WHAT HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, ANOTHER STUPID CRIMINAL, IS TRYING TO CONCEAL FROM THE PUBLIC: ISSUE #4 - UNLAWFUL TAMPERING WITH THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT

Turning now to the fourth issue that HOLMAN THE CORRUPT AND LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, STUPID CRIMINALS BOTH, definitely want to conceal from the public:

           The Medina County Prosecutor and/or the Trial Court Colluded With Medina Court Reporters to Produce a Tainted “Official” Transcript of the Proceedings, in Their Entirety, by Tampering With, Altering, and Amending the Transcript, Thus Violating the Laws of the State of Ohio, Specifically ORC §§2913.42(A)(1), 2913.42(A)(2), and 2913.42(B)(4), Felony Offenses of the Third Degree.

Medina Court Reporters, a Medina County firm, is under contract with the trial judge Collier to provide court-reporting services.  Defense counsel and her investigator have detected, and continue to detect, material alterations to the “official” transcript of proceedings, all calculated and designed to deprive Petitioner of a fair hearing on his direct appeal and his Petition for Post Conviction Relief.  The level and degree of misconduct by the Medina County Prosecutor, however, was so pervasive that, by excising all of that misconduct from the transcript, there would be no transcript at all.  Nevertheless, the tampering, material alteration, and amendment to the “official” transcript was carried out, in part, with the specific intent of depriving Petitioner of his claim that he was deprived of his constitutional rights under the Confrontation Clause in that the trial judge prohibited defense counsel from fully and fairly cross-examining the State’s witnesses.  Such prohibition effectively emasculated Petitioner’s right to confront and examine his accusers.  Denial of the “right of effective cross-examination” is “constitutional error of the first magnitude” requiring reversal.  Davis v Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315-318 (1974).

            In Petitioner’s post-conviction Motion for Acquittal, filed with the court on November 23, 2009, defense counsel attached her sworn declaration enumerating the court’s “errors” at trial, and pointing to issues, expected to be raised on appeal.  A copy of defense counsel’s sworn declaration, as attached to Petitioner’s Motion for Acquittal, is appended hereto as Exhibit 9.

            On December 17, 2009, Petitioner filed his Additional Authorities and Exhibits in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Acquittal, once again pointing to issues, expected to be raised on appeal, in greater detail.  One of many issues identified was the trial court’s denial of Petitioner’s constitutional rights to effective cross-examination of the State’s witnesses, accorded to him under the Confrontation Clause and buttressed by Davis v Alaska, Id.

            On December 27, 2010, after receiving no fewer than eight extensions of time, the court reporter filed the tainted “official” transcript of the proceedings with the Clerk of the Ninth District Court of Appeals.  Attorney Robert Dixon was appointed by the trial court to represent Petitioner on his direct appeal.  Subsequently, at a much later date, Mr. Dixon made the tainted “official” transcript of the proceedings to Petitioner’s trial counsel who, under time pressures and constraints, prepared and timely filed the Petition for Post Conviction Relief as provided by ORC §2701.03(D)(1).

            Following the timely filing of the Petition for Post Conviction Relief, defense counsel and her investigator more thoroughly reviewed the “official” transcript of the proceedings and discovered the transcript had been tampered with, materially altered, and amended, with the obvious intent to deny and deprive Petitioner a fair hearing on appeal and on his Petition. Petitioner’s counsel briefed this Court with respect to the manifold inaccuracies and omissions in the “official” transcript in Petitioner’s Motion to Correct Transcripts, filed on August 4, 2011, and in Petitioner’s Reply to State’s Opposition to Correct the Record; Opposition to States’ Motion to Disqualify Petitioner’s Counsel, filed on September 8, 2011, which provide examples of specific portions of testimony that are curiously and suspiciously missing from the “official” transcript.

            More recently, Petitioner’s counsel has detected even more suspicious omissions for the transcript of the suppression hearing, at Pages 180 and 243 of the suppression hearing transcript, discussed at Section V (C) of this brief, supra.

            Further, Petitioner has filed sworn proof of certain omissions from the “official” transcript in the form of the Affidavit of Paul M. Hartman, previously attached to Petitioner’s Motion to Correct Transcripts, and appended hereto as Exhibit 10.

Also, defense counsel has attached to Petitioner’s Reply to State’s Opposition to Correct the Record; Opposition to States’ Motion to Disqualify Petitioner’s Counsel Page 56 from the Formal Complaint of Judicial and Prosecutorial Misconduct filed by Petitioner’s father with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Ohio Supreme Court on or about January 11, 2011, well prior to the time that defense counsel had access to the “official” transcripts.  In his complaint, Petitioner’s father makes reference to comments made on the record at the time of Petitioner’s sentencing on January 29, 2010.  The well-remembered comments from the trial judge are curiously missing from the “official” transcript.  A copy of Page 56 of the Formal Complaint of Judicial and Prosecutorial Misconduct, as attached to Petitioner’s brief filed on September 8, 2011, is appended hereto as Exhibit 11.

            While Petitioner has advanced proof, including sworn proof that the “official” transcript has been tampered, materially altered, and amended, the prosecutor has failed to advance any countervailing evidence to challenge or dispute Petitioner’s evidence.

SINCE THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME THAT HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, LAPDOG COLLIER AND MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY HAVE TAMPERED WITH AND MATERIALLY ALTERED A TRANSCRIPT, THEY DO NOT WANT ANY OTHER INNOCENT CITIZENS WHOM THEY RAILROADED TO RAISE SIMILAR ISSUES.  BESIDES, THEY MOST CERTAINLY WISH TO AVOID THE FEDERAL PRISON TERMS WHICH THEY ARE DESERVEDLY DUE.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

IT GETS WORSE FOR LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL

In the very prior post at this blog, readers were shown undeniable proof that LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, and MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY have materially altered the transcript of the suppression hearing testimony of sheriff's deputy Frank Telatko by excising a rather large portion of Telatko's testimony, beginning at Page 179 of the corrupted transcript.


By removing certain portions of the suppression hearing testimony of sheriff's deputies Douglas Clinage and Frank Telatko, and specifically Telatko's testimony that "WE ARRESTED HIM (DEFENDANT) SO WE COULD SORT IT OUT LATER," LAPDOG COLLIER, THE STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, BELIEVED HE WAS "HOME FREE" WITH THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS AND THE COURT OF APPEALS WOULD DENY THIS INNOCENT MAN A FAIR HEARING ON HIS DIRECT APPEAL.


If there were no testimony to the effect that sheriff's deputies lacked probable cause to arrest this innocent defendant, LAPDOG COLLIER "reasoned,"the Ninth District Court of Appeals would not be able to criticize LAPDOG COLLIER for failing to suppress obvious illegally seized evidence.


It hasn't worked out that way, however, because this innocent defendant's trial attorney and investigator have read the corrupted transcripts and detected NUMEROUS UNLAWFUL MATERIAL ALTERATIONS TO THE TAINTED "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT, ALL CALCULATED AND DESIGNED TO DENY THIS INNOCENT MAN A FAIR HEARING ON HIS APPEAL, AND TO KEEP HIM UNLAWFULLY IMPRISONED.


To further complicate LAPDOG COLLIER'S now tenuous grip on his lifetime political appointment to the Medina County bench, LAPDOG COLLIER and MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY forgot about and failed to excise a portion of the trial testimony of  sheriff's deputy Frank Telatko, referencing his prior testimony at the October 9, 2009 suppression hearing that, "WE TOOK HIM INTO CUSTODY SO WE COULD SORT IT OUT LATER."


PICTURED BELOW IS PAGE 369 OF THE CROSS-EXAMINATION OF THE TRIAL TESTIMONY OF FRANK TELATKO:

At lines 17-24 of the trial testimony of Telatko, defense counsel asked him:

       "All right.  And on October 9^th, when you testified, do your remember being asked this questions and giving this answer?            “What did you arrest him for?”
            And you said, “I don’t know,” you wanted to take him into custody and sort it our later?            Do you remember saying you were going to say you were going to “sort it out later?”  

 SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, lodged an immediate objection, of course.


NOTWITHSTANDING HIS BEST, BUT BUMBLING EFFORTS, LAPDOG COLLIER, THE STUPID CRIMINAL, FAILED TO REMOVE ALL TRACES OF TELATKO'S SUPPRESSION TESTIMONY, AS DEMONSTRATED ABOVE.

STUPID CRIMINALS MAKE STUPID MISTAKES.  LAPDOG COLLIER IS NO EXCEPTION TO THE RULE!

LAPDOG COLLIER IS INDEED JUST ONE MORE STUPID CRIMINAL!


THIS IS BUT ONE MORE EXAMPLE OF LAPDOG COLLIER'S CRIMINAL CONDUCT IN TAMPERING WITH AND MATERIALLY ALTERING THE CORRUPTED TRANSCRIPT.


THE CRIME?  TAMPERING WITH RECORDS, A FELONY OFFENSE OF THE THIRD DEGREE.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

MORE EVIDENCE OF ANOTHER "STUPID CRIMINAL MOVE" BY LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL

The blogger has once again had the occasion to exclaim, "There's LAPDOG COLLIER, THE STUPID CRIMINAL," as the blogger detected yet one more "STUPID CRIMINAL MOVE" by LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER as yet another material alteration to the trial transcript of the corrupted trial of this innocent railroaded into prison by LAPDOG COLLIER.  


THE MATERIAL ALTERATION OF THE CORRUPTED TRANSCRIPT, KNOWINGLY FILED BY MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY, LITERALLY JUMPED OFF THE PAGE AND SHOUTED, "THERE'S LAPDOG COLLIER, THE STUPID CRIMINAL!"


Medina ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR,  called sheriff's deputy Frank Telatko, who like sheriff's deputy Clinage received his advanced police training from the Keystone Cops, to testify at the hearing before LAPDOG COLLIER on this innocent defendant's Motion to Suppress the evidence seized from this innocent citizen incident to his unlawful arrest.

During cross-examination, Defense Counsel asked Telatko, who personally arrested this innocent defendant:

"What was he arrested for?"

Deputy Telatko testified, in reply:

"We arrested him so we could sort it out later!" 

By his very own sworn testimony, Telatko admitted that, as a matter of law, he did not have probable cause to arrest this innocent defendant.


The law does not permit an officer to make an arrest, and later figure out whether a crime, if any,has been committed, or, as Telatko testified, to "sort it out later.


Upon hearing this testimony from Telatko, an honest judge should have, and would have, suppressed any and all evidence and statements of this innocent defendant as flowing from an illegal arrest for want of probable cause.  LAPDOG COLLIER DID NOT SUPPRESS THE ILLEGALLY SEIZED EVIDENCE!  BUT THEN AGAIN, LAPDOG COLLIER IS NOT AN HONEST JUDGE!


More to the point, the blogger has scoured the transcript of the suppression hearing and has found that Telatko's testimony that, "We arrested him so we could sort it out later," HAS UNLAWFULLY BEEN REMOVED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT BY LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER AND MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY!


WHAT, THE READER MAY ASK, IS THE PROOF?


Obviously, LAPDOG COLLIER, by removing any trace of Telatko's testimony, believed he had absolved himself of his unethical conduct since Telatko's damning testimony has simply disappeared!


But, alas, LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, HAS PROVEN HIMSELF TO BE A STUPID CRIMINAL ONCE AGAIN!


Although LAPDOG COLLIER and COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY unlawfully excised that portion of the transcript that had memorialized Telatko's testimony, they created a disjointed an incongruous gap in the suppression transcript of Telatko's testimony at Pages 179 - 180, pictured below:

 

These two pages from the corrupted transcript of the suppression hearing are quite revealing of the tampering and material alterations of the "official" transcript by LAPDOG COLLIER and MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY.

After inquiring of Telatko about his assigned duty weapon, defense counsel asked Telatko, at the bottom of Page 179:

"In addition to the three of you coming from the south side where all these trees are how many other officers responded that day?"

At the top of Page 180, Telatko testified in reply:

"There was two other officers north of the residence, and another officer that was south of us." 

Immediately thereafter, at Page 180, the tainted and corrupted transcript records an objection from SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR:

"The motion to suppress has nothing to do with whether he's been read Miranda or whether he's advised of his rights and what statements he made.  It has nothing to do with the 9-1-1 tape."

A diligent review of the corrupted "official" transcript disclosed that the cross-examination of Telatko began at Page 176 of the suppression hearing transcript.

Nowhere, between pages 176 and 180 of the suppression hearing transcript, ALL OF TELATKO'S TESTIMONY ON CROSS-EXAMINATION, did defense counsel ever question Telatko about "WHETHER (THE DEFENDANT'S) BEEN READ MIRANDA, OR WHETHER HE'S BEEN ADVISED OF HIS RIGHTS AND WHAT STATEMENTS HE MADE," OR THE "9-1-1 TAPE."


On the face of this corrupted record, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, is objecting to matters NOT IN THE RECORD OF THE CROSS-EXAMINATION OF FRANK TELATKO!


The objection by SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, is out of the context and completely incongruous with the cross-examination, on the corrupted record, occurring prior to the objection.

IT IS PERFECTLY CLEAR FROM PAGES 179 & 180 OF THE CORRUPTED TRANSCRIPT OF THE SUPPRESSION HEARING THAT LAPDOG COLLIER AND MEDINA COURT REPORTED DONNA GARRITY HAVE EXCISED A GOOD PORTION OF TELATKO'S TESTIMONY REGARDING THE FAILURE OF TELATKO TO GIVE THE COMPLETE MIRANDA WARNINGS AND TELATKO'S CONSIDERATION OF THE INACCURATE INFORMATION PROVIDED TO HIM BY THE 9-1-1 DISPATCHER.


IT IS ALSO CLEAR THAT THIS IS THE POINT IN THE TESTIMONY THAT LAPDOG COLLIER AND MEDINA COURT REPORTED UNLAWFULLY EXCISED TELATKO'S TESTIMONY, "WE ARRESTED HIM SO WE COULD SORT IT OUT LATER."


THIS BUMBLING EXCISION OF A BLOCK OF TELATKO'S TESTIMONY FROM THE SUPPRESSION HEARING TRANSCRIPT IS A BRILLIANT TESTAMENT TO THE FACT THAT LAPDOG COLLIER IS, INDEED, NOTHING MORE THAN A STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

WHERE'S WALDO?

As most readers of this blog are aware, young children are often challenged by an amusing game called "Where's Waldo?"

The game is relatively simple, but challenging at the same time.  The game presents a large picture with depictions of Waldo concealed within.  The objective of the game, of course, is to find as many hidden pictures of Waldo as possible.

The blogger has engaged in a similar pursuit in recent times, although the game is called, "WHERE'S LAPDOG COLLIER, THE STUPID CRIMINAL?"


Here is how the game works.

As the blogger has continued to pore over the corrupted transcripts of the trial and related proceedings of the innocent citizen railroaded into prison by LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, AND ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, suddenly a material alteration or omission from the transcript literally jumps out from the page.


At each of those moments, the blogger has an immediate epiphany and recognizes,  "THERE'S LAPDOG COLLIER, THE STUPID CRIMINAL!"


IT IS TRULY AMAZING HOW FREQUENTLY THE BLOGGER HAS COME TO RECOGNIZE AND EXCLAIM, "THERE'S LAPDOG COLLIER, THE STUPID CRIMINAL" IN THE PAGES OF THE CORRUPTED TRANSCRIPT.


MUCH MORE TO COME....

ANOTHER CITIZEN STEPS FORWARD TO ACCUSE LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, OF TAMPERING WITH ANOTHER "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT

The ongoing series of crimes by LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL and one of his criminal accomplices MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY, along with HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, is starting to bubble to the surface.


Yesterday, the blogger received information from a Medina County citizen who reported that LAPDOG COLLIER, THE STUPID CRIMINAL, had tampered with, materially altered, and changed another one of those DONNA GARRITY "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPTS.


According to the citizen, a young male family member was indicted by the Not-so Grand Jury of Medina, which returned yet another one of those infamous Medina County infamous CONSTITUTIONALLY DEFECTIVE INDICTMENTS.


The young man, through his defense attorney, engaged in those HOLMANESQUE BAIT-AND-SWITCH PLEA AGREEMENTS.  [See prior post, captioned THE ART OF THE FIX AND THE COUBLE-CROSS IN MEDINA COURT, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/art-of-fix-and-couble-cross-in-medina.html ]


The young man agreed to plead guilty to one count of a two-count indictment, in exchange for which the office of HOLMAN THE CORRUPT agreed to dismiss the second count, with the expressly agreed sentence range of 6 months to one year.

The young man appeared in Kangaroo Courtroom No. 1 before THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER, for a change of plea.  The young man withdrew his not guilty plea and pled guilty to the amended one-count indictment,

According to the young man, LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, stated in open court and ON THE RECORD, that the young man pled guilty under the condition that, in part, he was expecting to receive a sentence within the range of 6 months to one year.

However, when he appeared for sentencing, LAPDOG COLLIER SENTENCED THE YOUNG MAN TO A TERM OF 4 YEARS IMPRISONMENT.


THAT, OF COURSE, IS DEMONSTRATIVE OF THE ART OF THE FIX AND DOUBLE-CROSS IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS.


Understandably outraged, the young man, who was deceived into pleading guilty by the promise of a sentence within the 6 month to 1 year range, turned to the "official" transcript of his sentencing hearing.

Lo and Behold!  The remarks of LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, documenting the young man had been induced to plead guilty in exchange for a sentence within the range of 6 months to one year, had been UNLAWFULLY EXCISED FROM THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT OF THE CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING, FILED BY MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY.


LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, AND MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY HAVE OBVIOUSLY ENGAGED IN THE GAME OF MATERIALLY ALTERING "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPTS WITH IMPUNITY FOR SOME LONG WHILE.


IS THERE ANY DOUBT THAT A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR AND COURTS BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IS IN ORDER?

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR PUTS ALL BLAME ON LAPDOG COLLIER FOR TAMPERING WITH THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT

As regular readers are well aware, this blog has presented UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE THAT LAPDOG COLLIER AND HIS ACCOMPLICES HAVE TAMPERED WITH AND ALTERED THE "OFFICIAL" TRIAL TRANSCRIPT OF THE INNOCENT MAN WHO HE HAD RAILROADED INTO PRISON, ALL FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRESERVING HIS LIFETIME UNCONTESTED POLITICAL APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT, COMPLIMENTS OF DEM PROSECUTOR HOLMAN THE CORRUPT AND THE MEDINA DEM PARTY.

Like rats scurrying from a sinking ship, the CRIMINALS WHO OPERATE KANGAROO COURTROOM NO. 1 at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station are starting to point fingers ... AT EACH OTHER!


In the latest wrinkle of the saga of the corruption endemic in the Medina County Courts, a rift has developed between CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and his lackey, LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.


HOLMAN THE CORRUPT has apparently decided to throw LAPDOG COLLIER under the bus.
After all, it was LAPDOG COLLIER who railroaded innocent citizens, wasn't it?
So goes the misplaced reasoning of HOLMAN THE CORRUPT.


HERE'S THE LATEST SCOOP:


Given the fact that this blog has presented undeniable proof that the trial transcript of this innocent citizen has been tampered with and materially altered, it is clear that NONE OF THE COMMON CRIMINALS WHO OPERATE KANGAROO COURTROOM NO. 1 ARE WILLING TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR CRIMINAL CONDUCT.


THE ULTIMATE QUESTION, TO BE PROVEN IN FEDERAL COURT, IS JUST WHO CONSPIRED WITH MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY TO KNOWINGLY FILE A FALSE AND CORRUPTED TRIAL TRANSCRIPT IN THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS.


Clearly, LAPDOG COLLIER is involved because MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY is under contract to LAPDOG COLLIER and would not file the corrupted transcript without his consent and authorization.


Were HOLMAN THE CORRUPT and ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR involved in the willful tampering and material alteration to the tainted "official" transcript?

It would seem so, since SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, sent an email to this blog claiming to "know" that the direct appeal of this innocent man would be denied by Ninth District Court of Appeals.  THAT REALLY WAS A "STUPID CRIMINAL" MOVE!
[See prior post, captioned SALISBURY ADMITS LAPDOG JUDGE CHRIS COLLIER TAMPERED WITH AND MATERIALLY ALTERED THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2012/01/salisbury-admits-lapdog-judge-chris.html ]

The office of HOLMAN THE CORRUPT has recently filed a brief in opposition to this innocent citizen's Motion for Bond, pending disposition and resolution of his direct appeal and Petition for Post Conviction Relief.

In his Opposition brief, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT boldly asserted:

"(Defense counsel) has claimed that the State engaged in certain practices or has performed certain acts that never occurred.... (Defense counsel) has claimed that the State has colluded with the court reporter.... At no point did the State collude with the court reporter."

GIVEN THE FACT THAT THE TAINTED "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT HAS BEEN PROVEN TO HAVE BEEN TAMPERED WITH AND MATERIALLY ALTERED, AND FURTHER GIVEN THAT HOLMAN THE CORRUPT DENIES THAT NEITHER HE NOR HIS OFFICE HAD ANY PART IN THE TAMPERING AND MATERIAL ALTERATIONS TO THE TRANSCRIPT, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT LAYS ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE UNLAWFUL TAMPERING AND MATERIAL ALTERATIONS TO THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT SQUARELY AT THE FEET OF LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER, HOLMAN'S 
"PAVLOV DOG," WHICH MAY VERY WELL BE TRUE.


SO MUCH FOR HONOR AMONG THIEVES!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

MORE UNDENIABLE PROOF-POSITIVE THAT LAPDOG COLLIER AND HIS CRIMINAL ACCOMPLICES IN KANGAROO COURTROOM NO. 1 HAVE TAMPERED WITH THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT

Presented here is just a little more undeniable proof that the common criminals who operate Kangaroo Courtroom No. 1 at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station, including LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, AND ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, HAVE CONSPIRED TO TAMPER WITH, MATERIALLY ALTER, AND CHANGE THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT OF THE INNOCENT CITIZEN WHOSE CASE IS BEING PROFILED AT THIS BLOG.


As previously shown at this blog, LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, AND SALISBURY THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR are indeed STUPID CRIMINALS.


HERE IS A CASE IN POINT:


LAPDOG COLLIER, THE STUPID CRIMINAL.  prior to the corrupted trial of this Defendant, conducted a four-part suppression hearing over a period of approximately twelve weeks.  Any uninterrupted suppression hearing should take no more than one full day, at most.  LAPDOG COLLIER, by his dilatory tactics, intended to deprive this innocent citizen of his CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A FAIR AND SPEEDY TRIAL.


During the suppression hearing, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR called two Medina County Sheriff's deputies to testify, both of whom had received their advanced police training from the KEYSTONE COPS, even though both finished at the bottom of the class.


During her cross-examination at the suppression hearing, defense counsel asked Keystone Deputy Clinage, who just had testified that the night of this innocent citizen's unlawful arrest had been "complicated":

"What was complicated?"

Clinage then replied in his testimony:

"The charge kept changing." 

The above-cited testimony of Keystone Deputy Douglas Clinage proves unequivocally that these Keystone deputies lacked probable cause to arrest this innocent citizen since Clinage was unable to state with certainty the criminal offense for which this innocent man had been arrested!


ON DECEMBER 17, 2009, Defense counsel filed Additional Authorities and Exhibits in Support of Defendant's Motion for Acquittal, found at the website of the Clerk of the Medina County Kangaroo Court of Common Pleas at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=77 .

At the bottom of Page 6 in Defendant's Additional Authorities and Exhibits in Support of Defendant's Motion for Acquittal, Defense counsel quoted the testimony given by Clinage at the suppression hearing:

"At the Suppression Hearing, Deputy Douglas Clinage testified that the evening of May 27, 2009 was a "complicated night" because the criminal "charge kept changing."

It is clear, that by filing her brief, defense counsel presented and asserted the SUPPRESSION HEARING testimony of Keystone Deputy Douglas Clinage to LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER to prove that these KEYSTONE COPS from the Medina County LACKED PROBABLE CAUSE TO ARREST THIS INNOCENT CITIZEN, WHO LAPDOG COLLIER RAILROADED INTO PRISON.


FULLY RECOGNIZING THE HE HAD BEEN CAUGHT RED-HANDED DEPRIVING THIS INNOCENT MAN A FAIR TRIAL, LAPDOG DID THE ONLY REASONABLE THING A SLEAZY ATTORNEY LIKE LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER COULD DO!


LAPDOG COLLIER MATERIALLY ALTERED AND CHANGED THE TRANSCRIPT, JUST LIKE ANY OTHER SLEAZY ATTORNEY MIGHT DO!


SHOWN BELOW IS A COPY OF PAGE 243 FROM THE TAINTED AND MATERIALLY ALTERED "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT OF THE SUPPRESSION, FILED BY COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY WITH THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ON DECEMBER 27, 2010 , MORE THAN ONE YEAR AFTER DEFENSE COUNSEL NOTIFIED LAPDOG COLLIER, IN HER DECEMBER 17, 2009 BRIEF DEMONSTRATING, UNEQUIVOCALLY THAT THIS INNOCENT CITIZEN WAS UNLAWFULLY ARRESTED BY KEYSTONE DEPUTIES FROM THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, WHO HAD NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ARREST HIM:

Readers will take note of the fact that the materially altered transcript, filed by Medina Court Reporter Donna Garrity with the Ninth District Court of Appeals, tampered with, materially altered, and changed by LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, now reads at Lines 13-17:

Answer:     I don't remember.  In all honesty, I don't.  It was - - it was a complicated night. 

Question:   What was complicated? 

Answer:     Originally, he was not arrested for burglary.

CLINAGE'S TESTIMONY THAT, "THE CHARGE KEPT CHANGING," HAS BEEN UNLAWFULLY REMOVED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT!

So, dear readers, you have been presented with proof-positive that MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY HAS FILED A TAINTED TRANSCRIPT WITH THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS THAT HAD BEEN TAMPERED WITH, MATERIALLY ALTERED, AND CHANGED BY LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THAT STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, ALL FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRESERVING HIS LIFETIME UNCONTESTED POLITICAL APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH, ACCOMPLISHED BY ATTEMPTING TO DEPRIVE THIS INNOCENT CITIZEN OF A FAIR HEARING ON HIS DIRECT APPEAL AND IN HIS PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF, AND KEEPING AN INNOCENT CITIZEN UNLAWFULLY IMPRISONED.

IT WILL BE A FINE DAY WHEN LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, AND SALISBURY THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR ARE FINALLY SAFELY ENSCONCED BEHIND THE WALLS OF A FEDERAL PRISON FOR ALL OF THEIR MANY CRIMES AGAINST INNOCENT CITIZENS, WHERE THEY CAN DO NO MORE HARM!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

MEDINA COURT REPORTERS, INC. SAYS "HAVE IT YOUR WAY!"

The motto of Medina Court Reporters, Inc., of Medina, Ohio is "Have it your way," as LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, knows full well.
In fact, LAPDOG COLLIER has availed himself of this unique service provided locally by ONLY MEDINA COURT REPORTERS, INC.


A commercial listing for Medina County Court Reporter's Inc. can be found at http://local.yahoo.com/info-15635675-medina-court-reporters-incorporated-medina;_ylt=AvwOJQjuRJCcl4kE8dAAcT2HNcIF;_ylv=3?csz=Medina%2C+OH

This listing may come in handy if you need the record of any hearing or deposition changed or materially altered!


REMEMBER, MEDINA COURT REPORTERS, INC. MEAN WHAT THEY SAY.  THEY WILL BE SURE THAT YOU GET YOUR RECORD YOUR WAY, NO MATTER THE TRUE AND ACTUAL TESTIMONY.


The website of the Ohio Secretary of State discloses the following registration for Medina Court Reporters, Inc. at http://www2.sos.state.oh.us/pls/bsqry/f?p=100:7:3745184921197806::NO:7:P7_CHARTER_NUM:917716 :

The Articles of Incorporation for Medina Court Reporters, Inc. at the website of the Ohio Secretary of State at http://www2.sos.state.oh.us/reports/rwservlet?imgc&Din=5272_0937 .

As the reader can plainly see form these official records of the Ohio Secretary of State, DONNA GARRITY IS BOTH AN INCORPORATOR AND THE STATUTORY AGENT OF MEDINA COURT REPORTERS, INC., UNDER CONTRACT WITH LAPDOG COLLIER TO PROVIDE COURT REPORTING SERVICES.


IN FACT IT WAS DONNA GARRITY WHO, UNDER OATH, KNOWINGLY FILED THE TAINTED "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT THAT HAD BEEN TAMPERED WITH, MATERIALLY ALTERED, AND CHANGED BY LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.


PICTURED BELOW IS A CERTIFICATION OF THE TAINTED TRANSCRIPT THAT DONNA GARRITY FILED IN THE CASE OF THE INNOCENT MAN WHO HAD BEEN RAILROADED INTO PRISON BY LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, and ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR:

 READERS WILL NOTE THAT DONNA GARRITY HAS CERTIFIED THAT SHE HAS NO "INTEREST" IN THE MATTER BEFORE LAPDOG COLLIER.


That certification of  DONNA GARRITY PROVES TO BE PATENTLY FALSE!


DONNA GARRITY HAS PLAYED A PIVOTAL ROLE IN MATERIALLY ALTERING THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT IN THE CASE BEING PROFILED AT THIS BLOG.


SOME PEOPLE, LIKE DONNA GARRITY AND LAPDOG COLLIER, A STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, WILL DO ANYTHING FOR MONEY, INCLUDING SACRIFICING PERSONAL INTEGRITY!  (NOT THAT LAPDOG COLLIER HAD ANY PERSONAL INTEGRITY TO BEGIN WITH!)


If you are an attorney and need to have a record read your way, notwithstanding the testimony of an adverse party, call DONNA GARRITY at MEDINA COURT REPORTERS, INC.  JUST TELL HER LAPDOG COLLIER SENT YOU.


If, on the other hand, you are a witness being deposed by an attorney of the adverse party, and you see that DONNA GARRITY is doing the recording/reporting, my best advice is to just get up and leave because GARRITY can and will tamper with the transcript, IF THE PRICE IS RIGHT!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG COLLIER, THE STUPID CRIMINAL, SLICES AND DICES MORE OF THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT

As if this blog has not yet proven that LAPDOG COLLIER tampered with and materially altered the trial transcript of the innocent man who LAPDOG COLLIER railroaded into prison, all for the purpose of preserving his grip on his lifetime uncontested political appointment to the Medina County bench, HERE IS YET MORE PROOF OF LAPDOG COLLIER'S CRIMINAL CONDUCT, specifically, TAMPERING WITH RECORDS, A FELONY OFFENSE OF THE THIRD DEGREE.


 Following the innocent defendant's conviction at trial for the offense of Aggravated Burglary With the Intent to Commit Disorderly Conduct, resulting exclusively from the egregious and widespread prosecutorial misconduct of SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR. and by the egregious and widespread pattern of judicial misconduct by LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, LAPDOG COLLIER sentenced this innocent man to a term of 5 years imprisonment for an offense of which he factually innocent.


As LAPDOG COLLIER prepared to sentence this innocent man, LAPDOG COLLIER stated, on the record, that he was denying this defendant's meritorious post-conviction motions, including a Motion for a New Trial, "ALTHOUGH THERE ARE NUMEROUS GROUNDS." (A precise quote.)

On January 11, 2011, well prior to the time the tainted "official"transcripts, filed by MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY on December 27, 2010, were available to even this innocent defendant's appellate attorney, this defendant's father, a highly decorated and honorably retired Federal law enforcement officer, filed a Formal Complaint of Judicial Misconduct by Judge Christopher Collier with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Ohio Supreme Court.


The Formal Complaint of Judicial Misconduct by Judge Christopher Collier memorialized LAPDOG COLLIER'S remark at sentencing that LAPDOG was denying this defendant's post-conviction motions "ALTHOUGH THERE ARE NUMEROUS GROUNDS."


A COPY OF PAGE 56 OF THE FORMAL COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT BY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, MEMORIALIZING LAPDOG COLLIER'S REMARK, IS PICTURED BELOW.

INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, AND NOT AT ALL SURPRISING AT THIS POINT, LAPDOG COLLIER'S REMARK THAT HE WAS DENYING THIS INNOCENT DEFENDANT'S POST-CONVICTION MOTIONS "ALTHOUGH THERE ARE NUMEROUS GROUNDS" HAVE BEEN UNLAWFULLY EXCISED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT.


PICTURED BELOW IS PAGE 4 OF THE CORRUPTED TRANSCRIPT, FROM WHICH LAPDOG COLLIER'S REMARK HAS BEEN UNLAWFULLY EXCISED AT LINES 11-16 :

PRESTO!  LAPDOG COLLIER'S remark that this innocent man had advanced his meritorious post-convictions upon "NUMEROUS GROUNDS" has simply DISAPPEARED FROM THE RECORD!


PICTURED BELOW IS THE CERTIFICATION OF MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY falsely certifying that the corrupted transcript of the sentencing hearing is "a full and complete transcription."

It is obvious now why LAPDOG COLLIER is content to make so many ignorant and moronic comments at trial.  HE JUST MATERIALLY ALTERS THE TRANSCRIPTS AND WIPES  AWAY HIS COMMENTS BEFORE THE TRANSCRIPTS GO FORWARD TO THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS!


JUST HOW MANY MATERIALLY ALTERED TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS , DO YOU SUPPOSE, THAT LAPDOG COLLIER AND MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY HAVE FILED WITH THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS?


YOU CAN BET THAT THIS IS NOT THE FIRST!


THIS, HOWEVER, IS EVIDENCE OF JUST ONE MORE "STUPID CRIMINAL MOVE" BY LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, TOWN WHORE, AND STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL.


LAPDOG COLLIER AND DONNA GARRITY HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GET AWAY WITH THIS ... UNTIL NOW!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

SALISBURY ADMITS LAPDOG JUDGE CHRIS COLLIER TAMPERED WITH AND MATERIALLY ALTERED THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT

As is obvious by now, LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE is nothing more than another SLEAZY ATTORNEY AND COMMON CRIMINAL, too old to chase after ambulances.


The same can be said of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DINO HOLMAN and his ASS. PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.  HOLMAN and SALISBURY are two more SLEAZY ATTORNEYS who command and control LAPDOG COLLIER in LAPDOG COLLIER'S KANGAROO COURTROOM NO. 1 over at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station.


CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, like LAPDOG COLLIER, is just too old to chase after ambulances...any more.   

SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR. on the other hand, is just TOO LAZY to chase after ambulances, although he possesses the all of the proper qualifications.


Now, given the obvious that LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, DINO HOLMAN, THE CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR, and ASS. PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR are all nothing more than common criminals, no one ever said they were SMART COMMON CRIMINALS.


Here is just one of many examples that demonstrate that LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN, THE CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR, and ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR are really nothing more than STUPID COMMON CRIMINALS!


PICTURED BELOW IS AN EMAIL THAT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, SENT TO THE BLOG:

NOW, ONE MUST BE GIVEN TO WONDER HOW SALISBURY MIGHT ACTUALLY "KNOW" THAT THIS INNOCENT DEFENDANT'S APEAL WILL FAIL.

The answer to that question is now CRYSTAL CLEAR.

IN HIS MESSAGE TO THE BLOG, SALISBURY HAS ACTUALLY ADMITTED THAT HE HAS ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, HAS TAMPERED WITH AND MATERIALLY ALTERED THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT  OF THIS INNOCENT MAN!

ARE LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN, and SALISBURY nothing more than common criminals?

Yes!

ARE LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN, and SALISBURY SMART COMMON CRIMINALS?

NO!

IN FACT, LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN, and ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY are truly nothing more than STUPID COMMON CRIMINALS!

LIKE ALL STUPID COMMON CRIMINALS, LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, AND SALISBURY THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR have done precisely what MOST STUPID COMMON CRIMINALS DO!

LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, AND SALISBURY THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR tried to conceal and cover up  their CRIMES!

In a desperate bid to avoid being permanently being disbarred by the Ohio Supreme Court and, even more importantly to them, IN A FRANTIC BUT UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPT TO AVOID PRISON, LAPDOG COLLIER AND HIS CRIMINAL ACCOMPLICES AT THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE HAVE TAMPERED WITH AND MATERIALLY ALTERED THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT OF THE INNOCENT MAN WHOSE CASE IS PROFILED AT THIS BLOG.

THERE IS NO GREATER PROOF THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, AND SALISBURY THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR HAVE RAILROADED THIS INNOCENT MAN THAN UNDENIABLE PROOF THAT THEY HAVE TAMPERED WITH, MATERIALLY ALTERED, AND CHANGED THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT!

THESE THREE COMMON CRIMINALS WILL SOON BE FITTED FOR PRISON KHAKIS, AFTER THEY PLEAD THEIR CASES BEFORE A FEDERAL JUDGE AND JURY!

AS FOR SUING THE BLOGGER FOR "DEFLAMATION," THESE THREE COMMON CRIMINALS WILL HAVE TO DO IT FROM FEDERAL PRISON!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

A SURPRISE CHRISTMAS GIFT FOR LAPDOG JUDGE CHRIS COLLIER FROM MEDINA COURT REPORTERS

Medina Court Reporters, the local court reporting service under contract to LAPDOG COLLIER to provide court reporting services for the many and varied tainted proceedings in KANGAROO COURTROOM NO. 1 at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station, has come up with a novel and useful Christmas gift for LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.


It is certainly regrettable that, after so many years of corrupting the Medina County justice system, LAPDOG COLLIER has finally been CAUGHT RED-HANDED TAMPERING WITH A TRIAL RECORD.


Apparently LAPDOG COLLIER thought he could get away with this crime undetected for many years to come, as he has in past years.


ALAS, THE JIG IS UP!


However, with no real remorse, Medina Court Reporters has gifted LAPDOG COLLIER in the fashion pictured below:

The above-pictured knitting kit will be treasured by LAPDOG COLLIER for years to come!


LAPDOG COLLIER WILL BE ABLE TO KNIT SOCKS FOR HIMSELF AND A SCARF OR TWO IN HIS DORMITORY AT ONE OF THE FABULOUS CAMPS OPERATED BY THE U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS WHILE LAPDOG COLLIER IS ON "VACATION" FROM MEDINA FOR THE NEXT FEW YEARS.


The blogger is certain that gift is most appreciated by LAPDOG COLLIER, given in the spirit of the Christmas Season.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG COLLIER CAUGHT AGAIN TAMPERING WITH A TRANSCRIPT?

A review and analysis of the docket of David Reed presents another interesting development, suggesting more nefarious conduct by LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.


On September 19, 2011, Mr. Reed filed a motion with LAPDOG COLLIER to vacate his unlawful sentence and to re-sentence him in accord with the law of the State of Ohio.


Pictured below is Mr. Reed's motion filed with LAPDOG COLLIER:

As the reader can plainly see, Mr. Reed alleges that LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, sentenced Mr. Reed to 12 months on Count 1 and to 5 months on Count 2, for a total of 17 months to be served.  Mr. Reed then complains that, after his sentencing hearing, someone drew LAPDOG COLLIER'S imposed sentence of 5 months on Count 2 was unlawful and that LAPDOG COLLIER unilaterally changed the docketing entry to conform with statute, thus effectively changing Mr. Reed's sentence to 11 months on Count 1 and to 6 months on Count

2, all outside the presence of Mr. Reed.

GIVEN LAPDOG COLLIER'S COMPLETE LACK OF HONESTY AND INTEGRITY, MR. REED'S CLAIM IS QUITE BELIEVABLE.

Pictured below is LAPDOG COLLIER'S denial of Mr. Reed's motion, establishing once again that LAPDOG COLLIER is unable to read with any reasonable level of comprehension:

As the reader can tell, LAPDOG COLLIER CLAIMS TO HAVE REVIEWED THE "RECORD" ("OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT") and dismissed Mr. Reed's motion on the basis that Mr. Reed was in court at the time that LAPDOG COLLIER pronounced the sentence imposed by CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DINO HOLMAN.


Two issues immediately jump out at the reader:
1)  LAPDOG COLLIER completely avoids the primary issue of unlawfully changing the structure of Mr. Reed's sentence outside the presence of Mr. Reed; and
2)  LAPDOG COLLIER claims he reviewed the "record."


LAPDOG COLLIER'S second claim, that he reviewed the record, raises another interesting questions:
1)  Did LAPDOG COLLIER really review the record?
2)  Does the actual record support Mr. Reed's contention?


MORE IMPORTANTLY, HAS LAPDOG COLLIER TAMPERED WITH, ALTERED, AND AMENDED THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT TO COMPORT WITH HIS DOCKETED ENTRY, JUST AS HE TAMPERED WITH, ALTERED, AND AMENDED THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE BEING PROFILED AT THIS BLOG?


ONLY THE OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, UNDER CONTRACT TO LAPDOG COLLIER, KNOWS THE TRUTH ABOUT THAT, AND SHE'S NOT TALKING, AT LEAST IN THE PRESENT MOMENT.


MUCH MORE TO COME ...

LAPDOG COLLIER FINDS HOLIDAY SHOPPING A NIGHTMARE!

As the Holiday Seasons approaches, LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, has found that holiday shopping has been quite upsetting for him.

Reports have been received that LAPDOG COLLIER has been quite upset over all of the tamper-proof packaging he has found in the store of many of the local merchants.

LAPDOG COLLIER is quoted as saying to one bewildered clerk, "What's the matter?   Don't they trust me?"

The unequivocal answer to that question is, NO, LAPDOG COLLIER CANNOT BE TRUSTED IN EVEN THE MOST MINOR OF MATTERS!


GIVEN THE FACT THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, HAS TAMPERED WITH THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT OF THE PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE BEING PROFILED AT THIS BLOG, AND LIKELY MANY MORE, IT WOULD BE WISE TO AVOID ANY OF THE SHOPS THAT LAPDOG COLLIER IS KNOWN TO FREQUENT.


NOTWITHSTANDING THOSE STANDARD PRODUCT SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, LAPDOG COLLIER WILL FIND A WAY AROUND THEM, JUST LIKE HE'S FOUND AN UNLAWFUL WAY TO DEFEAT  THE APPEALS OF THOSE INNOCENT CITIZENS WHOM HE HAS WRONGLY CONVICTED AND RAILROADED, BY TAMPERING WITH TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS!


THIS IS A SUPERB REASON THAT COMPELS AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

JUST HOW MANY TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS HAVE LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER & HIS CRONIES TAMPERED WITH AND CHANGED OVER THE YEARS?

In reviewing the corrupted "official" transcript of the case being profiled here at the blog, it is interesting to note that all of the identified omissions from the transcript of the case being profiled here at this blog FAVOR LAPDOG COUNTY JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE!


HOW ABOUT THAT?  SIMPLY COINCIDENCE?  THIS BLOGGER THINKS NOT!


Given the fact that there is unequivocal proof that the "official" trial transcript has been CORRUPTED, TAMPERED WITH, AND ALTERED, a very serious question now arises.


JUST HOW MANY OTHER TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS, IN YEARS PAST, HAVE BEEN CORRUPTED, TAMPERED WITH, AND ALTERED BY THE COMMON CRIMINALS OPERATING OVER THERE IN COURTROOM NO. 1 AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION?


THIS BLOGGER BELIEVES THAT THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION IS MANY, THUS CALLING INTO QUESTION APPELLATE DECISIONS IN WHICH APPEALS HAVE BEEN DENIED,


TO BE SURE, ONLY LAPDOG COLLIER KNOWS FOR SURE!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG COLLIER TRIED TO CONCEAL HIS UNLAWFUL CONDUCT AND BIASED RULINGS FROM THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

As has been previously shown at this blog, the "official" trial transcript, in the case being profiled here at the blog, has been unlawfully tampered with, altered, and changed, OMITTING TESTIMONY AND REMARKS FROM LAPDOG COLLIER.


One of the remarks of LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, was intentionally excised from the transcript in an attempt to conceal the bias and unlawful rulings made by LAPDOG COLLIER at this Defendant's sentencing hearing!


Following this Defendant's unlawful conviction in KANGAROO COURTROOM NO. 1 at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station, presided over by LAPDOG COLLIER, Defense Counsel filed a Motion for a New Trial, which cannot be found publicly displayed at the website of the Medina County Clerk of Court BECAUSE LAPDOG COLLIER DOES NOT WANT TO REVEAL ALL OF HIS MISCONDUCT AT TRIAL, POINTED OUT IN DEFENSE COUNSEL'S BRIEF SUPPORTING THE MOTION FOR  NEW TRIAL.


At this Defendant's sentencing hearing, LAPDOG COLLIER denied the Defendant's Motion for a New Trial, as he grudgingly admitted "ALTHOUGH THERE ARE NUMEROUS GROUNDS."


That was a direct admission from LAPDOG COLLIER that he denied this Defendant's meritorious motion for a new trial in spite of the NUMEROUS GROUNDS JUSTIFYING A NEW TRIAL.


Of course, LAPDOG COLLIER'S ADMISSION THAT THIS DEFENDANT MERITS A NEW TRIAL IS  NOW CURIOUSLY MISSING FROM THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT.


WHAT A SURPRISE THAT LAPDOG COLLIER DOES NOT WANT THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS TO NOTICE THAT HE UNCONSCIONABLY AND UNLAWFULLY DENIED THIS DEFENDANT A NEW TRIAL, ALL BECAUSE OF HIS OWN SELF-SERVING DESIRE TO KEEP A FIRM GRIP ON HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH, COMPLIMENTS OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEM PARTY.


CERTAINLY, THE LAW AND THE RIGHTS OF AN INNOCENT MAN TAKE A BACK SEAT TO LAPDOG COLLIER'S OBLIGATION TO CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN TO CONVICT EVERY DEFENDANT, INNOCENT AND OTHERWISE, THAT COMES BEFORE HIM SO AS TO PRESERVE HOLMAN'S TARNISHED 98% RATE OF CONVICTION.


MUCH MORE TO COME .....

WHAT ELSE HAS BEEN UNLAWFULLY REMOVED FROM THE CORRUPTED TRIAL TRANCRIPT?

I am glad you asked that question!  The blogger can point out just a few of the less than judicious comments made at trial by THE COMMON CRIMINALS OVER AT COURTHOUSE NO. 1 AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO COMPLETELY CORRUPT LAPDOG JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, TOWN WHORE, AND THE "PAVLOV DOG" OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.


HERE ARE A FEW OF LAPDOG COLLIER'S REMARKS, UNLAWFULLY EXCISED FROM THE CORRUPTED TRIAL TRANSCRIPT:


LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, TOWN WHORE, AND CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG," conduct a four-part suppression  hearing, over the span of several weeks, due in large measure to the incompetence and arrogance of SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.


As a matter of law, the State bears the burden of proof in any suppression hearing where the seizure of the evidence was effected without a search warrant.  In the case being profiled at this blog, Keystone sheriff's deputies seized evidence from this defendant, without a search warrant, incident to his unlawful arrest.  Therefore, again according to the law, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR was compelled to first put on witnesses and evidence to support the State's contention that the evidence was legally seized from this Defendant, WHICH IT WAS NOT.


At the suppression hearing, the first session of which was conducted on August 21, 2009 SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR appeared, completely unprepared, and had no witnesses available to testify and bear his burden of proof!


LAPDOG COLLIER, who routinely fails to abide by the law and the rules of evidence, ordered the Defense to put on its case, which Defense Counsel was prepared to do.


At what turned out to be the conclusion of the first session of the suppression hearing, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, was completely out of control, arguing with Defense Counsel.


LAPDOG COLLIER WAS UNABLE TO RESTRAIN SALISBURY OR RESTORE ANY SEMBLANCE OF ORDER IN THE COURTROOM. (WHILE THIS WAS GOING ON, ASSISTANT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR MUSTAFAH RAZAVI WAS SMILING BROADLY, WAVING, AND GIVING LAPDOG COLLIER THE THUMBS-UP!)


Finally, as LAPDOG COLLIER could no longer tolerate Defense Counsel besting his "boy" SALISBURY with her knowledge of law and her argument, LAPDOG COLLIER growled "We're done for the day."


LAPDOG COLLIER then turned to the Defense Investigator, who had been testifying and who had also bested SALISBURY, and grunted to the Defense Investigator, who was then sitting in the witness stand, "GET OUT OF HERE!"


Curiously, this little bit of dialogue from LAPDOG COLLIER has been excised from the trial transcript.  Certainly this Defendant had no part in withholding this remark from LAPDOG COLLIER.


It would certainly seem that the only individual who benefited from excising this less than judicious remark from the transcript is LAPDOG COLLIER, who did not want the 9th District Court of Appeals to notice the fact that LAPDOG COLLIER acted like a HORSE'S ASS FROM THE BENCH.


As a matter of fact, this comment from LAPDOG COLLIER constituted a violation of the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct.  Specifically, as expressly provided by the Code of Judicial Conduct:

RULE 2.8 Decorum, Demeanor, and Communication with Jurors

         (A) A judge shall require order and decorum in proceedings before the court.

(B) A judge shall be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, court staff, court officials, and others with whom the judge deals in an official capacity, and shall require similar conduct of lawyers, court staff, court officials, and others subject to the judge’s direction and control.

LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, DID NOT WANT THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS TO RECOGNIZE THE HE WAS MOST CERTAINLY NOT PATIENT, DIGNIFIED, OR COURTEOUS.  THOSE CHARACTERISTICS JUST DON'T EVER SEEM TO BE EXEMPLIFIED IN ANY WAY BY LAPDOG COLLIER'S DEMEANOR AND PERFORMANCE IN THE COURTROOM.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

JUST WHAT DID THE COMMON CRIMINALS OPERATING COURTROOM NO.1 AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION DELETE FROM THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT?

In the prior post at this blog. readers were treated to the basis upon which the COMMON CRIMINALS OVER AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION WERE INSPIRED TO TAMPER WITH AND ALTER THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT FOR THE UNLAWFUL PURPOSE OF DEPRIVING THIS DEFENDANT A FAIR HEARING ON HIS APPEAL.


SPECIFICALLY, THE HOLDING OF THE UNTIED STATES SUPREME COURT IN DAVIS v ALASKA (1974) COMPEL AUTOMATIC REVERSAL OF THIS DEFENDANT'S UNLAWFUL CONVICTION BEFORE LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, WHO DELIBERATELY AND UNLAWFULLY PREVENTED DEFENSE COUNSEL FROM PROPERLY CROSS-EXAMINING THE STATE'S WITNESSES.


Upon the unassailable discovery that the COMMON CRIMINALS OVER IN COURTROOM NO. 1 AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION HAD TAMPERED WITH AND ALTERED THE "OFFICIAL" TRIAL TRANSCRIPT, DEFENSE COUNSEL FILED A BRIEF WITH THE HONORABLE ROBERT J. BROWN, WHO WAS APPOINTED BY THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT TO REPLACE CORRUPT LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE COLLIER TO HEAR AND DECIDE THIS DEFENDANT'S PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF.


JUDGE BROWN, WHO APPEARS TO BE AN HONEST AND HONORABLE MAN, IS A BREATH OF FRESH AIR IN THE CORRUPT ENVIRONMENT OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTROOM NO. 1, LAPDOG COLLIER'S ASSIGNED COURTROOM.  


It was truly refreshing to observe that Judge Brown maintains proper order and decorum in proceedings before him, unlike LAPDOG COLLIER whose proceedings more closely resemble a circus sideshow.


In the prior post at this blog, readers were pointed to Defense Counsel's brief AUTHORITIES AND EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ACQUITTAL; MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL; MOTION FOR ARREST OF JUDGMENT; MOTION TO SUSPEND EXECUTION OF SENTENCE; AND MOTION FOR BAIL PENDING APPEAL , which can be found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=77.

In that brief Defense Counsel drew to LAPDOG COLLIER'S attention to the holdings of the United States Supreme Court in Davis v Alaska, virtually assuring LAPDOG COLLIER that he would be overturned and reversed by the 9th District Court of Appeals because he had deliberately deprived this Defendant of his right to effective cross-examination of the State's witnesses, thus intentionally denying this Defendant his rights accorded by the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.  

The United State Supreme Court, in Davis v Alaska, has held that denying a defendant of the right to effective cross-examination, as LAPDOG COLLIER so deprived this Defendant at trial, is a "CONSTITUTIONAL ERROR OF THE FIRST MAGNITUDE" REQUIRING AUTOMATIC REVERSAL!


For those who have an interest in reading the complete text of Davis v Alaska, that case can be found at http://supreme.justia.com/us/415/308/case.html  .


Defense counsel filed her brief PETITIONER'S MOTION TO CORRECT TRANSCRIPTS on August 4, 2011.


On August 29, 2011, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR filed RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO CORRECT TRANSCRIPTS AND MOTION TO HAVE DEFENSE COUNSEL RECUSED FROM CASE.  The brief filed by HOLMAN'S OFFICE is not displayed for public viewing at the website of the Medina County Clerk of Court, for reasons that are all too obvious to readers of this blog.


CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN DOES NOT WANT THE PUBLIC TO KNOW THAT HE OPPOSES CORRECTING THE CORRUPTED TRIAL TRANSCRIPT.  HOLMAN DOES NOT WISH THE PUBLIC TO KNOW THAT HE CONTINUES TO OBSTRUCT THE PROPER ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE!


In reply to HOLMAN'S OPPOSITION TO CORRECT THE CORRUPTED AND TAINTED "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT, Defense Counsel filed a subsequent brief.  Defense counsel filed her brief PETITIONER'S REPLY TO STATE'S OPPOSITION TO CORRECT THE RECORD; OPPOSITION TO STATE'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PETITIONER'S COUNSEL found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=129


At Pages 19 - 26 of Defense Counsel's Reply to State's Opposition to Correct The Record, Defense Counsel has pointed out some, but not all, of the testimony unlawfully removed from the trial transcript by the COMMON CRIMINALS OVER AT COURTROOM NO. 1 IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION.


PERTINENT PORTIONS OF THE BRIEF, IDENTIFYING SPECIFICALLY THE TESTIMONY THAT HAS BEEN DELIBERATELY AND UNLAWFULLY REMOVED FROM THE CORRUPTED TRIAL TRANSCRIPT BY THE COMMON CRIMINALS OPERATING IN COURTROOM NO. 1 ARE EXCERPTED HERE:

In the Additional Authorities brief, Trial Counsel pled:

           For example, the defendant was prejudiced when defense counsel was not permitted to fully cross-examine Deputy Frank Telatko regarding the exculpatory statements of Matthew Hartman, made immediately after his arrest.  The Court also prevented defense counsel from cross-examining Telatko concerning his lack of knowledge of the law for making an arrest without a warrant, and his failure to accurately include in his report his observations, which were exculpatory to Matt and contradictory to Kim Leighton’s 911 call, thus revealing her call was a false alarm.  Full cross-exam would have impeached not only Telatko’s credibility, but also the credibility of Kim Leighton.

            Curiously, the transcript fails to include the line of questioning from Defense Counsel concerning Telatko’s knowledge, or lack thereof, “of the law for making an arrest without a warrant, and his failure to accurately include in his report his observations, which were exculpatory to Matt and contradictory to Kim Leighton’s 911 call, thus revealing her call was a false alarm.”  Further, the transcript mysteriously fails to reflect that the trial judge prevented Defense Counsel from pursuing that line of questioning.  The State can offer no plausible innocent  explanation for this omission from the transcript, which omission certainly does not benefit Petitioner.

            In her Additional Authorities brief, Defense Counsel pled:

             

              The Court prevented defense counsel from cross-examining Al Leighton regarding the statements he made to sheriff’s deputies at his home, the scene of the alleged offense on May 27, 2009.  Specifically, Mr. Leighton informed sheriff’s deputies that Matthew had not burglarized his home and that he did not wish to pursue criminal charges against Matthew.  The defense was also stifled from eliciting additional exculpatory testimony from Mr. Leighton regarding information he provided to Deputies Clinage and Telatko on May 29, 2009, when they conducted an additional interview of him at his home.  Despite numerous written and oral requests by the defense for the tape recording of that interview, the assistant prosecutor refused to provide it.  Not only did the defense not have the tape recording prior to its cross-examination of Mr. Leighton, it still has not been turned over to the defense.

              The Court also prevented defense counsel from cross-examining Mr. Leighton as to his known prior traumatic brain injury and the manner in which such injury may have affected his sensory abilities to perceive and process events and information.  Such cross-examination was relevant for the jury to assess Mr. Leighton’s ability and inability to remember events and conversations accurately.

            The trial transcript fails to contain Defense Counsel’s line of questioning regarding statements made by Mr. Leighton to sheriff’s deputies on May 27, 2009 that the Petitioner had not burglarized his home. Further, the transcript mysteriously fails to reflect that the trial judge prevented Defense Counsel from pursuing that line of questioning.  The State can offer no plausible innocent explanation for this omission from the trial transcript, which omission certainly does not benefit Petitioner.

            The trial transcript fails to include Defense Counsel’s line of questioning with regard to statements made by Mr. Leighton to sheriff’s deputies during a subsequent interview of him on May 29, 2009.  Further, the transcript mysteriously fails to reflect that the trial judge prevented Defense Counsel from pursuing that line of questioning.  The State can offer no plausible innocent explanation for this omission from the trial transcript, which omissions certainly does not provide any benefit to Petitioner.

            The transcript fails to include Defense Counsel’s line of questioning regarding Mr. Leighton’s known traumatic brain injury.  Further, the transcript mysteriously fails to reflect that the trial judge prevented Defense Counsel from pursuing that line of questioning.  The State can offer no plausible innocent explanation for this omission from the trial transcript, which omission certainly does not benefit Petitioner.

            A particularly noteworthy and compelling  purported “anomaly” appears in the transcript at the purported close of the cross-examination of Al Leighton. (Tr. 265)  As the State well knows, Defense Counsel, as an experienced Federal prosecutor, subscribed to appropriate protocol by informing the trial judge that she had no further questions at the conclusion of her examinations and cross-examinations of the respective witnesses.  (Tr. Suppression Hearing 64, 119, 217, 288; Tr. 171, 210, 333,  338, 416, 467, 546, 591, 649, 669, 815, 890)  The transcript at the purported conclusion of the testimony of Al Leighton ends abruptly during an incomplete line of questioning by Defense Counsel, and lacks her usual and customary notice to the trial judge, “I have no further questions.”

            Further, in her Additional Authorities brief, Defense Counsel pled thusly:

            Additionally, defense counsel intended to cross-examine Mrs. Leighton as to the basis of her animus toward Matthew, which long predated May 27, 2009, and which colored and motivated both her inflammatory and prejudicial remarks made to the 911 dispatcher and her subsequent, perjured testimony at trial.

            The transcript fails to include Defense Counsel’s line of questioning as to Mrs. Leighton’s animus toward petitioner.  Further, the transcript mysteriously fails to reflect that the trial judge prevented Defense Counsel from pursuing that line of questioning.  The State can offer no plausible innocent explanation for this omission from the trial transcript, which omission certainly does not benefit Petitioner.

THESE ARE SOME, BUT NOT ALL, OF SPECIFIC ELEMENTS OF THE TESTIMONY OF THE STATE'S WITNESSES THAT HAVE BEEN UNLAWFULLY REMOVED FROM THE CORRUPTED TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS BY THE CRIMINALS OPERATING IN COURTROOM NO. 1 AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION!

MUCH, MUCH MORE TO COME ....