Wednesday, April 27, 2011

ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, CONTINUES TO SPEW HIS RACIST RANTS ON THE TAXPAYERS' DIME

Medina County assistant prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY, A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, continues to spew his racist rants ON THE TAXPAYERS' DIME.


On April 27, 2011, during his regular "work" hours, SALISBURY, likely using Medina County equipment, sent the following email message to this blog:


"you are nothing more than some dumbass nigger!!"
Once again, you see the depth of the corruption in Medina County Government.  County Commissioners have responded to this blog, advising that SALISBURY IS DEAN HOLMAN'S PROBLEM, NOT THEIRS.

It is obvious Medina County Commissioners lack the intestinal fortitude to deal with the RACISM IN THE OFFICE OF THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR. 

LATER IN THE DAY, SALISBURY a/k/a SKIPPY SLEAZEBURY (for obvious reasons) SENT ALONG THIS LITTLE MISSIVE TO THE BLOG:
Skippy has sent you a link to a blog:
Think I can't spell, punk, well I can spell Racism, not racsim. Shut down your blog before there is a SWAT team at your door.
MIGHT YOU SUPPOSE THAT SALISBURY DOES NOT WISH THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO LEARN THAT HE IS A RAGING RACIST AND BIGOT? ALTHOUGH, IN TRUTH, IT DOESN'T SEEM TO BOTHER CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN IN THE SLIGHTEST.

IT WOULD APPEAR THAT SALISBURY, IN ATTEMPTING TO SUPPRESS THIS BLOG, IS NOW THREATENING TO SEND THE SPELLING POLICE TO THE BLOGGER'S DOOR! 

AS YOU CAN PLAINLY SEE, AFTER DENYING CITIZENS OF MEDINA COUNTY THEIR FOURTH, FIFTH, SIXTH, AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER AND CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND HIS MINIONS ARE NOW ASSAULTING THE FIRST AMENDMENT!  NOTHING NEW IN THAT REGARD! 


IT IS ONLY REASONABLE TO ASSUME THAT HE WHO HOLDS THE PURSE STRINGS CAN EXERT APPROPRIATE INFLUENCE TO MODIFY THE CONDUCT OF AN INDIVIDUAL PAID WITH MEDINA COUNTY FUNDS WHO, IN TRUTH, SHOULD BE SEEKING EMPLOYMENT ELSEWHERE BY THIS TIME!

THIS IS JUST ONE MORE EXAMPLE OF THE NEED FOR AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

Monday, April 18, 2011

MEDINA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS QUIETLY ENDORSE THE RACIST HATE SPEECH COMING FROM THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE!!

It is truly amazing that there is ABSOLUTELY NO INTEGRITY IN THE WHOLE OF MEDINA COUNTY GOVERNMENT.


If you are a regular reader of this blog, you are already familiar with the RACIST RANTS OF ASSISTANT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY.


See, for example, the post captioned, SALISBURY CONTINUES TO LIE, CLAIMS HE CAN SPELL!,
easily found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/03/salisbury-continues-to-lie-claims-he.html


SALISBURY, A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AS HAS ALREADY BEEN SHOWN, has the uncanny ability to disgrace the whole of Medina County government with impunity!


Each and every Medina County Commissioner, as well as the local heads of the Medina County Democrat and Republican parties, has been noticed as to the RACIST RANTS ORIGINATING FROM THE OFFICE OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DEAN HOLMAN.


THE SILENCE OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IS DEAFENING!!!!


Based upon the lack of response from the Medina County Commissioners, it would certainly seem apparent that these local Medina politicians HAVE FAILED TO TAKE ANY ACTION TO RESTRAIN SALISBURY FROM ARTICULATING THE APPARENT OFFICIAL POLICY OF THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS AND, IN FACT, THE WHOLE OF THE MEDINA COUNTY GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRACY!


IN SHORT, MINORITIES ARE JUST NOT WELCOME IN MEDINA COUNTY!


THE POSITION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR IS THAT MINORITY CITIZENS HAVE GOT TO BE "CONTROLLED," AT THE CONVENIENT COST OF CONVICTING AN "OCCASIONAL INNOCENT PERSON" IN ORDER TO AVOID "CHAOS" IN MEDINA COUNTY.

On Friday, April 15, 2011, RACIST SALISBURY directed this message to the blog:

You're making that place sound like a great place to live for white people. Anyone who has lived in a place with wetbacks would appreciate officials in government who embrace such qualities. Moron. 


In fact, on Saturday, April 16, 2011, SALISBURY, not to be deterred in expressing the racism endemic in the Medina County Courts, sent along this little message to the blog:

Sounds like a spic or nigger got prosecuted for something stupid in Medina and are now blaming it on the prosecutor. Sad for you, wetback. 
If all "white people" shared the same "values" (or more appropriately, the lack thereof) as SALISBURY, COLLIER, and HOLMAN, the world would be a much worse place in which to live than it is already.

HOW PATHETIC THAT LOCAL GOVERNMENT IS PERMEATED WITH INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE NO RESPECT FOR OTHER HUMAN BEINGS AND WHO LACK ANY SEMBLANCE OF MORALITY AND INTEGRITY.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

Friday, April 15, 2011

LATE BREAKING NEWS! RACIST ASSISTANT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR SALISBURY HAS SURGED AHEAD AND IS NOW, BY CONSENSUS, THE MOST CORRUPT "PUBLIC OFFICIAL" IN MEDINA COUNTY

IT IS NOW OFFICIAL!  SALISBURY HAS TAKEN THE LEAD AS THE MOST CORRUPT "PUBLIC OFFICIAL" IN MEDINA COUNTY!!!


There has been a rather recent development in the tabulation of most-read posts at this blog!

As of late, readers have expressed an intense interest in SALISBURY'S FAILURE TO SPELL ANY WORD WITH MORE THAN FOUR LETTERS AND ONE VOWEL!


Then again, many readers may have also been drawn to SALISBURY'S RACIST RANTS, WHICH HAVE APPARENTLY BEEN ENDORSED BY MEDINA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, AS WELL AS BY THAT COMPLETELY WORTHLESS AND TOTALLY CORRUPT LAPDOG, MEDINA "JUDGE" CHRISTOPHER COLLIER!


The post that has put SALISBURY at the top of the Medina County Corruption Heap is caption,
SALISBURY CONTINUES TO LIE, CLAIMS HE CAN SPELL!


The prize-winning post that has enabled SALISBURY to surge ahead of the pack of contenders can be easily found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/03/salisbury-continues-to-lie-claims-he.html

More about the tacit approval of SALISBURY'S RACIST RANTS, by the Medina County Commissioners, will be posted shortly!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

Monday, April 11, 2011

SALISBURY IS CREEPING TO THE TOP OF THE MEDINA COUNTY CORRUPTION SCALE!

Now that Spring is nearly upon us, it's time to take stock, once again, of reader favorites.

With more than 14, 000 hits at this blog, I believe that the consensus of readers is a reliable indicator of the MOST CORRUPT "PUBLIC SERVANTS" in Medina County.

Rather than to tabulate reader votes, as in the past, the TOP TEN MOST READ POSTS OF ALL TIME ARE PRESENTED HERE, in descending order.


Unlike the CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY COURTS, you, the readers have been the judges, with much more just and satisfying results.


HERE, THEN, ARE THE BLOG'S TOP TEN POSTS:


#1  judge CHRISTOPHER COLLIER THE CASE FIXER
      found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/christopher-collier-case-fix.html

#2  SALISBURY CONTINUES TO LIE, CLAIMS HE CAN SPELL!
      found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/03/salisbury-continues-to-lie-claims-he.html

#3  COLLIER RATED #1 CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY "PUBLIC OFFICIAL" IN READER     POLL!  found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/11/collier-rated-1-corrupt-medina-county.html

#4  IN MEDINA COUNTY, IT'S STILL THE SAME OLD SONG!
      found at  http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/in-medina-county-its-still-same-old.html

#5  AN INSIDERS' VIEW OF THE CHARACTER, INTEGRITY, AND MORALITY AT THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
       found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/11/insiders-view-of-character-and.html

#6  A LITTLE BIT OF THE MEDINA COUNTY POLITICAL MATH
       found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/11/little-bit-of-medina-county-political.html

#7  REMEMBER CORRUPT PROSECUTOR MIKE NIFONG FROM NORTH CAROLINA?
      found at  http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/11/remember-corrupt-prosecutor-mike-nifong.html

#8  PLANNING A MOVE TO MEDINA COUNTY? BETTER THINK TWICE!!
      found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/11/planning-move-to-medina-county-better.html

#9  A HOLMANIZED CITIZEN DRIVEN TO SUICIDE!
      found at  http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/holmanized-citizen-driven-to-suicide.html

#10 A MESSAGE TOTHIS BLOG FROM assistant county prosecutor SCOTT SLEAZEBURY!
       found at  http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/message-to-this-blog-from-medina.html

There you have it.  You, the readers, have determined the most corrupt "public officials" in Medina County.


As you can plainly see, SALISBURY is beginning to creep (an apt characterization) to the top of the Medina County Corruption Scale, right behind COMPLETELY WORTHLESS AND TOTALLY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER.


That, of course , is only natural, since COLLIER and SALISBURY, along with DINO HOLMAN, have conspired to deprive innocent Medina County citizens of their Constitutional Protections and the Rule of Law.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

Thursday, April 7, 2011

COLLIER RULES THE LAW DOES NOT APPLY IF YOU ARE MARRIED

COMPLETELY WORTHLESS AND TOTALLY CORRUPT MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER violated the rights of the Defendant from the very outset of the trial.

COLLIER, who must have been thinking of his first wife, denied the Defendant and his wife the Spousal Privilege, contrary to the Ohio Rules of Evidence, the Ohio Revised Code, and the body of prevailing case law, all in a very determined effort to prejudice the Defendant and to steer the jury to a Guilty verdict.

As the trial commenced, Medina County assistant prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY, as already shown a RACIST AND A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, called the  Defendant's wife as his very first witness.
SALISBURY'S sole purpose for calling the Defendant's wife was to introduce the legally forbidden alleged "other acts evidence," which is prohibited by the Ohio Rules of Evidence.

Firstly, the reader should know that the Defendant's wife filed two separate and distinct sworn affidavits with COLLIER, asserting her Spousal Privilege.  Further, the Defendant's wife sent a personal letter to SALISBURY, also asserting her Spousal Privilege.

As the reader might expect, following a sham "hearing" on the morning of trial, the results of which had been dictated to COLLIER by HOLMAN and SALISBURY, COLLIER, in his typical allegiance to HOLMAN, compelled the Defendant's wife to testify.


COLLIER, who will never even be considered for a position requiring him to sweep the floors in the United States Supreme Court, explained his irrational rationale for compelling the Defendant's wife to testify.  COLLIER'S ruling, and his stated rationale, will be the subject of the next post at this blog.

Suffice it to say, COLLIER should have simply stated, "The wife is compelled to testify because SALISBURY AND HOLMAN decided that she has to."


At this time, it is more than appropriate to look to the Ohio Rules of Evidence and the law, which COMPLETELY WORTHLESS AND TOTALLY CORRUPT JUDGE COLLIER simply ignored in making his idiotic ruling.


FIRST, LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT THE OHIO REVISED CODE







2945.42 Competency of witnesses.

No person is disqualified as a witness in a criminal prosecution by reason of the person’s interest in the prosecution as a party or otherwise or by reason of the person’s conviction of crime. Husband and wife are competent witnesses to testify in behalf of each other in all criminal prosecutions and to testify against each other in all actions, prosecutions, and proceedings for personal injury of either by the other, bigamy, or failure to provide for, neglect of, or cruelty to their children under eighteen years of age or their physically or mentally handicapped child under twenty-one years of age. A spouse may testify against his or her spouse in a prosecution under a provision of sections 2903.11 to 2903.132919.212919.22, or 2919.25 of the Revised Code for cruelty to, neglect of, or abandonment of such spouse, in a prosecution against his or her spouse under section2903.211 or 2911.211, of the Revised Code for the commission of the offense against the spouse who is testifying, in a prosecution under section2919.27 of the Revised Code involving a protection order issued or consent agreement approved pursuant to section 2919.26 or 3113.31 of the Revised Code for the commission of the offense against the spouse who is testifying, or in a prosecution under section 2907.02 of the Revised Code for the commission of rape or under former section 2907.12 of the Revised Code for felonious sexual penetration against such spouse in a case in which the offense can be committed against a spouse. Such interest, conviction, or relationship may be shown for the purpose of affecting the credibility of the witness. Husband or wife shall not testify concerning a communication made by one to the other, or act done by either in the presence of the other, during coverture, unless the communication was made or act done in the known presence or hearing of a third person competent to be a witness, or in case of personal injury by either the husband or wife to the other, or rape or the former offense of felonious sexual penetration in a case in which the offense can be committed against a spouse, or bigamy, or failure to provide for, or neglect or cruelty of either to their children under eighteen years of age or their physically or mentally handicapped child under twenty-one years of age, violation of a protection order or consent agreement, or neglect or abandonment of a spouse under a provision of those sections. The presence or whereabouts of the husband or wife is not an act under this section. The rule is the same if the marital relation has ceased to exist.
Effective Date: 09-03-1996

IF YOU CHOSE TO NOT PLOW THROUGH THE ABOVE-LEGALESE, HERE IS THE ESSENCE OF THE STATUTE:


One spouse may testify against another if the spouse and any dependent children are the victims of specified offenses (generally crimes of violence) for which the Defendant is being prosecuted. 
NEXT LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT THE OHIO RULES OF EVIDENCE


RULE 601. General Rule of Competency 
Every person is competent to be a witness except: 
(A) Those of unsound mind, and children under ten years of age, who appear incapable of receiving just impressions of the facts and transactions respecting which they are examined, or of relating them truly. 
(B) A spouse testifying against the other spouse charged with a crime except when either of the following applies: 
(1) a crime against the testifying spouse or a child of either spouse is charged; 
(2) the testifying spouse elects to testify. 

You will note that Ohio Rule of Evidence 601 sets out, in plain language, the same essential provisions of Section 2945.42 of the Ohio Revised Code, as above.


NOW LET'S LOOK AT THE CASE LAW

Here is but one case, among many, in the body of Ohio Appellate Law upholding the sanctity of the Spousal Privilege:


State v. Henness (1997), 79 Ohio St. 3d 53, ¶ 1 of the syllabus
         - “…the testifying spouse remains incompetent *** until she makes a deliberate choice to testify, with knowledge of her right to refuse. The trial court must take an active role in determining competency,  and must make an affirmative determination on the record that the spouse has elected to testify.”
ALL OF THIS SHOULD SEEM PRETTY CLEAR TO THE PERSON OF AVERAGE INTELLIGENCE, WHICH OF COURSE EXCLUDES COLLIER, SALISBURY, AND HOLMAN.

I AM NOT QUITE SURE WHAT PART OF THE FACT THAT A SPOUSE CANNOT BE COMPELLED TO TESTIFY AGAINST ANOTHER SPOUSE, UNLESS THE VICTIM OF A CHARGED CRIME OF VIOLENCE, THAT COLLIER JUST DOESN'T SEEM TO GET!

IF YOU AR A REGULAR READER OF THIS BLOG, YOU WILL RECALL THAT THE DEFENDANT WAS CHARGED WITH THE BURGLARY OF THE HOME OF HIS FRIEND BY SIMPLY WALKING THROUGH AN OPENED DOOR AND CALLING OUT FOR HIS WIFE AND FAMILY!  THE DEFENDANT WAS NEVER CHARGED AND PROSECUTED FOR A CRIME OF VIOLENCE DIRECTED AT HIS WIFE OR THREE YOUNG CHILDREN.

THIS, OF COURSE, IS HOW COLLIER PRESERVES HIS LIFETIME UNCONTESTED APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

Monday, April 4, 2011

SALISBURY, A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, LIES AGAIN BY DENYING HE LIED!

In the prior post at this blog, the blogger posted SALISBURY'S assurances to defense counsel that he did not intend to introduce the legally forbidden alleged "prior acts" at trial.


Also published in that same post were the disingenuous assurances of WORTHLESS AND TOTALLY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER  to Defense Counsel.

Specifically, CORRUPT JUDGE COLLIER LIED to Defense Counsel, "He's not going to use it in his case in chief, so don't worry about that."


WORTHLESS AND TOTALLY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, however, permitted SALISBURY, A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, to admit such forbidden evidence into the trial, directly in violation of the Ohio Rules of Evidence. 


In a SHAM PLEADING that he filed with CORRUPT JUDGE COLLIER on January 6, 2010, SALISBURY, lying through his teeth once again, wrote the following:


(HERE COMES ANOTHER WHOPPER!)
"ADDITIONALLY, AT NO TIME DID THE STATE EVER ASSURE OR REASSURE (DEFENSE COUNSEL) THAT IT WOULDN'T USE THE EVIDENCE."


ALL YOU NEED TO DO, TO ESTABLISH THE COMPLETE FALSITY OF THIS SALISBURY CLAIM IS TO GO TO THE POST CAPTIONED "SALISBURY, A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, LIES OPENLY ON THE TRIAL RECORD," easily found on this blog at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/03/salisbury-pathological-liar-lies-openly.html


TO BE SURE, EVEN STEVIE WONDER CAN SEE THAT THIS IS ANOTHER DIRECT LIE BY SALISBURY, WHOSE CONDUCT HAS BEEN APPROVED AND ENDORSED BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND TOTALLY WORTHLESS AND CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER!


This just one of the many ways HOLMAN, SALISBURY, AND COLLIER preserve that tarnished 98%rate of conviction of which they are surely proud!


SALISBURY set out a number of OTHER OUTRIGHT LIES IN HIS SHAM PLEADINGthat will be brought forth and produced in future posts at this blog.


WANT TO LIE AND GET AWAY WITH IT?  JUST GO TO WORK FOR CORRUPT MEDINA PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, WHOSE MOTTO IS, "LIE A LITTLE, LIE A LOT! WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?"


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

Friday, April 1, 2011

SALISBURY, A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, LEADS COLLIER AROUND BY THE NOSE!

In the very prior post at this blog, readers were exposed to the false representations of Medina County assistant prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY, a RACIST AND A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, to the Defense Counsel that he did not intend to use legally forbidden alleged "other acts" evidence in his case in chief.  Ohio Rules of Evidence 103(C), 403 and 404(A), 607, AND 609 forbid the use of such "evidence," as SALISBURY and WORTHLESS AND TOTALLY CORRUPT JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER  should know.


Further, readers were shown, directly from the TRIAL RECORD,  the disingenuous assurances of CORRUPT JUDGE COLLIER to Defense Counsel that she need not "WORRY" about SALISBURY'S use of the legally forbidden alleged "other acts" evidence.


However, WORTHLESS AND TOTALLY CORRUPT JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, with  wink and a nod, permitted SALISBURY, the PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, to introduce the legally forbidden alleged "other acts" evidence by his very first witness, contrary to Ohio Rules of Evidence 103(C), 403, 404(A), 607, and 609.


THIS IS HOW THEY PULLED IT OFF:


TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM PAGE 122 OF THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT IS SALISBURY'S RATIONALE FOR INTRODUCING THE LEGALLY FORBIDDEN ALLEGED "OTHER ACTS" EVIDENCE:


" I don't have any other witnesses to testify to this incident...."

CORRUPT JUDGE COLLIER THEN, LED AROUND BY THE NOSE BY SALISBURY, REPLIED AT PAGE 125 OF THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT: 


"I'M GOING TO LET IT IN ...."

SO COLLIER, A COMPLETELY WORTHLESS AND CORRUPT JUDGE, IN ORDER TO PRESERVE HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH COMPLIMENTS OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DEMOCRAT PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEMOCRAT PARTY, PERMITTED THE INTRODUCTION OF LEGALLY FORBIDDEN "EVIDENCE," CONTRARY TO THE OHIO RULES OF EVIDENCE (CITED ABOVE) AND A SUBSTANTIAL BODY OF PREVAILING CASE LAW, INCLUDING DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT!


THIS IS TYPICAL OF THE CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS AND A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WHY WE NEED AN INDEPENDENT CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....