THE WISDOM OF THE COMMON MAN!

I so often find that I am impressed by the insight and the wisdom of the COMMON MAN.  Set out below is a message posted to Craig's List by an Average Joe who simply gets it!

Mr. Leonard Hutchison spent 14 years in prison for a crime he did not (this just the tip of the iceberg!)

---

Date: 2010-12-29, 7:02AM EST

---

http://mediafilter.org/guest/Pages/February.10.1998.00.21.41. Mr. Leonard Hutchison spent 14 years in prison for a crime he did not commit! Why? Because the police and District Attorney's used false evidence and perjured testimony, yes perjured testimony, to convict Mr. Hutchison. The first trial ended in a hung jury. But the second did not. He was convicted of second-degree attempted murder and spent every day after that trying to prove his innocence. The shooting occurred during an attempted auto theft. The investigators and police collected large amounts of physical evidence from the scene including, burglary tools, bloody clothing, and pictures of the parking lot. Mr. Hutchison, when arrested, also had tools collected from his home as "evidence". The tools were then sent to the FBI crime lab for analysis to see if they could have been used to inflict the damage that had been done to the vehicle, ie. the ignition removed and so on. The results of the lab reports clearly indicated that his tools COULD NOT have been used to do this damage. No question about it. At trial, the jury heard a different story. First, the prosecutor in question did not give the reports to the defense because he said they were inconclusive. Then, at trial the prosecutor, with the aide of the investigating officers, showed the jury how Mr. Hutchisons tools were used on the car, clearly putting him at the scene of the crime. As earlier established by the FBI, his tools could not have been the tools used. Finally, a detective in the case testified that the tools matched according to the lab report! Interestingly enough, this was the very detective that initiated and requested the tests to be done on Mr. Hutchison's tools. Next, the FBI had been involved in an independent investigation of auto theft rings in Knoxville, Tennessee at this time. During this investigation, they uncovered evidence that strongly suggested that another individual committed this crime. 

The Average Joe who posted the above message understands that CORRUPT COPS, CORRUPT PROSECUTORS, and CORRUPT JUDGES unfailingly lead to convictions of innocent citizens on trumped up charges.

SOUNDS EXACTLY LIKE MEDINA COUNTY, WHERE MANUFACTURED "EVIDENCE," CONCEALMENT OF EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO DEFENDANTS, AND PERJURED TESTIMONY ARE ALL THE ORDER OF THE DAY; AND THE COURTS ARE WILLING PARTICIPANTS. 

Readers of the blog may well wish to refresh by revisiting a prior post at this blog entitled, "judge COLLIER, THE CASE FIXER," which is found at  http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/christopher-collier-case-fix.html


The experiences of so many innocent local citizens, very similar to the experience of Leonard Hutchison, is precisely the point of this blog. Further, it's why we need the protections of the United States Constitution that have been denied us in the courts of Medina County.

Moreover, that is precisely WHY WE NEED A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

MORE THREATS FROM THE BOYS AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION

Displayed here are yet more threats from the political hacks over at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station.

As always, the goal is to assault the First Amendment and to suppress the information published at the blog.


FIRST CAME THIS MESSAGE:


you have been doing the same on Craigslist tread carefully and take this blog down and delete all contents before you face civil action from the authorities, who have been notified.

By Anonymous on A LITTLE MORE BACKWOODS JUSTICE FROM WADSWORTH MUN... on 12/30/10

THEN CAME THIS MESSAGE:

we know what you are up to, the authorities have been notified and will shorty find your blog and its contents will be displayed in a court of law.

By Anonymous on "EQUALER PROTECTION" UNDER THE LAW IN MEDINA COUNT... on 12/31/10

As usual, this message was sent to the blog by that COURAGEOUS SOUL, ANONYMOUS.


This blog is obviously having its intended effect of exposing the grime and corruption that pervades the Medina County courts.


I CERTAINLY EXPECT TO HAVE THE CONTENTS OF THIS BLOG DISPLAYED IN A COURT OF LAW, SPECIFICALLY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WHEN THESE CORRUPT "PUBLIC OFFICIALS" ARE FINALLY BROUGHT TO TRIAL AND HELD TO ACCOUNT FOR THEIR CRIMES!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

RECHARGING MEDINA? WE SHOULD CHARGE THEM ALL!

I've once again made another remarkable discovery while Googling the search term "Medina Tea Party."


One of the responses at Google was the following:

Medina Tax Day Tea Party :: ReCharge Medina County

 - 8:15pm

Medina Tax Day Tea Party. By Nancy Abbott. Tax Day Tea Party on the Square in Medina, Ohio 4:00pm - 6:30pm. ReCharge Medina County is proud to be a sponsor ...
www.rechargemedina.org/blog/?p=517 - Cached - Similar

Now it has been my understanding, perhaps my misunderstanding, that the Tea Party has advocated a return to Constitutional fidelity.

It appear that I was clearly mistaken.

After receiving the above Google response, I clicked on the link that took me to the ReCharge Medina website, found at http://www.rechargemedina.org/blog/?p=517

Interestingly, I've taken this quote from the  Medina Tea Partiers' website:


"“The Tea Party effort is just a small piece of a much larger movement aimed at restoring the basic free-market principles our country was built on. The Constitution, for the most part, is being ignored by our current government and Americans are working together to correct the problem."


I suppose the Tea Partiers intend to refer to the Obama administration.  I would suggest that they look around a little closer to home.


I was curious as to who might be these "Tea Party Patriot" who might conceivably be interested in returning the Rule of Law to Medina by fidelity to the United States Constitution, so i clicked on the tab "RECHARGE FOUNDING MEMBERS."

Depicted below is what I found:

ReCharge Founding Members

Debbie Collier

Representative Bill Batchelder

Recorder Colleen Swedyk

Kathryn & Vance Truman

Commissioner Sharon Ray

Kevin Dunn

Commissioner Steve Hambley

Medina Muni Clerk of Court Nancy Abbott

Sarah McIlvaine

Mayor Jane Leaver

Perhaps I'm just a cynic, but I see no promise here for a return to fidelity to the United States Constitution.  It seems that two of the founding members, DEBBIE COLLIER and SARAH MCILVAINE, are wives of two Medina judges who daily violate the Constitution.

Then we have Medina County COMMISSIONERS STEVE HAMBLEY and SHARON RAY.  You may recollect that they were sent email messages calling for action to address the public corruption in the Medina County courts.  Neither has responded. 

To view the content of the email messages sent to HAMBLEY and RAY displayed at this blog, you can go to the post entitled, "DO YOU THINK MEDINA COUNTY POLITICIANS WILL REALLY POLICE THEMSELVES?" which you can find at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/11/do-you-think-medina-politicians-will.html  


THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT THIS "REVOLUTIONARY NEW POLITICAL MOVEMENT" CALLED THE TEA PARTY, AT LEAST IN MEDINA COUNTY, IS NOTHING MORE THAN AN AGGREGATE OF THE SAME OLD POLITICIANS DOING WHAT THEVE ALWAYS DONE ... DEPRIVE YOU OF YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

SALISBURY, THE POET, CONTINUES TO STEAL YOUR TAX DOLLARS AS HE CONTINUES HIS ASSAULT ON THE FIRST AMENDMENT!

An interesting new development has emerged in the ongoing tale of crime and corruption in the Medina County courts.

A reader of this blog has sent along the following, posted on Craig's List by assistant prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY a/k/a SLEAZEBURY (for obvious reasons).

The Blogs Last Mile

---

Date: 2010-12-27, 3:04PM EST

---

Just sit right back and you'll hear a tale,
A tale of a spiteful bitch
That started in medina oh
and now sits on craigslist.

The mate was a mighty sailing man,
The skipper brave and sure.
Five passengers set sail that day
For a three hour tour, a three hour tour.

The weather started getting rough,
The tiny blog was tossed,
If not for the courage of the fearless crew
The blog would be lost, the blog would be lost.

The blog set ground on the shore of this uncensored silly site
With Gilligan
The Skipper too,
The millionaire and his wife,
The movie star
The professor and Mary Ann,
Here on Rants and Raves.

Starring:
Mathew Hartman as Gilligan
Paul Hartman as the skipper
Collier and Salisbury as the millionaire and his wife
Debbie Collier as the movie star
Melissa Shartle Hartman as Maryann
Yours truly as the professor.

So this is the tale of the castaways,
They're here for a long, long time,
They'll have to make the best of things,
It's an uphill climb.

The first mate and the Skipper too,
Will do their very best,
To make the others miserable,
In the rants and raves craigslist.

No brains, no guts no truth to it,
Not a single fact that's true,
Like Robinson Crusoe,
He made it up for you.

So join us here next week my friends,
You're sure to get a smile,
From seven stranded castways,
Here on "The Blogs Last Mile"

SLEAZEBURY, ALTHOUGH QUITE THE POET, IS NOT LIKELY TO RIVAL WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE IN METER AND RHYME.

Setting aside SALISBURYS's vain attempts at humor and to suppress this blog, exposing the crime and corruption in the Medina County courts, and his prominent role in all of this mess, there is the issue of just what SLEAZEBURY is doing when he's being PAID BY TAXPAYERS TO WORK.

WHEN YOU LOOK AT SLEAZEBURY'S MESSAGE ABOVE, YOU ARE LOOKING AT BONA FIDE EVIDENCE OF A FELONY CRIME!

COLLIER AND SALISBURY ARE GOING TO HAVE A HARD TIME HIDING THIS EVIDENCE!

DEPRIVING TAXPAYERS OF THE HONEST SERVICES TO WHICH THEY ARE DUE, AND FOR WHICH THEY PAID, IS JUST ONE MORE FELONY CRIME, THEFT IN OFFICE.

2921.41 Theft in office.

(A) No public official or party official shall commit any theft offense, as defined in division (K) of section 2913.01 of the Revised Code, when either of the following applies:

(1) The offender uses the offender’s office in aid of committing the offense or permits or assents to its use in aid of committing the offense;

(2) The property or service involved is owned by this state, any other state, the United States, a county, a municipal corporation, a township, or any political subdivision, department, or agency of any of them, is owned by a political party, or is part of a political campaign fund.

(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of theft in office. Except as otherwise provided in this division, theft in office is a felony of the fifth degree. If the value of property or services stolen is five hundred dollars or more and is less than five thousand dollars, theft in office is a felony of the fourth degree. If the value of property or services stolen is five thousand dollars or more, theft in office is a felony of the third degree.

TURNING NOW TO SECTION:

2913.01 Theft and fraud general definitions.

As used in this chapter, unless the context requires that a term be given a different meaning:

(E) “Services” include labor, personal services, professional services, rental services, public utility services including wireless service as defined in division (F)(1) of section 4931.40 of the Revised Code, common carrier services, and food, drink, transportation, entertainment, and cable television services and, for purposes of section 2913.04 of the Revised Code, include cable services as defined in that section.

(K) “Theft offense” means any of the following:

(1) A violation of section 2911.01, 2911.02, 2911.11, 2911.12, 2911.13, 2911.31, 2911.32, 2913.02, 2913.03, 2913.04, 2913.041, 2913.05,2913.06, 2913.11, 2913.21, 2913.31, 2913.32, 2913.33, 2913.34, 2913.40, 2913.42, 2913.43, 2913.44, 2913.45, 2913.47, former section2913.47 or 2913.48, or section 2913.51, 2915.05, or 2921.41 of the Revised Code;

You will note that the above little ditty was posted by SLEAZEBURY to Craig's List at 3:04 PM EST ON DECEMBER 27, 2010, DURING WORKING HOURS.

I have been informed that SLEAZEBURY has spending entire days on Craig's List, for days on end, likely depriving TAXPAYERS of thousands of dollars in paid income that he did not earn. A little forensic computer analysis can easily establish the precise amount of the loss to taxpayers.


NOW, THOSE ARE JUST A FEW FACTS THAT SLEAZEBURY'S OVERLOOKED!

This is just ONE MORE FELONY OFFENSE THAT WILL MOST CERTAINLY GO UNINDICTED AND UNPUNISHED BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DEAN HOLMAN.  

JUST A LITTLE MORE EVIDENCE OF THE CRIME AND CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS.

AND STILL MORE EVIDENCE THAT MEDINA COUNTY NEEDS A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

SALISBURY HARASSING MORE INNOCENT CITIZENS!

It has been drawn to my attention that assistant Medina County prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY a/k/a SKIPPY SLEAZEBURY (for obvious reasons) has been harassing innocent citizens, including followers of this blog.

Today, however, it would seem that SLEAZEBURY's attack may be as much personally motivated, over and above his attempts to assault the First Amendment by suppressing this blog.

Take note of a response from one of the individuals whom SALISBURY has been harassing:

Re; Chatty Bitch

---

Date: 2010-12-28, 10:30AM EST

---

Look low life, not sure why you have to be such an ass. Stop the harrassment. I know you can't get over the fact I dumped you. but hey, when I come home and find you having sex with a guy, what was I to do? The mental abuse you caused me was enough of a "disability".
Who is hidind anything? You were the one who refused to come out of the closet. till confronted, and now take out your anger against oters, since you have the power.
Afraid of some blog? What you are hiding is coming out, and your actions here show you for the type of person you are. 

ASIDE FROM THE PERSONAL IMPLICATIONS FOR SLEAZEBURY, HIS ATTACKS ON OTHER CITIZENS IN A PUBLIC FORUM ARE COMPLETELY INAPPROPRIATE.

THIS CONDUCT SAYS AN AWFULLY LOT ABOUT THE CHARACTER AND INTEGRITY OF MEDINA PROSECUTOR DEAN HOLMAN, WHO ENDORSES SUCH CONDUCT BY HIS EMPLOYEES, WHO ARE PAID WITH YOUR TAX DOLLARS.

IN THE REAL WORLD, SLEAZEBURY'S ACTIONS WOULD CLEARLY CONSTITUTE CONDUCT UNBECOMING A PUBLIC EMPLOYEE.

I WOULD SUGGEST THAT ANYONE WHO HAS BEEN HARASSED BY SLEAZEBURY CONTACT ONE OF THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND PUT THEM ON NOTICE THAT SALISBURY IS ENGAGING IN CONDUCT WHICH BRINGS DISREPUTE TO THE COUNTY OF MEDINA.

Perhaps you remember the assistant attorney general in Michigan who was fired for harassing a private citizen?

That's the appropriate action to be taken here.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

SALISBURY ATTACKS A VICTIMIZED FAMILY IN ANOTHER ASSAULT ON THE FIRST AMENDMENT!

A member of a family victimized by crime and corruption in the Medina County Courts has forwarded to me this recent posting by assistant Medina County prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY a/k/a SKIPPY SLEAZEBURY (for obvious reasons) on Craig's List:

Paul Hartman

---

Date: 2010-12-27, 2:02PM EST

---

I'm saving the best for last.
I've politely asked you to stop spamming here.
You refused.
Now nothing is sacred.
Phone #s, addresses, businesses, kids names and schools.
Loads of pics. My own personal craigi-leaks.
Last chance.
Stop or I dump it all.
By the way, you are a fucking asshole.

• it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests

PostingID: 2131223213


I FIND IT INTERESTING THAT SKIPPY SLEAZEBURY, ANOTHER OBVIOUS GRADUATE OF THE SHERLOCK HOME SCHOOL OF INVESTIGATION (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THAT FABLED DETECTIVE, SHERLOCK HOLMES) HAS APPARENTLY DEDUCED THAT THE ABOVE-NAMED INDIVIDUAL IS SOMEHOW RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTENT OF THIS BLOG.  AS ALWAYS, SKIPPY REMAINS CLUELESS.


The first thing to note is that this message was posted to Craig's List on December 27, 2010 at 2:02 pm, DURING SLEAZEBURY'S SCHEDULED "WORK" HOURS.


It should be noted that, instead of "working," SKIPPY is being PAID WITH TAXPAYERS' DOLLARS to post messages on Craig's List.  Depriving citizens of "professional services" for which payment has been made, but no "professional service" was rendered is a FELONY CRIME, THEFT IN OFFICE, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 2921.41 OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE.


You can read the text of the THEFT IN OFFICE statute at http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2921.41

To understand fully, you must then cross-reference to SECTION 2913.01 (E) and (K) of the Ohio Revised Code, to be found at http://66.161.141.185/orc/2913.01

DO YOU THINK THAT HOLMAN WILL ENFORCE THIS STATUTE AGAINST ONE OF HIS OWN?


ACTUALLY, THE TEXT OF SKIPPY'S MESSAGE SOUNDS A BIT LIKE EXTORTION, DOESN'T IT?  THAT, OF COURSE, IS JUST ONE MORE CRIME!


I have, however, spoken with members of this victimized family and have learned that one of their family members has been railroaded by HOLMAN, SLEAZEBURY, and COLLIER in the Medina County courts.

I have had the privilege to review a number of documents produced in this case, which you will not find posted at the website of the Medina County Clerk of Court, and they tell quite a story, indeed.

In fact, I have been authorized by the family to chronicle their account, and to publish any documents I may choose, to reveal the true nature of the CRIME AND CORRUPTION THAT PERVADES THE MEDINA COURTS.  I intend to do just that as this blog progresses.


In my view, some of these documents that I have reviewed are sufficient to support a Federal indictment.


While SLEAZEBURY has posted his message in the manner of  a threat, the family has advised me that any "disclosures" made by SLEAZEBURY will be applauded, since any such disclosures will further serve to indict HOLMAN, COLLIER, AND SLEAZEBURY in the court of public opinion.


It may also facilitate their indictments by the Federal Grand Jury!


KNOCK YOURSELF OUT, SKIPPY!  THE SOONER THE BETTER!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

CITIZENS' RESPONSE TO ANOTHER MEDINA GASETTE ARTICLE!

Once again, George Spudnutt's Medina Gasettte, the official oracle of the Medina County Chamber of Commerce, has struck another blow for the lack of truth, justice, and in support for the Medina Way, all at the behest of the Medina political hacks.

It would appear, from the reader response, that DINO HOLMAN may very well have indicted one more innocent citizen based upon information from less-than reliable informants.


That's nothing new in Medina County.


You may follow this link to the online article featured at the website of the Medina Gasette
http://medinagazette.northcoastnow.com/2010/06/09/teacher-faces-sex-charges/


You may wish to take particular note of the comments of readers, who are fully in support of this accused innocent teacher.


Sadly, I am reminded of another innocent Medina County teacher who was indicted, punished, and driven to suicide by HOLMAN.


Readers may refresh by going to a blog segment entitled " A HOLMANIZED CITIZEN DRIVEN TO SUICIDE,"  found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/holmanized-citizen-driven-to-suicide.html

Perhaps HOLMAN HAS A FREUDIAN HATRED FOR TEACHERS AFTER FLUNKING KINDERGARTEN!


OR THEN AGAIN, HOLMAN RESENTS TEACHERS WHO ARE ENTRUSTED WITH THE OBLIGATION OF INSTRUCTING CHILDREN ABOUT THE PROTECTIONS WHICH THEY SHOULD BE AFFORDED BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, BUT ARE DENIED THEM IN MEDINA COUNTY.


HOLMAN AND COLLIER JUST HATE A KNOWLEDGEABLE AND INFORMED CITIZENRY!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

XMAS DAY AT THE MEDINA COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION

It's XMAS DAY at the Medina Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station.

For most citizens of Medina County, this is the day that we celebrate Christmas and the birth of the Savior.


However, prosecutors and judges at the Medina County Courthouse and Railroad Station, who have universally sworn off western Christian traditions, today is simply XMAS to them.  They have adopted Muslim Sharia Law and have apparently pledged fidelity to Islam.


However, these Muslim devotees have grudgingly given in to the western civilization habit of gift-giving.

XMAS came early this year for TOTALLY CORRUPT MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER.  IN NOVEMBER, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DEAN HOLMAN GIFTED COLLIER WITH ANOTHER UNOPPOSED SIX-YEAR TERM ON THE BENCH.


COLLIER, NOT TO BE OUTDONE, HAS PLEDGED THIS XMAS TO GIVE HOLMAN A 100% RATE OF CONVICTION IN 2011, NO MATTER HOW MUCH EVIDENCE HE HAS TO HIDE, OR LAWS HE HAS TO VIOLATE IN DOING SO.


YES, COLLIER HAS GIVEN THE GIFT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING - HIS COMPLETE AND TOTAL SUBSERVIENCE TO HOLMAN FOR ANOTHER SIX YEARS.


To the readers of this blog (except for the corrupt Medina political hacks who read it daily), I wish a blessed and happy holiday season.

My fervent prayer for all of you that, by next Christmas, all of your unlawfully convicted and illegally imprisoned family members, due to the criminal conduct of the corrupt prosecutors and judges of the Medina County system of injustice, will be reunited with you.

It is also my prayer that, by next Christmas, the CRIMINALS WHO POSE AS JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN MEDINA COUNTY WILL HAVE ALREADY BEEN INDICTED BY THE FEDERAL GRAND JURY AND WILL BE PREPARING TO DEFEND THEMSELVES (as if that's possible) IN U.S. DISTRICT COURT.


MERRY CHRISTMAS!


MUCH MORE TO COME  ....

A LESSON FOR MEDINA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS!

One For The Parma Police (Parma)

---

Date: 2010-12-22, 11:47AM EST

---

One bad cop down, Dave Mr. "Serve Abuse" Ferrante finds himself on the other side of the law. Former Parma Detective who "resigned" or in other words had no choice was arrested yesterday for lying on his preliminary testing to become a cop about his colored blindness. A little weak but Ill take it none the less. For those of you who really know the true story about his piece of garbage, the story runs deeper than the media reported. This guy needed booted out long time ago with the lives he tried to destroy and did destroy. I sure hope the ones who covered up for him over many years are next. Including one particular Parma prosecutor who new he was a liability long time ago and did nothing to fix the problem when he had the opportunity. That elderly couple who was tragically killed by his negligence may have still been alive today. He lied and cheated on his police application and he lied about the night that couple was killed. He is a compulsive liar.

All that aside, its about time the Parma police department started cleaning house, Im sure there will be more to come, and for those Parma police who feel the need to follow in his footseps, let this be a lesson. The majority of police on Parma's force are good decent guys. I know several. They do a good job in the community and work hard. I honestly have not voted for police tax hikes in past years due to reasons like this moron. If those leaders continue cleaning house I may actually start voting for tax hikes such as police and schools which are an entirely different story. Guys like Ferrante along with a select few like him are the reason the Parma police get a bad rap. 

THIS POST FROM CRAIG'S LIST TELLS A COMPELLING STORY AND THE WAY THAT HONEST PUBLIC OFFICIALS DEAL WITH CORRUPTION.

If prosecutors and judges in Medina County were arrested for LYING, they'd all be in jail right now and the world would be a better place for it.

DO YOU THINK THAT THE MEDINA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS UNDERSTAND THE MESSAGE?  I DOUBT IT!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

HOLMAN, COLLIER TO BE KNIGHTED AT KLAN BAKE!

As most folks know, the Queen of England occasionally bestows knighthood on distinguished British citizens.  Elton John and Paul McCartney are but two examples.

The Medina County Commissioners are about to bestow a similar honor upon CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DINO HOLMAN and TOTALLY CORRUPT JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER a/k/a CLAVECCHIO a/k/a CALAFATO, although on not so quite grand a scale.

Many readers are likely unaware that, in recent times, Medina County had been the seat of the Ohio Chapter of the KU KLUX KLAN! 


In fact, the Imperial Wizard of the Ohio Klan lived right here in Medina County, and may still.

The KLAN, which has certainly been a force in local politics for generations, has a legacy that lives on to the present day right here in backwoods Medina County.

Is it any wonder why "justice" in Medina County so closely resembles the 1950's "justice" found in Mississippi?

ON ACCOUNT OF THEIR UNFAILINGLY LOYAL PROMOTION OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THAT VENERABLE INSTITUTION, HOLMAN AND COLLIER WILL BE RECOGNIZED AS LOYAL KNIGHTS OF THE REALM OF MEDINA COUNTY AT THE NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, AND WILL BE AWARDED MEDALS OF HONOR, PICTURED BELOW!

THESE HONORS AND AWARDS ARE RICHLY DESERVED BY HOLMAN AND COLLIER!


I AM QUITE CERTAIN THAT HOLMAN AND COLLIER WILL CHERISH THESE HONORS AND WEAR THEIR MEDALS PROUDLY, AS THE BADGES OF HONOR THAT THEY TRULY ARE!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

A LITTLE MORE BACKWOODS JUSTICE FROM WADSWORTH MUNICIPAL COURT

I just came across an online article published by George Spudnutt's Medina Gazette, the official oracle of the Medina County Chamber of Commerce.

Here's the remarkable headline:

Man ‘banished’ from Wadsworth wants resentencing after making harrassing calls to city

Now, you can read the full "article" about this masterpiece of less than well-reasoned jurisprudence by Wadsworth Municipal Judge Stephen McIlvaine at this link:
http://medinagazette.northcoastnow.com/2010/08/05/man-banished-from-wadsworth-after-making-harrassing-calls-to-city-wants-resentencing/

UNBELIEVABLE, ISN'T IT?

First of all, this hardened convict, Jeff Aberegg, had the audacity to place telephone calls to the office of the city prosecutor (who is surely not the brightest bulb) and asks questions!

Then, to aggravate the situation, he called Shrock's office asking the same question on successive days, according to Shrock.

It seems to me that this hardened criminal had to call back on successive days, asking the same question, BECAUSE NOBODY AT SHROCK'S OFFICE COULD OR WOULD GIVE HIM A PROPER, STRAIGHT ANSWER!


Typical of the usual and customary Medina County habit of dispensing Mississippi backwoods justice, SHROCK charged him with a criminal offense rather than simply giving this man a clear and unambiguous answer to his question.


Of course, Mr. Aberegg was required to appear before that paragon of legal ignorance, "judge" Stephen McIlvaine.

You may wish to refresh about McIlvaine at an earlier post entitled, "Wadsworth Municipal Court, Where the Flawed Process Begins," found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/wadsworth-municipal-court-where-flawed.html


You may recall that McIlvaine, who boasts that he is on the faculty of the Ohio Supreme Court Judicial College purports to be an expert and teaches other newby judges on the subject of Initial Appearances, in spite of the fact that he is apparently unaware of Rule 3 of the Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, both of which require that a law enforcement officer set out a statement of essential facts in a criminal complaint when applying for an arrest warrant.  McIlvaine, of course, does not enforce this requirement, probably because he is too busy preparing his lesson plans for newby judges.


In any event, Mr. Aberegg was apparently found guilty in one of those infamous Medina County constitutionally defective "trials."


Nevertheless, and here's the real story, McIlvaine banished Mr. Aberegg from the city limits of Wadsworth!


IT KIND OF REMINDS YOU OF THE LAWLESS OLD WEST.  "GET OUT OF TOWN, AND DON'T COME BACK!"


SUCH IS THE STATE OF BACKWOODS JUSTICE IN MEDINA COUNTY!  IN FACT, IT'S VERY SIMILAR TO THE STATEMENTS OF ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR SKIPPY SLEAZEBURY, "IF YOU DON'T LIKE MEDINA, LEAVE."


SOMEHOW, I THINK THE FOUNDING FATHERS WOULD FROWN UPON THE ATTITUDES OF THE CORRUPT POLITICAL HACKS WHO REIGN OVER THE MEDINA COUNTY INJUSTICE SYSTEM!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

HOLMAN WILL REALLY BE HIDING THE EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE!

FIRST THING, CHECK OUT THIS ARTICLE ONLINE AT GEORGE SPUDNUTT'S MEDINA GAZETTE: http://medinagazette.northcoastnow.com/2010/12/09/a-medina-county-judge-might-face-1st-death-penalty-sentence-in-decades/

You can bet that HOLMAN and crew will be hiding evidence from this defendant in a death penalty case.

The only thing that the defense attorney will "discover" is that HOLMAN's office will provide none!

One thing is certain.  Whether this defendant is innocent or guilty, HOLMAN WILL MAKE SURE HE WILL BE DENIED A FAIR TRIAL.


AFTER ALL, HOLMAN HAS TO PRESERVE THAT TAINTED 98% CONVICTION RATE! HOLMAN'S PHILOSOPHY IS "JUSTICE BE DAMNED! LET'S GIVE HIM A "FAIR TRIAL" AND THEN WE'LL HANG HIM!"


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

KREMLIN TAKES NOTE OF DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY IN MEDINA COUNTY!

One of the features of this blog, as well as others, is the availability of statistical data, including the countries of origin of "hits" on the blog.

Interestingly, there have been a significant number of "hits" at this blog originating from Russia!


One can only wonder why a totalitarian government, posing as a democracy, would be interested in the crime and corruption in the Medina County courts.

The only logical conclusion is that the Russians, who have a history of putting on "show trials," are looking to perfect the manner in which citizens can be deprived of their human rights under the pretense of fair trials.


What better place to look for inspiration than Medina County, Ohio, USA, where tyranny reigns to the present  day and innocent citizens are daily HOLMANIZED through unlawful convictions by hiding evidence favorable to a defendant and by intentionally errant rulings by an arrogant and corrupt judge.


IT IS OBVIOUS THAT HOLMAN AND COLLIER HAVE MUCH TO TEACH THE KREMLIN ABOUT DENYING CITIZENS THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

THE COLLIER PHILOSOPHY: "ALL THOSE PESKY RULES ARE MADE TO BE BROKEN, SO I CAN KEEP MY UNCONTESTED SEAT ON THE BENCH!"

Over the generations of American jurisprudence, the Supreme Court has developed a series of rules by which trials and other judicial proceedings are to be conducted.

These rules have been formulated in order to assure that a trial is conducted fairly.  As I am sure you can imagine by now, those rules have gone out the same window through which COLLIER gazes as the defense attorney is questioning witnesses at trial, since fairness is not part of the program in the Medina County courts.


Interestingly, COLLIER has repeatedly had convenient lapses of memory.  He seems to recall the rules when he wishes to prejudice a defendant, but he suddenly seems to forget all about them as the prosecutor continually strides way over the permissible line.

I suppose one would call that a double standard, although it clearly does not bother COLLIER one little bit. It's just one of the many ways he keeps his uncontested seat on the bench in Medina County, compliments of Dem Prosecutor HOLMAN.


Specifically, there are Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure and Ohio Rules of Evidence.  COLLIER disregards both as he daily represents the interests of the county prosecutor in his courtroom.

In fact, county prosecutor DINO HOLMAN has one more assistant in the courtroom, none other than COLLIER himself.  I wonder whether COLLIER is drawing two salaries.


The Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure can be found at http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/LegalResources/Rules/criminal/CriminalProcedure.pdf

The Ohio Rules of Evidence can be found at http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/LegalResources/Rules/evidence/evidence.pdf

You may very well find these references to really come in handy, if and when you follow along, as I point out just how badly COLLIER fails to abide by the Rules, in what can be properly termed malfeasance in office.


Malfeasance, in a county with an honest county prosecutor, is grounds for removal from public office.  According to the Ohio Revised Code, such an action would have to be brought by the county prosecutor.  In Medina County, that will never happen because COLLIER is really no more that a puppet for HOLMAN.


Any such action would be the equivalent of HOLMAN prosecuting his own daughter for felony drug abuse and DUI violations.  You can be sure that's  out of the question.

As already presented at this blog, the Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3, describes a criminal complaint as a "written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged."

In other words, Rule 3 requires an officer to set forth the facts (who did what), when filing a criminal complaint with a court.  The criminal complaint forms the basis for the issuance of an arrest warrant.

As has already been shown, you will NOT find one criminal complaint filed in the Medina County courts setting out a statement of essential facts as required, not only by Rule 3, but by the United States Constitution, Amendment 4, which provides, in part, "...no Warrant shall issue but upon probable cause (set out as a statement of essential facts in a criminal complaint) supported by oath or affirmation."

You have also been shown, earlier in this blog, how COLLIER simply brushes aside this constitutional violation, as if of no consequence.


You may wish to follow this link to see just how COLLIER brushes aside these Rules:
http://www.lexisone.com/lx1/caselaw/freecaselaw?action=OCLGetCaseDetail&format=FULL&sourceID=jcff&searchTerm=eUHC.Ieea.UYGW.ZcLE&searchFlag=y&l1loc=FCLOW

If you have read the above case, you will have found that it took FOUR YEARS and an ORDER FROM THE OHIO SUPREME COURT FOR COLLIER TO DO THE RIGHT THING!


Apparently HOLMAN didn't like Culgan.

This just the beginning, and you will be simply amazed at all of the rules that COLLIER violates in pursuit the agenda of the county prosecutor, and in the interest of preserving his own uncontested seat on the bench. As the blog progresses, the reader will be further exposed to COLLIER'S CORRUPT PRACTICES, in violation of the law.

THE REALITY IS THAT CORRUPT JUDGE COLLIER IS NOTHING MORE THAN A COMMON CRIMINAL IN BLACK ROBES!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

COLLIER: A PERFECT EXAMPLE HOW NOT TO DO THE LAW!

As this blog progresses, I intend to point out the Rules of Evidence and the Rules of Criminal Procedure and, where appropriate, point to U.S. Supreme Court cases, all of which corrupt judge CHRIS COLLIER has, at one time or another, violated so as to please his handler, corrupt Medina County prosecutor DINO HOLMAN.


Violations of these Rules by COLLIER carry various degrees of intended prejudice to the defendant .  Violations of certain of these Rules are, in and of themselves, violations of the U.S. Constitution and constitute reversible error, meaning that the court of appeals is compelled to overturn any conviction arising from such a violation.

In the aggregate however, the cumulative effect of violating the Rules is likely to have the effect of denying the defendant a fair trial, which is exactly what COLLIER intends whenever he ascend to his throne in the courtroom.

It has certainly occurred to me that there may be some law students who regularly read this blog.  For those young persons who aspire to become lawyers, and perhaps real judges, you will find here precisely what NOT TO DO when practicing the law as I point to COLLIER's practices and rulings.


The first rule of thumb, which COLLIER has clearly forgotten, is that the United States Constitution has value and should be the guiding principle in the practice of the law.

The second rule of thumb, which COLLIER routinely ignores, is that decisions by the United States Court are effectively the law of the land.  That's why the Founding Fathers made provisions for that esteemed institution, in the first place.

The third rule of thumb, which COLLIER rejects, is that a person accused of a criminal offense is, by law, presumed to be innocent until and unless proven otherwise in a fair trial (not to be found in COLLIER's room) conducted according to the Rules of Evidence and the Rules of Criminal Procedure, and governed by the body of appellate decisions (all of which are routinely ignored by COLLIER).


I've often wondered about the origins of the the term "kangaroo court."  However, after seeing COLLIER in action, the concept of "kangaroo court" came into focus quite clearly.  After seeing COLLIER and SLEAZEBURY jump to conclusions, and steering the jury to do the same, without the benefit of the facts, the Rules, and the law, I now fully understand.


IF YOU FOLLOW THIS LINK, YOU WILL FIND INFORMATION ON AN INDIVIDUAL, WITH THE REQUISITE DEGREE OF INTEGRITY, WHO WOULD BE MORE THAN A SUITABLE REPLACEMENT FOR COLLIER:  http://www.frontiernet.net/~dancase/Marcojudge.htm


A  group of law students would do well to attend a COLLIER trial so as to recognize all the pitfalls when practicing the law in an unfair forum with a sleazy, unethical prosecutor and a corrupt judge!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

A PRIMER FOR MEDINA COUNTY JURORS

Given the fact that we've had more than 4,600 "hits" at this blog, it seems reasonable to assume that many readers are Medina County voters who regularly vote in the rigged Medina County elections.

If you have voted, you are eligible to be selected for jury duty in what is supposed to be a random draw.  There is some suspicions that juries may be salted with individuals, chosen more for their association with these corrupt political hacks, and not chosen at random.  That, however, is a matter for another day.

If you are called to jury duty in the courtroom of corrupt judge CHRIS COLLIER, then you should be aware that the defendant is likely going to be HOLMANIZED.

Presented here are some of the things you should look for during the trial that the defendant, who is very likely not guilty of anything, is being HOLMANIZED by corrupt judge COLLIER and corrupt assistant prosecutor SCOTTY SLEAZEBURY.


First, you should be aware that SLEAZEBURY is assigned exclusively to prosecute innocent citizens in COLLIER's courtroom.

SLEAZEBURY is a rather tall fellow, walks with a swish, and has a really loud mouth.  He really knows very little about the law and never writes briefs, often taking a position not supported by case law.  That fact, by the way, is the first clue that COLLIER is in HOLMAN's pocket.  If the prosecutor fails to argue the law in a brief, you can be assured he is confident that COLLIER will rule in his favor without due regard for the current state of the law.


If, while on jury duty, you observe that COLLIER permits SLEAZEBURY to scream at defense witnesses, you can be sure the defendant is being HOLMANIZED.


If you observe that COLLIER permits SLEAZEBURY to argue with defense witnesses without end, the defendant is being HOLMANIZED.


If you notice that COLLIER permits SLEAZEBURY to misstate and mischaracterize the testimony of prior witnesses when questioning a witness, you can be confident that the defendant is being HOLMANIZED.


If you catch SLEAZEBURY lying to COLLIER and COLLIER just lets it slide, you can bet the defendant is being HOLMANIZED.


When you hear SLEAZEBURY claim that the defense attorney is "lying" and "misstating the law," you will know that it is SLEAZEBURY who is lying and misstating what little he knows of the law, and the defendant is being HOLMANIZED.


If you see that COLLIER stops the defense attorney from fully cross-examining the state's witnesses, the defendant is being HOLMANIZED.


If you fail to hear SLEAZEBURY cite to any case authority in support of his lame arguments, the defendant is being HOLMANIZED.


When you observe that COLLIER overruling all of the defense attorney's objections, you can be sure the defendant is being HOLMANIZED.


If during side bar conferences, which are intended to be conducted outside the hearing of the jury, COLLIER and SLEAZEBURY raise their voices so you, the juror, can hear every word, you can be sure the defendant is being HOLMANIZED.


If you observe COLLIER kissing the backsides of the State's witnesses, particularly law enforcement officers, then you can be sure the defendant is being HOLMANIZED.


If you see COLLIER treating defense witnesses abruptly and glaring at them, the defendant is being HOLMANIZED,


If, during cross-examination of the State's witnesses by the defense attorney, you see COLLIER acting bored, placing his chin in his hand, rolling his eyes, staring up at the ceiling, looking out the windows, and placing his head down on the bench as if napping, there is absolutely no doubt that the defendant is being HOLMANIZED.


If you see COLLIER acting the same way during direct examination of defense witnesses by the defense attorney, no doubt the defendant is being HOLMANIZED.


If you see COLLIER breeze through the jury instructions, as if he's a thespian, the defendant is being HOLMANIZED.


When COLLIER fails to instruct you, the jury, that you can find the defendant guilty of a lesser-included offense (a lower degree of the indicted offense) you will know that the defendant is being HOLMANIZED.


If, while in the jury room, you can hear SLEAZEBURY and/or COLLIER making remarks about the case from the hallway adjacent to the jury room and trying to influence your collective decision, there is absolutely no doubt that the defendant is being HOLMANIZED.


This list is not exhaustive, but it will give you some idea of what to look for as SLEAZEBURY and COLLIER will be doing their level best to HOLMANIZE the defendant and railroad the defendant to the penitentiary!


Then, when you retire to the jury room to deliberate, I hope you stop to ponder all of these things and come to realize you have just witnessed corrupt judge COLLIER HOLMANIZE the Constitution of the United States and the Rule of Law.


Of course, you can always catch COLLIER's act on his cable TV show, otherwise known as Chris' Romper Room


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

AN ALTERNATIVE THEORY UPON WHICH TO PROSECUTE CORRUPT PUBLIC OFFICIALS

One theory of prosecuting these corrupt public officials, under the RICO Statutes, was presented here yesterday.  Here is yet another theory upon which Federal prosecutors may approach the grime and corruption in the Medina County court system, which includes the prosecutor's office.

Federal prosecutors may very well choose to prosecute COLLIER, HOLMAN, and others, in Federal Court for Honest Services Fraud.

Title 18, Section 1346 of the United States Code provides:

§ 1346. Definition of “scheme or artifice to defraud”

For the purposes of this chapter, the term “scheme or artifice to defraud” includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.

You can find the statute at http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00001346----000-.html

The importance of this addition to this chapter of Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which largely embraces most of the Federal criminal statutes, is that various of the fraud statutes found in the chapter refer to various fraud offenses in the manner of "scheme or artifice to defraud."

The Congress, in 1988, added Section 1346, which embraces the concept of the deprivation of "honest services," such as the right to receive a fair trial.

Although the U.S. Supreme Court has limited the the breadth of the statute in a ruling, the statute still remains in full force and effect.

You can find a thumbnail sketch of this law at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honest_services_fraud 

The bottom line is that we, as citizens, have been deprived of the HONEST SERVICES of the corrupt Medina County prosecutor DEAN HOLMAN and CORRUPT JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, both of whom have and continue to conspire to deprive individuals of their constitutional rights, including the right to a fair trial.

THIS IS JUST ONE MORE THEORY UPON WHICH THE FEDERAL PROSECUTION OF THESE CORRUPT PUBLIC OFFICIALS MAY BE RESTED!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

THE MEDINA COURT SYSTEM: A RACKETEER INFLUENCED CORRUPT ORGANIZATION

That description fits perfectly when you apply Federal Law to the grime and corruption at the Medina County courthouse.  So, it seems only appropriate to examine the law, a mental exercise not regularly undertaken by judges and prosecutors in the Medina County court system.

Certain corrupt activities are prohibited by the Federal RICO statutes (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) codified at Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 1961 and following.

Essentially, the Federal law prohibits an association in-fact of persons who engage in a pattern of racketeering activity, defined at Title 18 U.S. Code Section 1961, to include the offense of Bribery, chargeable under the laws of the State of Ohio, and punishable by imprisonment for more than one year (a felony offense).

Title 18 U.S. Code Section 1962 sets out the actual proscribed conduct.  You can read these Federal statutes by following this link: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00001962----000-.html.

Under the laws of the State of Ohio, BRIBERY can be found at Section 2921.02 of the Ohio Revised Code.  You can read the statue by following this link: http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2921

Let me set out for you a properly framed charge which might hypothetically be charged by the United States Department of Justice in an indictment presented to a Federal Grand Jury:

During the period November 1, 2004 and continuing to the present date, and on prior dates, at Medina, Medina County, Ohio, in the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, a judge of the Medina County, Ohio Court of Common Pleas, DEAN HOLMAN, the elected prosecutor of Medina County, Ohio, and SCOTT SALISBURY, an assistant Medina County Prosecutor, and others known to the Grand Jury, did unlawfully receive income, directly and indirectly, derived from a pattern of racketeering, as defined in Title 18, Section 1961 of the United States Code,  by engaging in a pattern of unlawful conduct chargeable under the laws of the State of Ohio and punishable by imprisonment for more than one year, to wit: Bribery, in violation of  Sections 2921.02(A) and 2921.02(B) of the Ohio Revised Code, felonies of the third degree punishable by imprisonment from one to five  years; all in violation of Title 18, Sections 1962 and 2, United States Code.

Of course, you might now be questioning as to how COLLIER, HOLMAN, SALISBURY, and others might have violated the Bribery statute, in violation of Section 2921.02 of the Ohio Revised Code. Let me now present for you hypothetical charges that might be brought in a court in the State of Ohio.

During the period November 1, 2004 and the present date, and on prior dates, DEAN HOLMAN, an elected public official of Medina County, Ohio, with purpose to corrupt CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, a judge of the Common Pleas Court of Medina County, Ohio, and to improperly  influence Collier with respect to the discharge of his duty, before and after COLLIER was elected and sworn as a judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Medina County, Ohio, did offer and give to COLLIER a thing of value and valuable benefit, to wit:  continued compensation and benefits from the State of Ohio for employment as  judge of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas by causing COLLIER to be elected to the position of judge of the Court of Common Pleas in General Elections occurring in elections in November 2004 and again in 2010 without opposition from a Democratic opponent in such General Elections, in exchange for rulings, findings, orders and conduct, all contrary to law, in criminal cases, performed at the behest and in favor of HOLMAN, in violation of §2921.02(A), Ohio Revised Code.

Yet, another hypothetical criminal charge:

During the period November 1, 2004 and the present date, and on prior dates, CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, both before and after he was elected and sworn as a judge of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas did knowingly solicit and accept a valuable thing and valuable benefit, to wit: continued compensation and benefits from the State of Ohio received in his continued employment as judge of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas by facing uncontested election in the General Election of 2010; in exchange for such consideration and thing of value, COLLIER agreed to corrupt himself in the discharge of his sworn official duty by issuing rulings, findings, and orders, and exhibiting conduct, all contrary to law, to the intended to benefit DEAN HOLMAN, the elected county prosecutor of Medina County, Ohio, in violation of §2921.02(B), Ohio Revised Code.


That, of course, is how criminally charged conduct is properly framed!  You'll never see something this competent coming out of the Medina County Prosecutor's Office!  Although, you may very well see such language in a Federal indictment in the future.


PLEASE REMEMBER THAT A FEDERAL PROSECUTOR CAN CHARGE AS MANY COUNTS AS ARE JUSTIFIED BY THE EVIDENCE (UNLIKE MEDINA COUNTY WHERE EVIDENCE PLAYS NO PART IN THE CONVICTIONS OF INNOCENT CITIZENS).  IN FACT, A FEDERAL PROSECUTOR CAN JUST AS WELL CHARGE TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE AS A PREDICATE OFFENSE, AS WELL!

This, of course, is but one theory of a potential criminal prosecution in U.S. District Court!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

"EQUALER PROTECTION" UNDER THE LAW IN MEDINA COUNTY!

Just to refresh regular readers of this blog, I draw your attention to an excerpt form a book entitled Who Killed.... ? Cleveland by Jack Swint.

The excerpt can be found at http://books.google.com/books?id=hyv-hhjmSMQC&pg=PA91&lpg=PA91&dq=medina+ohio+corruption&source=bl&ots=heTRoyK02W&sig=iRCuqC7JSLpxwmHBwpIqd0HGnpA&hl=en&ei=cQnLTI_-N4H7lwffi5H4AQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAzgU#v=onepage&q=medina%20ohio%20corruption&f=false

You may recall that Mr. Swint details the apprehension of Medina County Commissioner Mark Whitfield attempting to burglarize the home of a woman in Medina County.  Commissioner Whitfield, a cross-dresser, was DRESSED IN DRAG when caught by Medina County Sheriff's Deputies in the act of committing the burglary.

Not surprisingly, no charges were brought against Commissioner Whitfield, who was apparently entitled to "EQUALER PROTECTION UNDER MEDINA COUNTY LAW!"

It would seem that Whitield, whose father was a Medina County judge, would have been heir-apparent to the seat on the Medina County bench now occupied by CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE COLLIER.


I suppose it just comes down to a matter of HOLMAN's tastes.

PERHAPS HOLMAN CHOSE NOT TO SEAT WHITFIELD ON THE BENCH SIMPLY BECAUSE HE DIDN'T CARE FOR THE MANNER IN WHICH WHITFIELD COORDINATED HIS EVENING GOWNS WITH HIS PATENT LEATHER PUMPS.

MUCH MORE TO COME ...