CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, LIKE LAPDOG COLLIER, IS SHOWING HIS DESPERATION!

Like corrupt Medina County Judge LAPDOG COLLIER, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN is getting desperate, and he's beginning to show it!


HOLMAN, like all other corrupt politicians, doesn't like being held accountable for his corrupt conduct.  In fact, until the present day, no one has ever challenged him.

In the case being profiled at this blog, the Defendant's Trial Counsel has been holding HOLMAN's feet to the fire and he does not like it one little bit.

How dare an attorney, outside of the local old boy network of attorneys, dare to question his lack of integrity, or his usual and customary unethical and unlawful practices?

So, HOLMAN, in his usual and customary fashion, violates once again the Sixth Amendment by moving to deprive this Defendant of competent legal representation.  After all, why should this defendant have any legal representation at all?  After all, the Defendant, a factually innocent person was railroaded into prison by HOLMAN, SALISBURY, AND LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER.  This, of course, is wishful thinking by HOLMAN, who deserves nothing less than his own trial in U.S. District Court for his role in denying the citizens of Medina County, as well as this Defendant, their rights  and protections accorded them by the United States Constitution.


THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, AS HOLMAN SEES IT, IS NOTHING MORE THAN A "SCRAP OF PAPER!"


Readers may wish to review a prior post at this blog, captioned LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN, SALISBURY CONSIDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION TO BE NO MORE THAN A SCRAP OF PAPER, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/08/lapdog-collier-holman-salisbury.html

Now, in yet another abomination, HOLMAN has filed a brief, no doubt objecting to a correction of the trial record which has been tampered with, altered, and changed to the intended benefit of his office and the intended benefit of his LAPDOG, MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER.


As the reader can tell from the entry below, taken directly from the website of the Medina County Clerk of Court, HOLMAN does not want the public to see that objection, since the brief cannot be viewed by the general public.


SO, HOLMAN IS NOW MOST CERTAINLY OBJECTING TO ANY CORRECTION TO THE TAMPERED TRIAL TRANSCRIPT, AND WANTS TO DEPRIVE THIS DEFENDANT OF HIS COMPETENT AND AGGRESSIVE DEFENSE COUNSEL, ALL IN HIS OWN SELF-INTEREST.


It must be said the HOLMAN actually believed that no one would catch the fact that the trial record had been tampered with, primarily because no has ever detected the tampering before. 


READERS CAN BE SURE THAT THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME A TAMPERED TRIAL TRANSCRIPT FROM MEDINA COUNTY HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE 9th DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS!

Date	Title	Notes	Document
8/29/2011	BRIEF FILED	IN RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO CORRECT TRANSCRIPTS AND MOTION TO HAVE DEFENSE COUNSEL RECUSED FROM CASE	No Document