LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER PROVES HIMSELF TO BE A COMPLETE WHORE, ON THE TRIAL RECORD!

In one of his typically ignorant and untruthful colloquies with LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, demonstrated his complete and total dishonesty and profound ignorance of the law by disingenuously stating:

"My position is – and I think there are cases that back this up – that a criminal trespass – the criminal trespass would not be appropriate. … The State’s position is, the criminal trespass could not be an appropriate lesser included offense on an aggravated burglary...."

Then, in an attempt to denigrate the Defense Counsel, who is an honest and ethical attorney, the likes of which cannot be found in the employ of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, added:

"[Defense Counsel] misstates the law constantly....  Criminal Trespass (as argued by Defense Counsel) is not an element of Aggravated Burglary."

However, contrary to SALISBURY'S DISINGENUOUS CLAIMS and contrary to LAPDOG COLLIER'S CORRUPT RULING, the 9th District Court of Appeals decided otherwise in deciding State v. Morris.

There is absolutely no doubt about the fact that, on the trial record, LAPDOG JUDGE AND VILLAGE IDIOT CHRISTOPHER COLLIER HAS PROVEN HIMSELF TO INDISPUTABLY A COMPLETE AND TOTAL WHORE!

At the conclusion of any trial, the trial judge is required to instruct the jury as to the law and the charges they may consider during their deliberations as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant,

In the case being profiled here at the blog, Defense Counsel requested Collier to give the jury an instruction or charge, on the lesser-included offense of CRIMINAL TRESPASS.

Of course, when SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, objected to the jury instruction, LAPDOG COLLIER responded to the signal from SALISBURY (which was not really an objection, but rather an order) by refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of CRIMINAL TRESPASS.

However, the CRIMINAL TRESPASS instruction was not only warranted, but legally mandated under the circumstances presented in this case.

In calendar year 2008, the 9th District Court of Appeals decided the case of State v. Morris, overturning a burglary conviction because the trial judge failed to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of CRIMINAL TRESPASS.

In State v. Morris, the 9th District Court of Appeals held:

{¶5} As we stated in State v. Divincenzo, 9th Dist. No. 05CA0105-M, 2006-Ohio-6330:
"Criminal trespass is a lesser included offense of aggravated burglary.

The 9th District Court of Appeals went on to hold:

{¶6} "If under any reasonable view of the evidence it is possible for the trier of fact to find the defendant not guilty of the greater offense and guilty of the lesser offense, the instruction on the lesser included offense must be given. The evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to defendant." (Emphasis added.) State v. Deimling (Dec. 20, 2000), 9th Dist. No. 99CA007496, at *1 quoting State v. Wilkins (1980), 64 Ohio St.2d 382, 388 (Emphasis added).

Finally, the 9th District Court ruled:

{¶14} Based on the foregoing, we hold that under the specific facts of this case, the trial court abused its discretion in failing to give the jury the criminal trespass instruction. Defendant's first assignment of error is sustained and the judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded to the trial court for a new trial.

Perhaps the reader may suspect that this ruling innocently passed by LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, unnoticed.  NOT SO!!


The trial judge who "abused his discretion" (as if he exercised the slightest scintilla of discretion at all) in the matter of State v. Morris was none other than LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT!


So then, LAPDOG COLLIER WAS OVERTURNED BUT ONE YEAR PRIOR TO THE INSTANT CASE ON THE VERY SAME ISSUE.


JUST ONE MORE AREA OF FERTILE GROUND FOR INVESTIGATORS FROM THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE OHIO SUPREME COURT TO EXPLORE!


THIS IS PROOF, BEYOND ALL DOUBT, THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, WILL DO ANYTHING AT ALL, INCLUDING RAILROADING AN INNOCENT MAN TO PRISON, TO PLEASE HIS MASTERS AT THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE IN ORDER TO PRESERVE HIS LIFETIME UNCONTESTED APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH, ALL COMPLIMENTS OF CORRUPT DEMOCRAT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.

IN THE BLOGGER'S VIEW, THIS LITTLE BIT OF NOT-SO-LEGAL WIZARDRY BY LAPDOG COLLIER, A COMPLETELY WORTHLESS AND TOTALLY CORRUPT "LAWYER," QUALIFIES HIM FOR THE TITLE OF THE BIGGEST WHORE IN MEDINA COUNTY!

You can read the entire appellate decision of the 9th District Court of Appeals at the website of the MEDINA COUNTY CLERK OF COURT WEBSITE at this link: http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=07CA0044-M&p=2&a=13

And who, do you suppose, prosecuted this case for Dino Holman's Office?  You guessed it.  None other than the OLD PATHOLOGICAL LIAR HIMSELF, SCOTT SALISBURY a/k/a SKIPPY SLEAZEBURY (for now all-too-obvious reasons).

THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN, AND SALISBURY ALL BELONG IN FEDERAL PRISON.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, LIES ON THE TRIAL RECORD!

LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND COUNTY WHORE, is obviously not the brightest bulb in the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station.

In fact, it can be said that LAPDOG COLLIER IS DOWNRIGHT STUPID IN TRYING TO PRESERVE HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH COMPLIMENTS OF CORRUPT DEMOCRAT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEMOCRAT PARTY, BRINGING TO MIND THE SHADES OF CORRUPTION IN CUYAHOGA COUNTY.

TAKE FOR EXAMPLE, LAPDOG COLLIER'S GRATUITOUS TESTIMONY AT TRIAL, IN VIOLATION OF OHIO RULE OF EVIDENCE 605.

Specifically, Rule 605 of the Ohio Rules of Evidence provides:

RULE 605.  Competency of judge as a witness.

The judge presiding at the trial may not testify in that trial as a witness.  No objection need be made to preserve the point.

NOW CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING EXCHANGE BETWEEN LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, AND DEFENSE COUNSEL, FOUND AT PAGES 616 AND 617 OF THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT, CONCERNING THE MATTER OF THE KEYSTONE SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES WHO WERE VISIBLE TO THE DEFENDANT AND FRED FLINTSTONE AS THEY TALKED IN THE DRIVEWAY OF THE FLINTSTONE RESIDENCE:

DEFENSE COUNSEL:  -- [I]t’s to show that they could see the officer there, and the Defendant was not running away because he could see the officers. Anybody in this driveway positioned where the photograph was taken, could see that property where the police cars were. They saw them.

COLLIER:  Who saw them? Who?

DEFENSE COUNSEL:  The Defendant and Fred.

THE COURT: Fred said he didn’t see the police officers.

DEFENSE COUNSEL:  This one’s on the south side because –

COLLIER:  He said he didn’t see any police officers.The Defendant said he saw no –

DEFENSE COUNSEL:  Well, then, your Honor –

COLLIER:  No, no, no. The Defendant didn’t say he didn’t see any police officers. Fred said he saw no police officers.

Setting aside for the moment the improper testimony of LAPDOG COLLIER given at trial, LAPDOG COLLIER ACTUALLY LIED ON THE RECORD ABOUT THE PRIOR TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES.

Firstly, the Defendant offered NO TESTIMONY AT TRIAL and therefore did not testify that he saw, or did not see, the Keystone Sheriff's deputies, which in fact he did.

Secondly, Fred Flintstone offered absolutely no testimony about having seen, or not seen, the Keystone deputies positioned around his premises as he and the Defendant stood talking peacefully in Fred's driveway.  Actually, Fred confirmed to this blogger that he also saw the Keystone deputies positioned around his home as he talked for a protracted period of time with the Defendant in his own driveway.

SO, IN HIS RUSH TO RAILROAD AND CONVICT AN INNOCENT CITIZEN, LAPDOG COLLIER ACTUALLY LIED ON THE RECORD.  NOT TOO BRIGHT, BUT THAT IS SIMPLY THE RESULT OF YEARS OF EXERCISING UNCHALLENGED AND UNBRIDLED AUTHORITY, ALL IN LAPDOG COLLIER'S OWN SELF-INTEREST, AT THE BEHEST OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE DEMOCRAT PARTY.

IT IS NOT VERY DIFFICULT TO BELIEVE THAT THE ORGANIZED CRIME THAT INFILTRATED CUYAHOGA COUNTY POLITICS HAS REACHED ITS TENTACLES INTO MEDINA COUNTY CONSIDERING THE INTEGRITY, OR MORE APPROPRIATELY THE LACK THEREOF, IN THE LIKES OF LAPDOG COLLIER AND DINO HOLMAN, COLLIER'S PUPPET MASTER.

THIS IS JUST ONE MORE REASON WHY MEDINA COUNTY NEEDS AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNTIED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, PERSONALLY ENDORSES "THE LITTLE BLUE PILL"

WHAT A HOOT!  PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, MEDINA ASS. PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY a/k/a SLEAZEBURY (for obvious reasons) HAS PERSONALLY ENDORSED THE "LITTLE BLUE PILL" IN AN EMAIL TO THIS BLOG.


Firstly, on June 24, 2011,  SALISBURY, THE CLEARLY PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, sent this email message to the blog:

Scott Sleazebury to me

show details Jun 24 (1 day ago)

Scott Sleazebury has sent you a link to a blog:

I give up now, you win. I will quit doing this. 

Now, the blogger found SALISBURY'S representation to lack credibility since, after all, SALISBURY IS A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.

Secondly, NOT ONLY IS SALISBURY A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, HE LACKS ANY MEASURE OF SELF-CONTROL.  The blogger was certain that SALISBURY just couldn't restrain himself and just HAD TO KEEP SENDING HIS GOOFY MESSAGES TO THE BLOG.

The blogger must admit that SALISBURY'S various messages to the blog are always good for a hardy laugh, of course always at SALISBURY'S expense.

Sure enough! As the blogger anticipated, SALISBURY just couldn't hold back.

On Saturday evening/Sunday evening, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, had apparently imbibed one too many Shirley Temples and was obviously in his cups.

At 2:42 am on Sunday morning, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR was once again unable to control himself and fired off HIS RINGING ENDORSEMENT OF THAT "LITTLE BLUE PILL" in another email message to this blog:

Scott Sleazebury to me

show details 2:42 AM (12 hours ago)

Scott Sleazebury has sent you a link to a blog:

GET SOME VIAGARA OLD MAN, WHY NOT ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING! 

The blogger finds it more than amusing that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, chose this forum to endorse HIS DRUG OF CHOICE!  IT OBVIOUSLY WORKS FOR HIM!


UNTIL SALISBURY SENT ALONG HIS ENDORSEMENT, THE BLOGGER HAD NO IDEA THAT "THE LITTLE BLUE PILL" WAS USED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, BASES HIS RULINGS ON THE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY: THE SUPREME COURT OF COMEDY!

This blogger has come to the very reasonable conclusion that LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, has based all of his irrational rulings (and there are many)  upon the holdings of the TV show THE SUPREME COURT OF COMEDY!

LAPDOG'S RULINGS CERTAINLY DO NOT COMPORT WITH THE RULINGS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.

For his basic legal research, THE VILLAGE IDIOT obviously relies on re-runs of JUDGE JUDY!

However, for more complex issues, it is painfully clear that THE VILLAGE IDIOT consults THE SUPREME COURT OF COMEDY!  You can acces LAPDOG COLLIER'S primary research tool at  http://www.laughfactory.com/cat-51-Supreme%20Court%20of%20Comedy.

Unfortunately, LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, AND CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND HIS VERY CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS ARE THE ONLY ONES LAUGHING.

IT IS PAINFULLY OBVIOUS WHY HOLMAN AND HIS DEMOCRATS WON'T RUN A CANDIDATE IN OPPOSITION TO LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, IN ANY OF THOSE INFAMOUS RIGGED MEDINA COUNTY ELECTIONS.  THERE IS CLEARLY NO GREATER IMBECILE WITH A LAW DEGREE TO BE FOUND IN ALL OF MEDINA COUNTY THAN LAPDOG COLLIER!


MUCH MORETO COME ....

THE VILLAGE IDIOT, LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER,CAN'T READ THE GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPT!

In the earlier segment of this blog, readers learned the SHOCKING TRUTH: LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, SIMPLY DID NOT KNOW ONE OF THE MOST SIMPLE AND FUNDAMENTAL PRECEPTS OF THE LAW: THAT GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS MUST BE RECORDED!

Having ultimately learned that the proceedings of the Medina County grand jury are,indeed, recorded IN CONFORMITY WITH THE LAW, THE VILLAGE IDIOT NEVERTHELESS REFUSED TO READ THE GRAND JURY TESTIMONY OF DEPUTY CLINAGE TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNTIED STATES CONSTITUTION HAD BEEN VIOLATED!

The decision of LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, begs the question: Can the Village Idiot really read at all?

It may be that Medina Ass. prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, writes NO LEGAL BRIEFS simply because LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, is simply unable to read a brief with any comprehension.

That simple deduction is a true blessing for SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, WHO REALLY DOESN'T KNOW THE LAW AND CERTAINLY CAN'T SPELL ANY WORD CONTAINING MORE THAN FOUR LETTERS AND ONE VOWEL.

NEVERTHELESS, IT IS ABUNDANTLY CLEAR THAT COLLIER INTENTIONALLY DEPRIVED THE DEFENDANT OF HIS SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS BY FAILING TO HAVE AN EDUCATED INDIVIDUAL READ THE TRANSCRIPT TO HIM.

THEN AGAIN, IT IS CERTAINLY WITHIN THE REALM OF POSSIBILITY/PROBABILITY THAT LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, SIMPLY OBEYED A DIRECT ORDER FROM SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, TO REFUSE A REVIEW OF THE TRANSCRIPT, WHICH WOULD MOST CERTAINLY REVEAL THAT CLINAGE FAILED TO OFFER ANY TESTIMONY IN SUPPORT OF AN ALLEGED UNSPECIFIED "UNDERLYING CRIME."

Such is the essence of the lack of "justice" in Medina County, where LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, SPELLS THE TERM "JUST US!"

JUST ONE MORE REASON THAT MEDINA COUNTY NEEDS AN INDEPENDENT CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF THE COURTS BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE!

MUCH MORE TO COME .... 

IGNORNACE IS BLISS! NO WONDER LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER WEARS A MILE-WIDE GRIN!

It is often said that IGNORANCE IS BLISS!  That most assuredly explains why LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER wears a mile-wide grin and resembles a possum.

LAPDOG COLLIER is not troubled by that which he doesn't know, and there's a whole lot that LAPDOG COLLIER really doesn't know.

THE ONE THING THAT LAPDOG COLLIER DOES KNOW IS THAT, AS LONG AS HE OBEYS CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND DOES EXACTLY AS HE'S TOLD, HE WILL RETAIN HIS LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT AND WILL NEVER HAVE TO FACE AN OPPONENT FROM THE DEMOCRATS, HOLMAN'S PARTY, IN ONE OF THOSE INFAMOUS MEDINA COUNTY RIGGED ELECTIONS!

Following is but one of many matters about which LAPDOG COLLIER HAS DEMONSTRATED THAT HE IS A COMPLETELY IGNORANT, INCOMPETENT BOOB:

A review of the trial record being profiled at this blog discloses that the Defense Counsel moved LAPDOG COLLIER to review the transcript of the grand jury testimony of Deputy Douglas Clinage to determine what testimony, if any, that Clinage may have given to support the underlying, unspecified alleged criminal offense that the Defendant had intended to commit.

Now, LAPDOG COLLIER, in a typical display of his total ignorance, declared that he believed that the Medina County grand jury did not record its proceedings!

HEARING THAT DECLARATION FROM THE MOUTH OF A PURPORTED JUDGE WAS REALLY A SHOCKER !!!!!  HOW COULD ANYONE, MUCH LESS A PURPORTED "JUDGE," BE SO ASTOUNDINGLY IGNORANT AND MISINFORMED???

ACCORDING TO THE OHIO SUPREME COURT AND THE RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS MUST BE RECORDED!

State v. Grewell (1989), 45 Ohio St. 3d 4 -- Syllabus: "Crim. R. 22 applies to grand jury proceedings. Pursuant to Crim. R. 22 grand jury proceedings in felony cases must be recorded."

The decision of the Ohio Supreme Court in the matter of State v Grewell can be found at
http://oh.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.19890816_0040909.OH.htm/qx

The Ohio Supreme Court only recently handed down this decision a scant 22 years ago!

Further, Rule 22 of the Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure provides:

"IN SERIOUS OFFENSE CASES, ALL PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE RECORDED!"

One might just come to the conclusion that CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN SIMPLY FAILED TO INFORM LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER OF THIS MANDATE OF THE LAW!

What is really surprising is that LAPDOG COLLIER  was a "defense attorney" prior to being handed his lifetime, uncontested appointment to the Medina County Bench.

All of LAPDOG COLLIER'S former clients may wish to appeal their convictions on the basis of INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, A SUREFIRE WINNER!

SOMEBODY SURELY HAND-PICKED THE RIGHT IMBECILE TO SIT ON THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH AS HOLMAN'S STOOGE  WHEN HE/THEY SELECTED LAPDOG COLLIER!

IT IS OBVIOUS THAT LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER CAN RIGHTLY LAY CLAIM TO THE TITLE OF VILLAGE IDIOT!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

JUDGES IN THE STATE OF HAWAII KNOW MORE ABOUT OHIO LAW THAN LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER!

It is quite understandably perplexing that judges in the State of Hawaii know more about the law of the State of Ohio than LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER.

FOLLOWING IS AN EXCERPT TAKEN FROM A DECISION RENDERED BY THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAII, REFERENCING OHIO LAW, WHICH LAPDOG COLLIER EITHER DOES NOT KNOW OR, IN THE REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE, INTENTIONALLY DISREGARDED IN FAVOR OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN:

STATE v. OKUBO

STATE of Hawai‘i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter T. OKUBO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 23637.

-- July 11, 2002

WATANABE, Acting C.J., LIM and FOLEY, JJ.

In Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 100 S.Ct. 906, 63 L.Ed.2d 186 (1980), the Supreme Court held:

Our consideration of the foundations for the privilege and its history satisfy us that “reason and experience” no longer justify so sweeping a rule as that found acceptable by the Court in Hawkins [v. United States, 358 U.S. 74, 79 S.Ct. 136, 3 L.Ed.2d 125 (1958) (the testimony of one spouse against the other barred unless both consent) ].   Accordingly, we conclude that the existing rule should be modified so that the witness-spouse alone has a privilege to refuse to testify adversely;  the witness may be neither compelled to testify nor foreclosed from testifying.

445 U.S. at 53, 100 S.Ct. at 914.

Okubo relies on State v. Adamson, 72 Ohio St.3d 431, 650 N.E.2d 875 (1995), for its holding that a testifying spouse is incompetent to testify unless the spouse elects to waive that privilege.   In Adamson, the Supreme Court of Ohio, in finding the trial court committed reversible plain error when it failed to inform the spouse that it was her choice whether or not to testify and that the court could not force her to do so, stated:

[T]he trial court ignored the level of protection the Rules of Evidence provide.   While Evid.R. 601 was amended in 1991 to allow the spouse the decision as to whether to testify against the accused spouse (the decision formerly lay with the accused), the rule still contains important protections for the accused, since it deals with the competency of persons testifying against him.

The rule requires that the testifying spouse elect to testify against her spouse.   An election is “[t]he choice of an alternative[;][t]he internal, free, and spontaneous separation of one thing from another, without compulsion, consisting in intention and will.”   Black's Law Dictionary (5 ed.1990) 517.   Thus, under Evid.R. 601(B), a spouse remains incompetent to testify until she makes a deliberate choice to testify, with knowledge of her right to refuse.

72 Ohio St.3d at 434, 650 N.E.2d at 877 (emphasis in original).

Ohio does not have spousal privilege analogous to HRE Rule 505.   The Adamson court addressed spousal testimony pursuant to the Ohio Rules of Evidence Rule 601, which provides in relevant part:

EVID R 601 GENERAL RULE OF COMPETENCY

Every person is competent to be a witness except:

(A) Those of unsound mind, and children under ten years of age, who appear incapable of receiving just impressions of the facts and transactions respecting which they are examined, or of relating them truly.

(B) A spouse testifying against the other spouse charged with a crime except when either of the following applies:

(1) a crime against the testifying spouse or a child of either spouse is charged;

(2) the testifying spouse elects to testify.

Under Ohio Rules of Evidence Rule 601, the spouse testifying against the spouse charged with a crime is first presumed incompetent.   Hawai‘i Rules of Evidence Rule 505 does not have this presumption.

This case can be found and read in its entirety at http://caselaw.findlaw.com/hi-intermediate-court-of-appeals/1321384.html 

You will note that the Adamson case was decided 16 years ago!  You might think that LAPDOG COLLIER might be aware of this decision by now, wouldn't you, before compelling the wife of the defendant to testify AFTER SHE ASSERTED HER SPOUSAL PRIVILEGE?


The question that now arises is simply:

IS LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER IGNORANT, CORRUPT, OR MORE LIKELY, BOTH?


JUST ONE MORE REASON WHY THE MEDINA COURTS NEED TO BE THOROUGHLY INVESTIGATED BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, CALLS THE BLOGGER A "COWARD!" ISN'T THAT A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF THE POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK!

In a yet another rather amusing and ironic twist, Medina Ass. prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, has sent yet one more email message to this blog, in which SALISBURY calls this blogger a "coward."

How amusing, and how interesting at the same time.

HERE ARE EXCERPTS FROM THE MOST RECENT EMAIL MESSAGE FROM SALSIBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR:

"You coward! Nice to see you making more groundless accusations"

What a laugher, and evidence of the desperation over at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosques & Railroad Station.

Firstly, it is obvious that, under pressure, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, has toned down his rhetoric dramatically.  Regular readers of the blog will undoubtedly recall that SALISBURY previously referred to this blogger as a "SPIC," a "NIGGER," and a "SAND NIGGER."


You can easily find SALISBURY'S RACIST RANTS in prior postings in this blog at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/03/salisbury-continues-to-lie-claims-he.html AND http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/03/salisbury-although-slow-learner-is.html, AND ALSO AT http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/04/assistant-prosecutor-scott-salisbury.html and other similar postings.

Unfortunately, SALISBURY'S RACIST RANTS have the silent approval of the Medina County Commissioners. [See http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/04/medina-county-commissioners-quietly.html ]

As for the issue of COWARDICE, IT WOULD BE USEFUL TO REVIEW THE CONDUCT OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, IN THAT REGARD:

1. Isn't it SALISBURY who taunts and threatens chained and shackled defendants in the courtroom of LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER?
2. Isn't it SALISBURY who berates defenseless women, mothers and sisters of defendants in LAPDOG COLLIER'S COURTROOM with the most vile and crude language, all under the approving eye of LAPDOG COLLIER?
3. Isn't it SALISBURY, who so FEARS FAILURE that he resorts to fabricating evidence? [See http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/02/collier-applauds-as-salisbury.html ]
4. Isn't it SALISBURY, who so FEARS FAILURE that he withholds favorable evidence from defendants? [See http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/02/salisbury-hid-favorable-evidence-from.html ]
5. Isn't it SALISBURY, who so FEARS FAILURE that he has to lie and cheat during the "proceedings before LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER? [See http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/03/salisbury-pathological-liar-lies-openly.html AND http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/04/salisbury-pathological-liar-lies-again.html AND ALSO AT http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/05/caught-again-salisbury-patological-liar.html
6. And isn't it SALISBURY, who so FEARS FAILURE that he cannot discharge his "duties" honestly and ethically, but instead has to rely on LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, A COMPLETELY WORTHLESS AND CORRUPT "ATTORNEY," to prejudice the jury and to steer a jury to a conviction? [See http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/04/salisbury-pathological-liar-leads.html ]

BASED UPON ALL OF THE ABOVE FACTORS, IT CERTAINLY SEEMS REASONABLE TO CONCLUDE THAT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, FINISHES AT THE VERY TOP OF THE HEAP IN THE COWARDICE DEPARTMENT. 

It is further interesting to note that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, claims this blogger is making "groundless accusations."  That is certainly another laugher.

Apparently SALISBURY has not yet read the 350-page Complaint to the Disciplinary Counsel of the Ohio Supreme Court  [See http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/03/ohio-supreme-court-to-probe-collier.html  ] or all of the compelling evidence that convicts him of his unethical and unlawful conduct [See http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/02/exhibit-1-common-pleas-docket-exhibit-2.html].


SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, is also oblivious to the many excerpts taken directly from the trial transcript, and displayed at this blog, that DOCUMENT SALISBURY'S DISHONESTY AND LACK OF INTEGRITY!


In light of all of the above facts and evidence it is certainly obvious that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, IS LYING TO HIMSELF!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, ADMITS, "YOU DON'T KNOW THE HALF OF IT!"

Medina County Ass. prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, just can't refrain from sending email messages to this blog!

SALISBURY JUST SENT A SMUG AND ARROGANT MESSAGE  TO THE  BLOG, EXCERPTED BELOW:


"you know nothing about real corruption in Medina County"


It would seem that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, is taunting the blogger and suggesting that the CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS RUNS EVEN DEEPER THAN CONFIRMED BY THE DAMNING EVIDENCE PRESENTED HERE! 


The Blogger will just have to dig deeper into the UNDERBELLY of the PUBLIC CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS!


The very words of SALISBURY demonstrate the very real necessity for an independent criminal investigation of the Medina County Courts conducted by the Criminal Division of the United States Department of Justice!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....,

WILL DINO HOLMAN PROSECUTE THE SEX SLAVES OF CONGRESSMAN ANTHONY WEINER?

As regular readers of this blog will recall, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR gained a certain amount of notoriety for prosecuting Ms. Krista Harris, the purported SEX SLAVE OF HOLMAN'S BEST BUD, ERIE COUNTY PROSECUTOR KEVIN BAXTER.


YOU MAY RECALL THAT MS. HARRIS, AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMAN AND A WITNESS IN AN ERIE COUNTY HOMICIDE TRIAL PROSECUTED BY BAXTER, ENGAGED IN SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH BAXTER PRIOR TO TRIAL!


When Ms. Harris refused to play ball with HOLMAN'S BEST BUD, KEVIN BAXTER, by refusing to offer PERJURED TESTIMONY AGAINST ANOTHER DEFENDANT IN THE SAME MATTER, BAXTER DECIDED IT WAS TIME TO TAKE A LITTLE REVENGE.


BAXTER called upon his best bud DINO HOLMAN to bring what appears to be a malicious prosecution against Ms. Harris.  HOLMAN, of course, obliged.


You may wish to refresh concerning those particulars by reading the post found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/holman-implicated-in-malicious.html


It would seem that hell hath no fury like a CORRUPT DEMOCRAT PROSECUTOR scorned.


Now that DEMOCRAT NEW YORK CONGRESSMAN ANTHONY WEINER has fessed up, it is anyone's guess whether CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN will jump into the fray and prosecute Weiner's sex slaves,  JUST LIKE HE PROSECUTED BAXTER'S SEX SLAVE.


Proof and evidence will not be a problem for HOLMAN.  With his years of experience, he can easily trump up a number of charges.


As for those troublesome Tweets from Weiner that may have value to a defense attorney, NO PROBLEM! HOLMAN CAN JUST HAND THEM OFF TO LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER WHO WILL SIMPLY MAKE THEM DISAPPEAR.  LAPDOG COLLIER IS REALLY GOOD AT MAKING EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO A DEFENDANT DISAPPEAR. Congressman Weiner can be assured that those Tweets will never see the light of day ever again!


One can only imagine that, if successful, HOW MANY MORE HAND-PICKED LACKEYS HOLMAN CAN APPOINT TO POLITICAL OFFICE IN MEDINA COUNTY, WITHOUT HAVING TO FACE ANY OPPONENTS IN THOSE INFAMOUS RIGGED MEDINA COUNTY "ELECTIONS."


Should that come to pass, CORRUPT MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER WOULD THEN NO LONGER BE THE SOLE LACKEY AND LAPDOG OF HOLMAN!


If HOLMAN should prevail on the Quixotic quest of prosecuting Weiner's sex slaves as he did in the case of BAXTER'S SEX SLAVE, then HOLMAN'S PERSONAL MOTTO will likely ring in the hallowed halls of the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station for years to come:

"Lie a little, lie a lot! What's the difference?"

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, IS PREPARED TO CONVICT SANTA CLAUS

LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER CAN RIGHTLY LAY CLAIM TO THE TITLE OF VILLAGE IDIOT WITH THIS LEGAL OPINION!


LAPDOG COLLIER, who has been nothing more than a puppet for CORRUPT MEDINA PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN for many years, is prepared to CONVICT SANTA CLAUS AT THE WHIM AND WISH OF HOLMAN.


While LAPDOG COLLIER is not noted for his brilliance (in fact, LAPDOG COLLIER is quite the dullard; See http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/11/garbage-in-garbage-out.html), the following not-so-well reasoned opinion by LAPDOG COLLIER simply takes the cake.


Regular readers of this blog will recall that the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT has ruled that an uncorroborated tip from an informant is not sufficient to establish probable cause for an arrest of a citizen.  Suspicion, OR BELIEF, is not enough, but requires a certain amount of fact-finding by the officer.

This bulwark in the laws of arrest and search & seizure can be easily found by reading the 1983 UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HOLDINGS in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, an overview of which can be found at http://supreme.justia.com/us/462/213/

Of course, LAPDOG COLLIER believes differently.

PRESENTED HERE IS THE COMPLETELY INCORRECT STATEMENT OF THE LAW OF ARREST AND SEARCH & SEIZURE PRESENTED BY LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, TAKEN FROM PAGE 237 OF THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPT.


LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, ADDRESSING DEFENSE COUNSEL, SAID:

"Let me stop you for a second.

Whether they were - - it doesn't matter, frankly, what happened. What matters is what they believed at the time they made the arrest. That's the key.  What the police officer had a reasonable articulable belief for making a determination as to whether or not the arrest was a proper arrest or not.  If subsequent to that there are - - there is some indication that the information they received was not correct, or was different from the information they did received, that's interesting, but it doesn't invalidate the warrant or doesn't invalidate the arrest.  The arrest is on the information they have.  Did a reasonable officer, under these circumstances, reasonably believe that this offense occurred."

WHAT A COMPLETE AND TOTAL MORON!

This "opinion" by LAPDOG COLLIER  demonstrates just how little he comprehends of the law.


IT'S NOT WHAT AN OFFICER BELIEVES BUT, RATHER, IT'S WHAT AN OFFICER KNOWS AT THE TIME OF ARREST!


This is precisely the level of incompetence that arises from LAPDOG COLLIER being granted a lifetime, uncontested appointment to the Medina County Bench by CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.


Under LAPDOG COLLIER'S theory of the law, one of the Medina County Sheriff's Deputies like Douglas Clinage or Frank Telatko, who have obviously had advanced police training in Pennsylvania from the KEYSTONE COPS, could actually believe that Santa came down the chimney and ate all those chocolate chip cookies on the kitchen counter.


Based upon that unfounded belief, according to LAPDOG COLLIER, the next passerby wearing a Santa Claus suit could be arrested and charged with Burglary, and if Santa just happened to bring a BB gun down the chimney, he could be charged with AGGRAVATED BURGLARY.  


ACCORDING TO LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT WOULD BE A PERFECTLY JUSTIFIABLE ARREST IN MEDINA COUNTY.


Such, however, is not the state of the law outside of Medina County.  AN ARREST CANNOT BE BASED UPON BELIEF, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS SUSPICION.


There is a wide body of law which permits an officer to make an arrest ONLY UPON THE FACTS KNOWN TO THE OFFICER.


FACTS AND BELIEF ARE WIDELY DIFFERING LEGAL CONCEPTS, AT LEAST OUTSIDE MEDINA COUNTY.


THE LEVEL OF IGNORANCE AND INCOMPETENCE DISPLAYED BY LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER WOULD SEEM TO RISE TO THE LEVEL OF CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE.


IT IS CLEAR FROM HIS OWN LEGAL THEORY, AS SET FORTH ABOVE, THAT LAPDOG COLLIER CAN RIGHTLY LAY CLAIM TO THE TITLE OF VILLAGE IDIOT!


MUCH MORE TO COME .....