Quite simply, SALISBURY a/k/a SLEAZEBURY (for obvious reasons) and COLLIER play HIDE AND SEEK WITH EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO A DEFENDANT.
First, it is important to recognized that, in 1963, the United States Supreme Court decided Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S 83, which you can find referenced at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_v._Maryland
The primary holding is that the prosecutor has a legal obligation to turn over to the defense any evidence in his possession that is favorable to the defendant (exculpatory evidence).
Of course, it is the policy of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DEAN HOLMAN and his criminal assistants (aptly described) to conceal and hide such favorable evidence from a defendant.
Now to the game of HIDE AND SEEK!
After a defendant has been indicted and found worthy of punishment ACCORDING TO HOLMAN, the defense attorney customarily files a Motion for Discovery. The Motion for Discovery routinely requests production of any evidence favorable to the defendant.
As you might reasonably suspect, SLEAZEBURY refuses to turn over any such exculpatory evidence, since to do so would violate HOLMAN'S policy of concealing and withholding exculpatory evidence.
If the defense attorney is sufficiently tenacious and learns through independent investigation that the prosecutor does, indeed, hold such exculpatory evidence, the defense attorney files a Motion to Compel Discovery with COLLIER.
As you may further accurately suspect, COLLIER refuses to rule on the Motion to Compel Discovery and refuses to order SLEAZEBURY to turn over evidence favorable to the defendant.
So far, so good for SLEAZEBURY and COLLIER.
Now, just when they thought they've won that battle, an astute defense attorney will orally move COLLIER, on the record, to compel SLEAZEBURY to turn over the exculpatory evidence.
UH, OH! Now this issue is now becoming a problem!
So, COLLIER now orders SLEAZEBURY to turn over the exculpatory evidence directly to HIM, instead of the defense attorney.
SLEAZEBURY then hands off the exculpatory evidence to COLLIER, who then buries it and never provides the defense attorney access to evidence tending to prove that the defendant is not guilty of the charged offense.
"BRADY BE DAMNED!" says COLLIER, hell-bent on convicting another innocent defendant.
However, not surprisingly, this little game of HIDE AND SEEK with the exculpatory evidence is just ONE MORE CRIME BY SALISBURY AND COLLIER!
It is time to revisit TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE. Once again, for the sake of clarity:
2921.12 Tampering with evidence.
(A) No person, knowing that an official proceeding or investigation is in progress, or is about to be or likely to be instituted, shall do any of the following:
(1) Alter, destroy, conceal, or remove any record, document, or thing, with purpose to impair its value or availability as evidence in such proceeding or investigation;
(2) Make, present, or use any record, document, or thing, knowing it to be false and with purpose to mislead a public official who is or may be engaged in such proceeding or investigation, or with purpose to corrupt the outcome of any such proceeding or investigation.
(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of tampering with evidence, a felony of the third degree.
Effective Date: 01-01-1974
HOW ABOUT THAT?? ANOTHER FELONY CRIME!! IT'S JUST ANOTHER TYPICAL DAY IN THE COURTROOM FOR TOTALLY CORRUPT JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER AND HIS CORRUPT SIDEKICK, ASSISTANT COUNTY PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY!
THAT'S HOW COLLIER DOES IT HERE IN MEDINA COUNTY!
MUCH MORE TO COME ...
No comments:
Post a Comment