Here's the headline:
Ohio prosecutors want law change to allow them to veto times when criminal defendants choose to have a judge decide a case
The complete article can be found at http://blog.cleveland.com/
It seems that prosecutors, outside of Medina County, may have concerns that a judge may be partial to or too lenient when deciding criminal cases.
SUCH IS CLEARLY NOT THE CASE IN MEDINA COUNTY!
CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN would love nothing better than to eliminate the jury system completely and have each and every defendant found guilty by LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.
As it is, the jury is just a mild inconvenience given the fact that LAPDOG COLLIER DOES EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO PREJUDICE A JURY AGAINST EACH AND EVERY PERSON APPEARING BEFORE HIM, THUS VIRTUALLY ASSURING HOLMAN CONVICTION AFTER CONVICTION.
Then, too, if the jury system were eliminated in Medina County, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS WOULD NOT HAVE TO WORK SO DILIGENTLY TO CONCEAL EVIDENCE. AS IT STANDS NOW, THEY HAVE TO RELY ON LAPDOG COLLIER TO CONCEAL EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE IF THE DEFENSE ATTORNEY PRESSES HARD ON THAT ISSUE.
THEN, TOO, LAPDOG COLLIER WOULDN'T HAVE TO SPEND SO MUCH OF HIS TIME CLEANING UP AFTER HIMSELF BY TAMPERING WITH, ALTERING, AND AMENDING ALL OF THOSE TROUBLESOME TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS!
NO ONE WHO APPEARS BEFORE LAPDOG COLLIER SHOULD EVER CONSENT TO A BENCH TRIAL. YOU WILL HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO CHANCE THAT YOUR CASE WILL BE DECIDED FAIRLY ON THE MERITS AND ON THE COMPETENT, CREDIBLE EVIDENCE!
In the final analysis, this blogger agrees completely with the reader who sent along the news article. One will never hear CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN and his criminal assistants (an apt characterization) object to having LAPDOG COLLIER railroad an innocent defendant, without a jury.
MUCH MORE TO COME .....
No comments:
Post a Comment