Friday, April 17, 2015

MEDINA ASS PROSECUTORS SHOUT THROUGH THE WALLS OF THE JURY ROOM TO PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS, ANOTHER OFFICIAL POLICY OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN

REASON #7 TO NOT HOLD THIS TRIAL, OR ANY OTHER TRIAL, IN MEDINA COUNTY.



The Logistics of the Medina County Courthouse Provides Prosecutors the Opportunity to Prejudice the Jury, Which Can Overhear Prosecutors’ Remarks Made in the Narrow Hallway Adjacent and Contiguous to the Office of the Judge’s Secretary, Where Medina County Assistant Prosecutors Regularly and Routinely Congregate During Court Proceedings.                      



Following Mr. Hartman’s first trial, one of the jurors made certain remarks to a third party with no connection to this case.  The juror’s remarks, as related to the defense by the third party, strongly suggested that the jury was prejudiced by certain remarks made by Medina County assistant prosecutors from the office of the judge’s secretary and the adjacent narrow hallway, made with the deliberate attempt to prejudice the jury.  This was, of course, just one more unethical tactic employed by the Medina County assistant prosecutors intended to deprive Mr. Hartman of a fair trial, done in bad faith.

Medina County assistant prosecutors regularly and routinely congregate in the office of the secretary to the trial judge during court proceedings.  The office is accessible via a narrow hallway, which also affords access to the contiguous jury room.  Comments made in the secretary’s office, and in the narrow hallway, can be overheard in the jury room.  Medina County assistant prosecutors have employed the logistics of the proximity to the secretary’s office to their tactical advantage to make remarks intended to prejudice the jury against Mr. Hartman and other defendants.

Further proceedings in this case, including the trial, if any, at Cuyahoga County will preclude the possibility of Medina’s assistant prosecutors from offering gratuitous remarks, within the hearing of the jury, intended to prejudice the jury against Mr. Hartman.

No comments:

Post a Comment