STA-PUF KERN, A TYPICAL SLEAZY ATTORNEY, CAUGHT LYIN" AND DENYIN' AGAIN!

In the prior post at this blog, the attention of the reader was drawn to a recent brief filed by STA-FUF KERN with the Ohio Ninth District Court of Appeals, which CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN HAS CONCEALED FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND INSPECTION IN AN ATTEMPT TO PREVENT EVEN MORE EMBARRASSMENT TO HIS OFFICE, WHICH IS REGULARLY ENGAGED IN THE USUAL AND CUSTOMARY PRACTICE OF ALL SLEAZY ATTORNEYS, LYIN' & DENYIN'.

In the prior post at this blog, readers were presented with the TRUE FACTS which unequivocally PROVE THAT STAF-PUF KERN LIED IN HIS BRIEF WHEN HE ALLEGED:

"There is no evidence, in the record or anywhere, the transcript of the first trial was altered.   Judge Markus gave [the Defendant] ample opportunity to submit such evidence prior to the start of the second trial, which [the Defendant] failed to do."

Readers were shown PROOF POSITIVE that this innocent and railroaded Defendant produced competent and credible evidence, IN THE RECORD, that the transcripts of the trial had been TAMPERED WITH, MATERIALLY ALTERED, AND CHANGED.

AS WAS SHOWN, ST-PUF KERN, ANOTHER TYPICAL SLEAZY ATTORNEY, AMONG MANY, IN THE EMPLOY OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN, STRUCK OUT ON THAT LIE!!!

Let's examine another of STA-PUF KERN'S COMPLETE FABRICATIONS, set out at Page 8 of his brief, which was fashioned in likeness of Grimm's Fairy Tales:

"No contemporaneous objection was made to the testimony concerning the statements made by the six year-old...(Tr at 450) .  Under Evidence Rule 103(A)(1), the lack of any objection on this basis means that [Defendant] forfeited appellate review."

STA-PUF KERN has asserted unequivocally that Defense Counsel failed to raise an objection to the admission of hearsay statements of a six year-old into evidence, offered during the PERJURED TESTIMONY OF ONE OF THE STATE'S WITNESSES, WHICH PERJURY HAD BEEN SUBORNED BY ASS. COUNTY PROSECUTOR SCOTT SLEAZEBURY.  Readers will take note of the fact that STA-PUF KERN cites to Page 450 of the trial transcript (Tr. at 450).

WHAT SAY WE ALL MOSEY ON OVER TO PAGE 450 OF THE TRANSCRIPT, PRESENTED BELOW, TO SEE WHETHER OR NOT THE DEFENSE COUNSEL RAISED AN OBJECTION TO THE HEARSAY STATEMENTS OF A SIX YEAR-OLD, SHALL WE?

Lo and Behold!  WHAT HAVE WE HERE?  

Contrary to the FALSE CLAIM of STA-PUF KERN, ANOTHER MEDINA COUNTY SLEAZY ATTORNEY, THE RECORD CLEARLY REVEALS THAT DEFENSE COUNSEL OBJECTED TO THE ADMISSION OF THE HEARSAY TESTIMONY OF THE SIX YEAR-OLD CHILD!

STA-PUF KERN must be relying upon the fat that the judges of the Ninth District Court of Appeals DO NOT VERIFY THE CITES IN HIS BRIEF. AFTER ALL, "LIE A LITTLE. LIE A LOT.  WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?" SAYS STA-PUF KERN, IN LINE WITH THE OFFICIAL POLICY OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN.

It certainly appears that STA-PUF KERN, who obviously LIED in his brief, is worthy of investigation by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio!