WHAT HOLMAN THE CORRUPT, ANOTHER STUPID CRIMINAL, IS TRYING TO CONCEAL FROM THE PUBLIC: ISSUE #6 - DESTRUCTION OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE

Newby Kern then had the audacity to claim that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, has had nothing to do with destroying the exculpatory evidence in this case, despite SALISBURY'S own claims, set out below.

Medina County Assistant Prosecutor Salisbury Has Insinuated That the Exculpatory Evidence Withheld From Petitioner at Trial Has Been Destroyed.

            Medina County Assistant Prosecutor has understandably been outraged that his unlawful and unethical conduct has been openly exposed at an Internet blog site exposing the corruption in the Medina County Courts.  In his anger, Salisbury has submitted a number of electronic messages to the blog, often employing assumed identities, intended to threaten, intimidate, extort, harass and deride the blog, the Petitioner, and the Petitioner’s family.

            In one such electronic message, Salisbury threatened a lawsuit but, at the same, admitted that abuses of the Brady Rule in the Medina County Courts are ongoing because the Brady Rule “is almost impossible to enforce which is why the abuse has been going on.”

            A copy of Salisbury’s electronic message to the blog, dated January 1, 2011 and previously attached to Petitioner’s Surreply and Motion to Strike State’s Out of Rule Second Response; Motion to Disqualify Medina County Prosecutor’s Office, is appended hereto as Exhibit 13.

            On January 3, 2011, Salisbury sent a message to the blog, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com, in which insinuated that the exculpatory evidence withheld from Petitioner at trial had been destroyed.  In his electronic message to the blog, Salisbury wrote:

            And can you prove that these illustrious prosectors (sic) withheld evidence?

You do realize that if the courts were really corrupt as you have said with FACT that they are … they would have destroyed all proof by now.  (Emphasis added.)

Because the courts are really not corrupt, and the evidence that Matthew is not the violent felon that nearly killed his family is not and never has been in existence.

He got off easy Paul, 5 years instead of 10, and convicted by a JURY, not a double cross plea deal like you claim.[1]

A copy of Salisbury’s electronic message to the blog, attached to Petitioner’s Reply to States Opposition to Correct the Record; Opposition to State’s Motion to Disqualify Petitioner’s Counsel, is appended hereto as Exhibit 14.

            This prosecutor has yet to produce the withheld the exculpatory evidence and, moreover, drove to Columbus to file an Affidavit of Disqualification of Judge Brown with the Supreme Court on the very day before Judge Brown’s scheduled evidentiary hearing regarding the withheld exculpatory evidence, for the very purpose of evading and evading the evidentiary hearing.

---

[1] At sentencing, Salisbury “argued” for a 10-year sentence.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....