EXONERATED !!!!!

AT LONG LAST, A FAIR-MINDED JURY HAS EXONERATED THE INNOCENT MAN, RAILROADED BY "JUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER MORE THAN 9 YEARS AGO, BY FINDING HIM NOT GUILTY OF THE OFFENSE OF AGGRAVATED BURGLARY WHERE THERE HAS NEVER BEEN ANY COMPETENT, CREDIBLE EVIDENCE THAT HE COMMITTED THE ALLEGED OFFENSE.

THIS INNOCENT MAN, FRAMED BY CORRUPT FORMER MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN, BY AND THROUGH THE DELIBERATE PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT OF HIS ASS ATTORNEYS SCOTT SLEAZEBURY AND MUSTAFAH FAOUQUOD RAZAVI, AND THE EGREGIOUS JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OF CORRUPT "JUDGES" WEASELPECKER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE (WHO ALWAYS FIT SNUGLY IN HOEMAN'S POCKET) AND RICHARD MARKUS, CHIEF AMONG MORONS.

AS REGULAR READERS OF THIS BLOG WELL KNOW, THIS CASE HAS BEEN TWICE REVERSED ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, FACILITATED AND ENCOURAGED BY "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER AND MORON MARKUS. 

AFTER THE SECOND TRIAL AND CONVICTION WAS OVERTURNED BY THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS FOR PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, THE COURT OF APPEALS NOT SO GENTLY "SUGGESTED" THIS CASE BE REASSIGNED TO ANOTHER PROSECUTOR BASED ON THE GROUNDS, AS STATED BY THE NINTH DISTRICT, THAT SLEAZEBURY AND FAOUQUOD RAZAVI HAD PROVEN THEY COULD NOT BE OBJECTIVE IN THIS CASE.

IN STEPS THE OFFICE OF THEN-CUYAHOGA COUNTY PROSECUTOR TIMOTHY MCGINTY, PREVIOUSLY CONVICTED OF DRUNK DRIVING IN MEDINA COUNTY, REQUESTED BY DINO HOEMAN TO CONDUCT YET A THIRD TRIAL ON THE SAME CONSTITUTIONALLY DEFECTIVE ONE COUNT INDICTMENT FILED IN 2009.

OF COURSE, MCGINTY WAS DEFEATED IN AN ELECTION BY FORMER PARMA SAFETY DIRECTOR MICHAEL C. O'MALLEY WHOM THE BLOGGER INITIALLY THOUGHT MIGHT BE  A REASONABLE INDIVIDUAL. NOT SO!

O'MALLEY HAS TURNED OUT TO BE JUST ONE MORE DUMBASS INTOXICATED BY THE POWER OF HIS OFFICE. CUYAHOGA ASS PROSECUTOR CHRISTOPHER SCROTUM, WHO CLAIMS TO HAVE BEEN "PROMOTED" TO THE POSITION OF "MANAGING ATTORNEY" BY O'MALLEY WAS CLEARLY A BIG MISTAKE GIVEN HIS UNETHICAL CONDUCT AT TRIAL. THAT, OF COURSE, SPEAKS TO O'MALLEY'S OWN LACK OF JUDGMENT.

O'MALLEY, WHO HAS REFUSED TO DISCUSS THIS CASE WITH DEFENSE COUNSEL, APPOINTED TWO OF HIS PREMIER ASS PROSECUTORS, CHRISTOPHER SCROTUM AND ANDREW JOCKITCH, TO CARRY THIS CASE FORWARD.

THROUGHOUT THE PERIOD PRECEDING THE THIRD TRIAL, SCROTUM AND JOCKITCH REFUSED TO RESOLVE THIS CASE BY ANYTHING OTHER THAN A PLEA TO A FELONY.

THAT WAS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN GIVEN THE FACT THE INNOCENT CITIZEN THAT HOEMAN AND "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN FRAMED FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENSE OF AGGRAVATED BURGLARY!

WHY DO YOU, THE READERS, SUSPECT THAT SCROTUM AND JOCKITCH REFUSED TO RESOLVE THIS CASE JUSTLY AFTER THE INNOCENT CITIZEN SERVED MORE THAN 6 YEARS OF A 5-YEAR PRISON SENTENCE UNCONSTITUTIONALLY IMPOSED BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY "JUDGE WEASELPECKER COLLIER? 

AS SCROTUM AND JOCKITCH OPENLY ADMITTED, THEY NEEDED A FELONY CONVICTION TO PREVENT THIS INNOCENT FROM BRINGING A LAWSUIT AGAINST THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, HOEMAN, "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER, AND COLLIER'S MISTRESS, COURT REPORTER DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY WHO, IN PART, CONSPIRED TO FILE A CORRUPTED, MATERIALLY ALTERED TRANSCRIPT OF THE FIRST TRIAL IN THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS.

THAT MOTIVE IS AND WAS A MAJOR ETHICAL LAPSE!

AS IT TURNS OUT, THE UNETHICAL CONDUCT OF SCROTUM AND JOCKITCH DID NOT ACHIEVE THE INTENDED OBJECTIVE.

THE THIRD TRIAL, BASED UPON THE SAME CONSTITUTIONALLY DEFECTIVE ONE-COUNT INDICTMENT,  FILED IN 2009, COMMENCED IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2018 BEFORE A VISITING JUDGE.

AFTER SEATING A FAIR-MINDED JURY OF INTELLIGENT MEDINA COUNTY CITIZENS, SCROTUM AND JOCKITCH PRESENTED THEIR UNCONVINCING "CASE" TO THE JURY.

WHY, MIGHT YOU THE READERS, WONDER WHY THEIR CASE WAS UNCONVINCING? THE SIMPLE FACT IS THAT, FOR THE THIRD TIME, AND ABSENT THE INFLUENCE OF A CORRUPT JUDGE UPON THE JURY, THEY HAD NO COMPETENT AND CREDIBLE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT A CONVICTION UPON THE OFFENSE OF AGGRAVATED BURGLARY!

THE TRIAL STARTED OUT WITH A BANG! SCROTUM AND JOCKITCH CALLED THEIR LEAD WITNESS FIRST, RELYING UPON THAT WITNESS TO CARRY THEIR CASE.

THE JUDGE SWORE THE STATE'S FIRST WITNESS, AS IS USUAL AND CUSTOMARY. WHEN ASKED IF HE SWORE TO "TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH," THE WITNESS ANSWERED, "NO!"

THERE IS MUCH ABOUT THIS TRIAL TO RELATE TO READERS, WHICH THE BLOGGER WILL REVEAL IN FUTURE POSTS, INCLUDING TESTIMONY GIVEN UNDER OATH THAT PROVES UNEQUIVOCALLY THAT "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER AND HIS MISTRESS MATERIALLY ALTERED THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE FIRST TRIAL!

CUTTING NOW TO THE CHASE, YESTERDAY, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2018, THE CASE WENT TO THE JURY FOR DELIBERATION AT 12:30 PM.

AT 4:20 PM YESTERDAY, THE JURY FUND THIS FRAMED, INNOCENT CITIZEN "NOT GUILTY" OF THE CHARGED OFFENSE OF AGGRAVATED BURGLARY!  EXONERATED AT LAST!

AFTER THE READING OF THE VERDICT, SCROTUM AND JOCKITCH PACKED UP THEIR KIT BAG AND SKULKED WITH THEIR TAILS BETWEEN THEIR LEGS OUR OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE, MOSQUE, RAILROAD STATION AND BROTHEL AND HEADED BACK NORTH TO THE LAND OF THE CLEVES.

THERE ARE MANY INDIVIDUALS TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THIS TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. THOSE DAYS LIE HAPPILY AHEAD.