WHAT A HOOT!
In his desperate attempt to avoid an evidentiary hearing scheduled by the Honorable Judge Brown, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN scrambled to get one of his newby attorneys to drive at record-breaking speed to Columbus to file an affidavit of disqualification against Judge Brown in order to avoid, at all cost, a hearing scheduled for the very next day!
To demonstrate just how corrupt is DINO HOLMAN, a person need only review HOLMAN's affidavit of disqualification. HOLMAN, however, has denied the public access to his affidavit by unlawfully filing it under his own personal "seal" with the Medina County Clerk of Court.
If the reader had lawfully mandated access to DINO HOLMAN'S DESPERATE AFFIDAVIT OF DISQUALIFICATION, the reader would quickly learn that HOLMAN wrote the following:
Readers may want to refresh concerning the case of State v. Johnson, in which the 9th District Court of Appeals chastised SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, in a prior post at this blog captioned COURT OF APPEALS CHASTISES SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, FOR PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, ALL TO NO AVAIL !!, easily found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/08/court-of-appeals-chastises-salisbury.html
HERE IS THE COMMENT FROM JUDGE BROWN TO SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AS A REBUFF TO SALISBURY'S ATTEMPT TO BRIBE THE JUDGE:
MUCH MORE TO COME ....
In his desperate attempt to avoid an evidentiary hearing scheduled by the Honorable Judge Brown, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN scrambled to get one of his newby attorneys to drive at record-breaking speed to Columbus to file an affidavit of disqualification against Judge Brown in order to avoid, at all cost, a hearing scheduled for the very next day!
To demonstrate just how corrupt is DINO HOLMAN, a person need only review HOLMAN's affidavit of disqualification. HOLMAN, however, has denied the public access to his affidavit by unlawfully filing it under his own personal "seal" with the Medina County Clerk of Court.
If the reader had lawfully mandated access to DINO HOLMAN'S DESPERATE AFFIDAVIT OF DISQUALIFICATION, the reader would quickly learn that HOLMAN wrote the following:
"Judge Brown's comment evinces a decision-making process that improper conduct occurred in this case; a process that is complete. This predetermination of an issue before a hearing occurred on the record as manifested by the Judge's comment."WHAT A HOOT! HOLMAN IS TRYING TO DESPERATELY AVOID THE HEARING HE REFERENCES ABOVE SO AS TO AVOID A JUDICIAL FINDING, BASED ON THE RECORD, THAT HIS OFFICE ENGAGED IN PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, AS IF HOLMAN AND HIS OFFICE DON'T ENGAGE DAILY IN PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, ALL FACILITATED BY LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER!
Readers may want to refresh concerning the case of State v. Johnson, in which the 9th District Court of Appeals chastised SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, in a prior post at this blog captioned COURT OF APPEALS CHASTISES SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, FOR PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, ALL TO NO AVAIL !!, easily found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2011/08/court-of-appeals-chastises-salisbury.html
HERE IS THE COMMENT FROM JUDGE BROWN TO SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AS A REBUFF TO SALISBURY'S ATTEMPT TO BRIBE THE JUDGE:
THE COURT: Are you the assistant prosecutor that handled the Brian Johnson case?
SALISBURY: Yes, sir.
THE COURT: Did you read the decision of the Court of Appeals?
SALISBURY: Yes.
THE COURT: Your conduct in [that] case pales in comparison; and my guess is you're going to get a reversal in thiscase because of your conduct at trial.SALISBURY: I don't Judge, I truly don't believe so, so. But --
THE COURT: All right.THIS CANDID COMMENT FROM JUDGE BROWN WOULD BE ENOUGH TO SEND SHIVERS DOWN THE SPINES OF HOLMAN AND SALISBURY, IF THEY HAD ANY SPINES AT ALL TO SHIVER!
MUCH MORE TO COME ....
No comments:
Post a Comment