WHAT HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, ANOTHER STUPID CRIMINAL, IS TRYING TO CONCEAL FROM THE PUBLIC: ISSUE #1 - INVASION OF THE DEFENSE CAMP

The blogger has pointed out that this innocent Defendant's Reply Brief Newby Kern's Opposition to Bond, like many other documents in a whole host of cases, has not been publicly displayed at the website of the Medina County of Clerk for one simple reason: HOLMAN THE CORRUPT WANTS TO SHIELD HIS OFFICE FROM PUBLIC EXPOSURE OF THE CRIMINAL CONDUCT AND MISCONDUCT BY HIS OFFICE.


The blogger, in this and in immediate future posts, will publish portion of this innocent Defendant's Reply Brief.


HERE IS THE FIRST INSTALLMENT OF THAT WHICH HOLMAN THE CORRUPT WISHES TO HIDE FROM PUBLIC VIEW:

            Medina County Assistant Prosecutor Scott Salisbury Invaded the Defense Camp By Monitoring Privileged Telephone Conversations Between the Defense Investigator and the Petitioner.

            During a pre-trial conference at the Medina County Courthouse on November 6, 2001, Medina County Assistant Prosecutor Scott Salisbury admitted to defense counsel that he had monitored telephone conversations between the Petitioner and his father, who Salisbury well knew to be defense counsel’s investigator in the case at bar. Those conversations, prior to trial, were privileged communications concerning the status of the case at bar and and defense trial strategy.  Government invasion of the defense camp compels conviction to be set aside as constitutionally defective.  Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293, 307 (1966).

            Petitioner filed his sworn proof of Salisbury’s invasion of the defense camp by monitoring privileged communications between the Petitioner and his defense counsel’s investigator in the manner of the Sworn Declaration of Paul M. Hartman, Investigator, The Cramer Law Group, LLC, previously attached to Petitioner’s Post Hearing Rebuttal With Exhibits, filed with the trial court on January 4, 2010, is presently attached as Exhibit 3.

            The Medina County Prosecutor has, to date, advanced no countervailing evidence to challenge or dispute Petitioner’s evidence that Salisbury invaded the defense camp.

READERS WILL TAKE PARTICULAR NOTE OF THE FACT THAT NEWBY KERN DENIES VIOLATING THIS INNOCENT DEFENDANT'S 6th AMENDMENT RIGHTS, ALTHOUGH HE PRODUCES NO PROOF OR EVIDENCE, DESPITE THE FACT THAT THIS INNOCENT DEFENDANT HAS, INDEED, OFFERED SUCH PROOF.  OBVIOUSLY, HOLMAN THE CORRUPT DOES NOT WANT THE PUBLIC TO KNOW THAT HIS OFFICE ROUTINELY INVADES THE DEFENSE CAMP (INVALIDATING ANY CONVICTION RISING THEREFROM) BY MONITORING THE TELEPHONE CONVERSATIONS BETWEEN INMATES AT THE COUNTY JAIL AND INMATES' DEFENSE ATTORNEYS.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....