LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, sentenced Clifford Culgan to a term of ten years imprisonment on August 8, 2002. In typical fashion, LAPDOG COLLIER failed to properly docket the sentencing entry, with the required pronouncements pertaining to the provisions of Culgan's term of post release control. Now, perhaps LAPDOG COLLIER may not be entirely to blame, since it appears he delegates the preparation of the docket entries to his bailiff, who is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, either. Best guess is that her IQ is about the same as LAPDOG'S, from which one can reasonably conclude that errors in the most minor tasks are inevitable.
On July 30, 2007, Culgan filed a motion with LAPDOG COLLIER seeking to be properly resentenced in accord with Ohio Criminal Rule 32(C). This was Culgan's first mistake, since LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, is not familiar with the Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure and, even if he were, LAPDOG COLLIER disregards them anyway, as he is ordered to do by CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN.
Needless to say, LAPDOG COLLIER expeditiously DENIED CULGAN'S MOTION ON AUGUST 1, 2007, TWO DAYS AFTER CULGAN FILED HIS MOTION. The docket entry, denying Culgan's motion, LAUGHABLY STATES THAT LAPDOG GAVE CULGAN'S MOTION "CAREFUL CONSIDERATION."
IN A PIG'S EYE!!!
On October 6. 2007, Culgan filed an appeal with the Ninth District Court of Appeals, seeking an order to compel LAPDOG COLLIER and DINO HOEMAN to issue a sentencing entry compliant with Criminal Rule 32(C).
The Ninth District Court of Appeals dismissed Culgan's appeal, so Culgan appealed the issue to the Ohio Supreme Court which ruled that LAPDOG COLLIER'S docket entry pertaining to Culgan's "sentencing entry did not constitute a final appealable order because it did not contain a guilty plea, verdict, or the finding of the court upon which Culgan's convictions were based."
The Ohio Supreme Court ruled in Culgan's favor and issued an order compelling LAPDOG COLLIER to issue a proper sentencing entry that complied with Criminal Rule 32(C) and constituted a final appealable order.
Given the fact that LAPDOG COLLIER was preoccupied with editing, scrubbing, and materially altering transcripts before MEDINA COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY filed them with the Court of Appeals, LAPDOG took the easy way out and grudgingly docketed a "nunc pro tunc" (this for that) sentencing entry.
NOT GOOD ENOUGH. CULGAN APPEALED LAPDOG COLLIER ONCE AGAIN.
This time, the Ninth District Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Culgan and agreed with Culgan's interpretation of the law that LAPDOG COLLIER "should have re-sentenced Culgan consistent with State v. Foster."
The Court of Appeals ordered LAPDOG COLLIER TO RESENTENCE CULGAN CONSISTENT WITH THE STATE OF THE LAW, WHICH LAPDOG WAS OBVIOUSLY LOATHE TO DO.
The Blogger is not at all surprised that Mr. Culgan has a better grasp of the law than does a BOOB LIKE LAPDOG COLLIER.
After he had been resentenced by LAPDOG COLLIER, Mr. Culgan once again appealed to thte Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals denied Culgan's appeal.
As an aside, Culgan appears to be somewhat of a gadfly and has peppered the Ninth District Court of Appeals with numerous appeals from judgments in the Medina County Kangaroo Court of Common Pleas.
On August 18, 2009, LAPDOG COLLIER resentenced Culgan to ten years imprisonment, with credit for time served.
Ultimately, Mr. Culgan served his ten-year sentence and was released from custody, subject to a period of post release control, under the authority of the Ohio Adult Parole Authority.
In March 2012, Culgan filed a motion with LAPDOG COLLIER seeking to terminate his post release control deriving from LAPDOG COLLIER'S SENTENCING ERRORS, AS IF CULGAN HAD A SNOWBALL'S CHANCE IN HELL OF PREVAILING WITH COLLIER, WHO IS NOTHING MORE THAN A LAPDOG TO CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN.
With regard to Culgan's March 2012 motion, LAPDOG COLLIER DID WHAT LAPDOG COLLIER DOES BEST: NOTHING !
Ultimately, Mr. Culgan worked his way up to the Ohio Supreme Court, which had to once again spank LAPDOG COLLIER.
FOLLOWING ARE EXCERPTS FROM THE DECISION ISSUED BY THE SUPREME COURT:
{¶ 4} On March 21, 2012, Culgan filed a motion to terminate postrelease
control. When no decision was made on that motion by July 24, 2012, Culgan
filed the complaint in this case in the Ninth District Court of Appeals for writs of
mandamus and procedendo. The Ninth District dismissed the complaint. State ex
rel. Culgan v. Collier, 9th Dist. No. 12CA0064-M (Aug. 8, 2012). Culgan
appealed, and both parties have submitted briefs.
{¶ 5} The appeal is now before the court for our consideration of the
merits.
{¶ 13} Culgan’s motion, which deals with an
uncomplicated issue, has been pending in the trial court for over a year. Not only
does the judge’s failure to rule exceed the 120 days mandated in Sup.R. 40(A)(3),
but a ruling on the motion would have mooted the present case, conserving
judicial time and resources.
We therefore grant a writ of procedendo to compel Judge [Lapdog] Collier [The Village Idiot and Town Whore] to rule on Culgan’s motion.
THIS IS WHAT THE CITIZENS OF MEDINA COUNTY GET WHEN THEY ARE DEPRIVED BY THE DEM PARTY OF VOTING A WORTHLESS BOOB LIKE LAPDOG COLLIER OUT OF OFFICE AND THE OPPORTUNITY TO REPLACE LAPDOG WITH A PRESUMABLY HONEST JUDGE.
No comments:
Post a Comment