NEWBY KERN TRIES TO HIDE SALISBURY'S LONGSTANDING, EXTENSIVE HISTORY OF PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, ALL OF WHICH HAS BEEN FACILITATED BY LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER

In the prior post at this blog, readers learned that CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN has added a rookie attorney to his staff, Newby attorney Matthew Kern.  HOLMAN THE CORRUPT has assigned Newby Kern to oppose the Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, motivated in no small measure to conceal the unlawful and unethical conduct of his office and LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.


Toward the end of attempting to conceal the illegal conduct of LAPDOG COLLIER and MEDINA ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, Newby Kern filed a brief in opposition to this innocent Defendant's Motion for Bond.  Further, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT HAS INSTRUCTED THE MEDINA COUNTY CLERK OF COURT TO WITHHOLD THIS INNOCENT DEFENDANT'S REPLY BRIEF SO AS TO WITHHOLD FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND SCRUTINY THE EVIDENCE THAT SUPPORTS THE ILLEGAL AND UNETHICAL CONDUCT OF HIS OFFICE.

In his Brief in Opposition to Bond, rife with misrepresentation of material facts and unsupported claims (much as if SALISBURY THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR had significant input, even though SALISBURY in incapable of composing an intelligible legal brief), Newby Kern moved to strike from the record evidence of the longstanding extensive patter of prosecutorial misconduct by Salisbury, all of which misconduct was deliberately facilitated and enabled by LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER,
HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG."


FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF CASES PRESENTED TO THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS IN WHICH SALISBURY'S MISCONDUCT WAS RAISED AS AN ISSUE:

State v Aaron Gatt, 2011-Ohio-5221, tried by Salisbury before Collier

  
-  "This Court has previously addressed this prosecutor’s tendency to engage in “widespread improper conduct” in the courtroom." 


State v Brian Johnson, 2011-Ohio-3623, tried by Salisbury before Collier 

 -  " The prosecutor in this case did engage in a pattern of improper conduct. "
  -  " The prosecutor was argumentative, asked improper questions, made testimonial assertions, referred to facts that were not in the record, misrepresented the evidence, and expressed his personal opinion of Mr. Johnson’s credibility."
  -  “While an attorney’s [SALISBURY'S] lack of familiarity with the Rules of Evidence may affect the question of whether misconduct was intentional or inadvertent, ignorance of the Rules of Evidence does not render questioning allowable where it would otherwise be improper.” 
  -  "The prosecutor’s “cross-examination” of these women was improper, and the trial court  [LAPDOG COLLIER] should not have allowed him to get away with it."

State v Riffle, 2010-Ohio-2812, tried by Salisbury before Collier

  -  "In his first assignment of error, Riffle contends that he was denied a fair trial due to prosecutorial misconduct."

State v Craig Maynard, 2009-Ohio-282, tried by Salisbury before Collier

 -  "

Mr. Maynard’s second assignment of error is that the trial court incorrectly prevented him from questioning witnesses about Mrs. B.’s and B.M.’s veracity." 

State v Peter Riffle, 2008-Ohio-4155, tried by Salisbury before Collier

-  "In his first assignment of error, Riffle asserts that his constitutional rights were violated: (1) when Police Chief Sivard testified that once given his Miranda warnings, Riffle exercised his right to remain silent; (2) when a social worker testified as to the circumstances of her interview with Riffle and noted that Riffle had told police that he wanted an attorney; and (3) when the State [SALISBURY] referenced Riffle’s decision to cease interrogation with police during closing argument."

  -  "We, therefore, hold that the evidence of, and the State’s [SALISBURY'S] references to, Riffle’s silence were improper.

State v Robert Morris, 2008-Ohio-3209, tried by Salisbury before Collier

  -  “The trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of criminal trespassing and in failing to properly instruct on a necessary element of criminal trespass as required for a conviction of burglary in violation of [Defendant’s] rights to due process and fair trial under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Ohio and United States Constitutions.”

  -  " Defendant maintains that the trial court agreed that criminal trespass was a lesser included offense of burglary, but refused to instruct the jury on the offense based on State v. Fontes (2000), 87 Ohio St.3d 527."

  -  "Defendant maintains that the trial court simply got confused between the charged crime (the (A)(3) burglary) and the State’s suggested lesser included, the (A)(4) burglary, when it made its decision on how to instruct the jury."   [LAPDOG COLLIER WAS NOT "CONFUSED," BUT ACTED DELIBERATELY TO RAILROAD MR. MORRIS]

 -  “If under any reasonable view of the evidence it is possible for the trier of fact to

find the defendant not guilty of the greater offense and guilty of the lesser offense, the instruction on the lesser included offense must be given. The evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to defendant.” 

State v Anthony Divincenzo, 2006-Ohio-6330, tried by Salisbury before Collier

  - " In his fifth assignment of error, Appellant argues that the trial court [LAPDOG COLLIER] erred in permitting the State [SALISBURY] to introduce testimony that Appellant invoked his right to counsel during his interview with police."

State v Ricardo Almazan, 2006-Ohio-5047, tried by Salisbury before Collier

  -  “The trial court abused its discretion and erred to the prejudice of [Defendant] by allowing the state to introduce, over defense objection, irrelevant, unfairly prejudicial and misleading testimony by a sheriff’s deputy...."

State v Michael Scheck, 2006-Ohio-647, tried by Salisbury before Collier

  -  "In his first assignment of error, Appellant argues that the trial court [LAPDOG COLLIER] committed reversible error when it prohibited the defense from cross-examining

  -  "In his second assignment of error, Appellant contends that the State [SALISBURY] committed prosecutorial misconduct when it authorized the destruction of crucial evidence prior to trial."

State v Henry Smith, 2005-Ohio-1001, tried by Salisbury before Collier

  -  "In his fourth assignment of error, Appellant has argued that he was

 not afforded a fair trial due to prosecutorial misconduct."  

  -  "Appellant next has argued that certain comments by the State in closing argument were racially motivated."   [ See SALISBURY'S racist remarks at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/03/salisbury-continues-to-lie-claims-he.html and also at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/03/salisbury-although-slow-learner-is.html ]


READERS HAVE BEEN SHOWN ONLY 10 OF THE MOST RECENT 20 CASES PRESENTED TO THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS RAISING THE PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.  THERE ARE CERTAINLY MANY, MANY MORE.


NOW, TO THE POINT OF THIS DEMONSTRATION OF THE PATTERN OF EGREGIOUS MISCONDUCT BY MEDINA ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR:


Newby Kern, in his Opposition to Bond, objects to the presently assigned judge having been presented with the full list of the 20 most recent cases raising the issues of SALISBURY'S PATTERN OF EGREGIOUS MISCONDUCT, claiming that SALISBURY'S PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT IN THE PRIOR MOST RECENT 20 CASES IS "IRRELEVANT" TO SALISBURY'S PATTERN OF EGREGIOUS PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT  IN THE CASE OF THE INNOCENT CITIZEN BEING PROFILED AT THIS BLOG.


Specifically, Newby Kern has argued:

It is the position of the State that this [list of cases documenting SALISBURY'S misconduct] is entirely irrelevant to the proceedings as the Opinions of the Ninth District Court of Appeals whether a prosecutor erred in other cases is irrelevant to the determination whether a prosecutor erred (in this case)....Frankly, whether the prosecutor committed misconduct in some other case is irrelevant to whether there was misconduct in this case.

Setting aside the fact that Newby Kern appears to have a problem constructing a proper sentence, his argument is based upon the faulty premise that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, SIMPLY "ERRED" WHEN HE ENGAGED IN AN EGREGIOUS PATTERN OF PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT WHEN HE JOINED TOGETHER WITH LAPDOG COLLIER TO RAILROAD AN INNOCENT CITIZEN INTO PRISON.

To believe that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, simply "erred" can only be concluded by an individual of significantly diminished mental capacity to the level of LAPDOG COLLIER. 


The purpose of the list of 20 recent cases of prosecutorial misconduct by SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR is to demonstrate unequivocally that SALISBURY ENGAGED IN A DELIBERATE PATTERN OF EGREGIOUS PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, AS HE HAD DONE SO MAY TIMES BEFORE OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS.


THAT PATTERN OF EGREGIOUS PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT BY SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, HAS GONE UNCHECKED FOR MANY YEARS, PROVING THAT SUCH MISCONDUCT IS CONDONED AND PROMOTED BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.


MUCH MORE TO COME ON THIS SUBJECT ....

 

  

 

 

    

 

MEDINA COUNTY LIARS CLUB TO MEET IN LAPDOG COLLIER'S KANGAROO COURTROOM NO. 1

The Medina County LIARS CLUB will hold it's daily meeting in LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER'S KANGAROO COURTROOM NO.1 at 10:00 a.m. today for the express purpose of inducting the newest member, newby attorney Mathew Kern, into the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Chapter of the MEDINA COUNTY LIARS CLUB.

Kern is just a pup, out of law school for little more than a year.  However, he has taken to the official mantra of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN like a duck to water.

Regular readers of this blog will recall the mantra of HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, "LIE A LITTLE, LIE A LOT.  WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?"  


Kern certainly has already developed the habit, so near and dear to the heart of HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, of taking great liberties with the facts and the truth.


HOLMAN THE CORRUPT has assigned newby attorney Kern with opposing the Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, filed by the innocent citizen who LAPDOG COLLIER and MEDINA ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY railroaded into prison, and thereafter TAMPERED WITH, MATERIALLY ALTERED, AND CHANGED THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT PF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE BEING PROFILED AT THIS BLOG/


In the most recent development in the matter of the Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, this innocent Defendant filed a motion for bond, pending a decision in his direct appeal, or, in the alternative, a finding and resolution of his Petition.


Of course, fearing a judicial finding condemning his office for corrupt and unlawful conduct, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT instructed Newby Kern to file a brief opposing bond.

Here, of course, is where Newby Kern shows his true colors, and demonstrates, despite his tender age,  that he is just one more run-of-the mill sleazy attorney.

The blogger will set out, at this point, some of Newby Kern's false claims, as set out in his opposition to bond for this innocent citizen:

"(Defense Counsel)has claimed that the State engages in certain practices or has performed certain acts which never occurred.  Out of thin air she has constructed an entire web of lies about which there is no evidence to support the fantastic claims.  She has claimed, inter alia, that the State colluded with the court reporter, that the State placed an informant in the Medina County Jail, that the State withheld exculpatory evidence, and that the State has destroyed that supposed evidence to prevent the defense from proving the supposed Brady violation.  These claims are utterly false."


FIRST OF ALL, ANYTIME THAT HOLMAN THE CORRUPT AND ANY OF HIS STAFF, INCLUDING NEWBY KERN, USE THE WORD "LIE" IN ANY CONTEXT, ONE CAN BE ASSURED THAT THEY, THEMSELVES, ARE THE ONE LYING.


Of course, as with all such slime that comes oozing from the office of HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, Newby Kern has asserted all of the above false claims without the slightest bit of proof or evidence. 


Defense Counsel, for obvious reasons, filed a brief in reply, so as to establish the true facts of the matter.


HOLMAN THE CORRUPT has once again exercised his exclusive option to CENSOR the Defendant's Reply Brief by instructing the Clerk of Court to withhold the brief from the general public, once again violating the Constitutional mandate requiring fair and public trials.


A snippet of attachments to the Reply Brief, specifically only 6 of 21 Exhibits,  and nothing the Reply Brief is to be found at the Clerk's "public" website, specifically found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=143

OBVIOUSLY, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT IS ATTEMPTING TO CONCEAL THE TRUE FACTS REGARDING THE UNLAWFUL CONDUCT AND MISCONDUCT OF HIS OFFICE.


SO AS TO FULLY INFORM YOU, THE READER, OF THE TRUE FACTS, ALL SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE, THE BLOGGER WILL REVEAL PORTION OF THE REPLY BRIEF THAT HOLMAN IS ATTEMPTING TO HIDE FROM PUBLIC VIEW.


MUCH MORE TO COME...

MEDINA LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER OVERTURNED AGAIN BY THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ON ANOTHER RUBBER-STAMPED CONVICTION

MEDINA LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, proves once again why he has earned the title of VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.

On February 21, 2012, the Ninth District Court of Appeals overturned and reversed LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER in the case of State of Ohio v Tiffany Schaufele, 2012-Ohio-642, found at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2012/2012-ohio-642.pdf , a case prosecuted by none other than MEDINA ASS PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.


By now it is obvious that the office of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN does not screen any of the cases presented for prosecution by local law enforcement authorities, but relies upon the corrupt practices of his office and the COLLUSION WITH LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER TO "WIN" CONVICTIONS IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT THERE IS NO COMPETENT, CREDIBLE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE CHARGES.  


HOLMAN THE CORRUPT is clearly negligent by failing to evaluate those cases presented by local officers for actual violations of law.  It is obvious that if an officer believes there is a violation of law, even if lacking probable cause, that's good enough for HOLMAN THE CORRUPT.  Perhaps it is simply a matter of ignorance of the law by HOLMAN THE CORRUPT and his criminal assistants (an apt characterization).  


In the case of Ms. Schaufele, who agreed to a BENCH TRIAL before LAPDOG  JUDGE COLLIER, Ms. Schaufele's attorney committed a singular error in judgement by placing any faith at all in the integrity of LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER and the Medina County Courts.  The defense attorney, from Strongsville, apparently was not aware that LAPDOG COLLIER RUNS A KANGAROO COURT AND DOES NOTHING MORE THAN RUBBER-STAMP ANYTHING THAT COMES OUT OF THE OFFICE OF HOLMAN THE CORRUPT.


In the Schaufele case, LAPDOG COLLIER found Ms. Schaufele GUILTY in spite of the fact there was insufficient evidence of guilt, according to the Ninth District Court of Appeals.


That, of course, comes as no surprise to the blogger, since it is now commonly known that the only way LAPDOG COLLIER can preserve his lifetime political appointment to the Medina County Bench is to blindly serve CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN who will not run a candidate against LAPDOG COLLIER as long as LAPDOG does precisely as instructed.


Apparently, LAPDOG COLLIER and SALISBURY THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR did not sufficiently edit and materially alter the transcript of this bench trial to overcome the usual and customary INCOMPETENCE OF LAPDOG COLLIER or THE PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT OF SALISBURY THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR to the extent that they were able to convince the Ninth District Court of Appeals that Ms. Schaufele received a fair trial.


Congratulations to Ms. Schaufele for obtaining justice, which clearly cannot be found in the courts of Medina County.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

MAKING THE CONNECTION FROM CUYAHOGA COUNTY CORRUPTION AND MEDINA COUNTY

In the prior segment to this blog, readers were shown the connections in the Cuyahoga County Corruption investigation between former Cuyahoga County Auditor Frank Russo, former Cuyahoga County Commissioner Jimmy Dimora, and Dimora's neighbor, drug runner, bomber, murderer (according to the late Angelo Lonardo) and reputed "Don" of the Cleveland Family of La Cosa Nostra, Russell J. Papalardo.


Having established those connections, one certain connection between Cuyahoga County corruption and Medina County corruption can be made in the person of former Brunswick Service Director SAM SCAFFIDE.


Regular readers of this blog may recall a prior post that, according to a well-placed source, SCAFFIDE had been terminated from his employment as Service Director by the Brunswick City Manager James Lukas in May 2011.

When approached by the media about SCAFFIDE'S firing, the Brunswick City Manager refused comment.  An online Cleveland Plain Dealer article about SCAFFIDE'S removal form his position as the Brunswick Service Director can be found at http://blog.cleveland.com/brunswicksuntimes/2011/05/scaffide_leaving_brunwick_serv.html .

The well-placed source reported that SCAFFIDE had been fired for MISAPPROPRIATION. 


Further, the source reported that SCAFFIDE got the job based upon the intervention of Cuyahoga County Commissioner Jimmy Dimora.


OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE IN THIS ENTIRE MATTER IS THE FACT THAT CORRUPT MEDINA DEMOCRAT PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN HAS NOT UNDERTAKEN ANY PROSECUTIVE ACTION AGAINST SCAFFIDE, A DEMOCRAT COUNCILMAN IN TWINSBURG, OHIO, IF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE SOURCE IS ACCURATE.


Readers can easily review the prior post, captioned THE FIX IS IN! DINO HOLMAN WON'T PROSECUTE POLITICALLY CONNECTED FELLOW DEM PUBLIC OFFICIAL! easily found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/07/fix-is-in-dino-holman-wont-prosecute.html

Readers who have been following testimony in the Dimora trial will be aware that corrupt former Cuyahoga County Frank Russo, just this past week, offered testimony against his old pal Jimmy Dimora at DiMora's trial in U.S. District Court, Akron.

One particular interesting bit of Russo's testimony was his testimony that he and Jimmy Dimora did, indeed, approach judges in attempts to fix cases.  Convicted judge Bridget McCafferty was one of them.


Following are excerpts from an online article of the Newsnet 5 (TV channel 5) website.  The article can be found at http://www.newsnet5.com/dpp/news/political/corruption_probe/frank-russo-names-judges-he-and-jimmy-dimora-allegedly-contacted-for-help-on-court-cases :

  -  "Frank Russo testified he and Jimmy Dimora called judges to "fix cases," and some names were mentioned in the trial for the first time. Russo also testified Dimora asked him to call judges on his behalf "at least five times."

  -  "One named of the first time was Judge Cheryl Karner. She is a domestic relations judge at the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas."

  -  "Another judge Russo said he and Dimora called for help was Judge Joseph F. Russo, a juvenile court judge at the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas." 
  -  "Frank Russo also named former judge Bridgette McCafferty , who already is in prison."

  -  "Russo also named Cleveland Municipal Court judges Joe Zone and Emanuella Groves, both of whom had not been mentioned before."


  -  "Russo said retired domestic relations Judge James Celebrezze also was contacted...."

  -  "Many judges over the years were called," Russo said in federal court late Wednesday afternoon."
  -  " Russo also named some bailiffs he and Dimora contacted, trying to reach judges."

Additional online articles about the corruption of the courts by DIMORA and RUSSO can be found at http://www.cleveland.com/countyincrisis/index.ssf/2012/02/jimmy_dimora_called_five_judge.html  and at http://www.cleveland.com/countyincrisis/index.ssf/2012/02/jimmy_dimora_trial_what_we_now.html

The evidence against Jimmy Dimora consists in no small part of hours of telephone conversations between Dimora and others, secretly recorded by the FBI pursuant to court ordered Title III wiretaps.

Turning back once again to former  Brunswick Service Director Sam Scaffide, most of the general public is unaware that SAM SCAFFIDE IS JIMMY DIMORA'S COUSIN !

The matter of the failure  of CORRUPT MEDINA DEMOCRAT PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN to initiate a prosecution of Democrat SAM SCAFFIDE, Democrat JIMMY DIMORA'S COUSIN, takes on a new dimension.

IS IT POSSIBLE THAT JIMMY DIMORA PLACED A TELEPHONE CALL TO HOLMAN THE CORRUPT TO WARD OFF A CRIMINAL PROSECUTION OF SAM SCAFFIDE, HIS COUSIN?  

OR IS IT POSSIBLE THAT JIMMY DIMORA PLACED A CALL TO CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER TO THAT SAME END?  AFTER ALL, LAPDOG COLLIER IS AN ITALIAN, HAVING BEEN BORN CHRISTOPHER CALAFATO.   THOSE OLD ETHNIC ITALIAN ROOTS CAN RUN REALLY DEEP.

The recent testimony in Dimora's trial demonstrates that Dimora and Russo have a history of intervening in legal matters in the courts.

WAS SUCH A PHONE CALL EVER MADE?  ONLY DIMORA, SCAFFIDE, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, AND LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER KNOW FOR SURE!

DOES THE FBI HAVE A RECORDING OF SUCH A TELEPHONE CALL?  ONLY THE FBI KNOWS FOR SURE AT THIS POINT.

IF, HOWEVER, SUCH A PHONE CALL HAD BEEN MADE, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT AND/OR LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER HAVE GOT TO BE CRINGING AT THE PROSPECT THAT THEY MAY HAVE BEEN RECORDED!

TIME WILL TELL!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

AN EXPLOSIVE ORGANIZED CRIME CONNECTION TO MEDINA COUNTY

Regular readers of this blog may recall a prior post at this blog exploring the potential influence of Organized Crime figures upon decisions and events, or lack thereof, in the CORRUPT COURTS OF MEDINA COUNTY, OHIO.  That prior post, captioned JUST THINKING THROUGH THIS POSSIBLE ORGANIZED CRIME CONNECTION BETWEEN MEDINA AND CLEVELAND, easily found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/11/just-thinking-this-possible-organized.html .


In that prior post, the blogger noted that former Cuyahoga County Commissioner Jimmy DiMora, currently on trial in U.S. District Court in Akron on numerous charges arising from public corruption in Cuyahoga County (including RICO charges - Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization), lives directly across the street from Russell J. Papalardo, the reputed head (Don) of the Cleveland Organized Crime Family.  Papalardo, who currently works as a licensed real estate agent for Carriage Hill Realty, a firm owned and operated by his brother Fred Papalardo.


Anyone who has been following the Cuyahoga County Corruption investigation and the current trial of Jimmy DiMora has learned that former Cuyahoga County Auditor Frank Russo and DiMora were closely aligned in the corruption that pervaded Cuyahoga County Government.  In fact, Frank Russo, who has already pled guilty to his crimes and been sentenced to a term of 21 years in the United States Penitentiary, has offered compelling testimony this past week, strongly implicating DiMora in matters of public corruption.


Interestingly enough, Russell Papalardo's brother, Fred, in addition to his ownership and operation of Carriage Hill Realty, was employed by Frank Russo in the Cuyahoga County Auditor's Office.


Certain of the above facts can be checked and verified at http://www.cleveland.com/countyincrisis/index.ssf/2008/12/dimoras_neighborhood_attracts.html


IT IS CLEAR, FROM THE CONNECTIONS DRAWN ABOVE, THAT, AT THE VERY LEAST, RUSSELL PAPALARDO, REPUTED DON OF THE CLEVELAND FAMILY OF LA COSA NOSTRA ("OUR THING") IS IN THE PROVERBIAL "LOOP" ALONG WITH RUSSO AND DiMORA.


Russell J. Papalardo was convicted in 1986 in U.S. District Court, Cleveland, for his involvement in an elaborate and profitable cocaine ring, along with others with ties to the Cleveland mob.  Papalardo served a sentence of four years in the Federal Penitentiary.


A little research has developed some rather interesting and "explosive" historical information about Russell Papalardo.


Readers of this blog who are old enough may recall the mob war raging in Cleveland in the 1970's between Irish and Italian old-time gangsters.  In fact, the recent film Kill the Irishman took a stab at portraying the conflicts between Danny Green, John Nardi (allied with Greene), Keith Ritson and members of the more orthodox Italian mob, headed at the time by John Scalish and succeeded by Jack Licavoli a/k/a Jack White. While the film may be entertaining, it has taken significant license with the facts as the blogger, who had a law enforcement interest in and contact with some of those criminals at the time, recalls them to be.


More to the point, Organized Crime Figure John Nardi, an associate of Danny Greene was killed on May 17, 1977 by a Trojan Horse bomb.  This is to say, Nardi's car was parked in the parking lot of the former Teamsters Headquarters, at the time located on East 18th Street, between Carnegie and Prospect. The Italian mob placed another auto, laden with explosives, beside Nardi's car.  The bomb was remotely detonated when Nardi exited the Teamster Headquarters and entered his own car.


Nardi died on the spot.  No one was ever charged with his murder.


Later in time, Cleveland Underboss Angelo Lonardo ("Big Ange') became the boss of the Cleveland Family of La Cosa Nostra and was convicted in U.S District Court for his involvement in a drug ring.  Lonardo, after having been sentenced to a term of life imprisonment in the United States Penitentiary, decided that it was time to pay ball with the Government.


Reviewing the testimony of Angelo Lonardo before the United States Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations on April 15, 1988, and more specifically Lonardo's supplemental Affidavit to the Committee, one can find the following excerpt:

R. 5/15/77 JOHN NARDI: I understand Nardi was killed
by a bomb placed in an automobile which was parked next to Nardi's by Curly Montana and Poppalardo.. Nardi's death was authorized by Jack White Licavoli who was the boss of our family at the time.

In sworn testimony before the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, by way of Affidavit, Lonardo testified that John "Curly" Montana and Russell J, Papalardo placed the Trojan Horse Bomb in the Teamsters Parking lot, causing the death of John Nardi.


There are several sources available to access Lonardo's testimony and Affidavit.  One of them can be found at http://fubar.com/angelo-lonardo-s-testimony/b339971-1145987


This, of course, is the same Russell J. Papalardo who is "in the loop" of public corruption, along with Frank Russo and Jimmy DiMora.


In the next post, the blogger will detail the now not-so-tenuous connection to the Medina County Courts.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

A PAT ON THE BACK FOR JUDGE DALE CHASE OF THE MEDINA MUNICIPAL COURT

It is time to recognize Judge Dale Chase of the Medina Municipal Court for a case well done.  The following facts have been obtained from the website of the Ohio Ninth District Court of Appeals in the case of State v Kenneth Durbin, 2012-Ohio-301, found online at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2012/2012-ohio-301.pdf .

According to the written Opinion from the Ninth District, the case involves Medina Sheriff's Deputy Douglas CLINAGE, a graduate of the Keystone Cops Advanced Police Training Facility who, in the case being regularly profiled at this blog, failed to appear at trial and give testimony, defying a defense subpoena to appear at trial, all on the express orders of MEDINA ASS PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.


In the Durbin case, the Ninth District Court of Appeals observed that CLINAGE responded to a "fireworks complaint" at the Durbin residence.  Young Kenneth Durbin's father displayed ten "fireworks" to Clinage which Dad Durbin had found in his barn.  CLINAGE confronted the younger Durbin, who admitted that the "fireworks" were his.

The Ninth District failed to note whether or not CLINAGE requested the assistance of the Medina County SWAT team in handling this report of these dangerous explosives.  [See copy of criminal complaint found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/what-you-wont-find-in-medina-county.html .

In any event, CLINAGE photographed the ten dangerous fireworks, seized them, and took them back to the Sheriff's Office for destruction.  (Parking lot fireworks display?)


CLINAGE then left the Sheriff's Office and returned to the Durbin residence, stopping along the way for a Double Whopper (with cheese) and a dozen donuts.

Upon arrival, CLINAGE issued a citation to the younger Durbin for possession of "fireworks," in violation of Section 3743.65(A) of the Ohio Revised Code.

The case proceeded to trial and, after the State rested its case, Judge Chase directed a "Not Guilty" verdict in favor of the younger Durbin.

The State appealed, outraged that it had lost its case for want of competent, credible evidence.

Setting aside all of the legal arguments, it is clear that Judge Chase did what a real judge is supposed to do: JUDGE CHASE PUT THE STATE TO THE TEST AND REQUIRED THAT IT PROVE ITS CASE, AS THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION REQUIRES.


HAD THIS CASE BEEN TRIED BEFORE LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER IN KANGAROO COURTROOM NO. 1, THE RESULT WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY DIFFERENT AND THE YOUNGER DURBIN WOULD BE ON HIS WAY TO THE STATE PENITENTIARY.  


HE WOULD THEN HAVE BEEN DEPRIVED OF A FAIR HEARING ON HIS DIRECT APPEAL AFTER LAPDOG COLLIER, IN COLLUSION WITH MEDINA COUNTY COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY, HAD TAMPERED WITH, MATERIALLY ALTERED, AND CHANGED THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT OF THE PROCEEDINGS.


CONGRATULATIONS TO JUDGE CHASE FOR MAKING A SOUND DECISION.   PERHAPS JUDGE CHASE CAN TAKE LAPDOG COLLIER UNDER HIS WING AND GIVE HIM A LITTLE DIRECTION.  THEN AGAIN, ANY ADVISE FROM JUDGE CHASE WOULD BE TO NO AVAIL, SINCE LAPDOG COLLIER CAN ONLY PRESERVE HIS LIFETIME UNCONTESTED POLITICAL APPOINTMENT  TO THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT BY AND THROUGH BLIND OBEDIENCE TO CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

ERIE COUNTY PROSECUTOR KEVIN BAXTER RETURNS TO MEDINA COUNTY; IN SEARCH OF NEW SEX SLAVE?

CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN  is back at it, once again.
It appears that HOLMAN THE CORRUPT has decided that he should disqualify himself in this matter and has invited his BEST BUD, ERIE COUNTY PROSECUTOR KEVIN BAXTER over to Medina County to prosecute Michael Butts.

A reader of this blog has sent along an impression of events that have given rise to the appointment of KEVIN BAXTER as as "Special Prosecutor" in the Butts case:

Hey, I thought we paid taxes for our own prosecutor, who farms everything out, probably cause there is obvious conflict of interest and he just likes sitting high on the hog get fat off our money!

Some parent stole cash from youth football and probably gave Holman a cut!

"Butts" are BAXTER'S specialty, and BAXTER may very well be on the prowl for a new SEX SLAVE over here in Medina County where, apparently, the selection of victims is acceptable to BAXTER and HOLMAN.


Regular readers of this blog may recall that HOLMAN THE CORRUPT prosecuted Ms. Krista Harris, BAXTER'S SEX SLAVE, after Ms. Harris refused to "play ball" and offer perjured testimony, coerced by BAXTER (a common practice in Medina County), in a pending homicide trial.
[Readers may wish to refresh by reading prior posts, captioned HOLMAN IMPLICATED IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF HIS BEST BUD'S SEX SLAVE! found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/holman-implicated-in-malicious.html AND JUST A SIDE NOTE ON HOLMANS' BEST BUD, ERIE COUNTY PROSECUTOR AND SEX SLAVEMASTER KEVIN BAXTER found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/just-side-note-on-holmans-best-bud-erie.html ]


Interestingly, Summit County Sheriff Drew Alexander found BAXTER to be just one more unethical slug, like HOLMAN THE CORRUPT.  In fact, Sheriff Alexander filed a complaint against BAXTER with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Ohio Supreme Court, citing specifically that, at the time that BAXTER handled a case in Summit County, BAXTER WAS UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR: (1) PERJURY; AND (2) NONCONSENSUAL SEX (RAPE) WITH A WITNESS IN AN UPCOMING MURDER TRIAL, WHO LATER BECAME BAXTER'S SEX SLAVE.


An online article from the Sandusky Register, detailing Summit County Sheriff Alexander's assessment of the character of ERIE COUNTY PROSECUTOR KEVIN BAXTER can be found at http://www.sanduskyregister.com/2010/feb/09/summit-county-sheriff-baxter-botched-it .


Nevertheless, Michael Butts has a hard way to go.  If the charges turn out to be true that Butts stole from a kids' sports league, he has to be a COMPLETE MORON ON PAR WITH LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER.


For one thing, however, one can never be sure that anything that comes through the office of DINO THE CORRUPT is credible, since HOLMAN THE CORRUPT is neither honest nor ethical, lacking the slightest scintilla of integrity.


Whether the charges are true or not, Butts' case is before the DISHONORABLE MEDINA LAPDOG JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER who does everything he's told by HOLMAN THE CORRUPT.  It's the only way that a low-rent attorney like COLLIER can preserve his lifetime uncontested appointment to the Medina County Court, without fear of having to face an opponent in an honest election.


Mr. Butts should realize that his chances of receiving a lawful, fair trial in LAPDOG COLLIER'S KANGAROO COURTROOM NO. 1 are just about as favorable as a snowball surviving the Summer season in Hades!


To top it off, since Mr. Butts' case is in LAPDOG COLLIER'S KANGAROO COURTROOM NO. 1, there is little doubt that HOLMAN THE CORRUPT has assigned the case to "Special Prosecutor" KEVIN BAXTER, who will undoubtedly be scouting the local terrain for his next SEX SLAVE.


BAXTER, working in tandem with LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER ( WHO TAKES HIS MARCHING ORDERS FROM HOLMAN THE CORRUPT), will assure that Butts is convicted, whether he committed a criminal offense or not.


The blogger recently came across this interesting advertisement: 

Cozy Love Nests available in Medina!
Medina is a great location to keep your SEX SLAVE! Medina County is slavery-friendly! No U.S. Constitution and no Rule of Law means that you can keep your SEX SLAVE safely in Medina. If she ever steps out of line, MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DEAN HOLMAN WILL PROSECUTOR HER, JUST LIKE HE DID TO THE SEX SLAVE OF ERIE COUNTY PROSECUTOR KEVIN BAXTER! JUDGE CHRIS COLLIER WILL MAKE SURE SHE'S CONVICTED,TOO! 

The motto of the Good Old Boys at the Medina County Courthouse & Railroad Station : "NO CRIME? NO PROBLEM! GUILTY AS CHARGED!" 

SO CORRUPTION GOES ON AND ON IN THE "COURTS" OF MEDINA COUNTY, WHICH CAN ONLY BE CORRECTED BY AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

MEDINA CORRUPTION HAS SPREAD SOUTH TO FAIRFIELD COUNTY

A reader of this blog has sent along some alarming news: MEDINA CORRUPTION IS SPREADING!


Even more corrupt practices are coming to light, now n Fairfield County, Ohio.  This alarming phenomenon surely has its roots in Medina County, where the are no Constitutional protections and no Rule of Law.

It seems that sheriff's deputies placed  GPS tracking device on the auto of a suspected burglar,  WITHOUT A SEARCH WARRANT - CLEARLY A VIOLATION OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.


As it turns out, the suspect was later tracked to the scene of a residential burglary and later arrested in possession of property stolen during the burglary.  So, while the suspect was ultimately identified and arrested, it was by unlawful means, specifically prohibited by the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.


The Fairfield County judge, much like MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE LAPDOG OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, did not suppress the illegally seized evidence (as he most assuredly should have) and the case proceeded to trial, resulting in the conviction of the suspect.

The Fairfield County Prosecutor Gregg Marx (an obvious descendant of Karl Marx) now argues, "What's the harm?"

THE HARM IS THAT THE FAIRFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES, WHO LIKELY RECEIVED THEIR ADVANCED POLICE TRAINING AT THE KEYSTONE COPS TRAINING ACADEMY (LIKE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES), VIOLATED THE LAW WHILE ENFORCING THE LAW.


By taking this case to trial, the Fairfield County judge and prosecutor ERODE THE PROTECTIONS ACCORDED BY THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, AS HAPPENS DAILY IN THE CORRUPTED COURTS OF MEDINA COUNTY.


An online article detailing this legal debacle in Fairfield County, Ohio can be found at http://www.lancastereaglegazette.com/article/20120208/NEWS01/202080303/GPS-tracking-without-warrant-goes-Ohio-Supreme-Court

A rather interesting comment, among many, is shown below and properly makes the very real and legitimate point:

• Gt Larabee ·  Top commenter · Park University
  

  Drake, getting a warrant is not rocket science. Just follow the court rules and procedures and get your warrant. A search warrant can be had usually on a continuum somewhere between reasonable suspicion to probable cause. You don't have to prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt. It is often times just enough information that a prudent person or an experienced officer would suspect that crime may be afoot. When I went to college and took constitutional law, I was told, if at all possible, always get a search warrant, to assure that your case will have a conviction. In today's modern world of electronic communications, a warrant can be obtained quite quickly, and an officer can guard the scene while one may be obtained. There are of course incidences where you do not need a warrant, such as plain view, but even in these cases I was taught to get a warrant to avoid trouble. You also can search a person for officer safety or use the Terry Frisk or Pat Down for weapons. Let's take the time to do this right, and the Bad Dudes won't be set free, and our constitutional rights will be protected so that we don't have a police state. Someone has to be Policing the Police, or you will have a Police State, and no one branch of government should ever have absolute power. If you are a police officer, and you are going to put a GPS unit on a subject, or you are going to tap a phone, or use an electronic listening device get a search warrant, or face the fact that you may well lose the people's case to the Bad Guys. They will be let go, and it is the fault of the prosecution and/or the Police Officer....blame no one else. It is not the courts fault, they are policing the police for you. The stakes are that the Bad Guys will go free!

  Reply · 2 ·
  

   · 8 February at 21:44
• 
  

  
  

It is obvious to GT Larabee that dispensation with the requirements of the Fourth Amendment will invariably lead to a POLICE STATE - WHICH IS JUST WHAT WE HAVE IN MEDINA COUNTY.  Mr. Larabee's comments, and others, can be found at  http://www.lancastereaglegazette.com/comments/article/20120208/NEWS01/202080303/GPS-tracking-without-warrant-goes-Ohio-Supreme-Court

The irony of this entire matter is shown by the fact that, quite recently, The United States Supreme Court ruled that the placement of a GPS tracking device, without a warrant, IS A VIOLATION OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND IS, THEREFORE, ILLEGAL.


OF COURSE, IN MEDINA COUNTY, THE DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ARE ROUTINELY AND CUSTOMARILY IGNORED BY THE LIKES OF LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER AND CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, STUPID CRIMINALS BOTH.


FURTHER, MR. LARABEE ERRS WHEN HE BELIEVES THAT THE COURTS POLICE THE POLICE.  NOT IN MEDINA COUNTY!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....