LAPDOG COLLIER, THAT STUPID CRIMINAL, and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR AND ANOTHER STUPID CRIMINAL, are so accustomed to violating the United States Constitution, the Rules of Evidence, and the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct, they have become very casual and downright careless as they conspire to violate the rights of innocent citizens whom they railroad into prison.
To cite but one example, LAPDOG COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR met in LAPDOG'S chambers in an ex parte meeting (BANNED BY THE OHIO CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT) and conspired to lay out a plan to defeat the meritorious post-conviction motions filed by this Defendant's defense counsel.
While the Defense Counsel waited in the Kangaroo Courtroom No. 1 operated by LAPDOG COLLIER AND HIS CRIMINAL ACCOMPLICES, LAPDOG AND SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, were discussing the motions to be "heard" momentarily in Kangaroo Courtroom No. 1.
LAPDOG COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, were discussing the unlawfully compelled testimony of the defendant's wife at trial by LAPDOG COLLIER, following a sham hearing on the morning of the first day of trial.
During the ex parte conversation between LAPDOG COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, which could be heard out into the Kangaroo Courtroom No. 1, LAPDOG COLLIER stated to SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, "YOU COMPELLED HER TO TESTIFY," referring to the unlawfully compelled testimony of DEFENDANT'S WIFE.
LAPDOG COLLIER THEN QUICKLY ADDED, "BUT I'LL HELP YOU!"
It is worthy, at this juncture, to consider the LAW and the OHIO RULES OF EVIDENCE.
OHIO RULES OF EVIDENCE, RULE 601 EXPRESSLY PROVIDES:
RULE 601. General Rule of Competency
Every person is competent to be a witness except:
(A) Those of unsound mind, and children under ten years of age, who appear incapable of receiving just impressions of the facts and transactions respecting which they are examined, or of relating them truly.
(B) A spouse testifying against the other spouse charged with a crime except when either of the following applies:
(1) a crime against the testifying spouse or a child of either spouse is charged;
(2) the testifying spouse elects to testifyAs to the Defendant whose case is being profiled at this blog, here are the following FACTS:
1) This defendant was not charged with any crime involving his wife or children:
2) This defendant's wife asserted her spousal privilege on no fewer than FOUR OCCASIONS.
3) LAPDOG COLLIER COMPELLED THIS DEFENDANT'S WIFE TO TESTIFY, IN SPITE OF THE LAW, THE RULES OF EVIDENCE, AND THE UNABIGUOUS ASSERTION OF THE SPOUSAL PRIVILEGE.
LAPDOG COLLIER, THE STUPID CRIMINAL, VIOLATED THE LAW AND RULES OF EVIDENCE SOLELY TO PRESERVE HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME POLITICAL APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH, COMPLIMENTS OF HIS MASTER, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DEM PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEM PARTY.
THE OHIO CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT , CANON 3(B)(7) EXPRESSLY PROVIDES:
A judge shall not initiate, receive, permit, or consider communications made to the judge outside the presence of the parties or their representatives concerning a pending or impending proceeding .
IT IS CLEAR THAT COLLIER REGULARLY AND ROUTINELY VIOLATES THE LAW AND THE OHIO CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT IN HIS OWN SELF-INTEREST!
THIS IS JUST ONE MORE PROOF TO JUSTIFY AND INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WITH A VIEW TOWARD SWEEPING ALL OF THESE SLEAZY ATTORNEYS, LIKE LAPDOG COLLIER, FROM THE HALLOWED HALLS OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION.
MUCH MORE TO COME ....
No comments:
Post a Comment