LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN, SALISBURY CONSIDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION TO BE NO MORE THAN "A SCRAP OF PAPER" !

From the date that the blogger first began publishing this blog exposing the corruption in the Medina County Courts, Ass. Medina County prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, has been the mouthpiece of LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER and CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.  Of these three, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, is obviously the most expendable and can rely on HOLMAN and COLLIER to give him cover and to protect him from the consequences of his unethical and unlawful conduct.

Interestingly, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, speaking for LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER and CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, sent the following email message to this blog:

A fine public servant dufIus.medina@gmail.com via blogger.bounces.google.com to me show details Jun 27 A fine public servant has sent you a link to a blog: Why must you dishonor us, we are doing our jobs. The Constitution is a scrap of paper that is just guidelines, not rules. We need aggressive prosecution, or crime will spin out of control. If you knew the truth, you would understand. Blog: MEDINA CORRUPTION - ALL THE NEWS THAT'S FIT TO PRINT, BUT WASN'T UNTIL NOW! Post: SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, PERSONALLY ENDORSES "THE LITTLE BLUE PILL" Link: http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/06/salisbury-pathological-liar-personally.html

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES IS NO MORE THAN A SCRAP OF PAPER?  ARE YOU KIDDING ME ???


While this may be the opinion of SALISBURY, HOLMAN, and COLLIER, as evidenced by the vary basic fact that these three crooks daily deprive Medina County citizens of the Constitutional protections, the Supreme Court of the United States disagrees.  Perhaps that is why LAPDOG COLLIER "rules" contrary to the holdings of the Supreme Court.


Since none of these three is particularly cerebral, it is appropriate to point out that "aggressive prosecution" does not equate with "UNLAWFUL PROSECUTION," the daily stock-in-trade of the Medina County Prosecutor's Office and the Kangaroo Court of LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.


AS FOR THIS BLOGGER, HE WOULD PREFER TO RELY ON THE GUARANTIES PROVIDED BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND THE JUDGMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT THAN UPON THE MISGUIDED AND UNLAWFUL DECISIONS OF LAPDOG COLLIER, DINO HOLMAN, THE CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR, AND SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

A LITTLE HUMOR GOES A LONG WAY !

Given the oppressive nature of the level of complete corruption in the Medina County Courts, laughter is a refreshing break from the realities of the grime and corruption with which the blogger deals daily in his quest to expose these crooks and their unlawful conduct to the light of day.

In the past, the blogger has had an ongoing duel with SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, at Craig's List.  Interestingly, SALISBURY removed each and every message that the blogger posted to Craig's List. 


In fact, it soon became obvious that SALISBURY was spending his entire "workday" trolling Craig's List, instead of providing the "professional" services for which had been paid by taxpayers, constituting the criminal offense of Theft in Office.


Nevertheless, the blogger often injected humor into his Craig's List posts.  After all, who better to laugh at than LAPDOG COLLIER and SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR?


HERE THEN ARE BUT A FEW EXAMPLES OF THE BLOGGER'S POSTS ON CRAIG'S LIST, POKING MORE THAN A LITTLE FUN AT LAPDOG COLLIER AND SALISBURY:

LAPDOG OHIO "JUDGE" awarded new STUDDED COLLAR

---

Date: 2011-04-23, 7:21PM EDT
Reply to: your anonymous craigslist address will appear here ^{[Errors when replying to ads?]}

---

A county-wide holiday in Medina County, April Fool's Day, has been named after and dedicated to COMPLETELY WORTHLESS AND TOTALLY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER. In festivities held at the Medina County Courthouse/Railroad Station & Mosque, COLLIER, who has been the LAPDOG OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DEAN HOLMAN FOR YEARS, was presented with a new studded collar. The studded collar also contained an engraved property tag inscribed, "PROPERTY OF THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE. DROP IN ANY MAILBOX IF FOUND!" THE IDENTITY TAG ALSO BEARS A HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INDICIA (for obvious reasons): "DANGER OF E-COLI CONTAMINATION!" (AS IF ONE COULDN'T TELL BY THE SMELL!)
READ MORE AT http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/04/salisbury-pathological-liar-leads.html

columbus craigslist > personals > rants & raves

LAPDOG OHIO JUDGE, RACIST PROSECUTOR CRY "FOWL"

---

Date: 2011-05-01, 2:17AM EDT
Reply to: your anonymous craigslist address will appear here ^{[Errors when replying to ads?]}

---

LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER and RACIST ASSISTANT COUNTY PROSECUTOR CRY "FOWL" (as SALISBURY spells it; properly spelled "FOUL") after having been eliminated in the first round of competition in the annual MEDINA COUNTY GREAT SPELLING BEE!


SALISBURY was eliminated in the first round when he was unable to spell "ESP." SALISBURY raised an immediate objection and claimed, "Look, I can spell "NIGGER" perfectly! Judges were unimpressed, however, and refused to believe SALISBURY'S CLAIM, SINCE HAS HAS ESTABLISHED A WELL-FOUNDED REPUTATION AS A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.


If you wish to verify SALISBURY'S CREDENTIALS AS A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, YOU CAN GO TO http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/03/salisbury-pathological-liar-lies-openly.html AND TO http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/04/salisbury-pathological-liar-lies-again.html AND ALSO TO http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/03/salisbury-continues-to-lie-claims-he.html .


LAPDOG MEDINA "JUDGE" COLLIER, A COMPLETELY WORTHLESS AND CORRUPT "ATTORNEY," was similarly eliminated in the first round of competition when he was unable to spell "ELECTION." LAPDOG COLLIER is unfamiliar with the term since he has never faced any opposition in a contested election after having been POLITICALLY APPOINTED TO THE COURT IN 1988. You may wish to review http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/christopher-collier-case-fix.html AND http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/corruption-reigns-in-medina-county.html


LAPDOG COLLIER, a Republican, has been awarded a lifetime appointment to the Medina County Court compliments of corrupt Medina County Prosecutor Dean Holman, as long as COLLIER continues to take his marching orders from HOLMAN.


HOLMAN was also eliminated in the first round of competition when he was unable to spell "ETHICS," a concept that remains completely foreign to him. In this regard, you may wish to go to http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/typical-case-of-holman-hiding-evidence.html

LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE GETS PERSONAL FIRE HYDRANT

---

Date: 2011-06-02, 2:09AM EDT
Reply to: your anonymous craigslist address will appear here ^{[Errors when replying to ads?]}

---

The Medina Water Department, ever eager to please "public officials," has just installed a NEW, PERSONAL FIRE HYDRANT IN THE CHAMBERS OF LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, following a number of citizen complaints. It seems when there are no INNOCENT CITIZENS FOR LAPDOG COLLIER TO PISS ON, HE HAS HAD TO "RELIEVE" HIMSLF AT A NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS ON MEDINA'S PUBLIC SQUARE. A number of female dog walkers have complained that LAPDOG COLLIER has been elbowing them out of the way to get to his favorite "watering holes." One irate citizen complained, "I'M TIRED OF LAPDOG COLLIER PISSING ON MY BOOTS." Seems like rank hath its privileges.

http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/christopher-collier-case-fix.html 

LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE DENIED ENTRY TO CLEVELAND IX CENTER

---

Date: 2011-05-01, 1:47AM EDT
Reply to: your anonymous craigslist address will appear here ^{[Errors when replying to ads?]}

---

Security personnel at the Cleveland IX Center refused entry to Medina LAPDOG JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, who attempted to attend a recent national dog show held there. Citing a longstanding regulation that all non-competitor dogs, and especially lapdogs, must be on leash, security officers observed that COLLIER was unattended by any member of the Medina County Prosecutor's Office and was thusly determined to be off leash. Further details at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/04/salisbury-pathological-liar-leads.html

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

TAMPERING WITH THE TRIAL RECORD !!!

The blogger has recently discovered an astonishing new wrinkle in the corruption at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station.

IT SEEMS AS THOUGH SOMEONE OR SOMEONES OVER AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION HAS/HAVE TAMPERED WITH THE TRIAL RECORD IN THE MATTER OF THE CASE BEING PROFILED HERE AT THE BLOG.


THIS IS CERTAINLY AN INTERESTING DEVELOPMENT AND INDICATIVE OF THE LEVEL OF COMPLETE CORRUPTION TO BE FOUND IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.


Firstly, it is significant to take note of the fact that LAPDOG COLLIER appointed an attorney, different from the Defendant's trial attorney, to represent the Defendant in his Direct Appeal.


Logically, as LAPDOG COLLIER'S thought process went, the trial transcript would not likely be reviewed by the Defendant's trial counsel.  LAPDOG COLLIER was completely incorrect in that assessment.

Secondly, it took the court reporter 13 months following the conclusion of Defendant's trial to file the trial transcripts with the Court of Appeals, having requested and been granted no fewer that 8 extensions of time to complete and file the trial transcript.  However, the court reporter managed to file no fewer than 7 transcripts of hearings and full trials with the Court of Appeals, all heard after the conclusion of the Defendant's trial!


LAPDOG COLLIER, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, and CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN MUST BE SLOW READERS!


IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THE DELAY IN FILING THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS WAS DUE TO THE TIME NEEDED BY LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN, AND SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, TO PROOF-READ, EDIT, AND DOCTOR THE TRANSCRIPTS?


MAYBE SO !


What LAPDOG COLLIER, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AND CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN did not accurately predict was that the Defendant's trial counsel and her investigator would READ the trial transcripts.


As it turns out, there are some glaring omissions in the trial record.  Inappropriate comments made by LAPDOG COLLIER during the proceedings, but well remembered by witnesses, are not to be found in the transcript.  Also, challenges made by witnesses to SALISBURY'S honesty and integrity, or more appropriately the lack thereof, offered in trial testimony are mysteriously missing from the record.

The blogger fully understands how a court reporter may miss some of the commentary during heated exchanges in court.

Yet, what is particularly puzzling is that there are gaps in witness testimony that go directly to issues raised by the Defendant on appeal, witness testimony and comments from LAPDOG COLLIER which prove unequivocally that LAPDOG COLLIER DEPRIVED THIS DEFENDANT OF A FAIR TRIAL. 


Who could possibly benefit from these omissions from the trial transcripts?  Certainly not the Defendant!


It is rather curious that the gaps in the trial transcripts seem to align with issues of improprieties submitted to LAPDOG COLLIER in a defense brief filed in it's Motion for a New Trial, found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=77


Given the fact that the trial transcript is clearly neither accurate nor complete, Defendant's trial counsel filed a Motion to Correct Transcripts, setting out in detail deficiencies in the transcript that are currently known.  The Motion to Correct Transcripts can be found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=122

Further, tampering with and altering the trial record is just one more felony offense, TAMPERING WITH RECORDS, in violation of Section 2913.42(A) of the Ohio Revised Code, a FELONY OF THE THIRD DEGREE.


Section 2913.42, Tampering With Records, provides:

(A) No person, knowing the person has no privilege to do so, and with purpose to defraud or knowing that the person is facilitating a fraud, shall do any of the following:

(1) Falsify, destroy, remove, conceal, alter, deface, or mutilate any writing, computer software, data, or record;

(2) Utter any writing or record, knowing it to have been tampered with as provided in division (A)(1) of this section.

(B)(1) Whoever violates this section is guilty of tampering with records.

(2) Except as provided in division (B)(4) of this section, if the offense does not involve data or computer software, tampering with records is whichever of the following is applicable:

(4) If the writing, data, computer software, or record is kept by or belongs to a local, state, or federal governmental entity, a felony of the third degree.


IT MAY REQUIRE INQUIRY BY THE FEDERAL GRAND JURY, BUT THIS "MYSTERY" WILL BE SOLVED, IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE.


The criminals, and stupid criminals at that, over at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station, the "guardians" of the public safety, seem to racking up quite a collection of felony offenses themselves, although as yet unindicted.


THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT THAT THE CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS MUST BE ADDRESSED BY THE CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE !


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER SHUDDERS AS HE PREPARES TO FACE THE HANGMAN !

As LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, knows only too well, he is about to face the hangman!


As shown in the prior segment of this blog, Defense Counsel submitted an Affidavit of Disqualification to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, seeking to disqualify LAPDOG COLLIER, a crooked judge, from hearing and deciding the Defendant's Petition for Post-Conviction Relief.

The Chief Justice dismissed Defense Counsel's Affidavit on procedural grounds because the Defendant's Petition for Post-Conviction Relief had not yet been filed when the Affidavit was filed.

However, under extreme pressure from Defense Counsel's Affidavit and this blog, LAPDOG COLLIER had no other choice than to recuse himself from consideration of this Defendant's Petition for Post-Conviction Relief.


In his order of self-recusal, dated July 6, 2011 and found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=119 ,
LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, asserts:

To avoid the appearance of impropriety, the Honorable Christopher J. Collier does hereby recuse himself from the within matter.  The Supreme Court of Ohio will be notified of this recusal and the appointment of a Visiting Judge will be requested.

Firstly, LAPDOG COLLIER, a crooked judge, cannot legitimately lay claim to the title "Honorable." LAPDOG COLLIER is positioned as far from "honorable" as can be imagined, since he has sold any integrity he may have once had to CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN in exchange for his uncontested lifetime appointment to the Medina County Bench.


Secondly, LAPDOG COLLIER has incorrectly drafted his "order," which should be properly worded:

In order to avoid any further impropriety, Less-Than-Honorable Christopher J. Collier recuses himself from the within matter.  The Supreme Court of Ohio will be notified whenever the within-named Collier musters the courage to request the appointment of a Visiting Judge, whom he hopes will be one of his buddies, and who will overlook his egregious misconduct in the within matter.

The reader will note that, to date, more than one month after his order, there is no evidence that LAPDOG COLLIER has either contacted the Supreme Court of Ohio, or requested the appointment of a Visiting Judge.

The reason for LAPDOG COLLIER'S reluctance to request the appointment of a Visiting Judge is obvious.

AS SOON AS THIS DEFENDANT'S APPEAL AND PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF HAVE BEEN DECIDED, THE INVESTIGATION OF THE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL AND PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT BY THE OHIO SUPREME COURT WILL COMMENCE.  THAT COMPLAINT IS  CURRENTLY HELD IN ABEYANCE BY THE SUPREME COURT, PENDING DISPOSITION OF DEFENDANT'S LITIGATION.


AS LAPDOG COLLIER KNOWS ONLY TOO WELL, HE WILL HAVE TO FACE THE HANGMAN, IN THIS CASE THE DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE SUPREME COURT, TO ANSWER FOR HIS ONGOING UNETHICAL AND UNLAWFUL CONDUCT.


FURTHER, AS LAPDOG COLLIER KNOWS FULL WELL, IT IS LIKELY THAT HIS DISBARMENT WILL SOON FOLLOW.


THAT, OF COURSE, DOES NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE LIKELIHOOD THAT HE WILL BE INDICTED BY A FEDERAL GRAND JURY AND TRIED IN U.S. DISTRICT COURT, ALONG WITH SALISBURY AND HOLMAN, FOR HIS UNLAWFUL CONDUCT.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

UPCOMING EVENT !!!

On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 8:00 am sharp,  this blog will expose that the criminals who operate the "criminal justice system" in the MEDINA COUNTY COURTS have sunk to an all-time low!


It is not reasonable to believe that this is the first time that they have done this, but the readers can be reasonably assured that this is the first time they've been caught!


On Wednesday, readers will learn more about the depth of CORRUPTION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTS!


THE CRIMINALS WORKING OVER AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION HAVE SUNK SO LOW AS TO TAMPER WITH, ALTER, AND CHANGE THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE TRIAL RECORD OF THE INNOCENT DEFENDANT WHOM THEY HAVE RAILROADED INTO STATE PRISON !!!


Not only have LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, AND ASS. PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, DELIBERATELY DEPRIVED THIS DEFENDANT OF A FAIR TRIAL,  THEY HAVE NOW ATTEMPTED TO UNLAWFULLY DEPRIVE HIM OF A FAIR APPEAL.


THERE IS NOW LITTLE DOUBT THAT PRISON CELLS AWAIT THE ARRIVAL OF THESE COMMON CRIMINALS WHO VIOLATE THE LAW UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW FROM WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION.


BE SURE TO CHECK IN ON WEDNESDAY!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

HOW TO DUMP A CROOKED JUDGE !

Although certainly not perfect, the Ohio Revised Code does provide for procedures to dump a crooked judge like LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE!


Section 2701.03(A) of the Ohio Revised Code, Disqualification of Common Pleas Judge, expressly provides:

(A) If a judge of the court of common pleas allegedly is interested in a proceeding pending before the court, allegedly is related to or has a bias or prejudice for or against a party to a proceeding pending before the court or a party’s counsel, or allegedly otherwise is disqualified to preside in a proceeding pending before the court, any party to the proceeding or the party’s counsel may file an affidavit of disqualification with the clerk of the supreme court in accordance with division (B) of this section.

The legislature refers kindly refers to "bias," which is simply a kinder and gentler manner of referring to JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT.

As has been already shown at this blog, LAPDOG COLLIER has demonstrated an ongoing pattern of judicial misconduct, evidenced in the 2008 trial of State v Johnson, and in the 2009 case being profiled here at this blog.

A comparison of the transcripts in both cases readily discloses that LAPDOG COLLIER has established a pattern of overruling properly grounded defense objections to misconduct by SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, thus facilitating SALISBURY'S pervasive misconduct throughout the course of these and other trials.

In the case being profiled here at the blog, significant damage and harm has been done to the innocent man unlawfully convicted solely on account of the egregious misconduct of SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, and LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.

The law provides for parallel remedies following conviction: 1) an appeal by right to the Court of Appeals; and 2) a petition for post-conviction relief submitted to the trial court.

Now the Petition for Post-Conviction Relief is intended to be submitted to the trial judge in order to provide him an opportunity to correct any errant rulings, depriving the defendant of constitutional protections, and affording an honest judge the opportunity to correct his own errors and to properly administer justice.

However, in the case being profiled here at the blog, it is perfectly clear that LAPDOG COLLIER made no innocent errors when he railroaded this innocent man.  Therefore, there is absolutely no question, because of LAPDOG COLLIER'S deliberate misconduct, that he would ever reverse any, much less all, of his intentionally "errant" rulings.  For LAPDOG COLLIER to reverse his unlawful rulings would be for him to jeopardize his lifetime uncontested to the Medina County Court, granted to him by CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEMOCRAT PARTY LEADERSHIP.

Given the fact that the Defendant in the case being profiled here at the blog has absolutely no opportunity to receive proper justice by and through the corrupt Kangaroo Court of LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, his Defense Counsel filed an affidavit with the Supreme Court to disqualify COLLIER from any further participation in this case, and requesting the appointment of an "INDEPENDENT AND HONEST JUDGE, WITH NO CONNECTION TO THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, AND MEDINA COUNTY POLITICS."

Defense Counsel, an accomplished retired Federal prosecutor who has tried many Federal cases according to the Rules of Evidence and the prevailing case law, unlike a "trial" in the Kangaroo Court of LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, cites the following bases to disqualify LAPDOG COLLIER, A CLEARLY CROOKED JUDGE, from deciding the Petition for Post Conviction Relief:

1)  Withholding exculpatory evidence, which, in this instance, rises to the level of Tampering with Evidence, a felony offense;

2)  Endorsing Invasion of the Defense Camp;

3)  Permitting perjured testimony from a legally incompetent witness:

4)  Admitting forbidden "other acts" into evidence, in violation of Rule 404(b) of the Rules of Evidence;

5)  Compelling Defendant's wife to testify, thus depriving her of her absolute right to refuse to testify against her spouse;

6)  Admitting the unredacted 9-1-1 dispatch tape into evidence when the caller was available and did testify;

7)  Overruling properly grounded defense objections, thus facilitating the misconduct of SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR;

8)  Failing to compel SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, to produce Deputy Douglas Clinage, one of the Keystone Cops, who had been served with a defense subpoena but failed to appear at trial;

9)  Permitting SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, to make numerous false, improper, and unethical remarks in his closing argument;

10)  Permitting SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, to denigrate defense counsel.

Defense Counsel's Affidavit to Disqualify LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER can be found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspxcase=09CR0229&p=1&a=16

Readers may note that the Affidavit is not displayed in its entirety in an attempt by the Clerk of Court to shield LAPDOG COLLIER from the assessment of his lack of integrity and honesty, proffered by Defense Counsel, an honest attorney.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

ANOTHER SCUMBAG JUDGE SENTENCED TO PRISON, WILL LAPDOG COLLIER BE NEXT?

"Do you remember me?  Do you remember my son? she screamed again. "He's gone," she cried, "He shot himself in the heart, YOU SCUMBAG!"


Those agonizing words came from the mother of a young man unlawfully sent to a youth detention center in Pennsylvania by a corrupt judge like LAPDOG COLLIER, solely for the purpose of lining his own pockets with kickbacks from the owners of the privately owned and run detention facility.


Luzerne County, Pennsylvania judge Mark Ciavarella was found guilty at trial in U.S. District Court on 12 counts of racketeering (RICO) and fraud charges.


To regular readers of this blog, this must certainly seem eerily similar, since this blogger predicted that the U.S. Attorney could easily charge LAPDOG COLLIER, CORRUPT MEDINA PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, and SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, with racketeering charges.


Readers may easily reference that prediction in a prior post at this blog, captioned THE MEDINA COURT SYSTEM: A RACKETEER INFLUENCED CORRUPT ORGANIZATION, 
found at  http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/medina-court-system-racketeer.html


Readers may also wish to review another post, captioned AN ALTERNATIVE THEORY UPON WHICH TO PROSECUTE CORRUPT PUBLIC OFFICIALS, found at  http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/alternative-theory-upon-which-to.html

It is interesting to note that Federal Prosecutors in Pennsylvania followed a course of prosecution of the corrupt Pennsylvania judge as precisely set out at this blog some while ago.


Ultimately, corrupt Pennsylvania judge Mark Ciavarella was sentenced to 28 years in the United States Penitentiary.


A CNN news article detailing the plight of Ciavarella can be found at http://www.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/08/12/pennsylvania.judge.sentenced/index.html?eref=rss_us

With Ciavarella sent down the river for 28 years, that is just one more "scumbag" judge gone.

The only question now remaining is just how much time "scumbag" judge, LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, will receive for very similar unlawful conduct.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....

LAPDOG COLLIER DOESN'T TAKE CORRECTION FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS

The trial record is replete with unfounded claims by Salisbury, The Pathological Liar, that Defense Counsel “misleads the court,” and “misstates the law,” when, in fact, it was Salisbury, The Pathological Liar, who perpetually misled the court and the jury and misstated the law in the most general terms, since he failed to cite even one case during the entirety of the proceeding. 

Admittedly it was difficult, if not impossible, for Salisbury to mislead LAPDOG COLLIER, who was complicit with Salisbury throughout the proceedings.

As the Defendant more than adequately set forth, it was the Assistant Prosecutor who affirmatively misled the LAPDOG COLLIER by claiming that criminal trespass was not a lesser included offense of aggravated burglary, despite having been reversed and counseled otherwise by the 9^th District Court of Appeals in State v. Morris, 2008-Ohio-3209 (9^th Dist. App. 2008), tried before LAPDOG Judge Collier, Morris, 2008-Ohio-3209, ¶ 14.  LAPDOG Judge Collier also should have remembered that the Appeals Court reversed him in Morris for not charging the jury with the lesser-included offense instruction in an aggravated burglary case.  Yet, in this case , the same Assistant Prosecutor Salisbury, The Pathological Liar, affirmatively misled the same LAPDOG Judge Collier into not giving the lesser-included criminal trespass instruction.

            The level of complete dishonesty of Salisbury, The Pathological Liar, and the corrupt trial judge LAPDOG COLLIER is exemplified in an exchange between Salisbury and the trial judge on the merits of properly instructing the jury on the lesser-included offense of Criminal Trespass.

            SALISBURY:     Judge?

            COURT:              Yes?

SALISBURY:     If I could just address that point, Judge.  My position – and I think there are cases that back this up – that a criminal trespass  -- the criminal trespass would not be appropriate.

(BRIEF INTERRUPTION IN THE PROCEEDINGS)

SALISBURY:      The State’s position is, the criminal trespass could not be an appropriate lesser included offense on an aggravated burglary, because the specific facts of the case are that he trespassed into a habitation….

                             The trespass into a habitation, Judge, is a burglary. It can’t be a criminal trespass.

COURT:              And a trespass into an unoccupied structure is a criminal trespass.  Is that your point?

SALISBURY:      Right, not into a habitation…. I believe there are cases that say it is fact specific, and under these facts that have come in front of this jury, criminal trespass does not apply.

                             We are not seeking a lesser included offense.

DEFENSE COUNSEL:  I did some research to be absolutely sure, but it’s my understanding that criminal trespass is a lesser included offense ….

COURT:              Can I tell you what I think he’s arguing?  And I’ve heard it before.  I guess that criminal trespass can, in certain situations, be a lesser included.  He’s (sic) arguing that, according to the facts of the case, because it’s a trespass into a habitation, that it’s different.  In other words, I think that you’re going to find that there are criminal trespass instructions given, but factually it would require them - - he’s arguing factually it wouldn’t.  So if you can find some cases, I’d love to look at them.

(Tr. 762 -765)

COURT:              Okay.  Here’s what I’m going to do. I’m giving the (A) (1) and (A) (4).  I’m not giving the criminal trespass

  (Tr. 949)

              Apparently the corrupt trial judge LAPDOG COLLIER overlooked the very basic fact that he had been overturned by the 9^th District Court of Appeals on the very issue of failure to instruct the jury of the lesser-included offense of criminal trespass in a burglary case tried before him by Salisbury, The Pathological Liar, on August 9, 2006, Medina County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 06CR0124.

              Quoting verbatim from the 9^th District Opinion, at ¶ 2:

Defendant was indicted on one count of burglary in the Medina County Court of Common Pleas in violation of R.C. 2911.12(A)(3), a third-degree felony for his unlawful entry into the home of Brenda Roberts and assault of Ms. Roberts’ guest, Allan Leach, on January 29, 2006.

State v Morris, 2008-Ohio-3209, ¶ 2

              The facts in Morris are such that Defendant Morris entered the habitation of Brenda Roberts, which, at the time of the alleged offense, was occupied by at least Allan Leach.

              The facts in Morris are strikingly similar to this case at bar insofar as Morris had frequently entered the home of Roberts on prior occasions, just as the Defendant had entered the Flintstone home on numerous prior occasions.  Further, in both Morris and this case , privilege came at issue.

              Ultimately the 9^th District Court of Appeals, in overturning LAPDOG COLLIER, held:

              Criminal trespass is a lesser included offense of aggravated burglary.

              State v. Morris, ¶ 5, Id.

             

If under any reasonable view of the evidence it is possible for the trier of fact to find the defendant not guilty of the greater offense and guilty of the lesser offense, the instruction on the lesser included offense must be given.  The evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the defendant. (Emphasis added) State v Deimling (Dec. 20, 2000), 9^th Dist. No. 99CA007496 at *1 quoting State v Wilkins (1980), 64 Ohio St.2d 382, 388.

State v. Morris, ¶ 6, Id.

LAPDOG COLLIER HAD A CONVENIENT LAPSE OF MEMORY, AFTER HAVING BEEN CHASTISED BY THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS FOR ABUSE OF DISCRETION, IN HIS PURSUIT OF RAILROADING THIS DEFENDANT, AN INNOCENT MAN!

MORE PROOF THAT MEDINA COUNTY NEEDS AN INDEPENDENT CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF ITS CORRUPT COURTS BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

COURT OF APPEALS CHASTISES SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, FOR PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, ALL TO NO AVAIL !!

In a matter unrelated to the the proceedings being profiled at this blog, the 9th District Court of Appeals at Akron, Ohio took particular note of the misconduct of Medina Assistant Prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR during a trial conducted before LAPDOG MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.


In his usual and customary manner, LAPDOG COLLIER permitted and facilitated the MISCONDUCT BY SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.


The specific matter involves the trial of Brian Johnson, Medina Common Please Case No. 08CR0282, tried on or about June 8, 2009.  The case can be found at the online docket of the Medina County Clerk of Court at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/DetailForm.aspx?case=08CR0282


Brian Johnson appealed his case, which was overturned, in  part, on the illegal sentence imposed by SALISBURY and HOLMAN through LAPDOG COLLIER.


THE APPELLATE DECISION CAN BE FOUND AT http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2011/2011-ohio-3623.pdf and is well worth the read, particularly at Pages 16 through 40, where the Court of Appeals addressees the PERVASIVE MISCONDUCT OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, THROUGHOUT THE TRIAL!


THE COURT OF APPEALS OFFERS A SCATHING ASSESSMENT OF THE PERVASIVE MISCONDUCT OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.


HERE ARE SOME EXCERPTS FROM THE OPINION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

"An embarrassing amount of (SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR'S) cross-examination reads more like the script of a television drama than the type of cross-examination that is expected of a prosecutor." [Paragraph 44].

"That cross-examination included numerous improper references to what the fourth woman ... testified at  her deposition.  During the cross-examination of Maryann Toney, for example, (SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR) repeatedly asked questions framed to improperly put before the jury what the (fourth woman) supposedly testified...." [Paragraph 46]. 

LAPDOG COLLIER, AS ONE WOULD EXPECT, OVERRULED A PROPER OBJECTION LODGED BY THE DEFENSE AND PERMITTED SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, TO CONTINUE TO OFFER HIS PERSONAL TESTIMONY.

"During his cross-examination of Erin McPherson, (SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR) again improperly put before the jury what the (fourth woman) has allegedly said...."  [Paragraph 47]

"(SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR'S) ""cross-examination" of these women was improper, and (LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE) the trial court should not have let him get away with it."  “In the first place, it is highly improper for any lawyer in the trial of any jury case, civil or criminal, to make what amounts to testimonial assertions under the pretext that he is merely ‘asking a question.’ Secondly, it is unprofessional to put before a jury, under the pretext of asking questions, information that is not in evidence.” State v. Daugherty, 41 Ohio App. 3d 91, 92-93 (1987) (citing 1 ABA Standards for Criminal Justice (2 Ed. 1980 and 1986 Supp.) 3.91, Standard 3-5.9 and DR 7-106(C)(1) of the Code of Professional Responsibility).  [Paragraph 49].

"By repeatedly referring to what (the fourth woman) supposedly testified at her deposition, the prosecutor was attempting to introduce testimony that was not properly before the jury. “While an attorney’s lack of familiarity with the Rules of Evidence may affect the question of whether misconduct was intentional or inadvertent, ignorance of the Rules of Evidence does not render questioning allowable where it would otherwise be improper.” City of Sidney v. Walters, 118 Ohio App. 3d 825, 829 (1997)." [Paragraph 49].

"During his cross-examination of Dr. Raggio, the prosecutor argued with her aboutwhether she had refused to talk to him before trial and whether she had canceled a scheduled telephone conference...."  [Paragraph 50]

AT THIS JUNCTURE, LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, OVERRULED ANOTHER PROPER DEFENSE OBJECTION.  THIS IS HOW LAPDOG COLLIER PRESERVES HIS UNCONTESTED LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH, COMPLIMENTS OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND THE MEDINA COUNTY DEMOCRAT PARTY!

"The prosecutor’s final “question” in the above quoted exchange was not a question, it was a statement. Statements are appropriate for closing arguments. They are not appropriate cross-examination. Further, although the prosecutor repeated his claim during close, his statement was not true, or at least not supported by the record. Dr. Raggio testified, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, that N.J. had a Vitamin D deficiency that caused him to have abnormal bones and that his fractures were “consistent with a non-abuse situation.” Although some of the doctors who testified for the State disagreed with Dr. Raggio’s opinion, it was not true that all six of the doctors “brought in” by the State did."  [Paragraph 51].

Typically, SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, was lying to the jury with the full approval of LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE!  HERE IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF LAPDOG COLLIER FACILITATING THE MISCONDUCT OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR:

“Q And I guess I’m a little unclear. I guess I don’t know. It’s a little unclear to me. Have you seen the x-rays or not?

A Yes, I have. ... .

Q Both the one from June and the one from January?25

A Correct.

Q  And is that the reason that you keep saying that that’s a poor indicator for telling bone fragility, because the bones upon x-ray appear absolutely normal?

A No.

Q That is not the reason, or they don’t appear normal?

A No, that’s not the reason.

Q They do appear normal?

A Correct.

Q And would it surprise you to learn that the two radiologists who testified for the State of Ohio disagree with that opinion that you have, that x-rays are not a good way to tell bone density?

Objection, you Honor.

THE COURT: Basis

[MR. JOHNSON’S LAWYER]: Dr. Skoblar did not say that. He said the opposite.

THE COURT: I’m going to overrule that objection. You can continue, if you know.

  

WHAT YOU HAVE JUST WITNESSED HERE IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF LAPDOG COLLIER RAILROADING A DEFENDANT! 

"Although Dr. Fleissner testified that N.J.’s injuries “were consistent with childabuse, he never used the phrase “classic child abuse” that (SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR) attributed to him.Again, therefore, (SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR) was either mischaracterizing Dr. Fleissner’s testimony or relying on a conversation that took place outside the record. Either of which was inappropriate. (SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR) repeated his improper statement during his closing argument."  [Paragraph 57].

"Another example of improper conduct occurred later in the prosecutor’s cross- examination of Dr. Raggio...." [Paragraph 58].

"Again, the prosecutor was arguing, not asking questions. Further, by stating that everyone he talked to disagreed with Dr. Raggio regarding the effect of a Vitamin D deficiency, the prosecutor could have lead the jury to believe he had had conversations with experts who did not testify."  [Paragraph 59]. 

"The prosecutor’s improper conduct continued during his cross-examination of Mr. Johnson...."  [Paragraph 60]. 

"The prosecutor also committed improper conduct during his closing argument by expressing his personal belief about Mr. Johnson’s credibility and by suggesting that his lawyers were insincere :

[Mr. Johnson’s lawyers] have done a fantastic job of confusing you, and if I didn’t know what I knew and if you didn’t know what you knew, you’d be thoroughly confused. Now, I would love to be able to interact with you, because I would ask, ‘Do you think that they think the fractures happened, or didn’t they?’ Because from those closing arguments, you certainly can’t tell, right? You kept hearing that the fractures weren’t there in the photos that you saw. ‘The kid’s fine. There’s nothing wrong with the boy.’ That’s what [one of Mr. Johnson’s lawyers] just said. Dr. Oehlenschlager would never know it because he didn’t have those fractures. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. We know that he did. We know that he did. Arethey disputing the fact that he has fractures? It seems that way, doesn’t it? But you can’t dispute that, you cannot dispute that, but they are disputing it, andthat’s, allegedly, the reason they are showing you those photos.

 [ONE OF MR. JOHNSON’S LAWYERS]:  Objection. 

THE COURT: Overruled. 

 [THE PROSECUTOR]: They are talking about Dr. O. as if he went to Dr. O.and he didn’t have any fractures. That’s what they’re saying to you. That’s what they said over and over and over again, both of them.Well, how ridiculous is that? They’re trying to confuse you. Did he have the fractures or not? ‘Yes, he did,’ or ‘No, he didn’t. That really sounds kind of like his client up there. Which is it?”  [Paragraph 61].

ONCE AGAIN YOU SEE LAPDOG COLLIER FACILITATING THE MISCONDUCT OF SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, BY PERMITTING HIM TO CONTINUE WITH AN IMPROPER ARGUMENT TO THE JURY!

"Lawyers are forbidden from stating a personal opinion about the credibility of awitness. State v. Smith, 14 Ohio St. 3d 13, 14 (1984). Despite that, the prosecutor in this case told the jury that he could have predicted that Mr. Johnson would lie on the witness stand and that he, in fact, did so. And in State v. Keenan, 66 Ohio St. 3d 402, 405 (1993), the Ohio Supreme Court wrote that imputing insincerity to defense counsel was improper. By suggesting to the jurors that Mr. Johnson’s lawyers were trying to confuse them, the prosecutor suggested that his lawyers did not believe in his innocence. That was improper."  [Paragraph 62].

"In Fears, former Chief Justice Moyer noted that courts often comment on the misconduct of prosecutors, but declare their conduct to be nonprejudicial in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt. State v. Fears, 86 Ohio St. 3d 329, 350 (1999) (Moyer, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). He noted that, despite the Ohio Supreme Court’s admonitions about misconduct, “our protestations have failed to change the advocacy of some prosecutors. It is as if they intentionally engage in improper conduct, safe in the belief that this 

court will continue to protest with no consequences.” Id. at 352. He recommended that reviewing courts, “[i]n the interest of the integrity of the criminal justice system in this state, . . . demonstrate that our protestations are more than utterings of frustration.” He also warned that “[r]efusing to address the fundamental unfairness of a trial riddled with prosecutorial misconduct because . . . [the reviewing] court deems the evidence of guilt to be overwhelming creates the perception that we protect the right to a fair trial only when we believe that the defendant is not guilty.” Id. at 353; see also United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co. Inc., 155 F.2d 631, 661 (1946) (Frank, J., dissenting) (“If we continue to do nothing practical to prevent [prosecutorial mis]conduct, we should cease to disapprove it. For otherwise . . . [t]he deprecatory words we use in our opinions on such occasions are purely ceremonial. . . . The practice . . . breeds a deplorably cynical attitude towards the judiciary.”). "  [Paragraph 69].

"....we note a suggestion from the Eighth District that, “[i]f we are to stop short of punishing the State for a prosecutor’s misbehavior by refusing to overturn otherwise valid convictions, perhaps such cases should routinely be referred to disciplinary counsel so that individual prosecutors can be impressed with the need for ethical behavior.” State v. Cody, 8th Dist. No. 77427, 2002-Ohio-7055, at ¶38."  [Paragraph 70]

IN THE MATTER OF THE CASE BEING PROFILED HERE AT THE BLOG, THE INNOCENT MAN, RAILROADED BY SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AND LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, HAS TAKEN THE ADVICE OF THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS AND  FILED A 350 PAGE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL AND PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT WITH THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE OHIO SUPREME COURT AGAINST LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN, AND SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR!!!

"(SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR) was argumentative, asked improper questions, made testimonial assertions, referred to facts that were not in the record, misrepresented the evidence, and expressed his personal opinion of Mr. Johnson’s credibility."  [Paragraph 73].

Certainly the Johnson case, cited above, should add impetus to the 350-page complaint of Judicial & Prosecutorial Conduct, filed against LAPDOG COLLIER, CORRUPT COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, and SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, because it, and other cases, unequivocally demonstrate an ongoing and longstanding pattern of corrupt practices and misconduct by LAPDOG COLLIER, HOLMAN, AND SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR. 

SO THE MISCONDUCT GOES ON AND ON, UNABATED.  THE ONLY REMEDY TO THIS LEVEL OF CORRUPTION IS TO DISBAR COLLIER, HOLMAN, AND SALISBURY, AND SEND THEM ALL PACKING TO THE UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TO ATONE FOR THEIR CRIMES.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

SCHIZOPHRENIC CALIFORNIA MAN GETS THE "MEDINA TREATMENT"

Kelly Thomas, a 37 year-old California man suffering with mental illness, received the "Medina Treatment" from Fullerton, CA police .... he was beaten to death.

Particulars of this crime, committed by police against a harmless, mentally ill individual who suffered from schizophrenia, can be found here:
http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474979817005

A video of the beating and homicide of Kelly Clark, recorded by a bystander, can be found at:
http://orangepunch.ocregister.com/2011/08/03/kelly-thomas-beating-video/47557/

More California coverage of the murder of Kelly Thomas by Fullerton Police can be found here:
http://www.workingmannews.com/

Some interesting citizen commentary, and outrage, about this and related police actions can be found on YouTube at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1Nu3-fo9Xc

After reading some of the commentary, cited above, the blogger has noted the similarity to the corruption in Medina County politics.

However, and more compelling, the murder of Kelly Thomas by police calls to mind two events right here in Medina County.

The first is the killing of three young men by a Medina County Sheriff's Deputy who recklessly slammed into a disabled auto, killing three teens.  That Deputy was not charged with manslaughter, in spite of the fact that he took the lives of three innocent teens.  An account of that event can be found here at the blog at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/equal-protection-under-law-not-in.html

The second event is the tragic death of Susan Ruma, a local teacher who, while suffering mental illness, attempted suicide by inhaling exhaust fumes of her auto, running in the attached garage of her home.
Rather than attempting to seek mental health treatment for Ms. Ruma, DINO HOLMAN indicted and pressured Ms. Ruma to plead guilty to felony crimes.  


HOLMAN, in a response fitting for Fullerton, CA police, threw Ms. Ruma in the Medina County Jail  for 129 days and thereafter pressured her to plead guilty to Felonious Assault.


Why the Felonious Assault charge?  Well, according to HOLMAN, Ms. Ruma's children were in the family home at the time of her attempted suicide and, exercising the full capacity of both of his brain cells, decided that Ms. Ruma intended to kill her own children.

Following her treatment at the hands of HOLMAN and Medina Judge KIMBLER, not one of the brightest bulbs that ever lit the halls of the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station,
Ms. Ruma eventually succeeded at committing suicide.

Those particulars can be found in another post at this blog, captioned, "A HOLMANIZED CITIZEN DRIVEN TO SUICIDE," found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/holmanized-citizen-driven-to-suicide.html 

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

A SUITABLE REPLACEMENT FOR LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER!

Given the depth of corruption in the Medina County Courts, it seems only reasonable to expect that, sooner or later, LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, will be indicted and convicted in U.S District Court.

Thereafter, there arises the issue of whom the local politicians want to seat on the Medina County Court of Common Pleas without being properly elected by the electorate of Medina County.

A concerned citizen, and a regular reader of this blog, has sent along this link to a news article, reporting on a likely candidate who has the level of integrity matched by COLLIER and CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.

It is very worth clicking in this link to evaluate the credentials of a suitable candidate to replace LAPDOG COLLIER:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2019090/Judge-arrested-rape-charges-victim-secretly-filmed-carrying-attack.html

If the blogger were to hazard a guess, it would seem likely that this candidate has more on the ball, and knows more of Ohio law than LAPDOG COLLIER.

Come to think of it, these two "judges" resemble each other, bald heads and all!  Perhaps one day LAPDOG COLLIER and Murdoch may share the same cell.  They'll then be able to exchange "war stories" as to how each of them screwed the public, literally and figuratively.

MUCH MORE TO COME ....

A HOLMANIZED CITIZEN DRIVEN TO SUICIDE!

Here is a classic case of stellar prosecutive work done by DINO HOLMAN and his crack criminal assistants (aptly described).

IF EVER THERE WAS A BASIS FOR A LAWSUIT, THIS IS IT... POLICE, PROSECUTORS, AND JUDGE!

A poor, troubled soul attempted suicide by inhaling exhaust fumes from her car, while the engine was running in her closed garage.  Now, before she had expired, her two children returned from school, found her, and called safety forces.

So far so good!

The victim survived, and here is where DINO HOLMAN stepped in and brought ruin and devastation to the life of this victim, ultimately driven to suicide by HOLMAN himself!

This account involves an entirely different cast of characters, with the exception of HOLMAN.  This case was handled by another of HOLMAN's criminal assistants, MATTHEW "MUSTAFAH" RAZAVI, another non-intellectual, and brought before the other worthless Medina County judge, JAMES KIMBLER!

It seems as though HOLMAN, who desires to punish anyone he doesn't care for, decided to INDICT, and therefore punish in accord with his mission statement, this poor soul!


What possibly could be the charge, you might ask yourself?

Well, HOLMAN decided that, by attempting to take her own life, this tortured soul had committed the multiple offenses of Felonious Assault upon her two children, who inhaled the exhaust fumes when they found their mother!

WHAT A BRILLIANT PIECE OF LOGIC THAT WAS!


Of course, rather than seeing to it that this poor, tortured soul received psychiatric treatment, with the full agreement of KIMBLER, HOLMAN just locked her up in the Medina County Jail!


NOW EVEN A MORON, WITH THE COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE OF HOLMAN, RAZAVI, AND KIMBLER, COULD FORESEE THAT THIS WAS A RECIPE FOR DISASTER.


Of course, HOLMAN, RAZAVI, and KIMBLER apparently "forgot" that, in order to prove the crime, they had to establish that the victim INTENDED to bring harm to her children.


Does anyone in his right mind think that this woman intended to harm her children by attempting to take her own life while her children were away at school?


Nevertheless, the victim was forced to plead guilty and, ultimately, successfully took her own life at a later date.  It is certainly reasonable to assume that, had she been given mental health treatment instead of being locked up, she may very well have been alive today.


Combing the Ohio Revised Code as I may, I have failed to find that suffering from a deep depression is a violation of law, UNLESS YOU LIVE IN MEDINA COUNTY!


ANY REAL JUDGE WOULD HAVE TOSSED THIS CASE AT THE OUTSET!


That thought alone is depressing, with all of the corrupt politicians on the loose!


THIS IS CERTAINLY ONE OF HOLMAN'S FINEST ACCOMPLISHMENTS, OF WHICH HE CAN BE DULY PROUD.  Wouldn't you?


Fine bit of police work, too!  I wonder who was the rocket scientist who decided this case (really, lack of a case) should go forward to the prosecutor's office, an obvious graduate of the SHERLOCK HOME SCHOOL OF INVESTIGATION (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH SHERLOCK HOLMES, THE FABLED DETECTIVE)!


I'm surprised that HOLMAN hasn't touted this accomplishment to the Medina Gazette, published by George Spudnutts on behalf of the Medina Chamber of Commerce.


Maybe he will, in the next election cycle.  That is, if he's still around.


I WONDER IF HOLMAN TRIED TO INDICT THIS VICTIM'S CORPSE AFTER HER DEATH? I wouldn't be a bit surprised by that.


After all, it would be a snap to hide evidence from her, in that state, wouldn't it? And a great way to boost that tarnished rate of conviction!


Perhaps HOLMAN will start visiting all the cemeteries in Medina County and indict the recently deceased.  Now there's an idea for you!  HOLMAN'S rate of conviction would surely soar then, wouldn't it?


When reviewing the case docket below, two thing should JUMP OUT AT YOU:


1)  HOLMAN'S OFFICE NEVER FILED A RESPONSE TO ANY OF THE MOTIONS FILED BY DEFENSE COUNSEL AND DID NOT, ON THE RECORD, FURNISH ANY OF THE EVIDENCE REQUESTED BY THE DEFENSE (A COMMON HOLMAN TACTIC); AND


2) KIMBLER NEVER RULED ON THE DEFENSE MOTIONS (ANOTHER HOLMAN TACTIC TO WHICH THESE JUDGES SUBSCRIBE)


Here's the case docket of this hardened criminal, taken from the Clerk of Court:





Case Information

Case #	Type	Title	Subtype	Status	Filed	Judge
09CR0003	Criminal	STATE OF OHIO - VS - SUSAN W RUMA	FELONY SUMMONS	DISPOSED	1/7/2009	JAMES L KIMBLER

Party Information

Type	Name	Active	Address	City	State	Zip	Attention	Phone #	Associations
DAT	BOWERS , EDMOND F	True	225 EAST LIBERTY STREET	MEDINA	OH	44256		(330) 725-3456	RUMA , SUSAN W [DEF]
DEF	RUMA , SUSAN W	True	985 COUNTRYSIDE	MEDINA	OH	44256			BOWERS , EDMOND F [DAT]

Charge Information

Code	Charge	Sentences
2903.11(A)(2)	2 CTS FELONIOUS ASSAULT (F-2)	GUILTY/NO CONTEST TO ORIGINAL CHARGE

Filing Information

Date	Title	Notes	Document
5/4/2010	ORDER TERMINATING SUPERVISION	EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY	View
6/8/2009	COSTS WAIVED		No Document
6/4/2009	ORDER FOR EXTRAORDINARY FEES	COUNSEL SHALL BE PAID $1295.00 FOR ATTY'S FEES.	View
5/28/2009	MOTION & ENTRY TO APPROVE COUNSEL FEES FILED	$1295.00	No Document
5/22/2009	SENTENCING ENTRY FILED	DEF CONVICTED OF 2 CTS FELONIOUS ASSAULT 2903.11(A)(2) (F-2). DEF INCARCERATED IN MEDINA COUNTY JAIL FOR 180 DAYS ; CREDIT FOR 129 DAYS. DEF IS PLACED UNDER INTENSIVE SUPERVISION OF APD FOR 5 YRS.; 24 HRS OF COMMUNITY SERVICE; DRUG/ALCOHOL ASSESSMENT; PLACED ON THE COURT'S MENTAL HEALTH DOCKET; CONTINUE ALL MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELING & MEDICATION; SHALL NOT POSSESS OR CONSUME ALCOHOL; SHALL ATTEND 4 AA/NA MEETINGS PER WEEK; SHALL NOT HAVE CONTACT W/ CHILDREN UNLESS PROPERLY SUPERVISED; SHALL SUBMIT TO DNA SAMPLE. COURT COSTS & MONTHLY SUPERVISION FEES ARE WAIVED.	View
5/22/2009	MOTION FOR EXTRAORDINARY FEES		View
5/14/2009	CERT FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER'S FEES		View
4/13/2009	SUBPOENA(S) RETURNED BAD SERVICE CERTIFIED MAIL		No Document
4/6/2009	CHANGE OF PLEA ENTRY FILED	DEF IN COURT W/ATTY EDMOND BOWERS. DEFT W/D PLEA & ENTERED PLEA OF NO CONTEST. CRT ACCEPTED PLEA & FOUND DEF GUILTY OF 2 CTS OF FELONIOUS ASSAULT 2903.11(A)(2) F-2. REFERRED TO APD FOR PSI. BOND CONTINUED. SENTENCING SET FOR 5/14/09 @ 8:30 AM.	View
4/2/2009	CERT FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER'S FEES		View
3/20/2009	SUBPOENA(S) RETURNED GOOD SERVICE		No Document
3/19/2009	SUBPOENA(S) ISSUED		No Document
3/19/2009	SUBPOENA(S) ISSUED		No Document
3/18/2009	HEARING SET	SANITY/COMPETENCY HRG SCHEDULED FOR 3/26/09 AT 2:15 PM.	View
3/16/2009	ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE	3/16/09 JURY TRIAL CONTINUED TO 4/20/09 AT 9:00 AM	View
3/13/2009	MOTION TO CONTINUE	THE JURY TRIAL (FILED BY DEFENSE)	View
2/19/2009	NOTICE OF INTENT TO CALL WITNESSES	& USE EXHIBITS (SUPPLEMENTAL)	No Document
2/13/2009	SUBPOENA(S) RETURNED GOOD SERVICE CERTIFIED MAIL		No Document
2/9/2009	SUBPOENA(S) RETURNED GOOD SERVICE		No Document
2/9/2009	SUBPOENA(S) ISSUED		No Document
2/4/2009	ORDER TO TRANSPORT TO PSYCHO-DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC	SHERIFF SHALL TRANSPORT DEFT TO PSYCHO-DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC AT 209 SOUTH HIGH STREET, AKRON, OH 44308-1610 FOR EVALUATION ON TUESDAY, 2/10/09 AT 9:00 AM. UPON COMPLETION DEFT MAY BE RETURNED TO MEDINA COUNTY JAIL.	View
2/3/2009	NOTICE OF INTENT TO CALL WITNESSES	AND USE EXHIBITS	No Document
1/30/2009	BILL OF PARTICULARS		View
1/30/2009	DEMAND FOR DISCOVERY FILED BY THE STATE		View
1/30/2009	ANSWER TO DEFENDANT'S DEMAND/REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY		No Document
1/21/2009	ORDER GRANTING DEF.'S MOTION	TO ENTER PLEA BY REASON ON NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY	View
1/21/2009	NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY PLEA ENTERED	ORDERED THAT PSYCHIATRIC & COMPETENCY EVALUATIONS BE DONE TO DETERMINE COMPETENCY & SANITY OF DEF BY AKRON PSYCHO-DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC	View
1/20/2009	CERT FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER'S FEES	FROM JANUARY 16, 2009 HRG	View
1/16/2009	NOTICE OF TRIAL/PRETRIAL ORDER/CRIMINAL SCHEDULING ORDER	TRIAL SET FOR 3/16/09 AT 9:00 AM; PRE-TRIAL SET FOR 3/9/09 AT 8:30 AM.	View
1/16/2009	ARRAIGNMENT ENTRY FILED	DEFT IN CRT WITH ATTY BOWERS. NOT GUILTY PLEA ENTERED. BOND CONTINUED. .	View
1/16/2009	ORDER APPOINTING ATTORNEY	CRT CONTINUED THE APPOINTMENT OF ATTY BOWERS FROM MUNICIPAL COURT.	View
1/16/2009	ENTRY	OF PLEA, NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY	View
1/16/2009	MOTION FOR ORDER	PERMITTING DEFT TO ENTER A PLEA OF NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY & FOR AN ORDER FOR A PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION	View
1/16/2009	MOTION TO REQUIRE THE STATE TO REVEAL ANY AGREE. ENT'D INTO	BETWEEN THE STATE & ANY PROSECUTION WITNESS THAT COULD CONCEIVABLY INFLUENCE HIS TESTIMONY	View
1/16/2009	MOTION TO DISCLOSE IDENTITIES OF ANY INFORMANTS		View
1/16/2009	MOTION FOR BILL OF PARTICULARS		View
1/16/2009	DEMAND/REQUEST FOR THE INFORMATION PACKET		View
1/16/2009	REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY BY DEFENDANT		View
1/16/2009	MOTION TO EXAMINE EXCULPATORY/MITIGATORY MATERIAL		View
1/15/2009	EMAIL TO MEDINA MUNICIPAL COURT		View
1/14/2009	TRANSCRIPT FROM MEDINA MUNICIPAL COURT	CASE # 09CRA00020	No Document
1/8/2009	SUMMONS RETURNED AND FILED		View
1/7/2009	SUMMONS & COPIES ISSUED TO SHERIFF	ARRAIGNMENT 1/16/09 @ 8:30 AM (IN JAIL)	View
1/7/2009	INDICTMENT AND REQUEST FOR SUMMONS		View
1/7/2009	CRIMINAL CASE FILED		No Document

BY APPLYING THE LEGAL ANALYSIS THAT HOLMAN EMPLOYED BY BRINGING A PROSECUTION IN THIS CASE, HOLMAN SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH THE MURDER OF THIS INNOCENT VICTIM SOUL!


MUCH MORE TO COME ....