SALISBURY, A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, LIES OPENLY ON THE TRIAL RECORD

Regular readers of this blog may recall a prior segment captioned, SALISBURY QUALIFIES FOR MEMBERSHIP IN THE LIARS CLUB, which is easily found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/02/salisbury-qualifies-for-membership-in.html


If you either recalled or refreshed your memory by reviewing SALISBURY QUALIFIES FOR MEMBERSHIP IN THE LIARS CLUB, you know that, prior to trial, SALISBURY, a pathological liar, conceded that the Defendant's prior record of one misdemeanor arrest was not admissible at trial.


Then, through his first witness, introduced that inadmissible with the complete blessing of TOTALLY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER.


Immediately prior to the outset of the trial, Defense Counsel discussed this very issue  with RACIST PATHOLOGICAL LIAR SALISBURY and COMPLETELY WORTHLESS AND TOTALLY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER.


PRESENTED HERE IS THE PRECISE DIALOGUE FROM THAT DISCUSSION, TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM THE TRIAL RECORD, PAGES 9 & 10, OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE MOTIONS IN LIMINE:


Defense Counsel:  Two prior orders in which my client requested discovery responses.  ... and then on Friday the prosecutor showed me another misdemeanor, which again, it's not a truth-or-veracity misdemeanor.  I don't know if he - it seems from our discussions he's not intending to introduce this even if the Defendant took the stand.


COLLIER:  Mr. Salisbury?


(NOW HERE COMES A MAJOR LIE)


SALISBURY:  Well, I'm definitely not introducing it in my case in chief.  Whether he takes the stand or not and it becomes relevant, you know, I don't know until he takes the stand.


(FOLLOWED BY ANOTHER MAJOR LIE)


Collier:  He's not going to use it in his case in chief, so don't worry about that.


AS THE READER MAY NOW SUSPECT, BOTH SALISBURY AND COLLIER LIED AND CONSPIRED TO TAG-TEAM THE DEFENDANT. COLLIER PERMITTED SALISBURY, A  PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, TO INTRODUCE THE LEGALLY FORBIDDEN EVIDENCE THROUGH HIS VERY FIRST WITNESS IN HIS CASE IN CHIEF.


AT THIS POINT, THE ONLY QUESTION TO REMAIN IS WHO IS THE BIGGER LIAR, SALISBURY OR COLLIER?


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

SALISBURY STILL CONFUSED, UNSURE HOW TO DENIGRATE BLOGGER!

Medina County assistant prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY a/k/a SKIPPY SLEAZEBURY (for obvious reasons) remains clueless.

SALISBURY, who is a graduate of the SHERLOCK HOME SCHOOL OF INVESTIGATION (not to be confused with Sherlock Holmes, the fabled detective), remains clueless.


SALISBURY remains puzzled and just cannot figure out how to best denigrate this blogger.

AS PROOF OF SALISBURY'S BEFUDDLEMENT, I INVITE THE READER TO REVIEW THE EMAIL MESSAGE THAT SALISBURY SENT TO THTE BLOG AT 5:27 AM ON THE MORNING OF SUNDAY, MARCH 27, 2011:

"are you a spic or a nigger?"

IN TRUTH, IT REALLY WOULDN'T MAKE MUCH OF A DIFFERENCE, SINCE THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE AND THE JUDGES OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS APPEAR TO BE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY DISCRIMINATORS, THAT IS UNLESS YOU HAVE THE RIGHT CONNECTIONS!

IN ALL, THEY ARE A RATHER PATHETIC LOT AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/RAILROAD STATION & MOSQUE!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

SALISBURY, ALTHOUGH A SLOW LEARNER, IS BEGINNING TO GET THE HANG OF BASIC SPELLING!

Readers may recall that Medina County assistant prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY a/k/a SKIPPY SLEAZEBURY (for obvious reasons) has sent a number of gratuitous emails to the blog with SERIOUS SPELLING ERRORS!


The reader is invited to review the post captioned, SALISBURY CONTINUES TO LIE, CLAIMS HE CAN SPELL!, easily found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/03/salisbury-continues-to-lie-claims-he.html

In that post you will note that a number of SALISBURY'S misspellings were pointed out, and correct spellings provided to him for his very personal future use.

Among his misspellings, SALISBURY misspelled the words "LETTICE" and "SPICK."


As pointed out in the cited previous post, any randomly selected Fifth Grader would likely be able to properly spell the word "LETTUCE." However, SALISBURY had no trouble spelling one of his most frequently used words, "NIGGER!"


Also pointed out in that post, the pejorative term "SPIC" is used by the uneducated to refer to individuals of Hispanic (not spelled with a "K") descent.


This very morning, SALISBURY, using his schizophrenic identity of ANGUS 666, sent the following email to the blog:

you fucking asshole, lowlife worthless piece of human waste ... get a fucking life spick, go back to Mexico and pick lettuce wetback!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

YOU WILL TAKE NOTE OF THE FACT THAT, AFTER STUDYING THIS BLOG, SALISBURY, AT LONG LAST, SEEMS TO HAVE MASTERED THE SKILL OF PROPERLY SPELLING THE WORD "LETTUCE!" 


Still, SALISBURY did not get it quite right, and continues to misspell the pejorative term "SPICK."


Yet, I note that SALISBURY, who is clearly unable to spell the most basic of words, looks down upon individuals of Mexican descent and obviously does not hold labor in high regard.  Perhaps that is because SALISBURY has never had to work for a living, up to and including the present moment.


It's difficult to be proud of your "public servants," like SALISBURY, when HE CAN'T EVEN SPELL!  That, of course, is overlooking his unethical and unlawful conduct in the course of his public "employment."


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

THE WORM TURNS AS SALISBURY PLEADS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS!

My, how the worm does truly turn.  Assistant Medina County prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY a/ka SKIPPY SLEAZEBURY (for obvious reasons) seeks the Constitutional protection that he, TOTALLY CORRUPT JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, and CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN have routinely denied to the citizens of Medina County.

SALISBURY has sent the following email to the blog:

"The prosecutor is innocent until proven guilty. Show him the same respect you believe he denied to the Defendant." 

IT IS MORE THAN INTERESTING THAT SALISBURY, KNOWING FULL WELL THAT HE WILL BE CONVICTED OF HIS MISDEEDS, SUDDENLY FINDS VALUE IN THE UNTIED STATES CONSTITUTION AND NOW CLAIMS PROTECTIONS THAT HE AND TOTALLY CORRUPT JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER DISREGARD DAILY! 


As to the matter of "respect," SALISBURY, who taunts chained and shackled defendants as well as helpless women, wishes to be granted the respect that he has shown to no one.

Respect must be earned and is not given gratuitously, but, rather, must be earned by a demonstration of reputable conduct.

SALISBURY, CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, and TOTALLY CORRUPT JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, who has earned a reputation in the community as a TERRIBLE "JUDGE," have each demonstrated by their words and actions that they are NOT WORTHY OF ANY RESPECT AT ALL. 


Further, SALISBURY IS NOT INNOCENT AND WILL ULTIMATELY BE PROVEN GUILTY IN U.S. DISTRICT COURT!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

SALISBURY CONTINUES TO LIE, CLAIMS HE CAN SPELL!

Regular readers of this blog will recall that, in the most recent prior post at this blog, the blogger posted a prior threat from Medina County assistant prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY a/k/a SKIPPY SLEAZEBURY (for obvious reasons)  to PLANT DRUGS IN THE AUTOMOBILE OF THE BLOGGER, reprinted here, once again:

"If that is true, he'll probably get pulled over somewhere and they'll magically find a bag of dope in his car. Personally I wouldn't fuck with what are really a couple of Lawyers that way since he could either end up in jail and possibly loose everything he owns. That is his choice." 

FURTHER, IN THAT SAME POST, THE BLOGGER  OBSERVED THE FOLLOWING:


'You may also note that SALISBURY is unable to properly spell the word "LOSE."  If a word contains more than four letters and one vowel, SALISBURY JUST CAN'T SPELL IT!  It's not that much of a surprise that SALISBURY never writes any legal briefs.  If he did, they would be unintelligible!'


Once again, SALISBURY assumed the schizophrenic identity of ANGUS 666. 


Regular readers may recall that SALISBURY has previously sent one of his juvenile email messages to the blog, using the schizophrenic identity of ANGUS 666. You may wish to review the post captioned, "WHAT, DO YOU SUPPOSE, IS THE MEANING OF 666?" which is easily found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/11/what-do-you-suppose-is-meaning-of-666.html


IN RESPONSE TO YESTERDAY'S POST, SALISBURY FIRED OFF A SERIES OF EMAIL MESSAGES TO THE BLOG, PUBLISHED HERE FOR YOUR READING PLEASURE.


First, SALISBURY fired off this little gem:

You still do not get it old man, do you? You are going to face a multimillion dollar lawsuit, and you will lose, and barring that every cop in northeast Ohio will know your name. 

Apparently SALISBURY is unaware that, among REAL LAW ENFORCEMENT PROFESSIONALS IN NORTHEAST OHIO, Medina County has developed a well-earned reputation for having a CORRUPT CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM!


Next, SALISBURY, feeling the compulsive need to add, sent this gem to the blog:

Look, I can spell complex words: You are an asshole geriatric fool who is going to keel over and die from the legal shitstorm the boys and I have cooked up. 

Now, it certainly seems that SALISBURY consulted the latest addition of SPELLING FOR DUMMIES, and made only one spelling error, which is a very significant improvement in his spelling performance.  Specifically, SALISBURY, in describing the "storm," has misspelled once again. For example, snow storm, wind storm, ice storm, tropical storm, etc.  You get the idea!

Then, obviously stewing in his own juices, with his uncontrollable anger intensifying, SALISBURY fired off this desperate message:

hey cunt go fuck yourself everyones laughing at you .... hardee fuckin harr harr asshattttttttttttt

It is obvious that SALISBURY expended significant brain power (for him) when he framed the above-message.  You will notice, however, TWO SIGNIFICANT MISSPELLINGS: "EVERYONES" (properly spelled " everyone's") and "HARDEE" (properly spelled "hardy")


DESPITE HIS EARLIER CLAIM THAT HE "CAN SPELL COMPLEX WORDS," IT IS PAINFULLY OBVIOUS THAT SALISBURY IS UNABLE TO SPELL SOME OF THE MOST COMMON WORDS IN DAILY USAGE IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE.


Obsessing even more, SALISBURY, unable to restrain himself, just had to fire off the following email at 2:20 AM:

no life ... post on craigs list and you will be heard by 20 people (Your relatives) why don’t you just call them trailer shit bag .. oh no phone  ..... glad Medina Fucked you over VIVA MEDINA!!!! 

Finally, after most certainly tossing and turning overnight in his uncontrollable anger, SALISBURY fired off this email message at 10:02 AM today, DURING HIS SCHEDULED "WORK" HOURS AND ON THE TAXPAYERS' DIME:

hey SPICK fuck your lettice picking ass eveybody's tired of your whiny bullshit go back to painting your ceramics and grt back to landscaping you fucking sand NIGGER

ONCE AGAIN, SALISBURY HAS MISSPELLED THE MOST BASIC OF WORDS IN DAILY USE.


At the outset, SALISBURY addressed the blogger in the manner, "HEY SPICK."  The pejorative term "Spic" (properly spelled) derives from the word "HISPANIC" (not spelled with a "K").


Next, we look to SALISBSURY'S spelling in his form of the word "LETTICE."  I'm fairly confident that SALISBURY is not quite sharp enough to qualify as a contestant on that TV game show, "ARE YOU SMARTER THAT A FIFTH GRADER."


There is little doubt that any 5th Grader, randomly chosen, could easily spell the word "LETTUCE" (properly spelled).


Next, we look to SALISBURY'S spelling of the word "WHINY."   Once again, any randomly chosen 5th Grader is likely able to properly spell the word "WHINEY."


While SALISBURY uses the word "GRT," there is no such word included in the dictionary.  Perhaps, SALISBURY simply misspelled one of the most common and simple verbs in usage, the word "GET" (properly spelled).


SALISBURY, HOWEVER, WAS ABLE TO PROPERLY SPELL THE WORD "NIGGER," LIKELY BECAUSE HE USES THAT PARTICULAR PEJORATIVE TERM SO FREQUENTLY.


I recall an incident, some years ago, when a MEDINA PATROLMAN WAS FIRED FOR THE USE OF THAT PARTICULAR TERM.


SALISBURY'S USE OF SUCH PEJORATIVE TERMS IS OBVIOUSLY OF NO CONCERN TO CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, WHO MUST CERTAINLY APPROVE.  THE FACT IS THAT THIS IS THE MANNER IN WHICH HOLMAN AND SALISBURY VIEW THE CITIZENRY OF MEDINA COUNTY.


However, SALISBURY attempts to justify his unlawful and unethical conduct in the following email message to the blog:

Stop complaining about how hard it is to escape conviction. If we must keep order among the racial minorities and bikers like the two Hells Angels that we busted, occasionaly the innocent must be convicted. But we must maintain order, we cannot have chaos in our county. 

SOMEHOW THE FOUNDING FATHERS NEVER CONTEMPLATED THAT "OCCASIONALLY THE INNOCENT MUST BE CONVICTED" TO AVOID "CHAOS!"


THIS IS PRECISELY WHY TOTALLY CORRUPT JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER FAILS TO ENFORCE THE RULES OF EVIDENCE AND THE LAW OF THE LAND IN HIS COURTROOM!


WHAT IS SALISBURY SMOKING?  DOES HE FEAR THAT MEXICANS, PUERTO-RICANS, AND AFRICAN-AMERICANS ARE GOING TO BAND TOGETHER AND STAMPEDE A HERD OF DAIRY COWS ON PUBLIC SQUARE?


THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES WAS ESTABLISHED TO PREVENT THE VERY PRACTICES OF THE MEDINA COUNTY JUSTICE SYSTEM, WHICH THESE LESS-THEN-HONORABLE POLITICIANS HAVE IGNORED TO THE DETRIMENT OF EVERY CITIZEN.


WHAT A SHAME THAT WE ARE COMPELLED, AS TAXPAYERS, TO PAY THE SALARIES OF SUCH IMMORAL INDIVIDUALS!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

SALISBURY IMPLICATES COLLIER, HOLMAN IN CONSPIRACY TO PLANT DRUGS AND FRAME INNOCENT BLOGGER

In the prior post at this blog, the threats of assistant Medina County prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY, detailing his plans to PLANT DRUGS IN THE AUTOMOBILE OF THIS BLOGGER were detailed.

SALISBURY'S threats are published again, in this post:

"If that is true, he'll probably get pulled over somewhere and they'll magically find a bag of dope in his car. Personally I wouldn't fuck with what are really a couple of Lawyers that way since he could either end up in jail and possibly loose everything he owns. That is his choice." 



IT IS READILY APPARENT, FROM HIS ARROGANCE, SALISBURY, LIKE TOTALLY CORRUPT MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER AND CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, CONSIDERS HIMSELF TO BE ABOVE THE LAW.  HE MISTAKENLY BELIEVES THAT HE CAN USE THE LAW, LIKE HE, COLLIER, AND HOLMAN HAVE DONE IN THE PAST, AS A PERSONAL WEAPON TO PURSUE HIS VENDETTA AGAINST THE BLOGGER, WHO HAS DONE NO MORE THAN DISCLOSE THE FACTS AND REVEAL THE TRUTH OF THE RAMPANT CORRUPTION ENDEMIC IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS!


You may also note that SALISBURY is unable to properly spell the word "LOSE."  If a word contains more than four letters and one vowel, SALISBURY JUST CAN'T SPELL IT!  It's not that much of a surprise that SALISBURY never writes any legal briefs.  If he did, they would be unintelligible! 


YESTERDAY, SALISBURY SENT AN EMAIL MESSAGE TO THE BLOG, IMPLICATING COLLIER AND HOLMAN IN HIS SCHEME TO PLANT DRUGS IN THE AUTOMOBILE OF THE BLOGGER!


Referring to his prior message, which disclosed his threat to PLANT DRUGS, SALISBURY FOLLOWED UP WITH:

 We will do a lot worse than that. 

Blog: MEDINA CORRUPTION - ALL THE NEWS THAT'S FIT TO PRINT, BUT WASN'T UNTIL NOW!
Post: SALISBURY REACTS TO PUBLIC EXPOSURE OF FORMAL COMPLAINT TO OHIO SUPREME COURT; PLANS TO PLANT DRUGS IN AUTO OF BLOGGER
Link: http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/03/salisbury-reacts-to-public-exposure-of.html 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

 You will note that SALISBURY writes ' "WE" will do a lot worse than that'!

SALISBURY didn't write "I" but rather "WE."

It is perfectly clear that the "WE" refers to the other CORRUPT "PUBLIC OFFICIALS" identified in the blog, specifically TOTALLY CORRUPT MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLER and CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.

IT COMES AS NO SURPRISE THAT COLLIER AND HOLMAN HAVE JOINED INTO THE CONSPIRACY WITH SALISBURY TO BRING YET ANOTHER UNLAWFUL PROSECUTION OF ANOTHER INNOCENT CITIZEN IN MEDINA COUNTY. 

THEY'VE BEEN DOING THAT FOR MANY YEARS!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

SALISBURY REACTS TO PUBLIC EXPOSURE OF FORMAL COMPLAINT TO OHIO SUPREME COURT; PLANS TO PLANT DRUGS IN AUTO OF BLOGGER

Medina County assistant prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY a/k/a SKIPPY SLEAZEBURY has reacted in his usual and customary manner to the publication of the nuts and bolts of the FORMAL COMPLAINT TO THE OHIO SUPREME COURT FILED AGAINST TOTALLY CORRUPT JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, AND SALISBURY.


SALISBURY, who lacks the good sense that God gave a rock, just can't seem to restrain himself, despite explicit orders given to him by CORRUPT MEDINA PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN to refrain from making any further moronic remarks.

SALISBURY sent this message to this blogger:


"If that is true, he'll probably get pulled over somewhere and they'll magically find a bag of dope in his car. Personally I wouldn't fuck with what are really a couple of Lawyers that way since he could either end up in jail and possibly loose everything he owns. That is his choice." 


FIRSTLY, I WOULD NEVER PERMIT SALISBURY TO ENTER MY AUTOMOBILE, SO THAT'S ONE DOPE YOU'LL NEVER FIND IN MY CAR!


This does, however, point once again to the rampant corruption in the Medina County Prosecutor's Office.


SALISBURY OFFERS TO PLANT DRUGS IN MY CAR.  JUST ONE OF THE MANY WAYS THAT HE AND HOLMAN PRESERVE THEIR TARNISHED 98% RATE OF CONVICTION AT THE EXPENSE OF INNOCENT CITIZENS!


SALISBURY'S THREAT TO PLANT EVIDENCE, CONSISTENT WITH HIS PRIOR UNLAWFUL CONDUCT, DEMONSTRATES THE ABSOLUTE NEED FOR AN INDEPENDENT CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

THE PROOF IS IN THE PUDDING, AND THERE'S PLENTY OF PUDDING TO GO AROUND!

THE PROOF, THEY SAY, IS IN THE PUDDING!

Set out, below, are the exhibits offered to the Disciplinary Counsel of the Ohio Supreme Court in support of the Complaint of Judicial and Prosecutorial Misconduct of CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, DEAN HOLMAN, and SCOTT SALISBURY.

As one can easily see, there's plenty of pudding to be spread around between these three corrupt functionaries of the corrupt Medina County Courts.

Exhibit 1        Common Pleas Docket,

Exhibit 2            Newspaper article, dated October 8, 2008, published online by the Medina Gazette, in which Medina County Prosecutor Dean Holman touts the 98% conviction rate of his office.

Exhibit  3         Copy of the legally deficient indictment returned by the Medina County grand jury, charging Defendant with Aggravated Burglary, in violation of O.R.C §2911.11.

Exhibit  4         Photograph of County Rd., looking northbound, toward Flintstone residence, from parents' residence.

Exhibit  5         Photograph of firearms kept parents’ home, to which Defendant had access.

Exhibit  6         Photograph of ammunition kept in parents’ home, to which Defendant had access.

Exhibit  7          Photograph of the tree line concealing the Flintstone driveway, looking northbound on County Rd. on the approach to the Flintstone residence

Exhibit  8         Photograph of the Flintstone driveway and residence, looking westbound from County Rd.

Exhibit  9         Copy of the cell telephone billing record of Defendant’s wife, documenting receipt of telephone call from Homerville, Ohio cell tower at 6:03 pm.

Exhibit 10         Transcript of excerpts from the May 27, 2009 911 call in which the State’s key witness admitted that she never saw Defendant on May 27, 2009 and was unable to observe or hear events outside  the bedroom where she remained, admitted into evidence at the suppression hearing.

Exhibit 11         Timeline of events during the purported incident of May 27, 2009, constructed from the official reports of the Medina County Sheriff’s Office.

Exhibit 12         Copy of the constitutionally defective and unsworn criminal complaint, filed by Deputy Douglas Clinage with the Wadsworth Municipal Court, charging Defendant with Burglary; and lacking a statement of essential facts from which a neutral and detached judicial officer might otherwise find probable cause.

Exhibit 13         Copy of the constitutionally defective arrest warrant

Exhibit 14         Copy of Defendant’s Motion to Suppress

Exhibit 15         Copy of Defendant’s Supplement to the Motion to Suppress

Exhibit 16         Copy of the document falsified by the assistant prosecutor, which he turned over to the defense in discovery proceedings.

Exhibit 17         Copy of the narrative report of Deputy Frank Telatko

Exhibit 18         Copy of the pertinent portion of the narrative report of Deputy Douglas Clinage

Exhibit 19         Copy of Defendant’s Motion For An Order To Show Cause Why The Assistant Prosecutor Should Not Be Held In Contempt Of Court And Subject To Sanctions

Exhibit 20         Copy of Salisbury’s Notice of Underlying Crimes, none of which were considered by the Medina County grand jury.

Exhibit 21         Copy of Defendant’s Opposition to Prosecutors’ Alleged “Notice of Underlying Crimes”

Exhibit 22         Affidavits of Defense Investigator regarding the invasion of the defense camp by assistant prosecutor Salisbury, filed with the court.

Exhibit 23         Copy of the uncontested letter from Defense Counsel to assistant prosecutor Salisbury, dated November 11, 2009, memorializing her conversation with Salisbury wherein he conceded, prior to trial, that the alleged “other acts” evidence was inadmissible.  Salisbury reconfirmed his  agreement during the court’s discussion of the Motions in limine.

Exhibit 24         Motion to Quash with Affidavit of Defendant’s wife, filed with the court on July 27, 2009, asserting her spousal privilege.

Exhibit 25   Supplement to Motion to Quash with Affidavit of Defendant’s wife, filed with the court on September 11, 2009, again asserting her spousal privilege.

Exhibit 26         Copy of a personal letter sent by the Defendant’s wife to Salisbury, asserting her spousal privilege

Exhibit 27         Copy of Defendant’s proposed redactions to the 911 tape recording                 

Exhibit 28         Transcript of the relevant sworn testimony of Wilma Flintsone acquired during the trial wherein Wilma concedes that her trial testimony is inconsistent with her report to the 911 dispatcher on May 27, 2009, at which time she reported that she never saw Defendant.

Exhibit 29         Copy of the Victim Impact Statement submitted to the trial judge by homeowner Fred Flinstone advising the judge that Defendant did not commit the alleged “aggravated burglary” of Fred’s home.  (Fred had previously advised the sheriff’s deputies that Defendant committed no crime and that Fred was not pressing charges against his friend.  The prosecutor and the trial judge withheld this exculpatory evidence.)

Exhibit 30         Affidavit of trial Defense Counsel, attached to Defendant’s post-trial motions package.

Exhibit 31         Copy of the Medina County Sheriff’s evidence log, annotated by the evidence custodian to indicate specific items to be withheld from the defense per the instruction and order of Salisbury

Exhibit 32         Copy of the Defendant’s Motion for Acquittal; Motion for New Trial; Motion for Arrest of Judgment; Motion to Suspend Execution of Sentence; and Motion for Bail Pending Appeal

Exhibit 33         Copy of Defendant’s Additional Authorities and Exhibits in Support of the Defendant’s Motion for Acquittal; Motion for New Trial; Motion for Arrest of Judgment; Motion to Suspend Execution of Sentence; and Motion for Bail Pending Appeal

Exhibit 34         Affidavit of Defense Investigator concerning improper ex parte discussions between the trial judge and the assistant county prosecutor on December 18, 2009.

Exhibit 35           Affidavit of witness regarding subsequent admissions of Wilma Flintstone, the State’s only witness to incriminate Defendant, that Wilma had committed perjury at trial.

Exhibit 36         Copy of Defendant’s Post-Hearing Rebuttal Memorandum With Exhibits

Exhibit 37         Copy of a letter from Defense Counsel to Medina County Prosecutor Dean Holman, requesting a meeting to discuss the misconduct of Assistant County Prosecutor Scott Salisbury.

Exhibit 38         Copy of Salisbury’s post-hearing sham pleading, failing to cite any case authority.

Exhibit 39          Copy of Defendant’s Motion for Appointment of Appellate Counsel and for Transcripts

Exhibit 40         Copy of Judgment Entry re: Sentencing

Exhibit 41         Copy of Judgment Entry re: Appointment of Appellate Counsel

Exhibit 42         Defendant’s Combined Requests For Discovery, A Bill of Particulars, And Notice of State’s Intention To Use Specified Evidence

Exhibit 43         Defendant’s Motion To Compel Discovery; And Renewed Motion For A Bill Of Particulars

Exhibit 44         Message posted by Salisbury to Craigslist on November 16, 2010

Exhibit 45         Message posted by Salisbury to Craigslist on November 18, 2010

Exhibit 46           Stream of email messages from Salisbury, using the email address of “letitbe8691@aol.com,” and a reader and supporter of the blog, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com

Exhibit 47           Message posted by Salisbury to Craigslist on December 27, 2010

Exhibit 48           Extortionate email from Salisbury to the publisher of the blog, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com

Exhibit 49         Message posted by Salisbury to Craigslist on January 1, 2011, admitting that Brady “is almost impossible to enforce which is why the abuse is going on.”

Exhibit 50          Public Records Request to the Medina County Sheriff’s Office, dated February 17, 2010

Exhibit 51          Letter from the Medina County Sheriff’s Office, dated February 22, 2010, relating that the Public Records Request had been referred to Dean Holman

Exhibit 52         Letter from Dean Holman’s Office, denying my public records request for lack of clarity and particularity.

COLLIER, HOLMAN, and SALISBURY, it would seem, may very well have a difficult time lying their way out of this situation, given all the proof presented to the Ohio Supreme Court, as evidence above.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

OHIO SUPREME COURT TO PROBE COLLIER, HOLMAN, SALISBURY IN INVESTIGATION OF CORRUPTION IN MEDINA COUNTY COURTS

The Ohio Supreme Court will probe the Medina County Court of Common Pleas and the specific conduct of CORRUPT JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, and CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTORS DEAN HOLMAN and SCOTT SALISBURY.

The blog has received access to the COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL AND PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT filed by the father of the Defendant, whose case is currently being profiled at this blog. The father is a retired Federal Law Enforcement Officer with more than a passing knowledge of the law and the Rules of evidence (unlike COLLIER and SALISBURY).

THE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL AND PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, WITH EXHIBITS. IS AN ESTIMATED 350 PAGES IN LENGTH.

Given the length of the Complaint, it is impossible to publish here in its entirety.  So, as in prior posts, the blog will display the various headings and subheadings in the Complaint so that you, the reader, will get a sense of the MISCONDUCT OF COLLIER AND SALISBURY AT TRIAL OF THIS DEFENDANT.

FIRST, EXCERPTED FROM THE PROLOGUE TO THE COMPLAINT:

"There is no greater prima facie evidence that the assistant county prosecutor Salisbury has relied upon the trial judge to consistently rule in his favor, notwithstanding the facts and the law, than the fact that the assistant prosecutor failed to file a single brief in opposition to any of Defendant’s many meritorious motions. "

HERE, NOW,  ARE THE VARIOUS HEADINGS AND SUBHEADINGS FROM THE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL AND PROSECUTORIAL CONDUCT OF COLLIER, HOLMAN, AND SALISBURY:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.         THE INCIDENT

II.       THE UNLAWFUL ARREST

III.      THE FATALLY DEFECTIVE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND ARREST WARRANT

IV.         THE SUPPRESSION HEARING

1.          The Falsified Discovery Document

2.          The Defective Indictment

3.          Collier Refused to Review the Transcript of the Testimony of Deputy Douglas Clinage to Determine What Testimony, if Any, was Given by Clinage Before the Grand Jury as to The Defendant’s Conduct Giving Rise to the Unspecified “Criminal Offense” as Charged in the Indictment

4.          The Tape Recorded 911 Call

5.          Collier’s Calculated Untimely Rulings on Suppression Motions; Denial of The Right to a Speedy Trial

V.         THE PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE

1.         Salisbury Admitted to Invading the Defense Camp by Monitoring          Privileged Telephone Communications, which “Invalidates the trial at          which it occurred” according to the United States Supreme Court

2.         Salisbury Invaded the Defense Camp by Placing an Undercover Operative in the Medina County Jail to Gather Information from the Defendant, Who Was Represented By Legal Counsel

3.         Salisbury Sprung Inadmissible Evidence of Alleged “Other Acts” Upon the Defense on the Friday,  November 6, 2009, on the Very Eve of Trial

VI.      THE INTENTIONALLY BIASED, UNFAIR, AND FATALLY 

FLAWED TRIAL

1.       The Fatally Flawed Voire Dire                                                                   

2.       The Hearing on Motions in limine

3.       Collier Compelled the Defendant’s Wife to Testify Despite Her Assertion of Her Spousal Privilege, in violation of the provisions of §2945.42 O.R.C. 

4.       Collier Knowingly Permitted Salisbury to Introduce Forbidden Alleged “Other Acts” Evidence, Over Defense Objection, And Without Conducting a Balancing Test or Contemporaneous Limiting Instruction, All With Calculation and Design to Prejudice the Defendant

5.       Collier Permitted Salisbury to Play the Tape Recorded 911 Telephone Call Contrary to the Prevailing Case Law and Over Defense Objection

6.       Collier Refused to Order Salisbury to Redact the Prejudicial and Inflammatory Remarks of Kimberly Leighton From the Tape Recorded 911 Telephone Call Contrary to the Prevailing Case Law and Over Defense Objection

7.       Collier Permitted Salisbury to Introduce the Testimony of Kimberly Leighton, an Incompetent Witness, After Having Been Presented With Uncontroverted Evidence That Mrs. Leighton Did Not Observe the Events About Which She Offered Testimony, in Violation of Evid.R. 602

8.       Collier Repeatedly Permitted Salisbury to Question Witnesses About The Testimony of Other Witnesses and Further Permitted Salisbury to Mischaracterize Such Testimony of Prior Witnesses Under the Guise of Posing Questions, All Over Defense Objections

9.       Collier Intentionally Limited Defense Counsel’s Cross-Examination of the State’s Witnesses Roy and Kimberly Leighton With The Specific Intent to Prejudice the Defendant

10.     Collier, With the Specific Intent to Prejudice the Defendant, Intentionally Prevented Defense Counsel From Cross-Examining Deputy Frank Telatko Regarding Exculpatory Statements Made by the Defendant         

11.      Collier, With the Specific Intent to Prejudice the Defendant, Intentionally Prevented Defense Counsel From Cross-Examining Deputy Frank Telatko Regarding Statements Made by Roy Leighton to Sheriff’s Deputies at the Scene on May 27, 2009

12.      Collier Improperly Excluded the Defense Investigator From the Trial Proceedings, With the Intent to Impede the Effective Presentation of the Defense Case, in Violation of Evid. R. 615

13.      Collier Permitted the Prosecutor to Badger, Harass, Denigrate, and Scream at Defense Witnesses, Over Defense Objections, With the Specific Intention to Prejudice the Defendant

14.      Collier Personally Concealed and Withheld Evidence Favorable to the Defendant

15.      COLLIER Withheld and Concealed State’s Exculpatory Photographs from Defendant

16.      COLLIER Withheld and Concealed the Exculpatory Audio Tape of the Third Interview of Roy Leighton

17.      Collier Prevented Defense Counsel From Fully Developing the Defense Theory of the Case by Refusing to Permit the Defendant From Presenting Material Evidence to the Jury

18.     Collier Impermissibly Offered Personal Testimony at Trial When Denying the Defense the Opportunity to Introduce Verizon Cell Tower Evidence to the Jury

19.     Collier Made No Attempt to Compel Salisbury to Produce Deputy Douglas Clinage, the State’s Agent, Who Failed to Appear at Trial, Ignoring the Defense Subpoena to Appear Offer Testimony, in violation of the Compulsory Clause

20.      During Sidebar Conferences, Collier and Salisbury Spoke With Elevated Voices So As to Be Heard By the Jury, Thus Intentionally Prejudicing the Defendant

21.      Collier Refused To Instruct the Jury On The Lesser Included Offense of Criminal Trespass, Over Defense Objection, Disingenuously and Wrongly Holding, by Design, That Defendant Relied Solely On the Complete Defense of Privilege, All With the Specific Intention to Prejudice the Defendant

22.      Collier Permitted Salisbury to Repeatedly Denigrate Defense Counsel During the Suppression Hearing and at Trial

23.      Collier’s Personal Demeanor During the Trial Was Inappropriate and Was Specifically Calculated and Designed to Prejudice the Defendant

VII.     THE VERDICT

VIII.   THE POST-CONVICTION “HEARING”

1.         Ex Parte Communications Between Collier and Salisbury

2.        The “Hearing”

IX.      THE SENTENCING

X.        THE JUDMENT ENTRY RE: SENTENCING

XI.      THE PROPER RESOLUTION: APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, INVESTIGATION, REMOVAL FROM THE BENCH, PROSECUTION, LOCAL JUDICIAL REFORM

1.        Collier, a Republican, Sits on the Bench of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas at the Pleasure of the Democrat County Prosecutor and the Democrat Party

ADDENDUM

XII.     THE EVIDENCE VIEW

Not surprisingly, each and every of the items that Salisbury instructed the Evidence Custodian to withhold from the defense contained exculpatory evidence.

XIII.    SALISBURY TAUNTED THE DEFENDANT DURING PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS

XIV.     SALISBURY SUBORNED PERJURY

XV.       POST-CONVICTION THREATS AND A STUNNING ADMISSION FROM SALISBURY

XVI.     SALISBURY’S PLAINTIVE PLEA

XVII.   SALISBURY’S THREAT

XVIII.  SALISBURY ENGAGED IN EXCHANGES OF HARASSING EMAILS WITH BLOG SUPPORTERS

XIX.     SALISBURY THREATENS TO PUBLICLY DISCLOSE THE IDENTITY OF THE DEFENDANT’S MINOR CHILDREN

XX.       SALISBURY ATTEMPTED EXTORTION TO SILENCE THE BLOG

XXI.     A STUNNING ADMISSION FROM SALISBURY

“While I understand Brady v Maryland (1963) says they must do this, it is almost impossible to enforce which is why the abuse has been going on.”

XXII.    HOLMAN WAS TWICE PRESENT IN COURT TO ASSURE THAT COLLIER DID NOT FAIL TO BEND TO HIS WILL

XXIII.  HOLMAN HAS STONEWALLED ATTEMPTS TO BY THE DEFENSE TO GATHER CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE

There you have it.  The Supreme Court certainly has fertile ground to plow in its investigation of the corrupt and unethical practices and conduct of COLLIER, HOLMAN, and SALISBURY!  

AND THIS IS BUT ONE CASE AMONG MANY!

MUCH MORE TO COME ....