THE HEARING WAS PURPORTEDLY CONDUCTED BY JUDGE COSGROVE TO ENTERTAIN MOTIONS IN A CASE RELATED TO THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME IN WHICH "GODFATHER" HOE-MAN" AND MEMBERS OF HIS CRIME SYNDICATE RAPED AND PILLAGED THE ESTATE OF A LOCAL RESIDENT, DEFRAUDING THE RIGHTFUL HEIRS OF THEIR INHERITANCE, DEFRAUDING THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OH TAXATION, AND DEFRAUDING THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OF TAX REVENUES - A FEDERAL CRIME.
SETTING ASIDE FOR THE MOMENT THAT BRAIN RICHTER CLAIMED TO HAVE BROUGHT HIS FALSE AND FRAUDULENT MOTION ON BEHALF OF SGT. HUFF, BRAIN RICHTER NEVER SPOKE WITH SGT. HUFF ABOUT THE MATTER AND SGT. HUFF NEVER REQUESTED HOE-MAN OR BRAIN RICHTER TO OPPOSE HIS APPEARANCE AT THE HEARING.
IT IS CLEAR THAT BRAIN RICHTER DID NOTHING MORE THAN HOE-MAN'S UNLAWFUL BIDDING TO PREVENT SGT. HUFF FROM TESTIFYING AND PRODUCING HIS OFFICIAL POLICE REPORTS IMPLICATING HOE-MAN IN THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME AND FURTHER EVIDENCE OF HOE-MAN'S FURTHER CRIMINAL CONDUCT OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
IN FACT, THE ACTIONS OF HOE-MAN AND BRAIN RICHTER, IN OBSTRUCTING SGT. HUFF'S TESTIMONY AND PRODUCTION OF RECORDS CONSTITUTES YET ANOTHER CRIMINAL OFFENSE BY BOTH OF THESE JAGOFF ATTORNEYS : WITNESS TAMPERING.
HAVING SET THE STAGE, IT'S TIME TO EVALUATE BRAIN RICHTER'S INTELLECTUAL CAPACITIES.
JUDGE COSGROVE HELD THE JANUARY 29, 2016 HEARING IN CASE NO. 08CIV0502.
BELOW IS A COPY OF THE CASE IDENTIFIERS TAKEN FROM THE WEBSITE OF THE MEDINA COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS:
YOU WILL NOTICE THAT CASE NO. 08CIV0502 IS CAPTIONED BRADLEY A. DEPEW, ET AL. v. DANA L. DEPEW, ET AL.
JUDGE COSGROVE ISSUED AN ORDER REQUIRING ATTENDANCE AT THE JANUARY 29, 2016, SHOWN BELOW:
YOU WILL NOTICE THAT JUDGE COSGTOVE CAPTIONED THE CASE "BRAD DEPEW, DEPEW DRILLING, MEDINA DRILLING & PUMP v. GREGG DEPEW."
JUDGE COSGROVE'S CASE CAPTION IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT. NOTICE THAT BRAD DEPEW AND DEPEW DRILLING ARE BOTH PLAINTIFFS ON THE CASE, WHILE GREGG DEPEW HAS BEEN NAMED A DEFENDANT IN CASE NO. 08CIV0502.
NOW, LET'S LOOK AT BRAIN RICHTER'S CASE CAPTION IN HIS FALSE AND FRAUDULENT MOTION, FILED IN CASE NO. 08CIV0502 ON JANUARY 29, 2016:
YOU WILL NOTICE THAT BRAIN HAS IDENTIFIED BRAD DEPEW AS THE PLAINTIFF AND DEPEW DRILLING AS THE DEFENDANT IN CASE NO.08CIV0502, WHEN, IN FACT,
BRAD DEPEW AND DEPEW DRILLING ARE BOTH PLAINITFFS IN THE CASE.
DUH???? THERE IS NO DOCKETED CASE CAPTIONED BRADLEY DEPEW v. DEPEW DRILLING IN COURT RECORDS, UNLESS YOU CHOOSE THE BELIEVE THAT BRADLEY DEPEW IS SUING HIMSELF !
READERS SHOULD NOW BE CONCLUDING A NUMBER OF THINGS.
FIRSTLY, BRAIN RICHTER'S MOTION AND JUDGE COSGROVE'S GRANT OF BRAIN'S MOTION, PREVENTING SGT. HUFF FROM TESTIFYING AND PRODUCING RECORDS THAT IMPLICATE CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN IN THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME, ARE LEGAL NULLITIES (MEAING THEY HAVE NO LAWFUL FORCE AND EFFECT).
SECONDLY, BRAIN RICHTER IS NOT THE SHARPEST KNIFE IN THE DRAWER AND IS NOT LIKELY ABLE TO DIFFERENTIATE PLAINTIFF FROM DEFENDANT IN A CIVIL ACTION.
THIRDLY, JUDGE COSGROVE WAS APPARENTLY CONTENT TO GRANT BRAIN RICHETER'S MOTION IN A CASE THAT WAS NOT BEFORE HER. WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU ?
FINALLY, IT IS CLEAR THAT "BRAIN" APPEARS TO BE "BRAIN" DEAD, AND IS JUST ONE MORE TYPICAL F@@K-UP ON THE COUNTY PAYROLL! BRAIN IS JUST THE KIND OF GUY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR LIKES TO KEEP AROUND !!!
IT IS PRETTY CLEAR WHY "BRAIN" IS NOT WORKING ON THE LUNAR LANDER PROJECT AT NASA.
No comments:
Post a Comment