Wednesday, September 7, 2011

9th DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS: "(COLLIER) SHOULD NOT HAVE LET (SALISBURY) GET AWAY WITH IT!"

The precise words of the 9th District Court of Appeals, chastising LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, are found in a recently decided appellate decision in the case of State v. Johnson, found at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2011/2011-ohio-3623.pdf.


Precisely, the 9th District Court of Appeal, in a decision issued on July 25, 2011, held:


The prosecutor’s “cross-examination” of these women was improper, and the trial court should not have allowed him to get away with it.
 The Court of Appeals was commenting on the conduct of both LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER and Medina County Ass. prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR!


What the Court of Appeals has not recognized is that COLLIER, A LAPDOG OF MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DEAN HOLMAN,  has been letting SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, "get away with it" for years!


Simply put, letting SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR "get away with it" is the only way that LAPDOG COLLIER, a Republican, can retain his uncontested lifetime appointment to the Medina County bench, compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and the Medina County Democrat Party.


The blogger has taken the time to read prior decisions of the 9th District Court of Appeals, found at http://www.ninth.courts.state.oh.us/.  Armed with the knowledge of the corrupt practices of LAPDOG COLLIER and the criminal assistants of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, those opinions have quite a tale to tell!


The substance of some of those prior appellate decisions, when placed in the context of the finding of the 9th District Court of Appeals in the recent Johnson Opinion, cited above, reveals a longstanding history of misconduct by LAPDOG COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.


Certain of those prior decisions of the 9th District Court of Appeals will be profiled in future segments of this blog, and compared with the Johnson Opinion, and the unethical and unlawful conduct of LAPDOG COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR in the case being profiled at this blog.

IT IS PATENTLY CLEAR THAT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN HAS NEVER TAKEN ANY ACTION TO CURB THE ABUSES AND MISCONDUCT OF HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS, DESPITE THE COMMENTS OF THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME.


ONE CAN ONLY CONCLUDE THAT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN NOT ONLY APPROVES, BUT ACTUALLY ENCOURAGES THE MISCONDUCT OF HIS ASSISTANTS SOLELY TO PRESERVE HIS TARNISHED 98% CONVICTION RATE, PRESERVED ONLY AT THE COST OF INNOCENT INDIVIDUALS WHOM HE PROSECUTES DAILY BEFORE HIS LAPDOG, JUDGE COLLIER, WHO WILL DO ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING, INCLUDING VIOLATE THE LAW, TO PRESERVE HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

1 comment:

  1. The appellate decision starts getting good at paragraph 46 on page 17, up to page 23 shows actual transcript of how many Defense objections were overruled. One sustained in over 10 objections, less than 10% valid? I don't thiiiiink so.. Starts back with more transcript at P52 on page 24 and continues to P60 that ends on page 33. the court blatantly states the misconduct in in the beginning of the paragraphs: P43 on page 16, P46 through P49, P51, P58 through P61 on page 33. P73 on page 40 sums it all up, but they let of course, him slide.

    ReplyDelete