Do you remember Mike Nifong, the corrupt Durham County, North Carolina Prosecutor who brought criminal charges against the entire Duke University Lacrosse Team during an election year?
Old Mike Nifong, like corrupt Medina County prosecutor DINO HOLMAN, mistakenly believed that by convicting these young men, when he knew the evidence would not support their convictions, nevertheless pressed forward, all for his own political expedience.
Eventually, true justice was done and the charges levied against these innocent defendants was dismissed by an honest judge, the likes of which you will not presently find in Medina County.
Background information on this corrupt county prosecutor can be found at tis link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Nifong . Here is an excerpt from that web page:
Orlando Sentinel and The Washington Post Writers Group columnist Kathleen Parker has coined a neologism using his name: "Now we can 'Nifong' someone when we want to trump up criminal charges based on flimsy evidence allegedly for political purposes. In short, when we want to screw up someone's life."[5] Freda Black, in her 2008 run for Durham County District Attorney, also employed this term as part of her campaign platform: "Don't get 'Nifonged' again!" [6]
In Medina, innocent citizens have been "HOLMANIZED" by the corrupt County Prosecutor DINO HOLMAN and corrupt judge CHRISTOPHER COLLIER.
All one need do is look to the 98% conviction rate in Medina County touted by HOLMAN to come to this realistic and accurate conclusion. That 98% conviction rate did not come from superlative police work, to be sure!
Mike Nifong's downfall came because he was not able to control the judges of Durham County.
DINO HOLMAN, however, does have the advantage of controlling corrupt judge CHRISTOPHER COLLIER!
If the evidence is insufficient to support a conviction, HOLMAN and his criminal assistants hide evidence favorable to the defendant and rely upon COLLIER to conceal this evidence.
HOLMAN can rely upon COLLIER to bias the jury against the defendant; to fail to enforce the Rules of Evidence and Criminal Procedure against his criminal assistants; and to rule, often contrary to the United States Constitution and the prevailing case law, in favor of his office.
Then, too, HOLMAN can rely upon COLLIER to impose the sentence upon a HOLMANIZED defendant that has been decided by HOLMAN and dictated to COLLIER.
I will guarantee that, if the Duke Lacrosse case had been brought in Medina County, Ohio, those innocent defendants would have been HOLMANIZED and they would all be in prison now, even though they were actually innocent!
Perhaps Mike Nifong should have called upon DINO HOLMAN for advice before he got in over his head. HOLMAN was in a good position to give him valuable advice.
Every day in Medina County, citizens are being HOLMANIZED. I expect that HOLMAN will be facing the same outcome as the disbarred Nifong, and likely much more.
MUCH MORE TO COME ....
Dean isn't the only corrupt persecutor out there!
ReplyDelete