THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM IS THE GOLD STANDARD FOR CONFLICT OF INTEREST

THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM ESTABLISHES THE GOLD STANDARD FOR CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, ORIGINATING WITH THE CRIMINAL SYNDICATE OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN (WITH EMPHASIS ON "HOE").

SIR WALTER SCOTT FIRST GAVE VOICE TO THE IDIOM, "WHAT A TANGLED WEB WE WEAVE WHEN FIRST WE PRACTISE TO DECEIVE."

THERE ARE MANY TWISTS AND TURNS, A VERITABLE TANGLED WEB,  TO BE FOUND IN THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME EXECUTED BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN AND HIS MEDINA MOB.  THE BLOGGER WILL HERE ATTEMPT TO UNRAVEL SOME OF THEM FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE READER.

LET'S EXAMINE THE FACTS PERTAINING TO THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME ORCHESTRATED BY DINO HE-MAN, THE "GODFATHER" OF MEDINA ORGANIZED CRIME.

TO START REASONABLY AT THE BEGINNING, HOE-MAN AND MEMBERS OF HIS MEDINA MOB  ROBBED THE GRAVE OF A LOCAL CITIZEN AND RAPED AND PILLAGED HIS ESTATE, DEFRAUDING THE HEIRS TO THE ESTATE OF THEIR RIGHTFUL INHERITANCE AND DEFRAUDING THE STATE OF OHIO AND THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OF TAXES REVENUES RIGHTLY OWED.

NOW, HOW MIGHT YOU THE READER ASK, DID THESE LOW-LIFE SCUMBAGS DEFRAUD THE TAX MAN?   THAT ANSWER IS REALLY STRAIGHTFORWARD.

MEDINA COUNTY AUDITOR MIKE "THE PERV" KOVACK SUBSTANTIALLY UNDERVALUED ESTATE ASSETS.  ACCORDING TO A VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME, THE ACTUAL VALUE OF THE ESTATE AT THE DECEDENT'S TIME OF DEATH WAS APPROXIMATELY $2.5 MILLION.

ACCORDING TO THE VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME, THE COUNTY AUDITOR VALUED THE ESTATE AT $9,OOO.OO.

WOW!  THAT'S QUITE A DEPRECIATION, EVEN BY MEDINA COUNTY STANDARDS.

THAT VALUATION, OF COURSE, DOES NOT INCLUDE A VALUATION OF THE DECEDENT'S RESIDENCE, ORIGINALLY VALUED AT $800,000 WHICH MIKE "THE PERV" KOVACK REVALUED AT $300,000.  THERE MUST HAVE BEEN QUITE A FEW LOOSE SHINGLES ON THE ROOF OF THE HOUSE!

THE BLOGGER BELIEVES WE CAN ALL SEE THAT THE AVOIDANCE OF ESTATE AND CAPITAL GAINS TAXES ON OVER $2 MILLION IS QUITE A WINDFALL TO THE ESTATE AND THE ONE HEIR TO THE ESTATE , A CO-CONSPIRATOR, WHO HAS BENEFITED GREATLY FROM ALL OF THIS FRAUDULENT ACTIVITY.

HAVING NOW ESTABLISHED THAT MEDINA COUNTY AUDITOR MIKE "THE PERV" KOVACK, WHO BELONGS TO THE DEMOCRAT WING OF THE MEDINA REPUBLICRAT PARTY, FACILITATED A SUBSTANTIAL TAX FRAUD (VIOLATIONS OF STATE AND FEDERAL LAW) THE QUESTION NOW ARISES AS TO HOW MUCH OF A KICKBACK DID MIKE "THE PERV" KOVACK RECEIVE FOR HIS ROLE IN THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME?  THE BLOGGER SUSPECTS IT WAS PLENTY.

IN ORDER TO PREVENT THE RIGHTFUL HEIRS FROM SEEKING A LAWFUL DISTRIBUTION FROM THE ASSETS OF THE ESTATE, ENTERS ANOTHER LOW-LIFE SCUMBAG ATTORNEY, MARK BERNLOHR, ARGUABLY ANOTHER MEMBER OF DINO HOE-MAN'S MEDINA MOB.

BERNLOHR WENT BEFORE CORRUPT MEDINA DOMESTIC RELATIONS JUDGE MARY KOVACK AND APPLIED FOR A CIVIL PROTECTION ORDER (CPO) SEEKING TO PREVENT THE RIGHTFUL HEIRS FROM SEEKING JUSTICE, WHICH BERNLOHR AND A NUMBER OF LOW-LIFE SCUMBAG ATTORNEYS LATER  PRESENTED AN EX PARTE "STIPULATED" INJUNCTION TO LOW-LIFE SCUMBAG ILLEGITIMATE AND PHILANDERING "jUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER, WHO WAS ONLY TOO HAPPY TO UNLAWFULLY IMPOSE THIS UNLAWFUL DOCUMENT.

AT THE CPO HEARING, THE VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME WAS "REPRESENTED" BY LOCAL JAGOFF ATTORNEY STEVE BAILEY, THE BAG MAN OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN.  IN ANOTHER TYPICAL MEDINA COUNTY CONFLICT OF INTEREST, WHILE BAILEY PURPORTEDY REPRESENTED THIS VICTIM AT THE CPO HEARING, AT THE SAME TIME HE WAS REPRESENTING MEDINA COUNTY AUDITOR MIKE "THE PERVE" KOVACK, WHO WAS, AND IS, INVOLVED IN THIS FRAUD SCHEME.  JUST WHO WAS BAILEY REPRESENTING AT THE CPO HEARING, THE VICTIM OR KOVACK, THE OFFENDER?

 THE CPO HEARING WAS HELD BEFORE CORRUPT JUDGE MARY KOVACK, WHO JUST HAPPENS TO BE THE EX-WIFE OF COUNTY AUDITOR MIKE "THE PERV" KOVACK. DURING THE CPO HEARING, ACCORDING TO WITNESES,  SCUMBAGE BERNLOHR PRESENTED ARGUMENT, BUT NO PROOF, THAT WOULD WARRANT THE ISSUE OF A CPO.

DET. SGT. DANIEL HUFF WAS PRESENT AT THE CPO HEARING AND, FOLLOWING THE CPO HEARING, HELD AN EX PARTE DISCUSSION WITH JUDGE MARY KOVACK AND EXPLAINED TO THE JUDGE THAT, BASED UPON HIS INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION, SCUMBAG BERNLOHR'S ARGUMENTS WERE WITHOUT MERIT AND, IN FACT, WERE UNTRUE.

GIVEN THE KNOWN INVOLVEMENT OF HER EX-HUSBAND MIKE "THE PERV" KOVACK  IN THIS CASE, JUDGE MARY KOVACK HAD A VERY REAL AND PROXIMATE CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN HEARING THE CASE.

AN HONEST JUDGE, THE LIKES OF WHICH YOU WILL NOT FIND IN MEDINA COUNTY, WOULD HAVE STEPPED AWAY AND RECUSED.  NOT MARY KOVACK!  SHE HAD A VESTED INTEREST IN PROTECTING HER EX-HUSBAND.  IF HE WERE TO BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE, HE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO PAY THE ORDERED CHILD SUPPORT!

JUDGE MARY CHOSE HER PERSONAL SELF-INTEREST OVER JUSTICE AND, AFTER LEARNING FROM SGT. HUFF THE TRUE FACTS HE LEARNED THROUGH HIS INVESTIGATION, NEVERTHELESS RULED AGAINST THE VICTIM OF  THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME.

OF COURSE, THE BLOGGER HAS ALREADY REVEALED THE EXTENT TO WHICH CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN HAS DONE EVERYTHING IN HIS POWER TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE FOR THE VICTIMS(S) OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME, PRIMARILY BECAUSE  HOE-MAN IS INVOLVED IN ALL OF THIS.

WHEN SGT. HUFF LEARNED OF JUDGE MARY'S DELIBERATELY CORRUPT JUDGMENT AGAINST THE VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME, BEING A PERSON OF HONESTY AND INTEGRITY (A RARE COMMODITY NOT OFTEN FOUND AMONG MEDINA COUNTY'S "PUBLIC SERVANTS"), HE WROTE ANOTHER OFFICIAL POLICE REPORT DOCUMENTING HIS DISCUSSION WITH JUDGE MARY AND HER UNJUST RULING. (THIS IS ONE OF THE TWO OF SGT. HUFF'S REPORTS THAT HOE-MAN SUPPRESSED IN THE JANUARY 29, 2016 BEFORE VISITING JUDGE PATRICIA COSGROVE WHO DOESN'T WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM).

GIVEN THE FACT THAT PUBLIC CORRUPTION IS RUNNING RAMPANT IN MEDINA COUNTY, SGT. HUFF TRANSMITTED HIS POLICE REPORTS TO BCI IN RICHFIELD, ALTHOUGH, TO BE SURE. THOSE SPECIAL AGENTS ARE NOT PARTICULARLY "SPECIAL" OR EQUIPPED TO INVESTIGATE MORE THAN THE MOST BASIC OF ALLEGED CRIMES.  

TAKE, FOR EXAMPLE, "SPECIAL" AGENT RICHARD WARNER, TASKED WITH "INVESTIGATING" THE TRANSCRIPT TAMPERING BY "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER AND FINDING NOTHING (COMPARE WITH AFFIDAVITS FROM VICTIMS OF TRANSCRIPT TAMPERING DEVELOPED BY THE BLOGGER AS SHOWN IN MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH PREJUDICE, ON THE GROUNDS OF JUDICIAL AND PROSECUTORIAL BAD FAITH).  WARNER HAS PROVED TO BE SO INEPT AND INCOMPETENT, HE HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO TASTE-TEST OLD RAPE KITS ON HAND AT CUYAHOGA COUNTY.

STEP IN HINCKLEY POLICE "CHIEF BOBBLEHEAD" KALAVSKY WHO, AT THE DIRECTION OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN, RECALLED SGT. HUFF'S REPORTS FROM BCI.  FURTHER, AGAIN AT THE DIRECTION OF "GODFATHER" HOE-MAN, "CHIEF  BOBBLEHEAD" UNLAWFULLY DISCIPLINED SGT. HUFF FOR REVEALING THE PUBLIC CORRUPTION TO BCI!

AS THE BLOGGER HAS ALREADY SHOWN, THE VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME HAS BEEN SUBJECTED TO THE MEDINA COUNTY JUDICIAL CIRCLE JERK!  THE QUESTION ARISES AS TO WHAT A VICTIM OF THESE CORRUPT JUDGES AND PROSECUTOR TO DO?

HERE'S THE ANSWER!  SUE EVERY ONE OF THESE LOW-LIFE "PUBLIC OFFICIALS" IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 42 USC 1983!

HERE'S A LOOK AT THE FEDERAL STATUTE:

42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)

• US Code
• Notes

prev | next

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

(R.S. § 1979; Pub. L. 96–170, § 1, Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284; Pub. L. 104–317, title III, § 309(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3853.)

NOW THERE'S A SOLUTION FOR YOU, HOLDING ALL OF THESE SCUMBAGS CIVILLY LIABLE FOR VIOLATING THE LAWFUL AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS OF  THE VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME.

MEDINA COUNTY HOMEOWNERS HIT THE JACKPOT !!! . . . THE MASSIVE MEDINA FRAUD SCHEME TAKES AN UNEXPECTED TURN !!!

IF YOU OWN A HOME WITH A WATER WELL IN MEDINA COUNTY,  YOU MAY HAVE HIT THE JACKPOT, COURTESY OF MEDINA COUNTY CORRUPT PUBLIC OFFICIALS.  YOU MAY HAVE A LEGAL CLAIM FOR MONEY DAMAGES AGAINST MEDINA COUNTY!

THE INFORMATION POSTED BELOW COMES FROM A VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME, WHICH THE BLOGGER BELIEVES TO BE BOTH ACCURATE AND TRUTHFUL.

THE  MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME ORCHESTRATED BY DINO HOE-MAN (WITH EMPHASIS ON "HOE") THE "GODFATHER" OF MEDINA ORGANIZED CRIME, THE MEDINA MOB, INVOLVES NOT ONLY "GODFATHER" HOE-MAN AND ILLEGITIMATE (BASTARD) "jUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER, COUNTY AUDITOR MIKE "THE PERV" KOVACK,  "WEASELPECKER'S" PARAMOUR, MISTRESS AND MAIN SQUEEZE DONNA GARRITY AND COURT REPORTER JENIFER LOONEY, BUT JUDGE MARY KOVACK, OFFICIALS OF THE MEDINA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, AND ASSORTED UNDERLINGS.

HERE IS HOW THE SCHEME AFFECTING MEDINA HOMEOWNERS PLAYS OUT, ACCORDING TO ONE OF THE VICTIMS OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME.

FIRSTLY, IF YOU HAVE A WATER WELL DRILLED ON YOUR PROPERTY IN OR AFTER 2007 BY DEPEW DRILLING AND/OR MEDINA PUMP AND DRILLING, YOU ARE LIKELY IN THE MONEY.

BEGINNING IN 2007 AND UP TO THE PRESENT DATE, THE MEDINA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT IS SAID TO HAVE ISSUED HUNDREDS OF PERMITS TO THE ABOVE-NAMED BUSINESSES WHICH ARE NOT, AND WERE NOT, OPERATED AS LEGALLY FORMED BUSINESS ENTITIES IN THE STATE OF OHIO.  MOREOVER, IT IS SAID THE OFFICIALS OF THE MEDINA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT HAVE ISSUED THOSE PERMITS WITH THE FULL KNOWLEDGE 1) THAT THE ABOVE-NAMED "BUSINESSES" WERE NOT PROPERLY, LEGITIMATELY BONDED AS REQUIRED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OHIO: AND 2) THAT THE "BONDS" WERE FALSELY PRESENTED WERE FRAUDULENTLY ISSUED BY A SCUMBAG IN INDIANA WHO IS MARRIED, PREDICTABLY, TO ANOTHER DIRTBALL "ATTORNEY."  WHAT A SHOCKER!

SO, IF YOU, A MEDINA COUNTY HOMEOWNER, HAVE SUCH A WATER WELL, YOU  MAY HAVE A MERITORIOUS CLAIM FOR MONEY DAMAGES AGAINST MEDINA COUNTY.

JUST A WORD OF CAUTION.  SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO FILE A LAWSUIT, YOU WOULD BE. WELL ADVISED TO SECURE THE SERVICES OF AN ATTORNEY OUTSIDE OF MEDINA COUNTY.  YOU CAN'T RELY ON THE JAGOFF ATTORNEYS FROM THE MEDINA COUNTY BAR & PICKPOCKET ASSN. TO REPRESENT YOUR BEST INTERESTS.  MOREOVER, YOU WANT TO DISQUALIFY BOTH OF THE LOCAL  JUDGES, WHO HAVE MADE A PACT WITH THE DEVIL, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN.

NOW, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN IS INVOLVED ON ALL OF THIS AND HAS VIOLATED THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OHIO IN HIS ILL-CONCEIVED EFFORTS TO COVER UP AND CONCEAL THIS DELIBERATE UNLAWFUL CONDUCT FROM PUBLIC VIEW.

SETTING ASIDE THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED UNLAWFUL CONDUCT, DINO HOE-MAN AND OTHER CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PUBLIC OFFICIALS HAVE FACILITATED AN INSURANCE FRAUD SCHEME, VICTIMIZING THE WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY ARISING FROM CERTAIN WATER WELLS DRILLED BY THE ABOVE-NAMED FIRMS.

LET'S LOOK AT OHIO LAW OF THE STATE OF OHIO, OUTSIDE OF THE MEDINA COUNTY CALIPHATE, THAT IS.

102.03 OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

(1) No present or former public official or employee shall, during public employment or service or for twelve months thereafter, represent a client or act in a representative capacity for any person on any matter in which the public official or employee personally participated as a public official or employee through decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, the rendering of advice, investigation, or other substantial exercise of administrative discretion.

IN A FUTURE POST AT THIS BLOG, THE BLOGGER WILL HAVE MUCH MORE TO SAY ABOUT THIS PIECE OF "ETHICS" LEGISLATION MOST RECENTLY VIOLATED BY CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN AND HIS ASS PROSECUTOR HEINRICH "BRAIN" RICHTER !

IILEGITIMATE MEDINA "jUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER REPORTS PERSONAL ALIEN ABDUCTION EXPERIENCE TO TUSCARAWAS COUNTY AUTHORITIES

THE BLOGGER HAS RECENTLY COME UPON THIS ARTICLE FROM A TUSCARAWAS NEWSPAPER  REPORTING AN ALLEGED ALIEN ABDUCTION ENCOUNTER TO THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE BY AN UNNAMED "MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE." IT DOES NOT TAKE A ROCKET SCIENTIST TO FIGURE THIS OUT!

The Tuscarawas County Sheriff’s Office in eastern Ohio received a call in the early morning hours of Tuesday, June 4 from a Medina County Judge claiming he encountered extraterrestrials.

Deputy Rick Morrison told the Times Reporter that the judge contacted the sheriff’s office at 1:36 a.m. saying that he had experienced car trouble shortly after “subjects not of this world” ordered him to drive to an abandon field.

Upon arriving at the destination, the judge said, the aliens informed the judge the field would reveal itself to be an airport where extraterrestrials would pick him up.

According to Deputy Rick Morrison from the Tuscarawas County Sheriff’s Office, the judge told him that he had been the victim of extraterrestrial abduction in the past, including at the home of Donna Garrity, usually in the early morning hours

The judge told police that he had been walking for hours before calling them. Deputy Morrison told Times Reporter that “it was obvious that the judge had walked for a long distance, as he had blisters on his feet — even though he was wearing crocs.” Police suspect the judge walked south on Route 800 from Stark County into Tuscarawas County where he made the call.

Police were unable to locate the judge’s car, but they suspect it is somewhere in Stark County or in the driveway at Donna Garrity’s home. The Tuscarawas County Sheriff’s Office did not release the judge’s name to protect his privacy, fearing he would be subject to justifiable public scorn and ridicule. Although deputies were unable to confirm the judge’s reports he had contact with aliens, they returned his ALUMINUM FOIL HAT to the judge when he left the Sheriff’s Office.  

APPEAL IV - APPEALING JUDGE COSGROVE'S DENIAL OF CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA "JUSTUS" SYSTEM

AS REGULAR READERS OF THIS BLOG ARE BY NOW AWARE, MATTHEW HARTMAN IS THE INNOCENT MAN WHOSE CASE HAS BEEN PROFILED AT THIS BLOG.  THE BLOGGER, WHO IS MATTHEW'S FATHER, IS AN HONORABLY AND HIGHLY DECORATED RETIRED FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WITH MORE THAN 30 YEARS LAW ENFORCEMENT EXPERIENCE AND IS UNIQUELY QUALIFIED TO ASSESS AND COMMENT UPON THE PUBLIC CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM, WHERE THE REAL CROOKS ARE RUNNING THE SHOW.

REGULAR READERS OF THIS BLOG ARE AWARE THAT MATTHEW'S ATTORNEY FILED A MOTION TO DISMISS THIS TYPICAL HOE-MAN BULLSHIT CASE ON THE GROUNDS OF AN ONGOING PATTERN OF EGREGIOUS MISCONDUCT, DRIVEN BY BAD FAITH, ON THE PART OF DINO HOE-MAN (WITH EMPHASIS ON "HOE"), THE GODFATHER OF MEDINA ORGANIZED CRIME,  ILLEGITIMATE "jUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER, HOE-MAN'S LAPDOG, AND VISITING JUDGE RICHARD "WEASEL DICK" MARKUS, CHIEF AMONG MORONS.

TO REVIEW A SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE CONDEMNING THESE CROOKS OVER AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE, MOSQUE, BROTHEL, & RAILROAD STATION, READERS CAN CLICK ON THE "PAGES" LINK AT THE UPPER RIGHT HAND CORNER OF THIS PAGE, CAPTIONED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE BASED ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT.

MATTHEW'S ATTORNEY FILED THE MOTION TO DISMISS, REFERENCED ABOVE,  ON NOVEMBER 10, 2014.

ON OCTOBER 23, 2015 AT 2:00 PM, AFTER NEARLY ONE FULL YEAR AND ON THE DAY BEFORE THE THIRD UNCONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL WAS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN, VISITING JUDGE COSGROVE DENIED THE MOTION TO DISMISS, EFFECTIVELY DENYING THE PROOF OF CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM."

IN HER OCTOBER 23, 2015 (THE DAY BEFORE THE SCHEDULED START OF THE THIRD UNCONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL), ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S PRETRIAL MOTIONS, JUDGE COSGROVE EXPRESSLY "FOUND"

"THE COURT FINDS NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE  TO SUPPORT DEFENDANT'S CLAIM THAT THE TWO TRIAL JUDGES AND THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE 'DELIBERATELY AND WILLFULLY ENGAGED IN EGREGIOUS MISCONDUCT DRIVEN BY BAD FAITH."

WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU ABOUT THE INTEGRITY AND CHARACTER OF JUDGE COSGROVE?

PERHAPS THE JUDGE WAS MUNCHING ON PEYOTE BUTTONS DURING THE FIVE MINUTES SHE TOOK TO REVIEW THE MOTION TO DISMISS.

NEVERTHELESS, MATTHEW FILED AN APPEAL, FOR THE FOURTH TIME, WITH THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, APPEALING JUDGE COSGROVE'S MISGUIDED AND MISPLACED DENIAL OF HIS MOTIONS TO DISMISS.

A COPY OF THE MOST RECENT APPEAL BRIEF, NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS NO. 15CA0090-M CAN BE ACCESSED AT "PAGES" IN THE UPPER RIGHT HAND CORNER OF THIS WEB PAGE.

PERHAPS IT MERITS A BRIEF REVIEW OF THE ISSUES TO WHICH JUDGE COSGROVE TURNED A DELIBERATE BLIND EYE IN AN ATTEMPT TO DENY THE CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM, AS SET OUT IN THE APPEALS BRIEF, CASE NO. 15CA0090-M:

The present trial court [COSGROVE], in denying Mr. Hartman's Motion to Dismiss, failed to recognize the clear and convincing evidence of misconduct and bad faith by the prosecuting attorneys and prior trial judges, which Mr. Hartman had briefed in detail, including proof of the following:

1. a)  The State prosecuted Matthew Hartman when, as the State well knew, Sheriff's deputies, lacking probable cause, unlawfully arrested Matthew Hartman based solely on the strength of an uncorroborated miscommunication from the sheriff's dispatcher to deputies. See Defendant's Reply to State's Opposition to Disqualify the Trial Testimony of Kimberly Leighton, at pp, 10- 13. 
   
   
2. b)  The State engaged in Brady violations. See Motion to Dismiss, at pp. 46, 49; Reply Brief, at pp. 49-53. The Honorable Judge Robert Brown, sitting briefly by assignment, had scheduled a hearing on the Brady violations, whereupon the Medina County Prosecutor applied to disqualify him. Judge Markus conducted Trial II. 
   
   
3. c)  The State fabricated a discovery document. See Motion to Dismiss, at p.1, Exhibit One; Reply Brief, at pp. 37- 42, Exhibit Ten. 
   
   
4. d)  The State invaded the defense camp at Matthew Hartman's first trial. See Motion to Dismiss, at pp. 1-2, Exhibit Two; Reply Brief, at pp. 42-49, Exhibits Eleven and Twelve. 
   
   
5. e)  Trial court I [COLLIER], applying the erroneous “reasonable articulable suspicion” standard rather than “probable cause” to control the admission of evidence at trial, denied Mr. Hartman's motion to suppress on the absurd rationale that a grand jury indictment cures violations of the Fourth Amendment by law enforcement officers. See Motion to Dismiss, at pp. 2-5, Exhibits Fifty-Five, Fifty-Six, Fifty-Seven; Reply Brief, at pp. 23-25, Exhibit Seven. 
   
   
6. f)  The assistant prosecutor introduced forbidden alleged and untrue “other acts evidence” at Mr. Hartman's first trial, with the approval of Trial Judge I [COLLIER], after assuring defense counsel and the judge during discussions in limine that he would not do so. See Motion to Dismiss, at pp. 5-6, Exhibit Three.

7. g)  Trial Court II [MARKUS] concealed and withheld from the defense a prejudicial ex parte letter, mailed to the trial court by adversaries of Matthew Hartman's father in unrelated federal civil litigation and making false and unfounded accusations, prejudicing the trial judge against Matthew Hartman and his defense team and influencing the evidentiary rulings.. See Motion to Dismiss, at pp. 6-7, Exhibit Four; Reply Brief, at p. 66, n. 10. 
   
   
8. h)  During an ex parte conversation in chambers between the Trial Court I judge [COLIER] and the assistant prosecutor, defense counsel and her investigator overheard the judge [COLLIER] yell at the assistant prosecutor for compelling testimony from Matthew Hartman's wife at trial, then adding to the prosecutor, “But I'll help you.” See Motion to Dismiss, at pp. 9-10, Exhibit Five. 
   
   
9. i)  Donna Garrity, principal in the firm Medina Court Reporter's Inc. and the official court reporter under contract with Trial Judge I, [COLLIER] filed deliberately, materially altered transcripts in the Ninth District Court of Appeals of Matthew Hartman's first trial and suppression hearing, after requesting and receiving no fewer than 7 extensions of time from the Court; and demonstrating that the current trial court [COSGROVE] overlooked obvious alterations, including incongruous objections inserted into the record to conceal deletions of testimony, obvious gaps in testimony, and altered passages of testimony where original testimony was documented in contemporaneous notes, briefs and later memorialized by impeachment during trial. See Motion to Dismiss, at pp, 10-26, Exhibits Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, Eleven, Twelve, Thirteen, Fourteen, Fifteen, Sixteen, Seventeen, Eighteen, Nineteen, and Twenty; Reply Brief, at pp. 63-65. 
   
   
10. j)  Court Reporter Jenifer Lunney, also employed by the suspect Medina Court Reporters, Inc., prepared and furnished to the defense a materially altered transcript of Matthew Hartman's October 28, 2013 bond hearing, materially altered with the intent to deprive Matthew's wife of her inviolable spousal privilege for yet a third time in the proceedings below. See Motion to Dismiss, at pp. 26-28, Exhibits Fifty-Eight. Fifty-Nine, and Sixty; Defendant's Reply to State's Opposition to Protective Order, at pp. 5-7. 
    
    
11. k)  Donna Garrity, the official court reporter for the judge in Matthew Hartman's first trial, has been materially altering official transcripts of proceedings before the same judge  [COLLIER] for no less than 13 years, as early as 2003, including, but not limited to, transcripts in the cases of Jeffery Mack, Frank P. Wood, David L. Reed, Ashley Marrs, Lynn Vandeusen, Richard Miles, and Gregg Depew. See Motion to Dismiss, at pp. 28-37, Exhibits Twenty-One, Twenty- Two, Twenty-Three, Twenty-Four, and Twenty-Five; Reply Brief, at pp. 86- 89, Exhibit Twenty-Two. See also Defendant's Reply to State's Opposition to Motion for Protective Order, Exhibits Three and Four. 
    
    
12. l)  Transcripts prepared by Garrity’s firm, for other Medina County courtrooms, before other judges, have been similarly materially altered. See Motion to Dismiss, at pp. 37-40, Exhibits Twenty-Six, Twenty-Seven, Twenty-Eight, Twenty-Nine, Thirty, and Thirty-One.

13. m)  A purported investigation conducted by the Office of Mike DeWine, Ohio Attorney General, into the transcript tampering, was no more than a sham, intended by DeWine to conceal and cover up the misconduct of the Medina County sitting judge, one of DeWine's Republican cronies. See Reply Brief, at pp. 70-80; Exhibits Eighteen, Nineteen, and Twenty. (E.g., DeWine’s “investigators” refused to subpoena Garrity’s raw tapes of hearings, and other relevant and probative evidence, instead choosing to believe Garrity’s and Collier’s denials, without scrutiny. 
    
    
14. n)  The judge in Matthew Hartman's first trial [COLLIER] appears to have participated in a false billing scheme by court reporter Donna Garrity, who billed Medina County for stenographic services not supported by case dockets in cases before Judge Collier. See Motion to Dismiss, at pp. 57-62; Exhibits Forty-Six, Forty-Seven, Forty-Eight, Forty-Nine, Fifty, Fifty-One, Fifty-Two, Fifty- Three, and Fifty-Four; Reply Brief, at pp. 80-83. 
    
    
15. o)  Medina County Prosecutor Dean Holman has personally engaged in altering “official” transcripts of court proceedings. See Defendant's Reply to State's Opposition to Motion for Protective Order, at pp. 12-16; Exhibits Four and Five. 
    
    
16. p)  To the present date, the State persists in misrepresenting the facts and the record in this case. See Reply Brief, at pp. 1-5, 10-42, 45-49, 53-57, 63-67, 80-83; Defendant's Reply to State's Opposition to Motion for Protective Order, at pp. 1-5; Defendant's Reply to State's Opposition to Disqualify the Trial Testimony of Kimberly Leighton, at pp. 1-13; Defendant's Reply to State's Opposition to Motion to Suppress Unlawfully Seized Evidence, Fruit of the Poisonous Tree; Defendant's Reply to State's Opposition to Motion to Suppress the Audio Recording of the 911 Call, at pp.1-13; Defendant's Reply to State's Opposition to Motion to Enforce Defendant's Double Jeopardy Protections. 
    
    
17. q)  While Matthew Hartman was confined in the Medina County Jail, the State refused to provide him with timely and necessary medical treatment for a life- threatening illness contracted while he was unlawfully imprisoned an additional month following the reversal of his conviction, and, thereby, subjected him to cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the Eighth Amendment, almost causing his death and amputation of his leg. See Defendant’s Opposition to State’s Motion to Reconsider Order on Venue, at Pages 6 – 9, and Matthew Hartman’s Reply Brief, in support of Motion to Dismiss and contra State’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, at Page 93. 

ONCE AGAIN, AFTER REVIEWING THE EVIDENCE OF THE DELIBERATE BAD FAITH CONDUCT OF HOE-MAN, COLLIER, AND MARKUS, MADE THE DISINGENUOUS  "FINDING" THAT:

"THE COURT FINDS NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE  TO SUPPORT DEFENDANT'S CLAIM THAT THE TWO TRIAL JUDGES AND THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE 'DELIBERATELY AND WILLFULLY ENGAGED IN EGREGIOUS MISCONDUCT DRIVEN BY BAD FAITH."

THE ONLY PROPER INFERENCE TO BE DRAWN FROM JUDGE COSGROVE'S "FINDINGS" IS THAT SHE HAS BEEN INDUCTED INTO THE "GOOD OLE' BOYS" CLUB AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE, MOSQUE, BROTHEL & RAILROAD STATION!!!

THE GREAT MEDINA COUNTY JUDICIAL CIRCLE JERK!

NOT SURPRISINGLY, THE VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME IS A VICTIM OF ANOTHER FACET OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME ORCHESTRATED BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN, THE "GODFATHER" OF MEDINA ORGANIZED CRIME, THE MEDINA MOB.

THE MOVERS AND SHAKERS INVOLVED IN THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME, ORCHESTRATED BY "GODFATHER" HOE-MAN, HAVE IMPLEMENTED THE TACTIC OF BOUNCING THE VICTIM FROM COURT TO COURT IN MEDINA COUNTY.

THE JUDGES INVOLVED IN THIS JUDICIAL CIRCLE JERK: MARY KOVACK (DOMESTIC RELATIONS), "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER (KANGAROO COURTROOM #1), JOYCE NIMBLER (KANGAROO COURTROOM #2), PATRICIA COSGROVE (VISITING JUDGE) AND KEVIN DUMM (PROBATE).

THE VICTIM HAS HAD CASES (PLURAL) PENDING BEFORE ALL OF THESE JUDGES, WHO ARE BOTH STALLING RULINGS AND COVERING UP THE UNLAWFUL CONDUCT OF OTHER JUDGES INVOLVED IN THE JUDICIAL CIRCLE JERK AND CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN.

WHILE IT IS TRUE THAT VISITING "JUDGE" RICHARD "WEASEL DICK" MARKUS, CHIEF AMONG MORONS, IS NOT APPARENTLY INVOLVED IN THIS PARTICULAR JUDICIAL CIRCLE JERK, HE HAS BEEN INVOLVED IN OTHERS IN MEDINA COUNTY, YOU, THE READER, CAN BE SURE.

LET'S REVIEW HOW THESE LESS-THAN-HONORABLE "JUDGES" HAVE ATTEMPTED TO CONCEAL AND COVER UP THE NEFARIOUS ACTIVITIES OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DINO HOE-MAN AND MEMBERS OF HOE-MAN'S CRIME SYNDICATE, THE MEDINA MOB.

ILLEGITIMATE MEDINA COUNTY "jUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER

IN THE MATTER OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME, AS HAS ALREADY BEEN PROVED, "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER HAS ADOPTED AND ORDERED THE ENFORCEMENT OF AN UNSIGNED PURPORTED MEDIATION "AGREEMENT" AND AN UNSIGNED EX PARTE "STIPULATED" PERMANENT INJUNCTION AFTER "HEARING" TESTIMONY FROM A SLUG OF JAGOFF ATTORNEYS, MEMBERS OF HOE-MAN'S MEDINA MOB, ONE AND ALL.  "WEASELPECKER" NEVER HEARD FROM THE DEFRAUDED HEIRS OF THE ESTATE, ONLY HIS JAGOFF BUDDIES FROM THE MEDINA COUNTY BAR & PICKPOCKET ASSN.

THE SIMPLE, INCONTROVERTIBLE FACT IS THAT NONE OF THE DEFRAUDED HEIRS AGREED TO THE PURPORTED MEDIATION "AGREEMENT" OR THE PURPORTED "STIPULATED" PERMANENT INJUNCTION.  IN SHORT, THERE WAS NO MEETING OF THE MINDS AND, THEREFORE, NO AGREEMENT.

HOW MUCH MONEY DO YOU, THE READER, BELIEVE "WEASELPECKER" PROFITED FROM THESE UNLAWFUL RULINGS?

OF COURSE, AFTER ISSUING THESE DELIBERATELY UNLAWFUL RULINGS, "WEASLPECKER" RECUSED HIMSELF FROM THE CASE "TO AVOID THE APPEARANCE OF FURTHER IMPROPRIETY."  WHAT THAT MEANS IS "WEASELPECKER" GOT HIS "CUT" AND WENT ON HIS MERRY WAY TO CONCENTRATE  ON BOINKING HIS COURT REPORTER (WITH BENEFITS) DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY, "WEASELPECKER'S PARAMOUR, MISTRESS, AND MAIN SQUEEZE.

"WEASELPECKER" COLLIER HANDED THE CASE(S) PERTAINING TO THE MASSIVE FRAUD CASE  OFF TO NEWBY JUDGE JOYCE KIMBLER.

THE VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME FILED A NUMBER OF MOTIONS BEFORE JUDGE JOYCE.  IN OBVIOUS ALLEGIANCE TO CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN (WITH EMPHASIS ON "HOE'), REFUSED TO RULE, MUCH LESS GRANT ANY ONE OF THE FLURRY OF MOTIONS FILED BY THE VICTIM.

OF PARTICULAR INTEREST IS A MOTION TO COMPEL DONNA GARRITY TO PRODUCE A COMPLETE, UNREDACTED TRANSCRIPT  OF A HEARING HELD BEFORE 'WEASELPECKER" COLLIER, FROM WHICH CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN AND LOCAL JAGOFF ATTORNEY LARRY COURTNEY REMOVED AND DELETED  A TOTAL OF 76 PAGES.  IN SO DOING, HOE-MAN AND COURTNEY VIOLATED THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OHIO: TAMPERING WITH RECORDS, A FELONY OF THE THIRD DEGREE !

OF COURSE, JUDGE JOYCE WANTED NO PART OF THAT MOTION, THE GRANTING OF WHICH WOULD PROVE THAT HOE-MAN IS NOTHING MORE THAN A COMMON CRIMINAL WITH A LAW DEGREE, A LICENSE TO STEAL !

ON THE DAY FOLLOWING THE DISCLOSURE AT THIS BLOG THAT CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN MADE A CASH CONTRIBUTION TO HER CAMPAIGN AND SPONSORED A FUND-RAISER, JUDGE JOYCE RECUSED HERSELF, WITHOUT RULING ON ANY OF THE VICTIM'S MOTIONS, AND HANDED THE CASE OFF TO VISITING JUDGE PATRICIA COSGROVE.  Please see prior post at this blog, published on May 21, 2015, captioned "JUDGE JOYCE KIMBLER DANCES WITH THE DEVIL ! "

LET'S LOOK AT SOME OF THE MOTIONS FILED BY THE VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME NOW BEFORE JUDGE PATRICIA COSGROVE, WHO HAS STALLED AND FAILED TO RULE ON THE VICTIM'S MOTIONS:

10/21/2013  MOTION FOR HEARING
11/19/2013  MOTION TO INTRODUCE NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE
01/18/2014  MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MOTION TO DISMISS
04/24/2014  MOTION TO STRIKE
05/15/2014  MOTION TO ADMIT EVIDENCE
08/12/2014  MOTION TO COMPEL; MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE
08/15/2014  MOTION TO ADMIT EVIDENCE
11/03/2014  RULE 60(B) MOTION TO VACATE MEDIATION AGREEMENT
06/05/2015  MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
03/09/2016  MOTION TO DISMISS PER RULE 11

WOULD YOU, THE READER, CARE TO HAZARD A GUESS AS TO HOW MANY OF THESE MOTIONS, ABOVE, THAT JUDGE COSGROVE HAS DECIDED AND RULED WITHIN THE PAST 2 1/2 YEARS?  NOT ONE! ZIP! NADA!

TO BE FAIR TO JUDGE COSGROVE, SHE CONDUCTED A PURPORTED "HEARING" ON JANUARY 29, 2016 AT WHICH TIME CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN AND HIS LACKEY, ASS PROSECUTOR HEINRICH "BRAIN" RICHTER FILED A FALSE AND FRAUDULENT MOTION TO PREVENT THE INTRODUCTION OF OF EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY OF HINCKLEY POLICE SGT. DANIEL HUFF WHOSE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE WOULD HAVE IMPLICATED HOE-MAN IN THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME.

AS READERS MAY SUSPECT, HOWEVER, JUDGE COSGROVE HAS FAILED TO RULE ON THE ISSUES PRESENTED AT THE JANUARY 29 HEARING, NEARLY 3 MONTHS LATER !

A REALLY INTERESTING MOTION, FILED WITH JUDGE JOYCE AND JUDGE DUMM BOTH, WAS A MOTION TO COMPEL MEDINA COURT REPORTERS JENNIFER LOONEY (SPELLED L-U-N-N-E-Y) AND DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY TO PRODUCE THE FULL, COMPLETE AND UNREDACTED TRANSCRIPT OF THE HEARING FROM WHICH CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN HAS REMOVED AND DELETED 76 PAGES, IN VIOLATION OF THE STATE OF OHIO.

AS SHOWN IN THE PRIOR POST AT THIS BLOG, JUDGE  KEVIN DUMM HAS REFUSED TO GRANT THE MOTION AND HAS DISMISSED THE PROBATE CASE, UNDER QUESTIONABLE CIRCUMSTANCES, WHICH SOUGHT TO DISCOVER THE ASSETS OF THE ESTATE THAT HAD BEEN CONCEALED AND STOLEN BY HOE-MAN AND MEMBERS OF HIS MEDINA MOB.

WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU ABOUT JUDGE DUMM?

NOW JUDGE JOYCE, IN ANOTHER CASE RELATED TO THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME,   WANTED NO PART OF THE MOTION TO COMPEL LOONEY AND GARRITY TO TURN OVER THE COMPLETE TRANSCRIPT FROM WHICH CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN DELETED AND REMOVED 76 PAGES, A FELONY CRIME.  AFTER ALL, JUDGE JOYCE WOULDN'T WANT ANY EVIDENCE TO SURFACE THAT WOULD IMPLICATE HOE-MAN, HER BENEFACTOR, IN CRIMINAL CONDUCT.

JUDGE JOYCE HANDED THAT CASE OFF TO VISITING JUDGE PATRICIA COSGROVE, AS WELL.  PREDICTABLY JUDGE COSGROVE, WHO HAS ALREADY DENIED THE REALITY OF THE CORRUPTION ENDEMIC IN THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS' SYSTEM, DOESN'T WANT TO SEE ANY MORE EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE PUBLIC CORRUPTION IN MEDINA COUNTY.

JUDGE COSGROVE HAS NOT RULED ON THIS MOTION, AND SHE NEVER WILL SINCE SHE IS ALSO COMMITTED TO CONCEALING AND COVERING UP THE OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM.

THE BLOGGER, IN A PRIOR POST, HAS DEMONSTRATED HOW EASILY HOE-MAN CORRUPTS THESE RETIRED, VISITING JUDGES.  THE PROMISE OF FUTURE ASSIGNMENTS IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS IS ALL IT TAKES. IT'S EASY MONEY FOR A RETIRED JUDGE, WHO SIMPLY HAS TO RULE IN EVERY CASE IN HOE-MAN'S FAVOR.

LAST, BUT NOT LEAST, IS DOMESTIC RELATIONS JUDGE MARY KOVACK WHO HAS FACILITATED THE CRIME OF FEDERAL TAX EVASION BY ISSUING A CIVIL PROTECTION ORDER, BARRING THE VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME FROM REPORTING CRIMES, INCLUDING THE CRIMES OF HER FORMER HUSBAND COUNTY AUDITOR MIKE "THE PERV" KOVACK, TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES.  JUDGE MARY HAS HAD NO SMALL PART TO PLAY IN THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME.

IT IS A STUPENDOUS REALIZATION THAT ALL OF THESE "JUDGES" COME SO CHEAPLY.  ON SECOND THOUGHT, IT SHOULD COME AS NO SURPRISE SINCE THEY ARE ALL "ATTORNEYS!"