THE PLOT THICKENS AS LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THAT REALLY STUPID CRIMINAL, VIOLATES THE LAW...AGAIN!

In the prior post at this blog, readers were shown how LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THAT STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, impeded efforts by the defense to obtain the EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE that ASS PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY DELIBERATELY WITHHELD FROM THIS INNOCENT MAN, WHO LAPDOG COLLIER RAILROADED INTO PRISON.


LAPDOG COLLIER, of course, railroaded this innocent citizen, as he's railroaded countless other citizens, motivated only by his desire to preserve his uncontested lifetime political appointment to the Medina County bench, compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and the Medina County Dem Party.


As readers may recall from the prior post, LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, REFUSED TO COMPEL SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, TO TURN OVER THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, INCLUDING AN EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPED INTERVIEW OF THIS INNOCENT DEFENDANT'S FRIEND OF 20 YEARS, WHO TOLD KEYSTONE SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES THAT THIS INNOCENT DEFENDANT HAD NOT BURGLARIZED HIS HOME AND THAT HE DID NOT WISH TO PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES.


THE PLOT, HOWEVER, THICKENS AND DEMONSTRATES THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, VIOLATED THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OHIO AT TRIAL, SPECIFICALLY TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, A FELONY OFFENSE OF THE THIRD DEGREE!


THE SUBJECT ADDRESSED BELOW CONCERNS THE EXCULPATORY  AUDIO TAPE:


During one session of the four-part suppression hearing, defense counsel requested access to the exculpatory audio tape.  At Page 143 of the tainted transcript of the suppression hearing, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, turned over the exculpatory audio tape to LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER.


Pictured below is page 143 from the tainted transcript of the suppression hearing:

Readers will take note that, at Lines 14-15, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR states to LAPDOG COLLIER, "I'M GIVING YOU THE TAPE. HERE'S THE TAPE."


We now have LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THAT STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, in possession of the exculpatory audio tape!


Time marches on, but LAPDOG COLLIER has not made the exculpatory audio tape available to the defense.


On November 9, 2009, the morning of the first day of trial, defense counsel was discussing preliminary legal matter with LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, during a discussion of motions in limine.


During those preliminary discussions, before the jury is brought in to hear the testimony, defense counsel once again brought up the matter of the exculpatory evidence, including the exculpatory audio tape, in LAPDOG COLLIER'S POSSESSION.


A Page 14 of the tainted "official" transcript of the motions in limine, defense counsel once again raised the issue of the exculpatory audio tape, and requested LAPDOG COLLIER to conduct an in camera (in chambers) review of the contents of the exculpatory audio tape.  LAPDOG COLLIER, ever the puppet of HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, stated to defense counsel, as if he meant it, "I'll do that prior to cross (examination)."


Then, Ass Prosecutor SALISBURY stated to LAPDOG COLLIER, at Lines 14-15, "I have given that tape to you, Judge."


A copy of Page 14 from the tainted "official" transcript of the motions in limine is pictured below:

An extremely important comment from LAPDOG COLLIER is to be found at Lines 20-24, where the CORRUPT JUDGE says:

"I'll listen to Mr. Leighton's (audio-taped interview) tonight or tomorrow prior to any examination, and I'll give you an opportunity to - - then I'll seal it and give it to the court reporter - -"

NEEDLESS TO SAY, LAPDOG COLLIER NEVER MADE THE EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPE AVAILABLE TO THE DEFENSE AT TRIAL, OR AT ANY OTHER TIME!

Once again, we turn to the tainted "official" transcript of the proceedings, knowingly filed by MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY. 


Pictured below is Page 4 of the tainted "official" transcript, which identifies all of ASS SALISBURY'S PURPORTED EVIDENCE:

Looking at SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR'S marked evidence:


Item #1 - White evidence box that contained the .22 caliber single action western-style revolver,   seized UNLOADED from this innocent defendant when unlawfully arrested by the KEYSTONE COPS from the Medina County sheriff's office; one western-style gun belt and holster; and one pocket knife.


Item #2 - Bullets : .22 caliber rounds taken from the western-style gun belt.


Item #3 - Cassette tape of the recording of the 9-1-1 tape, in which ASS SALISBURY'S "key witness stated that she never saw this innocent defendant during the entirety of the purported incident, that was actually no incident at all.


FROM PAGE 4, SHOWN ABOVE, IT CAN BE CONCLUDED THAT:


1)  LAPDOG COLLIER NEVER PLACED THE EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPE IN A SEALED ENVELOPE;


2)  LAPDOG COLLIER NEVER TURNED THE EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPE OVER TO THE COURT REPORTER; AND


3)  LAPDOG COLLIER NOT ONLY WITHHELD THE EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPE FROM THE DEFENSE, BUT THAT HE WITHHELD IT FROM THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS SO AS TO CONCEAL FROM THE NINTH DISTRICT, THAT THE AUDIO TAPE WAS , INDEED, EXCULPATORY, AND THAT LAPDOG COLLIER UNLAWFULLY WITHHELD THE EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPE FROM THE DEFENSE OF THIS INNOCENT MAN.


THIS IS MORE PROOF POSITIVE THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, A REALLY STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, VIOLATED THE LAW, SPECIFICALLY TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, A FELONY OF THE THIRD DEGREE, WHEN HE CONCEALED THIS EVIDENCE.


LAPDOG COLLIER HAS PROVEN, ONCE AGAIN, THAT HE REALLY IS A STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL WHO DESERVES NOTHING LESS THAN MANY YEARS BEHIND PRISON BARS FOR HIS CRIMES!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

MORE PROOF OF THE CRIMINAL CONDUCT OF LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THAT STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL

One of the serious appellate and criminal issues arising from the corrupted trial of this innocent man who was railroaded into prison by LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, IS THE FACT THAT ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR AND LAPDOG COLLIER BOTH DELIBERATELY WITHHELD AND CONCEALED EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENDANT, FROM THE DEFENSE COUNSEL.


Defense counsel requested the May, 29, 2009, exculpatory audio-taped interview of the purported victim, this innocent defendant's friend of more than 20 years.  In his May 29 interview with sheriff's deputies DOUGLAS CLINAGE and FRANK TELATKO, the purported victim told these Keystone Deputies that this innocent citizen HAD NOT BURGLARIZED HIS HOME AND THAT HE DID NOT WANT TO PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES.


Defense Counsel's Discovery Request can be found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=14


Needless to say, those statements are favorable to the defendant, and are therefore exculpatory evidence.
ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR,  refused to turn over the exculpatory evidence, including the exculpatory audiotape.


Defense counsel and her investigator went to the Medina County Sheriff's Office to review the physical evidence. The sheriff's evidence control officer produced some, but not all of the physical evidence in this case.  The evidence control officer reported that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, had instructed her to withhold from defense counsel the following exculpatory evidence:
1)  The 9-1-1 dispatch tape of the purported incident;
2)  The exculpatory photographs of this defendant's wife, which do not depict injuries to this innocent defendant's wife, contrary to the perjured testimony of Salisbury's "key witness";
3)  The exculpatory audiotape of the May 29, 2009 interview of the purported victim, this innocent defendant's friend of more than 20 years.


During the evidence view, the evidence control officer produced an evidence control log, upon which she placed asterisks beside those items of exculpatory evidence that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, had forbidden her to present to defense counsel.


A COPY OF THE EVIDENCE CONTROL LOG, WITH OBVIOUS ASTERISKS, IS PICTURED BELOW:

Because SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, REFUSED TO TURN OVER THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, INCLUDING THE EXCULPATORY AUDIOTAPE, DEFENSE COUNSEL FILED A MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE.  


Defense counsel's Motion to Compel Discovery  can be found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=23


SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, filed no opposition to the Motion to Compel.
LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, simply ignored the defense Motion to Compel.  After all, LAPDOG COLLIER'S only allegiance is to HOLMAN THE CORRUPT so as to preserve his lifetime uncontested political appointment to the bench, compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and the Medina County Dem Party.


Failing to get the attention of either ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, or LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, defense counsel filed a Motion to Show Cause Why the Assistant Prosecutor Should Not Be Held in Contempt and Subject to Sanctions, which can be found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=53 .

Defense counsel's Motion to Show Cause really caused some consternation over at Kangaroo Courtroom No. 1 at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station.  LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, AND ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR all huddled in LAPDOG'S CHAMBERS.


Following the impromptu forbidden ex parte huddle in LAPDOG'S CHAMBERS, LAPDOG COLLIER TOOK THE BENCH, PALE AND NERVOUS.  HOLMAN THE CORRUPT was in the courtroom, just to make sure that LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG," did the "right thing."


After taking the bench, LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER waved the Show Cause Motion in the air and stated, "I'M NOT GOING TO DEAL WITH THIS RIGHT NOW!"


LAPDOG COLLIER NEVER DID ADDRESS THE SHOW CAUSE MOTION, AND NEVER COMPELLED SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, TO TURN OVER THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE!


MUCH MORE ABOUT THIS MATTER IN THE NEXT POST ....

A QUICK PEEK AT A FEW, BUT NOT ALL, OF THE CASE LAW LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, IGNORED AT THE TRIAL OF THE INNOCENT CITIZEN HE DELIBERATELY RAILROADED INTO PRISON

It may be worthy to consider some, but not all, of the controlling case law that LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, ignored and violated during the trial of the innocent citizen that LAPDOG COLLIER deliberately railroaded into prison in order to preserve his lifetime uncontested political appointment to the Medina County bench, compliments of CORRUPT DEM PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and the Medina County Dem Party.


DEMONSTRATED BELOW IS PRECISELY WHAT WE GET WHEN WE ARE DENIED THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO CHOOSE OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS, A HALLMARK OF MEDINA COUNTY POLITICS!


Any cite with "U.S." is a controlling decision of the United States Supreme Court and is the law of the land, except in Medina County!


HERE ARE SOME OF THE CASES THAT LAPDOG COLLIER DELIBERATELY OVERLOOKED AND IGNORED:

Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 635 (1886)

         - “Constitutional provisions for the security of person and property should be liberally construed. *** It is the duty of the courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon.”

Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 403-406 (1965)

         - The right of cross-examination, guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial

Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)

         - Evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment is not admissible at trial

Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 586 (1980)

         - “When police conduct a warrantless search, the state bears the burden of establishing the validity of the search.”

Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S.14 (1967)

         - Sixth Amendment right of a defendant to compulsory process extends to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment

Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 61-62 (2004)

         -  “The Confrontation Clause commands, not that the evidence be reliable, but that reliability be assessed in a particular manner: by testing in the crucible of cross-examination.”

Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315-318 (1974)

         - Denial of the “right of effective cross-examination” is “constitutional error of the first magnitude” requiring automatic  reversal

Sparf v. United States, 156 U.S. 51 (1895)

         - It is the duty of the court (not the prosecutor) to expound the law, and the jury to apply the facts to the law, otherwise the stability of justice and personal rights are jeopardized

Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133 (2005)

         - “It is…elementary law, federal and state, that the judge bears ultimate responsibility for instructing a lay jury in the law.”

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)

          - State’s obligation to disclose information and evidence favorable to the defendant

United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 104 (1976)

         - “… the Court has consistently held that a conviction obtained by the    knowing use of perjured testimony is fundamentally unfair,[Footnote 8] and must be set aside if there is any reasonable likelihood that the   false testimony could have affected the judgment of the jury.”

United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, Fn 7 (1976), citing Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U.S. 103

         - Due process of law “cannot be deemed to be satisfied by mere notice and hearing if a state has contrived a conviction through the pretense of a trial which in truth is but used as a means of depriving a defendant of liberty through a deliberate deception of court and jury by the presentation of testimony known to be perjured. Such a contrivance by a state to procure the conviction and   imprisonment of a defendant is an inconsistent with the rudimentary demands of justice as is the obtaining of a like result by intimidation.”

United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, Fn 8 (1985)

- “…the Brady rule has its roots in a series of cases dealing with convictions based on the prosecution's knowing use of perjured testimony. In Mooney v. Holohan, (1935), the Court established the rule that the knowing use by a state prosecutor of perjured testimony to obtain a conviction and the deliberate suppression of evidence that would have impeached and refuted the testimony constitutes a denial of due process.”

        

Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293, 307 (1966)

         - Government invasion of the defense camp compels conviction to be 

set aside as constitutionally defective

         

         

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 241 (1983)

         - Probable cause, to be determined on the totality of the circumstances, requires corroboration of a tip by independent police work/investigation

Whiteley v. Warden, 401 U.S. 560 (1971)

         - Criminal complaint not setting out a statement of essential facts does not pass constitutional muster

Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721, 724 (1969)

         - There is no exception to the rule that evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible at trial

Gray v. Mississippi, 481 U.S. 648, 668 (1987)

         - “We have recognized that "some constitutional rights [are] so basic to a fair trial that their infraction can never be treated as harmless error." Chapman v. California, 386 U.S., at 23. The right to an impartial adjudicator, be it judge or jury, is such a right.”

Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 172-173 (1997)

        

           - “As to a criminal defendant, Rule 403's term "unfair prejudice" speaks to the capacity of some concededly relevant evidence to lure the factfinder into declaring guilt on an improper basis rather than on proof specific to the offense charged. Such improper grounds certainly include generalizing from a past bad act that a defendant is by propensity the probable perpetrator of the current crime. Thus, Rule 403 requires that the relative probative value of prior-conviction evidence be balanced against its prejudicial risk of misuse. A judge should balance these factors not only for the item in question but also for any actually available substitutes. If an alternative were found to have substantially the same or greater probative value  but a lower danger of unfair prejudice, sound judicial discretion would discount the value of the item first offered and exclude it if its discounted probative value were substantially outweighed by unfairly prejudicial risk. Pp. 180-185.”

Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, at 14 (2006)

         - “Through the in limine procedure, the (courts) should redact or exclude the portions of any statement that have become testimonial, as they do, for example, with unduly prejudicial portions of otherwise    admissible evidence.”

Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40 (1980)

         - Individual cannot be compelled to testify against a spouse

Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, at syllabus ¶ 2

         - “Criminal defendants have the right under the Compulsory Process Clause to the government’s assistance in compelling the attendance of favorable witnesses at trial, and the right to put before a jury evidence that might influence the determination of guilt.”

Holloway v. Florida, 449 U.S. 905, 907 (1980)

         

- “Thus the Court more than once has expressed the understanding that a lesser-included-offense (instruction) minimizes the risk of 

undermining the reasonable-doubt standard.”

    

        

Sansone v. United States, 330 U.S. 343, 349 (1965)

         - “In a case where some elements of the crime charged themselves constitute a lesser crime, if the evidence justified it, would no doubt be entitled to an instruction which would permit a finding of guilt of the lesser offense.”

State v. Morris, 2007-Ohio-3591, at ¶ 37

         - In the prosecution for alleged violations of 2911.11 ORC, “due process requires that the particularized nature of the accused’s conduct includes the behavior that demonstrates he committed an underlying offense.”

State v. Hous, 2004-Ohio-666, at ¶ 11

         -  “…jury instructions given at the end of a trial cannot relate back to give an accused adequate notice of the charges against which an accused must defend….”

State v. Hubbard, 2004-Ohio-5204, at ¶ 6

         - “Under Evid.R. 602, a witness may testify only to those matters of which he has personal knowledge…gained through firsthand observation or experience and actually perceived the subject matter of his testimony.”

State v. Taylor, (1993) 66 Ohio St. 3d 295, 300-301

         - “For a purported excited utterance to be admissible there must have been: …(4) the declarant must have personally observed the event.”

Cox v. Oliver Machinery Co., (1987) 41 Ohio App. 3d 28, at 35-36

         - “The key to the statement’s trustworthiness is the spontaneity of the statement, either contemporaneous with the event or immediately

thereafter.”

State v. Mitchell, 2007-Ohio-1696, at ¶ 19

         - “The Ohio Supreme Court has recently affirmed that recordings of 911 calls that were made to avoid immediate danger are not testimonial and do not violate the Confrontation Clause when the declarant is not available to testify at trial.”

State v. Henness (1997), 79 Ohio St. 3d 53, ¶ 1 of the syllabus

         - “…the testifying spouse remains incompetent *** until she makes a deliberate choice to testify, with knowledge of her right to refuse. The trial court must take an active role in determining competency, and must make an affirmative determination on the record that the spouse has elected to testify.”

State v. Hunt (1994), 97 Ohio App. 3d 372 

          - holding that a cross-examiner may not make testimonial assertions under the pretext of asking a question

THE ABOVE LIST OF CASES DOES NOT CONTAIN THOSE CASES IN WHICH LAPDOG COLLIER AND ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, BOTH STUPID CRIMINALS, HAVE BEEN OVERTURNED BY THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS.

SOME OF THOSE CASES HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED PREVIOUSLY AT THIS BLOG!

YOU CAN BE ASSURED THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, AND ASS PROS. SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, WILL BE RELYING ON THESE AND OTHER CASES WHEN PLEADING THEIR OWN CASES IN U.S. DISTRICT COURT!

IT IS PATENTLY OBVIOUS THAT A BROOM NEEDS TO BE TAKEN TO THE ENTIRE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTICE" SYSTEM AND EACH & EVERY ONE OF THESE "PUBLIC SERVANTS" NEEDS TO BE SWEPT OUT OF OFFICE AND BACK TO CHASING AMBULANCES, WHERE THEY ALL BELONG!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG COLLIER AND SALISBURY THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, THOSE TWO STUPID CRIMINALS, PLAY THE MEDINA COUNTY SHELL GAME

HMost readers are likely aware of the age-old shell game.  In the shell game, the operator places a pea beneath one of three shells.  Individual place best that they can locate the shell concealing the pea, after the operator has rapidly shuffled the shells.

LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER and MEDINA ASS PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, have devised their own version of the MEDINA COUNTY SHELL GAME.


Unlike the original shell game, however, LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, BOTH STUPID CRIMINALS, play the same shell game, but only with witnesses adverse to their unlawful "positions."  


THE MEDINA COUNTY SHELL GAME SEEMS TO BE COMMONLY PLAYED IN THE CORRUPT COURTS OF MEDINA COUNTY.


Take, for example, the case of the son of Medina County Assistant Prosecutor William Thorne, who was cited for his second DUI and summoned to the Wadsworth Municipal Court.  Not surprisingly, the State Trooper who issued the citation simply "forgot" to appear in Wadsworth Municipal Court  ... on two separate occasions.  Also, not surprising, "Judge" McIlvaine dismissed the case!  [See prior post, captioned MORE HOLMAN CORRUPTION REPORTED BY ANOTHER MEDINA COUNTY CITIZEN, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/10/more-holman-corruption-reported-by.html ]

In the case of the innocent man railroaded into prison by LAPDOG COLLIER, being profiled at this blog, LAPDOG COLLIER and ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, hid Medina County sheriff's deputy DOUGLAS CLINAGE, who, although he had been served with a defense subpoena to appear at trial and give testimony, simply ignored the defense subpoena upon instruction from SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.  


LAPDOG COLLIER, even though repetedly advised by defense counsel that CLINAGE had failed to appear, took no action to compel ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY to produce CLINAGE.


HERE IS MORE PROOF THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, INTENTIONALLY VIOLATED  THIS INNOCENT CITIZEN'S THE RIGHT TO CONFRONT HIS ACCUSERS, GUARANTEED BY THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION:


Pictured below, although not a good reproduction, is a copy of the defense trial subpoena served upon deputy CLINAGE:

Having been shown that CLINAGE had been subpoenaed to appear and testify, presented below is Page 766  from the corrupted "official"transcript, demonstrating that defense counsel gave notice to LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, that CLINAGE had failed to appear, as LAPDOG COLLIER well knew:

As the reader can plainly see, when notified that CLINAGE had failed to appear, LAPDOG COLLIER'S ONLY RESPONSE WAS NO RESPONSE!  LAPDOG COLLIER just wanted to dispense with all of those cumbersome formalities, like presenting proof of innocence, and get right down to sentencing.


It is also perfectly clear, from the portion of the tainted "official" transcript that LAPDOG COLLIER, THE STUPID CRIMINAL, did not cut out of the transcript, that ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, INSTRUCTED CLINAGE TO DISREGARD THE DEFENSE SUBPOENA AND TO DISAPPEAR !


Picture below is Page 213 from the corrupted "official" transcript that proves the point:

At lines 5 -8 on Page 213 (pictured above), from the very mouth of ASS SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR:

"Judge, I have another witness [CLINAGE] in the courtroom bringing in evidence.  Could I just - - I want him to just bring it in and HE CAN LEAVE." 

So it was!  CLINAGE waddled into the courtroom, presented the illegally seized evidence to SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, and exited the courtroom and the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station, never to be seen again.


CLINAGE was never sworn as a witness, and offered no testimony.


LAPDOG COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, STUPID CRIMINALS BOTH, HID CLINAGE IN THE FINEST TRADITIONS OF THE MEDINA COUNTY SHELL GAME.  


Although, it is always possible that CLINAGE, who received his advance police training from the KEYSTONE COPS, simply lost the written directions from the sheriff's office to the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station and simply could not find his way back.


MUCH MORE TO COME .... 

MEDINA COMMUNITY THEATER CASTING CALLS

This year, the Medina County Community Theater is presenting its adaptation of the classic production of Pinocchio.

Auditions have been held and the competition for the lead role was fierce.  After four rounds of reading, the producers reduced the pool of potentials to two leading contenders: LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THAT STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, who regularly displays his thespian tendencies in Kangaroo Courtroom No. 1 at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station; and MEDINA ASS PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR. 


At first blush, SALISBURY was a hands-down favorite for the lead role of Pinocchio since he has developed a long-term and widely recognized reputation in the community as a PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.


However, other considerations came into play.  For example, LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER,THAT STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, is a natural as Pinocchio.  Playing the role of a puppet comes naturally to LAPDOG, who daily serves as the puppet of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN over in Kangaroo Courtroom No. 1 at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station.

After all the dust had settled, LAPDOG COLLIER won out and landed lead role and will be starring in the production of Pinocchio.  DINO HOLMAN, of course, landed the primary supporting role of Geppetto.  Given the fact that HOLMAN has pulled LAPDOG COLLIER'S strings for years, and has so successfully manipulated LAPDOG COLLIER to dance to his tune, HOLMAN had no serious competition for the role.


MEDINA ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, although initially disappointed by his elimination for the lead role in Pinocchio, rebounded when he won the lead role in another production, to be presented later in the year.

SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, has won the lead role in the theatrical adaptation of C.S. Forrester's novel  The Happy Return.


Apparently, however, rehearsals for the production of The Happy Return have not been going well, as evidenced by this report from a local gossip column:

The local chatter is that the first rehearsal has not gone well for fledgling actor Medina County Assistant Prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY, who has won the lead role in the adaptation of C.S.Forester's novel "The Happy Return." SALISBURY plays the leading role of FELLATIO HORNBLOWER, the younger brother of Captain Horatio Hornblower. In his role, FELLATIO, an Admiralty Officer, is responsible for handling the discharge of semen from the British Royal Navy. FELLATIO drew sharp criticism after he blew several of his lines. One irritated cast member, speaking of SALISBURY'S stumbling first attempt, was overheard to say, "THAT'S NOT ALL THAT SALISBURY BLOWS!"

SO GOES THE LATEST SCOOP IN THE WORLD OF MEDINA COUNTY CULTURAL NEWS AND EVENTS


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, KEEPS HIS SOLEMN VOW TO SALISBURY, "I'LL HELP YOU!"

COMPLETELY CORRUPT LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRIS COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, has kept his solemn vow to Ass. Prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, WHEN HE AGREED TO RAILROAD THE INNOCENT MAN WHOSE CASE IS PROFILED AT THIS BLOG.


LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR AND ANOTHER STUPID CRIMINAL, are so accustomed to violating the United States Constitution, the Rules of Evidence, and the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct, they have become very casual and downright careless as they conspire to violate the rights of innocent citizens whom they railroad into prison.


To cite but one example, LAPDOG COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR met in LAPDOG'S chambers in an ex parte meeting (BANNED BY THE OHIO CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT) and conspired to lay out a plan to defeat the meritorious post-conviction motions filed by this Defendant's defense counsel.


While the Defense Counsel waited in the Kangaroo Courtroom No. 1 operated by LAPDOG COLLIER AND HIS CRIMINAL ACCOMPLICES, LAPDOG AND SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, were discussing the motions to be "heard" momentarily in Kangaroo Courtroom No. 1.


LAPDOG COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR,  were discussing the unlawfully compelled testimony of the defendant's wife at trial by LAPDOG COLLIER,  following a sham hearing on the morning of the first day of trial.


During the ex parte conversation between LAPDOG COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, which could be heard out into the Kangaroo Courtroom No. 1, LAPDOG COLLIER stated to SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, "YOU COMPELLED HER TO TESTIFY," referring to the unlawfully compelled testimony of DEFENDANT'S WIFE.


LAPDOG COLLIER THEN QUICKLY ADDED, "BUT I'LL HELP YOU!"


It is worthy, at this juncture, to consider the LAW and the OHIO RULES OF EVIDENCE.


OHIO RULES OF EVIDENCE,  RULE 601 EXPRESSLY PROVIDES:

RULE 601. General Rule of Competency
Every person is competent to be a witness except:

(A) Those of unsound mind, and children under ten years of age, who appear incapable of receiving just impressions of the facts and transactions respecting which they are examined, or of relating them truly.

(B) A spouse testifying against the other spouse charged with a crime except when either of the following applies:

(1)    a crime against the testifying spouse or a child of either spouse is charged;

(2)    the testifying spouse elects to testify

As to the Defendant whose case is being profiled at this blog, here are the following FACTS:


1)  This defendant was not charged with any crime involving his wife or children:

2)  This defendant's wife asserted her spousal privilege on no fewer than FOUR OCCASIONS.


3)  LAPDOG COLLIER COMPELLED THIS DEFENDANT'S WIFE TO TESTIFY, IN SPITE OF THE LAW, THE RULES OF EVIDENCE, AND THE UNABIGUOUS ASSERTION OF THE SPOUSAL PRIVILEGE.


LAPDOG COLLIER, THE STUPID CRIMINAL, VIOLATED THE LAW AND RULES OF EVIDENCE SOLELY TO PRESERVE HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME POLITICAL APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH, COMPLIMENTS OF HIS MASTER, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DEM PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEM PARTY.


THE OHIO CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT , CANON 3(B)(7) EXPRESSLY PROVIDES:

A judge shall not initiate, receive, permit, or consider communications made to the judge outside the presence of the parties or their representatives concerning a pending or impending proceeding .

IT IS CLEAR THAT COLLIER REGULARLY AND ROUTINELY VIOLATES THE LAW AND THE OHIO CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT IN HIS OWN SELF-INTEREST!

FOLLOWING IS SWORN PROOF OF LAPDOG COLLIER'S UNLAWFUL CONDUCT IN THIS, ONE OF MANY INSTANCES:

THIS IS JUST ONE MORE PROOF TO JUSTIFY AND INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WITH A VIEW TOWARD SWEEPING ALL OF THESE SLEAZY ATTORNEYS, LIKE LAPDOG COLLIER, FROM THE HALLOWED HALLS OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

CORRUPT OHIO JUDGES LIKE LAPDOG COLLIER ARE DROPPING LIKE FLIES!

It's about time!  Suddenly, a spate of corrupt Ohio judges seem to be facing some measure of justice, themselves.  They are starting to drop like flies.

From a recent article appearing in the Springfield Sun News:

SPRINGFIELD — Some say it proves he’s tough on crime while others say it provides a glimpse of a judge whose personal views interfere with his ability to follow the law.
The six-count complaint made public Tuesday accuses Clark County Common Pleas Court Judge Douglas Rastatter of judicial misconduct that includes claims that he failed to follow the law, failed to uphold the integrity of the judiciary, engaged in prejudicial conduct and acted in a manner that does not promote confidence in the judiciary.

Clark County Common Pleas Judge Doug Rastatter of Springfield, Ohio has been charged by the Disciplinary Counsel of the Ohio Supreme Court with some of the various violations in which LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, HAS ENGAGED FOR MANY YEARS:


1)  LAPDOG COLLIER, like Ratstatter, has consistently failed to follow the law as he preserves his uncontested grip on his political appointment to the Medina County Court, compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and the Medina County Dem party.


2)  Most certainly, LAPDOG COLLIER has failed to uphold the integrity of the judiciary.  In fact, LAPDOG COLLIER has consistently demonstrated that he lacks any scintilla of integrity.


3)  LAPDOG COLLIER daily engages in prejudicial conduct, solely for the purpose of preserving his uncontested grip on his political appointment to the Medina County Court, compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and the Medina County Dem party. 


4)  Finally, LAPDOG COLLIER has quite clearly acted in a manner that completely destroys any confidence in the judiciary one might have otherwise had.


THE ABOVE IS JUST A SMALL LIST OF INFRACTIONS DESCRIBING THE UNETHICAL AND UNLAWFUL CONDUCT IN WHICH LAPDOG COLLIER HAS ENGAGED. 


Most certainly, WHEN LAPDOG COLLIER TAMPERS WITH "OFFICIAL" TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS, AS IN THE CASE PROFILED AT THIS BLOG, LAPDOG COLLIER engenders nothing but COMPLETE CONTEMPT for the Medina County Judiciary.


The article goes on:

The complaint includes claims that Rastatter repeatedly failed to follow the law or showed bias toward defense counsel and defendants that later led to reversals of his decisions by the 2nd District Court of Appeals.

LAPDOG COLLIER, WILL NEVER BE ACCUSED OF DISPLAYING ANY FAVORABLE TREATMENT OF DEFENDANTS IN HIS KANGAROO COURTROOM AND, LIKE RATSTATTER, HAS BEEN AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE REVERSED BY THE COURT OF APPEALS BECAUSE OF HIS DELIBERATELY ERRANT RULINGS INTENDED TO CONVICT INNOCENT MEDINA COUNTY CITIZENS.  [See prior posts at this blog, captioned LAPDOG COLLIER DOESN'T TAKE CORRECTION FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/08/lapdog-collier-doesnt-take-correction.html ; and 9th DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS: "(COLLIER) SHOULD NOT HAVE LET (SALISBURY) GET AWAY WITH IT!" at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/09/9th-district-court-of-appeals-collier.html ]


According to the article, retired judge James Brogan commented of Ratstatter:

“If he’s disciplined, he won’t be the first judge and he won’t be the last."

JUDGE BROGAN IS CERTAINLY RIGHT ON THAT ACCOUNT.  READERS CAN BE ASSURED THAT LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, IS MOST ASSUREDLY ON THAT LIST!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

CAN LAPDOG COLLIER TAKE A HINT FROM ANOTHER CORRUPT JUDGE ?

The following is a recent headline taken from the online edition of  The Athens NEWS:

Meigs judge cites health reasons for exit, despite high court probe

The article goes on to report that the less-than-honorable Fred Crow, a corrupt judge from Meigs County has announced his "retirement" for "health reasons' following the disclosure that he is being investigated by the Disciplinary Commission of the Ohio State Supreme Court.

While the article does not provide any information as to the basis of the Supreme Court Investigation, there is as suggestion the Crow may have been involved with certain matters leading to financial irregularities.  The entire article can be found at http://www.athensnews.com/ohio/article-35344-meigs-judge-cites-health-reasons-for-exit-despite-high-court-probe.html

There is  currently no publicly available information that Crow violated the law, unlike LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.

There is no publicly available information the Crow deliberately withheld exculpatory evidence from defendants, which is a crime, unlike LAPDOG COLLIER, WHO INTENTIONALLY WITHHELD EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE SPECIFICALLY DEMANDED BY THIS DEFENDANT AT TRIAL.  COLLIER'S CONDUCT IN THAT REGARD CONSTITUTES A FELONY OFFENSE,

SPECIFICALLY TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, A FELONY OF THE THIRD DEGREE.

There is no publicly available information that Crow tampered with a trial transcript, which is also a crime, unlike LAPDOG  MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, WHO TAMPERED WITH, ALTERED, AND AMENDED THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT IN THE MATTER BEING PROFILED AT THIS BLOG.  THAT CONDUCT BY LAPDOG COLLIER CONSTITUTES THE OFFENSE OF TAMPERING WITH RECORDS, ALSO A FELONY OF THE THIRD DEGREE!  [ See prior posts at this blog, captioned 

LAPDOG COLLIER TRIED TO CONCEAL HIS UNLAWFUL CONDUCT AND BIASED RULINGS FROM THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, found at  http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/10/lapdog-collier-tried-to-conceal-his.html ; and also JUST HOW MANY TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS HAVE LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER & HIS CRONIES TAMPERED WITH AND CHANGED OVER THE YEARS?, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/10/just-how-many-trial-transcripts-have.html ]

It has been noted that following the public disclosure at this blog that LAPDOG COLLIER HAD TAMPERED WITH THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT, he kept a very low profile and appears to have lost a significant amount of weight.  Readers can be assured that LAPDOG COLLIER'S weight loss is not attributable to diet and exercise.   [See prior post at this blog, captioned 

LAPDOG COLLIER IS BACK & RAILROADING MORE INNOCENT CITIZENS AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/10/lapdog-collier-is-back-railroading-more.html ; and CHIEF JUSTICE OF SUPREME COURT VISITS THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/10/chief-justice-of-supreme-court-visits.html ]

SIMPLY PUT, COLLIER HAS BEEN CAUGHT RED-HANDED !!!

The question which now remains unanswered is PRECISELY WHEN WILL LAPDOG COLLIER RESIGN FOR "HEALTH" REASONS?

WILL LAPDOG COLLIER RESIGN AS A RESULT OF THE INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY THE DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION OF THE OHIO SUPREME COURT? [ See prior post, captioned OHIO SUPREME COURT TO PROBE COLLIER, HOLMAN, SALISBURY IN INVESTIGATION OF CORRUPTION IN MEDINA COUNTY COURTS, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/03/ohio-supreme-court-to-probe-collier.html ]

OR WILL LAPDOG COLLIER HOLD ON AND RIDE IT OUT UNTIL HE IS INDICTED BY A FEDERAL GRAND JURY?

COLLIER MIGHT JUST WANT TO TAKE A HINT FROM CROW AND RESIGN SOONER RATHER THAN LATER.  IF HE DOES SO NOW, HE'LL BE EATING A LOT LESS CROW LATER!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

MEDINA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REWARD LAPDOG COLLIER'S SERVICE TO THE KKK

Regular readers of this blog may well remember that LAPDOG COLLIER has been feted and awarded a significant award for his zeal in promoting the agenda of the Medina County Chapter of the Knights of the Klu Klux Klan at a recent annual Medina County Klan Bake.


Given the fact that Medina County has been the seat of the Klan in Ohio, LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOIWN WHORE, is credited with formulating the current slogan for the Medina Chapter of the Klan: "MEDINA! WHERE IT ALL BEGAN FOR THE KLAN!"


Readers may wish to refresh by reading a prior post at this blog, captioned HOLMAN, COLLIER TO BE KNIGHTED AT KLAN BAKE!  found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/holman-collier-to-be-knighted.html .

In tribute to LAPDOG COLLIER and his outstanding accomplishments and achievements ON BEHALF OF THE KLAN, and having been granted a lifetime uncontested appointment to the Kangaroo Court of Medina County as a result, the Medina County Commissioners have approved the publication of a new and unique seal to be emblazoned on the courtroom doors in the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station, shown below:

LAPDOG COLLIER MUST SURELY BE PROUD THAT ALL OF HIS EFFORTS HAVE FINALLY BEEN RECOGNIZED AND REWARDED BY HIS LOYAL SUPPORTERS AND CRONIES.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG COLLIER IS BACK & RAILROADING MORE INNOCENT CITIZENS AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION

The blogger finds it interesting to note that about the time that this blog exposed that the "official" transcript of the "trial" being profiled at this blog had been TAMPERED WITH, ALTERED, AND AMENDED, ALL FOR THE UNLAWFUL PURPOSE OF DEPRIVING THIS DEFENDANT OF A FAIR HEARING ON HIS APPEAL, LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, JUST SEEMED TO DISAPPEAR.


Readers may wish to refresh by viewing a prior post at this blog, captioned TAMPERING WITH THE TRIAL RECORD !!! found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/08/tampering-with-trial-record.html


LAPDOG COLLIER was apparently on hiatus for unexplained reasons!

The best guess?  LAPDOG COLLIER realized he had been found out and there is no way out of this for him now!


Perhaps LAPDOG COLLIER is/was suffering from a case of "nerves."  That is certainly understandable, since he is now facing the very real likelihood that he will be indicted, convicted, and sentenced to prison for his undeniable unlawful conduct!


Then again, LAPDOG COLLIER just needed some time away from his usual and customary routine of railroading innocent Medina County Citizens by depriving them of the Constitutional Rights, the Rule of Law, and generally railroading those same innocent citizens.


Of course, there is always the possibility that LAPDOG COLLIER JUST NEEDED MORE TIME TO TAMPER WITH, ALTER, AND AMEND THE TRANSCRIPTS IN OTHER PROCEEDINGS IN WHICH HE PREVIOUSLY RAILROADED INNOCENT MEDINA CITIZENS.


NO MATTER, LAPDOG COLLIER IS NOT WEARING WELL UNDER THE PRESSURE OF KNOWING THAT HIS LEGAL CAREER IS RAPIDLY DRAWING TO A CLOSE.  HE SEEMS TO HAVE LOST A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF BODY WEIGHT, AND YOU CAN BE SURE THAT THE WEIGHT LOSS DID NOT RESULT FROM DIETING AND EXERCISE.


Soon, the only thing that LAPDOG COLLIER will be judging is his chances of survival among other inmates at the penitentiary, who will certainly be overjoyed to welcome a corrupt judge among them, particularly a corrupt judge convicted of crimes related to depriving defendants of their constitutional rights and railroading innocent citizens into the penitentiary.


Oh, to be a fly on the wall at that reception!!!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

CHIEF JUSTICE OF SUPREME COURT VISITS THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION

George Spudnutt's Medina Gasette just published an article, with an accompanying photograph, reporting that the Honorable Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor recently visited the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station.

According to the article, the Chief Justice of the Ohio Supreme Court "wants to spend considerable time visiting Ohio's 88 counties to help her re-examine the administration of justice in Ohio."

The article can be found at http://medinagazette.northcoastnow.com/2011/03/30/medina-bar-association-meets-with-high-court-justice/

In assessing the quality of the "administration of justice" in Ohio, the Chief Justice wanted to start at the bottom of the barrel, which is why Medina County was the first stop on her statewide tour.


Immediately below is a photograph, appearing in the Medina Gasette:

You will note that LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, IS STANDING BESIDE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TO HER IMMEDIATE LEFT.


It appears, from the photograph, that LAPDOG COLLIER has lost some weight.  


WORRYING ABOUT HIS FUTURE LIFE IN THE CUSTODY OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS DOES SEEM TO HAVE HAD AN EFFECT ON LAPDOG COLLIER.


In reality, LAPDOG COLLIER was cozying up to the Chief Justice so that she remembers him when he appeals his own conviction, arising from his unlawful conduct on the Medina County Bench.


IN FACT, THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAY VERY WELL HAVE PERSONALLY VISITED THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION TO ASSESS FOR HERSELF THE DEPTH OF CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTICE SYSTEM."


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

HAVE THEY ALL "LAWYERED UP" AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION?

It would certainly seem that the political hacks over at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station have all "LAWYERED UP," and wisely so.  They certainly don't want to be deprived of their constitutional rights after all, like they deprive local citizens of their constitutional rights.


Readers may recall that it has already been brought to the fore that LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, has recused himself in another matter involving a  burglary case, likely upon the advice of retained legal counsel.  LAPDOG COLLIER is just not bright enough to have taken such action on his own initiative. Then again, LAPDOG COLLIER has gotten away with his corrupt practices for so many years, he mistakenly believes that he is bullet proof. It would certainly take the advice from his own attorney to advise him otherwise, and to bring LAPDOG back to reality.  [See previous post captioned LAPDOG COLLIER HEARS FOOTSTEPS, SEEKS LEGAL ADVICE!  found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/09/lapdog-collier-hears-footsteps-seeks.html ]


The most telling fact, however, comes from Medina Ass. prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.  SALISBURY, who has amply demonstrated that he is an obnoxious ignoramus at best, had been in the habit, until quite recently, of sending messages to this blog on a daily basis.  SALISBURY frequently sent multiple messages daily, particularly after he had imbibed one too many Shirley Temples.


As of late, however, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, has been mysteriously silent.
Recently, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, has refrained from sending to the blog his typical crude, vile, and racist messages on a daily basis.  Perhaps one reason is that some of his more colorful messages bearing upon his views of minority citizens and his assessment of the value of the United States Constitution have been included in legal briefs submitted by Defense Counsel to the visiting judge now considering the Defendant's Petition for Post-Conviction Relief.

Just like LAPDOG COLLIER, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, ISN'T BRIGHT ENOUGH TO KNOW WHEN TO JUST KEEP QUIET!


No doubt, he was instructed by his own retained legal counsel to stop with his incriminating remarks.  Understandably, SALISBURY'S attorney recognizes that SALISBURY, A CO-CONSPIRATOR OF COLLIER AND HOLMAN IN THE UNETHICAL AND UNLAWFUL CONDUCT THAT PERVADES THE MEDINA COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, IS FACING VERY REAL EXPOSURE ARISING FROM HIS OWN MISCONDUCT.


Even Daniel Webster wouldn't be able to relieve these scofflaws over at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station from their liability.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....