I must confess that I've just received another email missive from one of our "public servants" over at the Medina County Courthouse and Railroad Station which is somewhat confusing.
This curious email message is pictured directly below:
FELONY IN THE COURTHOUSE BY MEDINA JUDGE!
show details 3:58 AM (23 hours ago) |
FELONY IN THE COURTHOUSE BY MEDINA JUDGE!
From | angus <angus666@live.com> | |
to | pers-y35gp-2081425029@craigslist.org | |
date | Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 3:58 AM | |
subject | FELONY IN THE COURTHOUSE BY MEDINA JUDGE! | |
mailed-by | craigslist.org | |
** CRAIGSLIST ADVISORY --- AVOID SCAMS BY DEALING LOCALLY
** Avoid: wiring money, cross-border deals, work-at-home
** Beware: cashier checks, money orders, escrow, shipping
** More Info: http://www.craigslist.org/about/scams.html
get a fucking life!
Now this curious message has me baffled on a number of accounts.
I ALREADY KNOW THAT CORRUPT JUDGE COLLIER HAS COMMITTED A FELONY IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE. IN FACT, I KNOW THAT HE HAS COMMITTED MANY FELONIES WHILE ACTING IN HIS CAPACITY AS A "JUDGE."
Nevertheless, this email message is still quite puzzling.
I ALREADY KNOW THAT CORRUPT JUDGE COLLIER HAS COMMITTED A FELONY IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE. IN FACT, I KNOW THAT HE HAS COMMITTED MANY FELONIES WHILE ACTING IN HIS CAPACITY AS A "JUDGE."
Nevertheless, this email message is still quite puzzling.
Firstly, you will notice that the text of the message, highlighted in blue, is not really a gramatically correct sentence. At best, it is a phrase, perhaps just a snippet of a sentence. As we all know, a sentence should always begin with a capital letter. None to be found here!
A sentence also requires a subject. No subject here!
To be a properly constructed sentence, the suspect should should have preceded the highlighted phrase with additional language like "Angus needs to..."
Now, that makes much more sense and is likely what the sender was trying to communicate.
Perhaps if "Angus" was not so preoccupied with framing innocent citizens on trumped up charges and trying to HOLMANIZE them, he might just have time to get a life!
Perhaps if "Angus" was not so preoccupied with framing innocent citizens on trumped up charges and trying to HOLMANIZE them, he might just have time to get a life!
Yet, there is more puzzlement to this message: the identity of the suspect. You see, I don't know of anyone named "Angus 666," living or dead, currently employed at the Medina County Courthouse and Railroad Station.
This matter clearly requires some deductive logic. If the suspect, who obviously wishes to remain anonymous, had used the return email address of "COLLIER 666," or "HOLMAN 666," or even "SALISBURY 666," it would have been rather easy to identify the sender.
It seems necessary to look at the lack of sentence structure and to psychoanalyze the essence of the assumed name (alias) to arrive at a reasonable conclusion.
The anonymous sender, in part, uses the assumed name of Angus, which as most know, is a breed of beef cattle. The suspect did not use the name "Holstein 666," or "Jersey 666," which are breeds of dairy cattle, from which I deduce the sender is not particularly fond of milk. I can relate to that.
No, our suspect is a meat and potatoes kind of guy and, I infer, probably most closely relates to that part of the cow nearest to and directly below the tail. That certainly suggests the suspect could be any number of individuals associated with the Medina Courts.
Delving deeper, however, one must consider the temperament of Angus cattle, which are considered to be erratic in behavior, more than a little goofy at times, and can't be trusted.
Now that sounds a lot like COLLIER to me.
So at this point we have a goofy, erratic, and unpredictable individual who most likely bears the qualities of that part of a black cow nearest to and directly beneath the tail. So far, so good.
Having now pretty well figured out the personality type of "Angus," we need to look at the structure of the incomplete sentence, or phrase, if you will.
Given the fact that "Angus" lacks the ability to properly construct a sentence, or capitalize the first word, and fails to use anything more than a two-syllable word, the first person who comes to mind is assistant Medina County prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY a/k/a SKIPPY SLEAZEBURY (for obvious reasons).
It is an established fact that SLEAZEBURY doesn't really know much about the law and never writes legal briefs or cites any case law. That can easily be verified by checking the dockets of any of his cases at the website of the Medina Clerk of Court and are always in COLLIER's courtroom.
Given the fact that SLEAZEBURY has such limited communication skills, and lacks the fundamental ability to read and write intelligibly, it seems that SLEAZEBURY is our suspect.
But, no so fast. We need to look at the significance of the number "666" that "Angus" has placed behind his name.
Now, I suppose, that there may be any number of theories of the intended meaning of "666."
I, however, choose to posit that, reasonably, the number "666" represents the number of innocent citizens framed and railroaded in Medina County so far in calendar year 2010.
Of course, HOLMAN and SLEAZEBURY both come to mind, both of whom are so proud of their tarnished 98% rate of conviction that they will do anything and everything, including violating the law, to preserve it.
Then again, COLLIER has more than a vested interest in assuring that HOLMAN preserves his tarnished 98% conviction rate. After all, it's the only way COLLIER has been able to keep his uncontested seat on the bench, without any Democrat opposition, for all these many years.
So, in the final analysis, the baffling message was went to me by SALISBURY, HOLMAN, or COLLIER.
However, "Angus 666" needs to look ahead just a little bit, since we are still in the month of November, with approximately 8% of the year yet to go.
If my math is correct, Angus should easily be able to project that, by the last day of 2010, he will have participated in framing and railroading no fewer than 727 innocent Medina County citizens.
So, "Angus," I expect to receive your next email message with the return email address of "Angus 727"!
MUCH MORE TO COME ....
This matter clearly requires some deductive logic. If the suspect, who obviously wishes to remain anonymous, had used the return email address of "COLLIER 666," or "HOLMAN 666," or even "SALISBURY 666," it would have been rather easy to identify the sender.
It seems necessary to look at the lack of sentence structure and to psychoanalyze the essence of the assumed name (alias) to arrive at a reasonable conclusion.
The anonymous sender, in part, uses the assumed name of Angus, which as most know, is a breed of beef cattle. The suspect did not use the name "Holstein 666," or "Jersey 666," which are breeds of dairy cattle, from which I deduce the sender is not particularly fond of milk. I can relate to that.
No, our suspect is a meat and potatoes kind of guy and, I infer, probably most closely relates to that part of the cow nearest to and directly below the tail. That certainly suggests the suspect could be any number of individuals associated with the Medina Courts.
Delving deeper, however, one must consider the temperament of Angus cattle, which are considered to be erratic in behavior, more than a little goofy at times, and can't be trusted.
Now that sounds a lot like COLLIER to me.
So at this point we have a goofy, erratic, and unpredictable individual who most likely bears the qualities of that part of a black cow nearest to and directly beneath the tail. So far, so good.
Having now pretty well figured out the personality type of "Angus," we need to look at the structure of the incomplete sentence, or phrase, if you will.
Given the fact that "Angus" lacks the ability to properly construct a sentence, or capitalize the first word, and fails to use anything more than a two-syllable word, the first person who comes to mind is assistant Medina County prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY a/k/a SKIPPY SLEAZEBURY (for obvious reasons).
It is an established fact that SLEAZEBURY doesn't really know much about the law and never writes legal briefs or cites any case law. That can easily be verified by checking the dockets of any of his cases at the website of the Medina Clerk of Court and are always in COLLIER's courtroom.
Given the fact that SLEAZEBURY has such limited communication skills, and lacks the fundamental ability to read and write intelligibly, it seems that SLEAZEBURY is our suspect.
But, no so fast. We need to look at the significance of the number "666" that "Angus" has placed behind his name.
Now, I suppose, that there may be any number of theories of the intended meaning of "666."
I, however, choose to posit that, reasonably, the number "666" represents the number of innocent citizens framed and railroaded in Medina County so far in calendar year 2010.
Of course, HOLMAN and SLEAZEBURY both come to mind, both of whom are so proud of their tarnished 98% rate of conviction that they will do anything and everything, including violating the law, to preserve it.
Then again, COLLIER has more than a vested interest in assuring that HOLMAN preserves his tarnished 98% conviction rate. After all, it's the only way COLLIER has been able to keep his uncontested seat on the bench, without any Democrat opposition, for all these many years.
So, in the final analysis, the baffling message was went to me by SALISBURY, HOLMAN, or COLLIER.
However, "Angus 666" needs to look ahead just a little bit, since we are still in the month of November, with approximately 8% of the year yet to go.
If my math is correct, Angus should easily be able to project that, by the last day of 2010, he will have participated in framing and railroading no fewer than 727 innocent Medina County citizens.
So, "Angus," I expect to receive your next email message with the return email address of "Angus 727"!
MUCH MORE TO COME ....
HERE'S ANOTHER UNSOLICITED COMMENT SENT BY EMAIL FROM A READER:
ReplyDelete"Your blog has really brought out the nuts in Medina County Government.
Keep it Up! Great work - Sheila"