Monday, May 30, 2011

SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, CRIES OUT, "THE TRUTH IS JUST KILLING ME!"

UNDERSTANDABLY SO !!!

Medina County Ass. prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY a/k/a SKIPPY SLEAZEBURY (for obvious reasons), THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR,  just can't stand being exposed for what he is: just one more unethical, low-life, low-rent "attorney."


SALISBURY, who has once again defied explicit instructions from CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN to refrain from engaging this blogger, has once again sent an email message to the blog.

HERE IS A RECENT EMAIL MESSAGE FROM SALISBURY:




idc wat the guy did to u, i dont care wat ur grudge against him is.  just stop.  usually rants and ravs are a great laugh and I must admit, at first i found your posts as funny.  However like most things, you have beating this horse to death.  Find something new to be pissed about for christ sakes.  religion?  sports?  or how about ranting about your own life.  you spend so much time trying to ruin a persons life you have proven that you lack one of your own.  get a job, if you have one already get another.  My guess is that you broke the law and he did his job to punish you.  if that is the case (not that you would tell me) try being an upstanding citizen instead of bashing people.  Karma dude, believe me it is a mother fucker and all this nonsense you are spewing is old.  hang it up, you really sound like a bitter person.  thanks and I look forward to reading your next rant topic.
INTERESTING, ISN'T IT?  NOTICE THE SPELLING AND GRAMMATICAL ERRORS!

I WONDER HOW MANY FEET SALISBURY CAN FIT IN HIS MOUTH AT ONE TIME?


SALISBURY'S life is being "ruined" because his unethical and unlawful conduct is being exposed to the light of day!!!  IT MUST BE TRUE THAT THE TRUTH HURTS !


PERHAPS SALISBURY, HOLMAN, and LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER should consider all the lives THEY HAVE RUINED BY DEPRIVING CITIZENS OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND BY RAILROADING INNOCENT CITIZENS! 


As for the issue of Karma, I'm not sure what SALISBURY is talking about.  Given SALISBURY'S inability to spell the most common of words in use in the English Language, I can only speculate that SALISBURY is referring to "KARMA CORN" (Carmel Corn?) that is sold at numerous booths at the Medina County fair.


Quite frankly, I'm not sure what "KARMA CORN" has to do with the daily unethical, unlawful conduct of a PATHOLOGICAL LIAR LIKE SALISBURY.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....





Thursday, May 19, 2011

SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, FOUND TO BE LYING ON THE TRIAL RECORD AGAIN!! HE JUST CAN'T STOP LYING !!!!

Of course, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, lied throughout the proceedings with the knowing and willful intention of CONVICTING AN INNOCENT PERSON AND RAILROADING THE DEFENDANT RIGHT INTO PRISON, WITH THE FULL CONSENT AND APPROVAL OF LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER.

HERE IS BUT ONE MORE LIE BY SALISBURY, CAPTURED IN THE TRIAL RECORD, FOUND AT PAGES 145 - 146 OF THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT:

DEFENSE COUNSEL:  And then the report references some photographs we were not given.

COLLIER:  What photographs?

DEFENSE COUNSEL: The report states that Clinage took some photographs on the 27th, the day when he - -

COLLIER:  Do you have pictures?

SALISBURYNO!

DEFENSE COUNSEL:  The report - - the evidence log lists pictures, your Honor.  We were told, when we went to look at the evidence, that they were expressly told not to give us the photographs.
SALISBURY WAS TRIPPED UP IN THIS LIE BY THE REPORT OF DEPUTY CLINAGE, WHICH SALISBURY MADE EVERY EFFORT TO CONCEAL FROM THE DEFENSE COUNSEL.  FORTUNATELY, DEFENSE COUNSEL HAD OBTAINED A COPY OF THE REPORT UNDER THE FORCE OF TRIAL SUBPOENA,

THESE ARE THE PHOTOS THAT SALISBURY AND LAPDOG COLLIER DEEP-SIXED AND REFUSED TO TURN OVER TO THE DEFENSE.  THESE SAME PHOTOS, IF OFFERED TO THE JURY, WOULD HAVE UNDERCUT THE PERJURED TESTIMONY OF WILMA FLINTSTONE, PERJURED TESTIMONY THAT WAS INSPIRED AND COMPELLED BY SALISBURY!

THE CONCEALMENT OF THESE PHOTOS FROM THE DEFENSE BY SALISBURY AND LAPDOG COLLIER NOT ONLY VIOLATES THE BRADY DECISION, BUT ALSO CONSTITUTES THE CRIMINAL OFFENSE OF TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, IN VIOLATION OF OHIO STATE LAW.

You may wish to review the post captioned, "NO MORE HEAT, PLEADS SALISBURY," found at
http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/01/no-more-heat-pleads-salisbury.html


In that post, you will find that SALISBURY admits to routinely withholding exculpatory evidence and that LAPDOG COLLIER does not enforce the lawful mandates of Brady v. Maryland that requires prosecutors to turn over exculpatory (favorable) evidence!

MUCH MORE TO COME .... 








Friday, May 13, 2011

CAUGHT AGAIN! SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, CAUGHT IN YET ANOTHER LIE ON THE TRIAL RECORD!


COMPLETELY WORTHLESS AND TOTALLY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY "JUDGE" CHRISTOPHER COLLIER HAS BEEN A LAPDOG OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN FOR YEARS, CONTINUING UP TO AND INCLUDING THE PRESENT DATE.

Once again, we turn to the Ohio Rules of evidence, easily found at http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/LegalResources/Rules/ 

Ohio Rule 403(A) provides:
RULE 403. Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice, Confusion, or Undue Delay
(A) Exclusion mandatory. Although relevant, evidence is not admissible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, of confusion of the issues, or of misleading the jury.
In conformity with Ohio Rule 403(A), the law imposes upon a real judge the obligation to conduct a balancing test, on the record.  In other words, a real judge is obliged to weigh whether the prejudicial effect outweighs the probative value of any such evidence at the time that the prosecutor seeks to admit such evidence.

In the matter of the forbidden evidence, which LAPDOG "JUDGE" COLLIER permitted SALISBURY to introduce the forbidden alleged "other acts" evidence, LAPDOG COLLIER failed to conduct the requisite balancing test. Not much of a surprise there, since LAPDOG COLLIER fully intended to convict the Defendant, an innocent man,  of a crime that the Defendant  factually DID NOT COMMIT.

Next, we turn to Ohio Rule of Evidence 404(A), which provides:

RULE 404. Character Evidence not Admissible to Prove Conduct; Exceptions; Other Crimes

(A) Character evidence generally. Evidence of a person's character or a trait of character is not admissible for the purpose of proving action in conformity therewith on a particular occasion ....

Further, we also look to Ohio Rule of Evidence 404(B), which provides:

(B) Other crimes, wrongs or acts. Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.

Analyzing Rule 404(A), the prosecutor is FORBIDDEN from admitting evidence of other prior conduct, particularly prior misdemeanor arrest, solely for the purpose of suggesting “bad character” from which a jury might conclude that a Defendant likely committed the charged offense because of “bad character.”

THIS WAS THE SPECIFIC TACTIC USED BY SALISBURY, WITH THE COMPLETE CONCURRENCE OF LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, CLEARLY IN VIOLATION OF RULE 404(A) AND 404(B)..

Turning now to Rule 404(B), if a real judge has conducted a balancing test and determines that the “other acts” evidence, if not forbidden, is admissible, the prosecutor must make a contemporaneous affirmative statement, on the record, that the evidence is being admitted to show “ motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”

When LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER permitted SALISBURY to introduce the forbidden “other acts” evidence, IN VIOLATION OF OHIO RULES 404(A) AND 404(B), SALISBURY failed to make a contemporaneous statement as to the reason otherwise “justifying” the admission of the forbidden “other acts” evidence, which in this case was an unrelated misdemeanor arrest of nearly five years previous which was CLEARLY INADMISSIBLE.

Needless to say, LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER did not enforce Rule 404(B), and did not require SALISBURY to make the declaration.

However, at the close of the trial as the defective jury instructions were being finalized, DEFENSE COUNSEL INSISTED THAT SALISBURY DECLARE HIS JUSTIFICATION FOR ADMITTING THE FORBIDDEN “OTHER ACTS” EVIDENCE, AND THAT LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER INCORPORATE SALISBURY’S RATIONALE INTO THE JURY INSTRUCTIONS.

LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER turned to SALISBURY, who stated, on the record, that he introduced the forbidden “other acts” evidence TO SHOW MOTIVE!

SALISBURY, who is not particularly quick on his feet, gave the stupid response when, in fact, there is no way on God’s green earth that a five year-old unrelated misdemeanor arrest could establish MOTIVE.

At a much later date, in a sham pleading that SALISBURY, A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, filed with LAPDOG COLLIER, SALISBURY wrote:

            “In No. 2, she (Defense Counsel) complains of 404(B) evidence which was objected to and overruled by this Court at trial. It was properly admitted for the limited and permissible purpose of establishing MOTIVE AND INTENT.

You will notice how SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, lied by trying to sneak into the record that he had admitted the forbidden “other acts” evidence for the purpose of establishing not only MOTIVE (as found in the trial record) but now falsely claims, rather belatedly, that he also admitted the forbidden “other acts” evidence for the additional purpose of also establishing “INTENT.”

SALISBURY, it seems, tried to rehabilitate the fact that he was a day late and a dollar short when he offered this lie in his sham pleading!

It can certainly be said, in this and other instances in the trial record, SALISBURY adhered to the office motto of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN:

            “Lie a little, lie a lot! What’s the difference?”

MUCH MORE TO COME ….

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

JUST WHO IS EDWIN COOK?

For a long time, it has been known that Medina County assistant prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY has used numerous assumed names as he travels about the Internet, insulting as many people as he can.

HERE IS BUT ONE EXAMPLE OF SALISBURY'S HANDIWORK, DIRECTED AT THIS BLOG:




medina whinna (cunt)


Date: 2011-04-30, 11:54PM EDT
Reply to:
[Errors when replying to ads?]


you schitzo- fuck ya the fuckig medina prosecutor is responding to your fucked up ass you are a pillcase take another med who cares about spelling you fucking flake what a fucking moron you are lrt alone lowlife spic piece of shit bottom feeding tex mex transplant. you are a looser and a dilusional fecal fuck spic as all spics are fecal fucks. now I WANT MY FUCKING TACO BITCH MAKE THE FUCKER NOW!!!!!! PUNK!!!! 

Given the fact that I consider SALISBURY TO BE "INTELLECTUALLY CHALLENGED," and further given the fact that I have had work experience dealing with individuals with Intelligence Quotients less than 70, I fully realize that SALISBURY is not accountable for his actions.  DINO HOLMAN IS OBVIOUSLY OF THE SAME MIND!


However, SALISBURY seems to be particularly sensitive about revelations that he has used the assumed name of EDWIN COOK, apparently to badger and harass others on the Internet.


SALISBURY has used the email address of COOKEDWIN25@ YAHOO.COM 

Perhaps there's more?  Is it possible that SALISBURY HAS USED THE NAME OF EDWIN COOK FOR OTHER CRIMINAL PURPOSES?  Perhaps to fraudulently apply for credit, credit cards, or order merchandise under the assumed name of EDWIN COOK?

It certainly remains a puzzle.  One thing is certain, though.  SALISBURY CERTAINLY DOESN'T WANT SOMEONE TO KNOW THAT HE'S BEEN USING THE ASSUMED NAME OF EDWIN COOK.


IF YOU HAVE ANY INFORMATION ABOUT THE USE OF THE ALIAS "EDWIN COOK," 
PLEASE EMAIL THIS BLOG! 


MUCH MORE TO COME ....