IT SEEMS AS THOUGH SOMEONE OR SOMEONES OVER AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION HAS/HAVE TAMPERED WITH THE TRIAL RECORD IN THE MATTER OF THE CASE BEING PROFILED HERE AT THE BLOG.
THIS IS CERTAINLY AN INTERESTING DEVELOPMENT AND INDICATIVE OF THE LEVEL OF COMPLETE CORRUPTION TO BE FOUND IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.
Firstly, it is significant to take note of the fact that LAPDOG COLLIER appointed an attorney, different from the Defendant's trial attorney, to represent the Defendant in his Direct Appeal.
Logically, as LAPDOG COLLIER'S thought process went, the trial transcript would not likely be reviewed by the Defendant's trial counsel. LAPDOG COLLIER was completely incorrect in that assessment.
Secondly, it took the court reporter 13 months following the conclusion of Defendant's trial to file the trial transcripts with the Court of Appeals, having requested and been granted no fewer that 8 extensions of time to complete and file the trial transcript. However, the court reporter managed to file no fewer than 7 transcripts of hearings and full trials with the Court of Appeals, all heard after the conclusion of the Defendant's trial!
LAPDOG COLLIER, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, and CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN MUST BE SLOW READERS!
IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THE DELAY IN FILING THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS WAS DUE TO THE TIME NEEDED BY LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN, AND SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, TO PROOF-READ, EDIT, AND DOCTOR THE TRANSCRIPTS?
MAYBE SO !
What LAPDOG COLLIER, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AND CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN did not accurately predict was that the Defendant's trial counsel and her investigator would READ the trial transcripts.
As it turns out, there are some glaring omissions in the trial record. Inappropriate comments made by LAPDOG COLLIER during the proceedings, but well remembered by witnesses, are not to be found in the transcript. Also, challenges made by witnesses to SALISBURY'S honesty and integrity, or more appropriately the lack thereof, offered in trial testimony are mysteriously missing from the record.
The blogger fully understands how a court reporter may miss some of the commentary during heated exchanges in court.
Yet, what is particularly puzzling is that there are gaps in witness testimony that go directly to issues raised by the Defendant on appeal, witness testimony and comments from LAPDOG COLLIER which prove unequivocally that LAPDOG COLLIER DEPRIVED THIS DEFENDANT OF A FAIR TRIAL.
Who could possibly benefit from these omissions from the trial transcripts? Certainly not the Defendant!
It is rather curious that the gaps in the trial transcripts seem to align with issues of improprieties submitted to LAPDOG COLLIER in a defense brief filed in it's Motion for a New Trial, found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=77
Given the fact that the trial transcript is clearly neither accurate nor complete, Defendant's trial counsel filed a Motion to Correct Transcripts, setting out in detail deficiencies in the transcript that are currently known. The Motion to Correct Transcripts can be found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=122
Further, tampering with and altering the trial record is just one more felony offense, TAMPERING WITH RECORDS, in violation of Section 2913.42(A) of the Ohio Revised Code, a FELONY OF THE THIRD DEGREE.
Section 2913.42, Tampering With Records, provides:
(A) No person, knowing the person has no privilege to do so, and with purpose to defraud or knowing that the person is facilitating a fraud, shall do any of the following:
(1) Falsify, destroy, remove, conceal, alter, deface, or mutilate any writing, computer software, data, or record;
(2) Utter any writing or record, knowing it to have been tampered with as provided in division (A)(1) of this section.
(B)(1) Whoever violates this section is guilty of tampering with records.
(2) Except as provided in division (B)(4) of this section, if the offense does not involve data or computer software, tampering with records is whichever of the following is applicable:
(4) If the writing, data, computer software, or record is kept by or belongs to a local, state, or federal governmental entity, a felony of the third degree.
IT MAY REQUIRE INQUIRY BY THE FEDERAL GRAND JURY, BUT THIS "MYSTERY" WILL BE SOLVED, IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE.
The criminals, and stupid criminals at that, over at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station, the "guardians" of the public safety, seem to racking up quite a collection of felony offenses themselves, although as yet unindicted.
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT THAT THE CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS MUST BE ADDRESSED BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE !
MUCH MORE TO COME ....
No comments:
Post a Comment