A TYPICAL CASE OF HOLMAN HIDING THE EVIDENCE!

Unless you might imagine that the concealment of favorable evidence from the defense is a recent phenomenon, you may wish to look to the tragic 1997 case of Audrey Iacona and the death of her premature baby boy.  
Following is a quote from an online article about those criminal proceedings:
``Since February 23, 1998, when she filed her motion for a new trial,'' Holman writes, ``(Iacona) has advanced an elaborate conspiracy theory which alleges that the Medina County prosecutor and his assistant prosecutors were so intent on convicting her at trial that -- with the full cooperation of the Cuyahoga County coroner and her deputy coroners, the Summit County medical examiner, the Medina County coroner, Dr. (Mark) Collin and Dr. (Paul) Gatewood -- they deliberately withheld or concealed the . . . blood culture report of Baby Boy Iacona from the defense.'
You can read the full account of this event at http://www.angelfire.com/mt/bevspage/page24.html
Interestingly, and typical of HOLMAN's character, he tries to excuse his misconduct and spread the blame, as you will note in the text quoted from his brief (above).  As a matter of law, it is the legal obligation of the prosecutor to disclose favorable evidence to the defendant.  Coroners and medical examiners have specific roles that do not include providing discovery to an accused. 
THE LEGAL OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE DISCOVERY TO THE ACCUSED ATTACHES TO THE PROSECUTOR, AND TO THE PROSECUTOR ALONE.
Policies and practices have not changed in HOLMAN's office since the trial of Audrey Iacona.  HOLMAN's criminal assistants continue to hide favorable evidence from defendants, aided and abetted by COLLIER, as you will further learn at this blog.
Personally, I have little doubt that the Sheriff's Office conducted an illegal search of the Iacona residence.  Obtaining a proper search warrant is so much work, and besides the concept of probable cause and adherence to the FOURTH AMENDMENT is well beyond the level of their comprehension and their level of "expertise."
Then again, why should sheriff's deputies worry about carrying out their duties in compliance with the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution?  The Medina County courts have been ignoring that Amendment for years, as has already been shown.
Moreover, I have absolutely no doubt that HOLMAN and his criminal assistants were so intent on convicting Ms. Iacona that they hid the evidence from Audrey Iocona's  attorneys.  It's how they do what they do, down to the present day.
HOLMAN IS SO INTENT ON PRESERVING HIS TARNISHED 98% RATE OF CONVICTION, HE IS WILLING TO DO ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING TO CONVICT A DEFENDANT, INCLUDING HIDING EVIDENCE AND ENDORSING THE UNETHICAL AND UNLAWFUL CONDUCT OF HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS.
Just ask Audrey Iacona's attorneys!
MOREOVER, I'VE BEEN THERE AND SEEN THAT, FIRSTHAND!
However, and not surprisingly, HOLMAN and SALISBURY have added a new wrinkle.  They now rely on corrupt judge CHRISTOPHER COLLIER to aid them in their unlawful concealment of evdidence favorable to the defendant.  
I'VE BEEN THERE AND SEEN THAT, TOO!
In the eyes of the REAL LAW, outside Medina County, that makes COLLIER a criminal accomplice.
YOU CAN BE SURE THAT IF HOLMAN AND SALISBURY MANUFACTURE "EVIDENCE," AS SHOWN TWO DAYS AGO AT THIS BLOG, YOU CAN REST ASSURED THAT THEY HIDE FAVORABLE EVIDENCE FROM A DEFENDANT, AIDED AND ABETTED BY TOTALLY CORRUPT MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER!
The specific offense for Aiding and Abetting a criminal offense, otherwise known as COMPLICITY, can be found at Section 2923.03 of the Ohio Revised Code.
Just more evidence that Medina County needs a criminal investigation conducted by the United States Department of Justice.
MUCH MORE TO COME ....