A WORD ABOUT THE USUAL AND CUSTOMARY MEDINA COUNTY CONSTITUTIONALLY DEFECTIVE CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS

It seems only appropriate to comment on the longstanding custom of issuing CONSTITUTIONALLY DEFECTIVE ARREST WARRANTS BASED UPON CONSTITUTIONALLY DEFECTIVE CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS here in Medina County.


Presented, once again, is the CONSTITUTIONALLY DEFECTIVE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT THAT, ACCORDING TO COLLIER, PASSES CONSTITUTIONAL MUSTER, despite the requirements of the United States Constitution, the rulings an holdings of the United States Supreme Court, and the Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure:

You will take note that there are no "facts" set out on the complaint to demonstrate what conduct of the Defendant constituted any alleged violation of the law, from which a neutral and detached judicial officer might otherwise decide whether there was probable cause to believe that a crime was committed and that the Defendant committed the specified the alleged offense.

Although, to be fair, there appear to be NO NEUTRAL AND DETACHED JUDICIAL OFFICERS IN MEDINA COUNTY.


It is clear to me that the prosecutors and judges in Medina County are all Roads Scholars  (not to be confused with Rhodes Scholars).

It is more than interesting that, when the Defense Counsel raised the issue of the constitutionally defective and invalid criminal complaint with TOTALL CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, his response was completely astounding.


COLLIER stated openly, on the record, "Am I supposed to be concerned with what happened in another court?"


The answer to the question is an unequivocal "YES!"


Any moron, even a MORON LIKE COLLIER, should know that constitutional protections attach to a Defendant from the outset of any criminal proceedings, rather than at the whim and wish of any "judge" who fails to follow the law.


In fact, COLLIER informed Defense Counsel that an indictment "cures" all of the Fourth Amendment violations by Sheriff's deputies, IN HIS OPINION.


That may be COLLIER's opinion, BUT IT IS CERTAINLY NOT THE LAW.  COLLIER WILL HAVE AN IMPOSSIBLE TASK FINDING ANY CASE LAW SUPPORTING HIS IDIOTIC PROPOSITION AND CONCLUSION.... UNLESS HE LOOKS TO HIS OWN PRIOR "RULINGS,"MADE AT THE DIRECTION AND BEHALF OF DEAN HOLMAN SO AS TO PRESERVE HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT.


Then too, assistant prosecutor SALISBURY "argued," without citing any competent legal authority as always, that the failing of Deputy Clinage to set out the facts, as required by the United States Constitution, to simply be "an error of form."


AN ERROR OF FORM?  The very fact that officers are required to file a criminal complaint is to comply with the requirements of the Constitution.  In Medina County, however, they do it because it's always been done this way .... THE WRONG WAY!


One might reasonably expect Corrupt Medina County Prosecutor DEAN HOLMAN, after more than 20 years in office, to have spent some amount of time instructing law enforcement officers as to the manner in which to prepare legally valid criminal complaints.

Then again, its always possible that HOLMAN, another Roads Scholar, doesn't know to do it himself!  He's been too busy promoting unlawful convictions, by any number of means of unethical  conduct, to preserve his tarnished 98% conviction rate, based upon, among other things, tainted evidence and constitutionally defective criminal complaints and arrest warrants.




MUCH MORE TO COME ....