WHAT INTEGRITY ???

As has been previously shown at this blog, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, in an act of sheer desperation to avoid an evidentiary hearing scheduled by Visiting Judge Brown, has filed an affidavit of disqualification with the Ohio Supreme Court, seeking to remove Judge Brown from hearing and deciding the merits of this meritorious Petition for Post Conviction Relief.


Of course, DINO HOLMAN does not want the public to see just what he has contained in his affidavit, so he has unlawfully instructed the Clerk of Court to conceal his affidavit from public view.

It is interesting to note that in one of his disingenuous claims, HOLMAN MAKES THE COMPLETELY RIDICULOUS CLAIM THAT JUDGE BROWN'S COMMENT THAT SALISBURY HAS ENGAGED IN MISCONDUCT IN THIS CASE, AS WELL AS IN OTHERS, REFLECTS THAT JUDGE BROWN HAS "EXPRESSED HIS OPINION ON THE INTEGRITY" OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR!


WHAT INTEGRITY ???  NEITHER SALISBURY NOR HOLMAN POSSESS THE SLIGHTEST SCINTILLA OF INTEGRITY, AS HAS ALREADY BEEN DEMONSTRATED AT THIS BLOG.


SALISBURY, with HOLMAN'S full approval, withholds and conceals exculpatory evidence from defendants, and likely destroys it rather than being held to account for his actions, in violation of the laws of the State of Ohio.  They tamper with, alter and amend the trial record, again in violation of the laws of the State of Ohio.  They make improper testimonial statements, argue with witnesses, hide witnesses favorable to the defense, mischaracterize the testimony of witnesses, make improper opening statements and closing arguments, all in collusion with LAPDOG JUDGE CHRIS COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.


WHERE CAN ANY INTEGRITY BE FOUND IN ANY OR ALL OF THIS EGREGIOUS MISCONDUCT?


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF THE HYPOCRISY OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN

CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, feeling the noose tightening around his neck, HAS MADE A DESPERATE BID TO REMOVE THE HONORABLE JUDGE ROBERT BROWN FROM HEARING AND DECIDING THIS DEFENDANT'S PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF.


HOLMAN WANTS TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE BROWN WHEN JUDGE BROWN REBUFFED AN ATTEMPT BY ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR,  TO IMPROPERLY INFLUENCE AND PREJUDICE THE JUDGE BY "REMINDING" HIM THAT HOLMAN HAD CONTRIBUTED TO JUDGE BROWN'S CAMPAIGN WHEN HE RAN FOR THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS.


SALISBURY APPROACHED JUDGE BROWN, AS IF TO SAY, "YOU OWE US!"


JUDGE BROWN DIDN'T BITE!


THEN, JUDGE BROWN REMINDED SALISBURY OF HIS EGREGIOUS MISCONDUCT IN A CASE RECENTLY DECIDED BY THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, STATE  v JOHNSON.  (See prior post at this blog, 9th DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS: "(COLLIER) SHOULD NOT HAVE LET (SALISBURY) GET AWAY WITH IT!" found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/09/9th-district-court-of-appeals-collier.html)


Now, in an EXTREMELY DISINGENUOUS ATTEMPT TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE BROWN, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, WHO IS UNABLE TO "INFLUENCE," MANIPULATE, AND CONTROL JUDGE BROWN, AS HE DOES LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, WROTE THE FOLLOWING IN HIS AFFIDAVIT OF DISQUALIFICATION, PROPOSING THE REMOVAL OF JUDGE BROWN FROM THE PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF FILED BY THIS DEFENDANT:

23.  At all relevant times herein, Judge Brown, inter alia, has a constitutional duty to "support the Constitution of the United States and the constitution [of the State of Ohio], to administer justice without respect to persons and faithfully and impartially and impartially to discharge and perform all duties incumbent upon him as such judge...." R.C. 3.23.  A judge must set aside his or her own moral, philosophical, religious and personal views on specific issues that are litigated in the courtroom, and only apply the existing law to the established facts of cases the judge presides over. 

WHAT A HOOT!  HOLMAN, WHO DAILY CONSPIRES WITH LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER TO DEPRIVE INNOCENT CITIZENS OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, ACTUALLY HAS THE NERVE TO CITE TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WHICH, ACCORDING TO SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, IS NO MORE THAN "A SCRAP OF PAPER."  (See prior post, LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN, SALISBURY CONSIDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION TO BE NO MORE THAN "A SCRAP OF PAPER" !, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/09/9th-district-court-of-appeals-collier.html)


HOLMAN SHOULD HAVE SENT THIS LITTLE MISSIVE TO LAPDOG COLLIER, AND PERHAPS EVEN READ IT HIMSELF!  ALTHOUGH, TO BE SURE, LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, HAS CLEARLY SET ASIDE ANY AND ALL SENSE OF MORALITY AS HE CONSPIRES WITH DINO HOMAN TO CONVICT INNOCENT CITIZENS,


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

A READER ASKS, "HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THEY DESTROYED THE EVIDENCE?"

A reader of this blog has made the specific inquiry, "Just how do you know that the Medina County prosecutor destroyed the exculpatory evidence?"

That is a question properly asked, and well deserving of an answer.

As with all such matters presented at this blog, the blogger presents facts and evidence from which reasonable inference may be drawn.

THE BLOGGER HAS CONCLUDED THAT THE CRIMINALS OPERATING OVER IN COURTROOM NO. 1 AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION HAS DESTROYED THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE DELIBERATELY AND UNLAWFULLY WITHHELD FROM THE DEFENDANT WHOSE CASE IS PROFILED AT THIS BLOG BASED UPON THE VERY WORDS OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, IN AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE THAT SALISBURY HAS SENT TO THIS BLOG.


PRESENTED BELOW IS THE PRECISE LANGUAGE, TAKEN FROM THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR'S MESSAGE:

“And can you prove these illustrious prosectors (sic) withheld evidence?You do realize if the courts were really corrupt as you have said with FACT that you say they are . . . they would have simply destroyed all proof by now.  Because the courts are not really corrupt, and the evidence that [Defendant] is not the violent felon that nearly killed his family is not and never has been in existence.”  

SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, HAS UNEQUIVOCALLY ADMITTED THAT THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE IS NO LONGER IN EXISTENCE. 



THAT IS A MAJOR ADMISSION AGAINST THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR'S SELF-INTEREST, THANK GOODNESS.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

NOTICE HOW CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN SPINS HIS CORRUPT PRACTICES IN THE MANNER OF A "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

In a prior segment of this blog, the blogger pointed out the attempts of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN to explain away his misconduct by claiming that the aggrieved defendant had simply fabricated a "conspiracy theory."

As more than one case in point, the blogger points to HOLMAN'S brief in opposition to the appeal of Audrey Iacona.  Here is a direct quote from HOLMAN'S brief, expounding his disingenuous "conspiracy theory" in that case:

``Since February 23, 1998, when she filed her motion for a new trial,'' Holman writes, ``(Iacona) has advanced an elaborate conspiracy theory which alleges that the Medina County prosecutor and his assistant prosecutors were so intent on convicting her at trial that -- with the full cooperation of the Cuyahoga County coroner and her deputy coroners, the Summit County medical examiner, the Medina County coroner, Dr. (Mark) Collin and Dr. (Paul) Gatewood -- they deliberately withheld or concealed the . . . blood culture report of Baby Boy Iacona from the defense.'

Readers will note that CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN attempts to brush away his misconduct in that case by characterizing Ms. Iacona's claims, which are undoubtedly true, as nothing more than an "elaborate conspiracy theory."

Readers may wish to refresh by reading the prior post,  A TYPICAL CASE OF HOLMAN HIDING THE EVIDENCE, found at  http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/typical-case-of-holman-hiding-evidence.html

IN FACT, ASSISTANT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, IN AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE TO THIS BLOG, HAS OPENLY ADMITTED THAT THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE REGULARLY AND ROUTINELY WITHHOLD EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO A DEFENDANT, CONTRARY TO LAW!


In his electronic message to the blog, SALISBURY has expressly stated:

“While I understand Brady v Maryland (1963) says they must do this, it is almost impossible to enforce which is why the abuse has been going on.”   

Turning now to the case being profiled at this blog. wherein this Defendant was deliberately and unlawfully deprived of a fair trial by SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AND LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DINO HOLMAN once again tries to brush away the pattern of egregious misconduct by SALISBURY AND LAPDOG COLLIER when he writes, in his brief opposing this Defendant's Petition for Post-Conviction Relief:

            “Backed into a corner on the jurisdictional nature of the limitations period under Ohio law,  [Petitioner] reaches for unsupported allegations of some kind of grand conspiracy designed to ensnarl him.  First it was the trial prosecutor and the common pleas judge who oversaw the case.  Then when the jurisdictional issue on which the petition may be dismissed arose, [Petitioner] began asserting the court reported falsified the transcript.  After accusing the court reporter of misconduct, who is next?  If You Honor finds the petition untimely without exception, is the Court part of the alleged conspiracy.  Were the Court of Appeals to affirm his conviction, are they too “in” on some kind of agreement [Petitioner] believes was entered into?  From these shifting and evolving allegations, it is clear that the focus of the allegations is inextricably related to Petitioner's needs.”

THE SIMILARITY OF THE "ARGUMENTS" IS MORE THAN TELLING.

NOW THAT HOLMAN'S DISINGENUOUS "CONSPIRACY THEORY" DEFENSE HAS APPARENTLY FAILED HIM, HE'S TRYING, AS A MATTER OF SHEER DESPERATION, TO REMOVE JUDGE BROWN FROM HEARING THE PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF, PRESENTLY BEFORE JUDGE BROWN, AN HONORABLE JUDGE.

AS A MATTER OF FACT, THIS DEFENDANT AND HIS ATTORNEYS BELIEVE THAT JUDGE ROBERT BROWN IS AN HONEST AND HONORABLE MAN, GUIDED BY THE LAW AND THE RULES OF EVIDENCE,

THAT IS THE VERY REASON THAT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN  seeks to remove Judge Brown from hearing the Defendant's Petition for Post Conviction Relief!  


HOLMAN IS UNABLE TO INFLUENCE, MANIPULATE, AND CONTROL JUDGE BROWN AS HE DOES WITH LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, TOWN WHORE, AND HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG."

THE SIMPLE AND UNASSAILABLE FACT IS THE CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS CONSPIRE ON A DAILY BASIS WITH LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER, HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG," TO DEPRIVE CITIZENS OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, AND THE RULE OF LAW!

THE ODOR OF DESPERATION IS IN THE AIR AT COURTROOM NO. 1 AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION

CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN HAS ATTEMPTED, ONCE AGAIN, TO HIDE THE EVIDENCE AND THWART THE PROPER ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE!


Just what evidence, you may ask, is CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN trying to hide now?

HOLMAN IS NOW TRYING TO HIDE EVIDENCE THAT HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANT (AN APT CHARACTERIZATION) SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AND HIS UNDERLING, LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, WITH HOLMAN'S FULL APPROVAL, HAVE DESTROYED EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, THEY CONCEALED AND WITHHELD AT TRIAL, IN ATTEMPT TO SHIELD THESE CRIMINALS, WHO OPERATE IN COURTROOM NO.1, FROM THE SANCTIONS OF THE DISCIPLINARY OFFICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO!


BIG MISTAKE!!!


DINO HOLMAN is now trying to remove an honest and honorable retired , the Honorable Judge Robert Brown from Wayne County, from hearing this Defendant's Petition for Post Conviction Relief.


IN FACT, HOLMAN IS SO DESPERATE TO AVOID AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING, HE HAD ONE OF HIS NEWBY ATTORNEYS DRIVE ALL THE WAY TO COLUMBUS TO FILE HIS "AFFIDAVIT OF DISQUALIFICATION'' OF JUDGE BROWN THE VERY DAY BEFORE THE SCHEDULED HEARING!


Why would CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN want to do that, you may ask?


Well, first of all, Judge Brown is HONEST and HOLMAN JUST CAN'T STAND THAT FACT!


Secondly, HOLMAN has had a shocking and rude awakening when he discovered that he can't influence, manipulate, and control Judge Brown, LIKE HE DOES LAPDOG COLLIER.


HOLMAN JUST CAN'T HANDLE THE FACT THAT HE HAS TO OPERATE WITHIN A FAIR FORUM IN A COURTROOM UNDER THE CONTROL OF JUDGE BROWN.


SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, CAN'T RUN ROUGHSHOD OVER JUDGE BROWN, LIKE HE DOES WITH COLLIER, WHO IS NO MORE THAN A DUPE FOR HOLMAN!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

JUST HOW MANY TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS HAVE LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER & HIS CRONIES TAMPERED WITH AND CHANGED OVER THE YEARS?

In reviewing the corrupted "official" transcript of the case being profiled here at the blog, it is interesting to note that all of the identified omissions from the transcript of the case being profiled here at this blog FAVOR LAPDOG COUNTY JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE!


HOW ABOUT THAT?  SIMPLY COINCIDENCE?  THIS BLOGGER THINKS NOT!


Given the fact that there is unequivocal proof that the "official" trial transcript has been CORRUPTED, TAMPERED WITH, AND ALTERED, a very serious question now arises.


JUST HOW MANY OTHER TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS, IN YEARS PAST, HAVE BEEN CORRUPTED, TAMPERED WITH, AND ALTERED BY THE COMMON CRIMINALS OPERATING OVER THERE IN COURTROOM NO. 1 AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION?


THIS BLOGGER BELIEVES THAT THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION IS MANY, THUS CALLING INTO QUESTION APPELLATE DECISIONS IN WHICH APPEALS HAVE BEEN DENIED,


TO BE SURE, ONLY LAPDOG COLLIER KNOWS FOR SURE!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG COLLIER TRIED TO CONCEAL HIS UNLAWFUL CONDUCT AND BIASED RULINGS FROM THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

As has been previously shown at this blog, the "official" trial transcript, in the case being profiled here at the blog, has been unlawfully tampered with, altered, and changed, OMITTING TESTIMONY AND REMARKS FROM LAPDOG COLLIER.


One of the remarks of LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, was intentionally excised from the transcript in an attempt to conceal the bias and unlawful rulings made by LAPDOG COLLIER at this Defendant's sentencing hearing!


Following this Defendant's unlawful conviction in KANGAROO COURTROOM NO. 1 at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station, presided over by LAPDOG COLLIER, Defense Counsel filed a Motion for a New Trial, which cannot be found publicly displayed at the website of the Medina County Clerk of Court BECAUSE LAPDOG COLLIER DOES NOT WANT TO REVEAL ALL OF HIS MISCONDUCT AT TRIAL, POINTED OUT IN DEFENSE COUNSEL'S BRIEF SUPPORTING THE MOTION FOR  NEW TRIAL.


At this Defendant's sentencing hearing, LAPDOG COLLIER denied the Defendant's Motion for a New Trial, as he grudgingly admitted "ALTHOUGH THERE ARE NUMEROUS GROUNDS."


That was a direct admission from LAPDOG COLLIER that he denied this Defendant's meritorious motion for a new trial in spite of the NUMEROUS GROUNDS JUSTIFYING A NEW TRIAL.


Of course, LAPDOG COLLIER'S ADMISSION THAT THIS DEFENDANT MERITS A NEW TRIAL IS  NOW CURIOUSLY MISSING FROM THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT.


WHAT A SURPRISE THAT LAPDOG COLLIER DOES NOT WANT THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS TO NOTICE THAT HE UNCONSCIONABLY AND UNLAWFULLY DENIED THIS DEFENDANT A NEW TRIAL, ALL BECAUSE OF HIS OWN SELF-SERVING DESIRE TO KEEP A FIRM GRIP ON HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH, COMPLIMENTS OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEM PARTY.


CERTAINLY, THE LAW AND THE RIGHTS OF AN INNOCENT MAN TAKE A BACK SEAT TO LAPDOG COLLIER'S OBLIGATION TO CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN TO CONVICT EVERY DEFENDANT, INNOCENT AND OTHERWISE, THAT COMES BEFORE HIM SO AS TO PRESERVE HOLMAN'S TARNISHED 98% RATE OF CONVICTION.


MUCH MORE TO COME .....