LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT & TOWN WHORE, PANDERS TO THE PUBLIC

The blogger came across his rather amusing web page expressing the limited views of LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT & TOWN WHORE:
http://medlawlib.org/judgecollier/about_court.htm

This is rather an interesting read and validates the very real proposition the LAPDOG COLLIER is indeed the VILLAGE IDIOT & TOWN WHORE!

Here is but one excerpt from LAPDOG COLLIER'S self-serving explanation of his role as a judge:

"Our system of justice ensures that anyone can come into a court of law and have his or her dispute heard and resolved by a jury comprised of Medina County citizens. The trial judge makes sure that the rules governing a trial are followed and that the proceeding is fair."

LAPDOG COLLIER is obviously referring to the American system of justice, generally, and is clearly not speaking of the reality of the Medina County Courts, where citizens are deprived of their constitutional protections and the Rule of Law.


Actually, "the trial judge (SHOULD) make sure that the rules governing a trial are followed...."
One of LAPDOG COLLIER'S many failings is that he has refused to follow the Ohio Rules of Evidence and Criminal Procedure in the very trial being profiled here at the blog.


The reader may wish to review a prior post at this blog, addressing the very manner in which LAPDOG COLLIER enforces "the rules governing a trial" at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/collier-philosophy-all-those-pesky.html


Here are a few, but not all, of the Rules that LAPDOG COLLIER violated at "trial":

Criminal Procedure Rule   1 : Scope of Rules: Applicability, etc.

Criminal Procedure Rule   3 : Complaint

Criminal Procedure Rule   4 : Warrant or Summons; Arrest

Criminal Procedure Rule   6 : Grand Jury

Criminal Procedure Rule   7 : The Indictment and the Information

Criminal Procedure Rule 12 :  Pleadings and Motions Before Trial

Criminal Procedure Rule 16 :  Discovery and Inspection

Criminal Procedure Rule 29 : Motion for Acquittal

Criminal Procedure Rule 30 : Instructions

Criminal Procedure Rule 31 : Verdict

Criminal Procedure Rule 33 : New Trial

Criminal Procedure Rule 46 : Bail

Evidence Rule 101  : Scope of Rules; Applicability, etc.

Evidence Rule 103  : Rulings on Evidence

Evidence Rule 401  : Relevant Evidence

Evidence Rule 402  : Relevant Evidence Generally Admissible, etc.

Evidence Rule 403  : Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice….

Evidence Rule 404  : Character Evidence not Admissible to Prove Conduct, etc.

Evidence Rule 501  : Privileges: General Rule

Evidence Rule 601  : General Rule of Competency (of witnesses)

Evidence Rule 601(B) : Spouse Testifying

Evidence Rule 602  : Lack of Personal Knowledge

Evidence Rule 605  : Competency of Judge as Witness

Evidence Rule 607  : Impeachment

Evidence Rule 609  : Impeachment by Evidence of Conviction of Crime

Evidence Rule 611  : Mode and Order of Interrogation and Presentation

Evidence Rule 615  : Separation and Exclusion of Witnesses

Evidence Rule 616  : Methods of Impeachment

Evidence Rule 704  : Opinion on Ultimate Issue

         Further, COLLIER violated the following provisions of the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct:

Canon 1:

         Rule 1.1      Compliance with the law

         Rule 1.2      Promoting Confidence in the Judiciary

Canon 2:

         Rule 2.2      Impartiality and Fairness

         Rule 2.3 (A), (B), C)  Bias, Prejudice, and Harassment

         Rule 2.4 (B), (C)  External Influences on Judicial Conduct

         Rule 2.5 (A) Competence, Diligence, and Cooperation

         Rule 2.6 (A) Ensuring the Right to be Heard

         Rule 2.8 (A), (B)  Decorum, Demeanor, and Communication with Jurors

         Rule 2.9 (A), (B)  Ex Parte Contacts

         Rule 2.10 (B)  Judicial Statements on Pending Cases

         Rule 2.15 (B)  Responding to Lawyer Misconduct

There is no question the LAPDOG COLLIER FAILED TO ENFORCE THE RULES IN THE TRIAL PROFILED HERE AT THE BLOG.

When LAPDOG COLLIER professes that he  has the responsibility to ensure that the "proceeding is fair," he's obviously referring to the MEDINA COUNTY FAIR, since a "trial" before LAPDOG COLLIER most closely resembles a CIRCUS SIDESHOW.


THESE ARE A FEW MORE REASONS THAT MEDINA COUNTY NEEDS AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF ITS COURTS CONDUCTED BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....