LAPDOG COLLIER & THE OTHERS AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION SUDDENLY FIND THE HOLDING OF THE UNITED STATES SUPEME COURT PERSUASIVE, LEADING THEM TO TAMPER WITH AND ALTER THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT!

It is  more than interesting that LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, completely ignored the holdings of the United States Supreme Court in the case being profiled at this blog. LAPDOG COLLIER completely ignored the prevailing decisions of the Supreme Court, such holdings which are the law of the land and control the proper rulings at trial.  LAPDOG COLLIER DID SO, OF COURSE, WITH THE SPECIFIC INTENTION TO DELIBERATELY DEPRIVE THIS DEFENDANT OF A FAIR TRIAL.


LAPDOG COLLIER SUCCEEDED IN THAT MISSION, OF COURSE.  THAT IS THE ONLY WAY THAT LAPDOG COLLIER HAS BEEN ABLE TO KEEP HIS FIRM GRIP ON HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, COMPLIMENTS OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEMOCRAT PARTY.


However, once LAPDOG COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, had accomplished their unlawful objective, they next had to conceal their unethical and unlawful conduct from the 9th District Court of Appeals.


LAPDOG COLLIER NOW HAD TO TURN TO THE DEFENDANT'S BRIEFS AND SUDDENLY NOW REALIZED THAT HE WOULD UNDOUBTEDLY BE OVERTURNED ON APPEAL SINCE, AT A MINIMUM, HE VIOLATED THE HOLDING OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF DAVIS v ALASKA, DECIDED IN 1974. 


THE REAL VALUE OF THE DEFENDANT'S BRIEF TO LAPDOG COLLIER, WHICH HE COMPLETELY IGNORED AT TRIAL, WAS TO POINT OUT THE BASIS UPON WHICH THE CONVICTION WOULD BE OVERTURNED, WITHOUT QUESTION!


Following this Defendant's UNLAWFUL CONVICTION, LAPDOG COLLIER held a "hearing" to purportedly "consider" this Defendant's post-trial motions on December 18, 2009.  Of course, given the fact that CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN HAS BOUGHT AND PAID FOR LAPDOG COLLIER WITH AN UNCONTESTED LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT AS LONG AS LAPDOG COLLIER IS TOTALLY OBEDIENT, the purported "hearing" was no more than an exercise in futility by this Defendant, since LAPDOG COLLIER HAD NO INCLINATION TO FAIRLY "HEAR" ANYTHING AT ALL.


In fact, LAPDOG COLLIER, in usual and customary fashion, did not permit Defense Counsel to argue this Defendant's position.  All that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, did at this purported "hearing" was to launch into more of his unsupported and unethical attacks upon Defense Counsel.

On December 17, 2009, the day prior to the dated of the sham "hearing," Defense counsel filed a brief captioned AUTHORITIES AND EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ACQUITTAL; MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL; MOTION FOR ARREST OF JUDGMENT; MOTION TO SUSPEND EXECUTION OF SENTENCE; AND MOTION FOR BAIL PENDING APPEAL , which can be found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=77.


At Page 33 of the Additional Authorities brief, linked immediately above, Defense Counsel provided the following sub-heading:

THE COURT LIMITED DEFENDANT'S CROSS-EXAMINATION OF THE STATE'S WITNESSES, THUS DEPRIVING DEFENDANT OF RIGHTS ACCORDED TO HIM BY THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

Under this subheading, Defense Counsel cited to a number of holdings of the United States Supreme Court, ALL OF WHICH LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE COMPLETELY IGNORED AT THE TRIAL OF THIS DEFENDANT.


Defense Counsel cited to Davis v. Alaska, among other similar cases, which powerfully establishes the rights of this Defendant to properly and fully cross-examine the State's witnesses, and the fatal result to the State's case where this Defendant was deprived of that right.

At Page 37 of the Additional Authorities brief, Defense Counsel cited directly to and quoted precisely the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 316 (1974):

...it seems clear to us that any such inquiry, effective defense counsel should have been permitted to expose to the jury facts, from which the jury, as sole triers of fact and credibility, could appropriately draw inferences relating to the reliability of the witness.  Petitioner was thus denied the right of effective cross-examination which "would be CONSTITUTIONAL ERROR OF THE FIRST MAGNITUDE and no amount of showing of want of prejudice would cure it."

To rephrase, the United States Supreme Court has held that in any case, such as the case being profiled here at this blog, where this Defendant was unconscionably denied his right of effective cross-examination, REVERSAL OF THE CONVICTION IS AUTOMATIC, since the violation of his constitutional rights was so EGREGIOUS.

EVEN THOUGH LAPDOG COLLIER SO DENIED THIS DEFENDANT HIS RIGHT TO CROSS-EXAMINATION AT TRIAL, HE WAS SUFFICIENTLY INTELLIGENT TO KNOW THAT THIS DEFENDANT IS ENTITLED TO AUTOMATIC REVERSAL OF HIS CONVICTION.


This holding of the United States Supreme Court certainly posed a dilemma to LAPDOG COLLIER.  Even though LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, had no problem IGNORING THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, HE LIKELY COULD NOT EXPECT THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS TO DO SO.


What, pray tell, to do?

LAPDOG COLLIER, and his handlers at the corrupt Medina County Prosecutor's Office, came up with what they thought was a SIMPLY BRILLIANT IDEA.


"LET'S JUST CHANGE THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT," they thought.  "AFTER ALL," they reasoned, "LAPDOG COLLIER APPOINTED A DIFFERENT ATTORNEY FOR THE APPEAL. THE TRIAL COUNSEL AND HER INVESTIGATOR WILL NEVER READ THE TRANSCRIPT.  THEY'LL NEVER EVEN KNOW."


Thereupon, the COMMON CRIMINALS WHO OPERATE THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTICE SYSTEM" REMOVED FROM THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT THE LINES OF QUESTIONING POSED BY THE DEFENSE COUNSEL TO THE STATE'S WITNESSES DURING CROSS-EXAMINATION, AND THE CORRESPONDING DENIALS OF LAPDOG COLLIER, PREVENTING DEFENSE COUNSEL FROM PURSUING PROPER CROSS-EXAMINATION OF THE STATE'S WITNESSES.


"PROBLEM SOLVED," thought these COMMON CRIMINALS OPERATING THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION.


The one MAJOR FLAW in the thinking of THESE COMMON CRIMINALS OVER AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION WAS EXPECTING DEFENSE COUNSEL AND HER INVESTIGATOR WERE AS LAZY AND INCOMPETENT AS THEY ARE.


THE COMMON CRIMINALS OVER IN COURTROOM NO. 1 AT THE MEDINA COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION WERE COMPLETELY WRONG IN THAT REGARD.


DEFENSE COUNSEL AND HER INVESTIGATOR READ THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT OF THE TRIAL AND FOUND WHERE THE TRANSCRIPT HAD BEEN "SANITIZED" IN AN UNLAWFUL ATTEMPT TO DEPRIVE THIS DEFENDANT OF A FAIR HEARING ON APPEAL.


THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST GLARING REASONS THAT THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTICE SYSTEM" NEEDS A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, TO BE FOLLOWED BY THE INDICTMENTS, TRIALS, AND CONVICTIONS IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THESE COMMON CRIMINALS OVER IN COURTROOM NO. 1 AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION!


MUCH, MUCH MORE TO COME ....