Sunday, November 14, 2010

CAN judge "COLLIER" ACTUALLY READ?

I am perplexed about the apparent lack of ability of judge "COLLIER" to read with comprehension and make a decision based upon what he has just purportedly read.

Take, for example, the issue of legal briefs.

Competent lawyers research the case law and write legal briefs, advancing their legal arguments supported by the case law.

If you check any of the cases assigned to "COLLIER," you will find that assistant county prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY aka SLEAZEBURY does not write any legal briefs. That simple fact can be verified by simply scanning the dockets of various cases assigned to "COLLIER" at the website of the
Medina County Clerk of Courts, found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/clerk/clrkhome.htm

That fact alone is sufficient evidence to know that "COLLIER"is corrupt and that SLEAZEBURY can rely upon the "judge" to rule in his favor without due regard for the law.

Nevertheless, defense attorneys do write legal briefs and file them for consideration  by "COLLIER." Even though defense attorneys file such briefs, "COLLIER" apparently gives them no thought and consideration, if he reads them at all (which is highly doubtful), when he denies defense motions and consistently rules in favor of SLEAZEBURY, notwithstanding the law.

Based upon this fact alone, I have concluded that, given his intellectual capabilities, the only briefs "COLLIER" actually reads are labeled "JOCKEY."

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

No comments:

Post a Comment