memorialized the actual testimony of Deputy Clinage in Matthew’s December 17, 2009, Additional Authorities brief.

At the Suppression Hearing, Deputy Douglas Clinage testified that the evening of May 27, 2009 was a “complicated night” because the criminal “charge kept changing.” Obviously because the arresting officers had not even identified the specific crime for which they arrested Matthew, it was not possible for them to have identified the particular elements for that offense. Similarly, not having identified any offense and its elements before placing Matthew under arrest, it was not possible for the officers to have satisfied the probable cause standard that Matt had violated each of those elements. When the arresting officer has not considered the precise nature of the offense he believes has been committed, it is simply not possible for him to have made an arrest based on probable cause, because he obviously has not and cannot have satisfied himself that the arrested person probably committed acts that violated all of the element of a criminal offense. [Emphasis added.]

Additional Authoritiesbrief, at 6-7.

The above-cited passage from Matthew Hartman’s Additional Authorities brief guided Collier to the precise passage of Deputy Clinage’s testimony that Collier needed to materially alter to conceal and cover up the incontrovertible fact, among other, that sheriff’s deputies lacked probable cause to make the arrest and that, under controlling legal authorities, all items seized from Matthew at the time of his unlawful arrest were inadmissible at trial.  Of course, Collier needed to materially alter the transcript to conceal and cover up his unconscionable denial of Matthew Hartman’s meritorious motion to suppress, which he attempted to accomplish by materially altering the transcript of the suppression hearing testimony of Deputies Telatko and Clinage.

In Hartman III, much like Deputy Telatko, Deputy Clinage confirmed by his testimony that Collier had materially altered the transcript of his testimony at the suppression hearing. When asked if he recalled his prior testimony in a prior proceeding to the effect that “the charge kept changing, Clinage responded in the affirmative.  See Tr., Hartman III. APX 792.  See also Supplement to Correct Transcripts, at pp. 9-13; Exhibits Three, Four.

The uncontroverted sworn testimony of Sheriff’s Deputy Douglas Clinage, the State’s witnesses, at trial in Hartman III proves beyond any doubt that Collier materially altered the transcript of the suppression hearing testimony of Deputies Telatko and Clinage with the intent to support his unconscionable denial of Matthew Hartman’s motion to suppress.[1]

---

[1]Collier’s court reporter Donna Garrity lacks the knowledge and sophistication to know what passages of testimony to materially alter to effect the intended outcome of Matthew Hartman’s appeal.

BELOW IS SHOWN THE ACTUAL TRANSCRIPT PAGE OF CLINAGE'S TRIAL III SWORN TESTIMONY, ADMITTING THAT "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER UNLAWFULLY EDITED THE TRANSCRIPT OF CLINAGE'S ACTUAL TESTIMONY AT THE SUPPRESSION HEARING.

NOT MUCH DOUBT ABOUT IT NOW, IS THERE?

SLEAZY AKRON ATTORNEY GIVES JUDGE THE SWEAT OFF HIS BALLS!!!!

YOU JUST CANNOT MAKE THIS UP! SLEAZY AKRON ATTORNEY GIVES JUDGE COSGROVE THE SWEAT OFF HIS BALLS!!!

IT SHOULD COME AS NO SURPRISE TO REGULAR READERS OF THIS BLOG THAT THE BLOGGER HOLDS THE MAJORITY OF ATTORNEYS IN LOW REGARD FOR A WHOLE HOST OF REASONS.  HERE IS ANOTHER PERFECT EXAMPLE.

ON AUGUST 8, 2019, THE  BLOGGER APPEARED AT A HEARING BEFORE JUDGE PATRICIA COSGROVE IN A MATTER PERTAINING TO THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME EXECUTED BY LOCAL DIRTBAG ATTORNEYS, MEMBERS OF THE MEDINA MOB.

SPECIFICALLY, JUDGE COSGROVE CONDUCTED THE HEARING TO ASSESS WHETHER TO ASSESS SANCTIONS AGAINST THE JAGOFF ATTORNEY REPRESENTING PARTIES ADVERSE TO MR. GREGG DEPEW, A VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME.

THE BLOGGER OFFERED HIS TESTIMONY, WHICH WAS REASONABLY STRAIGHTFORWARD.  ESSENTIALLY, THE JAGOFF ATTORNEY ALLEGED IN COURT FILINGS, LACKING A GOOD FAITH BASIS, THAT GREGG DEPEW IS THE AUTHOR OF THIS BLOG, CLEARLY A BULLSHIT CLAIM.

THE BLOGGER TOOK TO THE WITNESS STAND AND TESTIFIED THAT HE IS THE AUTHOR AND PUBLISHER OF THIS BLOG, NOT GREGG DEPEW.

NEXT IT WAS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR THIS SLEAZEBALL ATTORNEY, WHO WAS ACTUALLY PRESENT TO REPRESENT THE INTERESTS OF THE JAGOFF ATTORNEY, TO CROSS-EXAMINE THE BLOGGER.

IT TURNS OUT, AS EXPECTED, THAT THIS SLEAZEBALL ATTORNEY IS A LIGHTWEIGHT AND DID NO MORE THAN ASK A NUMBER OF LEADING (ACTUALLY MISLEADING) QUESTIONS, AGAIN LACKING A GOOD FAITH BASIS.  THE QUESTIONS WERE BULLSHIT AND THE BLOGGER RESPONDED ACCORDINGLY.

THE SLEAZEBALL ATTORNEY WAS TYPICALLY ARROGANT AND, AT ONE POINT, REFERRED SARCASTICALLY TO THE BLOGGER AS, "MR. BLOGGER." THE BLOGGER'S INITIAL REACTION WAS TO REFER TO THIS SLEAZEBALL AS "MR. SHYSTER."  HOWEVER, OUT OF RESPECT FOR THE COURT, THE BLOOGGER CHOSE NOT TO SINK TO THE LEVEL OF THIS SLEAZEBALL AND REFRAINED.

FOLLOWING HIS TESTIMONY, THE BLOGGER WAS DISMISSED AND LEFT THE COURTROOM, MISSING THE REAL ACTION.

ACCORDING TO GREGG DEPEW, THE SLEAZEBALL ATTORNEY, FOR NO EXPLAINABLE REASON, SMUGGLED TWO COMPACT DISCS INTO THE COURTHOUSE/COURTROOM, CONCEALED IN HIS JOCKEY SHORTS.

WHEN IT CAME TIME FOR THIS SLEAZEBALL ATTORNEY TO OFFER THE COMPACT DISCS TO THE JUDGE, HE FISHED DOWN INTO HIS PANTS AND SEARCHED FOR THE DISCS IN HIS SHORTS.

AS THIS SLEAZEBALL ATTORNEY SEARCHED HIS SHORTS, AROUND HIS JOHNSON, ONE DISC SLID DOWN HIS PANT LEG AND FELL ONTO THE COURTROOM FLOOR. LOL!

ULTIMATELY HE LOCATED THE OTHER COMPACT DISC NESTLED IN HIS JOCKEY SHORTS NEXT TO THIS JOHNSON AND, VOILA, HE PRODUCED THE DISC FROM HIS SHORTS AND HANDED IT TO THE JUDGE.

ALONG WITH THE COMPACT DISC, THIS SLEAZEBALL ATTORNEY GAVE JUDGE COSGROVE THE SWEAT OFF HIS BALLS!

ANOTHER FINE EXAMPLE OF COURTROOM DEMEANOR BY A "MEMBER" OF THE BAR,

LOL!

MEDINA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PLAYING THE SHELL GAME WITH REAL ESTATE AT SUBSTANTIAL COST TO TAXPAYERS!!!

MEDINA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PLAYING THE SHELL GAME WITH REAL PROPERTY AT SUBSTANTIAL COST TO TAXPAYERS, LINING THE POCKETS OF PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS AND "SILENT" PARTNERS!
THERE'S BIG PROFIT FOR PRIVATE INTERESTS IN MEDINA COUNTY "GOVERNMENT" IF YOU ARE ONE OF THE PRIVILEGED FEW MEMBERS OF THE GOOD OLD BOY NETWORK AND THE MEDINA MOB.

MEDINA BANK ONE BUILDING

BANK ONE, FORMERLY LOCATED AT 60 PUBLIC SQUARE, HAD CLOSED UP SHOP AND MOVED ON.  MEDINA COUNTY THEREAFTER RENTED THE PREMISES AT 60 PUBLIC SQUARE AND PROVIDED THOSE QUARTERS TO "OHIO-MEANS-JOBS," A SUBSIDIARY OF MEDINA COUNTY JOBS AND FAMILY SERVICES.

AT A LATER DATE, MEDINA COUNTY PURCHASED THE OLD BANK ONE BUILDING AT 60 PUBLIC SQUARE.

 COUPLE OF QUESTIONS IMMEDIATELY ARISE:

- HOW MUCH RENT DID MEDINA COUNTY PAY AND TO WHOM DID THEY PAY IT? 

- FROM WHOM DID MEDINA COUNTY PURCHASE THE BUILDING AND      HOW MUCH DID THEY PAY FOR IT?

IS THE MEDINA COURTHOUSE REALLY TOO CROWDED AND DO WE REALLY NEED A NEW ONE AT AN EXORBITANT COST TO TAXPAYERS?

MEDINA'S FINE "PUBLIC SERVANTS," LED BY PROBATE JUDGE KEVIN DUMM, WHO ALREADY STANDS TO MAKE A BUNDLE FROM THE UNNECESSARY AND UNWANTED CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND WHO WILL UNDOUBTEDLY PROFIT HANDSOMELY FROM THE BUILDING OF THE PROPOSED  NEW COURTHOUSE, HAVE DECLARED THE CURRENT COURTHOUSE IS JUST TOO SMALL AND TOO CROWDED.

BULLSHIT! HAVE YOU, THE READERS, EVER WITNESSED THE COURTHOUSE JAM-PACKED WITH PEOPLE? NEVER HAPPENED!  THE PRESENT COURTHOUSE IS MORE THAN ADEQUATE TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THE CITIZENS OF MEDINA COUNTY, PARTICULARLY WITH CROOKED JUDGES LIKE "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER AND KEVIN DUMM WITH THEIR WORTHLESS FAT ASSES SEATED ON THE BENCH!

MEDINA PROSECUTOR MOVES OUT OF THE COURTHOUSE, MAKING PLENTY OF EXTRA ROOM!

FORREST THOMPSON, MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR, HAS MOVED HIS ENTIRE OPERATION (FOR WANT OF A BETTER TERM) TO THE OLD BANK ONE BUILDING AT 60 PUBLIC SQUARE, MAKING PLENTY OF ROOM IN THE COURTHOUSE!

PROBLEM SOLVED . . . SORT OF!

GIVEN THAT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR FORREST THOMPSON HAS MOVED INTO 60 PUBLIC SQUARE, HE HAS DISPLACED THE WORKFORCE OF THE MEDINA JOBS AND FAMILY SERVICES' AFFILIATE PROGRAM "OHIO-MEANS-JOBS."  WHAT TO DO WITH THOSE COUNTY EMPLOYEES?

AS  IT TURNS OUT, "OHIO-MEANS-JOBS" WORKFORCE HAS BEEN MOVED PERMANENTLY INTO THE COURTHOUSE.  HOW ABOUT THEM APPLES. THEY CLAIM THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ROOM TO CONDUCT COURT BUSINESS IN THE COURTHOUSE WHILE, AT THE SAME TIME, PERMANENTLY PLACING THE WORKFORCE OF THE MEDINA COUNTY "OHIO-MEANS-JOBS" INTO THE ALLEGEDLY OVERCROWDED BUILDING.

YOU CAN BET JUDGE DUMM AND THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, PARTICULARLY BULLSHIT ARTIST BILL HUTSON, HAVE BEEN TRYING TO SELL  THE PUBLIC A BILL OF GOODS!

WHAT ABOUT THE $3 MILLION TAXPAYER DOLLARS THEY INTEND TO PISS AWAY ON "TEMPORARY"COURT QUARTERS?

JUDGE DUMM AND THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS HAVE BEEN NOTICEABLY SILENT ON THE ISSUE OF TEMPORARY QUARTERS FOR THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT FUNCTIONS DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROPOSED PINK ELEPHANT.

HERE'S THE SCOOP ON THAT ISSUE!

ACCORDING TO INFORMED SOURCES, VARIOUS COURT PERSONNEL ARE EXPECTED TO BE DISPLACED FROM THE OLD COURTHOUSE FOR AN ESTIMATED 3 YEARS WHILE CONSTRUCTION IS ONGOING AT THE MEDINA COUNTY PINK ELEPHANT.

A DECISION HAS BEEN MADE TO RELOCATE THOSE FUNCTIONS AND PERSONNEL TO THE OLD LITCHFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FOR THREE YEARS AT A REPORTED COST TO TAXPAYERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3 MILLION!

YOU CAN BET THERE IS SOMETHING GOING ON IN THE BACKGROUND TO ENRICH SOMEBODY WITH CLOUT.

THE LITCHFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WAS SOLD TO A PRIVATE CITIZEN TO THE TUNE OF $150,000.00.  ALL OF A SUDDEN, THAT BUILDING IS NO WORTH A COOL $3 MILLION.  THE BLOGGER WOULD SURE LIKE TO KNOW THE IDENTITIES OF THE SILENT PARTNERS IN THE ORIGINAL SALE OF THE BUILDING, LIKELY NOT AN ARMS-LENGTH SALE.

AN HONEST GOVERNMENT WOUD NOT BE TAKING TAXPAYERS TO THE CLEANERS WITH A NEEDLESS EXPENDITURE OF $3 MILLION. IF THE COUNTY TRULY NEEDS THE OLD LITCHFIELD ELEMENTARY,THEY SOULD HAVE TAKEN CUSTODY OF THE BUILDING BY EXERCISING EMINENT DOMAIN AND PAYING THE CURRENT OWNER FAIR MARKET VALUE FOR THE PROPERTY, WHICH WOULD SEEM TO BE $150,000.00.

THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE UNNEEDED MEDINA COUNTY PROPOSED COURTHOUSE NEEDS TO BE PUT ON THE BALLOT AND DECIDED BY VOTERS RATHER THAN BY "PUBLIC SERVANTS" SEEKING TO LINE THEIR OWN POCKETS WITH TAXPAYERS' MONEY.