HOLMAN has continued to live by his personal motto as he filed his affidavit to disqualify the truly Honorable Judge Robert J. Brown, a visiting judge appointed by the Chief Justice of the Ohio Supreme Court to hear and decide the Petition for Post Conviction Relief filed by the unlawfully convicted Defendant in the case being profiled at his blog.
In his affidavit, CORRUPT MEDINA PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, who perjured himself when he swore to his affidavit, SWORE TO THIS SPECIFIC MISREPRESENTATION OF MATERIAL FACT (in other words, a LIE):
19. Yet despite the lack of actual information which would be necessary to form a basis to eventually reach an opinion on the issue, Judge Brown has already decided that the trial prosecutor [SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR] committed improper conduct. Judge Brown's willingness to opine on a merits issue of the Petition before hearing the evidence evinces a pre-determination of the issues, which at this point in the proceeding are not even properly before him.THIS IS THE KIND OF COMPLETELY DISHONEST AND DISINGENUOUS ARGUMENT THAT HOLMAN AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS ARE ACCUSTOMED TO MAKING BEFORE LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER WHO IS, IN FACT, HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG."
It is worth examining the depth of the misrepresentations of DINO HOLMAN, as he perjured himself in his "sworn" affidavit, which he has unlawfully concealed from public view at the website of the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas.
First, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN alleges that the Petition for Post Conviction Relief is not properly before the Honorable Judge Brown.
DINO HOLMAN'S false claim is disproved by the actual assignment to the case by the Chief Justice of the Ohio Supreme Court, publicly displayed at the Clerk of Court website and found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=124
The actual Certificate of Assignment, shown at the Clerk's website, certainly disproves HOLMAN'S misrepresentation on that point.
Next, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN claims that Judge Brown determined that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, engaged in prosecutorial misconduct before having a hearing.
HOLMAN'S hypocrisy shines through simply because HOLMAN filed his affidavit to block the evidentiary hearing scheduled the very day the date of the scheduled evidentiary hearing. HOLMAN had one of his newby attorneys personally DRIVE TO COLUMBUS TO FILE HOLMAN'S AFFIDAVIT SO AS TO PREVENT THE HEARING!
Lastly, CORRUPT MEDINA PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN makes the completely outrageous claim that Judge Brown has no evidence before him to determine that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, engaged in a pattern of egregious misconduct.
HOW DOES HOLMAN LIE? LET ME COUNT THE WAYS!
Compelling evidence of Salisbury's pattern of egregious misconduct was presented to the Honorable Judge by Counsel for this Defendant:
1. Defendant filed a 216-page Petition for Post Conviction Relief, with numerous cites to the corrupted transcript, demonstrating and unequivocally proving Salisbury's pattern of egregious misconduct. [ Found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=114]
2. HOLMAN filed two briefs (only ONE brief is permitted by rule) opposing the Petition for Post Conviction Relief and, in part, disputing the already proven misconduct of SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.
3. Defendant filed a Reply Brief to HOLMAN'S Opposition to the Petition for Post Conviction relief, again asserting SALISBURY'S egregious misconduct. [ Found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=120 ]
4. Defendant filed a Motion to Correct the Transcript, which pointed directly to the misconduct of HOLMAN and/or trial judge LAPDOG COLLIER. [ Found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=122 ]
5. Defendant filed a Supplement to his Motion to Disqualify the Medina County Prosecutor from further involvement in the matter of the Petition, drawing Judge Brown's attention to the 9th District Court of Appeals Opinion in State v. Brian Johnson, in which the Court of Appeals recognized and chastised SALISBURY for his "pattern of misconduct." [ Found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=122 ]
6. Defendant filed a Reply to HOLMAN's Opposition to Correct the Tampered Transcript, once again proving SALISBURY'S misconduct by direct cites to the corrupted and tampered trail transcript (at least that portion which remains of the tampered transcript). [ Found at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/viewdoc.aspx?case=09CR0229&p=1&a=129 ]
Given all of the evidence of the pattern of egregious misconduct of SCOTT SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, that had been presented to the Honorable Judge Robert Brown by and through all of the above-cited pleadings, the representation made by CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR to the Chief Justice of the Ohio Supreme Court that no evidence had been presented to Judge Brown to support a conclusion that Salisbury engaged in a pattern of egregious misconduct is a BLATANT LIE BY HOLMAN!
THEN AGAIN, AS HOLMAN LIKES TO SAY, "LIE A LITTLE! LIE A LOT! WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?"
MUCH MORE TO COME ....
No comments:
Post a Comment