THE PLOT THICKENS AS LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THAT REALLY STUPID CRIMINAL, VIOLATES THE LAW...AGAIN!

In the prior post at this blog, readers were shown how LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THAT STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, impeded efforts by the defense to obtain the EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE that ASS PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY DELIBERATELY WITHHELD FROM THIS INNOCENT MAN, WHO LAPDOG COLLIER RAILROADED INTO PRISON.


LAPDOG COLLIER, of course, railroaded this innocent citizen, as he's railroaded countless other citizens, motivated only by his desire to preserve his uncontested lifetime political appointment to the Medina County bench, compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and the Medina County Dem Party.


As readers may recall from the prior post, LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, REFUSED TO COMPEL SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, TO TURN OVER THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, INCLUDING AN EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPED INTERVIEW OF THIS INNOCENT DEFENDANT'S FRIEND OF 20 YEARS, WHO TOLD KEYSTONE SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES THAT THIS INNOCENT DEFENDANT HAD NOT BURGLARIZED HIS HOME AND THAT HE DID NOT WISH TO PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES.


THE PLOT, HOWEVER, THICKENS AND DEMONSTRATES THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, VIOLATED THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OHIO AT TRIAL, SPECIFICALLY TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, A FELONY OFFENSE OF THE THIRD DEGREE!


THE SUBJECT ADDRESSED BELOW CONCERNS THE EXCULPATORY  AUDIO TAPE:


During one session of the four-part suppression hearing, defense counsel requested access to the exculpatory audio tape.  At Page 143 of the tainted transcript of the suppression hearing, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, turned over the exculpatory audio tape to LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER.


Pictured below is page 143 from the tainted transcript of the suppression hearing:

Readers will take note that, at Lines 14-15, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR states to LAPDOG COLLIER, "I'M GIVING YOU THE TAPE. HERE'S THE TAPE."


We now have LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THAT STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, in possession of the exculpatory audio tape!


Time marches on, but LAPDOG COLLIER has not made the exculpatory audio tape available to the defense.


On November 9, 2009, the morning of the first day of trial, defense counsel was discussing preliminary legal matter with LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, during a discussion of motions in limine.


During those preliminary discussions, before the jury is brought in to hear the testimony, defense counsel once again brought up the matter of the exculpatory evidence, including the exculpatory audio tape, in LAPDOG COLLIER'S POSSESSION.


A Page 14 of the tainted "official" transcript of the motions in limine, defense counsel once again raised the issue of the exculpatory audio tape, and requested LAPDOG COLLIER to conduct an in camera (in chambers) review of the contents of the exculpatory audio tape.  LAPDOG COLLIER, ever the puppet of HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, stated to defense counsel, as if he meant it, "I'll do that prior to cross (examination)."


Then, Ass Prosecutor SALISBURY stated to LAPDOG COLLIER, at Lines 14-15, "I have given that tape to you, Judge."


A copy of Page 14 from the tainted "official" transcript of the motions in limine is pictured below:

An extremely important comment from LAPDOG COLLIER is to be found at Lines 20-24, where the CORRUPT JUDGE says:

"I'll listen to Mr. Leighton's (audio-taped interview) tonight or tomorrow prior to any examination, and I'll give you an opportunity to - - then I'll seal it and give it to the court reporter - -"

NEEDLESS TO SAY, LAPDOG COLLIER NEVER MADE THE EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPE AVAILABLE TO THE DEFENSE AT TRIAL, OR AT ANY OTHER TIME!

Once again, we turn to the tainted "official" transcript of the proceedings, knowingly filed by MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY. 


Pictured below is Page 4 of the tainted "official" transcript, which identifies all of ASS SALISBURY'S PURPORTED EVIDENCE:

Looking at SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR'S marked evidence:


Item #1 - White evidence box that contained the .22 caliber single action western-style revolver,   seized UNLOADED from this innocent defendant when unlawfully arrested by the KEYSTONE COPS from the Medina County sheriff's office; one western-style gun belt and holster; and one pocket knife.


Item #2 - Bullets : .22 caliber rounds taken from the western-style gun belt.


Item #3 - Cassette tape of the recording of the 9-1-1 tape, in which ASS SALISBURY'S "key witness stated that she never saw this innocent defendant during the entirety of the purported incident, that was actually no incident at all.


FROM PAGE 4, SHOWN ABOVE, IT CAN BE CONCLUDED THAT:


1)  LAPDOG COLLIER NEVER PLACED THE EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPE IN A SEALED ENVELOPE;


2)  LAPDOG COLLIER NEVER TURNED THE EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPE OVER TO THE COURT REPORTER; AND


3)  LAPDOG COLLIER NOT ONLY WITHHELD THE EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPE FROM THE DEFENSE, BUT THAT HE WITHHELD IT FROM THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS SO AS TO CONCEAL FROM THE NINTH DISTRICT, THAT THE AUDIO TAPE WAS , INDEED, EXCULPATORY, AND THAT LAPDOG COLLIER UNLAWFULLY WITHHELD THE EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPE FROM THE DEFENSE OF THIS INNOCENT MAN.


THIS IS MORE PROOF POSITIVE THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, A REALLY STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, VIOLATED THE LAW, SPECIFICALLY TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, A FELONY OF THE THIRD DEGREE, WHEN HE CONCEALED THIS EVIDENCE.


LAPDOG COLLIER HAS PROVEN, ONCE AGAIN, THAT HE REALLY IS A STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL WHO DESERVES NOTHING LESS THAN MANY YEARS BEHIND PRISON BARS FOR HIS CRIMES!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

MORE PROOF OF THE CRIMINAL CONDUCT OF LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THAT STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL

One of the serious appellate and criminal issues arising from the corrupted trial of this innocent man who was railroaded into prison by LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, IS THE FACT THAT ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR AND LAPDOG COLLIER BOTH DELIBERATELY WITHHELD AND CONCEALED EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENDANT, FROM THE DEFENSE COUNSEL.


Defense counsel requested the May, 29, 2009, exculpatory audio-taped interview of the purported victim, this innocent defendant's friend of more than 20 years.  In his May 29 interview with sheriff's deputies DOUGLAS CLINAGE and FRANK TELATKO, the purported victim told these Keystone Deputies that this innocent citizen HAD NOT BURGLARIZED HIS HOME AND THAT HE DID NOT WANT TO PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES.


Defense Counsel's Discovery Request can be found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=14


Needless to say, those statements are favorable to the defendant, and are therefore exculpatory evidence.
ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR,  refused to turn over the exculpatory evidence, including the exculpatory audiotape.


Defense counsel and her investigator went to the Medina County Sheriff's Office to review the physical evidence. The sheriff's evidence control officer produced some, but not all of the physical evidence in this case.  The evidence control officer reported that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, had instructed her to withhold from defense counsel the following exculpatory evidence:
1)  The 9-1-1 dispatch tape of the purported incident;
2)  The exculpatory photographs of this defendant's wife, which do not depict injuries to this innocent defendant's wife, contrary to the perjured testimony of Salisbury's "key witness";
3)  The exculpatory audiotape of the May 29, 2009 interview of the purported victim, this innocent defendant's friend of more than 20 years.


During the evidence view, the evidence control officer produced an evidence control log, upon which she placed asterisks beside those items of exculpatory evidence that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, had forbidden her to present to defense counsel.


A COPY OF THE EVIDENCE CONTROL LOG, WITH OBVIOUS ASTERISKS, IS PICTURED BELOW:

Because SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, REFUSED TO TURN OVER THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, INCLUDING THE EXCULPATORY AUDIOTAPE, DEFENSE COUNSEL FILED A MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE.  


Defense counsel's Motion to Compel Discovery  can be found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=23


SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, filed no opposition to the Motion to Compel.
LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, simply ignored the defense Motion to Compel.  After all, LAPDOG COLLIER'S only allegiance is to HOLMAN THE CORRUPT so as to preserve his lifetime uncontested political appointment to the bench, compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and the Medina County Dem Party.


Failing to get the attention of either ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, or LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, defense counsel filed a Motion to Show Cause Why the Assistant Prosecutor Should Not Be Held in Contempt and Subject to Sanctions, which can be found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=53 .

Defense counsel's Motion to Show Cause really caused some consternation over at Kangaroo Courtroom No. 1 at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station.  LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, AND ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR all huddled in LAPDOG'S CHAMBERS.


Following the impromptu forbidden ex parte huddle in LAPDOG'S CHAMBERS, LAPDOG COLLIER TOOK THE BENCH, PALE AND NERVOUS.  HOLMAN THE CORRUPT was in the courtroom, just to make sure that LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG," did the "right thing."


After taking the bench, LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER waved the Show Cause Motion in the air and stated, "I'M NOT GOING TO DEAL WITH THIS RIGHT NOW!"


LAPDOG COLLIER NEVER DID ADDRESS THE SHOW CAUSE MOTION, AND NEVER COMPELLED SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, TO TURN OVER THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE!


MUCH MORE ABOUT THIS MATTER IN THE NEXT POST ....

A QUICK PEEK AT A FEW, BUT NOT ALL, OF THE CASE LAW LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, IGNORED AT THE TRIAL OF THE INNOCENT CITIZEN HE DELIBERATELY RAILROADED INTO PRISON

It may be worthy to consider some, but not all, of the controlling case law that LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, ignored and violated during the trial of the innocent citizen that LAPDOG COLLIER deliberately railroaded into prison in order to preserve his lifetime uncontested political appointment to the Medina County bench, compliments of CORRUPT DEM PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and the Medina County Dem Party.


DEMONSTRATED BELOW IS PRECISELY WHAT WE GET WHEN WE ARE DENIED THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO CHOOSE OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS, A HALLMARK OF MEDINA COUNTY POLITICS!


Any cite with "U.S." is a controlling decision of the United States Supreme Court and is the law of the land, except in Medina County!


HERE ARE SOME OF THE CASES THAT LAPDOG COLLIER DELIBERATELY OVERLOOKED AND IGNORED:

Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 635 (1886)

         - “Constitutional provisions for the security of person and property should be liberally construed. *** It is the duty of the courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon.”

Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 403-406 (1965)

         - The right of cross-examination, guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial

Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)

         - Evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment is not admissible at trial

Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 586 (1980)

         - “When police conduct a warrantless search, the state bears the burden of establishing the validity of the search.”

Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S.14 (1967)

         - Sixth Amendment right of a defendant to compulsory process extends to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment

Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 61-62 (2004)

         -  “The Confrontation Clause commands, not that the evidence be reliable, but that reliability be assessed in a particular manner: by testing in the crucible of cross-examination.”

Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315-318 (1974)

         - Denial of the “right of effective cross-examination” is “constitutional error of the first magnitude” requiring automatic  reversal

Sparf v. United States, 156 U.S. 51 (1895)

         - It is the duty of the court (not the prosecutor) to expound the law, and the jury to apply the facts to the law, otherwise the stability of justice and personal rights are jeopardized

Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133 (2005)

         - “It is…elementary law, federal and state, that the judge bears ultimate responsibility for instructing a lay jury in the law.”

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)

          - State’s obligation to disclose information and evidence favorable to the defendant

United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 104 (1976)

         - “… the Court has consistently held that a conviction obtained by the    knowing use of perjured testimony is fundamentally unfair,[Footnote 8] and must be set aside if there is any reasonable likelihood that the   false testimony could have affected the judgment of the jury.”

United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, Fn 7 (1976), citing Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U.S. 103

         - Due process of law “cannot be deemed to be satisfied by mere notice and hearing if a state has contrived a conviction through the pretense of a trial which in truth is but used as a means of depriving a defendant of liberty through a deliberate deception of court and jury by the presentation of testimony known to be perjured. Such a contrivance by a state to procure the conviction and   imprisonment of a defendant is an inconsistent with the rudimentary demands of justice as is the obtaining of a like result by intimidation.”

United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, Fn 8 (1985)

- “…the Brady rule has its roots in a series of cases dealing with convictions based on the prosecution's knowing use of perjured testimony. In Mooney v. Holohan, (1935), the Court established the rule that the knowing use by a state prosecutor of perjured testimony to obtain a conviction and the deliberate suppression of evidence that would have impeached and refuted the testimony constitutes a denial of due process.”

        

Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293, 307 (1966)

         - Government invasion of the defense camp compels conviction to be 

set aside as constitutionally defective

         

         

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 241 (1983)

         - Probable cause, to be determined on the totality of the circumstances, requires corroboration of a tip by independent police work/investigation

Whiteley v. Warden, 401 U.S. 560 (1971)

         - Criminal complaint not setting out a statement of essential facts does not pass constitutional muster

Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721, 724 (1969)

         - There is no exception to the rule that evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible at trial

Gray v. Mississippi, 481 U.S. 648, 668 (1987)

         - “We have recognized that "some constitutional rights [are] so basic to a fair trial that their infraction can never be treated as harmless error." Chapman v. California, 386 U.S., at 23. The right to an impartial adjudicator, be it judge or jury, is such a right.”

Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 172-173 (1997)

        

           - “As to a criminal defendant, Rule 403's term "unfair prejudice" speaks to the capacity of some concededly relevant evidence to lure the factfinder into declaring guilt on an improper basis rather than on proof specific to the offense charged. Such improper grounds certainly include generalizing from a past bad act that a defendant is by propensity the probable perpetrator of the current crime. Thus, Rule 403 requires that the relative probative value of prior-conviction evidence be balanced against its prejudicial risk of misuse. A judge should balance these factors not only for the item in question but also for any actually available substitutes. If an alternative were found to have substantially the same or greater probative value  but a lower danger of unfair prejudice, sound judicial discretion would discount the value of the item first offered and exclude it if its discounted probative value were substantially outweighed by unfairly prejudicial risk. Pp. 180-185.”

Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, at 14 (2006)

         - “Through the in limine procedure, the (courts) should redact or exclude the portions of any statement that have become testimonial, as they do, for example, with unduly prejudicial portions of otherwise    admissible evidence.”

Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40 (1980)

         - Individual cannot be compelled to testify against a spouse

Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, at syllabus ¶ 2

         - “Criminal defendants have the right under the Compulsory Process Clause to the government’s assistance in compelling the attendance of favorable witnesses at trial, and the right to put before a jury evidence that might influence the determination of guilt.”

Holloway v. Florida, 449 U.S. 905, 907 (1980)

         

- “Thus the Court more than once has expressed the understanding that a lesser-included-offense (instruction) minimizes the risk of 

undermining the reasonable-doubt standard.”

    

        

Sansone v. United States, 330 U.S. 343, 349 (1965)

         - “In a case where some elements of the crime charged themselves constitute a lesser crime, if the evidence justified it, would no doubt be entitled to an instruction which would permit a finding of guilt of the lesser offense.”

State v. Morris, 2007-Ohio-3591, at ¶ 37

         - In the prosecution for alleged violations of 2911.11 ORC, “due process requires that the particularized nature of the accused’s conduct includes the behavior that demonstrates he committed an underlying offense.”

State v. Hous, 2004-Ohio-666, at ¶ 11

         -  “…jury instructions given at the end of a trial cannot relate back to give an accused adequate notice of the charges against which an accused must defend….”

State v. Hubbard, 2004-Ohio-5204, at ¶ 6

         - “Under Evid.R. 602, a witness may testify only to those matters of which he has personal knowledge…gained through firsthand observation or experience and actually perceived the subject matter of his testimony.”

State v. Taylor, (1993) 66 Ohio St. 3d 295, 300-301

         - “For a purported excited utterance to be admissible there must have been: …(4) the declarant must have personally observed the event.”

Cox v. Oliver Machinery Co., (1987) 41 Ohio App. 3d 28, at 35-36

         - “The key to the statement’s trustworthiness is the spontaneity of the statement, either contemporaneous with the event or immediately

thereafter.”

State v. Mitchell, 2007-Ohio-1696, at ¶ 19

         - “The Ohio Supreme Court has recently affirmed that recordings of 911 calls that were made to avoid immediate danger are not testimonial and do not violate the Confrontation Clause when the declarant is not available to testify at trial.”

State v. Henness (1997), 79 Ohio St. 3d 53, ¶ 1 of the syllabus

         - “…the testifying spouse remains incompetent *** until she makes a deliberate choice to testify, with knowledge of her right to refuse. The trial court must take an active role in determining competency, and must make an affirmative determination on the record that the spouse has elected to testify.”

State v. Hunt (1994), 97 Ohio App. 3d 372 

          - holding that a cross-examiner may not make testimonial assertions under the pretext of asking a question

THE ABOVE LIST OF CASES DOES NOT CONTAIN THOSE CASES IN WHICH LAPDOG COLLIER AND ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, BOTH STUPID CRIMINALS, HAVE BEEN OVERTURNED BY THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS.

SOME OF THOSE CASES HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED PREVIOUSLY AT THIS BLOG!

YOU CAN BE ASSURED THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, AND ASS PROS. SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, WILL BE RELYING ON THESE AND OTHER CASES WHEN PLEADING THEIR OWN CASES IN U.S. DISTRICT COURT!

IT IS PATENTLY OBVIOUS THAT A BROOM NEEDS TO BE TAKEN TO THE ENTIRE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTICE" SYSTEM AND EACH & EVERY ONE OF THESE "PUBLIC SERVANTS" NEEDS TO BE SWEPT OUT OF OFFICE AND BACK TO CHASING AMBULANCES, WHERE THEY ALL BELONG!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG COLLIER AND SALISBURY THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, THOSE TWO STUPID CRIMINALS, PLAY THE MEDINA COUNTY SHELL GAME

HMost readers are likely aware of the age-old shell game.  In the shell game, the operator places a pea beneath one of three shells.  Individual place best that they can locate the shell concealing the pea, after the operator has rapidly shuffled the shells.

LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER and MEDINA ASS PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, have devised their own version of the MEDINA COUNTY SHELL GAME.


Unlike the original shell game, however, LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, BOTH STUPID CRIMINALS, play the same shell game, but only with witnesses adverse to their unlawful "positions."  


THE MEDINA COUNTY SHELL GAME SEEMS TO BE COMMONLY PLAYED IN THE CORRUPT COURTS OF MEDINA COUNTY.


Take, for example, the case of the son of Medina County Assistant Prosecutor William Thorne, who was cited for his second DUI and summoned to the Wadsworth Municipal Court.  Not surprisingly, the State Trooper who issued the citation simply "forgot" to appear in Wadsworth Municipal Court  ... on two separate occasions.  Also, not surprising, "Judge" McIlvaine dismissed the case!  [See prior post, captioned MORE HOLMAN CORRUPTION REPORTED BY ANOTHER MEDINA COUNTY CITIZEN, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/10/more-holman-corruption-reported-by.html ]

In the case of the innocent man railroaded into prison by LAPDOG COLLIER, being profiled at this blog, LAPDOG COLLIER and ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, hid Medina County sheriff's deputy DOUGLAS CLINAGE, who, although he had been served with a defense subpoena to appear at trial and give testimony, simply ignored the defense subpoena upon instruction from SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.  


LAPDOG COLLIER, even though repetedly advised by defense counsel that CLINAGE had failed to appear, took no action to compel ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY to produce CLINAGE.


HERE IS MORE PROOF THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, INTENTIONALLY VIOLATED  THIS INNOCENT CITIZEN'S THE RIGHT TO CONFRONT HIS ACCUSERS, GUARANTEED BY THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION:


Pictured below, although not a good reproduction, is a copy of the defense trial subpoena served upon deputy CLINAGE:

Having been shown that CLINAGE had been subpoenaed to appear and testify, presented below is Page 766  from the corrupted "official"transcript, demonstrating that defense counsel gave notice to LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, that CLINAGE had failed to appear, as LAPDOG COLLIER well knew:

As the reader can plainly see, when notified that CLINAGE had failed to appear, LAPDOG COLLIER'S ONLY RESPONSE WAS NO RESPONSE!  LAPDOG COLLIER just wanted to dispense with all of those cumbersome formalities, like presenting proof of innocence, and get right down to sentencing.


It is also perfectly clear, from the portion of the tainted "official" transcript that LAPDOG COLLIER, THE STUPID CRIMINAL, did not cut out of the transcript, that ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, INSTRUCTED CLINAGE TO DISREGARD THE DEFENSE SUBPOENA AND TO DISAPPEAR !


Picture below is Page 213 from the corrupted "official" transcript that proves the point:

At lines 5 -8 on Page 213 (pictured above), from the very mouth of ASS SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR:

"Judge, I have another witness [CLINAGE] in the courtroom bringing in evidence.  Could I just - - I want him to just bring it in and HE CAN LEAVE." 

So it was!  CLINAGE waddled into the courtroom, presented the illegally seized evidence to SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, and exited the courtroom and the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station, never to be seen again.


CLINAGE was never sworn as a witness, and offered no testimony.


LAPDOG COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, STUPID CRIMINALS BOTH, HID CLINAGE IN THE FINEST TRADITIONS OF THE MEDINA COUNTY SHELL GAME.  


Although, it is always possible that CLINAGE, who received his advance police training from the KEYSTONE COPS, simply lost the written directions from the sheriff's office to the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station and simply could not find his way back.


MUCH MORE TO COME .... 

THE "MEDINA SOLUTION" TO A LEGAL CONUNDRUM

Taken from the online edition of the Canton Repository:

MASSILLON —  Stark County’s chief criminal prosecutor is facing allegations that he drove under the influence. 

Dennis E. Barr, 53, of Canton, entered a written not-guilty plea Tuesday in Municipal Court through defense attorney Christopher Newlon. 

Barr is charged with a misdemeanor count of operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol, a drug of abuse or a combination of them. The offense carries a penalty ranging from a three-day driver-intervention program to six months in jail.

IT WOULD APPEAR THAT MR. BARR IS PRESENTLY IN THE SOUP. The entire online article can be found at  http://www.cantonrep.com/news/x123112686/Top-criminal-prosecutor-charged-with-driving-under-the-influence .

Assuming that Mr. Barr will be appearing before an honest judge, the likes of which cannot be found in the courts of Medina County, he is truly in the proverbial pickle.  It would be rather hypocritical of Barr to prosecute DUI offenders when he has engaged in like and similar conduct.

What, oh what, to do?

Mr. Barr would be well served to place an immediate phone call CORRUPT MEDINA PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, who can give Barr some sound advice as to how to BEAT THE RAP!

HERE IS A GUARANTEED WINNER, TAKEN FOM THE PLAYBOOOK OF HOLMAN THE CORRUPT.

The first thing that Barr should do is file an AFFIDAVIT OF DISQUALIFICATION with the Chief Justice of the Ohio Supreme Court.  He need not worry whether he has a good faith basis to bring the Affidavit.  He can just make up a few grounds and misrepresent the facts, just like HOLMAN THE CORRUPT.

After Mr. Barr has deep-sixed the honest Stark County Judge, he needs to do a little political maneuvering.

First, he needs to have the Stark County Prosecutor, Mr. Barr's superior, appoint CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN to the position of Special Prosecutor.  This is a time-worn tactic reciprocally used by HOLMAN THE CORRUPT and ERIE COUNTY PROSECUTOR RANDY BAXTER, who apparently thinks it to be perfectly "ethical" to have sexual relations with a witness in an upcoming murder trial.  [ See prior post at this blog, captioned CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DEAN HOLMAN PREPARES TO PROSECUTE HIS OWN CO-DEFENDANT!, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/11/corrupt-medina-county-prosecutor-dean.html ]

Once HOLMAN THE CORRUPT is on board, the next move is to have HOLMAN THE CORRUPT arrange to have one of his subordinates, that is one of the Medina County judges, volunteer to sit by assignment in Mr. Barr's case.

Since Mr. Barr's case will likely be heard in one of the municipal courts of Stark County, the perfect choice for the job is "Judge" Stephen McIlvaine, from the Wadsworth Municipal Court.

Regular readers of this blog will recall that McIlvaine is one of those politically well-placed "judges" who recently won re-election by a landslide in one of those uncontested "races" in the most recent infamous Medina County rigged elections.  [ See prior post at this blog, captioned ANOTHER UNOPPOSED JUDGE WINS ELECTION IN A LANDSLIDE! found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/11/another-unopposed-judge-wins-election.html ]

McIlvaine is the perfect puppet for this job.  He can just make this little inconvenient DUI simply just go away, JUST LIKE HE DID FOR THE SON OF MEDINA COUNTY ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR WILLIAM THORNE .... TWICE !!!  [ See prior post at this blog, captioned MORE HOLMAN CORRUPTION REPORTED BY ANOTHER MEDINA COUNTY CITIZEN found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/10/more-holman-corruption-reported-by.html ]

Now, only one more step to be taken by HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, and this will all be a done deal.

All HOLMAN THE CORRUPT need do now is to place a telephone call to the State Highway Patrol Post and make sure that the trooper who issued the citation to Barr just fails to show up at court, JUST LIKE HE DID IN THE MATTER OF THE SON OF WILLIAM THORNE AND, MORE TO THE POINT, LIKE HE DID IN THE CASE BEING PROFILED AT THIS BLOG, WHERE HOLMAN THE CORRUPT AND SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR AND ANOTHER STUPID CRIMINAL SIMPLY INSTRUCTED SHERIFF'S DEPUTY DOUGLAS CLINAGE TO FAIL TO APPEAR EVEN THOUGH CLINAGE HAD BEEN SUBPOENAED BY THE DEFENSE TO APPEAR AND GIVE TESTIMONY!


WITH HOLMAN THE CORRUPT AS THE "SPECIAL" PROSECUTOR AND McILVAINE SITTING ON THE BENCH AS THE VISITING JUDGE, MR. BARR HASN'T A WORRY IN THE WORLD.


THAT'S HOW IT'S DONE IN MEDINA COUNTY.  JUST ONE MORE DAY, BUSINESS AS USUAL, IN THE CORRUPT COURTS OF MEDINA COUNTY.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

SALISBURY , THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, SCOFFS AT THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR,  like LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER and CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, has gotten away for so long with his criminal conduct, under the color of law, for so long that he has the misperception that he is ABOVE THE LAW, just like LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER and HOLMAN THE CORRUPT.


The very simple and unassailable fact is that these three have proven to be no more than STUPID COMMON CRIMINALS!


SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, in his extreme ARROGANCE, has gone so far as to SCOFF AT SPECIAL AGENTS OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION.


FOLLOWS IS AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE THAT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, SENT TO THIS BLOG:

As readers can plainly see, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR,  contemptuously refers to Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation as "FLUNKIES."


This blogger's best guess is that, when he is shown those gold badges by FBI Special Agents, more likely than not, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, WILL SOIL HIS PANTS!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

IT GETS WORSE FOR LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL

In the very prior post at this blog, readers were shown undeniable proof that LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, and MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY have materially altered the transcript of the suppression hearing testimony of sheriff's deputy Frank Telatko by excising a rather large portion of Telatko's testimony, beginning at Page 179 of the corrupted transcript.


By removing certain portions of the suppression hearing testimony of sheriff's deputies Douglas Clinage and Frank Telatko, and specifically Telatko's testimony that "WE ARRESTED HIM (DEFENDANT) SO WE COULD SORT IT OUT LATER," LAPDOG COLLIER, THE STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, BELIEVED HE WAS "HOME FREE" WITH THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS AND THE COURT OF APPEALS WOULD DENY THIS INNOCENT MAN A FAIR HEARING ON HIS DIRECT APPEAL.


If there were no testimony to the effect that sheriff's deputies lacked probable cause to arrest this innocent defendant, LAPDOG COLLIER "reasoned,"the Ninth District Court of Appeals would not be able to criticize LAPDOG COLLIER for failing to suppress obvious illegally seized evidence.


It hasn't worked out that way, however, because this innocent defendant's trial attorney and investigator have read the corrupted transcripts and detected NUMEROUS UNLAWFUL MATERIAL ALTERATIONS TO THE TAINTED "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT, ALL CALCULATED AND DESIGNED TO DENY THIS INNOCENT MAN A FAIR HEARING ON HIS APPEAL, AND TO KEEP HIM UNLAWFULLY IMPRISONED.


To further complicate LAPDOG COLLIER'S now tenuous grip on his lifetime political appointment to the Medina County bench, LAPDOG COLLIER and MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY forgot about and failed to excise a portion of the trial testimony of  sheriff's deputy Frank Telatko, referencing his prior testimony at the October 9, 2009 suppression hearing that, "WE TOOK HIM INTO CUSTODY SO WE COULD SORT IT OUT LATER."


PICTURED BELOW IS PAGE 369 OF THE CROSS-EXAMINATION OF THE TRIAL TESTIMONY OF FRANK TELATKO:

At lines 17-24 of the trial testimony of Telatko, defense counsel asked him:

       "All right.  And on October 9^th, when you testified, do your remember being asked this questions and giving this answer?            “What did you arrest him for?”
            And you said, “I don’t know,” you wanted to take him into custody and sort it our later?            Do you remember saying you were going to say you were going to “sort it out later?”  

 SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, lodged an immediate objection, of course.


NOTWITHSTANDING HIS BEST, BUT BUMBLING EFFORTS, LAPDOG COLLIER, THE STUPID CRIMINAL, FAILED TO REMOVE ALL TRACES OF TELATKO'S SUPPRESSION TESTIMONY, AS DEMONSTRATED ABOVE.

STUPID CRIMINALS MAKE STUPID MISTAKES.  LAPDOG COLLIER IS NO EXCEPTION TO THE RULE!

LAPDOG COLLIER IS INDEED JUST ONE MORE STUPID CRIMINAL!


THIS IS BUT ONE MORE EXAMPLE OF LAPDOG COLLIER'S CRIMINAL CONDUCT IN TAMPERING WITH AND MATERIALLY ALTERING THE CORRUPTED TRANSCRIPT.


THE CRIME?  TAMPERING WITH RECORDS, A FELONY OFFENSE OF THE THIRD DEGREE.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....