Toward the end of attempting to conceal the illegal conduct of LAPDOG COLLIER and MEDINA ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, Newby Kern filed a brief in opposition to this innocent Defendant's Motion for Bond. Further, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT HAS INSTRUCTED THE MEDINA COUNTY CLERK OF COURT TO WITHHOLD THIS INNOCENT DEFENDANT'S REPLY BRIEF SO AS TO WITHHOLD FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND SCRUTINY THE EVIDENCE THAT SUPPORTS THE ILLEGAL AND UNETHICAL CONDUCT OF HIS OFFICE.
In his Brief in Opposition to Bond, rife with misrepresentation of material facts and unsupported claims (much as if SALISBURY THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR had significant input, even though SALISBURY in incapable of composing an intelligible legal brief), Newby Kern moved to strike from the record evidence of the longstanding extensive patter of prosecutorial misconduct by Salisbury, all of which misconduct was deliberately facilitated and enabled by LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER,
HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG."
FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF CASES PRESENTED TO THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS IN WHICH SALISBURY'S MISCONDUCT WAS RAISED AS AN ISSUE:
- "This Court has previously addressed this prosecutor’s tendency to engage in “widespread improper conduct” in the courtroom."
State v Brian Johnson, 2011-Ohio-3623, tried by Salisbury before Collier
- " The prosecutor in this case did engage in a pattern of improper conduct. "
- " The prosecutor was argumentative, asked improper questions, made testimonial assertions, referred to facts that were not in the record, misrepresented the evidence, and expressed his personal opinion of Mr. Johnson’s credibility."
- “While an attorney’s [SALISBURY'S] lack of familiarity with the Rules of Evidence may affect the question of whether misconduct was intentional or inadvertent, ignorance of the Rules of Evidence does not render questioning allowable where it would otherwise be improper.”
- "The prosecutor’s “cross-examination” of these women was improper, and the trial court [LAPDOG COLLIER] should not have allowed him to get away with it."
READERS HAVE BEEN SHOWN ONLY 10 OF THE MOST RECENT 20 CASES PRESENTED TO THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS RAISING THE PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR. THERE ARE CERTAINLY MANY, MANY MORE.
NOW, TO THE POINT OF THIS DEMONSTRATION OF THE PATTERN OF EGREGIOUS MISCONDUCT BY MEDINA ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR:
Newby Kern, in his Opposition to Bond, objects to the presently assigned judge having been presented with the full list of the 20 most recent cases raising the issues of SALISBURY'S PATTERN OF EGREGIOUS MISCONDUCT, claiming that SALISBURY'S PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT IN THE PRIOR MOST RECENT 20 CASES IS "IRRELEVANT" TO SALISBURY'S PATTERN OF EGREGIOUS PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT IN THE CASE OF THE INNOCENT CITIZEN BEING PROFILED AT THIS BLOG.
Specifically, Newby Kern has argued:
It is the position of the State that this [list of cases documenting SALISBURY'S misconduct] is entirely irrelevant to the proceedings as the Opinions of the Ninth District Court of Appeals whether a prosecutor erred in other cases is irrelevant to the determination whether a prosecutor erred (in this case)....Frankly, whether the prosecutor committed misconduct in some other case is irrelevant to whether there was misconduct in this case.Setting aside the fact that Newby Kern appears to have a problem constructing a proper sentence, his argument is based upon the faulty premise that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, SIMPLY "ERRED" WHEN HE ENGAGED IN AN EGREGIOUS PATTERN OF PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT WHEN HE JOINED TOGETHER WITH LAPDOG COLLIER TO RAILROAD AN INNOCENT CITIZEN INTO PRISON.
To believe that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, simply "erred" can only be concluded by an individual of significantly diminished mental capacity to the level of LAPDOG COLLIER.
The purpose of the list of 20 recent cases of prosecutorial misconduct by SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR is to demonstrate unequivocally that SALISBURY ENGAGED IN A DELIBERATE PATTERN OF EGREGIOUS PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, AS HE HAD DONE SO MAY TIMES BEFORE OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS.
THAT PATTERN OF EGREGIOUS PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT BY SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, HAS GONE UNCHECKED FOR MANY YEARS, PROVING THAT SUCH MISCONDUCT IS CONDONED AND PROMOTED BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.
MUCH MORE TO COME ON THIS SUBJECT ....