LAPDOG COLLIER DOESN'T TAKE CORRECTION FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS

The trial record is replete with unfounded claims by Salisbury, The Pathological Liar, that Defense Counsel “misleads the court,” and “misstates the law,” when, in fact, it was Salisbury, The Pathological Liar, who perpetually misled the court and the jury and misstated the law in the most general terms, since he failed to cite even one case during the entirety of the proceeding. 

Admittedly it was difficult, if not impossible, for Salisbury to mislead LAPDOG COLLIER, who was complicit with Salisbury throughout the proceedings.

As the Defendant more than adequately set forth, it was the Assistant Prosecutor who affirmatively misled the LAPDOG COLLIER by claiming that criminal trespass was not a lesser included offense of aggravated burglary, despite having been reversed and counseled otherwise by the 9^th District Court of Appeals in State v. Morris, 2008-Ohio-3209 (9^th Dist. App. 2008), tried before LAPDOG Judge Collier, Morris, 2008-Ohio-3209, ¶ 14.  LAPDOG Judge Collier also should have remembered that the Appeals Court reversed him in Morris for not charging the jury with the lesser-included offense instruction in an aggravated burglary case.  Yet, in this case , the same Assistant Prosecutor Salisbury, The Pathological Liar, affirmatively misled the same LAPDOG Judge Collier into not giving the lesser-included criminal trespass instruction.

            The level of complete dishonesty of Salisbury, The Pathological Liar, and the corrupt trial judge LAPDOG COLLIER is exemplified in an exchange between Salisbury and the trial judge on the merits of properly instructing the jury on the lesser-included offense of Criminal Trespass.

            SALISBURY:     Judge?

            COURT:              Yes?

SALISBURY:     If I could just address that point, Judge.  My position – and I think there are cases that back this up – that a criminal trespass  -- the criminal trespass would not be appropriate.

(BRIEF INTERRUPTION IN THE PROCEEDINGS)

SALISBURY:      The State’s position is, the criminal trespass could not be an appropriate lesser included offense on an aggravated burglary, because the specific facts of the case are that he trespassed into a habitation….

                             The trespass into a habitation, Judge, is a burglary. It can’t be a criminal trespass.

COURT:              And a trespass into an unoccupied structure is a criminal trespass.  Is that your point?

SALISBURY:      Right, not into a habitation…. I believe there are cases that say it is fact specific, and under these facts that have come in front of this jury, criminal trespass does not apply.

                             We are not seeking a lesser included offense.

DEFENSE COUNSEL:  I did some research to be absolutely sure, but it’s my understanding that criminal trespass is a lesser included offense ….

COURT:              Can I tell you what I think he’s arguing?  And I’ve heard it before.  I guess that criminal trespass can, in certain situations, be a lesser included.  He’s (sic) arguing that, according to the facts of the case, because it’s a trespass into a habitation, that it’s different.  In other words, I think that you’re going to find that there are criminal trespass instructions given, but factually it would require them - - he’s arguing factually it wouldn’t.  So if you can find some cases, I’d love to look at them.

(Tr. 762 -765)

COURT:              Okay.  Here’s what I’m going to do. I’m giving the (A) (1) and (A) (4).  I’m not giving the criminal trespass

  (Tr. 949)

              Apparently the corrupt trial judge LAPDOG COLLIER overlooked the very basic fact that he had been overturned by the 9^th District Court of Appeals on the very issue of failure to instruct the jury of the lesser-included offense of criminal trespass in a burglary case tried before him by Salisbury, The Pathological Liar, on August 9, 2006, Medina County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 06CR0124.

              Quoting verbatim from the 9^th District Opinion, at ¶ 2:

Defendant was indicted on one count of burglary in the Medina County Court of Common Pleas in violation of R.C. 2911.12(A)(3), a third-degree felony for his unlawful entry into the home of Brenda Roberts and assault of Ms. Roberts’ guest, Allan Leach, on January 29, 2006.

State v Morris, 2008-Ohio-3209, ¶ 2

              The facts in Morris are such that Defendant Morris entered the habitation of Brenda Roberts, which, at the time of the alleged offense, was occupied by at least Allan Leach.

              The facts in Morris are strikingly similar to this case at bar insofar as Morris had frequently entered the home of Roberts on prior occasions, just as the Defendant had entered the Flintstone home on numerous prior occasions.  Further, in both Morris and this case , privilege came at issue.

              Ultimately the 9^th District Court of Appeals, in overturning LAPDOG COLLIER, held:

              Criminal trespass is a lesser included offense of aggravated burglary.

              State v. Morris, ¶ 5, Id.

             

If under any reasonable view of the evidence it is possible for the trier of fact to find the defendant not guilty of the greater offense and guilty of the lesser offense, the instruction on the lesser included offense must be given.  The evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the defendant. (Emphasis added) State v Deimling (Dec. 20, 2000), 9^th Dist. No. 99CA007496 at *1 quoting State v Wilkins (1980), 64 Ohio St.2d 382, 388.

State v. Morris, ¶ 6, Id.

LAPDOG COLLIER HAD A CONVENIENT LAPSE OF MEMORY, AFTER HAVING BEEN CHASTISED BY THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS FOR ABUSE OF DISCRETION, IN HIS PURSUIT OF RAILROADING THIS DEFENDANT, AN INNOCENT MAN!

MORE PROOF THAT MEDINA COUNTY NEEDS AN INDEPENDENT CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF ITS CORRUPT COURTS BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

COURT OF APPEALS CHASTISES SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, FOR PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, ALL TO NO AVAIL !!

In a matter unrelated to the the proceedings being profiled at this blog, the 9th District Court of Appeals at Akron, Ohio took particular note of the misconduct of Medina Assistant Prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR during a trial conducted before LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.


In his usual and customary manner, LAPDOG COLLIER permitted and facilitated the MISCONDUCT BY SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.


The specific matter involves the trial of Brian Johnson, Medina Common Please Case No. 08CR0282, tried on or about June 8, 2009.  The case can be found at the online docket of the Medina County Clerk of Court at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/DetailForm.aspx?case=08CR0282


Brian Johnson appealed his case, which was overturned, in  part, on the illegal sentence imposed by SALISBURY and HOLMAN through LAPDOG COLLIER.


THE APPELLATE DECISION CAN BE FOUND AT http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2011/2011-ohio-3623.pdf and is well worth the read, particularly at Pages 16 through 40, where the Court of Appeals addressees the PERVASIVE MISCONDUCT OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, THROUGHOUT THE TRIAL!


THE COURT OF APPEALS OFFERS A SCATHING ASSESSMENT OF THE PERVASIVE MISCONDUCT OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.


HERE ARE SOME EXCERPTS FROM THE OPINION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

"An embarrassing amount of (SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR'S) cross-examination reads more like the script of a television drama than the type of cross-examination that is expected of a prosecutor." [Paragraph 44].

"That cross-examination included numerous improper references to what the fourth woman ... testified at  her deposition.  During the cross-examination of Maryann Toney, for example, (SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR) repeatedly asked questions framed to improperly put before the jury what the (fourth woman) supposedly testified...." [Paragraph 46]. 

LAPDOG COLLIER, AS ONE WOULD EXPECT, OVERRULED A PROPER OBJECTION LODGED BY THE DEFENSE AND PERMITTED SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, TO CONTINUE TO OFFER HIS PERSONAL TESTIMONY.

"During his cross-examination of Erin McPherson, (SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR) again improperly put before the jury what the (fourth woman) has allegedly said...."  [Paragraph 47]

"(SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR'S) ""cross-examination" of these women was improper, and (LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE) the trial court should not have let him get away with it."  “In the first place, it is highly improper for any lawyer in the trial of any jury case, civil or criminal, to make what amounts to testimonial assertions under the pretext that he is merely ‘asking a question.’ Secondly, it is unprofessional to put before a jury, under the pretext of asking questions, information that is not in evidence.” State v. Daugherty, 41 Ohio App. 3d 91, 92-93 (1987) (citing 1 ABA Standards for Criminal Justice (2 Ed. 1980 and 1986 Supp.) 3.91, Standard 3-5.9 and DR 7-106(C)(1) of the Code of Professional Responsibility).  [Paragraph 49].

"By repeatedly referring to what (the fourth woman) supposedly testified at her deposition, the prosecutor was attempting to introduce testimony that was not properly before the jury. “While an attorney’s lack of familiarity with the Rules of Evidence may affect the question of whether misconduct was intentional or inadvertent, ignorance of the Rules of Evidence does not render questioning allowable where it would otherwise be improper.” City of Sidney v. Walters, 118 Ohio App. 3d 825, 829 (1997)." [Paragraph 49].

"During his cross-examination of Dr. Raggio, the prosecutor argued with her aboutwhether she had refused to talk to him before trial and whether she had canceled a scheduled telephone conference...."  [Paragraph 50]

AT THIS JUNCTURE, LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, OVERRULED ANOTHER PROPER DEFENSE OBJECTION.  THIS IS HOW LAPDOG COLLIER PRESERVES HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH, COMPLIMENTS OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEMOCRAT PARTY!

"The prosecutor’s final “question” in the above quoted exchange was not a question, it was a statement. Statements are appropriate for closing arguments. They are not appropriate cross-examination. Further, although the prosecutor repeated his claim during close, his statement was not true, or at least not supported by the record. Dr. Raggio testified, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, that N.J. had a Vitamin D deficiency that caused him to have abnormal bones and that his fractures were “consistent with a non-abuse situation.” Although some of the doctors who testified for the State disagreed with Dr. Raggio’s opinion, it was not true that all six of the doctors “brought in” by the State did."  [Paragraph 51].

Typically, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, was lying to the jury with the full approval of LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE!  HERE IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF LAPDOG COLLIER FACILITATING THE MISCONDUCT OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR:

“Q And I guess I’m a little unclear. I guess I don’t know. It’s a little unclear to me. Have you seen the x-rays or not?

A Yes, I have. ... .

Q Both the one from June and the one from January?25

A Correct.

Q  And is that the reason that you keep saying that that’s a poor indicator for telling bone fragility, because the bones upon x-ray appear absolutely normal?

A No.

Q That is not the reason, or they don’t appear normal?

A No, that’s not the reason.

Q They do appear normal?

A Correct.

Q And would it surprise you to learn that the two radiologists who testified for the State of Ohio disagree with that opinion that you have, that x-rays are not a good way to tell bone density?

Objection, you Honor.

THE COURT: Basis

[MR. JOHNSON’S LAWYER]: Dr. Skoblar did not say that. He said the opposite.

THE COURT: I’m going to overrule that objection. You can continue, if you know.

  

WHAT YOU HAVE JUST WITNESSED HERE IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF LAPDOG COLLIER RAILROADING A DEFENDANT! 

"Although Dr. Fleissner testified that N.J.’s injuries “were consistent with childabuse, he never used the phrase “classic child abuse” that (SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR) attributed to him.Again, therefore, (SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR) was either mischaracterizing Dr. Fleissner’s testimony or relying on a conversation that took place outside the record. Either of which was inappropriate. (SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR) repeated his improper statement during his closing argument."  [Paragraph 57].

"Another example of improper conduct occurred later in the prosecutor’s cross- examination of Dr. Raggio...." [Paragraph 58].

"Again, the prosecutor was arguing, not asking questions. Further, by stating that everyone he talked to disagreed with Dr. Raggio regarding the effect of a Vitamin D deficiency, the prosecutor could have lead the jury to believe he had had conversations with experts who did not testify."  [Paragraph 59]. 

"The prosecutor’s improper conduct continued during his cross-examination of Mr. Johnson...."  [Paragraph 60]. 

"The prosecutor also committed improper conduct during his closing argument by expressing his personal belief about Mr. Johnson’s credibility and by suggesting that his lawyers were insincere :

[Mr. Johnson’s lawyers] have done a fantastic job of confusing you, and if I didn’t know what I knew and if you didn’t know what you knew, you’d be thoroughly confused. Now, I would love to be able to interact with you, because I would ask, ‘Do you think that they think the fractures happened, or didn’t they?’ Because from those closing arguments, you certainly can’t tell, right? You kept hearing that the fractures weren’t there in the photos that you saw. ‘The kid’s fine. There’s nothing wrong with the boy.’ That’s what [one of Mr. Johnson’s lawyers] just said. Dr. Oehlenschlager would never know it because he didn’t have those fractures. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. We know that he did. We know that he did. Arethey disputing the fact that he has fractures? It seems that way, doesn’t it? But you can’t dispute that, you cannot dispute that, but they are disputing it, andthat’s, allegedly, the reason they are showing you those photos.

 [ONE OF MR. JOHNSON’S LAWYERS]:  Objection. 

THE COURT: Overruled. 

 [THE PROSECUTOR]: They are talking about Dr. O. as if he went to Dr. O.and he didn’t have any fractures. That’s what they’re saying to you. That’s what they said over and over and over again, both of them.Well, how ridiculous is that? They’re trying to confuse you. Did he have the fractures or not? ‘Yes, he did,’ or ‘No, he didn’t. That really sounds kind of like his client up there. Which is it?”  [Paragraph 61].

ONCE AGAIN YOU SEE LAPDOG COLLIER FACILITATING THE MISCONDUCT OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, BY PERMITTING HIM TO CONTINUE WITH AN IMPROPER ARGUMENT TO THE JURY!

"Lawyers are forbidden from stating a personal opinion about the credibility of awitness. State v. Smith, 14 Ohio St. 3d 13, 14 (1984). Despite that, the prosecutor in this case told the jury that he could have predicted that Mr. Johnson would lie on the witness stand and that he, in fact, did so. And in State v. Keenan, 66 Ohio St. 3d 402, 405 (1993), the Ohio Supreme Court wrote that imputing insincerity to defense counsel was improper. By suggesting to the jurors that Mr. Johnson’s lawyers were trying to confuse them, the prosecutor suggested that his lawyers did not believe in his innocence. That was improper."  [Paragraph 62].

"In Fears, former Chief Justice Moyer noted that courts often comment on the misconduct of prosecutors, but declare their conduct to be nonprejudicial in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt. State v. Fears, 86 Ohio St. 3d 329, 350 (1999) (Moyer, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). He noted that, despite the Ohio Supreme Court’s admonitions about misconduct, “our protestations have failed to change the advocacy of some prosecutors. It is as if they intentionally engage in improper conduct, safe in the belief that this 

court will continue to protest with no consequences.” Id. at 352. He recommended that reviewing courts, “[i]n the interest of the integrity of the criminal justice system in this state, . . . demonstrate that our protestations are more than utterings of frustration.” He also warned that “[r]efusing to address the fundamental unfairness of a trial riddled with prosecutorial misconduct because . . . [the reviewing] court deems the evidence of guilt to be overwhelming creates the perception that we protect the right to a fair trial only when we believe that the defendant is not guilty.” Id. at 353; see also United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co. Inc., 155 F.2d 631, 661 (1946) (Frank, J., dissenting) (“If we continue to do nothing practical to prevent [prosecutorial mis]conduct, we should cease to disapprove it. For otherwise . . . [t]he deprecatory words we use in our opinions on such occasions are purely ceremonial. . . . The practice . . . breeds a deplorably cynical attitude towards the judiciary.”). "  [Paragraph 69].

"....we note a suggestion from the Eighth District that, “[i]f we are to stop short of punishing the State for a prosecutor’s misbehavior by refusing to overturn otherwise valid convictions, perhaps such cases should routinely be referred to disciplinary counsel so that individual prosecutors can be impressed with the need for ethical behavior.” State v. Cody, 8th Dist. No. 77427, 2002-Ohio-7055, at ¶38."  [Paragraph 70]

IN THE MATTER OF THE CASE BEING PROFILED HERE AT THE BLOG, THE INNOCENT MAN, RAILROADED BY SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AND LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, HAS TAKEN THE ADVICE OF THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS AND  FILED A 350 PAGE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL AND PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT WITH THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE OHIO SUPREME COURT AGAINST LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN, AND SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR!!!

"(SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR) was argumentative, asked improper questions, made testimonial assertions, referred to facts that were not in the record, misrepresented the evidence, and expressed his personal opinion of Mr. Johnson’s credibility."  [Paragraph 73].

Certainly the Johnson case, cited above, should add impetus to the 350-page complaint of Judicial & Prosecutorial Conduct, filed against LAPDOG COLLIER, CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, and SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, because it, and other cases, unequivocally demonstrate an ongoing and longstanding pattern of corrupt practices and misconduct by LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN, AND SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR. 

SO THE MISCONDUCT GOES ON AND ON, UNABATED.  THE ONLY REMEDY TO THIS LEVEL OF CORRUPTION IS TO DISBAR COLLIER, HOLMAN, AND SALISBURY, AND SEND THEM ALL PACKING TO THE UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TO ATONE FOR THEIR CRIMES.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

SCHIZOPHRENIC CALIFORNIA MAN GETS THE "MEDINA TREATMENT"

Kelly Thomas, a 37 year-old California man suffering with mental illness, received the "Medina Treatment" from Fullerton, CA police .... he was beaten to death.

Particulars of this crime, committed by police against a harmless, mentally ill individual who suffered from schizophrenia, can be found here:
http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474979817005

A video of the beating and homicide of Kelly Clark, recorded by a bystander, can be found at:
http://orangepunch.ocregister.com/2011/08/03/kelly-thomas-beating-video/47557/

More California coverage of the murder of Kelly Thomas by Fullerton Police can be found here:
http://www.workingmannews.com/

Some interesting citizen commentary, and outrage, about this and related police actions can be found on YouTube at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1Nu3-fo9Xc

After reading some of the commentary, cited above, the blogger has noted the similarity to the corruption in Medina County politics.

However, and more compelling, the murder of Kelly Thomas by police calls to mind two events right here in Medina County.

The first is the killing of three young men by a Medina County Sheriff's Deputy who recklessly slammed into a disabled auto, killing three teens.  That Deputy was not charged with manslaughter, in spite of the fact that he took the lives of three innocent teens.  An account of that event can be found here at the blog at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/equal-protection-under-law-not-in.html

The second event is the tragic death of Susan Ruma, a local teacher who, while suffering mental illness, attempted suicide by inhaling exhaust fumes of her auto, running in the attached garage of her home.
Rather than attempting to seek mental health treatment for Ms. Ruma, DINO HOLMAN indicted and pressured Ms. Ruma to plead guilty to felony crimes.  


HOLMAN, in a response fitting for Fullerton, CA police, threw Ms. Ruma in the Medina County Jail  for 129 days and thereafter pressured her to plead guilty to Felonious Assault.


Why the Felonious Assault charge?  Well, according to HOLMAN, Ms. Ruma's children were in the family home at the time of her attempted suicide and, exercising the full capacity of both of his brain cells, decided that Ms. Ruma intended to kill her own children.

Following her treatment at the hands of HOLMAN and Medina Judge KIMBLER, not one of the brightest bulbs that ever lit the halls of the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station,
Ms. Ruma eventually succeeded at committing suicide.

Those particulars can be found in another post at this blog, captioned, "A HOLMANIZED CITIZEN DRIVEN TO SUICIDE," found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/holmanized-citizen-driven-to-suicide.html 

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

A SUITABLE REPLACEMENT FOR LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER!

Given the depth of corruption in the Medina County Courts, it seems only reasonable to expect that, sooner or later, LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, will be indicted and convicted in U.S District Court.

Thereafter, there arises the issue of whom the local politicians want to seat on the Medina County Court of Common Pleas without being properly elected by the electorate of Medina County.

A concerned citizen, and a regular reader of this blog, has sent along this link to a news article, reporting on a likely candidate who has the level of integrity matched by COLLIER and CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.

It is very worth clicking in this link to evaluate the credentials of a suitable candidate to replace LAPDOG COLLIER:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2019090/Judge-arrested-rape-charges-victim-secretly-filmed-carrying-attack.html

If the blogger were to hazard a guess, it would seem likely that this candidate has more on the ball, and knows more of Ohio law than LAPDOG COLLIER.

Come to think of it, these two "judges" resemble each other, bald heads and all!  Perhaps one day LAPDOG COLLIER and Murdoch may share the same cell.  They'll then be able to exchange "war stories" as to how each of them screwed the public, literally and figuratively.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

A HOLMANIZED CITIZEN DRIVEN TO SUICIDE!

Here is a classic case of stellar prosecutive work done by DINO HOLMAN and his crack criminal assistants (aptly described).

IF EVER THERE WAS A BASIS FOR A LAWSUIT, THIS IS IT... POLICE, PROSECUTORS, AND JUDGE!

A poor, troubled soul attempted suicide by inhaling exhaust fumes from her car, while the engine was running in her closed garage.  Now, before she had expired, her two children returned from school, found her, and called safety forces.

So far so good!

The victim survived, and here is where DINO HOLMAN stepped in and brought ruin and devastation to the life of this victim, ultimately driven to suicide by HOLMAN himself!

This account involves an entirely different cast of characters, with the exception of HOLMAN.  This case was handled by another of HOLMAN's criminal assistants, MATTHEW "MUSTAFAH" RAZAVI, another non-intellectual, and brought before the other worthless Medina County judge, JAMES KIMBLER!

It seems as though HOLMAN, who desires to punish anyone he doesn't care for, decided to INDICT, and therefore punish in accord with his mission statement, this poor soul!


What possibly could be the charge, you might ask yourself?

Well, HOLMAN decided that, by attempting to take her own life, this tortured soul had committed the multiple offenses of Felonious Assault upon her two children, who inhaled the exhaust fumes when they found their mother!

WHAT A BRILLIANT PIECE OF LOGIC THAT WAS!


Of course, rather than seeing to it that this poor, tortured soul received psychiatric treatment, with the full agreement of KIMBLER, HOLMAN just locked her up in the Medina County Jail!


NOW EVEN A MORON, WITH THE COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE OF HOLMAN, RAZAVI, AND KIMBLER, COULD FORESEE THAT THIS WAS A RECIPE FOR DISASTER.


Of course, HOLMAN, RAZAVI, and KIMBLER apparently "forgot" that, in order to prove the crime, they had to establish that the victim INTENDED to bring harm to her children.


Does anyone in his right mind think that this woman intended to harm her children by attempting to take her own life while her children were away at school?


Nevertheless, the victim was forced to plead guilty and, ultimately, successfully took her own life at a later date.  It is certainly reasonable to assume that, had she been given mental health treatment instead of being locked up, she may very well have been alive today.


Combing the Ohio Revised Code as I may, I have failed to find that suffering from a deep depression is a violation of law, UNLESS YOU LIVE IN MEDINA COUNTY!


ANY REAL JUDGE WOULD HAVE TOSSED THIS CASE AT THE OUTSET!


That thought alone is depressing, with all of the corrupt politicians on the loose!


THIS IS CERTAINLY ONE OF HOLMAN'S FINEST ACCOMPLISHMENTS, OF WHICH HE CAN BE DULY PROUD.  Wouldn't you?


Fine bit of police work, too!  I wonder who was the rocket scientist who decided this case (really, lack of a case) should go forward to the prosecutor's office, an obvious graduate of the SHERLOCK HOME SCHOOL OF INVESTIGATION (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH SHERLOCK HOLMES, THE FABLED DETECTIVE)!


I'm surprised that HOLMAN hasn't touted this accomplishment to the Medina Gazette, published by George Spudnutts on behalf of the Medina Chamber of Commerce.


Maybe he will, in the next election cycle.  That is, if he's still around.


I WONDER IF HOLMAN TRIED TO INDICT THIS VICTIM'S CORPSE AFTER HER DEATH? I wouldn't be a bit surprised by that.


After all, it would be a snap to hide evidence from her, in that state, wouldn't it? And a great way to boost that tarnished rate of conviction!


Perhaps HOLMAN will start visiting all the cemeteries in Medina County and indict the recently deceased.  Now there's an idea for you!  HOLMAN'S rate of conviction would surely soar then, wouldn't it?


When reviewing the case docket below, two thing should JUMP OUT AT YOU:


1)  HOLMAN'S OFFICE NEVER FILED A RESPONSE TO ANY OF THE MOTIONS FILED BY DEFENSE COUNSEL AND DID NOT, ON THE RECORD, FURNISH ANY OF THE EVIDENCE REQUESTED BY THE DEFENSE (A COMMON HOLMAN TACTIC); AND


2) KIMBLER NEVER RULED ON THE DEFENSE MOTIONS (ANOTHER HOLMAN TACTIC TO WHICH THESE JUDGES SUBSCRIBE)


Here's the case docket of this hardened criminal, taken from the Clerk of Court:





Case Information

Case #	Type	Title	Subtype	Status	Filed	Judge
09CR0003	Criminal	STATE OF OHIO - VS - SUSAN W RUMA	FELONY SUMMONS	DISPOSED	1/7/2009	JAMES L KIMBLER

Party Information

Type	Name	Active	Address	City	State	Zip	Attention	Phone #	Associations
DAT	BOWERS , EDMOND F	True	225 EAST LIBERTY STREET	MEDINA	OH	44256		(330) 725-3456	RUMA , SUSAN W [DEF]
DEF	RUMA , SUSAN W	True	985 COUNTRYSIDE	MEDINA	OH	44256			BOWERS , EDMOND F [DAT]

Charge Information

Code	Charge	Sentences
2903.11(A)(2)	2 CTS FELONIOUS ASSAULT (F-2)	GUILTY/NO CONTEST TO ORIGINAL CHARGE

Filing Information

Date	Title	Notes	Document
5/4/2010	ORDER TERMINATING SUPERVISION	EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY	View
6/8/2009	COSTS WAIVED		No Document
6/4/2009	ORDER FOR EXTRAORDINARY FEES	COUNSEL SHALL BE PAID $1295.00 FOR ATTY'S FEES.	View
5/28/2009	MOTION & ENTRY TO APPROVE COUNSEL FEES FILED	$1295.00	No Document
5/22/2009	SENTENCING ENTRY FILED	DEF CONVICTED OF 2 CTS FELONIOUS ASSAULT 2903.11(A)(2) (F-2). DEF INCARCERATED IN MEDINA COUNTY JAIL FOR 180 DAYS ; CREDIT FOR 129 DAYS. DEF IS PLACED UNDER INTENSIVE SUPERVISION OF APD FOR 5 YRS.; 24 HRS OF COMMUNITY SERVICE; DRUG/ALCOHOL ASSESSMENT; PLACED ON THE COURT'S MENTAL HEALTH DOCKET; CONTINUE ALL MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELING & MEDICATION; SHALL NOT POSSESS OR CONSUME ALCOHOL; SHALL ATTEND 4 AA/NA MEETINGS PER WEEK; SHALL NOT HAVE CONTACT W/ CHILDREN UNLESS PROPERLY SUPERVISED; SHALL SUBMIT TO DNA SAMPLE. COURT COSTS & MONTHLY SUPERVISION FEES ARE WAIVED.	View
5/22/2009	MOTION FOR EXTRAORDINARY FEES		View
5/14/2009	CERT FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER'S FEES		View
4/13/2009	SUBPOENA(S) RETURNED BAD SERVICE CERTIFIED MAIL		No Document
4/6/2009	CHANGE OF PLEA ENTRY FILED	DEF IN COURT W/ATTY EDMOND BOWERS. DEFT W/D PLEA & ENTERED PLEA OF NO CONTEST. CRT ACCEPTED PLEA & FOUND DEF GUILTY OF 2 CTS OF FELONIOUS ASSAULT 2903.11(A)(2) F-2. REFERRED TO APD FOR PSI. BOND CONTINUED. SENTENCING SET FOR 5/14/09 @ 8:30 AM.	View
4/2/2009	CERT FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER'S FEES		View
3/20/2009	SUBPOENA(S) RETURNED GOOD SERVICE		No Document
3/19/2009	SUBPOENA(S) ISSUED		No Document
3/19/2009	SUBPOENA(S) ISSUED		No Document
3/18/2009	HEARING SET	SANITY/COMPETENCY HRG SCHEDULED FOR 3/26/09 AT 2:15 PM.	View
3/16/2009	ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE	3/16/09 JURY TRIAL CONTINUED TO 4/20/09 AT 9:00 AM	View
3/13/2009	MOTION TO CONTINUE	THE JURY TRIAL (FILED BY DEFENSE)	View
2/19/2009	NOTICE OF INTENT TO CALL WITNESSES	& USE EXHIBITS (SUPPLEMENTAL)	No Document
2/13/2009	SUBPOENA(S) RETURNED GOOD SERVICE CERTIFIED MAIL		No Document
2/9/2009	SUBPOENA(S) RETURNED GOOD SERVICE		No Document
2/9/2009	SUBPOENA(S) ISSUED		No Document
2/4/2009	ORDER TO TRANSPORT TO PSYCHO-DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC	SHERIFF SHALL TRANSPORT DEFT TO PSYCHO-DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC AT 209 SOUTH HIGH STREET, AKRON, OH 44308-1610 FOR EVALUATION ON TUESDAY, 2/10/09 AT 9:00 AM. UPON COMPLETION DEFT MAY BE RETURNED TO MEDINA COUNTY JAIL.	View
2/3/2009	NOTICE OF INTENT TO CALL WITNESSES	AND USE EXHIBITS	No Document
1/30/2009	BILL OF PARTICULARS		View
1/30/2009	DEMAND FOR DISCOVERY FILED BY THE STATE		View
1/30/2009	ANSWER TO DEFENDANT'S DEMAND/REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY		No Document
1/21/2009	ORDER GRANTING DEF.'S MOTION	TO ENTER PLEA BY REASON ON NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY	View
1/21/2009	NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY PLEA ENTERED	ORDERED THAT PSYCHIATRIC & COMPETENCY EVALUATIONS BE DONE TO DETERMINE COMPETENCY & SANITY OF DEF BY AKRON PSYCHO-DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC	View
1/20/2009	CERT FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER'S FEES	FROM JANUARY 16, 2009 HRG	View
1/16/2009	NOTICE OF TRIAL/PRETRIAL ORDER/CRIMINAL SCHEDULING ORDER	TRIAL SET FOR 3/16/09 AT 9:00 AM; PRE-TRIAL SET FOR 3/9/09 AT 8:30 AM.	View
1/16/2009	ARRAIGNMENT ENTRY FILED	DEFT IN CRT WITH ATTY BOWERS. NOT GUILTY PLEA ENTERED. BOND CONTINUED. .	View
1/16/2009	ORDER APPOINTING ATTORNEY	CRT CONTINUED THE APPOINTMENT OF ATTY BOWERS FROM MUNICIPAL COURT.	View
1/16/2009	ENTRY	OF PLEA, NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY	View
1/16/2009	MOTION FOR ORDER	PERMITTING DEFT TO ENTER A PLEA OF NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY & FOR AN ORDER FOR A PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION	View
1/16/2009	MOTION TO REQUIRE THE STATE TO REVEAL ANY AGREE. ENT'D INTO	BETWEEN THE STATE & ANY PROSECUTION WITNESS THAT COULD CONCEIVABLY INFLUENCE HIS TESTIMONY	View
1/16/2009	MOTION TO DISCLOSE IDENTITIES OF ANY INFORMANTS		View
1/16/2009	MOTION FOR BILL OF PARTICULARS		View
1/16/2009	DEMAND/REQUEST FOR THE INFORMATION PACKET		View
1/16/2009	REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY BY DEFENDANT		View
1/16/2009	MOTION TO EXAMINE EXCULPATORY/MITIGATORY MATERIAL		View
1/15/2009	EMAIL TO MEDINA MUNICIPAL COURT		View
1/14/2009	TRANSCRIPT FROM MEDINA MUNICIPAL COURT	CASE # 09CRA00020	No Document
1/8/2009	SUMMONS RETURNED AND FILED		View
1/7/2009	SUMMONS & COPIES ISSUED TO SHERIFF	ARRAIGNMENT 1/16/09 @ 8:30 AM (IN JAIL)	View
1/7/2009	INDICTMENT AND REQUEST FOR SUMMONS		View
1/7/2009	CRIMINAL CASE FILED		No Document

BY APPLYING THE LEGAL ANALYSIS THAT HOLMAN EMPLOYED BY BRINGING A PROSECUTION IN THIS CASE, HOLMAN SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH THE MURDER OF THIS INNOCENT VICTIM SOUL!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

DINO HOLMAN HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF CORRUPT ACTIVITY IN THE PAST!

Interestingly, it appears that corrupt Medina County prosecutor DEAN HOLMAN has been around the block a time or two in the past.

If you follow this link to the Sandusky Register, found at http://www.sanduskyregister.com/cleveland/2010/sep/15/former-dem-chairman-cleveland-indicted?page=1  you will find the text of a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.  Cited immediately below is but one paragraph from the lawsuit, alleging unspecified corrupt activity by Medina County prosecutor DEAN HOLMAN.  Not much of a surprise at this end!

59. In late December 2001, Plaintiff learned from African American Krista Harris then 27years old that she had been kept as a sex slave for about four years by Defendant Kevin Baxter starting when she was 20 years old under threat of false criminal charges, and forced to provide perjured testimony in the murder cases of three African American males in order that Defendant Baxtercould obtain tainted convictions and wrest control of key drug trafficking interests from African American gangs over to the organized crime interests Defendant Baxter protects to this day. Ms. Harris provided Plaintiff with her affidavit filed in Erie County Common Pleas Court in support of a Motion to Appoint a Special prosecutor to investigate Defendant Baxter and yet another illegally appointed special prosecutor Dean Holman of Medina County for corrupt activity.  The Affidavit also reported Defendant Baxter’s drug abuse, and theft of public resources to provide a love nest in Cleveland Ohio.  Ms. Krista Harris was interviewed by BCI SA Rex Russell as part of his investigation of Defendant Baxter.  However to this day, Defendant Maschari has failed to appoint a special prosecutor despite three additional later filed Motions reporting probate fraud crimes and other crimes committed by Defendant Baxter, so that law enforcement has no prosecutor to present its case on behalf of the people of Ohio.
    
    YOU WON'T SEE ANYTHING LIKE THIS PRINTED IN GEORGE SPUDNUTT'S MEDINA GAZETTE!
    MUCH MORE TO COME ....