In a prior segment of this blog, the blogger pointed out the attempts of CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN to explain away his misconduct by claiming that the aggrieved defendant had simply fabricated a "conspiracy theory."
As more than one case in point, the blogger points to HOLMAN'S brief in opposition to the appeal of Audrey Iacona. Here is a direct quote from HOLMAN'S brief, expounding his disingenuous "conspiracy theory" in that case:
THE SIMILARITY OF THE "ARGUMENTS" IS MORE THAN TELLING.
NOW THAT HOLMAN'S DISINGENUOUS "CONSPIRACY THEORY" DEFENSE HAS APPARENTLY FAILED HIM, HE'S TRYING, AS A MATTER OF SHEER DESPERATION, TO REMOVE JUDGE BROWN FROM HEARING THE PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF, PRESENTLY BEFORE JUDGE BROWN, AN HONORABLE JUDGE.
AS A MATTER OF FACT, THIS DEFENDANT AND HIS ATTORNEYS BELIEVE THAT JUDGE ROBERT BROWN IS AN HONEST AND HONORABLE MAN, GUIDED BY THE LAW AND THE RULES OF EVIDENCE,
THAT IS THE VERY REASON THAT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN seeks to remove Judge Brown from hearing the Defendant's Petition for Post Conviction Relief!
HOLMAN IS UNABLE TO INFLUENCE, MANIPULATE, AND CONTROL JUDGE BROWN AS HE DOES WITH LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, TOWN WHORE, AND HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG."
THE SIMPLE AND UNASSAILABLE FACT IS THE CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS CONSPIRE ON A DAILY BASIS WITH LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER, HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG," TO DEPRIVE CITIZENS OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, AND THE RULE OF LAW!
As more than one case in point, the blogger points to HOLMAN'S brief in opposition to the appeal of Audrey Iacona. Here is a direct quote from HOLMAN'S brief, expounding his disingenuous "conspiracy theory" in that case:
``Since February 23, 1998, when she filed her motion for a new trial,'' Holman writes, ``(Iacona) has advanced an elaborate conspiracy theory which alleges that the Medina County prosecutor and his assistant prosecutors were so intent on convicting her at trial that -- with the full cooperation of the Cuyahoga County coroner and her deputy coroners, the Summit County medical examiner, the Medina County coroner, Dr. (Mark) Collin and Dr. (Paul) Gatewood -- they deliberately withheld or concealed the . . . blood culture report of Baby Boy Iacona from the defense.'
Readers will note that CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN attempts to brush away his misconduct in that case by characterizing Ms. Iacona's claims, which are undoubtedly true, as nothing more than an "elaborate conspiracy theory."
Readers may wish to refresh by reading the prior post, A TYPICAL CASE OF HOLMAN HIDING THE EVIDENCE, found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2010/12/typical-case-of-holman-hiding-evidence.html
IN FACT, ASSISTANT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, IN AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE TO THIS BLOG, HAS OPENLY ADMITTED THAT THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE REGULARLY AND ROUTINELY WITHHOLD EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO A DEFENDANT, CONTRARY TO LAW!
In his electronic message to the blog, SALISBURY has expressly stated:
IN FACT, ASSISTANT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR SCOTT SALISBURY, IN AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE TO THIS BLOG, HAS OPENLY ADMITTED THAT THE MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE REGULARLY AND ROUTINELY WITHHOLD EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO A DEFENDANT, CONTRARY TO LAW!
In his electronic message to the blog, SALISBURY has expressly stated:
“While I understand Brady v Maryland (1963) says they must do this, it is almost impossible to enforce which is why the abuse has been going on.”Turning now to the case being profiled at this blog. wherein this Defendant was deliberately and unlawfully deprived of a fair trial by SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AND LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DINO HOLMAN once again tries to brush away the pattern of egregious misconduct by SALISBURY AND LAPDOG COLLIER when he writes, in his brief opposing this Defendant's Petition for Post-Conviction Relief:
“Backed into a corner on the jurisdictional nature of the limitations period under Ohio law, [Petitioner] reaches for unsupported allegations of some kind of grand conspiracy designed to ensnarl him. First it was the trial prosecutor and the common pleas judge who oversaw the case. Then when the jurisdictional issue on which the petition may be dismissed arose, [Petitioner] began asserting the court reported falsified the transcript. After accusing the court reporter of misconduct, who is next? If You Honor finds the petition untimely without exception, is the Court part of the alleged conspiracy. Were the Court of Appeals to affirm his conviction, are they too “in” on some kind of agreement [Petitioner] believes was entered into? From these shifting and evolving allegations, it is clear that the focus of the allegations is inextricably related to Petitioner's needs.”
THE SIMILARITY OF THE "ARGUMENTS" IS MORE THAN TELLING.
NOW THAT HOLMAN'S DISINGENUOUS "CONSPIRACY THEORY" DEFENSE HAS APPARENTLY FAILED HIM, HE'S TRYING, AS A MATTER OF SHEER DESPERATION, TO REMOVE JUDGE BROWN FROM HEARING THE PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF, PRESENTLY BEFORE JUDGE BROWN, AN HONORABLE JUDGE.
AS A MATTER OF FACT, THIS DEFENDANT AND HIS ATTORNEYS BELIEVE THAT JUDGE ROBERT BROWN IS AN HONEST AND HONORABLE MAN, GUIDED BY THE LAW AND THE RULES OF EVIDENCE,
THAT IS THE VERY REASON THAT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN seeks to remove Judge Brown from hearing the Defendant's Petition for Post Conviction Relief!
HOLMAN IS UNABLE TO INFLUENCE, MANIPULATE, AND CONTROL JUDGE BROWN AS HE DOES WITH LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT, TOWN WHORE, AND HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG."
THE SIMPLE AND UNASSAILABLE FACT IS THE CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, HIS CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS CONSPIRE ON A DAILY BASIS WITH LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE COLLIER, HOLMAN'S "PAVLOV DOG," TO DEPRIVE CITIZENS OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, AND THE RULE OF LAW!
No comments:
Post a Comment