SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, persisted in misstating the state of the law to the very end. LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, obviously did not object to SALISBURY'S repeated misstatements of the law, EITHER OUT OF IGNORANCE, CORRUPTION, OR MORE LIKELY, BOTH!
FOLLOWING IS JUST ONE MORE TYPICAL MISSTATEMENT OF THE LAW BY SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, IN HIS ONE AND ONLY SHAM BRIEF.
SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, WROTE THE FOLLOWING IN HIS POST-TRIAL BRIEF:
"Number 5 refers to spousal privilege. This indicates a total misunderstanding of the law. There is no absolute privilege of a spouse not to testify as Defense Counsel falsely believes. The Court heard the motion and properly decided Defendant's wife had to testify."
Typically, it was actually SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, and LAPDOG JUDGE
COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, who had the “total misunderstanding” of the law. Evidence Rule 601(B) provides that a witness is not competent to testify against their spouse unless either (1) the crime charged was committed against the testifying spouse or their child; or (2) the testifying spouse elects to testify. State v. Brown, 115 Ohio St.3d 55, 65-68 (2007); State v. Adamson, 72 Ohio St.3d 431, 433-35 (1995). Neither situation applied here.
Even following the unlawful conviction of this Defendant, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, persisted in intentionally misrepresenting the state of the law. NOT MUCH OF A SURPRISE, REALLY, GIVEN SALISBURY'S COMPLETE LACK OF INTEGRITY AND ETHICS.
MUCH MORE TO COME
No comments:
Post a Comment