LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER MUST BE A REALLY SLOW READER

Shown below is the sixth installment of the MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT, which LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER and the Republicrats at the Medina County Courthouse, Mosque & Railroad Station do not want you, the citizens, to see.  You can cross-reference any exhibits to the List of Exhibits by "CLICKING" on the link shown directly below "PAGES" at the upper right-hand corner of the web page:

3.  Trial Court I [LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER]  and the Court Reporter Deliberately Edited, Tampered With And Materially Altered the “Official” Transcript of the Proceedings in Trial I.

Defendant’s first trial (Trial I) was heard before Medina County Common Pleas Judge Christopher Collier. [aka "PUBLIUS"]

Court reporter Donna Garrity,  under contract with Judge Collier, recorded the Trial I proceedings.  Ms. Garrity is the President of Medina Court Reporters, Inc.  A copy of the business name registration, obtained from the website of the Ohio Secretary of State identifying Garrity as the President of Medina Court Reporters. Inc. is attached as Exhibit Six.

Mr. Hartman timely filed an appeal of his first unconstitutional conviction.  Attorney Robert Dixon, Defendant’s first appellate attorney served court reporter Donna Garrity with a Praecipe on March 18, 2010.  After requesting and receiving no fewer than seven extensions of time, Garrity filed the edited and materially altered transcript of the “official” proceeding in Trial I on December 27, 2010, more than thirteen months after the jury returned its verdict.  A copy of the case docket in Mr. Hartman’s first appeal, 9^th Dist. No. 10CA0026-M, documenting Garrity’s extensions of time to file the transcript, is attached as Exhibit Seven.

Suspicious of the inordinate delay in filing the “official” transcript of Trial I, Inspector Hartman reviewed and analyzed cases pending on the docket of the Ninth District Court of Appeals.  Inspector Hartman discovered that, between the dates of Defendant’s verdict in Trial I and the time that Garrity filed Defendant’s corrupted transcript on December 27, 2010, Garrity filed no fewer than transcripts of nine proceedings held before Judge Collier, including two jury trials, after the date of Mr. Hartman’s verdict.  A copy of Inspector Hartman’s analysis of court reporter Donna Garrity’s workload, obtained from the docket of the Ninth District Court of Appeals, is attached as Exhibit Eight.

The only reasonable and rational explanation for the inordinate time Garrity required to file Mr. Hartman’s corrupted transcript is that she afforded ample time to Judge Collier to edit and materially alter Mr. Hartman’s transcript.[1]

---

[1] Court reporter Donna Garrity lacks the knowledge to understand the legal concepts that would otherwise form the grounds for the Defendant to prevail on appeal and, therefore, could not, independently, determine which material alterations to make to the transcript to deny Mr. Hartman a fair hearing on appeal.

LAPDOG "PIBLIUS" COLLIER, WHO HAS BOASTED THAT HE WAS A "C" STUDENT IN SCHOOL, IS OBVIOUSLY A VERY SLOW READER.  IT TOOK HIM 13 MONTHS TO READ, EDIT, AND ALTER THE TRANSCRIPTS IN THIS CASE IN AN ATTEMPT TO DEPRIVE THIS INNOCENT CITIZEN OF A FAIR HEARING ON APPEAL FOLLOWING THE KANGAROO TRIAL BEFORE "PUBLIUS."