Trial was scheduled and did commence in the Medina County Court of Common Pleas, before TOTALLY CORRUPT JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, on Monday, November 9, 2009.
On June 29, 2009, defense counsel timely filed Defendant’s Combined Requests For Discovery, A Bill of Particulars, And Notice of The State’s Intention to Use Specified Evidence. The filing expressly requested, “A complete history of the Defendant’s past criminal record, if any.”
In his discovery response, filed by SALISBURY with the court on July 10, 2009, SALISBURY provided no such information.
On November 6, 2009, the very last business day prior to trial, SALISBURY sprung upon the defense copies of materials which he had received via facsimile transmission, dated September 11, 2009.
The materials consisted of a transmission of information regarding Defendant’s 2004 misdemeanor arrest (which did not bear on honesty, truth and veracity) and a Civil Protection Order issued on the basis of unfounded allegations and subsequently vacated by order of the County Court of Common Pleas.
In subsequent conversation with SALISBURY during the pre-trial conference, defense counsel sought and received a concession from SALISBURY that this information was not in any way related to the offense of aggravated burglary and was not admissible at trial.
Further, SALISBURY falsely represented to defense counsel that he did not intend to introduce this information in his case-in-chief at trial.
Defense counsel memorialized her conversation of November 6, 2009, with Salisbury in a letter to him, dated November 11, 2009.
AS YOU MIGHT REASONABLY SURMISE, SALISBURY ADMITTED THIS CLEARLY INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE THROUGH HIS FIRST WITNESS, CONTRARY TO THE RULES OF EVIDENCE AND THE PREVAILING CASE LAW, ALL WITH THE BLESSING OF TOTALLY CORRUPT JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER.
IS THERE ANY DOUBT THAT THE CORRUPTION ENDEMIC IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS AND PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE MUST BE INVESTIGATED BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE?
MUCH MORE TO COME ....
No comments:
Post a Comment