WHAT HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, ANOTHER STUPID CRIMINAL, IS TRYING TO CONCEAL FROM THE PUBLIC: ISSUE #5 - CONCEALING EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE

Newby Kern makes the outlandish denial that MEDINA ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR and LAPDOG COLLIER, TWO EQUALLY STUPID CRIMINALS, have withheld EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE FROM THIS INNOCENT DEFENDANT.


HOLMAN THE CORRUPT and LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, TWO PARTNERS IN CRIME (LITERALLY),  just can't stand to reveal the longstanding and customary practice of withholding exculpatory evidence for persons accused of criminal offenses.

           The Medina County Prosecutor Deliberately Withheld Exculpatory Evidence, Identified and Demanded by Petitioner, Thus Violating the Laws of the State of Ohio, Specifically ORC §2921.12(A)(1), Tampering With Evidence, a Felony of the Third Degree.

            At the suppression hearing, Deputy Douglas Clinage testified that he took photographs of the purported “injuries” to Petitioner’s wife at the scene of the purported incident that led to Petitioner’s arrest. (Tr. Supp. Hearing at 226).  Clinage further testified that he took an “oral statement” from Roy “Al” Leighton “two days later,” specifically on May 29, 2009.  (Tr. Supp. Hearing at 256.)

            Prior to trial, defense counsel viewed some, but not all, of the evidence in this case at the Medina County Sheriff’s Office.  Ms. Beth Klinecht, the evidence custodian, reported that Medina County Assistant Prosecutor instructed her to deny access to certain items of the evidence, specifically the photographs of the purported “injuries” of Petitioner’s wife, the micro cassette recording of the taped “oral” statement of Roy “Al” Leighton taken by Deputy Douglas Clinage on May 29, 2009, and the audiotape of the dispatch 911 call. (Tr. Supp. At 88-89) 

            During the evidence view, Ms. Klinecht produced a copy of the evidence log upon which Ms. Klinecht placed asterisks beside the items that Salisbury instructed her to withhold from defense counsel. (Tr. at 723-724.)

            Defense counsel’s investigator photographed the two-page evidence log.  A copy of the photograph of the Medina County Sheriff’s evidence log, displayed to defense counsel and her investigator prior to trial, and previously attached to Petitioner’s Reply to State’s Opposition to Correct the Record; Opposition to Disqualify Petitioner’s Counsel, filed on September 8, 2011, is appended hereto as Exhibit 12.

            Defense counsel filed her Rule 16 Discovery Demand on June 29, 2009.  Included among the discovery sought, and expressly requested, were:

“Any…photographs…recordings… available to or within the custody or control of the State, which are material to the preparation of the defense….” 

“All evidence known, or by exercise of due diligence may become known, to the prosecuting attorney, favorable to the Defendant, or discrediting to the State’s case (“Brady Material,” as defined in Brady v Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny), and material to either guilt or punishment, specifically including, not limited to the following: …

5.         The existence and identification of each occasion on which each State witness has testified to, or otherwise provided as statement, or narrative purporting to describe the facts of this case, whether oral, transcribed, recorded, written, reported, or summarized, together with copies of all such testimony, transcripts, recordings, statements, narratives, reports, or written summaries of oral statement;

7.         Any executed or unexecuted written, tape recorded or summarized oral statement(s) of whatever kind and description in the possession, custody, or control of the State, its agents, or the prosecuting attorney, made by or obtained from any person regarding the incident at issue;

8.         All other mitigating and/or exculpatory materials.

            The prosecutor refused to turn over the requested exculpatory evidence.  Accordingly, on July 27, 2009, defense counsel failed Defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery; and Renewed Motion for a Bill of Particulars.  Salisbury filed no opposition to Petitioner’s Motion to Compel.  The trial court did not rule on the Motion to Compel and failed to compel the prosecutor to turn over the exculpatory evidence.

            At the close of the September 4, 2009 segment of the four-part suppression hearing, defense counsel discussed discovery issues with the trial court. (Tr. Supp. Hearing at 123.)  Defense counsel informed the trial court that she had received exculpatory information from Roy “Al” Leighton and specifically requested the tape-recorded interview of Mr. Leighton be turned over to the defense, further stating her belief that Salisbury was withholding Brady material.  (Tr. Supp. Hearing at 124-125.)  Salisbury stated to the Court, “… I don’t want to give her the tape.”  Salisbury then turned over the audiotape of the May 29, 2009 interview of Roy “Al” Leighton to the trial judge.  (Tr. Supp. Hearing at 143.)

            Defense counsel then brought the matter of the photographs of the Petitioner’s wife, taken by Deputy Clinage at the scene of the purported incident, to the attention of the trial court.  Salisbury denied he had any such photographs, even though they were specifically itemized on the report of Deputy Clinage.  (Tr. Supp. Hearing at 145.)

            Petitioner’s counsel then informed the trial judge that the Sheriff’s evidence custodian had been instructed to refuse to turn over the photographs of the purported “injuries,” allegedly sustained by petitioner’s wife, to defense counsel.  (Tr. Supp. Hearing at 145.)

            The trial judge then instructed Salisbury, “But if you’ve got pictures, give them pictures.”  (Tr. Supp. Hearing at 146.)  Shortly thereafter, the trial judge addressed Salisbury, “If you’ve got photographs, make a reasonable effort to find those photographs.  If you do, you have got to give them to me. I’ll take a look and see if they’re exculpatory.”  (Tr. Supp. Hearing at 148.)

            Salisbury later informed the trial judge that he had been informed by Deputy Clinage that Clinage had taken photographs of Petitioner’s wife at the scene.  Salisbury then added, “I will provide that.” (Tr. Supp. Hearing at 154-155.)

            Further, given the Salisbury’s refusal to turn over the exculpatory evidence, on September 24, 2009, defense counsel filed Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why the Assistant Prosecutor Should Not Be Held In Contempt of Court and Subject to Sanctions, incorporating by reference Petitioner’s prior discovery demands.  Salisbury filed no opposition to Petitioner’s Motion to Show Cause.  Once again, the trial court failed to rule on the motion, and failed to compel Salisbury to turn over the exculpatory evidence.  (Tr. Supp. Hearing at 160.)  The trial judge never addressed the Motion to Show Cause.

            In pretrial discussion of the Motions in limine, held on November 9, 2009, defense counsel reiterated to the trial judge, “we still have not seen those photographs” or the audio tape of the May 29, 2009 interview of Roy “Al” Leighton.  (Tr. Pretrial at 13-14.)

            The trial judge agreed to review the audio taped interview of Roy “Al” Leighton and make it available to defense counsel prior to the cross-examination of Mr. Leighton.  Salisbury stated that he had turned over the audiotape to the trial judge.  (Tr. Pretrial at 14).

            The trial judge, despite his earlier assurances to defense counsel that he would “give (defense counsel) an opportunity” to review the audio cassette tape of the oral statement given by Roy “Al” Leighton to sheriff’s deputies on May 29, 2009, refused to turn over the audio tape at trial.  (Tr. Pretrial at 14; Tr. at 344-346.)  During a sidebar conference at trial, Defense counsel once again informed the trial judge that the defense still had not been provided production of the exculpatory photographs.  (Tr. at 347.)

The trial judge never made the audiotape of the oral statement given by Roy “Al” Leighton or the requested photographs available to the defense, at trial or at any other time.       

At trial, Kimberly Leighton falsely testified that, when Petitioner’s wife Melissa arrived at her home, Melissa “had marks.  It appeared to me that somebody grabbed her by the neck.”  (Tr. at 272.)  Petitioner’s wife disputes the testimony of Kimberly Leighton and denies that there were “marks” around her neck, suggestive of choking, as Ms. Leighton insinuated.

The photographs of Petitioner’ s wife, had they been turned over to the defense, would have refuted the testimony of Ms. Leighton concerning “marks” around the neck of Melissa, and would have affected the credibility of the entirety of her testimony.  The audiotape of the May 29, 2009 interview of Roy “Al” Leighton, had it been turned over to the defense, would have included statements of Mr. Leighton that Petitioner did not burglarize his home, and that Mr. Leighton did not wish to press criminal charges against Petitioner.

Neither the trial judge nor Salisbury ever turned over the exculpatory photographs or the exculpatory audiotape of the May 29, 2009 oral statement of Roy “Al” Leighton to the defense, at trial or at any other time.   By denying that the Office of the Medina County Prosecutor withheld exculpatory evidence from Petitioner, the prosecutor is now laying culpability for concealing and withholding this exculpatory evidence from Petitioner squarely at the feet of the trial judge, which may very well be true.

Despite his sweeping denials, the prosecutor has offered no countervailing evidence to dispute or challenge the record, which documents that Brady material was deliberately withheld from Petitioner.

ONCE AGAIN, NEWBY KERN HAS FAILED TO SUPPORT HIS SWEEPING DENIALS, WHICH HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO CREDIBILITY WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT ANY PROOF OR EVIDENCE.


THIS INNOCENT DEFENDANT HAS, HOWEVER, PRODUCED PROOF AND EVIDENCE THAT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, FACILITATED BY LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, HAS INDEED WITHHELD EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE FOR THIS INNOCENT DEFENDANT.  THE UNLAWFUL CONDUCT OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AND LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER CONSTITUTES MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OHIO, SPECIFICALLY TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, A FELONY OF THE THIRD DEGREE.


Regular readers of this blog may recall that, in a prior post, the blogger published an electronic message from SALISBURY , THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, who openly admitted that the Medina County Prosecutor's Office regularly withholds exculpatory evidence from defendants because the requirement to disclose such evidence in compliance with the Brady Rule, promulgated by the United States Supreme Court, "is almost impossible to enforce." 

Newby Kern offers no more than incredible sweeping denials that he is unable to support with any competent, credible evidence.

MICH MORE TO COME ....   

THE PLOT THICKENS AS LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THAT REALLY STUPID CRIMINAL, VIOLATES THE LAW...AGAIN!

In the prior post at this blog, readers were shown how LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THAT STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, impeded efforts by the defense to obtain the EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE that ASS PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY DELIBERATELY WITHHELD FROM THIS INNOCENT MAN, WHO LAPDOG COLLIER RAILROADED INTO PRISON.


LAPDOG COLLIER, of course, railroaded this innocent citizen, as he's railroaded countless other citizens, motivated only by his desire to preserve his uncontested lifetime political appointment to the Medina County bench, compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and the Medina County Dem Party.


As readers may recall from the prior post, LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, REFUSED TO COMPEL SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, TO TURN OVER THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, INCLUDING AN EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPED INTERVIEW OF THIS INNOCENT DEFENDANT'S FRIEND OF 20 YEARS, WHO TOLD KEYSTONE SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES THAT THIS INNOCENT DEFENDANT HAD NOT BURGLARIZED HIS HOME AND THAT HE DID NOT WISH TO PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES.


THE PLOT, HOWEVER, THICKENS AND DEMONSTRATES THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, VIOLATED THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OHIO AT TRIAL, SPECIFICALLY TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, A FELONY OFFENSE OF THE THIRD DEGREE!


THE SUBJECT ADDRESSED BELOW CONCERNS THE EXCULPATORY  AUDIO TAPE:


During one session of the four-part suppression hearing, defense counsel requested access to the exculpatory audio tape.  At Page 143 of the tainted transcript of the suppression hearing, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, turned over the exculpatory audio tape to LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER.


Pictured below is page 143 from the tainted transcript of the suppression hearing:

Readers will take note that, at Lines 14-15, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR states to LAPDOG COLLIER, "I'M GIVING YOU THE TAPE. HERE'S THE TAPE."


We now have LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THAT STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, in possession of the exculpatory audio tape!


Time marches on, but LAPDOG COLLIER has not made the exculpatory audio tape available to the defense.


On November 9, 2009, the morning of the first day of trial, defense counsel was discussing preliminary legal matter with LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, during a discussion of motions in limine.


During those preliminary discussions, before the jury is brought in to hear the testimony, defense counsel once again brought up the matter of the exculpatory evidence, including the exculpatory audio tape, in LAPDOG COLLIER'S POSSESSION.


A Page 14 of the tainted "official" transcript of the motions in limine, defense counsel once again raised the issue of the exculpatory audio tape, and requested LAPDOG COLLIER to conduct an in camera (in chambers) review of the contents of the exculpatory audio tape.  LAPDOG COLLIER, ever the puppet of HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, stated to defense counsel, as if he meant it, "I'll do that prior to cross (examination)."


Then, Ass Prosecutor SALISBURY stated to LAPDOG COLLIER, at Lines 14-15, "I have given that tape to you, Judge."


A copy of Page 14 from the tainted "official" transcript of the motions in limine is pictured below:

An extremely important comment from LAPDOG COLLIER is to be found at Lines 20-24, where the CORRUPT JUDGE says:

"I'll listen to Mr. Leighton's (audio-taped interview) tonight or tomorrow prior to any examination, and I'll give you an opportunity to - - then I'll seal it and give it to the court reporter - -"

NEEDLESS TO SAY, LAPDOG COLLIER NEVER MADE THE EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPE AVAILABLE TO THE DEFENSE AT TRIAL, OR AT ANY OTHER TIME!

Once again, we turn to the tainted "official" transcript of the proceedings, knowingly filed by MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY. 


Pictured below is Page 4 of the tainted "official" transcript, which identifies all of ASS SALISBURY'S PURPORTED EVIDENCE:

Looking at SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR'S marked evidence:


Item #1 - White evidence box that contained the .22 caliber single action western-style revolver,   seized UNLOADED from this innocent defendant when unlawfully arrested by the KEYSTONE COPS from the Medina County sheriff's office; one western-style gun belt and holster; and one pocket knife.


Item #2 - Bullets : .22 caliber rounds taken from the western-style gun belt.


Item #3 - Cassette tape of the recording of the 9-1-1 tape, in which ASS SALISBURY'S "key witness stated that she never saw this innocent defendant during the entirety of the purported incident, that was actually no incident at all.


FROM PAGE 4, SHOWN ABOVE, IT CAN BE CONCLUDED THAT:


1)  LAPDOG COLLIER NEVER PLACED THE EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPE IN A SEALED ENVELOPE;


2)  LAPDOG COLLIER NEVER TURNED THE EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPE OVER TO THE COURT REPORTER; AND


3)  LAPDOG COLLIER NOT ONLY WITHHELD THE EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPE FROM THE DEFENSE, BUT THAT HE WITHHELD IT FROM THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS SO AS TO CONCEAL FROM THE NINTH DISTRICT, THAT THE AUDIO TAPE WAS , INDEED, EXCULPATORY, AND THAT LAPDOG COLLIER UNLAWFULLY WITHHELD THE EXCULPATORY AUDIO TAPE FROM THE DEFENSE OF THIS INNOCENT MAN.


THIS IS MORE PROOF POSITIVE THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, A REALLY STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL, VIOLATED THE LAW, SPECIFICALLY TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, A FELONY OF THE THIRD DEGREE, WHEN HE CONCEALED THIS EVIDENCE.


LAPDOG COLLIER HAS PROVEN, ONCE AGAIN, THAT HE REALLY IS A STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL WHO DESERVES NOTHING LESS THAN MANY YEARS BEHIND PRISON BARS FOR HIS CRIMES!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

MORE PROOF OF THE CRIMINAL CONDUCT OF LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THAT STUPID COMMON CRIMINAL

One of the serious appellate and criminal issues arising from the corrupted trial of this innocent man who was railroaded into prison by LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, IS THE FACT THAT ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR AND LAPDOG COLLIER BOTH DELIBERATELY WITHHELD AND CONCEALED EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENDANT, FROM THE DEFENSE COUNSEL.


Defense counsel requested the May, 29, 2009, exculpatory audio-taped interview of the purported victim, this innocent defendant's friend of more than 20 years.  In his May 29 interview with sheriff's deputies DOUGLAS CLINAGE and FRANK TELATKO, the purported victim told these Keystone Deputies that this innocent citizen HAD NOT BURGLARIZED HIS HOME AND THAT HE DID NOT WANT TO PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES.


Defense Counsel's Discovery Request can be found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=14


Needless to say, those statements are favorable to the defendant, and are therefore exculpatory evidence.
ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR,  refused to turn over the exculpatory evidence, including the exculpatory audiotape.


Defense counsel and her investigator went to the Medina County Sheriff's Office to review the physical evidence. The sheriff's evidence control officer produced some, but not all of the physical evidence in this case.  The evidence control officer reported that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, had instructed her to withhold from defense counsel the following exculpatory evidence:
1)  The 9-1-1 dispatch tape of the purported incident;
2)  The exculpatory photographs of this defendant's wife, which do not depict injuries to this innocent defendant's wife, contrary to the perjured testimony of Salisbury's "key witness";
3)  The exculpatory audiotape of the May 29, 2009 interview of the purported victim, this innocent defendant's friend of more than 20 years.


During the evidence view, the evidence control officer produced an evidence control log, upon which she placed asterisks beside those items of exculpatory evidence that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, had forbidden her to present to defense counsel.


A COPY OF THE EVIDENCE CONTROL LOG, WITH OBVIOUS ASTERISKS, IS PICTURED BELOW:

Because SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, REFUSED TO TURN OVER THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, INCLUDING THE EXCULPATORY AUDIOTAPE, DEFENSE COUNSEL FILED A MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE.  


Defense counsel's Motion to Compel Discovery  can be found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=23


SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, filed no opposition to the Motion to Compel.
LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, simply ignored the defense Motion to Compel.  After all, LAPDOG COLLIER'S only allegiance is to HOLMAN THE CORRUPT so as to preserve his lifetime uncontested political appointment to the bench, compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and the Medina County Dem Party.


Failing to get the attention of either ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, or LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, defense counsel filed a Motion to Show Cause Why the Assistant Prosecutor Should Not Be Held in Contempt and Subject to Sanctions, which can be found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=53 .

Defense counsel's Motion to Show Cause really caused some consternation over at Kangaroo Courtroom No. 1 at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station.  LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, AND ASS PROSECUTOR SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR all huddled in LAPDOG'S CHAMBERS.


Following the impromptu forbidden ex parte huddle in LAPDOG'S CHAMBERS, LAPDOG COLLIER TOOK THE BENCH, PALE AND NERVOUS.  HOLMAN THE CORRUPT was in the courtroom, just to make sure that LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG," did the "right thing."


After taking the bench, LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER waved the Show Cause Motion in the air and stated, "I'M NOT GOING TO DEAL WITH THIS RIGHT NOW!"


LAPDOG COLLIER NEVER DID ADDRESS THE SHOW CAUSE MOTION, AND NEVER COMPELLED SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, TO TURN OVER THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE!


MUCH MORE ABOUT THIS MATTER IN THE NEXT POST ....

LAPDOG COLLIER'S CHRISTMAS WISH LIST

LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER,  THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, has his very own Christmas Wish List, tailored to meet the pressing demands of his responsibilities as the "PAVLOV DOG" of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.


#1 WISH, FOR TAMPERING WITH ALL OF THOSE PESKY TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS THAT, IF LEFT UNALTERED, WOULD DEMONSTRATE TO THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS JUST WHAT AN IGNORAMUS AND DIRTBALL HE REALLY IS, LAPDOG COLLIER WISHES FOR A FULL CASE OF  ERASERS!

#2 WISH ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S MOST-WANTED CHRISTMAS GIFT WISH LIST, TO BE USED FOR EXCISING AND CUTTING OUT WHOLE SECTIONS OF TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS IN ORDER TO DEPRIVE INNOCENT CITIZENS OF FAIR HEARING ON APPEAL, A NEW PAIR OF LONG LASTING TITANIUM SCISSORS, STRONG ENOUGH TO LAST THROUGH ONE FULL YEAR OF TRANSCRIPT TAMPERING!

#3 WISH ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S WISH LIST FOR THE UPCOMING CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY, TO OFFER HIM SOME RELIEF FROM HIS DAILY APPEARANCES BEFORE CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, LAPDOG COLLIER WISHES FOR A NEW PAIR OF REINFORCED INDUSTRIAL GRADE DOUBLE-STRENGTH KNEE PADS!


#4 WISH ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S WISH LIST, TO DESTROY ALL OF THAT EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE HE CONCEALS AND WITHHOLDS FROM INNOCENT DEFENDANTS, ALL FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF RAILROADING INNOCENT CITIZENS INTO PRISON SO AS TO PRESERVE HIS FIRM GRIP ON HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH, COMPLIMENTS OF CORRUPT MEDINA DEM PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEM PARTY, A BRAND NEW SUPER DUTY PAPER AND PHOTOGRAPH SHREDDER!

#5 WISH ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S 2011 CHRISTMAS WISH LIST, DESIRED FOR DISPOSING OF ALL THOSE DEFENSE BRIEFS HE REFUSES TO READ AND CONSIDER, AN OVERSIZED LAPDOG COLLIER "ROUND FILE!"

#6 WISH ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S WISH LIST, TO REMIND HIM OF MEDINA ASS. PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, WHEN SALISBURY IS NOT AROUND TO MEET EX PARTE IN LAPDOG COLLIER'S CHAMBERS TO ISSUE ORDERS, INSTRUCTIONS, AND RULINGS TO LAPDOG COLLIER, A SIMULATED LIFE-SIZED WEENIE!

#7 WISH ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S WISH LIST, SPECIFICALLY FOR PRESERVING HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH, A NEW TOOL KIT USED FOR "FIXING" CASES FOR CORRUPT MEDINA PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN!

#8 WISH ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S CHRISTMAS WISH LIST, TO BE USED FOR TABULATING ALL THE VOTES HE GETS IN HIS NEXT UNCONTESTED RIGGED MEDINA COUNTY ELECTION, COMPLIMENTS OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DEM PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEM PARTY,  AN UNOPPOSED VOTE TABULATING CALCULATOR!

#9 ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S WISH LIST, FOR LAPDOG COLLIER, DINO HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG," TO PRESENT TO ANY DEFENSE ATTORNEY SEEKING TO GO TO TRIAL IN LAPDOG COLLIER'S CORRUPT KANGAROO COURTROOM NO. 1, A PAIR OF LOADED DICE THAT ALWAYS COMES UP SNAKE EYES!

#10 WISH ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S WISH LIST IS THE PROMISE OF CORRUPT MEDINA DEM PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEM PARTY, IN EXCHANGE FOR SERVING IN TOTAL OBEDIENCE TO DINO HOLMAN, CONTRARY TO THE LAW AND THE RULES OF EVIDENCE, AN UNOPPOSED FOURTH TERM TO PERPETUATE HIS LIFETIME UNCONTESTED APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH!

#11 ON LAPDOG COLLIER'S WISH LIST, TO SATISFY HIS ALLEGIANCE TO THE MEDINA COUNTY KKK, ANOTHER INNOCENT MINORITY MEDINA COUNTY CITIZEN TO RAILROAD INTO PRISON!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

A READER ASKS, "HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THEY DESTROYED THE EVIDENCE?"

A reader of this blog has made the specific inquiry, "Just how do you know that the Medina County prosecutor destroyed the exculpatory evidence?"

That is a question properly asked, and well deserving of an answer.

As with all such matters presented at this blog, the blogger presents facts and evidence from which reasonable inference may be drawn.

THE BLOGGER HAS CONCLUDED THAT THE CRIMINALS OPERATING OVER IN COURTROOM NO. 1 AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION HAS DESTROYED THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE DELIBERATELY AND UNLAWFULLY WITHHELD FROM THE DEFENDANT WHOSE CASE IS PROFILED AT THIS BLOG BASED UPON THE VERY WORDS OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, IN AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE THAT SALISBURY HAS SENT TO THIS BLOG.


PRESENTED BELOW IS THE PRECISE LANGUAGE, TAKEN FROM THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR'S MESSAGE:

“And can you prove these illustrious prosectors (sic) withheld evidence?You do realize if the courts were really corrupt as you have said with FACT that you say they are . . . they would have simply destroyed all proof by now.  Because the courts are not really corrupt, and the evidence that [Defendant] is not the violent felon that nearly killed his family is not and never has been in existence.”  

SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, HAS UNEQUIVOCALLY ADMITTED THAT THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE IS NO LONGER IN EXISTENCE. 



THAT IS A MAJOR ADMISSION AGAINST THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR'S SELF-INTEREST, THANK GOODNESS.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

NOTICE HOW CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN SPINS HIS CORRUPT PRACTICES IN THE MANNER OF A "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

In a prior segment of this blog, the blogger pointed out the attempts of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN to explain away his misconduct by claiming that the aggrieved defendant had simply fabricated a "conspiracy theory."

As more than one case in point, the blogger points to HOLMAN'S brief in opposition to the appeal of Audrey Iacona.  Here is a direct quote from HOLMAN'S brief, expounding his disingenuous "conspiracy theory" in that case:

``Since February 23, 1998, when she filed her motion for a new trial,'' Holman writes, ``(Iacona) has advanced an elaborate conspiracy theory which alleges that the Medina County prosecutor and his assistant prosecutors were so intent on convicting her at trial that -- with the full cooperation of the Cuyahoga County coroner and her deputy coroners, the Summit County medical examiner, the Medina County coroner, Dr. (Mark) Collin and Dr. (Paul) Gatewood -- they deliberately withheld or concealed the . . . blood culture report of Baby Boy Iacona from the defense.'

Readers will note that CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN attempts to brush away his misconduct in that case by characterizing Ms. Iacona's claims, which are undoubtedly true, as nothing more than an "elaborate conspiracy theory."

Readers may wish to refresh by reading the prior post,  A TYPICAL CASE OF HOLMAN HIDING THE EVIDENCE, found at  http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/typical-case-of-holman-hiding-evidence.html

IN FACT, ASSISTANT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, IN AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE TO THIS BLOG, HAS OPENLY ADMITTED THAT THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE REGULARLY AND ROUTINELY WITHHOLD EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO A DEFENDANT, CONTRARY TO LAW!


In his electronic message to the blog, SALISBURY has expressly stated:

“While I understand Brady v Maryland (1963) says they must do this, it is almost impossible to enforce which is why the abuse has been going on.”   

Turning now to the case being profiled at this blog. wherein this Defendant was deliberately and unlawfully deprived of a fair trial by SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AND LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DINO HOLMAN once again tries to brush away the pattern of egregious misconduct by SALISBURY AND LAPDOG COLLIER when he writes, in his brief opposing this Defendant's Petition for Post-Conviction Relief:

            “Backed into a corner on the jurisdictional nature of the limitations period under Ohio law,  [Petitioner] reaches for unsupported allegations of some kind of grand conspiracy designed to ensnarl him.  First it was the trial prosecutor and the common pleas judge who oversaw the case.  Then when the jurisdictional issue on which the petition may be dismissed arose, [Petitioner] began asserting the court reported falsified the transcript.  After accusing the court reporter of misconduct, who is next?  If You Honor finds the petition untimely without exception, is the Court part of the alleged conspiracy.  Were the Court of Appeals to affirm his conviction, are they too “in” on some kind of agreement [Petitioner] believes was entered into?  From these shifting and evolving allegations, it is clear that the focus of the allegations is inextricably related to Petitioner's needs.”

THE SIMILARITY OF THE "ARGUMENTS" IS MORE THAN TELLING.

NOW THAT HOLMAN'S DISINGENUOUS "CONSPIRACY THEORY" DEFENSE HAS APPARENTLY FAILED HIM, HE'S TRYING, AS A MATTER OF SHEER DESPERATION, TO REMOVE JUDGE BROWN FROM HEARING THE PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF, PRESENTLY BEFORE JUDGE BROWN, AN HONORABLE JUDGE.

AS A MATTER OF FACT, THIS DEFENDANT AND HIS ATTORNEYS BELIEVE THAT JUDGE ROBERT BROWN IS AN HONEST AND HONORABLE MAN, GUIDED BY THE LAW AND THE RULES OF EVIDENCE,

THAT IS THE VERY REASON THAT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN  seeks to remove Judge Brown from hearing the Defendant's Petition for Post Conviction Relief!  


HOLMAN IS UNABLE TO INFLUENCE, MANIPULATE, AND CONTROL JUDGE BROWN AS HE DOES WITH LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, TOWN WHORE, AND HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG."

THE SIMPLE AND UNASSAILABLE FACT IS THE CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS CONSPIRE ON A DAILY BASIS WITH LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER, HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG," TO DEPRIVE CITIZENS OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, AND THE RULE OF LAW!

THE ODOR OF DESPERATION IS IN THE AIR AT COURTROOM NO. 1 AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION

CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN HAS ATTEMPTED, ONCE AGAIN, TO HIDE THE EVIDENCE AND THWART THE PROPER ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE!


Just what evidence, you may ask, is CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN trying to hide now?

HOLMAN IS NOW TRYING TO HIDE EVIDENCE THAT HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANT (AN APT CHARACTERIZATION) SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AND HIS UNDERLING, LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, WITH HOLMAN'S FULL APPROVAL, HAVE DESTROYED EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, THEY CONCEALED AND WITHHELD AT TRIAL, IN ATTEMPT TO SHIELD THESE CRIMINALS, WHO OPERATE IN COURTROOM NO.1, FROM THE SANCTIONS OF THE DISCIPLINARY OFFICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO!


BIG MISTAKE!!!


DINO HOLMAN is now trying to remove an honest and honorable retired , the Honorable Judge Robert Brown from Wayne County, from hearing this Defendant's Petition for Post Conviction Relief.


IN FACT, HOLMAN IS SO DESPERATE TO AVOID AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING, HE HAD ONE OF HIS NEWBY ATTORNEYS DRIVE ALL THE WAY TO COLUMBUS TO FILE HIS "AFFIDAVIT OF DISQUALIFICATION'' OF JUDGE BROWN THE VERY DAY BEFORE THE SCHEDULED HEARING!


Why would CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN want to do that, you may ask?


Well, first of all, Judge Brown is HONEST and HOLMAN JUST CAN'T STAND THAT FACT!


Secondly, HOLMAN has had a shocking and rude awakening when he discovered that he can't influence, manipulate, and control Judge Brown, LIKE HE DOES LAPDOG COLLIER.


HOLMAN JUST CAN'T HANDLE THE FACT THAT HE HAS TO OPERATE WITHIN A FAIR FORUM IN A COURTROOM UNDER THE CONTROL OF JUDGE BROWN.


SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, CAN'T RUN ROUGHSHOD OVER JUDGE BROWN, LIKE HE DOES WITH COLLIER, WHO IS NO MORE THAN A DUPE FOR HOLMAN!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....