COLLIER IS NOT JUST HOLMAN'S LAPDOG, BUT HIS "PAVLOV DOG" AS WELL

Just what won't CORRUPT LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER do to preserve his hold on his lifetime, uncontested seat on the Medina County bench, compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DEAN HOLMAN and the Medina County Democrat party?


The answer to that question, of course, is just about anything, INCLUDING TAMPERING WITH, ALTERING, AND AMENDING A TRIAL RECORD, OR SO IT SEEMS!


Most, if not all readers are likely familiar with Pavlov's dogs.  Just to refresh, Pavlov was a social scientist who was testing the theory of stimulus and response.  Pavlov rand a bell, and thereafter fed his dogs, who were test subjects in his experiment.  After repeating this series of events, Pavlov rang the same bell, but withheld food, finding that the dogs began to salivate at the sound of the bell, even though food had been withheld.  This experiment validated Pavlov's theory that stimulus produces a predictable response.

If Pavlov were alive today, he would not have to use canines for his experiments.  He could easily confirm his theory by attending a kangaroo "trial" conducted by LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, TOWN WHORE, AND A "PAVLOV DOG" TRAINED BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.


Specifically, HOLMAN has trained LAPDOG COLLIER TO DENY EACH AND EVERY PROPERLY PLACED OBJECTION LODGE BY DEFENSE ATTORNEYS.


EVERY TIME DEFENSE COUNSEL VOICES "OBJECTION" AT TRIAL, LAPDOG COLLIER'S PAVLOVIAN RESPONSE IS "OVERRULED!"


Perhaps it is a worthwhile endeavor to examine the trial transcript in the case of the innocent citizen railroaded by LAPDOG COLLIER, at least the portion of the trial transcript that remains after it had been edited, tampered with, altered. and amended by the boys over at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station.


A review of the CORRUPTED "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT discloses that Defense Counsel voiced "OBJECTION" on no fewer than 40 occasions at trial, AND LAPDOG COLLIER OVERRULED (DENIED) EACH AND EVERY OF DEFENSE COUNSEL'S 40 OBJECTIONS.


Just so that the reader understands the implication of this fact, Defense Counsel raised each and every objection that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, VIOLATED THE OHIO RULES OF EVIDENCE. 


SO THIS FACT ALONE PROVES UNEQUIVOCALLY THAT LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG" COMPLETELY DISREGARDED THE RULES OF EVIDENCE AT TRIAL!!!


This, however, is but one side of the coin.

Whenever Defense Counsel asked a question that went to the truth of a matter, SALISBURY OBJECTED  ON THE BASIS THAT THE TRUTH WAS KILLING HIM.


Of course, LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG,"  certainly could not let the truth enter into the trial.  AFTER ALL, THE ONLY WAY THAT LAPDOG COLLIER PRESERVES HIS LIFETIME UNCONTESTED APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH IS TO ASSURE THAT HOLMAN AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS "WIN," NO MATTER HOW BADLY HE VIOLATES THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE DEFENDANT.


So, examining the other side of this coin, LAPDOG COLLIER SUSTAINED (GRANTED) NO FEWER THAN 52 OBJECTIONS LODGED BY SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AT TRIAL!


To give credit where credit is due, however, it is noted that LAPDOG COLLIER DID SUSTAIN (GRANT) 2 OBJECTIONS RAISED BY DEFENSE COUNSEL AT TRIAL!


In summation LAPDOG COLLIER OVERRULED NO FEWER THAN 40 DEFENSE OBJECTIONS AT TRIAL, BUT IN THE SPIRIT MAGNANIMITY, GRANTED THE DEFENSE ALL OF TWO OBJECTIONS!


It is certainly worth reviewing some of LAPDOG COLLIER'S "rulings" in order to evaluate the manner in which he mediates a trial, calling to mind LAPDOG COLLIER'S claim that it is his responsibility, as a "judge," to assure that trials are conducted fairly.  [See prior post captioned LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, PANDERS TO THE PUBLIC found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/07/lapdog-medina-judge-collier-village_25.html ]

COMPARE AND CONTRAST THE FOLLOWING "RULINGS" FROM LAPDOG COLLIER:


At pages 803 & 804, the defense investigator was testifying in the context of his law enforcement experience, prior to his retirement as a Federal law enforcement officer:

Defense Question:  Now when you would go on a raid or on an arrest, did you ever wear your holster across your shoulder, diagonally across your shoulder?

Witness:  No.  Not like an ammunition bandoleer, no.
Defense Question:  And why is that?
Witness:  Because you wanted to have the - - your firearm at the ready.  And, in fact - -
Salisbury:  Objection.
Witness:  - - particularly --
LAPDOG COLLIER:  I'm going to let him testify about this briefly.  Please go ahead, sir.
Witness:  Particularly on drug raids - - 
Salisbury:  Objection.
LAPDOG COLLIER:  I'm going to sustain the objection as to "DRUG RAID."  WE'RE NOT DEALING WITH A DRUG RAID HERE TODAY!

While LAPDOG COLLIER refused to permit innocuous testimony about the law enforcement experience of the defense investigator, TAKE A LOOK AT THE PREJUDICIAL QUESTIONS/REMARKS IMPERMISSIBLY ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE BY SALISBURY WITH THE FULL APPROVAL OF LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE:


While cross-examining a defense witness, at Page 562 of the corrupted trial transcript, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR was "examining" the witness about one of the Defendants' prior associates:

Salisbury Question:  (The associate) He's a drug addict.
Defense Counsel:  Objection.
LAPDOG COLLIER:  OVERRULED.

Now, let's take a look at a similar comment in SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR'S closing "argument," found at Page 1039 of the corrupted transcript:

Salisbury: ... he's (Defendant) hanging around a bunch of DRUG ADDICTS.
Defense Counsel:  Objection.
LAPDOG COLLIER:  OVERRULED.

Firstly there was no testimony, other than the impermissible testimony of SALISBURY, WHO HAS ALREADY BEEN SHOWN TO BE A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, that the defendant ever associated with a "drug addict" or a "bunch of drug addicts."

Secondly, it his highly prejudicial, and impermissible, to interject the subject of drugs into a case where drug offenses have not been charged.

AS YOU CAN SEE. LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, TOWN WHORE, AND HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG" WAS TICKLED PINK WHEN HE PERMITTED SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, TO PREJUDICE THIS DEFENDANT BY IMPERMISSIBLY INJECTING DRUGS INTO THIS CASE, WHICH WAS NOT ABOUT DRUGS AT ALL.


THIS IS PRECISELY WHY THE ENDS OF JUSTICE WILL ONLY BE SERVED BY AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....