HOW TO DETERMINE WHEN CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS ARE LYING

Attorneys are presumed to be always under oath and are  presumed to be always speaking the truth.

WHAT A LAUGHER!


More often than not, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DINO HOLMAN and his CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS speak with forked tongue, as Tonto used to say.


The question arises, therefore, as to when one can tell whether or not HOLMAN and his CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS ARE LYING.


The answer to this decades old question is that there are two primary indicators of deception!


THE FIRST INDICATOR


One sure way to tell that CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS ARE LYING IS WHEN YOU SEE THEIR LIPS MOVING!


THE SECOND INDICATOR


You can always tell, without fail, that HOLMAN and HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS ARE LYING WHEN THEY CHARACTERIZE ANY PROPOSITION ASSERTED BY ANY RAILROADED INNOCENT CITIZEN AS "ALL LIES." 


CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DINO HOLMAN AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS ARE IN THE HABIT OF ATTRIBUTING THEIR MISCONDUCT TO ANY INNOCENT CITIZEN, WHOM THEY HAVE RAILROADED, WITHIN RANGE.


Following is one such example.


In the prior post at this blog, readers were exposed to the credible claim of Mr. Jason Cubic that ASS. PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, and SALISBURY'S COHORT "MUSTAFAH" RAZAVI, had threatened him with the loss of his children unless he agreed to plead guilty following his constitutionally defective and unlawful arrest arising from an illegal search and seizure that was rubber-stamped by LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER.


In a typical cowardly reply to the credible complaints of  Mr. Cubic, the Office of CORRUPT MEDINA PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN actually filed a written filing, one the of the very few filed in the past decade.


In the response, filed by "MUSTAFAH" RAZAVI, which could have easily been composed by SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, "MUSTAFAH" characterized Mr. Cubic's credible complaint as "ALL LIES."


RIGHT AWAY IT IS OBVIOUS THAT MR. CUBIC IS TELLING THE TRUTH.

Picture below is the false, fraudulent, and disingenuous filing from "MUSTAFAH" RAZAVI:

THE READER WILL NOT THAT "MUSTAFAH" RAZAVI HAS MADE THE TYPICAL HOLMANESQUE CLAIM, "THEY ARE LIES."


SURE, IN A PIG'S EYE!


The reader will also note that RAZAVI vouched for himself by claiming to have discussed the matter of the threats with Attorney Spears and Mr. Spears assured RAZAVI that RAZAVI didn't make any threats.


SURE, IN A PIG'S EYE!


THE READER WILL NOTE THAT IT IS THE USUAL AND CUSTOMARY PRACTICE OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANT TO MAKE BOLD DENIALS OF THEIR BLATANT MISCONDUCT, BUT THEY NEVER SUPPORT THEIR DENIALS WITH ANY EVIDENCE OR PROOF!


JUST MORE BUSINESS AS USUAL IN THE CORRUPT COURTS OF MEDINA COUNTY!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

ONE MORE CONSTITUTIONALLY DEFECTIVE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT !

In the prior post at this blog, readers were exposed to the case of State v Cubic and shown that LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE had rubber-stamped a search warrant for a Brunswick residence that clearly lacked the essential elements to form probable cause to search for evidence of the unlawful manufacture of methamphetamine.

Mr. Cubic, who was arrested and later charged with criminal offenses relating to the manufacture of methamphetamine.

Readers should not construe that this blogger approves of the manufacture and distribution of methamphetamine, which is a terrible street drug of abuse and has ruined so many lives.

The issue here is whether the actions of the drug agents, and LAPDOG COLLIER, comport with the requirements of the United States Constitution, which, in the blogger's opinion, clearly do not.


The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution is in place to protect citizens from unreasonable search and seizure.  It is obvious that LAPDOG COLLIER routinely denies the citizens of Medina County their Fourth Amendment protections, all for the sole purpose of preserving his lifetime uncontested appointment to the Medina County bench, compliments of  Corrupt Medina County Dem Prosecutor Dino Holman and the Medina County Dem Party.


Following his guilty plea and sentencing, Mr. Cubic raised a number of issues, including the matter of the constitutionally defective criminal complaint, lacking the constitutionally mandated statement of essential facts, required by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Rule 3 of the Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Pictured below is a copy of the constitutionally defective criminal complaint issued by the Medina Municipal Court, which can be found at the Clerk's website at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=08CR0075&p=1&a=110 .

BUSINESS AS USUAL IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS, WHERE THE LAW PROTECTING CITIZENS HAS BEEN COMPLETELY DISREGARDED IN AND BY A TOTALLY CORRUPT CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.


Mr. Cubic raised another totally credible issue.  Mr. Cubic complains that SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, "threatened to give my wife ... as much time as possible, and threatened to take our children from her if I did not plead out."

MORE BUSINESS AS USUAL IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS, WHERE THE LAW PROTECTING CITIZENS HAS BEEN COMPLETELY DISREGARDED IN AND BY A TOTALLY CORRUPT CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.

Mr. Cubic's letter to Visiting Judge R. Patrick Kelly regarding SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, can be found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=08CR0075&p=1&a=108 .

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

BURGER KING, BEWARE !!!!

Based upon a ruling by Medina County Judge James Kimbler, in support of a "finding" of probable  cause by LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, to issue a search warrant on account of "cars coming and going," BURGER KING RESTAURANTS SHOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE BY MEDINA COUNTY POLICE!


FIRSTLY, IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT LAPDOG COLLIER HAS ABSOLUTELY NO CONCEPT OF THE ELEMENTS REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH PROBABLE CAUSE AND DOES NOTHING MORE THAN RUBBER-STAMP ANYTHING THAT COMES BEFORE HIM.  IN SO DOING, HE DEMONSTRATES DAILY THAT HE IS NOTHING MORE THAN THE "PAVLOV DOG" BELONGING TO CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.


The case that demonstrates that LAPDOG COLLIER qualifies, once again, as THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE can be found at the website of the Clerk of the Medina County Kangaroo Courts, identified as State v Jason Cubic, Case No. 08CR0075.

Initially, it is worth the time to read Mr. Cubic's Motion to Suppress Illegally Seized Evidence, found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=08CR0075&p=1&a=27 .

The Motion to Suppress Illegally Seized Evidence was filed on behalf of Mr. Cubic by his defense attorney Ronald Spears.  The case was prosecuted for CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN by none other than ASS. PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.


Right off the bat, the reader will recognize that Mr. Cubic will be deprived of his Constitutional Rights.


Attorney Spears has done an admiral job of pointing out the manifold deficiencies of the application for the search warrant, attached to the Motion to Suppress in Mr. Spears' pleading.

Attorney Spears adequately points out all of the legal deficiencies that LAPDOG COLLIER conveniently overlooked as he rubber-stamped the search warrant in the Cubic case:

1)  Based on an anonymous tip that Cubic was manufacturing methamphetamine in a garage on Rocklyn Ave. in Brunswick, Medina County Drug Task Force agents conducted surveillance of the residence and :
     a)  observed several vehicles visited the Rocklyn address on four separate days;
     b)  failed to provide any vehicle descriptions or license plate numbers;
     c)  failed to identify or even describe persons visiting the Rocklyn residence;
     d)  failed to provide any information as to which structure, house or garage, the visitors entered;
     e)  pulled trash and found vegetable matter that presumptively field-tested positive for marijuana;
     f)  trash pulls failed to produce any evidence of the possession or manufacture of methamphetamine;                                                                                                              

     g) determined that Cubic purchased tablets containing pseudoephedrine from local drug stores over a 15-month period;                                                                                             

    h) made no controlled purchases of methamphetamine from Cubic or from the Rocklyn address;

     i)  failed to identify which of the two garages on the property, if any, were allegedly used to manufacture methamphetamine;
     j)  the location of the actual residence of Jason Cubic;
     k) the owner of the residence on Rocklyn;
     l) the identities of the residents of the Rocklyn address, and more.

As usual, the office of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN failed to file any opposition to Mr. Cubic's Motion to Suppress, relying instead upon the largess of the Medina County Judges to rule against Mr. Cubic, in spite of the typical sloppy police work that is the hallmark of the Medina County court system.


JUST WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT A CONCLUSION THAT METHAMPHETAMINE WAS PROBABLY BEING MANUFACTURED AT THE ROCKLYN ADDRESS?

LAPDOG COLLIER ultimately recused himself from railroading Mr. Cubic after Mr. Cubic raised the issue of the suppression of the search warrant rubber-stamped by LAPDOG COLLIER. 


Mr. Cubic's case was transferred to Judge James Kimbler who, unlike LAPDOG COLLIER, took the time and trouble to issue a written decision on the suppression motion, errant though it may be.

Judge Kimbler, in apparent allegiance to LAPDOG COLLIER and DINO HOLMAN, denied Mr. Cubic's Motion to Suppress.  Judge Kimbler's written decision can be found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=08CR0075&p=1&a=35 .

It is refreshing to see that Judge Kimbler, unlike LAPDOG COLLIER, has some familiarity with the law, including the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Illinois v Gates, which has been discussed in an earlier post at this blog.   


It is troubling, however, that Judge Kimbler failed to suppress the evidence that was seized on the basis of a search warrant that clearly lacked probable cause to search for the materials seized.


Judge Kimbler based his decision, in part, because the drug agents "saw several cars come and go from the residence."


BASED ON JUDGE KIMBLER'S RULING, IN SUPPORT OF THE SEARCH WARRANT RUBBER-STAMPED BY LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER, ALL FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS IN MEDINA COUNTY ARE IN PERIL.


HOW MANY CARS COME AND GO FROM THE LOCAL BURGER KING?


MUCH MORE TO COME .....

A SURPRISE CHRISTMAS GIFT FOR LAPDOG JUDGE CHRIS COLLIER FROM MEDINA COURT REPORTERS

Medina Court Reporters, the local court reporting service under contract to LAPDOG COLLIER to provide court reporting services for the many and varied tainted proceedings in KANGAROO COURTROOM NO. 1 at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station, has come up with a novel and useful Christmas gift for LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.


It is certainly regrettable that, after so many years of corrupting the Medina County justice system, LAPDOG COLLIER has finally been CAUGHT RED-HANDED TAMPERING WITH A TRIAL RECORD.


Apparently LAPDOG COLLIER thought he could get away with this crime undetected for many years to come, as he has in past years.


ALAS, THE JIG IS UP!


However, with no real remorse, Medina Court Reporters has gifted LAPDOG COLLIER in the fashion pictured below:

The above-pictured knitting kit will be treasured by LAPDOG COLLIER for years to come!


LAPDOG COLLIER WILL BE ABLE TO KNIT SOCKS FOR HIMSELF AND A SCARF OR TWO IN HIS DORMITORY AT ONE OF THE FABULOUS CAMPS OPERATED BY THE U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS WHILE LAPDOG COLLIER IS ON "VACATION" FROM MEDINA FOR THE NEXT FEW YEARS.


The blogger is certain that gift is most appreciated by LAPDOG COLLIER, given in the spirit of the Christmas Season.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

THE ANNUAL MEDINA COUNTY CHRISTMAS SPELLING BEE!

Once again, the Medina County Chamber of Commerce has held its annual Christmas Spelling Bee. The event is sponsored, in part by George Spudnutt's Medina Gasette, the official oracle of the Chamber of Commerce.

The Chamber of Commerce holds the Medina County Christmas Spelling Bee each year, open only to Medina County "public officials," so that Medina County citizens have the opportunity to observe their elected officials and other members of the local bureaucracy up close and personal.

This year's event, as in past years, was an unqualified success to the extent that Medina County citizens were treated to a display of just how unqualified are their "public officials."

Following are but a few highlights from this year's Medina County Christmas Spelling Bee:

Members of the corrupt Medina County court system did not fare very well, given the level of competition.

MEDINA COUNTY ASS. PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR was eliminated in the first round when he was unable to spell "ESP."


SALISBURY stomped his feet and filed an immediate protest, claiming to judges, "I know how to spell the word 'LETTICE."  [ See prior post, captioned SALISBURY CONTINUES TO LIE, CLAIMS HE CAN SPELL! found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/03/salisbury-continues-to-lie-claims-he.html  ]
After the raucous laughter from the crowd subsided, judges relented and permitted SALISBURY to continue on.

However, disaster struck when SALISBURY, when given another word, was unable to spell "FBI."

Despite his best intellectual efforts, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, was eliminated, much to the chagrin of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN who has long favored SALISBURY as the one true "intellectual" in his office.


Next up was LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRIS COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE. Nobody expected much of performance from LAPDOG COLLIER and were neither surprised nor disappointed when LAPDOG was eliminated in the first round as well.


Preliminarily, LAPDOG COLLIER was asked to spell "PAVLOV."  Before LAPDOG COLLIER could even begin to stutter and stammer, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN jumped up and objected immediately, shouting, "This is completely unfair!  COLLIER has been my "PAVLOV DOG" for years and he darn well knows how to spell it!"


The crowd in attendance was in full agreement with this statement from DINO HOLMAN and signaled their agreement with polite, if subdued, applause.

Contest judges relented and agreed to permit LAPDOG COLLIER to continue, asking him to spell the word "ELECTION."  LAPDOG COLLIER was completely dumbfounded and unable to spell the word, since he has never had to face a REAL ELECTION in all these long years, since he has been granted a lifetime uncontested political appointment to the Medina County Bench by Corrupt Medina Dem County Prosecutor Dino Holman and the Medina County Dem Party.  


All LAPDOG COLLIER has had to do to preserve his lifetime appointment is simply to unfailingly follow instructions and take his marching orders from HOLMAN.


Needless to say, LAPDOG COLLIER was eliminated in the first round.

Next up was CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN who fared no better than SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, or LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG."


Before HOLMAN had time to prepare AFFIDAVITS OF DISQUALIFICATION to remove the contest judges, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN was asked to spell the word "ETHICS."


HOLMAN was astonished and gave the contest judges a bewildered look as he asked, "Why would you ask me to spell such a word?  I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT IT MEANS!"


Needless to say, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN was also eliminated in the first round.

Afterward, HOLMAN was heard to mutter to SALISBURY, "You can bet that I'm going to win this thing next year.  I'll appoint COLLIER as a judge and he will make sure that everyone but me is eliminated."


So it goes in the Yule Season in Medina County!  Corruption in Medina County never takes a holiday break!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

A SPECIAL CHRISTMAS GIFT FOR LAPDOG COLLIER. CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, AND MEDINA ASS. PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR

In the prior post at this blog, this blog presented the 2011 Christmas Wish List of corrupt LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.


The blogger, in presenting LAPDOG COLLIER'S Wish List, intended no slight or offense to CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND HIS ASS. SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.


LAPDOG COLLIER'S Wish List, however, will benefit both CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND HIS ASS., SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.


Notwithstanding all of those gifts that are embraced by LAPDOG COLLIER'S Wish List, this blogger has formed the intention to present a very special gift to LAPDOG COLLIER, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND HIS ASS., SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.


As has been repeatedly demonstrated at this blog by presentation of the facts and the evidence, all three of these common criminals have worked so diligently throughout all of these long years to taint and corrupt the Medina County Courts.

As a result of their longstanding pattern of egregious misconduct and corrupt practices, intended to and having the intended effect of depriving Medina County citizens of their Constitutional Rights and the Rule of Law, the blogger has vowed to present LAPDOG COLLIER, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND HIS ASS., SALISBURY THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, with a very special gift, pictured below:

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG COLLIER'S CHRISTMAS WISH LIST

LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER,  THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, has his very own Christmas Wish List, tailored to meet the pressing demands of his responsibilities as the "PAVLOV DOG" of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.


#1 WISH, FOR TAMPERING WITH ALL OF THOSE PESKY TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS THAT, IF LEFT UNALTERED, WOULD DEMONSTRATE TO THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS JUST WHAT AN IGNORAMUS AND DIRTBALL HE REALLY IS, LAPDOG COLLIER WISHES FOR A FULL CASE OF  ERASERS!

#2 WISH ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S MOST-WANTED CHRISTMAS GIFT WISH LIST, TO BE USED FOR EXCISING AND CUTTING OUT WHOLE SECTIONS OF TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS IN ORDER TO DEPRIVE INNOCENT CITIZENS OF FAIR HEARING ON APPEAL, A NEW PAIR OF LONG LASTING TITANIUM SCISSORS, STRONG ENOUGH TO LAST THROUGH ONE FULL YEAR OF TRANSCRIPT TAMPERING!

#3 WISH ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S WISH LIST FOR THE UPCOMING CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY, TO OFFER HIM SOME RELIEF FROM HIS DAILY APPEARANCES BEFORE CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, LAPDOG COLLIER WISHES FOR A NEW PAIR OF REINFORCED INDUSTRIAL GRADE DOUBLE-STRENGTH KNEE PADS!


#4 WISH ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S WISH LIST, TO DESTROY ALL OF THAT EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE HE CONCEALS AND WITHHOLDS FROM INNOCENT DEFENDANTS, ALL FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF RAILROADING INNOCENT CITIZENS INTO PRISON SO AS TO PRESERVE HIS FIRM GRIP ON HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH, COMPLIMENTS OF CORRUPT MEDINA DEM PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEM PARTY, A BRAND NEW SUPER DUTY PAPER AND PHOTOGRAPH SHREDDER!

#5 WISH ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S 2011 CHRISTMAS WISH LIST, DESIRED FOR DISPOSING OF ALL THOSE DEFENSE BRIEFS HE REFUSES TO READ AND CONSIDER, AN OVERSIZED LAPDOG COLLIER "ROUND FILE!"

#6 WISH ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S WISH LIST, TO REMIND HIM OF MEDINA ASS. PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, WHEN SALISBURY IS NOT AROUND TO MEET EX PARTE IN LAPDOG COLLIER'S CHAMBERS TO ISSUE ORDERS, INSTRUCTIONS, AND RULINGS TO LAPDOG COLLIER, A SIMULATED LIFE-SIZED WEENIE!

#7 WISH ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S WISH LIST, SPECIFICALLY FOR PRESERVING HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH, A NEW TOOL KIT USED FOR "FIXING" CASES FOR CORRUPT MEDINA PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN!

#8 WISH ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S CHRISTMAS WISH LIST, TO BE USED FOR TABULATING ALL THE VOTES HE GETS IN HIS NEXT UNCONTESTED RIGGED MEDINA COUNTY ELECTION, COMPLIMENTS OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DEM PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEM PARTY,  AN UNOPPOSED VOTE TABULATING CALCULATOR!

#9 ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S WISH LIST, FOR LAPDOG COLLIER, DINO HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG," TO PRESENT TO ANY DEFENSE ATTORNEY SEEKING TO GO TO TRIAL IN LAPDOG COLLIER'S CORRUPT KANGAROO COURTROOM NO. 1, A PAIR OF LOADED DICE THAT ALWAYS COMES UP SNAKE EYES!

#10 WISH ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S WISH LIST IS THE PROMISE OF CORRUPT MEDINA DEM PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEM PARTY, IN EXCHANGE FOR SERVING IN TOTAL OBEDIENCE TO DINO HOLMAN, CONTRARY TO THE LAW AND THE RULES OF EVIDENCE, AN UNOPPOSED FOURTH TERM TO PERPETUATE HIS LIFETIME UNCONTESTED APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH!

#11 ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S WISH LIST, TO SATISFY HIS ALLEGIANCE TO THE MEDINA COUNTY KKK, ANOTHER INNOCENT MINORITY MEDINA COUNTY CITIZEN TO RAILROAD INTO PRISON!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER PROVES TO BE HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG" IN YET ANOTHER CASE!

LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, has demonstrated in yet another case that he is nothing more than a stooge for CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and that he is no more than HOLMAN'S VERY OWN "PAVLOV DOG!"


It is ore than interesting to review the facts in the case of State v, Shawn Wheeland, Medina County Case No. 05CR0095, which can be accessed at the website of the Medina County Clerk of Court at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/DetailForm.aspx?case=05CR0095 .

State v Wheeland was prosecuted by SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, before none other than LAPDOG COLLIER.


The Ninth District Court of Appeals reversed and overturned the conviction of Mr. Wheeland because, as the Ninth District concluded, LAPDOG COLLIER ABUSED HIS DISCRETION BY FAILING TO CONSIDER COMPETENT, CREDIBLE EVIDENCE AS HE RAILROADED ANOTHER INNOCENT CITIZEN INTO PRISON, ALL FOR THE SAKE OF PRESERVING HIS FIRM GRIP ON HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH BY BOWING TO THE DICTATES OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.


The opinion of the Ninth District Court of Appeals in State v Wheeland, Court of Appeals Case. No. 06CA0034-M can be found at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2007/2007-ohio-1213.pdf  .

BELOW IS A SUMMATION, TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM THE NINTH DISTRICT OPINION:

{¶2} Appellant was indicted on February 16, 2005, on one count offelonious assault in violation of R.C. 2903.11(A)(1), a felony of the second degree, and one count of child endangering in violation of R.C. 2919.22(B)(1)(E)(1)(d), a felony of the second degree. The charges arose out of an incident in which a five-month old baby was shaken and suffered injuries. Appellant was watching the baby overnight after the mother dropped the baby off
before going to work. Appellant maintained that the baby began to looked dazed and vomit after falling off a couch. Appellant pled not guilty to the charges. Appellant was held in jail pending resolution of the matter on a $100,000.00 bond.

Undoubtedly, LAPDOG COLLIER held Mr. Wheeland in lieu of the $100,000 bond set by CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.  [See prior post, captioned

CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN SETS BAIL FOR EVERY CITIZEN WHO APPEARS BEFORE LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE COLLIER, CONTRARY TO LAW! found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/12/corrupt-medina-county-prosecutor-dino.html ]

{¶3} On January 17, 2006, appellant appeared before the court for a change of plea hearing. The State moved to dismiss the charge of felonious assault in exchange for appellant’s pleading guilty to the charge of child endangering. The State further asserted that it would agree to a one-year term of incarceration. 

In the usual and customary practice in the art of the Medina County double-cross, LAPDOG COLLIER sentenced Mr. Wheeland to TWO YEARS IN PRISON MANDATED BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN rather than the one year prison term disingenuously offered by HOLMAN to coerce a guilty plea from Mr. Wheeland.  [ See prior post, captioned THE ART OF THE FIX AND THE DOUBLE-CROSS IN MEDINA COURT, found at
http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/art-of-fix-and-couble-cross-in-medina.html ]


HERE'S THE SENTENCING ENTRY FROM THE CLERK'S WEBSITE:

4/26/2006

SENTENCING ENTRY FILED

1439/710-711, DEFT CONVICTED OF 2919.22(B)(1(E)(1)(d) ENDANGERING CHILDREN, F-2 SUBJECT TO A PRESUMPTION IN FAVOR OF PRISON. CRT ORDERS DEFT TO SERVE 2 YRS IN PRISON, W/CREDIT FOR 425 DAYS SERVED. ALL COSTS WAIVED. DEFT SHALL SUBMIT DNA SAMPLE.

 TURNING ONCE AGAIN TO THE APPELLATE DECISION:

{¶4} On February 21, 2006, appellant moved for a continuance of sentencing, which the court granted. On February 27, 2006, the trial court heard comments from the injured infant’s mother for consideration in regard to appellant’s sentencing. The child’s mother informed the court that the child was “doing really well.” The trial judge informed the mother that he had a “problem” with the fact that appellant told the probation department that he had not shaken the child.

In his usual and customary  fashion, LAPDOG COLLIER DENIED MR. WHEELAND THE CONSTITUTIONALLY MANDATED PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE solely with the intended purpose of preserving his grip on his uncontested lifetime appointment to the Medina County Bench compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA DEM PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND MEDINA COUNTY DEM PARTY.

{¶5} On March 3, 2006, prior to sentencing, appellant filed a motion to withdraw his plea. He argued that he had never acknowledged shaking the child
and that a witness had just come forward with newly discovered evidence tending to show that appellant “was perhaps not guilty or had a complete defense to the charge.” On March 3, 2006, the trial court held a hearing on appellant’s motion to withdraw his plea. At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court took the matter under consideration, but apparently orally informed the parties that it denied the motion.... Later the same day, the trial court issued an order denying appellant’s motion to withdraw his plea without analysis.

LAPDOG COLLIER issued his "order" without analysis since he conducted none, but simply did as he was instructed by CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS (A MORE THAN APT CHARACTERIZATION).   [ See prior post, captioned LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER PROVES HIMSELF TO BE A COMPLETE WHORE, ON THE TRIAL RECORD!, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/06/lapdog-judge-collier-proves-himself-to.html ]

{¶6} Also on April 24, 2006, the matter proceeded to sentencing. Prior to sentencing, appellant inquired regarding the trial court’s rulings on his motion for reconsideration and motion for conclusions of law and findings of fact. The trial court orally denied both motions, asserting that it found both defense witnesses at the hearing on the motion to withdraw the plea to be “singularly incredible – not credible.” The trial court then sentenced appellant to two years in prison.

Once again, LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, completely ignored the truthful testimony of credible witnesses solely for the sake of preserving his lifetime uncontested political appointment to the Medina County Bench by simply doing the bidding of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, CONTRARY TO THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.

{¶14} There is further no evidence to show that the State would be prejudiced by an order allowing appellant to withdraw his guilty plea. This Court has held, “‘Before sentencing, the inconvenience to court and prosecution resulting from a change of plea is ordinarily slight as compared with the public interest in protecting the right of the accused to trial by jury.’” Eklich, supra, quoting Kadwell v. United States (C.A.9, 1963), 315 F.2d 667, 670.

The reference by the Ninth District Court of Appeals to "protecting the RIGHT of the accused to trial by jury" is of little concern to LAPDOG COLLIER, WHO DAILY DEPRIVES ACCUSED PERSONS OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND THE PROTECTIONS OF THE OHIO RULES OF EVIDENCE, all for the purpose of preserving his lifetime political appointment to the Medina County Bench.  [ See prior post, captioned CORRUPTION REIGNS IN THE MEDINA COUNTY CRIMINAL INJUSTICE SYSTEM, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/corruption-reigns-in-medina-county.html ]

{¶16}The trial court did not, however, inform appellant that he was waiving his right to remain silent and not testify.

NOT MUCH OF A SURPRISE THERE, SINCE LAPDOG COLLIER HAS DEMONSTRATED BY HIS RULINGS THAT HE CONSIDERS MIRANDA WARNINGS TO BE NOTHING MORE THAN AN ANNOYANCE AND HE COMPLETELY DISREGARDS THE RULINGS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IN THIS REGARD. 

{¶18} Appellant presented the testimony of two witnesses at the March 3, 2006 hearing on his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Roosevelt Shelton is appellant’s neighbor. He testified that a co-worker, Eskia Taylor, told him approximately two-and-a-half weeks earlier that the victim child’s mother told her that she thought she had shaken her baby too hard. Mr. Roosevelt testified that the subject of appellant’s case came up during their conversation about people that they both knew from the Wadsworth area. He further testified that he told Ms. Taylor that she should tell appellant’s father what she had told him but Ms. Taylor declined, because she did not want to get involved. Mr. Roosevelt testified that he went to appellant’s father that evening after work and told him what Ms. Taylor had said during their conversation. Mr. Roosevelt asserted that he does not know Nina King, the victim child’s mother. 

{¶19} Eskia Taylor testified that she and Mr. Roosevelt were having a conversation at work about appellant’s case. Mr. Roosevelt told her that he was a neighbor of appellant’s parents. Ms. Taylor testified that she knew Nina King and
that they “hung out” together when they were younger. She testified that she ran into Ms. King at Medina County Job and Family Services one day in January 2005 and that they engaged in small talk, catching up on one another’s lives. Ms. Taylor testified that she knew that child protective services had taken the victim child from Ms. King after the incident and she asked Ms. King how she was coping with the situation. Ms. Taylor testified that Ms. King told her that it was a stressful situation and then said, “I think I shook him too hard.” Ms. Taylor testified that she did not tell anyone about Ms. King’s statement because she did not want to be involved. She testified that she was angry at Mr. Roosevelt and the prosecutor for encouraging her to testify and become involved in the matter but that she now realizes how important her testimony is. Finally, Ms. Taylor testified that she knows appellant’s sister and that she recognized appellant from school but that she does not know him well.

RELYING ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S UNFAILING OBEDIENCE TO THE MANDATES OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, ASS. PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, DID WHAT HE DOES BEST ... NOTHING:

{¶21} The trial court denied appellant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea without analysis, other than the judge’s statement at the sentencing hearing that he found Mr. Roosevelt and Ms. Taylor to be “singularly incredible – not credible[.]”
The State, however, failed to present any evidence to rebut appellant’s evidence that someone other than appellant reasonably could have caused the child’s injuries, so that appellant “was perhaps not guilty or had a complete defense to the charge.” See Fulk at ¶13. The trial court further expressed a “problem” with the fact that appellant denied shaking or otherwise harming the child.

 {¶25} Under the circumstances, it is clear that the witnesses’ testimony coupled with appellant’s continued denials of harming the baby are “significant enough to constitute a reasonable and legitimate basis for [a]ppellant’s desire to withdraw [his plea].” State v. Jackson (Apr. 13, 2000), 3d Dist. No. 9-99-50. Given the substance of the witnesses’ unrebutted testimony and its potential to exculpate appellant, we find the trial court’s denial of the motion to withdraw appellant’s plea to be an abuse of discretion. Appellant’s second assignment of error is sustained.

SINCE THE COURT OF APPEALS FOUND THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, HAD ABUSED HIS "DISCRETION" AND REVERSED THIS UNLAWFUL CONVICTION, IT DID NOT ADDRESS MR. WHEELAND'S OTHER APPELLATE ISSUES, WHICH WERE ALSO WELL-FOUNDED AND OF OBVIOUS MERIT:

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR I

“THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED PREJUDICIAL ERROR BY ACCEPTING APPELLANT’S PLEA WITHOUT INFORMING HIM OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS[.]”

 ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR III

“IT WAS PREJUDICIAL ERROR AND AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION FOR THE TRIAL COURT TO DENY THE APPELLANT’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW HIS GUILTY PLEA BEFORE SENTENCING AFTER THE APPELLANT DEMONSTRATED THAT HIS PLEA WAS BASED UPON MISLEADING INFORMATION ABOUT HIS POTENTIAL SENTENCE.”

 ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR IV

“THE STATE AND THE TRIAL COURT’S BREACH OF THE PLEA AGREEMENT REQUIRE REVERSAL.” 

 THE ABOVE CASE OF STATE v WHEELAND DEMONSTRATES JUST ONE MORE DAY OF BUSINESS AS USUAL IN CORRUPT COURTROOM NO. 1, OPERATED BY LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSOCIATES AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION.

LAPDOG COLLIER'S COMPLETE LACK OF INTEGRITY, AS DEMONSTRATED IN A WHOLE HOST OF CASES, INCLUDING THE WHEELAND CASE, IS PROOF POSITIVE OF THE IMPERATIVE FOR AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FOLLOWED BY INDICTMENTS OF THESE CRIMINAL OFFENDERS WHO OPERATE IN COURTROOM NO. 1.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

  

HOLMAN HIDES FURTHER EVIDENCE OF HIS CORRUPTION FROM PUBLIC VIEW

CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN has done it again!


Once again, and contrary to the law, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DINO HOLMAN has ordered the Clerk of the Medina County Kangaroo Court to remove a pleading that had been publicly displayed at the Clerk's website in an attempt, once again, to conceal further evidence of the corruption of his office from public display.


This, of course, is not the first time that HOLMAN has violated the law and the constitutional mandate requiring open, public trials. [See prior post, captioned CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, LIKE LAPDOG COLLIER, IS SHOWING HIS DESPERATION!, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/09/corrupt-county-prosecutor-dino-holman.html]


On November 28, 2011, the attorney representing the innocent defendant, whose case is being profiled at this blog, filed a motion, captioned PETITIONER'S UPDATE TO FURTHER SUPPORT HIS PENDING MOTION TO DISQUALIFY THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE.


The attorney filed the motion simply because CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN is simply trying to conceal and cover up the misconduct of his office in the matter of the Petition for Post Conviction Relief that is currently pending before a Visiting Judge.
HOLMAN FEARS THAT A HEARING ON THE MERITS OF THE PETITION WILL LEAD TO A JUDICIAL FINDING THAT ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, NOT ONLY DEPRIVED THIS DEFENDANT OF A FAIR TRIAL, BUT VIOLATED THE LAW IN SO DOING.


Initially, the Clerk of Court posted this most recently posted pleading at the website, for all the world to see.  That, however, was short-lived and the Clerk promptly removed the pleading from public view.

HERE IS WHAT HOLMAN DID NOT WANT YOU, THE PUBLIC TO SEE:


1)  THE PETITIONER'S OPPOSITION TO HOLMAN'S FALSE AND FRAUDULENT AFFIDAVIT TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE BROWN FROM HEARING THE MERITS OF THE PETITION.


2)  A SUMMARY OF THE NO FEWER THAN 20 CASES IN WHICH APPELLANTS HAVE RAISED THE ISSUE OF SALISBURY'S MISCONDUCT IN THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS.


3)  AN EMAIL FROM SALISBURY TO THIS VERY BLOG, BOASTING THAT THE CORRUPTION ENDEMIC IN MEDINA COUNTY IS OWNED BY HOLMAN, ALL THE WAY UP TO THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEALS.


SINCE HOLMAN NO CONCEALS THESE FACTS FROM PUBLIC VIEW, PICTURED BELOW IS SALISBURY'S EMAIL MESSAGE, BOTH ACKNOWLEDGING AND BOATING OF THE PUBLIC CORRUPTION IN MEDINA COUNTY:

 As readers can see, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, claims "we got your guy (the Honorable Judge Brown) out," with no little sense of glee, since Judge Brown dressed down Salisbury at a status conference.  [See prior post, captioned WHO WILL HOLMAN ATTEMPT TO BRIBE NEXT?, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/11/who-will-holman-attempt-to-bribe-next.html]


SALISBURY, the official mouthpiece for CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, then claims that "they" are going to see to it that one of the "friends" of CORRUPT ERIE COUNTY PROSECUTOR KEVIN BAXTER, HOLMAN'S BEST BUD is appointed to hear and decide the Petition, THUS FIXING THE OUTCOME.


SALISBURY THAN PROUDLY PROCLAIMS, "WE OWN THE WHOLE THING!  ALL THE WAY UP TO THE FEDERAL APPEALS COURT!"


In making this claim, SALISBURY IS OFFERING THAT FEDERAL APPEALS COURT JUDGE ALICE BATCHELDER IS IN HOLMAN'S POCKET, JUST LIKE COLLIER.


SALISBURY'S ADMISSIONS ARE CLEAR JUSTIFICATION FOR AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS AND PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG COLLIER CAUGHT AGAIN TAMPERING WITH A TRANSCRIPT?

A review and analysis of the docket of David Reed presents another interesting development, suggesting more nefarious conduct by LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.


On September 19, 2011, Mr. Reed filed a motion with LAPDOG COLLIER to vacate his unlawful sentence and to re-sentence him in accord with the law of the State of Ohio.


Pictured below is Mr. Reed's motion filed with LAPDOG COLLIER:

As the reader can plainly see, Mr. Reed alleges that LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, sentenced Mr. Reed to 12 months on Count 1 and to 5 months on Count 2, for a total of 17 months to be served.  Mr. Reed then complains that, after his sentencing hearing, someone drew LAPDOG COLLIER'S imposed sentence of 5 months on Count 2 was unlawful and that LAPDOG COLLIER unilaterally changed the docketing entry to conform with statute, thus effectively changing Mr. Reed's sentence to 11 months on Count 1 and to 6 months on Count

2, all outside the presence of Mr. Reed.

GIVEN LAPDOG COLLIER'S COMPLETE LACK OF HONESTY AND INTEGRITY, MR. REED'S CLAIM IS QUITE BELIEVABLE.

Pictured below is LAPDOG COLLIER'S denial of Mr. Reed's motion, establishing once again that LAPDOG COLLIER is unable to read with any reasonable level of comprehension:

As the reader can tell, LAPDOG COLLIER CLAIMS TO HAVE REVIEWED THE "RECORD" ("OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT") and dismissed Mr. Reed's motion on the basis that Mr. Reed was in court at the time that LAPDOG COLLIER pronounced the sentence imposed by CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DINO HOLMAN.


Two issues immediately jump out at the reader:
1)  LAPDOG COLLIER completely avoids the primary issue of unlawfully changing the structure of Mr. Reed's sentence outside the presence of Mr. Reed; and
2)  LAPDOG COLLIER claims he reviewed the "record."


LAPDOG COLLIER'S second claim, that he reviewed the record, raises another interesting questions:
1)  Did LAPDOG COLLIER really review the record?
2)  Does the actual record support Mr. Reed's contention?


MORE IMPORTANTLY, HAS LAPDOG COLLIER TAMPERED WITH, ALTERED, AND AMENDED THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT TO COMPORT WITH HIS DOCKETED ENTRY, JUST AS HE TAMPERED WITH, ALTERED, AND AMENDED THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE BEING PROFILED AT THIS BLOG?


ONLY THE OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, UNDER CONTRACT TO LAPDOG COLLIER, KNOWS THE TRUTH ABOUT THAT, AND SHE'S NOT TALKING, AT LEAST IN THE PRESENT MOMENT.


MUCH MORE TO COME ...

SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, CAUGHT RED-HANDED LYING ON THE RECORD IN ANOTHER CASE!

In a very recent post at this blog, readers were shown a petition for judicial release submitted by inmate David Reed to LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.  [See post captioned WHEN CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN COMMANDS "JUMP," LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER ASKS "HOW HIGH?"]

As previously noted in that post, LAPDOG COLLIER has yet to deny Mr. Reed's petition, as he most assuredly will at the direction of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.


A more through review of Mr. Reed's case docket, publicly displayed at the website of the Medina County Clerk of Court, demonstrates yet one more example of the CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS.


IN FACT, SALISBURY WAS CAUGHT, YET AGAIN, LYING IN COURT!  AS EXPECTED, SALISBURY CONTINUES TO PERPETUATE THE OFFICIAL MANTRA OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN: "LIE A LITTLE! LIE A LOT! WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?"


Pictured below is the pro se pleading of Mr. David Reed regarding the complete misstatement of material facts (lies) by SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, IN A SENTENCING "HEARING" BEFORE LAPDOG COLLIER:

As the reader can see from Mr. Reed's pleading, he claims that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, MADE WILLFULLY FALSE STATEMENTS BEFORE LAPDOG COLLIER IN ORDER TO CREATE A FALSE RECORD THAT MR. REED HAD BEEN CONVICTED OF RAPE IN A DELIBERATE ATTEMPT TO PREJUDICE MR. REED IN THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS.


SALISBURY MADE THIS UNLAWFUL ATTEMPT IN AN ATTEMPT TO DISCREDIT THE APPEAL WHEN MR. REED APPEALED THE DISPARATE SENTENCES THAT LAPDOG COLLIER IMPOSED ON MR. REED, AS DICTATED BY THE OFFICE OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, WHEN COMPARED WITH SENTENCES METED OUT TO WHITE DEFENDANTS IN THE SAME INVESTIGATION!


The blogger has checked the criminal records of David L. Reed in both Medina and Cuyahoga Counties and found absolutely no evidence that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, ever prosecuted Mr. Reed for the criminal offense of rape.


AS DINO HOLMAN WOULD SAY: "LIE A LITTLE! LIE A LOT! WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?" PARTICULARLY WHEN YOU HAVE A CORRUPT JUDGE LIKE LAPDOG COLLIER IN YOUR POCKET!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN SETS BAIL FOR EVERY CITIZEN WHO APPEARS BEFORE LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE COLLIER, CONTRARY TO LAW!

It should come as no surprise to anyone by now that CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR sets bail for every arrested citizen making an appearance before LAPDOG JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER IN KANGAROO COURTROOM NO. 1 AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION.


IT SHOULD ALSO COME AS NO SURPRISE THAT THE PRACTICE IS CONTRARY TO LAW, AND THE OHIO RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, NOT THAT HOLMAN AND LAPDOG COLLIER HAVE ANY REAL REGARD FOR THE LAW.


OHIO RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, found at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/LegalResources/Rules/criminal/CriminalProcedure.pdf , are reasonably straightforward and need little interpretation, at least for anyone who can read with a reasonable degree of comprehension.

RULE 46 OF THE OHIO RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE IS ENTITLED BAIL AND PROVIDES, IN PERTINENT PART, THAT A REAL JUDGE (UNLIKE LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE) IS TO CONSIDER CERTAIN FACTORS WHEN SETTING BAIL:

(C) Factors. In determining the types, amounts, and conditions of bail, THE COURT shall consider all relevant information, including but not limited to:
(1) The nature and circumstances of the crime charged, and specifically whether the defendant used or had access to a weapon;
(2) The weight of the evidence against the defendant;(3) The confirmation of the defendant’s identity;
(4) The defendant’s family ties, employment, financial resources, character, mental condition, length of residence in the community, jurisdiction of residence, record of convictions, record of appearance at court proceedings or of flight to avoid prosecution;
(5) Whether the defendant is on probation, a community control sanction, parole, post-release control, bail, or under a court protection order.

However, in Medina County, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN dictates the mount of bail, gives the order, and LAPDOG COLLIER, EVER THE DUTIFUL STOOGE AND "PAVLOV DOG" belonging to HOLMAN, passes along the bad news to the defendant.


Here is but one example, taken from the docket displayed at the website of the Medina County Clerk of Court: 

Followed by LAPDOG COLLIER'S "RULING" ON THE BAIL AMOUNT, AS ORDERED BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN:

THIS IS NOT MUCH OF A SHOCKING SURPRISE, SINCE THIS IS THE ONLY WAY THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, CAN PRESERVE HIS HOLD ON HIS LIFETIME UNCONTESTED APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH, COMPLIMENTS OF CORRUPT MEDINA DEM PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEM PARTY!


The blogger has reviewed many of the cases brought before LAPDOG COLLIER for a number of years, and has not found a single case in which LAPDOG COLLIER once defied HOLMAN and set bail in any amount different from that dictated to him by HOLMAN.


Referring back to RULE 46 OF THE OHIO RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE,  the reader will take particular note of the stated language:

"In determining the types, amounts, and conditions of bail, THE COURT shall consider all relevant information ..."

THE SIMPLE AND UNASSAILABLE FACT IS THAT THE ONLY "FACTOR" THAT LAPDOG COLLIER TAKES INTO ACCOUNT WHEN "SETTING" BAIL IS PRESERVING HIS OWN LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

WHEN CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN COMMANDS "JUMP," LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER ASKS "HOW HIGH?"

There is absolutely no doubt that CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN pulls the strings, and that LAPDOG JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER simply dances to HOLMAN'S tune.


Take, for example, the issue of Judicial Release, a procedure in law that affords an inmate to file for early release from prison confinement after serving a period of incarceration.  The inmate is required, by law, to apply for judicial release to the trial/sentencing judge.


This blogger has made an extensive review of cases heard by LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, and has not located a single case where LAPDOG COLLIER granted judicial release to any individual whom he has railroaded into prison at the behest of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND HOLMAN'S CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS.


While the law require that an inmate apply for judicial release to the trial judge, in Medina County the inmate might just as well apply to CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, since HOLMAN OPPOSES JUDICIAL RELEASE AND COMMANDS COLLIER TO DENY ANY SUCH APPLICATIONS!


It's time to review how LAPDOG COLLIER handles these applications for judicial release, at the direction of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.


Initially, inmates, with unfounded hope, submit their petitions for judicial release to LAPDOG COLLIER, not realizing that their chances of prevailing are significantly less than a snowball surviving the summer season in hell.


Once the inmate files a petition for judicial release, HOLMAN AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS FILE IDENTICAL OPPOSITIONS, WITHOUT ANY REGARD FOR THE MERITS OF THE APPLICATION.


HERE IS A TYPICAL FILING BY SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, OPPOSING JUDICIAL RELEASE:

HERE'S ANOTHER USUAL AND CUSTOMARY SALISBURY OPPOSITION TO JUDICIAL RELEASE, PRESENTED HERE FOR GOOD MEASURE:

NOTICE THE COMPLETE IDENTICAL NATURE OF THE "PLEADINGS?" IT CERTAINLY TOOK A BIT OF SHEER BRILLIANCE TO COMPOSE THIS MEANINGLESS "PLEADING," ALTHOUGH ONE CANNOT FIND ONE MISSPELLED WORD, SUGGESTING THAT SALISBURY BRUSHED UP ON HIS LATEST EDITION OF SPELLING FOR DUMMIES BEFORE HE SCRIBBLED CRAYON TO PAPER.

The above documents were randomly chosen, but identical to each and every opposition filed by SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, who has opposed each and every application filed with LAPDOG COLLIER, as far as this blogger has found.


The reader will take note of the boilerplate claims of SALISBURY that "the circumstances" dictate against early release.  However, SALISBURY, who spends most of his "workdays" trolling Craig's List at taxpayers' expense (Theft in Office), has never pled any so-called "circumstances" upon which LAPDOG COLLIER could have made an otherwise conscientious decision.  [It is noted that, in fact, LAPDOG COLLIER really does not possess a conscience.]


LAPDOG COLLIER, ever the dutiful puppet and stooge of DINO HOLMAN, does nothing more than rubber stamp SALISBURY'S fact-less oppositions and denies the inmates' petitions for judicial release.


A REVIEW OF THE DOCKET IN THE GATT AND REED CASES AT THE WEBSITE OF THE MEDINA COUNTY CLERK OF COURT AS OF THE PRESENT DATE DISCLOSES THAT LAPDOG COLLIER HAS NOT YET TAKEN THE TIME TO JOURNALIZE HIS DENIAL OF MR. GATT'S OR MR. REED'S PETITION FOR JUDICIAL RELEASE.


READERS CAN BE ASSURED THAT, AS CERTAINLY AS GOD MADE LITTLE GREEN APPLES, LAPDOG COLLIER, EVER THE DUTIFUL "PAVLOV DOG" OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, WILL DO EXACTLY AS HE'S ORDERED BY HOLMAN AND DENY BOTH PETITIONS IN DUE COURSE!


THAT'S HOW IT'S DONE IN MEDINA COUNTY, UNLESS YOU HAPPEN TO BE POLITICALLY CONNECTED, IN WHICH CASE YOU WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN CHARGED AND BROUGHT TO TRIAL IN THE FIRST INSTANCE!  [ See prior post, captioned MORE HOLMAN CORRUPTION REPORTED BY ANOTHER MEDINA COUNTY CITIZEN, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/10/more-holman-corruption-reported-by.html ]


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

A NON SEQUITOR IN MEDINA COUNTY !!!

A regular readers has forwarded a recent online news article to the blog, along with the observation that such would never be the case in the corrupt courts of Medina County.

Here's the headline:

Ohio prosecutors want law change to allow them to veto times when criminal defendants choose to have a judge decide a case

The complete article can be found at http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2011/11/ohio_prosecutors_want_law_chan.htmlhttp://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2011/11/ohio_prosecutors_want_law_chan.html .

It seems that prosecutors, outside of Medina County, may have concerns that a judge may be partial to or too lenient when deciding criminal cases.

SUCH IS CLEARLY NOT THE CASE IN MEDINA COUNTY!

CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN would love nothing better than to eliminate the jury system completely and have each and every defendant found guilty by LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.

As it is, the jury is just a mild inconvenience given the fact that LAPDOG COLLIER DOES EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO PREJUDICE A JURY AGAINST EACH AND EVERY PERSON APPEARING BEFORE HIM, THUS VIRTUALLY ASSURING HOLMAN CONVICTION AFTER CONVICTION.

Then, too, if the jury system were eliminated in Medina County, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS WOULD NOT HAVE TO WORK SO DILIGENTLY TO CONCEAL EVIDENCE.  AS IT STANDS NOW, THEY HAVE TO RELY ON LAPDOG COLLIER TO CONCEAL EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE IF THE DEFENSE ATTORNEY PRESSES HARD ON THAT ISSUE.  

THEN, TOO, LAPDOG COLLIER WOULDN'T HAVE TO SPEND SO MUCH OF HIS TIME CLEANING UP AFTER HIMSELF BY TAMPERING WITH, ALTERING, AND AMENDING ALL OF THOSE TROUBLESOME TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS!

NO ONE WHO APPEARS BEFORE LAPDOG COLLIER SHOULD EVER CONSENT TO A BENCH TRIAL.  YOU WILL HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO CHANCE THAT YOUR CASE WILL BE DECIDED FAIRLY ON THE MERITS AND ON THE COMPETENT, CREDIBLE EVIDENCE!

In the final analysis, this blogger agrees completely with the reader who sent along the news article.  One will never hear CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and his criminal assistants (an apt characterization) object to having LAPDOG COLLIER railroad an innocent defendant, without a jury.

MUCH MORE TO COME .....

"AFTER THE FIRST TEN MINUTES, I KNEW HE DIDN'T HAVE A CHANCE"

Those are the words of an anguished parent whose son was railroaded by LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.


The prosecutor in the case, of course, was none other than SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR whose ongoing pattern of egregious misconduct, is endorsed and promoted by CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.

This distraught parent remarked that the innocent son's trial was marked by LAPDOG COLLIER'S usual and customary Vaudevillian theatrics, and SALISBURY'S typical misconduct, WHICH MISCONDUCT WAS ENABLED AND FACILITATED THROUGHOUT BY LAPDOG COLLIER.


While all of this came as no surprise to the blogger, it raised an interesting issue that the blogger decided to investigate further: JUST HOW LONG HAVE LAPDOG COLLIER AND SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, TEAMED UP TO VIOLATE THE RIGHTS OF INNOCENT CITIZENS IN ORDER TO RAILROAD THEM INTO PRISON?


The answer to that question, as the blogger has discovered, is that LAPDOG COLLIER AND SALISBURY THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, HAVE BEEN ENGAGING, IN TANDEM, IN THEIR UNETHICAL AND UNLAWFUL CONDUCT FOR A LONG, LONG TIME.


WHEN LOOKING AT THE HISTORICAL RECORD OF LAPDOG COLLIER'S UNETHICAL AND UNLAWFUL CONDUCT, IT COMES AS NO SURPRISE THAT CORRUPT DEM PROSECUTOR AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEM PARTY HAVE REFUSED TO RUN A CANDIDATE OPPOSING "REPUBLICAN" LAPDOG COLLIER.


FOR CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, IT CAN'T GET ANY BETTER THAN BEING ABLE TO CONTROL THE OUTCOME OF TRIALS THAN BY HAVING A STOOGE LIKE LAPDOG COLLIER TO TAKE HIS MARCHING ORDERS DIRECTLY FROM HOLMAN AND HOLMAN'S CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS, WITHOUT FAIL.


At this juncture, it is worthy of a stroll down memory lane to discover that no fewer than 20 appellants have raised issues of SALISBURY'S PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, ALL OF WHICH HAS BEEN ENABLED AND FACILITATED BY LAPDOG COLLIER.


This fact, of course, is by no means to suggest that the MISCONDUCT OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR AND LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.  Rather, these are just the cases where the OBVIOUS MISCONDUCT WAS RAISED AS AN ISSUE ON APPEAL!


LET'S GO STROLLING:

State v Aaron Gatt, 2011-Ohio-5221, tried by Salisbury before Collier

found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2011/2011-ohio-5221.pdf 

"... the prosecutor made numerous inappropriate comments throughout the course of this trial.  In addition to the threat Mr. Gatt has assigned as error, the prosecutor repeatedly expressed his personal belief regarding the credibility of witnesses (during direct-examination of his own witness, cross-examination of the defendant, and closing argument) and frequently introduced facts not in evidence via his “questions” to various witnesses."

"This Court has previously addressed this prosecutor’s tendency to engage in “widespread improper conduct” in the courtroom.  State v. Johnson, 9th Dist. No. 09CA0054-M, 2011-Ohio-3623, at ¶62, 42-70." 

State v Brian Johnson, 2011-Ohio-3623, tried by Salisbury before Collier 

(SENTENCE VACATED/REMANDED)

found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2011/2011-ohio-3623.pdf

"The prosecutor in this case did engage in a pattern of improper conduct." 

"The prosecutor’s “cross-examination” of these women was improper, and the trial
court should not have allowed him to get away with it."

"The prosecutor was argumentative, asked improper questions, made testimonialassertions, referred to facts that were not in the record, misrepresented the evidence, and expressed his personal opinion of Mr. Johnson’s credibility." 

State v Riffle, 2010-Ohio-2812, tried by Salisbury before Collier

found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2010/2010-ohio-2812.pdf

"In his first assignment of error, Riffle contends that he was denied a fair trial due
 to prosecutorial misconduct."

"Riffle takes issue with statements made by the prosecutor during opening and closing          statements as well as on cross- examination."

"Riffle points to the prosecutor’s statements regarding the fact that S.R. had
 no reason to lie and that she was testifying against Riffle because it was the truth."
 "Riffle points to two specific instances of alleged prosecutorial misconduct that
 occurred during Riffle’s cross examination." 

State v Craig Maynard, 2009-Ohio-282, tried by Salisbury before Collierfound at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2009/2009-ohio-282.pdf

"Mr. Maynard’s second assignment of error is that the trial court incorrectly
prevented him from questioning witnesses about Mrs. B.’s and B.M.’s veracity."

State v Peter Riffle, 2008-Ohio-4155, tried by Salisbury before Collier (REVERSED) 

found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2008/2008-ohio-4155.pdf

"Mr. Johnson’s second assignment of error is that the prosecutor engaged in a pattern of improper conduct that deprived him of a fair trial."

"In his first assignment of error, Riffle asserts that his constitutional rights were
violated: ... (3) when the State referenced Riffle’s decision to cease interrogation with police during closing argument."

“Questioning regarding post-Miranda silence is improper.”  State v. Gales (Nov.22, 2000), 9th Dist. No. 00CA007541, at *4, citing Doyle, 426 U.S. at 619.  With regard to a defendant’s Fifth Amendment rights, the Supreme Court of Ohio had held that “the use of pre- arrest silence as substantive evidence of guilt is an impermissible burden upon the exercise of the Fifth Amendment privilege.”  

"If references to post-Miranda silences are permitted under the guise of establishing “background information,” it would be futile for a defendant to ever effectively invoke his right to remain silent.  We, therefore, hold that the evidence of, and the State’s references to, Riffle’s silence were improper."

"In his third assignment of error, Riffle asserts that the State engaged in misconduct
by: (1) stating in opening argument that the defense would likely use a “built-in” defense thereby implying the defense is false or illegitimate; (2) imputing that defense counsel was insincere during closing argument; (3) asking the jury during closing argument to compare S.R.’s veracity with that of their own teenage daughters; (4) giving a personal belief as to the veracity of the evidence during closing argument; and (5) implying during closing argument that the jury had a duty to convict Riffle because of S.R.’s courage in coming forward."

State v Robert Morris, 2008-Ohio-3209, tried by Salisbury before Collier  (REVERSED)

found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2008/2008-ohio-3209.pdf

“The trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offenseof criminal trespassing and in failing to properly instruct on a necessary elementof criminal trespass as required for a conviction of burglary in violation of[Defendant’s] rights to due process and fair trial under the Sixth and Fourteenth  Amendments to the Ohio and United States Constitutions.” 

 “If under any reasonable view of the evidence it is possible for the trier of fact to
find the defendant not guilty of the greater offense and guilty of the lesser offense, the instruction on the lesser included offense must be given. The evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to defendant.”

State v Anthony Divincenzo, 2006-Ohio-6330, tried by Salisbury before Collier 
found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2006/2006-ohio-6330.pdf

        "In his fifth assignment of error, Appellant argues that the trial court
         erred in permitting the State to introduce testimony that Appellant invoked his
         right to counsel during his interview with police."

State v Michael Scheck, 2006-Ohio-647, tried by Salisbury before Collier

found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2006/2006-ohio-647.pdf

"In his first assignment of error, Appellant argues that the trial court
  committed reversible error when it prohibited the defense from cross-   examining T.D. regarding her prior sexual activity with the co-defendant." 

"In his second assignment of error, Appellant contends that the State committed prosecutorial misconduct when it authorized the destruction of crucial evidence prior to trial. "   

"In Appellant’s sixth assignment of error, he contends that the State also committed prosecutorial misconduct when it referred to Appellant as a “rapist” during trial."

State v Henry Smith, 2005-Ohio-1001, tried by Salisbury before Collier 

found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2005/2005-ohio-1001.pdf

  

         "In his fourth assignment of error, Appellant has argued that he was

         not afforded a fair trial due to prosecutorial misconduct.  Specifically, Appellant

         has argued that the State made prejudicial statements during its closing arguments,

         and that such statements prevented Appellant from receiving a fair trial."

State v Bryan Nelson, 2004-Ohio-4967, tried by Salisbury before Collier

found at:  http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2004/2004-ohio-4967.pdf

"In his final assignment of error, Appellant argues that he was denied
 a fair trial due to the misconduct of the prosecutor."

State v Samuel Cutlip, 2004-Ohio-2120, tried by Salisbury before Collier

found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2004/2004-ohio-2120.pdf

"In his first assignment of error, Appellant maintains that the trial
court erred by admitting certain statements in violation of his Confrontation
Clause rights."

ALTHOUGH BUT A FEW OF THE CASES IMPLICATING THE UNCHECKED, LONGSTANDING, ONGOING PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, HAVE BEEN CITED HERE, SALISBURY'S MISCONDUCT DID NOT SIMPLY OCCUR IN A VACUUM.

LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, WAS LOOKING DOWN FROM HIS PERCH ON HIGH, COMPLETELY COMFORTABLE THAT HE WILL NEVER HAVE TO FACE A DEMOCRAT CHALLENGER IN ANY OF THOSE FUTURE RIGGED MEDINA COUNTY ELECTIONS DUE TO HIS COMPLICITY WITH CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, CHEERING ON SALISBURY FOR AN UNTOLD NUMBER OF YEARS!


THE CASES CITED HERE, AND OTHERS, ARE SINGULARLY COMPELLING EVIDENCE OF THE LONGSTANDING CORRUPTION THAT PERVADES COURTROOM NO. 1, AND PERMEATES THE COMMON CRIMINALS WHO OPERATE WITHIN IT, AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION.


THESE CASES ARE MORE UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE THAT COMPELS AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....