WAS LAFAYETTE TOWNSHIP BRYON MACRON MURDERED OVER $17 MILLION MISSING FROM COUNTY COFFERS IN FEDERAL TAX EVASION SCHEME INVOLVING INNOVATION PARK AND WHERE BETHANY DENTLER IS OFFERING TO GIVE INNOVATION PARK TO ANY INTERESTED PARTY FOR FREE ???

JUST WHO IS JUGGLING THE MEDINA COUNTY BOOKS, AND WHO HAS BEEN STEALING HOW MUCH MONEY???

THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION IS LIKELY TO LEAD DIRECTLY TO THE PERSON(S) WHO CAUSED THE MURDER OF LAFAYETTE TOWNSHIP TRUSTEE BRYON MACRON.

THE ANSWER, HOWEVER, IS LIKELY WELL BEYOND THE SKILLS AND ABILITIES OF THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF.

THIS ENTIRE MATTER IS A MORASS OF PUBLIC CORRUPTION, FISCAL MISMANAGEMENT, AT THE VERY LEAST, AND LIKELY GRAFT AND MISAPPROPRIATION OF LOCAL TAXPAYER DOLLARS AND FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS!

JUST WHO IS  BETHANY DENTLER, THE APPARENT DE FACTO "MAYOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE" OF MEDINA COUNTY, WHO IS IN NO MANNER OR FORM ACCOUNTABLE TO TAXPAYERS OR ELECTED COUNTY OFFICIALS.  JUST WHAT ARE DENTLER'S AUTHORITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES?  WHY IS DENTLER NOT HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR VAST SUMS OF PUBIC MONIES AT HER DISPOSAL?

HOW ABOUT THEM APPLES?  

THIS MESS IN MEDINA COUNTY GOVERNMENT, FOR WANT OF A MORE APPROPRIATE TERM, IS NOTHING SHORT OF A "CLUSTERFUCK," JUST LIKE THE SHERIFF'S PURPORTED "INVESTIGATION" OF THE HOMICIDE OF MR. MACRON. (APOLOGIES FOR FAILING TO FIND A MORE SUITABLE TERM TO DESCRIBE THE ONGOING CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE WE HAVE ALL COME TO KNOW AS MEDINA COUNTY "GOVERNMENT" - WHEN IT COMES TO PUBLIC CORRUPTION,  MEDINA COMPARES FAVORABLY WITH CUYAHOGA COUNTY.)

AS AN ASIDE, THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE IS INCAPABLE OF SOLVING MR. MACRON'S HOMICIDE WITHOUT GUIDANCE AND ASSISTANCE FROM COMPETENT, EXPERIENCED INVESTIGATORS FROM OUTSIDE MEDINA COUNTY.

DENTLER SEEMS TO BE IN AND AROUND THE CENTER, OR SO IT SEEMS, OF MUCH, BUT NOT ALL, OF QUESTIONABLE FINANCIAL DEALINGS IN MEDINA COUNTY, PARTICULARLY WHERE PUBLIC FUNDS ARE CONCERNED.  IMAGINE THAT!  

JUST WHO UNELECTED "OFFICIALS" ARE ACTUALLY RUNNING MEDINA COUNTY "GOVERNMENT" AND WHERE DID THAT AUTHORITY COME FROM?  CERTAINLY NOT THE CITIZENS OF THE COUNTY!

IN THE FUTURE INSTALLMENTS OF THIS BLOG WE WILL EXAMINE WHERE $17 MILLION OF PUBLIC FUNDS HAS GONE AND JUST WHO IS, OR IS NOT, ACCOUNTABLE!

AUTOPSY REPORT REVEALS LAFAYETTE TOWNSHIP TRUSTEE MURDERED; MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE URGES CITIZENS TO SUBMIT ANY TIPS TO SHERIFF'S SATELLITE OFFICE AT DUNKIN DONUTS !!!

THE MEDINA GASSETTE, WHERE "NO NEWS IS GOOD NEWS," FOLLOWED THE LEAD OF REAL MEDIA OUTLETS AND PUBLISHED REPORTS OF THE PRELIMINARY AUTOPSY REPORT OF LAFAYETTE TOWNSHIP TRUSTEE BRYON MACRON.

CLEVELAND MEDINA OUTLET WKYC SUED MEDINA COUNTY FOR THE RIGHT, PER THE OHIO REVISED CODE, TO REVIEW THE REPORT.  PHILANDERING, ILLEGITIMATE MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER CONDUCTED ONE OF HIS INFAMOUS "HEARINGS" AND "RULED" IN FAVOR OF WKYC.  "WEASELPECKER'S" RULING COMES AS QUITE A SURPRISE DUE TO THE FACT THAT, AS A CUSTOMARY MATTER, HE RARELY RULES IN ACCORD WITH THE LAW AND NEVER DOES THE RIGHT THING.

"WEASELPECKER" APPARENTLY FEARED AN OUT-OF-COUNTY MEDINA OUTLET WHO COULD AND WOULD DIG INTO HIS SORDID BACKGROUND AND DISCOVER HIS ILLICIT SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH HIS "OFFICIAL" COURT REPORTER (WITH BENEFITS) DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY, "WEASELPECKER'S CONSORT, PARAMOUR, MISTRESS, AND MAN SQUEEZE.  "WEASELPECKER" HAS NOT CONCERN THAT THE THE MEDIA GASSETTE WILL PUBLISH ANY ACCURATE AND TRUTHFUL INFORMATION ABOUT HIM, PRINCIPALLY BECAUSE HE HAS THREATENED TO SUE IF THEY DO!

ACCORDING TO REAL MEDIA REPORTS, MACRON SUSTAINED STAB WOUNDS TO THE NECK AND ARMS, BUT HIS AIRWAY IS REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN CLEAR OF DEBRIS AND WATER, SUGGESTING THAT DROWNIG WAS NEITHER THE CAUSE OR MANNER OF DEATH.  REAL MEDIA REPORTS DO NOT INCLUDE ANY MORE SPECIFIC DETAILS LIKE WHETHER MR. MACRON SUSTAINED ANY DEFENSIVE WOUNDS IN A STRUGGLE.

THE RELEASE OF THE AUTOPSY  REPORTS ANSWERS SOME QUESTIONS, BUT RAISES MANY MORE!

WHERE'S THE MURDER WEAPON?  READERS MAY WISH TO CONSIDER THIS A TIP FOR SHERIFF'S DEFECTIVES: LOOK FOR THE MURDER WEAPON AT THE BOTTOM OF THE LAKE IN THE VICINITY OF THE OPEN WATER WHERE THE BODY WAS DEPOSITED!  THIS IS NOT EXACTLY ROCKET SCIENCE.  A LITTLE COMMON SENSE WILL DO QUITE NICELY IN THIS REGARD.  SIMPLY SUMMON THE SHERIFF'S "DIVE TEAM" FROM DUNKIN DONUTS AND INSTRUCT  THEM TO DO A LITTLE SWIMMING.  IT'S REALLY NOT THAT COLD!

WHY DID THE SHERIFF BAR THE LAFAYETTE FIRE CHIEF FROM SEARCHING THE OPEN WATER OF CHIPPEWA LAKE ON THE DATE OF THE MURDER?  WAS IT SIMPLY SHEER STUPIDITY (YOU CAN EVER RULE THIS OUT WHEN CONSIDERING THE ACTIONS OF THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT), OR WAS THERE SOMETHING MORE SINISTER AT WORK?  FBI AGENTS MAY EVENTUALLY FIGURE THIS OUT IN DUE COURSE,

WHAT ABOUT INNOVATION PARK?  ALONGSIDE THE ARTICLE ABOUT MR. MACRON'S AUTOPSY REPORT, THE MEDINA GASSETTE PUBLISHED A FEEL-GOOD ARTICLE ABOUT HOW MEDINA COUNTY IS PREPARED TO CEDE 8 ACRES OF INNOVATION PARK, A BOONDOGGLE OF THE HIGHEST ORDER, TO LAFAYETTE TOWNSHIP WHERE, COINCIDENTALLY OR NOT, MR. MACRON WAS A TRUSTEE.

DID MR. MACRON LEARN OF FISCAL IRREGULARITIES IN THE "TRANSFER" AND WAS HE PREPARED TO BLOW THE WHISTLE?  

WHAT DID MR. MACRON KNOW AND WHO OR WHAT WAS HE PREPARED TO EXPOSE?

INNOVATION PARK, IT IS SAID, WAS DEVELOPED USING FEDERAL GRANT MONEY (UNCONFIRMED).  IF SO, DID MR. MACRON STUMBLE UPON INFORMATION THAT MEDINA COUNTY'S FIBER OPTIC NETWORK (ANOTHER GIGANTIC FLOP) IS REPORTEDLY BEING OPERATED WITHIN THE ONLY FACILITIES LOCATED IN INNOVATION PARK, SPECIFICALLY AKRON UNIVERSITY BUILDINGS?

IF IT IS TRUE THAT THE FIBER OPTIC NETWORK (THE OWNERSHIP  OF WHICH IS REALLY CLOUDED BY A NUMBER OF QUASI-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS [MEDINA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION] NOT RESPONSIBLE TO THE CITIZENRY WITH NO OVERSIGHT AND NO PUBLICLY AVAILABLE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS), DOES THE OPERATION OF THE FIBER OPTIC NETWORK ON THE PREMISES OF THE AKRON UNIVERSITY CONSTITUTE A BREACH OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF FEDERAL GRANT(S)?

A COUPLE OF MILLION DOLLARS IN GRANT MONEY, SOME OF WHICH WAS LIKELY MISAPPROPRIATED (AFTER ALL, THIS IS MEDINA COUNTY - OTHERWISE KNOWN AS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, SOUTH) WOULD SEEM TO PROVIDE A MOTIVE FOR MURDER.  PEOPLE HAVE KILLED FOR MUCH LESS!

WHAT ABOUT THOSE TRACKS ACROSS THE ICE AND SNOW ON CHIPPEWA LAKE  LEADING TO OPEN WATER THAT THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE FAILED TO "OBSERVE?" MR. MACRON IS DESCRIBED AS WEIGHING 290 POUNDS!

READERS CAN BE ASSURED THAT THE OFFENDER(S) DIDN'T JUST HEAVE MR. MACRON'S BODY INTO THE CENTER OF CHIPPEWA LAKE FROM THE PARKING LOT WHERE HIS VEHICLE WAS RECOVERED.  IT LIKELY REQUIRED TWO OFFENDERS TO CONVEY THE BODY TO THE CENTER OF THE LAKE, UNLESS ONE PARTICULARLY POWERFUL OFFENDER SIMPLY DRAGGED THE BODY ACROSS THE SNOW AND ICE COVERED LAKE.  IF SO, WHAT ABOUT THE DRAG MARKS AND BLOOD TRAIL?

SOMETHING IS ROTTEN IN DENMARK . . . ACTUALLY IN MEDINA COUNTY!

ACCORDING TO PUBLISHED REPORTS, THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT IS SOLICITING INFORMATION AND TIPS ABOUT THE PSYCHOPATH(S) WHO MURDERED MR. MACRON.

CITIZENS CAN SUBMIT TIPS TO THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S PERSONNEL AT DUNKIN DONUTS!

MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF APPEALS TO OHIO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FOR COSTS INCURRED ENFORCING THE CHICKENSHIT ACT OF 2016

RECENT LATE BREAKING NEWS FROM COLUMBUS REVEALS THE GARY MOHR, THE DIRECTOR OF THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ANNOUNCED A RECENT PROGRAM TO COMPENSATE OHIO COUNTIES IN THE AMOUNT OF $23.00 PER EACH INDIVIDUAL A COUNTY SENTENCES TO COMMUNITY CONTROL RATHER THAN SENTENCING AN INDIVIDUAL TO PRISON.  THE INITIATIVE IS DESIGNED TO CUT THE COSTS OF MAINTAINING THE PRISON SYSTEM AND TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF INMATES IN THE CUSTODY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

IN THE BLOGGER'S ESTIMATION, THIS IS A GOOD START, BUT THE INITIATIVE DOESN'T GO QUITE FAR ENOUGH. THE PREFERABLE CHANGE WOULD BE TO BILL EACH OHIO COUNTY FOR THE COSTS BORNE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FOR EACH AND EVERY INMATE A COUNTY SHIPS OFF TO PRISON.

THAT SYSTEM WOULD SEE A DRASTIC REDUCTION OF IMPRISONMENT FOR ALL OF THE INDIVIDUALS CONVICTED IN CHICKENSHIT CASES IN THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM THAT MORONS LIKE PHILANDERING, ILLEGITIMATE "jUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER DELIGHT IN SENDING TO PRISON AFTER DEPRIVING THEM OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS AND FAIR TRIALS.

SPEAKING OF CHICKENSHIT, THE RECENT INITIATIVE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS HAS SPURRED THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF (WHO LACKS THE CAPACITY TO FOLLOW FOOTPRINTS IN THE SNOW) TO APPLY TO THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ENFORCEMENT OF RECENTLY ENACTED LEGISLATION, THE CHICKENSHIT ACT OF 2106.

FOR READERS UNFAMILIAR WITH THE CHICKENSHIT ACT OF 2016, READERS MAY REFER TO A PRIOR POST AT THIS BLOG CAPTIONED 2016 OHIO LEGISLATIVE HIGHLIGHTS: FREE RANGE CHICKENS BANNED! easily found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2017/01/2016-ohio-legislative-highlights-free.html FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION.

SUBSEQUENT TO THE PASSAGE OF THE ACT, THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF HAS FORMED A NEW UNIT, THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CHICKENSHIT SQUAD, AN ELITE GROUP OF PERSONNEL, KNOWN SIMPLY TO THEIR COMRADES AS THE "CHICKENSHITS."

THE SHERIFF'S "CHICKENSHITS" HAVE BEEN SCOURING THE HIGHWAYS AND BYWAYS OF MEDINA COUNTY, KEEPING COUNTY RESIDENTS SAFE BY SCOOPING UP ALL OF THOSE FELONIOUS FREE RANGE CHICKENS AND GATHERING CHICKEN DROPPINGS AS EVIDENCE OF THE VIOLATIONS OF LAW BY FREE RANGE CHICKENS.

NOW ALL OF THAT EVIDENCE HAS TO GO SOMEWHERE FOR TESTING TO ASSURE THAT THE CHICKEN DROPPINGS ARE TRULY CHICKEN DROPPINGS, AS OPPOSED TO DROPPINGS FROM DUCKS OR GEESE OR OTHER BIRDS OF THE AIR.

THE SHERIFF'S "CHICKENSHIT SQUAD", EXERCISING FASTIDIOUS ATTENTION TO DETAIL, NOT NORMALLY FOUND AT THE MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, BAG AND TAG THE ALLEGED CHICKENSHIT AND DAILY TRANSPORT THE "EVIDENCE" TO THE BCI LABORATORY IN RICHFIELD, WITH LIGHTS FLASHING AND SIRENS WAILING.

MEMBERS OF THE "CHICKENSHIT SQUAD" TURN THE CHICKEN DROPPINGS OVER, HAND-TO-HAND, TO BCI AGENT RICHARD "DICK" WARNER WHO HAS BEEN REASSIGNED FROM TASTE-TESTING OLD RAPE KITS IN CUYAHOGA COUNTY TO TASTE-TESTING CHICKEN DROPPINGS GATHERED UP BY THE SHERIFF'S "CHICKENSHITS."

"DICK" WARNER HAS BECOME SO POPULAR WITH MEMBERS OF THE "CHICKENSHIT SQUAD" THAT THEY CONSIDER HIM TO BE JUST ANOTHER "CHICKENSHIT."

THE SHERIFF HAS INCURRED ADDITIONAL EXPENSE BY QUARANTINING THE SEIZED CHICKENS, HENS AND ROOSTERS, AT THE POPEYE'S CHICKEN RESTAURANT LOCATED IN WESTFIELD CENTER.

AS NOTED IN A PRIOR POST AT HIS BLOG, CITED ABOVE, PHILANDERING, ILLEGITIMATE "jUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER HAS BEEN DESIGNATED AS THE CHICKENSHIT JUDGE OF THE CHICKENSHIT DIVISION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS AND HANDLES EVEN MORE CHICKENSHIT CASES THAN HIS NORMAL CASE LOAD.

RECENTLY, HOWEVER, "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER HAS COME UNDER FIRE FOR SENTENCING HENS TO DEATH  WHILE SPARING ROOSTERS THE SAME FATE, SENTENCING THEM TO PROBATION AND FOR ADOPTION BY INMATES AT THE MEDINA COUNTY JAIL.  "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER, IN HIS OWN DEFENSE, IS QUOTED AS SAYING, "THEY DO IT ALL THE TIME WITH DOGS. WHY NOT CHICKENS?"

"WEASELPECKER" FAILS TO GRASP THE GRAVITY OF THE CRITICISM. AS POINTED OUT IN A PRIOR POST AT THE BLOG, CAPTIONED "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER SLIPS A LITTLE COCK TO HIS "OFFICIAL" COURT REPORTER (WITH BENEFITS) FOR VALENTINE'S DAY ! easily found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2017/02/weaselpecker-collier-slips-little-cock.html ,
"WEASELPECKER" IS A CONFIRMED "ROOSTER (COCK) SUCKER"  WITH A DEFINITE PREFERENCE FOR COCKS. 

PETA (PEOPLE FOR ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS) HAS LODGED A FORMAL PROTEST AND ADOPTED THE POSITION THAT A CONFIRMED "ROOSTER (COCK) SUCKER" SHOULD BE BARRED FROM SENTENCING HENS TO EXECUTION AT POPEYE'S CHICKEN RESTAURANT!

PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY ! HAZMAT AND PARANORMAL TEAMS CALLED IN TO INVESTIGATE EVIDENCE OF PARANORMAL ACTIVITY AT THE MEDINA COUTY COURTHOUSE, MOSQUE, BROTHEL & RAILROAD STATION !

THE MEDINA COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, MANAGED BY SOME UNQUALIFIED POLITICAL APPOINTEE WHO LIKELY KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT MANAGING AN EMERGENCY, HAS DECLARED A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY.

IT SEEMS THAT CUSTODIAL STAFF AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE, MOSQUE, BROTHEL & RAILROAD STATION HAVE ENCOUNTERED THE REEMERGENCE OF PECKER TRACKS IN THE CHAMBERS OF PHILANDERING, ILLEGITIMATE "jUDGE WEAELPECKER" COLLIER AFTR A LONG HIATUS OF SUCH SIGHTINGS.

REGULAR READERS OF THIS BLOG WILL RECALL THAT MORE THAN 2 YEARS AGO THE BLOGGER REPORTED THE EMERGENCE OF PECKER TRACKS ON "WEASELPECKER'S" DESK IN HIS CHAMBERS AT HIS KANGAROO COURTROOM #1.  READERS MAY REFRESH AT A PRIOR MARCH 2, 2015 POST AT THIS BLOG CAPTIONED

WILDLIFE OFFICERS ON HIGH ALERT ! easily found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2015/03/wildlife-officers-on-high-alert.html

MUCH WATER HAS GONE OVER THE DAM IN THE INTERVENING TWO YEARS, INCLUDING THE FACT THAT "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER REPLACED, TEMPORARILY AT LEAST, DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY WITH HIS "OFFICIAL ASSISTANT COURT REPORTER.

MORE RECENTLY, HOWEVER, GARRITY, "WEASELPECKER'S" CONSORT, PARAMOUR, MISTRESS, AND MAIN SQUEEZE, HAS APPARENTLY "RESUMED" HER OFFICIAL DUTIES "UNDER" "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER.

COINCIDENTALLY, PECKER TRACKS HAVE MYSTERIOUSLY REAPPEARED IN "WEASELPECKER'S" CHAMBERS.

RECENTLY, CUSTODIAL STAFF ENCOUNTERED ANOTHER SERIES OF PECKER TRACKS ACROSS THE SURFACE OF "WEASELPECKER'S" DESK, ALONG WITH A QUANTITY OF AN UNKNOWN SUBSTANCE THAT HAD POOLED ON A DEFENSE BRIEF.  NO HARM DONE THERE AS FAR AS THE DEFENSE BRIEF IS CONCERNED. "WEASELPECKER" NEVER READS THEM ANYWAY, AS IF HE CAN READ AT ALL.

THE MANAGER OF BUILDING SERVICES WAS CALLED TO THE SCENE AND, AFTER A BRIEF INSPECTION, IMMEDIATELY CALLED IN HAZMAT AND PARANORMAL TEAMS TO INVESTIGATE, WHILE QUARANTINING KANGAROO COURTROOM #1.

AFTER COLLECTING SPECIMEN SAMPLES, THE PARANORMAL TEAM IDENTIFIED THE RECOVERED SUBSTANCE AS ECTOPLASM, A MYSTERIOUS SUBSTANCE SOMEHOW RELATED TO GHOSTLY APPARITIONS.

THE INTERVIEW OF A RENOWNED BRITISH PARANORMAL EXPERT, BELOW, EXPOUNDS THE MATTER OF ECTOPLASM.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOpAjLstDzo&app=desktop

ONE THING IS CERTAIN, "WEASELPECKER'S" CHAMBERS CAN BE REALLY SPOOKY . . . AND STICKY AS WELL!

SLUG MEDINA MUNI JUDGE DALE CHASE EXPOSED AS LODI SLUMLORD !

FROM AN ONLINE ARTICE PUBLISHED BY THE MEDINA GASSETTE ON JANUARY 21, 2017, FOUND AT http://www.medina-gazette.com/Medina-County/2017/01/21/First-interview-with-new-Medina-County-Prosecutor-S-Forrest-Thompson.html

[Medina County Prosecutor Forrest]Thompson said he also has long been concerned about financial exploitation of the elderly; he worked on a number of civil cases in his private law practice. 

“My personal opinion is that a civil remedy is inadequate,” he said. “When people exploit the elderly, they should be held criminally accountable.”

MR. THOMPSON SHOULD CONSIDER SLUG MEDINA MUNI JUDGE DALE CHASE, A LODI SLUMLORD, FOR REVIEW IN THE MATTER OF EXPLOITING THE ELDERLY, SPECIFICALLY AN 85-YEAR-OLD MARRIED COUPLE LIVING IN A DECREPIT SLUM IN THE VILLAGE OF LODI OWNED BY CHASE.

THE HOVEL, OWNED BY CHASE, IS BELIEVED TO HAVE BEEN BUILT IN 1895 AND HASN'T SEEN ONE LICK OF UPGRADE SINCE, SO IT SEEMS.

CHASE'S RAT HOLE, WHICH HE PASSES OFF AS AN "INHABITABLE DWELLING," IS A "DUPLEX" (SIDE BY SIDE) FOR WHICH HE CHARGES THE 85-YEAR-OLD COUPLE IN THE AMOUNT OF $600.00 RENT PER MONTH.

SLUGLORD CHASE CHARGES THE OTHER TENANT IN THE SAME AMOUNT.

WHAT THAT MEANS IS THAT SLUGLORD CHASE IS CHARGING THE ELDERLY COUPLE $7,200.00 PER ANNUM TO LIVE IN THIS DUMP!

WHEN TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE CHARGES TO THE OTHER TENNANT IN THE SAME AMOUNT, SLUGLORD CHASE IS CHARGING TENANTS OF THIS SHITHOLE AN ANNUAL AMOUNT OF $14,400.00.

THE FACT THAT SLUGLORD CHASE IS GOUGING THIS ELDERLY COUPLE IS NOT THE WORST OF IT.

ACCORDING TO FAMILY MEMBERS OF THE 85-YEAR-OLD COUPLE, THEY HAVE REQUESTED SLUGLORD CHASE TO MAKE REPAIRS FOR THE PAST TWENTY YEARS.

THE FAMILY REPORTS THAT, WITHIN THOSE PAST TWENTY YEARS, SLUGLORD CHASE HAS IGNORED THOSE REQUESTS AND HAS NOT MADE ONE SINGLE REQUESTED REPAIR.

:THE MEDINA HORROR PICTURE SHOW" - PART 2; "LAW ? WHAT LAW ?" ASKS "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER..OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

IN A PRIOR POST AT THIS BLOCK, THE BLOGGER CITED TO THE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OF "jUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER FILED IN THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.  

IN THAT POST, THE BLOGGER POINTED OUT THAT "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER VIOLATED NEARLY ALL THE RULES GOVERNING COURTROOM PROCEDURE, ALL IN THE EFFORT TO UNLAWFULLY CONVICT A FACTUALLY INNOCENT CITIZEN.

"WEASELPECKER'S" DELIBERATE RULES VIOLATIONS ONLY TELL ONE-HALF OF THE STORY.

IN THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE (OBVIOUSLY NOT INCLUDING MEDINA COUNTY), STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS OF APPEAL, INCLUDING THE UNITED STATES AND OHIO SUPREME COURTS, HAVE INTERPRETED THE CONSTITUTION(S) AND APPLIED THOSE INTERPRETATIONS TO A MYRIAD NUMBER OF CASES, ESTABLISHING A BODY OF PRECEDENT THAT LOWER COURTS ARE BOUND TO FOLLOW.  OBVIOUSLY, "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER SEEMS TO OVERLOOK THAT PROVISO OF THE LAW.

SHOWN BELOW, TAKEN FROM THE  COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OF "jUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER FILED IN THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO, IDENTIFY SOME, BUT NOT ALL, OF THE
CONTROLLING DECISIONS OF THE SUPERIOR  COURTS, INCLUDING THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, THAT "WEASELPECKER" DELIBERATELY IGNORED.

 Collier’s rulings ignored and contravened the prevailing law, including precedents and holdings of the United States Supreme Court, despite having been fully briefed on the law by defense counsel. 

The prosecutor cited no law during these proceedings. Following are some, but not all, of the cases that Collier, despite having been fully briefed on them, simply ignored in “fixing” this case for the county prosecutor:

Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 635 (1886)

         - “Constitutional provisions for the security of person and property should          be liberally construed. *** It is the duty of the courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon.”

Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 403-406 (1965)

         - The right of cross-examination, guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial

Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)

         - Evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment is not admissible at trial

Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 586 (1980)

         - “When police conduct a warrantless search, the state bears the burden of establishing the validity of the search.”

Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S.14 (1967)

         - Sixth Amendment right of a defendant to compulsory process extends to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment

Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 61-62 (2004)

         -  “The Confrontation Clause commands, not that the evidence be reliable, but that reliability be assessed in a particular manner: by testing in the crucible of cross-examination.”

Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315-318 (1974)

         - Denial of the “right of effective cross-examination” is “constitutional error of the first magnitude” requiring automatic reversal

Sparf v. United States, 156 U.S. 51 (1895)

         - It is the duty of the court (not the prosecutor) to expound the law, and the jury to apply the facts to the law, otherwise the stability of justice and personal rights are jeopardized

Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133 (2005)

         - “It is…elementary law, federal and state, that the judge bears ultimate responsibility for instructing a lay jury in the law.”

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)

         - State’s obligation to disclose information and evidence favorable to the defendant

United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 104 (1976)

         - “… the Court has consistently held that a conviction obtained by the     knowing use of perjured testimony is fundamentally unfair,[Footnote 8] and must be set aside if there is any reasonable likelihood that the false testimony could have affected the judgment of the jury.”

United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, Fn 7 (1976), citing Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U.S. 103

         - Due process of law “cannot be deemed to be satisfied by mere notice and hearing if a state has contrived a conviction through the pretense of a trial which in truth is but used as a means of depriving a defendant of liberty through a deliberate deception of court and jury by the presentation of testimony known to be perjured. Such a contrivance by a state to procure the conviction and imprisonment of a defendant is inconsistent with the rudimentary demands of justice as is the obtaining of a like result by intimidation.”

United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, Fn 8 (1985)

         - “…the Brady rule has its roots in a series of cases dealing with convictions based on the prosecution's knowing use of perjured testimony. In Mooney v. Holohan, (1935), the Court established the rule that the knowing use by a state prosecutor of perjured testimony  to obtain a conviction and the deliberate suppression of evidence that would have impeached and refuted the testimony constitutes a denial          of due process.”

Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293, 307 (1966)]

         - Government invasion of the defense camp compels conviction to be set aside as constitutionally defective

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 241 (1983)

         - Probable cause, to be determined on the totality of the circumstances, requires corroboration of a tip by independent police work/investigation

Whiteley v. Warden, 401 U.S. 560 (1971)

         - Criminal complaint not setting out a statement of essential facts does not pass constitutional muster

Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721, 724 (1969)

         - There is no exception to the rule that evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible at trial

Gray v. Mississippi, 481 U.S. 648, 668 (1987)

         - “We have recognized that "some constitutional rights [are] so basic to a fair trial that their infraction can never be treated as harmless error." Chapman v. California, 386 U.S., at 23. The right to an impartial adjudicator, be it judge or jury, is such a right.”

Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 172-173 (1997)

         - “As to a criminal defendant, Rule 403's term "unfair prejudice" speaks to the capacity of some concededly relevant evidence to lure the fact finder into declaring guilt on an improper basis rather than on proof specific to the offense charged. Such improper grounds certainly include generalizing from a past bad act that a defendant is by propensity the probable perpetrator of the current crime. Thus, Rule 403 requires that the relative probative value of prior conviction evidence be balanced against its prejudicial risk of misuse. A judge should balance these factors not only for the item in question but also for any actually available substitutes. If an alternative were found to have substantially the same or greater probative value but a lower danger of unfair prejudice, sound judicial discretion would discount the value of the item first offered and exclude it if its discounted probative value were substantially outweighed by unfairly prejudicial risk. Pp. 180-185.”

Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, at 14 (2006)

         - “Through the in limine procedure, the (courts) should redact or exclude the portions of any statement that have become testimonial, as they do, for example, with unduly prejudicial portions of otherwise admissible evidence.”

Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40 (1980)

         - Individual cannot be compelled to testify against a spouse

Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, at syllabus ¶ 2

         - “Criminal defendants have the right under the Compulsory Process     Clause to the government’s assistance in compelling the attendance of  favorable witnesses at trial, and the right to put before a jury evidence that might influence the determination of guilt.”

Holloway v. Florida, 449 U.S. 905, 907 (1980)

         - “Thus the Court more than once has expressed the understanding     that a lesser-included-offense (instruction) minimizes the risk of    undermining the reasonable-doubt standard.”

Sansone v. United States, 330 U.S. 343, 349 (1965)

         - “In a case where some elements of the crime charged themselves constitute a lesser crime, if the evidence justified it, would no doubt be entitled to an instruction which would permit a finding of guilt of the lesser offense.”

State v. Morris, 2007-Ohio-3591, at ¶ 37

         - In the prosecution for alleged violations of 2911.11 ORC, “due process requires that the particularized nature of the accused’s   conduct includes the behavior that demonstrates he committed an underlying offense.”

State v. Hous, 2004-Ohio-666, at ¶ 11

         -  “…jury instructions given at the end of a trial cannot relate back to give an accused adequate notice of the charges against which an accused must defend….”

State v. Hubbard, 2004-Ohio-5204, at ¶ 6

         - “Under Evid.R. 602, a witness may testify only to those matters of which he has personal knowledge…gained through firsthand observation or experience and actually perceived the subject matter of his testimony.”

State v. Taylor, (1993) 66 Ohio St. 3d 295, 300-301

         - “For a purported excited utterance to be admissible there must have been: …(4) the declarant must have personally observed the event.”

Cox v. Oliver Machinery Co., (1987) 41 Ohio App. 3d 28, at 35-36

         - “The key to the statement’s trustworthiness is the spontaneity of the statement, either contemporaneous with the event or immediately thereafter.”

State v. Mitchell, 2007-Ohio-1696, at ¶ 19

         - “The Ohio Supreme Court has recently affirmed that recordings of 911 calls that were made to avoid immediate danger are not testimonial and do not violate the Confrontation Clause when the declarant is not available to testify at trial.”

State v. Henness (1997), 79 Ohio St. 3d 53, ¶ 1 of the syllabus

         - “…the testifying spouse remains incompetent *** until she makes a deliberate choice to testify, with knowledge of her right to refuse. The trial court must take an active role in determining competency, and must make an affirmative determination on the record that the spouse has elected to testify.”

State v. Hunt (1994), 97 Ohio App. 3d 372, holding that a cross-examiner    may not make testimonial assertions under the pretext of asking a question

GIVEN ALL OF THE HOLDINGS AND DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ("U. S." CITATIONS) TO WHICH "WEASELPECKER" TURNED A BLIND EYE, ANY DISINTERESTED PERSON WOULD SUSPECT THAT PHILANDERING, ILLEGITIMATE "jUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER IS UNDER THE MISTAKEN IMPRESSION THAT MEDINA COUNTY HAS SECEDED FROM THE UNION OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES DOES NOT CONTROL PROCEEDINGS IN THE "COURTS" OF THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM!

NOW, READERS MAY BE UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER IS IGNORANT OF THE LAW.  WHILE THAT IS UNABASHEDLY TRUE THAT "WEASELPECKERIS AN IGNORANT BASTARD, PARTICULARLY IN MATTERS PERTAINING TO THE LAW, "WEASELECKER" WAS BRIEFED ON EACH OF THE ABOVE-CASES IN THE CASE BEFORE HIM. 

IGNORANCE OF THE LAW BY "WEASELPECKER"

COLLIER IS NO DEFENSE TO PUBLIC

CORRUPTION !!!

NO ONE CAN DISPUTE THE FACT THAT 

"WEASELPECKER" COLLIER IS A CORRUPT "PUBLIC 

"OFFICIAL" AND A CROOK !!!

EXCLUSIVE! JUST IN PHOTOS OF "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER'S 2017 SWEARING-IN CEREMONY

"WEASELPECKER" COLLIER'S "OFFICIAL" COURT REPORTER (WITH BENEFITS), CONSORT, PARAMOUR, MISTRESS, MAIN SQUEEZE, AND HIS CAMPAIGN MANAGER DONA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY HAS JUST RELEASED EXCLUSIVE PHOTOS OF "WEASELPECKER'S" 2017 SWEARING-IN CEREMONY TO THE MEDINA GASSETTE, WHERE "NO NEWS IS GOOD NEWS!"

REGULAR READERS OF THIS BLOG ARE NOW TREATED TO A PICTORIAL DELIGHT OF THOSE FESTIVITIES AND THE GALA  EVENTS FOLLOWING.

SHOWN BELOW IS "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER "SALUTING" HIS SUPPORTERS FROM THE PUBIC WING OF THE MEDINA REPUBLIKKKRAT PARTY AS HE APPROACHES THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE, MOSQUE, BROTHEL & RAILROAD STATION PRIOR TO THE SWEARING-IN CEREMONIES.

SHOWN BELOW IS THE RECEPTION COMMITTEE, ASSEMBLED ON THE STEPS OF THE COURTHOUSE, MOSQUE, BROTHEL & RAILROAD STATION, AWAITING "WEASELPECKER'S" ARRIVAL AND PREPARED TO ESCORT HIM TO THE CEREMONIES TO BE HELD WITHIN.

ONCE THE CROWD HAD SETTLED IN, "WEASELPECKER' COLLIER PLACED HIS HAND ON HIS PERSONAL BIBLE.

FOLLOWING THESE SOLEMN PROCEEDINGS, "WEASELPECKER' COLLIER LED A CONTINGENT OF HIS SUPPORTERS FROM THE PUBIC WING OF THE MEDINA COUNTY REPUBLIKKKRAT PARTY.

MANY OF THE UNINFORMED AND APATHETIC MEDINA COUNTY VOTERS FOLLOWED "WEASELECKER" COLLIER IN PROCESSION TO THE GALA FOLLOWING THE SWEARING-IN CEREMONIES.

EVEN MEMBERS OF THE YOUNG PUBICS  ORGANIZATION WERE IN ATTENDANCE.

THE EVENTS OF THE DAY WERE COVERED IN FULL BY "REPORTERS" FROM THE MEDINA GASSETTE WHERE "NO NEWS IS GOOD NEWS."

THE DAY'S FESTIVITIES WERE CAPPED OFF WITH A WIENER AND MARSHMALLOW ROAST ATTENDED BY "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER'S MOST ARDENT SUPPORTERS FROM THE PUBIC WING OF THE MEDINA REPUBLIKKKRAT PARTY.

TO CELEBRATE THIS SPECIAL DAY, "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER PRESENTED DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY, HIS "OFFICIAL" COURT REPORTER (WITH BENEFITS), CONSORT, PARAMOUR, MISTRESS AND MAIN SQUEEZE, WITH A VERY SPECIAL GIFT TO COMMEMORATE HIS VERY SPECIAL DAY, CELEBRATING HIS VICTORY OVER THE UNINFORMED AND APATHETIC ELECTORATE OF MEDINA COUNTY.

FIRSTLY, "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER GIFTED GARRITY WITH A CURIO OF SORTS, A TOKEN GRAB BAG TO MEMORIALIZE HIS "SPECIAL" DAY.

THEN, BESIDES THE GAG GIFT, SHOWN ABOVE, "WEASELPECKER" GIFTED GARRITY WITH A MORE PERSONALIZED GIFT.

"WEASELPECKER" GIFTED GARRITY, HIS "OFFICIAL" COURT REPORTER (WITH BENEFITS) A PAIR OF CROTCHLESS PANTIES SO THAT HE CAN LOOK DOWN AT GARRITY FROM THE BENCH AND BE REMINDED OF HIS GLORIOUS SWEARING-IN CEREMONY WITH EACH AND EVERY GLANCE !!!