A LOOK FORWARD TO LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER'S FUTURE CAREER OPTIONS

THIS IS A MULTI-MEDIA POST.  

PLEASE "CLICK" ON THE ATTACHED LINK, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDktBZzQIiU ,  WHICH SHOULD OPEN IN A SECOND BROWSER WINDOW..  START THE MUSIC AND THEN RETURN TO THIS WINDOW AND READ THE POST BELOW 


As we are  through the EVIDENCE of LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER'S corrupt conduct presented in the MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT, which turns out to be an expose of the corruption endemic in the Medina County "JUSTUS" system, it is apparent that LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER will not escape this scandal unscathed.

GIVEN THE FACT THAT THE EVIDENCE POINTS SQUARELY AT LAPDOG COLLIER AS THE THIRD-RATE,  LOW-RENT, BOTTOM-FEEDING, SCUM-SUCKING, GRAVE-ROBBING, AMBULANCE-CHASING, SCUMBAG MEDINA ATTORNEY WITH NO MORE CHARACTER THAN A BLOWFLY MAGGOT HIDING BEHIND THE ALIAS "PUBLIUS," IT ONLY SEEMS APPROPRIATE TO LOOK  TO LAPDOG'S CAREER "OPTIONS," GOING FORWARD.

PEERING INTO A CRYSTAL BALL, LET US SEE WHAT THE FUTURE MAY HOLD FOR LAPDOG COLLIER . . .

GIVEN ALL OF THE TRANSCRIPTS THAT COLLIER AND HIS MAIN SQUEEZE DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY HAVE ALTERED OVER THESE PAST 11 YEARS OR SO, THIS CAREER "CHOICE" SEEMS MORE THAN FITTING.

THERE IS GOOD SIGNAGE SO THAT HIS MAIL WILL BE DELIVERED WITHOUT DELAY.

LAPDOG'S OLD FRIENDS, BOTH OF THEM, WILL HAVE NO TROUBLE AT ALL KEEPING IN TOUCH.

OF COURSE, THE FIRST QUESTION THAT COMES TO MIND IS HOW LAPDOG WILL TRANSITION TO HIS NEW CAREER "CHOICE." LET'S SEE WHAT THE CRYSTAL BALL MAY REVEAL ABOUT THIS VERY MATTER . . .

THAT IS ONE PROBLEM SOLVED!  THE NEXT QUESTION THAT ARISES IS JUST WHO  WILL BE THERE TO RECEIVE HIM IN HIS NEW CAREER "CHOICE."  LET'S TURN BACK TO THE CRYSTAL BALL . . .

WHAT DO YOU KNOW?  THERE IS A RECEPTION COMMITTEE WAITING TO WELCOME LAPDOG AND MAKE HIS STAY AS ENJOYABLE AS POSSIBLE.  NOTHING CAN REPLACE GOOD FELLOWSHIP BETWEEN COLLIER AND HIS NEW  FRIENDS.

SOON AFTER ARRIVAL, LAPDOG CAN LOOK FORWARD TO THE INITIATION CEREMONY, A GESTURE OF GOOD WILL AMONG HIS PEERS.

AND WHAT OF THE ACCOMMODATIONS AT HIS NEW CAREER "CHOICE?"

WHAT A RELIEF! LAPDOG COLLIER WON'T BE LONELY, TO BE SURE.

GOOD, SOLID MEALS ARE SERVED CAFETERIA STYLE, WITH "SECONDS" AVAILABLE ACCOMPANIED BY GOOD CONVERSATION AT MEALS.

WHAT, DOES THE CRYSTAL BALL SAY, ABOUT WHAT LAPDOG COLLIER WILL BE DOING WITH HIS FREE TIME, WHEN HE ISN'T BUSY ALTERING TRANSCRIPTS?  IT SEEMS SEVERAL OPTIONS ARE AVAILABLE TO HIM . . . 

WELL, LAPDOG CAN SPEND TIME SOAKING IN THE GRANDEUR OF THE LOCAL ARCHITECTURE . . .

OR, HE CAN TAKE CLASSES IN ARTS AND CRAFTS . . .

OR PARTICIPATE IN ORGANIZED PHYSICAL EXERCISE  ACTIVITIES, LIKE DANCE CLASS . . .

OR AEROBICS . . .

 OR PUSH-UPS . . . 

OR PRACTICE HIS ARTWORK . . .

OR EVEN WORKOUT WITH A PERSONAL TRAINER . . .

HE MAY EVEN ADOPT A PET.

LAPDOG WILL HAVE AMPLE TIME FOR HIS PERSONAL SPIRITUAL GROWTH . . .

AND, IF HE CHOOSES, LAPDOG CAN EVEN JOIN THE CHOIR.

COLLIER WILL HAVE TIME TO DEVELOP NEW FRIENDS, EVEN PEN PALS, WITH THE SAME VALUES HE HOLDS SO DEAR . . .

THEN AGAIN, THERE WILL BE MONTHLY MEETINGS OF SOME OF LAPDOG'S OTHER PEERS, ATTORNEYS FROM THE MEDINA COUNTY BAR & PICKPOCKET ASSOCIATION, SIMILARLY SITUATED TO LAPDOG COLLIER . . .

LAPDOG MAY VERY WELL BE ABLE TO HOLD COURT AS WELL . . .

OF COURSE, LAPDOG WILL HAVE TO TRY TO AVOID THOSE LITTLE DISAGREEMENTS BETWEEN HIS PEERS THAT OCCUR FROM TIME TO TIME.

LAPDOG WILL HAVE AMPLE PRIVATE TIME TO BE ALONE WITH HIS THOUGHTS.

 


LAPDOG WILL HAVE ENOUGH TIME TO MEDITATE, AS WELL.

IF EVER LAPDOG FINDS HIMSELF FEELING DOWN AND BLUE, HE CAN PARTICIPATE IN GROUP THERAPY SESSIONS.

WHEN HE TURNS DOWN THE COVERS AT NIGHT, LAPDOG WILL BE DREAMING OF THIS . . .

BUT WHEN HE AWAKENS IN THE MORNING, HE'LL BE LOOKING AT THIS . . . 

OF COURSE, LAPDOG WON'T BE HAVING CONJUGAL VISITS WITH DONNA GARRITY, HIS MAIN SQUEEZE ANYTIME SOON.

THERE ARE SOME LIMITED DOWNSIDES TO "PUBLIUS" COLLIER'S NEW CAREER CHOICE, LIMITED THOUGH THEY MAY BE.

LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER LIKELY WON'T BE ATTENDING HIS DAUGHTER'S WEDDING.  THAT, OF COURSE, PRESUMES THAT HE WOULD EVEN BE INVITED.

AND LAPDOG WON'T LIKELY BE AROUND TO WELCOME HIS GRANDKIDS INTO THE WORLD.

 ALTHOUGH, TO BE SURE, LAPDOG'S DAUGHTER AND SON-IN-LAW WILL MOST CERTAINLY KEEP HIM UPDATED WITH THE MOST RECENT FAMILY PHOTOS.

WHEN ALL IS SAID AND DONE, WE WISH LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER MUCH SUCCESS IN HIS NEW CAREER "CHOICE."  IT IS SO RICHLY DESERVED!!!

LAPDOG'S COURT REPORTER AND MISTRESS BENEFITS FROM WORKING "UNDER" HIM !

Shown below is the THIRTY-NINTH AND FINAL installment of the MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT, which LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER and the Republicrats at the Medina County Courthouse, Mosque & Railroad Station do not want you, the citizens, to see.  You can cross-reference any exhibits to the List of Exhibits by "CLICKING" on the link shown directly below "PAGES" at the upper right-hand corner of the web page:

Judge Collier Has Facilitated Apparent Thefts of Public Funds By His Court Reporter and Mistress, Donna Garrity.

The law is well settled that a court speaks through its docket.  The Ohio Supreme Court has "repeatedly stated that a court speaks exclusively through its journal entries." (citation omitted).  State v. Hawkins, 9^th Dist. No. 11CA0007, 2011-Ohio-6197, ¶ 7.

Inspector Hartman has reviewed a substantial number of cases, tried before Judge Collier, found at the website of the Clerk of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas.  During those reviews, Inspector Hartman has discovered that Judge Collier’s court reporter has made numerous claims for compensation for “services” that are not supported by the docket.

Donna Garrity has been charging fees of $25.00 for each of her appearances in court when the dockets of individual cases fail to show any court activity on the claimed dates.  It is apparent that Judge Collier has turned a blind eye to the apparent thefts of pubic funds by his mistress, court reporter Donna Garrity.  Actually, he has facilitated her thefts because he is the listed judge for the alleged hearings.

Presented below are a limited number of examples, in no particular order, which likely will reveal a larger scheme to defraud taxpayers, upon a more thorough investigation and review:

A.  State v. Kyle Miller, Medina Case No. 12CR0097, Judge Collier

The docket in Case No. 12CR0097, State v. Kyle Miller, contains an entry on July 18, 2014, “CERT FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER’S FEES.”  A copy of the Certificate for Court Stenographer’s Fees submitted by Donna Garrity, reveals that Garrity claimed payment in the amount of  $25.00 for her “services” on July 18, 2014.

The docket does not record any case activity, in court or otherwise, on July 18, 2014.  In fact, the prior docket entry, dated August 9, 2013, is also recorded as “CERT FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER’S FEES.”

A copy of the docket of Case No. 12CR0097, along with a copy of Donna Garrity’s Certificate for Court Stenographer’s Fees, dated July 18, 2014, is attached as Exhibit Forty-Six.

B.  State v. Lynn Vandeusen, Medina Case No. 12CR0388, Judge Collier

The docket in Case No. 12CR0388, State v. Lynn Vandeusen, contains an entry on April 15, 2014, “CERT FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER’S FEES.”  A copy of the Certificate for Court Stenographer’s Fees submitted by Donna Garrity, reveals that Garrity claimed payment in the amount of  $25.00 for her “services” on April 15, 2013.

The docket entry for the same date, April 15, 2013, records “SENTENCING.”  The Sentencing Entry, docketed on April 29, 2013, reveals that Ms. Vandeusen was actually sentenced on April 22, 2013.

There was no sentencing on April 15, 2013, the date on which Donna Garrity claimed payment in the amount of $25.00 from public funds.

A copy of the docket and sentencing entry, along with Garrity’s Certificate for Court Stenographer’s Fees, dated April 15, 2013, are all attached as Exhibit Forty-Seven.

C.  State v. Clegg, Medina Case No. 13CR0126, Judge Collier

The docket entry in Case No. 13CR0126, dated May 30, 2013, records “PRE TRIAL.”  On June 3, 2013, the date of the next docket entry, the docket records, “CERT FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER’S FEES.”  A copy of the Certificate for Court Stenographer’s Fees submitted by Donna Garrity, reveals that Garrity claimed payment in the amount of  $25.00 for her “services” on June 3, 2013.

The docket fails to identify any activity in this case on, or prior to, June 3, 2013, with the exception of the May 30 pre-trial, which normally is an informal meeting of attorneys during which the judge does not take the bench.

A copy of the docket in Case No. 13CR0126, along with Garrity’s Certificate for Court Stenographer’s Fees, dated June 3, 2013, are attached as Exhibit Forty-Eight.

Mr. Hartman has presented a sampling of evidence of apparent false billings by Donna Garrity, supported by case dockets, in the following Medina County criminal cases:

State v. Kyle Miller, Medina Case No. 12CR0097, Judge Collier;

State v. Lynn Vandeusen, Medina Case No. 12CR0388, Judge Collier;

State v. Clegg, Medina Case No. 13CR0126, Judge Collier;

State v. Stevenson, Medina Case No. 09CR0386, Judge Collier;

State v. Dennis Eisele, Medina Case No. 12CR0472, Judge Collier;

State v. James McDonald, Medina Case No. 11CR0267, Judge Collier;

State v. Richard Miles, Medina Case No. 12CR0001, Judge Collier;

State v. George Mose, Medina Case No. 09CR0515, Judge Collier;

State v. Brian Vitt, Medina Case No. 08CR0495, Judge Collier.

THE EVIDENCE CLEARLY SHOWS THAT DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY HAS APPARENTLY ACCRUED CERTAIN FINANCIAL BENEFITS DERIVED FROM WORKING UNDER ILLEGITIMATE "judge" LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER !!!