WHEN CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN COMMANDS "JUMP," LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER ASKS "HOW HIGH?"

There is absolutely no doubt that CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN pulls the strings, and that LAPDOG JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER simply dances to HOLMAN'S tune.


Take, for example, the issue of Judicial Release, a procedure in law that affords an inmate to file for early release from prison confinement after serving a period of incarceration.  The inmate is required, by law, to apply for judicial release to the trial/sentencing judge.


This blogger has made an extensive review of cases heard by LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, and has not located a single case where LAPDOG COLLIER granted judicial release to any individual whom he has railroaded into prison at the behest of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND HOLMAN'S CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS.


While the law require that an inmate apply for judicial release to the trial judge, in Medina County the inmate might just as well apply to CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, since HOLMAN OPPOSES JUDICIAL RELEASE AND COMMANDS COLLIER TO DENY ANY SUCH APPLICATIONS!


It's time to review how LAPDOG COLLIER handles these applications for judicial release, at the direction of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.


Initially, inmates, with unfounded hope, submit their petitions for judicial release to LAPDOG COLLIER, not realizing that their chances of prevailing are significantly less than a snowball surviving the summer season in hell.


Once the inmate files a petition for judicial release, HOLMAN AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS FILE IDENTICAL OPPOSITIONS, WITHOUT ANY REGARD FOR THE MERITS OF THE APPLICATION.


HERE IS A TYPICAL FILING BY SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, OPPOSING JUDICIAL RELEASE:

HERE'S ANOTHER USUAL AND CUSTOMARY SALISBURY OPPOSITION TO JUDICIAL RELEASE, PRESENTED HERE FOR GOOD MEASURE:

NOTICE THE COMPLETE IDENTICAL NATURE OF THE "PLEADINGS?" IT CERTAINLY TOOK A BIT OF SHEER BRILLIANCE TO COMPOSE THIS MEANINGLESS "PLEADING," ALTHOUGH ONE CANNOT FIND ONE MISSPELLED WORD, SUGGESTING THAT SALISBURY BRUSHED UP ON HIS LATEST EDITION OF SPELLING FOR DUMMIES BEFORE HE SCRIBBLED CRAYON TO PAPER.

The above documents were randomly chosen, but identical to each and every opposition filed by SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, who has opposed each and every application filed with LAPDOG COLLIER, as far as this blogger has found.


The reader will take note of the boilerplate claims of SALISBURY that "the circumstances" dictate against early release.  However, SALISBURY, who spends most of his "workdays" trolling Craig's List at taxpayers' expense (Theft in Office), has never pled any so-called "circumstances" upon which LAPDOG COLLIER could have made an otherwise conscientious decision.  [It is noted that, in fact, LAPDOG COLLIER really does not possess a conscience.]


LAPDOG COLLIER, ever the dutiful puppet and stooge of DINO HOLMAN, does nothing more than rubber stamp SALISBURY'S fact-less oppositions and denies the inmates' petitions for judicial release.


A REVIEW OF THE DOCKET IN THE GATT AND REED CASES AT THE WEBSITE OF THE MEDINA COUNTY CLERK OF COURT AS OF THE PRESENT DATE DISCLOSES THAT LAPDOG COLLIER HAS NOT YET TAKEN THE TIME TO JOURNALIZE HIS DENIAL OF MR. GATT'S OR MR. REED'S PETITION FOR JUDICIAL RELEASE.


READERS CAN BE ASSURED THAT, AS CERTAINLY AS GOD MADE LITTLE GREEN APPLES, LAPDOG COLLIER, EVER THE DUTIFUL "PAVLOV DOG" OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, WILL DO EXACTLY AS HE'S ORDERED BY HOLMAN AND DENY BOTH PETITIONS IN DUE COURSE!


THAT'S HOW IT'S DONE IN MEDINA COUNTY, UNLESS YOU HAPPEN TO BE POLITICALLY CONNECTED, IN WHICH CASE YOU WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN CHARGED AND BROUGHT TO TRIAL IN THE FIRST INSTANCE!  [ See prior post, captioned MORE HOLMAN CORRUPTION REPORTED BY ANOTHER MEDINA COUNTY CITIZEN, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/10/more-holman-corruption-reported-by.html ]


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

A NON SEQUITOR IN MEDINA COUNTY !!!

A regular readers has forwarded a recent online news article to the blog, along with the observation that such would never be the case in the corrupt courts of Medina County.

Here's the headline:

Ohio prosecutors want law change to allow them to veto times when criminal defendants choose to have a judge decide a case

The complete article can be found at http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2011/11/ohio_prosecutors_want_law_chan.htmlhttp://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2011/11/ohio_prosecutors_want_law_chan.html .

It seems that prosecutors, outside of Medina County, may have concerns that a judge may be partial to or too lenient when deciding criminal cases.

SUCH IS CLEARLY NOT THE CASE IN MEDINA COUNTY!

CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN would love nothing better than to eliminate the jury system completely and have each and every defendant found guilty by LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.

As it is, the jury is just a mild inconvenience given the fact that LAPDOG COLLIER DOES EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO PREJUDICE A JURY AGAINST EACH AND EVERY PERSON APPEARING BEFORE HIM, THUS VIRTUALLY ASSURING HOLMAN CONVICTION AFTER CONVICTION.

Then, too, if the jury system were eliminated in Medina County, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS WOULD NOT HAVE TO WORK SO DILIGENTLY TO CONCEAL EVIDENCE.  AS IT STANDS NOW, THEY HAVE TO RELY ON LAPDOG COLLIER TO CONCEAL EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE IF THE DEFENSE ATTORNEY PRESSES HARD ON THAT ISSUE.  

THEN, TOO, LAPDOG COLLIER WOULDN'T HAVE TO SPEND SO MUCH OF HIS TIME CLEANING UP AFTER HIMSELF BY TAMPERING WITH, ALTERING, AND AMENDING ALL OF THOSE TROUBLESOME TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS!

NO ONE WHO APPEARS BEFORE LAPDOG COLLIER SHOULD EVER CONSENT TO A BENCH TRIAL.  YOU WILL HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO CHANCE THAT YOUR CASE WILL BE DECIDED FAIRLY ON THE MERITS AND ON THE COMPETENT, CREDIBLE EVIDENCE!

In the final analysis, this blogger agrees completely with the reader who sent along the news article.  One will never hear CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and his criminal assistants (an apt characterization) object to having LAPDOG COLLIER railroad an innocent defendant, without a jury.

MUCH MORE TO COME .....

"AFTER THE FIRST TEN MINUTES, I KNEW HE DIDN'T HAVE A CHANCE"

Those are the words of an anguished parent whose son was railroaded by LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.


The prosecutor in the case, of course, was none other than SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR whose ongoing pattern of egregious misconduct, is endorsed and promoted by CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.

This distraught parent remarked that the innocent son's trial was marked by LAPDOG COLLIER'S usual and customary Vaudevillian theatrics, and SALISBURY'S typical misconduct, WHICH MISCONDUCT WAS ENABLED AND FACILITATED THROUGHOUT BY LAPDOG COLLIER.


While all of this came as no surprise to the blogger, it raised an interesting issue that the blogger decided to investigate further: JUST HOW LONG HAVE LAPDOG COLLIER AND SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, TEAMED UP TO VIOLATE THE RIGHTS OF INNOCENT CITIZENS IN ORDER TO RAILROAD THEM INTO PRISON?


The answer to that question, as the blogger has discovered, is that LAPDOG COLLIER AND SALISBURY THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, HAVE BEEN ENGAGING, IN TANDEM, IN THEIR UNETHICAL AND UNLAWFUL CONDUCT FOR A LONG, LONG TIME.


WHEN LOOKING AT THE HISTORICAL RECORD OF LAPDOG COLLIER'S UNETHICAL AND UNLAWFUL CONDUCT, IT COMES AS NO SURPRISE THAT CORRUPT DEM PROSECUTOR AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEM PARTY HAVE REFUSED TO RUN A CANDIDATE OPPOSING "REPUBLICAN" LAPDOG COLLIER.


FOR CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, IT CAN'T GET ANY BETTER THAN BEING ABLE TO CONTROL THE OUTCOME OF TRIALS THAN BY HAVING A STOOGE LIKE LAPDOG COLLIER TO TAKE HIS MARCHING ORDERS DIRECTLY FROM HOLMAN AND HOLMAN'S CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS, WITHOUT FAIL.


At this juncture, it is worthy of a stroll down memory lane to discover that no fewer than 20 appellants have raised issues of SALISBURY'S PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, ALL OF WHICH HAS BEEN ENABLED AND FACILITATED BY LAPDOG COLLIER.


This fact, of course, is by no means to suggest that the MISCONDUCT OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR AND LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.  Rather, these are just the cases where the OBVIOUS MISCONDUCT WAS RAISED AS AN ISSUE ON APPEAL!


LET'S GO STROLLING:

State v Aaron Gatt, 2011-Ohio-5221, tried by Salisbury before Collier

found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2011/2011-ohio-5221.pdf 

"... the prosecutor made numerous inappropriate comments throughout the course of this trial.  In addition to the threat Mr. Gatt has assigned as error, the prosecutor repeatedly expressed his personal belief regarding the credibility of witnesses (during direct-examination of his own witness, cross-examination of the defendant, and closing argument) and frequently introduced facts not in evidence via his “questions” to various witnesses."

"This Court has previously addressed this prosecutor’s tendency to engage in “widespread improper conduct” in the courtroom.  State v. Johnson, 9th Dist. No. 09CA0054-M, 2011-Ohio-3623, at ¶62, 42-70." 

State v Brian Johnson, 2011-Ohio-3623, tried by Salisbury before Collier 

(SENTENCE VACATED/REMANDED)

found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2011/2011-ohio-3623.pdf

"The prosecutor in this case did engage in a pattern of improper conduct." 

"The prosecutor’s “cross-examination” of these women was improper, and the trial
court should not have allowed him to get away with it."

"The prosecutor was argumentative, asked improper questions, made testimonialassertions, referred to facts that were not in the record, misrepresented the evidence, and expressed his personal opinion of Mr. Johnson’s credibility." 

State v Riffle, 2010-Ohio-2812, tried by Salisbury before Collier

found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2010/2010-ohio-2812.pdf

"In his first assignment of error, Riffle contends that he was denied a fair trial due
 to prosecutorial misconduct."

"Riffle takes issue with statements made by the prosecutor during opening and closing          statements as well as on cross- examination."

"Riffle points to the prosecutor’s statements regarding the fact that S.R. had
 no reason to lie and that she was testifying against Riffle because it was the truth."
 "Riffle points to two specific instances of alleged prosecutorial misconduct that
 occurred during Riffle’s cross examination." 

State v Craig Maynard, 2009-Ohio-282, tried by Salisbury before Collierfound at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2009/2009-ohio-282.pdf

"Mr. Maynard’s second assignment of error is that the trial court incorrectly
prevented him from questioning witnesses about Mrs. B.’s and B.M.’s veracity."

State v Peter Riffle, 2008-Ohio-4155, tried by Salisbury before Collier (REVERSED) 

found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2008/2008-ohio-4155.pdf

"Mr. Johnson’s second assignment of error is that the prosecutor engaged in a pattern of improper conduct that deprived him of a fair trial."

"In his first assignment of error, Riffle asserts that his constitutional rights were
violated: ... (3) when the State referenced Riffle’s decision to cease interrogation with police during closing argument."

“Questioning regarding post-Miranda silence is improper.”  State v. Gales (Nov.22, 2000), 9th Dist. No. 00CA007541, at *4, citing Doyle, 426 U.S. at 619.  With regard to a defendant’s Fifth Amendment rights, the Supreme Court of Ohio had held that “the use of pre- arrest silence as substantive evidence of guilt is an impermissible burden upon the exercise of the Fifth Amendment privilege.”  

"If references to post-Miranda silences are permitted under the guise of establishing “background information,” it would be futile for a defendant to ever effectively invoke his right to remain silent.  We, therefore, hold that the evidence of, and the State’s references to, Riffle’s silence were improper."

"In his third assignment of error, Riffle asserts that the State engaged in misconduct
by: (1) stating in opening argument that the defense would likely use a “built-in” defense thereby implying the defense is false or illegitimate; (2) imputing that defense counsel was insincere during closing argument; (3) asking the jury during closing argument to compare S.R.’s veracity with that of their own teenage daughters; (4) giving a personal belief as to the veracity of the evidence during closing argument; and (5) implying during closing argument that the jury had a duty to convict Riffle because of S.R.’s courage in coming forward."

State v Robert Morris, 2008-Ohio-3209, tried by Salisbury before Collier  (REVERSED)

found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2008/2008-ohio-3209.pdf

“The trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offenseof criminal trespassing and in failing to properly instruct on a necessary elementof criminal trespass as required for a conviction of burglary in violation of[Defendant’s] rights to due process and fair trial under the Sixth and Fourteenth  Amendments to the Ohio and United States Constitutions.” 

 “If under any reasonable view of the evidence it is possible for the trier of fact to
find the defendant not guilty of the greater offense and guilty of the lesser offense, the instruction on the lesser included offense must be given. The evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to defendant.”

State v Anthony Divincenzo, 2006-Ohio-6330, tried by Salisbury before Collier 
found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2006/2006-ohio-6330.pdf

        "In his fifth assignment of error, Appellant argues that the trial court
         erred in permitting the State to introduce testimony that Appellant invoked his
         right to counsel during his interview with police."

State v Michael Scheck, 2006-Ohio-647, tried by Salisbury before Collier

found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2006/2006-ohio-647.pdf

"In his first assignment of error, Appellant argues that the trial court
  committed reversible error when it prohibited the defense from cross-   examining T.D. regarding her prior sexual activity with the co-defendant." 

"In his second assignment of error, Appellant contends that the State committed prosecutorial misconduct when it authorized the destruction of crucial evidence prior to trial. "   

"In Appellant’s sixth assignment of error, he contends that the State also committed prosecutorial misconduct when it referred to Appellant as a “rapist” during trial."

State v Henry Smith, 2005-Ohio-1001, tried by Salisbury before Collier 

found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2005/2005-ohio-1001.pdf

  

         "In his fourth assignment of error, Appellant has argued that he was

         not afforded a fair trial due to prosecutorial misconduct.  Specifically, Appellant

         has argued that the State made prejudicial statements during its closing arguments,

         and that such statements prevented Appellant from receiving a fair trial."

State v Bryan Nelson, 2004-Ohio-4967, tried by Salisbury before Collier

found at:  http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2004/2004-ohio-4967.pdf

"In his final assignment of error, Appellant argues that he was denied
 a fair trial due to the misconduct of the prosecutor."

State v Samuel Cutlip, 2004-Ohio-2120, tried by Salisbury before Collier

found at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2004/2004-ohio-2120.pdf

"In his first assignment of error, Appellant maintains that the trial
court erred by admitting certain statements in violation of his Confrontation
Clause rights."

ALTHOUGH BUT A FEW OF THE CASES IMPLICATING THE UNCHECKED, LONGSTANDING, ONGOING PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, HAVE BEEN CITED HERE, SALISBURY'S MISCONDUCT DID NOT SIMPLY OCCUR IN A VACUUM.

LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, WAS LOOKING DOWN FROM HIS PERCH ON HIGH, COMPLETELY COMFORTABLE THAT HE WILL NEVER HAVE TO FACE A DEMOCRAT CHALLENGER IN ANY OF THOSE FUTURE RIGGED MEDINA COUNTY ELECTIONS DUE TO HIS COMPLICITY WITH CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, CHEERING ON SALISBURY FOR AN UNTOLD NUMBER OF YEARS!


THE CASES CITED HERE, AND OTHERS, ARE SINGULARLY COMPELLING EVIDENCE OF THE LONGSTANDING CORRUPTION THAT PERVADES COURTROOM NO. 1, AND PERMEATES THE COMMON CRIMINALS WHO OPERATE WITHIN IT, AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION.


THESE CASES ARE MORE UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE THAT COMPELS AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

   

   

  

 

     

  

 

CORRUPT OHIO JUDGES LIKE LAPDOG COLLIER ARE DROPPING LIKE FLIES!

It's about time!  Suddenly, a spate of corrupt Ohio judges seem to be facing some measure of justice, themselves.  They are starting to drop like flies.

From a recent article appearing in the Springfield Sun News:

SPRINGFIELD — Some say it proves he’s tough on crime while others say it provides a glimpse of a judge whose personal views interfere with his ability to follow the law.
The six-count complaint made public Tuesday accuses Clark County Common Pleas Court Judge Douglas Rastatter of judicial misconduct that includes claims that he failed to follow the law, failed to uphold the integrity of the judiciary, engaged in prejudicial conduct and acted in a manner that does not promote confidence in the judiciary.

Clark County Common Pleas Judge Doug Rastatter of Springfield, Ohio has been charged by the Disciplinary Counsel of the Ohio Supreme Court with some of the various violations in which LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, HAS ENGAGED FOR MANY YEARS:


1)  LAPDOG COLLIER, like Ratstatter, has consistently failed to follow the law as he preserves his uncontested grip on his political appointment to the Medina County Court, compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and the Medina County Dem party.


2)  Most certainly, LAPDOG COLLIER has failed to uphold the integrity of the judiciary.  In fact, LAPDOG COLLIER has consistently demonstrated that he lacks any scintilla of integrity.


3)  LAPDOG COLLIER daily engages in prejudicial conduct, solely for the purpose of preserving his uncontested grip on his political appointment to the Medina County Court, compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and the Medina County Dem party. 


4)  Finally, LAPDOG COLLIER has quite clearly acted in a manner that completely destroys any confidence in the judiciary one might have otherwise had.


THE ABOVE IS JUST A SMALL LIST OF INFRACTIONS DESCRIBING THE UNETHICAL AND UNLAWFUL CONDUCT IN WHICH LAPDOG COLLIER HAS ENGAGED. 


Most certainly, WHEN LAPDOG COLLIER TAMPERS WITH "OFFICIAL" TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS, AS IN THE CASE PROFILED AT THIS BLOG, LAPDOG COLLIER engenders nothing but COMPLETE CONTEMPT for the Medina County Judiciary.


The article goes on:

The complaint includes claims that Rastatter repeatedly failed to follow the law or showed bias toward defense counsel and defendants that later led to reversals of his decisions by the 2nd District Court of Appeals.

LAPDOG COLLIER, WILL NEVER BE ACCUSED OF DISPLAYING ANY FAVORABLE TREATMENT OF DEFENDANTS IN HIS KANGAROO COURTROOM AND, LIKE RATSTATTER, HAS BEEN AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE REVERSED BY THE COURT OF APPEALS BECAUSE OF HIS DELIBERATELY ERRANT RULINGS INTENDED TO CONVICT INNOCENT MEDINA COUNTY CITIZENS.  [See prior posts at this blog, captioned LAPDOG COLLIER DOESN'T TAKE CORRECTION FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/08/lapdog-collier-doesnt-take-correction.html ; and 9th DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS: "(COLLIER) SHOULD NOT HAVE LET (SALISBURY) GET AWAY WITH IT!" at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/09/9th-district-court-of-appeals-collier.html ]


According to the article, retired judge James Brogan commented of Ratstatter:

“If he’s disciplined, he won’t be the first judge and he won’t be the last."

JUDGE BROGAN IS CERTAINLY RIGHT ON THAT ACCOUNT.  READERS CAN BE ASSURED THAT LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, IS MOST ASSUREDLY ON THAT LIST!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

IT'S BOLOGNA LOAF FOR THANKSGIVING DINNER FOR LAPDOG COLLIER!

Now that the Thanksgiving Holiday is but one day away, most families are preparing to sit down to the tradition Thanksgiving Dinner of turkey, with all of the related epicurean delights.

Such, however, is not the case at the household of LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.  LAPDOG COLLIER has decided to forgo the usual holiday tradition this year.

LAPDOG COLLIER WILL TREATING HIMSELF TO A HOLIDAY MEAL OF BOLOGNA LOAF THIS THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY.


While most of us are prepared to give thanks for all of the blessings that we have received this year, LAPDOG COLLIER is giving thanks:

1)  That he received a lifetime political appointment to the Medina County Bench, compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and the Medina County Dems.


2)  That he has never had to face a Democrat opponent in a General Election, since his political appointment to the Medina County court, all compliments of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and the Medina County Dems.


3)  That he doesn't really have to know the law or the Rules of Evidence, since he just has to do as he's told by CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and his criminal assistants.


4)  That he doesn't have to ponder whether he is is imposing a fair and just sentence to every defendant that he railroads, but he just imposes whatever sentence mandated to him by  CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and his criminal assistants.

5)  That he doesn't have to worry about violating the Constitution of the United States, the Constitution of the State of Ohio, or the Rules of Evidence, since he can't understand all of that legalese anyway.

6) That he doesn't have to really worry about being reversed and overturned by the Ninth District Court of Appeals because all he has to do is TAMPER WITH, ALTER, AND AMEND TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS TO CHANGE THE RECORD AND ELIMINATE APPELLATE ISSUES AND HIS PROFUSE DELIBERATE "ERRORS" FROM THE RECORD.


7)  That he has a court reporter under contract who is willing to sacrifice and semblance of integrity and permit LAPDOG COLLIER TO TAMPER WITH, ALTER, AND AMEND TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS TO CHANGE THE RECORD AND ELIMINATE APPELLATE ISSUES AND HIS PROFUSE DELIBERATE "ERRORS" FROM THE RECORD.


8)   MOST OF ALL, HOWEVER, LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, IS PARTICULARLY THANKFUL THAT HE'S NOT YET BEEN INDICTED BY THE FEDERAL GRAND JURY FOR HIS CRIMES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TAMPERING WITH, ALTERING, AND AMENDING THE "OFFICIAL" TRIAL TRANSCRIPT OF THE CASE BEING PROFILED AT THIS BLOG.


Now, you may ask, how does Bologna Loaf figure into LAPDOG COLLIER'S holiday repast?
The answer to that question is rally quite simple.

LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, KNOWS FULL WELL THAT HE HAS VIOLATED THE LAW UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW.  FURTHER, LAPDOG COLLIER KNOWS FULL WELL THAT HE HAS BEEN CAUGHT RED-HANDED TAMPERING WITH THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT!


LAPDOG COLLIER ALSO KNOWS FULL WELL THAT IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME UNTIL HE WILL BE INDICTED BY A FEDERAL GRAND JURY FOR HIS CRIMES, TRIED, AND CONVICTED IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT.


ONCE SAFELY BEHIND PRISON WALLS, LAPDOG COLLIER WILL BE TREATED TO BOLOGNA LOAF FOR THANKSGIVING DINNERS IN THE FUTURE, COMPLIMENTS OF THE U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS.


LAPDOG COLLIER IS HAVING BOLOGNA LOAF FOR DINNER THIS YEAR IN ANTICIPATION OF THE INVOLUNTARY THANKSGIVING DINNERS HE WILL BE LOOKING FORWARD TO IN FUTURE YEARS, AT TAXPAYERS' EXPENSE!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG COLLIER FINDS HOLIDAY SHOPPING A NIGHTMARE!

As the Holiday Seasons approaches, LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, has found that holiday shopping has been quite upsetting for him.

Reports have been received that LAPDOG COLLIER has been quite upset over all of the tamper-proof packaging he has found in the store of many of the local merchants.

LAPDOG COLLIER is quoted as saying to one bewildered clerk, "What's the matter?   Don't they trust me?"

The unequivocal answer to that question is, NO, LAPDOG COLLIER CANNOT BE TRUSTED IN EVEN THE MOST MINOR OF MATTERS!


GIVEN THE FACT THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, HAS TAMPERED WITH THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT OF THE PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE BEING PROFILED AT THIS BLOG, AND LIKELY MANY MORE, IT WOULD BE WISE TO AVOID ANY OF THE SHOPS THAT LAPDOG COLLIER IS KNOWN TO FREQUENT.


NOTWITHSTANDING THOSE STANDARD PRODUCT SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, LAPDOG COLLIER WILL FIND A WAY AROUND THEM, JUST LIKE HE'S FOUND AN UNLAWFUL WAY TO DEFEAT  THE APPEALS OF THOSE INNOCENT CITIZENS WHOM HE HAS WRONGLY CONVICTED AND RAILROADED, BY TAMPERING WITH TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS!


THIS IS A SUPERB REASON THAT COMPELS AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

ANOTHER UNOPPOSED JUDGE WINS ELECTION IN A LANDSLIDE!

Now that the polls have long since closed and the election result announced, it has been confirmed that WADSWORTH MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE STEVEN McILVAINE HAS WON RE-ELECTION IN A LANDSLIDE.


HOWEVER, IN THE USUAL AND CUSTOMARY MEDINA COUNTY FASHION, McILVAINE "RAN" UNOPPOSED.


Readers may recall that McILVAINE, who is an instructor at the Ohio Judicial College, teaches newby judges since he is a self-proclaimed "expert" in matters involving the initial appearances of defendants in court.

the one glaring problem, however, is that McILVAINE HAS ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHAT HE'S DOING.


McILVAINE has demonstrated that he has no knowledge of and respect for the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution nor Rule 3 of the Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Readers may recall that McILVAINE permits Keystone Deputies from the Medina County Sheriff's Office to issue their own arrest warrants based upon unsworn and  constitutionally defective criminal complaints.


As most readers are surely aware, although McILVAINE is obviously oblivious, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires, "No warrant shall issue but upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation."


This little bit of long-overlooked mandate of the law requires that law enforcement officers, when framing a criminal complaint, set out a statement of facts, particularly describing the alleged conduct of a suspect.

McILVAINE simply ignores that Constitutional Mandate as he regularly and routinely accepts for filing  criminal complaints without the requisite statement of essential facts.  [ See prior posts at this blog, captioned, WADSWORTH MUNICIPAL COURT, WHERE THE FLAWED PROCESS BEGINS, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/wadsworth-municipal-court-where-flawed.html ; and 

A TYPICAL DEFECTIVE MEDINA COUNTY CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/typical-defective-medina-county.html ; and also WHAT YOU WON'T FIND IN MEDINA COUNTY COURTS: A PROPER CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/what-you-wont-find-in-medina-county.html ]

McILVAINE will now subject the Citizens of Medina County to more of the same for another term, all thanks to the Medina County politicos who deliberately deprive the citizens of their right to choose their "elected" officials.


THIS IS JUST ONE MORE REASON FOR INTERVENTION BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....