ONE OF THEM BITES THE DUST, A FEW MORE TO GO AT THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE

HERE IS THE FIRST TO FALL AT THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE!


The following article was posted at the Cleveland Plain Dealer website, www. cleveland.com, on September 9, 2011.  A direct link to the article: http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2011/09/ohio_supreme_court_suspends_as.html

Ohio Supreme Court suspends assistant Medina County prosecutor's law license

Published: Friday, September 09, 2011, 2:31 PM     Updated: Saturday, September 10, 2011, 5:24 AM

By John Caniglia, The Plain Dealer 
Follow

ShareEmailPrint

View full sizeiStock photo

MEDINA, Ohio -- An assistant Medina County prosecutor had his law license suspended for six months for improperly notarizing signatures while in private practice and refusing to take responsibility for his actions.

The Ohio Supreme Court sanctioned Tom Karris for the misconduct, which took place years before he began representing the county.

Karris improperly notarized documents on three different occasions in 2000 and 2001, according to a ruling of the Ohio Supreme Court released last week. He went to work for Prosecutor Dean Holman's office in 2008, where he represented townships and the county in litigation. The state disciplinary counsel filed the complaint against Karris in December 2009.

"Since the time he has worked here, he has done an outstanding job for the residents of Medina County," Holman said. "This occurred nine years before the filing of the complaint and eight years before he came to work here."

Holman and Medina County Common Pleas Judge James Kimbler testified on behalf of Karris, "attesting to his integrity, excellent character and good reputation," the Supreme Court reported in its decision.

Holman said Karris will put together a list of cases that he had been working on. He stopped working as an attorney last week and Holman was unsure if Karris would return to the office.

Karris, who lives in Strongsville, could not be reached to comment on the suspension.

The Supreme Court's decision said Karris notarized documents twice in January 2000 and once in January 2001. The documents included a promissory note, a mortgage and quitclaim deed and a land contract. Each time, Karris notarized papers that said a man and his then-wife signed the documents.

Karris eventually became a third-party defendant in a lawsuit against the man. During the course of the case, questions arose as to who had signed the documents Karris notarized.

In the proceedings against Karris, the state disciplinary board heard conflicting accounts on whether the woman signed the records. The man and woman, who divorced in 2003, testified that the woman did not sign any of the documents. The man said he had signed her name, according to the Supreme Court's decision. He previously had said in an affidavit in another legal proceeding that she had signed two of the documents.

Karris testified that the woman had signed the records in his presence. One of Karris' other clients testified that he had been present when the man and woman signed the documents.

The Supreme Court's decision said a forensic document examiner for the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation testified that the signatures purporting to be the woman's were not hers. The examiner testified that there is "a high-degree of certainty" that the signatures were of her former husband, according to the board's decision.

"(Karris) improperly notarized documents on three separate occasions," the Supreme Court's report said. "He also steadfastly refused to acknowledge the wrongful nature of his conduct . . . even when confronted with forensic evidence" that the woman did not sign the documents.

SO, IT WOULD SEEM, THAT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN HIRES ONLY THOSE "ATTORNEYS" WITH A PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF PAST CORRUPT ACTIVITIES, LIKE FORGERY, PERJURY, TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, TAMPERING WITH RECORDS, ALL FELONY VIOLATIONS OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE.

Here's a quote from another online article from George Spudnutt's Medina Gasette, found at http://medinagazette.northcoastnow.com/2011/09/10/assistant-prosecutor-suspended/

Tom Karris, of Strongsville, was suspended Sept. 1 by the Ohio Supreme Court for six months. According to the court, there is “clear and convincing evidence that Karris engaged in dishonesty, fraud and deceit that adversely reflected on his ability to practice law by improperly notarizing documents on three separate occasions” in the early 2000s.

Readers may also wish to view reader comments to the Cleveland Plain Dealer online article at http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2011/09/ohio_supreme_court_suspends_as/691/comments.html 

KARRIS IS OBVIOUSLY HOLMAN'S KIND OF GUY, AND MEETS ALL HOLMAN'S REQUIREMENTS FOR EMPLOYMENT AT "HIS" OFFICE. 

While Kariss is obviously a liar, as found by the Supreme Court of Ohio, he certainly does not evidence conduct suggestive of being a PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, LIKE SCOTT SALISBURY!

The reader will take note or the fact that, according to the article, "Holman and Medina County Common Pleas Judge James Kimbler testified on behalf of Karris, "attesting to his integrity, excellent character and good reputation," the Supreme Court reported in its decision."


The complete Opinion of the Supreme Court of Ohio can be found here: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2011/2011-Ohio-4243.pdf

Now isn't that remarkable?  CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, THE NUMBER ONE PURVEYOR OF DISHONESTY IN THE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, TESTIFIED AS TO THE "INTEGRITY, EXCELLENT CHARACTER, AND GOOD REPUTATION" OF KARRIS!

THE ONE GLARING QUESTION REGARDING HOLMAN'S TESTIMONY REMAINS: IN COMPARISON TO WHOM AND TO WHAT?  IN COMPARISON TO HOLMAN, COLLIER, AND SALISBURY?


IF SO, ONE MIGHT CONSIDER THAT HOLMAN, COLLIER, AND SALISBURY MAY VERY WELL MAKE CHARLES MANSON LOOK LIKE A PARAGON OF VIRTUE!

THIS IS JUST ONE MORE BIT OF PROOF THAT MEDINA COUNTY NEEDS AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.  THE SOONER THE BETER!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

COLLIER IS NOT JUST HOLMAN'S LAPDOG, BUT HIS "PAVLOV DOG" AS WELL

Just what won't CORRUPT LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER do to preserve his hold on his lifetime, uncontested seat on the Medina County bench, compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DEAN HOLMAN and the Medina County Democrat party?


The answer to that question, of course, is just about anything, INCLUDING TAMPERING WITH, ALTERING, AND AMENDING A TRIAL RECORD, OR SO IT SEEMS!


Most, if not all readers are likely familiar with Pavlov's dogs.  Just to refresh, Pavlov was a social scientist who was testing the theory of stimulus and response.  Pavlov rand a bell, and thereafter fed his dogs, who were test subjects in his experiment.  After repeating this series of events, Pavlov rang the same bell, but withheld food, finding that the dogs began to salivate at the sound of the bell, even though food had been withheld.  This experiment validated Pavlov's theory that stimulus produces a predictable response.

If Pavlov were alive today, he would not have to use canines for his experiments.  He could easily confirm his theory by attending a kangaroo "trial" conducted by LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, TOWN WHORE, AND A "PAVLOV DOG" TRAINED BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.


Specifically, HOLMAN has trained LAPDOG COLLIER TO DENY EACH AND EVERY PROPERLY PLACED OBJECTION LODGE BY DEFENSE ATTORNEYS.


EVERY TIME DEFENSE COUNSEL VOICES "OBJECTION" AT TRIAL, LAPDOG COLLIER'S PAVLOVIAN RESPONSE IS "OVERRULED!"


Perhaps it is a worthwhile endeavor to examine the trial transcript in the case of the innocent citizen railroaded by LAPDOG COLLIER, at least the portion of the trial transcript that remains after it had been edited, tampered with, altered. and amended by the boys over at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station.


A review of the CORRUPTED "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT discloses that Defense Counsel voiced "OBJECTION" on no fewer than 40 occasions at trial, AND LAPDOG COLLIER OVERRULED (DENIED) EACH AND EVERY OF DEFENSE COUNSEL'S 40 OBJECTIONS.


Just so that the reader understands the implication of this fact, Defense Counsel raised each and every objection that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, VIOLATED THE OHIO RULES OF EVIDENCE. 


SO THIS FACT ALONE PROVES UNEQUIVOCALLY THAT LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG" COMPLETELY DISREGARDED THE RULES OF EVIDENCE AT TRIAL!!!


This, however, is but one side of the coin.

Whenever Defense Counsel asked a question that went to the truth of a matter, SALISBURY OBJECTED  ON THE BASIS THAT THE TRUTH WAS KILLING HIM.


Of course, LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG,"  certainly could not let the truth enter into the trial.  AFTER ALL, THE ONLY WAY THAT LAPDOG COLLIER PRESERVES HIS LIFETIME UNCONTESTED APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH IS TO ASSURE THAT HOLMAN AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS "WIN," NO MATTER HOW BADLY HE VIOLATES THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE DEFENDANT.


So, examining the other side of this coin, LAPDOG COLLIER SUSTAINED (GRANTED) NO FEWER THAN 52 OBJECTIONS LODGED BY SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AT TRIAL!


To give credit where credit is due, however, it is noted that LAPDOG COLLIER DID SUSTAIN (GRANT) 2 OBJECTIONS RAISED BY DEFENSE COUNSEL AT TRIAL!


In summation LAPDOG COLLIER OVERRULED NO FEWER THAN 40 DEFENSE OBJECTIONS AT TRIAL, BUT IN THE SPIRIT MAGNANIMITY, GRANTED THE DEFENSE ALL OF TWO OBJECTIONS!


It is certainly worth reviewing some of LAPDOG COLLIER'S "rulings" in order to evaluate the manner in which he mediates a trial, calling to mind LAPDOG COLLIER'S claim that it is his responsibility, as a "judge," to assure that trials are conducted fairly.  [See prior post captioned LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, PANDERS TO THE PUBLIC found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/07/lapdog-medina-judge-collier-village_25.html ]

COMPARE AND CONTRAST THE FOLLOWING "RULINGS" FROM LAPDOG COLLIER:


At pages 803 & 804, the defense investigator was testifying in the context of his law enforcement experience, prior to his retirement as a Federal law enforcement officer:

Defense Question:  Now when you would go on a raid or on an arrest, did you ever wear your holster across your shoulder, diagonally across your shoulder?

Witness:  No.  Not like an ammunition bandoleer, no.
Defense Question:  And why is that?
Witness:  Because you wanted to have the - - your firearm at the ready.  And, in fact - -
Salisbury:  Objection.
Witness:  - - particularly --
LAPDOG COLLIER:  I'm going to let him testify about this briefly.  Please go ahead, sir.
Witness:  Particularly on drug raids - - 
Salisbury:  Objection.
LAPDOG COLLIER:  I'm going to sustain the objection as to "DRUG RAID."  WE'RE NOT DEALING WITH A DRUG RAID HERE TODAY!

While LAPDOG COLLIER refused to permit innocuous testimony about the law enforcement experience of the defense investigator, TAKE A LOOK AT THE PREJUDICIAL QUESTIONS/REMARKS IMPERMISSIBLY ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE BY SALISBURY WITH THE FULL APPROVAL OF LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE:


While cross-examining a defense witness, at Page 562 of the corrupted trial transcript, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR was "examining" the witness about one of the Defendants' prior associates:

Salisbury Question:  (The associate) He's a drug addict.
Defense Counsel:  Objection.
LAPDOG COLLIER:  OVERRULED.

Now, let's take a look at a similar comment in SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR'S closing "argument," found at Page 1039 of the corrupted transcript:

Salisbury: ... he's (Defendant) hanging around a bunch of DRUG ADDICTS.
Defense Counsel:  Objection.
LAPDOG COLLIER:  OVERRULED.

Firstly there was no testimony, other than the impermissible testimony of SALISBURY, WHO HAS ALREADY BEEN SHOWN TO BE A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, that the defendant ever associated with a "drug addict" or a "bunch of drug addicts."

Secondly, it his highly prejudicial, and impermissible, to interject the subject of drugs into a case where drug offenses have not been charged.

AS YOU CAN SEE. LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, TOWN WHORE, AND HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG" WAS TICKLED PINK WHEN HE PERMITTED SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, TO PREJUDICE THIS DEFENDANT BY IMPERMISSIBLY INJECTING DRUGS INTO THIS CASE, WHICH WAS NOT ABOUT DRUGS AT ALL.


THIS IS PRECISELY WHY THE ENDS OF JUSTICE WILL ONLY BE SERVED BY AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

ANOTHER PERFECT REPLACEMENT FOR LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER

Sooner or later, Republicrat judge CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT,TOWN WHORE, AND LAPDOG OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, will likely be disbarred from the "practice" of law (he really needs a lot more practice before he surpasses the cerebral level of a first-year law student). In fact he may soon be breaking big rocks into small ones, compliments of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons.

The question next arise as to who the Republicrats will next appoint to a lifetime uncontested seat on the Medina County bench to do the bidding of the Medina County Prosecutor.

While the readers have already been shown a potential candidate or two, here is a pretty much local DIRTBAG who seems to fit the bill quite nicely, although he does seem to have a bit too much hair.

MASSILLON —

Massillon Municipal Court Judge Edward J. Elum will face the Supreme Court’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline on Sept. 21.

In April, the board certified a complaint against Elum, who first was elected in 1995, that alleges he violated the rules of judicial conduct on two occasions in 2010.

In one case, Elum is accused of making “crude and improper” statements during a hearing in which neither defense attorneys nor prosecution were present to a man who was on probation and wasn’t abiding by court orders.

The other case stems from Elum’s involvement in the case of a drunken-driving suspect who received lewd photos and messages from the arresting officer, Massillon Police Officer John Mitchell.

The complaint states that Elum issued court orders that placed himself and the court in the middle of an administrative and potential criminal investigation of Mitchell. Elum ordered that copies of the text messages and photographs be held by the court in a sealed envelope even though there was no judicial reason to do so, according to the complaint.

Prosecutors refused to comply with the order, which was later dropped. Mitchell was suspended for five days, but did not face criminal charges. The drunken-driving suspect was cleared of the charge when lab tests showed no drugs or alcohol in her system the day of her arrest.

The complaint says Elum refused to remove himself from the case despite strong feelings about the allegations against Mitchell. Elum also is cited for publicly criticizing Police Chief Robert Williams before and after the case.

Elum will face a three-member panel at 10 a.m. Sept. 21 at the Ohio Judicial Center in Columbus. If the panel decides a violation was committed, it will recommend discipline to the Ohio Supreme Court, which has final say.

Penalties may include a public reprimand, law-license suspension for a maximum of two years, an indefinite suspension or disbarment.

Copyright 2011 The Independent. Some rights reserved

ON SECOND THOUGHT, AS IT TURNS OUT, ELUM MAY BE JUST TOO HONEST TO SIT ON THE BENCH IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SINCE HE ADMITTED HIS MISCONDUCT, UNLIKE LAPDOG COLLIER.

http://www.indeonline.com/communities/x1069114204/Elum-admits-violating-rules-governing-judges-lawyers

After he has tried to explain away all of his misconduct, Elum will have to share his experiences with LAPDOG COLLIER, who will shortly be Columbus bound for a hearing of his own before Supreme Court’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline.

THAT'S SOME GOOD NEWS, FOR A CHANGE!

MUCH MORE TO COME .....

CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, LIKE LAPDOG COLLIER, IS SHOWING HIS DESPERATION!

Like corrupt Medina County Judge LAPDOG COLLIER, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN is getting desperate, and he's beginning to show it!


HOLMAN, like all other corrupt politicians, doesn't like being held accountable for his corrupt conduct.  In fact, until the present day, no one has ever challenged him.

In the case being profiled at this blog, the Defendant's Trial Counsel has been holding HOLMAN's feet to the fire and he does not like it one little bit.

How dare an attorney, outside of the local old boy network of attorneys, dare to question his lack of integrity, or his usual and customary unethical and unlawful practices?

So, HOLMAN, in his usual and customary fashion, violates once again the Sixth Amendment by moving to deprive this Defendant of competent legal representation.  After all, why should this defendant have any legal representation at all?  After all, the Defendant, a factually innocent person was railroaded into prison by HOLMAN, SALISBURY, AND LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER.  This, of course, is wishful thinking by HOLMAN, who deserves nothing less than his own trial in U.S. District Court for his role in denying the citizens of Medina County, as well as this Defendant, their rights  and protections accorded them by the United States Constitution.


THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, AS HOLMAN SEES IT, IS NOTHING MORE THAN A "SCRAP OF PAPER!"


Readers may wish to review a prior post at this blog, captioned LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN, SALISBURY CONSIDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION TO BE NO MORE THAN A SCRAP OF PAPER, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/08/lapdog-collier-holman-salisbury.html

Now, in yet another abomination, HOLMAN has filed a brief, no doubt objecting to a correction of the trial record which has been tampered with, altered, and changed to the intended benefit of his office and the intended benefit of his LAPDOG, MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER.


As the reader can tell from the entry below, taken directly from the website of the Medina County Clerk of Court, HOLMAN does not want the public to see that objection, since the brief cannot be viewed by the general public.


SO, HOLMAN IS NOW MOST CERTAINLY OBJECTING TO ANY CORRECTION TO THE TAMPERED TRIAL TRANSCRIPT, AND WANTS TO DEPRIVE THIS DEFENDANT OF HIS COMPETENT AND AGGRESSIVE DEFENSE COUNSEL, ALL IN HIS OWN SELF-INTEREST.


It must be said the HOLMAN actually believed that no one would catch the fact that the trial record had been tampered with, primarily because no has ever detected the tampering before. 


READERS CAN BE SURE THAT THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME A TAMPERED TRIAL TRANSCRIPT FROM MEDINA COUNTY HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE 9th DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS!

Date	Title	Notes	Document
8/29/2011	BRIEF FILED	IN RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO CORRECT TRANSCRIPTS AND MOTION TO HAVE DEFENSE COUNSEL RECUSED FROM CASE	No Document

9th DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS: "(COLLIER) SHOULD NOT HAVE LET (SALISBURY) GET AWAY WITH IT!"

The precise words of the 9th District Court of Appeals, chastising LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, are found in a recently decided appellate decision in the case of State v. Johnson, found at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2011/2011-ohio-3623.pdf.


Precisely, the 9th District Court of Appeal, in a decision issued on July 25, 2011, held:

The prosecutor’s “cross-examination” of these women was improper, and the trial court should not have allowed him to get away with it.

 The Court of Appeals was commenting on the conduct of both LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER and Medina County Ass. prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR!


What the Court of Appeals has not recognized is that COLLIER, A LAPDOG OF MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DEAN HOLMAN,  has been letting SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, "get away with it" for years!


Simply put, letting SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR "get away with it" is the only way that LAPDOG COLLIER, a Republican, can retain his uncontested lifetime appointment to the Medina County bench, compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and the Medina County Democrat Party.


The blogger has taken the time to read prior decisions of the 9th District Court of Appeals, found at http://www.ninth.courts.state.oh.us/.  Armed with the knowledge of the corrupt practices of LAPDOG COLLIER and the criminal assistants of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, those opinions have quite a tale to tell!


The substance of some of those prior appellate decisions, when placed in the context of the finding of the 9th District Court of Appeals in the recent Johnson Opinion, cited above, reveals a longstanding history of misconduct by LAPDOG COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.


Certain of those prior decisions of the 9th District Court of Appeals will be profiled in future segments of this blog, and compared with the Johnson Opinion, and the unethical and unlawful conduct of LAPDOG COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR in the case being profiled at this blog.

IT IS PATENTLY CLEAR THAT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN HAS NEVER TAKEN ANY ACTION TO CURB THE ABUSES AND MISCONDUCT OF HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS, DESPITE THE COMMENTS OF THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME.


ONE CAN ONLY CONCLUDE THAT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN NOT ONLY APPROVES, BUT ACTUALLY ENCOURAGES THE MISCONDUCT OF HIS ASSISTANTS SOLELY TO PRESERVE HIS TARNISHED 98% CONVICTION RATE, PRESERVED ONLY AT THE COST OF INNOCENT INDIVIDUALS WHOM HE PROSECUTES DAILY BEFORE HIS LAPDOG, JUDGE COLLIER, WHO WILL DO ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING, INCLUDING VIOLATE THE LAW, TO PRESERVE HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, CLAIMS CORRUPT FEDERAL JUDGE WILL GET HIM OUT OF THIS MESS !

SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR claims that a Corrupt Federal Judge will perpetuate the CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS!

In a rather interesting turn of events, Medina Ass. prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, relies upon the presumption that the corruption that pervades the Medina County Courts reaches well into the Federal Judiciary!


On Saturday, August 20, 2011, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, sent the following email message to this blog:

What you fail to understand is, that the FBI does not care. You see, the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for Northern District of Ohio is none other than the wife of current Ohio Representative for the 69th District, Bill Batchelder. Who preceded Collier as judge, who you regard as corrupt. And given how corruption works, does it not seem like Collier was not the first, considering how Holman, who you regard as corrupt has been in office since 1988. The fact is that she will throw out any case, if what you claim about corruption is true.

THIS SEEMS TO BE NOTHING MORE THAN WISHFUL THINKING ON THE PART OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.

SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, imputes to Federal Judge Alice Batchelder and the Federal Judiciary the same level of corruption that pervades the Medina County Courts.  Contrary to his claims, SALISBURY has not, and cannot, produce any compelling evidence that Judge Batchelder is corrupt, as he alleges.

Further, since SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, has been so busy conspiring with LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER to deprive innocent citizens of their constitutional protections in order to railroad the innocent to prison, he has failed to keep up with current events.

Contrary to SALISBURY'S assertion, Judge Alice Batchelder sits on the 6th Circuit in the U.S. Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, Ohio, and is not the Chief Judge for the Northern District of Ohio.

Once again, the SALISBURY'S hopes and wishful thinking that an allegedly corrupt Federal Judge Alice Batchelder will throw out any Federal indictment levied against him, LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, and CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, have been dashed by the FACTS.


One would have to believe that Rep. William Batchelder and the Honorable Federal Judge Alice Batcheldeer will be none too pleased when they learn that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, acting in concert with LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER and CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, has alleged that FEDERAL JUDGE BATCHELDER IS AS CORRUPT AS THEY ARE.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG COLLIER HEARS FOOTSTEPS, SEEKS LEGAL ADVICE !

It would seem that LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, is beginning to come to the realization that he will soon be facing more than defendants from his perch on the Medina County Bench.

In a prior segment of this blog, readers were treated to an exchange between LAPDOG COLLIER and SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR taken from a part of the trial record that the criminals at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station had not changed, all to their intended benefit.


The exchange concerned whether or not a defendant charged with the burglary of an occupied dwelling would be entitled to a jury instruction on the lesser-included offense of Criminal Trespass, a misdemeanor offense.


LAPDOG COLLIER endorsed the unlawful position of SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, and refused to give the instruction to the jury on the lesser-included misdemeanor offense because, AS THEY BOTH AGREED ON THE RECORD, the burglary of an inhabited dwelling bars the trial judge from giving the lesser-included misdemeanor instruction, thus foreclosing the jury from finding the Defendant guilty of a misdemeanor.


ONE PROBLEM, HOWEVER.  LAPDOG COLLIER APPARENTLY FORGOT THAT THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS OVERTURNED A CONVICTION IN ONE OF HIS TRIALS A YEAR PRIOR FOR FAILING TO GIVE THE LESSER-INCLUDED OFFENSE INSTRUCTION TO THE JURY.


IN OTHER WORDS, LAPDOG COLLIER AND SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, DELIBERATELY VIOLATED THE HOLDING OF THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS THAT THE MISDEMEANOR OFFENSE OF AGGRAVATED BURGLARY IS A LESSER-INCLUDED OFFENSE AND THAT THE LESSER-INCLUDED INSTRUCTION MUST BE GIVEN, CONSIDERING THE EVIDENCE IN A LIGHT MOST FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENDANT.


A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF JUDICIAL AND PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT AND CORRUPTION IN THE COURTS OF MEDINA COUNTY.


Readers may wish to refresh and observe first-hand the MISCONDUCT OF LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER AND SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR in the prior post found at  http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/08/lapdog-collier-doesnt-take-correction.html

It now seems that LAPDOG COLLIER is finally starting to see the light of day and beginning to recognize that all of his misdeeds are beginning to catch up with him

The above -referenced post at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/08/lapdog-collier-doesnt-take-correction.html exposing the blatant misconduct of LAPDOG COLLIER was published at this blog on Monday, August 15, 2011.

That date is singularly important for a very specific reason, as you are about to learn.

Turning now to another aggravated burglary case presently filed in the Kangaroo Courts of Medina County, on June 16, 2011, the Office of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR filed a motion to transfer an aggravated burglary case away from Judge Kimbler to the courtroom of LAPDOG COLLIER, with the obvious knowledge that LAPDOG COLLIER would deprive this defendant of his rights, as he's done to so many other defendants, and railroad that defendant, again as LAPDOG COLLIER has done so many times in the past.


DINO HOLMAN'S motion can be found here: http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=11CR0291&p=1&a=12 

In response to the motion, LAPDOG COLLIER approved the transfer of the aggravated burglary case from Judge Kimbler to his own docket, most certainly with a sense of glee, anticipating that he would be able to railroad one more defendant in an aggravated burglary case.


LAPDOG COLLIER'S order, filed on June 20, 2001 and transferring the case to himself can be found here:  http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspxcase=11CR0291&p=1&a=16

Some months have passed until, on Monday, August 15, 2011, this blog published the irrefutable facts documenting LAPDOG COLLIER'S corrupt practices in the matter of the trial being profiled here at this blog, an alleged aggravated burglary case.


LO AND BEHOLD, ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 18, 2001, LAPDOG COLLIER RECUSED HIMSELF FROM HEARING THE AGGRAVATED BURGLARY CASE HE HAD EARLIER TRANSFERRED TO HIMSELF!


LAPDOG COLLIER'S order of self-recusal can be found here: http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=11CR0291&p=1&a=24

Might you, the reader, think that this is all but a coincidence?  This blogger thinks not!


It would certainly seem that LAPDOG COLLIER, upon the advice of legal counsel (his own), is now trying to avoid any further taint by refusing to railroad anymore defendants for CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, in burglary trials,  at least until all of this controversy blows over.


LAPDOG COLLIER is just not the type to do the right thing for the right reason.


THE BLOGGER HAS SOME SOBERING NEWS FOR LAPDOG COLLIER.  THE CONTROVERSY OVER THE CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS IS NOT GOING TO BLOW OVER.


THE CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS IS NOT GOING AWAY UNTIL HE, CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, AND SALISBURY THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, ALL GO AWAY ... TO THE UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY.


FURTHER, THE BLOGGER BELIEVES THAT LAPDOG COLLIER HAS LIKELY RETAINED DEFENSE COUNSEL BECAUSE HE FEARS THE INEVITABLE, AND HE WOULDN'T LIKE TO BE TREATED IN FEDERAL COURT THE WAY HE'S BEEN TREATING INNOCENT CITIZENS IN "HIS" COURTROOM FOR YEARS.


WHAT A HAPPY DAY IT WILL BE FOR THE CITIZENS OF MEDINA COUNTY WHEN LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN, AND SALISBURY ARE FINALLY PARADED OUT OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION IN HANDCUFFS.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....